sstrm - strategicreviewgroup.ca - maj gilchrist soldier challenge
DESCRIPTION
Major Gilchrist - Soldier Challenge November 2009TRANSCRIPT
The Soldier’s Challenge And Future Weapons Requirements
By Major Bruce GilchristDLR 5-5 DND
November 23-26, 2009Toronto, Ont.
Soldier Systems Technology RoadmapWeapons: Lethal and Non-Lethal Workshop
Outline• Locating The Threat
• Rules Of Engagement
• The Shot
• The Shooter
• Lethality
• Current Weapons and Projects
• Ideas and vision of the future
DetectDetect
The Weapon Effects “Onion”(Lethality Chain & Overall System Performance)
Recognize / AcquireRecognize / Acquire
Identify / Hit Identify / Hit Defeat Protection(if required)Defeat Protection(if required)
Desired Target Effect(s)Desired Target Effect(s)
Locating The Threat
• Recognizing a threat– Weapon may not be carried openly– Camouflage may be civilian clothes– May have detailed local knowledge– May be one person or many– May use other persons as shields– May want to us to cause collateral damage
including casualties
Rules of Engagement
• International Laws Of War
• National Rules of Engagement– More restrictive than international law– Positive identification of a threat/hostile intent– May or may not require escalation of force
measures
The Shot
• Target – may appear with little or no warning– may be visible for 1 or 2 seconds at a time– may be obscured– may be only partially visible– may be moving between well camouflaged fire
positions– may not be concerned with surviving the engagement– Maybe wearing body armor (protected target)
• Error Budget– Shooting Accurately
5.56 NATO Error Budget
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
100 m 200 m 300 m 400 m 500 m 600 m
me
ter
Error in range estimation with +/-20 %
Target lead for one meter per second
Shooting uphill or downhill 10 degrees
20° C temperature difference
Drift due to rotation
Wind five meters per second
Firing from kneeling position (100 mm per 100 m)
Weapon and ammunition (50 mm per 100 m)
Courtesy of Mr Per G. Arvidsson
The ShooterAverage Canadian Soldier is 82 kg
Maximum weight carried should be
32% of 82 kg = 26.2 kgBut the equipment weighs • Ammo and Weapons – 9 kg • Ballistic Protection – 10 kg• Clothing, Indiv Eqpt, Load Carriage – 9 kg• Radio, NVGs, LAD, GPS + batteries – 6 kg• Water – 3 kg
TOTAL – 37kg + at temp above 40C
The ShooterSensors are critical but need power• AN/PVS-14 NVG (1 AA battery)• Maglite (2 AA battery)• PRR (2 AA battery)• GPS (3 AA battery)• EOTech Holographic Sight (2 AA battery)• AN/PVS-505 Kite Sight (2 AA battery)• AN/PAC-4C model 7500 Laser Pointer (2 AA battery)• Insight M3X Tactical Flashlight (2 Li-ion CR123A batteries)• BCID Beacon - TAG IR (1AA battery)• Spares – Mission duration dependant• TOTAL –At least 15 AA and 2 CR123 batteries daily
Op MEDUSA, one Infantry company used over 17500 AA batteries in the space of 2 weeks!
The ShooterDoes not want this:
LethalityNATO
A soldier is incapacitated when he is unable to carry out his main task, at the required level of performance, because of being wounded.
A soldier is suppressed when he is unable or unwilling to carry out his task effectively, because of the actual or perceived threat, or because of fear (in particular of being wounded).
Lethality results from• Disruption of the central nervous system• Blood loss• Infection
5 Important Factors• Shot Placement• Shot Placement• Shot Placement• Shot Placement• Everything Else – calibre, barrel length, etc
Lethality
Current Small Arms
Current CF Small Arms
Pistols
Target &
Training Rifles
Ranger & SAR Rifles
SignallingDevices
Sniper Rifles
Shotguns &
Less Lethal Weapons Assault
Rifles&
Carbines
Light Machineguns
Medium Machineguns
Heavy Machineguns
Sub Machineguns
Manufactured 1943 to 1945
Manufactured 1945 to 1953
Not compatible with new ammunition
Acquired for pest/wildlife control
Not compatible with modern night vision or other sensors
No foreign weapons for family training
No breaching weapons/ modern grenades
• Lethality: does not defeat increased personal protection
• Ammunition: Minimal multi-effects and few non-lethal capabilities
• Accuracy: Requires significant level of training for effect
• Inconsistent Visibility: Even with viewing aids, visibility by day/night is different.
• Signature Management: Noise/flash are distinctive.
• Integration/Networking: No direct link to the Soldier System
• Adaptive Dispersed Operations (ADO): Difficulty in integrating current small arms into the net-enabled and dispersed concept of ADO
• Ergonomics: Poor weight, compactness and operating commonality
• Ancillaries: Ancillaries available but not integrated.
Current CapabilityCurrent Capability DeficienciesDeficienciesCurrent CapabilityCurrent Capability DeficienciesDeficiencies
Snipers Systems Project
• Will provide a complete and fully integrated system of sniper equipment from clothing, camouflage, sensors, communications, weapons, night vision equipment, to transportation.
Snipers SystemSniper Systems Project• Will integrate the 8
sensors/devices used by the sniper spotter into 1 system
• Laser range finder• Night vision system• High power telescope• GPS• Inclinometer• Compass• Weather station (air pressure,
humidity, air temperature, wind speed)• IR thermometer (ammunition
temperature)• Ballistic calculator
• The system output, the ballistic solution, will be inserted directly into the sniper’s weapon sight
Snipers Systems Project
Will also acquire• Additional medium & long
range rifles• A sniper short range semi-
automatic rifle• New ammunition• Specialized light weight
clothing• Specialized light weight
protective equipment (helmet, frag vest etc)
• Special individual and collective camouflage
• Transportation system• Lightweight communication
equipment• Battle management system
SARP II Program
• SARP 2 will modernize or replace the CF small arm capability
Small Arms Replacement Project 2
• Value $1.0 Billion to 1.4 Billion• Three phases • Phase 1 (Tentative 2012-2015)
– Pistol, Ranger Rifle, Grenade Launcher, Shotguns• Phase 2 (Tentative 2015-2018)
– PDW, Boarding Party Weapons, Breaching systems, Grenades
• Phase 3 (Tentative 2018-2022)– Infantry Assault Weapons & Machineguns
SARP 2 Major Issues • Coordination with Integrated Soldier
System Project (ISSP)– What parts of the soldier system are to be
weapon mounted & why
• New operational concepts - ADO• US Army/NATO decision on calibers• Evaluation of Terminal Ballistics
performance• Reducing the training requirement
• The weapon is already the location for sensors and electronic devices
• Pointing with a weapon is natural for a soldier– Export information used by accurate pointing
– Use the Battle Management System to help the soldier locate the tgt in the weapon sights
• Accurate pointing can be used to enhance the squad SA if the EO devices export information & images to the network– Need to be geo-referenced
– Time stamped
Weapons and the Network
Allow the soldier toselect what information is displayed
1 or 2 default configurations That can be tailored
Information from the network
IFF
Direction to an assigned target
Remaining Ammunition
Enemy
Unknown
Friendly
The Scene
The Squad Commander’s view
Fire team on the balcony
Suspicious activity is noted
Using the EO on the weapon the squad commander tries to identify the threat but the view is obstructed
How can the squad commander direct the fire team to confirm the identity?
How do they know they are looking at the same person?
The Squad Commander’s view
The Scene
The Fire Team’s view
The Scene
With networked weapon mounted sensors
With Blue InformationFrom the BMS
The suspicious person is noticed, lased and the information is passed to the Fire team
The Commander also passes an image of the person with the location information
The information is injected into the fire team weapon sights
They use their EO to rapidly locate, confirm and remove the threat
The Scene
With networked weapon mounted sensors
Any squad member can now quickly locate and bring accurate fire against a threat or put extra eyes on a potential threat
Requirement on the precision capability: Concept – Automated engagement of the target
Or in a machinegun
Define the target area
Position sensors stops weapon from firing if shots will be outside of the box
The Vision?• The future vision is to develop a portable and
integrated weapon system for the soldier and the section which will increase weapon effectiveness, provide scalable lethal and non-lethal effects, against a variety of targets at the desired range/conditions (night & day) while minimizing system weight, i.e. :– Enhanced target acquisition and hand-off through
networking with ISSP– Enhanced target identification– Greater accuracy– Enhanced hit probability– Suitable target effects
• For lethal cases: Rapid incapacitation• For non-lethal cases: Target neutralisation with reversible
effects