sscc 2015 from stars to star communities

19
From STARS to STAR Communities: Helping Cities Track Sustainability Performance March 31, 2015 Smart & Sustainable Campuses Conference

Upload: uvm-office-of-sustainability

Post on 21-Jul-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Presented by Mieko Ozeki, Sustainability Projects Coordinator, and STAR Communities intern Daniel Baker '15 at the 2015 Smart & Sustainable Campus Communities in Baltimore, MD on March 31, 2015. Session Description Similar to AASHE’s STARS, the STAR Community Rating System is a comprehensive sustainability certification program specifically designed for local governments. Both rating systems utilize selfreporting, multi-tiered systems, and have unique obstacles to overcome for participating institutions and communities. This panel presentation will illustrate lessons learned through a collaboration between the University of Vermont and City of Burlington, Vermont to become a STAR Member Community. Presenters will discuss how this kind of mutually beneficial relationship with local community can improve process efficiency, reduce costs, enhance the university’s educational reach and curriculum, and improve “town-gown” relationships.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

From STARS to STAR Communities: Helping

Cities Track Sustainability Performance

March 31, 2015 Smart & Sustainable Campuses Conference

Page 2: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Presenters

Mieko A. Ozeki Sustainability Projects Coordinator at UVM

Daniel V. Baker ‘15 UVM Student &

STAR Intern

Alex Helling UVM Grad Student &

STAR Grad Intern

Page 3: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities
Page 4: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities
Page 5: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Differences ●  Scale

●  Data Sources and Categories

●  Submission Review Process

●  Obstacles to Completion

Similarities ●  Online reporting tool

●  Two-tiered structure

o  Quantitative and Qualitative ●  Comprehensive suite of

sustainability related data ●  Strategies for Success

Differences & Similarities Between Performance Metrics

Page 6: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Differences ●  Scale

●  Data Sources and Categories

●  Submission Review Process

●  Obstacles to Completion

Similarities ●  Online reporting tool

●  Two-tiered structure

o  Quantitative and Qualitative ●  Comprehensive suite of

sustainability related data ●  Strategies for Success

Differences & Similarities Between Performance Metrics

Page 7: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Differences ●  Scale

●  Data Sources and Categories

●  Submission Review Process

●  Obstacles to Completion

Similarities ●  Online reporting tool

●  Two-tiered structure

o  Quantitative and Qualitative ●  Comprehensive suite of

sustainability related data ●  Strategies for Success

Differences & Similarities Between Performance Metrics

Page 8: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Differences ●  Scale

●  Data Sources and Categories

●  Submission Review Process

●  Obstacles to Completion

Similarities ●  Online reporting tool

●  Two-tiered structure

o  Quantitative and Qualitative ●  Comprehensive suite of

sustainability related data ●  Strategies for Success

Differences & Similarities Between Performance Metrics

Page 9: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Burlington Sustainability Partnership

City Wide Sustainability Partnership

Page 10: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

STAR Communities

Community - Campus Partnership

C.C. Regional Planning

Commission

Page 11: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

STAR Communities

Collaboration Structure

C.C. Regional Planning

Commision

Page 12: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Burlington Vermont STAR Project Started: May 2014 Stakeholders involved:

1.  BSP members 2.  BTV Sustainability Coordinator, Senior Planner from CCRPC 3.  One high school intern 4.  Three undergraduate interns 5.  One graduate intern 6.  Data holders (Citywide)

Time Involved (Supervisory 164: Undergraduate Intern: 1313, Graduate intern: 330)

1.  Monthly BSP check-ins 2.  Monthly supervisory meetings, followed by weekly meetings, plus ave. 3 hours a week (2

staff) (132 hours) 3.  2.5 hours weekly for three months (31.5 hours) 4.  30 hours a week for two-three months in summer (3 interns), 10 hours a week for fall

semester (1) (1282 hours) 5.  10 hours a week for duration (330 total hours) 6.  Variable

Page 13: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Burlington Vermont STAR Project Started: May 2014 Stakeholders involved:

1.  BSP members 2.  BTV Sustainability Coordinator, Senior Planner from CCRPC 3.  One high school intern 4.  Three undergraduate interns 5.  One graduate intern 6.  Data holders (Citywide)

Time Involved (Supervisory 164: Undergraduate Intern: 1313, Graduate intern: 330)

Page 14: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

What Happened?

Successes ●  Collaborative network ●  Educational components ●  Town-Gown relationship ●  All outcomes addressed ●  We finished!

o  Submitted January 15, 2015 o  Data verified: March 2015 o  Revisions expected: April 1, 2015

Obstacles ●  Organization/Communication ●  Learning Curve for Interns ●  Response Rates ●  Social Sustainability Data ●  Upper Level Support ●  Time spent and Time constraints ●  Unaddressed Data (actions)

Page 15: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Lessons Learned Organization/Communication

Social Sustainability Data

Response Rates

Learning Curve for Interns

Page 16: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Lessons Learned Upper Level Support

Unaddressed Data (Actions)

Time spent and Time constraints

Page 17: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Jennifer Green Burlington Sustainability Coordinator

https://youtu.be/OwT1sgtPLFU

Page 18: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Moving Forward - Create Outreach and Marketing

●  A Shared Priority

Page 19: SSCC 2015 from STARS to STAR communities

Thank you!