st. thomas grouper analysis
DESCRIPTION
St. Thomas Grouper Analysis. Carried out under STFA Funding Josh Nowlis , Ph.D. Stock Assessment Specialist. Data Sources. Catch Reports (Snapper/Grouper) 1974-1999 Catch Reports (by Fishing Method) 1974-2012 Catch Reports (Grouper Landings) 1997-2012 Port Sampling (TIP) 1979-2012 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
St. Thomas Grouper Analysis
Carried out under STFA FundingJosh Nowlis, Ph.D. Stock Assessment Specialist
Data Sources
• Catch Reports (Snapper/Grouper) 1974-1999• Catch Reports (by Fishing Method) 1974-2012• Catch Reports (Grouper Landings) 1997-2012• Port Sampling (TIP) 1979-2012• STFA Studies (2005-6, 2006, 2008, 2010-2012)• Rick Nemeth’s Red Hind Bank Studies (2000-2012)• Olsen and LaPlace Nassau Grouper/Hind data
from 1974
Total St. Thomas Finfish Landingsby method
19741976
19781980
19821984
19861988
19901992
19941996
19982000
20022004
20062008
20102012
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
Diving Nets Line Fishing Traps
Tota
l Fin
fish
Land
ings
(lbs
)
St. Thomas Grouper Landings (Estimated and Reported
19741976
19781980
19821984
19861988
19901992
19941996
19982000
20022004
20062008
20102012
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
SEFSC Grouper Estimated Grouper
ACL
National Standard 198-623 (1) Conservation and management measures shall prevent overfishing while achieving, on a continuing basis, the optimum yield from each fishery for the United States fishing industry.
(28) The term "optimum", with respect to the yield from a fishery, means the amount of fish which–
(A) will provide the greatest overall benefit to the Nation, particularly with respect to food production and recreational opportunities, and taking into account the protection of marine ecosystems;
(B) is prescribed as such on the basis of the maximum sustainable yield from the fishery, as reduced by any relevant economic, social, or ecological factor; and
(C) in the case of an overfished fishery, provides for rebuilding to a level consistent with producing the maximum sustainable yield in such fishery.
St. Thomas Estimated Grouper Landings (and OFL/ACL)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
Estimated Grouper LandingsReported Grouper LandingsOFLAdjusted ACLOriginal ACL E
sim
ated
Gro
uper
Land
ings
(lbs
)
R2 Reported and Estimated =0.486
Timing of ClosureSt. Thomas Grouper Landings by Month (1999-2006)
January
February
March
AprilMay
JuneJuly
August
September
October
November
December
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
19992000200120022003200420052006Average
Red Hind Average TL
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015240
260
280
300
320
340
360
380
Avg TLTota
l Len
gth
(mm
)
1982 Strong El Nino1986 Moderate El Nino1987 Moderate El Nino
STT Grouper Abundance Measures
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 20120
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Standardized Red Hind Bank Density
Red Hind Trap CPUE
Grouper Trap CPUE
Year
Rela
tive
Abun
danc
e)
Recommendations• Dr. Nemeth should be funded to carry out an annual survey
on the hind bank MCD. These normally take place in February to March.
• Following the survey, the results should be assessed and the OFL/ACL adjusted to account for variations in recruitment on the MCD.
• Fishermen should be involved in this review and adjustment process.
• The OFL should serve as the ACL guide.• The CFMC should not only insure funding for Dr. Nemeth’s
surveys but also establish a mechanism for review and adjustment (if required) of the ACL on an annual basis.
• We note that this approach is similar to the manner in which many fisheries are managed (e.g.. Salmon, Alaska King crab).
% Red Hind in TIP Grouper Samples
1984 1985 1986 1987 2004 2005 2006 2009 2010 2011 20120%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Nemeth January Hind Bank Census Results
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130
5
10
15
20
25
30>4131-4021-30<20
Year
Red
hind
Den
sity
(#/1
00m
2)
density by size class (Jan)
Nemeth Hind Bank Census
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
5
10
15
20
25
30
# Transects
#/100 M2)
Max
Red
Hin
d/10
0 M
2
Nemeth Census vs Total Grouper Landings
5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.0040,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
70,000
75,000
80,000
f(x) = 792.510903395033 x + 46485.5497383909R² = 0.460125608111071
Hinds/100 sq. m.
Grou
per L
andi
ngs (
lbs)
Impact of Survey Based St. Thomas Grouper OFL/ACL
20002001
20022003
20042005
20062007
20082009
20102011
2012
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
70,000
75,000
Survey Based OFLSurvey Based ACLReported Grouper LandingsCurrent OFLCurrent ACL
Grou
per L
andi
ngs (
lbs)
Proposal for Grouper Management• Funding for Nemeth to carry out annual MCD census at
appropriate sample size.• Incorporate current work by Nemeth/Appledorn to
improve precision of estimate.• Use results to calculate OFL annually.• Set ACL=OFL?• Close fishery when ACL/OFL exceeded.• Current effort for electronic reporting will enhance ability
for projecting landings.• Monitor Sizes by Port Sampling to assess impacts of
fishing pressure.
Advantages
• Does not guarantee that ACL will be exceeded.
• Precautionary in that when Nemeth census indicates low numbers ACL can be reduced.
• Advantage for fishermen in that when census indicates, ACL can be increased.
• Incorporates more information than simple average landings calculations.