stack emissions monitoring report · arsenic mg/m³ 0.00040 0.00011 1 ... 1 yes bs en 15259 mean...

ESG Job Number:Report Date:Version: 1Report By: Hugh McmahonMCERTS Number: MM 15 1347MCERTS Level: MCERTS Level 2 - Team LeaderTechnical Endorsements: TE1, TE2 & TE4

Report Approved By: David HayMCERTS Number: MM 04 552Business Title: MCERTS Level 2 - Business ManagerTechnical Endorsements: 1, 2, 3 & 4

Signature:

2-4 Langlands PlaceKelvin South Business Park

East KilbrideG75 0YF

Tel: 01355 246 730Fax: 01355 249 669

Permit:IE Licence: P0401-01

Your contact at ESG

Clondalkin

Metal Processors Ltd

Dublin 22

Release Point: AE1 - Bag House Filter Exhaust

David HayBusiness Manager - North

Tel: 01355 246 730Email: [email protected]

Operator & Address:

Station Rd

Ireland

Sampling Date(s):22nd May 2017

10th July 2017LEK 10709

STACK EMISSIONS MONITORING REPORT

Report Template Version 26 Nov 16 of 32

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Stack Emissions Monitoring Objectives

- Plant

- Operator

- Stack Emissions Monitoring Test House

Emissions Summary

Monitoring Times

Process Details

Monitoring Methods

Analytical Methods

- Sampling Methods with Subsequent Analysis

- On-Site Testing

Sampling Location

- Sampling Plane Validation Criteria

- Duct Characteristics

- Sampling Lines & Sample Points

- Sampling Platform

- Sampling Location / Platform Improvement Recommendations

Sampling and Analytical Method Deviations

APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1 - Monitoring Schedule, Calibration Checklist & Monitoring Team

APPENDIX 2 - Summaries, Calculations, Raw Data and Charts

APPENDIX 3 - Measurement Uncertainty Budget Calculations

CONTENTS

of 32

Metal Processors LtdClondalkinAE1 - Bag House Filter Exhaust

LEK 10709 / Version 122nd May 2017

IE Licence: P0401-01

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Plant

AE1 - Bag House Filter Exhaust

Operator

Metal Processors Ltd

Station Rd

Clondalkin

Dublin 22

Ireland


Stack Emissions Monitoring Test House

ESG - East Kilbride Laboratory2-4 Langlands PlaceKelvin South Business ParkEast KilbrideG75 0YFUKAS and MCERTS Accreditation Number: 1015

Opinions and interpretations expressed herein are outside the scope of UKAS accreditation.MCERTS accredited results will only be claimed where both the sampling and analytical stages are UKAS accredited.This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of ESG.

MONITORING OBJECTIVES

ESG were commissioned by Metal Processors Ltd to carry out stack emissions monitoring to determine the release of prescribed pollutants from thefollowing Plant under normal operating conditions.

Metal Processors Ltd operates a recycling of non ferrous waste process at Clondalkin which is subject to IE Licence P0401-01, under the EU (IndustrialEmissions) Regulations 2013.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The results of these tests shall be used to demonstrate compliance with a set of emission limit values for prescribed pollutants as specified in the Plant's IE Licence, P0401-01.

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Parameter Units Result Calculated Uncertainty

Limit

+/-Total Particulate Matter mg/m³ 2.33 0.24 10Particulate Emission Rate g/hr 35.3 3.56 -Arsenic mg/m³ 0.00040 0.00011 1Arsenic Emission Rate g/hr 0.0058 0.0016 -Cadmium mg/m³ 0.00040 0.00078 0.5Cadmium Emission Rate g/hr 0.0057 0.0113 -Copper mg/m³ 0.0016 0.00043 5Copper Emission Rate g/hr 0.023 0.0063 -Nickel mg/m³ 0.0014 0.00038 5Nickel Emission Rate g/hr 0.020 0.0055 -Lead mg/m³ 0.0095 0.0026 2Lead Emission Rate g/hr 0.138 0.038 -Antimony mg/m³ 0.00031 0.00008 2Antimony Emission Rate g/hr 0.0044 0.0012 -Tin mg/m³ 0.00052 0.00014 5Tin Emission Rate g/hr 0.0075 0.0021 -Zinc mg/m³ 0.064 0.0178 5Zinc Emission Rate g/hr 0.932 0.257 -Moisture % 0.9 0.03 - P

Stack Gas Temperature oC 44 - -Stack Gas Velocity m/s 10.0 0.21 -Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual) m³/hr 17721 886 -Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (STP, Wet) m³/hr 15065 753 -Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (STP, Dry) m³/hr 14926 746 -Gas Volumetric Flow Rate at Reference Conditions m³/hr 15065 753 -

P

P

P

P

P

P

MCERTS accredited

result

P

P

P

ND = None Detected,Results at or below the limit of detection are highlighted by bold italic text.The above volumetric flow rate is calculated using data from the preliminary survey. Mass emissions for non isokinetic tests are calculated using these values. For all isokinetic testing the mass emission is calculated using test specific flow data and not the above values.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EMISSIONS SUMMARY

Reference conditions are 273K, 101.3kPa without correction for water vapour

P

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Total Particulate Matter Run 1Cadmium Run 1Heavy Metals Run 1 22 May 2017 10:10 - 11:23Preliminary Stack Traverse 22 May 2017 09:45 -

10:10 - 11:23 60 minutes60 minutes

22 May 2017 11:54 - 12:54

Sampling TimesSampling Date(s)Parameter

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sampling DurationMONITORING TIMES

60 minutes22 May 2017

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Description of process Recycling of non Ferrous Waste

Continuous or batch Continuous

Product Details Lead Products

Part of batch to be monitored (if applicable) N/A

Normal load, throughput or continuous rating Normal Operation

Fuel used during monitoring N/A

Abatement Bag Filter with Lime Injection

Plume Appearance None

Parameter Process Details

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Species ESG UKAS Lab MCERTS Limit of CalculatedTechnical Number Accredited Detection MUProcedure Method (LOD) +/- %

TPM AE 104 1015 Yes 0.11 mg/m³ 10.1%Cd AE 108 1015 Yes 0.00039 mg/m³ 197.2%

Heavy Metals AE 108 1015 Yes 0.002 mg/m³ 27.6%H2O AE 105 1015 Yes 0.01% 3.27%

Velocity AE 154 1015 Yes 5 Pa 2.1%Volumetric Flow

RateAE 154 1015 Yes - 5%

SRM - EN 13284-1

Method

SRM - EN ISO 16911-1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SRM - EN ISO 16911-1

The selection of standard reference / alternative methods employed by ESG is determined, wherever possible by the hierarchy of method selectionoutlined in Environment Protection Agency Technical Guidance Note (Monitoring) AG2. i.e. CEN, ISO, US EPA etc.

SRM - EN 14385

Monitoring Methods

SRM - EN 14385

MONITORING METHODS

Standard Reference Method / Alternative Method

EN 14790 has been validated over a range of 4 - 40%. It is however the prefered method of the Environment Agency for concentrations below 4%

SRM - EN 14790

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

The following tables list the analytical methods employed together with the custody and archiving details:

Species Analytical UKAS Lab Analysis Lab Sample ArchiveProcedure Number Archive Period

Location

TPM AE 106 1015 Yes ESG East Kilbride ESG East Kilbride 8 Weeks

Cd ASC/SOP/117 ESG - Bretby Yes ESG - Bretby ESG - Bretby 8 Weeks

Heavy Metals ASC/SOP/117 ESG - Bretby Yes ESG - Bretby ESG - Bretby 8 Weeks

Species Analytical UKAS Lab MCERTS Laboratory Data ArchiveProcedure Number Accredited Archive Period

Analysis LocationH2O AE 105 1015 Yes ESG East Kilbride - -

Inductively coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry

Analytical Technique

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Analytical Technique

Gravimetric

Analytical Methods

Inductively coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry

Gravimetric

SAMPLING METHODS WITH SUBSEQUENT ANALYSIS

ON-SITE TESTING

UKAS Accredited Lab Analysis

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Sampling Plane Validation Criteria Value Units Requirement Compliant Method

Lowest Differential Pressure 4 Pa >= 5 Pa No BS EN 15259

Lowest Gas Velocity 8.3 m/s - - -

Highest Gas Velocity 11.8 m/s - - -

Ratio of Gas Velocities 1.4 : 1 < 3 : 1 Yes BS EN 15259

Mean Velocity 10.0 m/s - - -

Maximum angle of flow with regard to duct axis <15 o < 15o Yes BS EN 15259

No local negative flow Yes - - Yes BS EN 15259

Value Units Isokinetic

Shape Circular -

Depth 0.79 m Sample port size 4" BSP -

Width - m Number of lines used 1 -

Area 0.49 m2 Number of points / line 4 -

Port Depth 90 mm Duct orientation Vertical -In Stack -

General Platform Information

Permanent / Temporary Platform / Ground level / Floor Level / Roof

Inside / Outside

AG1 Platform requirements

Is there a sufficient working area so work can be performed in a compliant manner

Platform has 2 levels of handrails (approximately 0.5 m & 1.0 m high)

Platform has vertical base boards (approximately 0.25 m high)

Platform has removable chains / self closing gates at the top of ladders

Handrail / obstructions do not hamper insertion of sampling equipmentDepth of Platform = >Stack depth / diameter + wall and port thickness + 1.5m

Sampling Platform Improvement Recommendations (if applicable)

SAMPLING PLATFORM

Non-Iso & Gases

Filtration for TPM

Yes

Yes

DUCT CHARACTERISTICS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Permanent

Yes

Yes

A self closing gate or chain should be installed at the top of the ladder. Furthermore the platform should ideally be extended so that Line A is accessible.

SAMPLING LOCATION

Yes

No

Outside

SAMPLING LINES & POINTS

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Sample Points

Lowest Differential Pressure

Sampling & Analytical Method Deviations

The sampling point requirements of EN 13284-1 could not be met as It is only possible to access line B as there is no platform behind line A.As required in MID 13284-1 for such situations the number of sampling points has been doubled on the available line.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The lowest differential pressure measured across the single sample line is slightly below the minimum 5Pa stated in the standard.

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk




CONTENTS

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Species ESG UKAS Lab MCERTSTechnical Number AccreditedProcedure Method

TPM AE 104 1015 Yes 1Cd AE 108 1015 Yes 1

Heavy Metals AE 108 1015 Yes 1H2O AE 105 1015 Yes 1

Velocity AE 154 1015 Yes 1

SRM - EN 13284-1

SRM - EN ISO 16911-1SRM - EN 14790 SRM - EN 14385

MONITORING SCHEDULE


SRM - EN 14385

Standard Reference Method / Alternative Method

Number of Samples

Method

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Equipment I.D. Equipment I.D. Equipment I.D.

LEK 9.30 LEK LEK 15.21

LEK 9.31 LEK LEK 20.2

- LEK -

- - -

LEK 17.17 - LEK 16.5

- - LEK 1.11

LEK 6.29 - LEK 2.12

- - LEK 3.15

- - -

- - -

LEK 6.29 - -

- - -

LEK 23.17 LEK -

- LEK -

- - -

LEK 15-1G - -

- - -

- - LEK 8.18

LEK 24.7 - -

NOTE: If the equipment I.D is represented by a dash (-), then this piece of equipment has not been used for this test.

Level Expiry TE1 TE2 TE3 TE4 H&S

Hugh Mcmahon MM 15 1347MCERTS Level

2Sep-20 Feb-22 May-22 - Feb-22 Sep-20

Shane Thompstone

MM 16 1395MCERTS Trainee

Oct-21 N/A N/A N/A N/A Oct-21

Dioxins Cond. Thermocouple

CALIBRATEABLE EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST

Tape Measure

Equipment

10m Heated Line (2)

15m Heated Line (1)

Control Box DGM

10m Heated Line (1)


Barometer

Miscellaneous

Equipment

20m Heated Line (1)

S-Pitot

Ecophysics NOx Analyser

Heater Controller

Last Impinger Arm

FT-IR Gasmet

Anemometer

Personnel

Box Thermocouples

Horiba PG-250 Analyser

Extractive Sampling

Equipment

Instrumental Analyser/s

Laboratory Balance

1m Heated Line (2)

Mass Flow Controller

Thermo FID

Digital Temperature Meter

Servomex

Probe Thermocouple

FT-IR Oven Box

1m Heated Line (3)

Callipers

20m Heated Line (2)

MFC Display module

Probe

Probe Thermocouple

Stackmaster

FTIR Heater Box for Heated Line

Meter Out Thermocouple

Control Box Timer

Stack Thermocouple

1m Heated Line (1)

L-Pitot

Oven Box

Probe JCT Heated Head Filter

Protractor

Digital Micromanometer

Heated Line Controller (2)

Meter In Thermocouple Stopwatch

Bernath 3006 FID

Signal 3030 FID

MCERTS Number

TE / H&S Qualifications and Expiry DateMCERTS

Site Balance

5m Heated Line (1)

Small DGM

Heated Line Controller (1)

0

Inclinometer (Swirl Device)

Chiller (JCT/MAK 10)

MONITORING TEAM

STACK EMISSIONS MONITORING TEAM

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Uncertainty Limit Emissionmg/m³ mg/m³ Rate g/hr

0.23 10 35

Blank - - -Reference conditions are 273K, 101.3kPa without correction for water vapour

TestFilter & Probe Rinse Number

Filter Start Weight

Filter End Weight

Mass Gained on Filter

Probe Rinse Start Weight

Probe Rinse End Weight

Mass Gained on Probe

Combined Total Mass Gained

g g g g g g gRun 1 AC7988 0.09561 0.09722 0.00161 156.14150 156.14360 0.00210 0.00371If total mass gained is less than the LOD then the LOD is reported

TestFilter & Probe

NumberFilter Start

WeightFilter End

WeightMass Gained

FilterProbe Start

WeightProbe End

WeightMass Gained

ProbeCombined Total

Mass Gained

g g g g g g gRun 1 AC8002 0.09518 0.09523 0.00005 202.72750 202.72780 0.00030 0.00035If total mass gained is less than the LOD then the LOD is reported

Concentration

-

Acetone Blank Value


Run 1

0.22

Sampling Times

mg/l

BLANKS

SAMPLES

11:54 - 12:5422 May 2017

2.33

TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER SUMMARYParameter

mg/m³

Acceptable Value

2.0 10mg/l

FILTER INFORMATION

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

ISOKINETIC SAMPLING EQUATIONS - RUN 1 TPM

Absolute pressure of stack gas, Ps Molecular weight of dry gas, Md

Barometric pressure, Pb mm Hg 769.51 CO2 % 0.03Stack static pressure, Pstatic mm H2O -275.32 O2 % 20.95Ps = Pb + (Pstatic) mm Hg 749.26 Total % 20.98

N2 (100 -Total) % 79.02Vol. of water vapour collected, Vwstd Md = 0.44(%CO2)+0.32(%O2)+0.28(%N2) 28.84

g 11.8 Molecular weight of wet gas, Ms

Vwstd = (0.001246)(Vlc) m3 0.0147028 Ms = Md(1 - Bwo) + 18(Bwo) g/gmol 28.74Volume of gas metered dry, Vmstd Actual flow of stack gas, Qa

Volume of gas sample through gas meter, Vm m3 1.686 Area of stack, As m2 0.49

Gas meter correction factor, Yd 0.9910 Qa = (60)(As)(Vs) m³/min 306.4Mean dry gas meter temperature, Tm

oC 22.208 Total flow of stack gas, Q73.589 Conversion factor (K/mm.Hg) 0.3592

Vmstd = (0.3592)(Vm)(Pb+(DH/13.6))(Yd) m3 1.575 Qstd = (Qa)Ps(0.3592)(1-Bwo) Dry 249.4 (Ts) +273

Volume of gas metered wet, Vmstw @O2ref No O2 RefVmstw = Vmstd + Vwstd m3 1.5897 (Ts) +273

Qstw = (Qa)Ps(0.3592) Wet 251.76 (Ts) +273

No Percent isokinetic, %INozzle diameter, Dn mm 8.00

% oxygen measured in gas stream, act%O2 21.0 Nozzle area, An mm2 50.27% oxygen reference condition 21 Total sampling time, q min 60

No O2 Ref %I = (4.6398E6)(Ts+273)(Vmstd) % 102.6 (Ps)(Vs)(An)(q)(1-Bwo)

Vmstd@X%oxygen = (Vmstd) (O2 Ref) m3 No O2 Ref Acceptable isokinetic range 95% to 115% YesMoisture content, Bwo Particulate Concentration, CBwo = Vwstd 0.0092 Mass collected on filter, Mf g 0.00161

% 0.92 Mass collected in probe, Mp g 0.00210Moisture by FTIR % - Total mass collected, Mn g 0.00371Velocity of stack gas, Vs Cwet = Mn mg/m³ 2.334Pitot tube velocity constant, Kp 34.97 Vmstw

Velocity pressure coefficient, Cp 0.843 Cdry = Mn mg/m³ 2.355Mean of velocity heads, DPavg mm H2O 8.21 Vmstd

Mean square root of velocity heads, ÖDP 2.87 Cdry@X%O2 = Mn mg/m³ No O2 RefMean stack gas temperature, Ts

oC 55Vs = (Kp)(Cp)(ÖDP)(Ö(Ts + 273)) m/s 10.42 Particulate Emission Rates, E (Ms)(Ps) E = [(Cwet)(Qstw)(60)] / 1000 35.25

Vmstd@X%oxygen

Is the process burning hazardous waste? (If yes, no favourable oxygen correction)

O2 Reference Factor

QstdO2 = (Qa)Ps(0.3592)(1-Bwo)(O2REF)


O2 Ref = 21.0 - act%O2

21.0 - ref%O2

Moisture trap weight increase,Vlc

13.6

Tm + 273

Vol. of gas metered at O2 Ref. Cond., Vmstd@X%O2

Vmstd + Vwstd

Mean pressure drop across orifice, DH mmH2O

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

litre/min litre/min litre/min mm Hg litre/minRun 1 27.84 0.02 0.02 -254 0.56 Yes

% mg/m³ mg/m³Run 1 102.62 Yes Run 1 0.11 0.5 Yes

Acceptable isokinetic range 95% to 115% The above is based on both the Filter and rinse uncertainty

mg/m3 mg/m3 mg/m3 mg/m3

mm °CRun 1 Glass Fibre 47 55

BLANK VALUE

Pre-sampling Leak Rate

Acceptable Leak Rate

Overall Blank Value

Filter SizeFilter Material

WEIGHING BALANCE UNCERTAINTYISOKINETICITY

Acceptable Blank Value

160

Daily Emission Limit Value

Overall Blank Acceptable

Isokinetic Variation

LOD < 5% ELVRun

Result

FILTERS

°C

Run

Mean Sampling Rate

Maximum Vacuum

Run

180

Acceptable Isokineticity

°C

TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECKLIST

LEAK RATELeak Tests

Acceptable?

Run

1.0

Max Filtration Temperature

10 Yes


5% ELV

Blank 1

Pre-use Filter Conditioning Temperature

0.22

Post-sampling Leak RateRun

Post-use Filter Conditioning Temperature

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

LOD Limit Emissionmg/m³ mg/m³ Rate g/hr

0.0004 0.50 0.0057

- - -

LOD Limit Emissionmg/m³ mg/m³ Rate g/hr

0.0023 - 1.130

- - -Reference conditions are 273K, 101.3kPa without correction for water vapour

Metals LOD Concentration Emission UKASmg/m³ mg/m³ Rate g/hr Accredited

0.00039 0.00040 0.00574 147% P

LOD Concentration Emission UKASmg/m³ mg/m³ Rate g/hr Accredited

0.00026 0.00040 0.006 109% P

0.00026 0.00031 0.004 197% P

0.00033 0.00157 0.023 51% P

0.00033 0.00953 0.138 20% P

0.00034 0.00137 0.020 51% P

0.00020 0.00052 0.008 100% P

0.00059 0.06437 0.932 18% P

Total Other Heavy Metals 0.00230 0.07806 1.130 27.6% -Reference conditions are 273K, 101.3kPa without correction for water vapour

Uncertainty (%)

Arsenic

Field Blank

10:10 - 11:23 22 May 2017

Test

Concentration

Sampling Times

CADMIUM

TOTAL HEAVY METALS COMBINED

Testmg/m³

Nickel

0.0003

mg/m³

Sampling Times

-


Antimony

Concentration

Metals

INDIVIDUAL METALS SUMMARY - SOLID & VAPOUR PHASES COMBINED

0.0031-

Cadmium

Uncertainty (%)

Zinc

Copper

Field Blank

Run 1

Tin

10:10 - 11:23 22 May 2017

Run 1 0.0004

HEAVY METALS SOLID & VAPOUR PHASES COMBINED

Lead

0.0781

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

MetalsStack LOD Concentration Stack LOD Concentration

mg/m³ mg/m³ug mg/m³ ug mg/m³

0.0004 0.60 0.0004 0.00001 0.02 0.00001Volume Sampled m3


Stack LOD Concentration Stack LOD Concentrationmg/m³ mg/m³

ug mg/m³ ug mg/m³0.00026 0.40000 0.00026 0.00001 0.22656 0.000140.00026 0.40000 0.00026 0.00001 0.08020 0.000050.00032 2.00000 0.00128 0.00001 0.45932 0.000290.00032 9.00000 0.00575 0.00001 5.92300 0.003780.00032 2.00000 0.00128 0.00002 0.14076 0.000090.00019 0.60000 0.00038 0.00001 0.21437 0.000140.00032 100.00000 0.06384 0.00027 0.83560 0.00053

Total Other Heavy Metals 0.00198 114.40000 0.07303 0.00032 7.87981 0.00503Volume Sampled m3



Arsenic

PARTICULATE PHASE

HEAVY METALS - RUN 1 SUMMARY

VAPOUR PHASE

Laboratory Result

Cadmium

Metals

PARTICULATE PHASE

1.56641.5664

VAPOUR PHASE

Copper

Zinc

Lead

Laboratory Result

Tin

1.5664

Antimony

1.5664

Laboratory Result

Laboratory Result

Nickel

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

MetalsStack LOD Concentration Stack LOD Concentration

mg/m³ mg/m³ug mg/m³ ug mg/m³

0.00038 0.5 0.00032 0.00001 0.02050 0.00001Volume Sampled m3


Stack LOD Concentration Stack LOD Concentrationmg/m³ mg/m³

ug mg/m³ ug mg/m³0.00026 0.40000 0.00026 0.00001 0.02050 0.000010.00026 0.40000 0.00026 0.00001 0.02050 0.000010.00032 0.50000 0.00032 0.00001 0.47150 0.000300.00032 0.50000 0.00032 0.00001 0.22550 0.000140.00032 0.50000 0.00032 0.00002 0.16400 0.000100.00019 0.30000 0.00019 0.00001 0.02050 0.000010.00032 0.50000 0.00032 0.00027 0.82000 0.00052

Total Other Heavy Metals 0.00198 3.10000 0.00198 0.00032 1.74250 0.00111Volume Sampled m3


HEAVY METALS - BLANK SUMMARY

Nickel

1.5664

Arsenic

Lead

1.5664Cadmium

VAPOUR PHASE

VAPOUR PHASE

Antimony

1.5664

Zinc

Copper

Metals

1.5664

Laboratory Result

Laboratory Result

Tin

Laboratory Result

PARTICULATE PHASE

Laboratory Result

PARTICULATE PHASE


of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

ISOKINETIC SAMPLING EQUATIONS RUN 1 Cd, Tl & Heavy Metals

Absolute pressure of stack gas, Ps Molecular weight of dry gas, Md

Barometric pressure, Pb mm Hg 770.3 CO2 % 0.03Stack static pressure, Pstatic mm H2O -410.1 O2 % 20.95Ps = Pb + (Pstatic) mm Hg Total % 20.98

740.1 N2 (100 -Total) % 79.02Md = 0.44(%CO2)+0.32(%O2)+0.28(%N2) 28.84

Vol. of water vapour collected, Vwstd Molecular weight of wet gas, Ms

g - Ms = Md(1 - Bwo) + 18(Bwo) g/gmol 28.74Vwstd = (0.001246)(Vlc) m3 - Velocity of stack gas, Vs

Volume of gas metered dry, Vmstd Pitot tube velocity constant, Kp 34.97Velocity pressure coefficient, Cp 0.843

Volume of gas sample through gas meter, Vm m3 1.6467 Mean of velocity heads, DPavg mm H2O 7.58

Gas meter correction factor, Yd 0.9910 Mean square root of velocity heads, ÖDP 2.75Mean dry gas meter temperature, Tm

oC 19.79 Mean stack gas temperature, TsoC 53

Mean pressure drop across orifice, DH mmH2O 66.89 Vs = (Kp)(Cp)(ÖDP)(Ö(Ts + 273)) m/s 10.04 (Ms)(Ps)

Vmstd = (0.3592)(Vm)(Pb+(DH/13.6))(Yd) m3 1.55 Actual flow of stack gas, Qa

Area of stack, As m2 0.49Volume of gas metered wet, Vmstw Qa = (60)(As)(Vs) m³/min 295.4

Total flow of stack gas, QVmstw = Vmstd + Vwstd m3 1.5664 Conversion factor (K/mm.Hg) 0.3592

Qstd = (Qa)Ps(0.3592)(1-Bwo) Dry 238.9 (Ts) +273

No @O2ref No O2 Ref (Ts) +273

% oxygen measured in gas stream, act%O2 21.0 Qstw = (Qa)Ps(0.3592) Wet 241.2% oxygen reference condition 21 (Ts) +273

O2 Ref = 21.0 - act%O2 No O2 Ref Percent isokinetic, %I 21.0 - ref%O2 Nozzle diameter, Dn mm 8.00

Vmstd@X%oxygen = (Vmstd) (O2 Ref) m3 No O2 Ref Nozzle area, An mm2 50.27Moisture content, Bwo Total sampling time, q min 60

%I = (4.6398E6)(Ts+273)(Vmstd) % 105.6Bwo = Vwstd 0.0092 (Ps)(Vs)(An)(q)(1-Bwo)

% 0.92Moisture by FTIR % - Acceptable isokinetic range 95% to 115% Yes

Moisture trap weight increase,Vlc

QstdO2 = (Qa)Ps(0.3592)(1-Bwo)(O2REF)

Tm + 273

Vmstd + Vwstd

Vol. of gas metered at O2 Ref. Cond., Vmstd@X%O2

O2 Reference Factor


13.6

Is the process burning hazardous waste? (If yes, no favourable oxygen correction)

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Leak Tests AcceptableAcceptable

litre/min litre/min litre/min mm Hg litre/min litre/min27.2 0.04 0.04 -330.2 0.54 Yes

Isokinetic Criterion Compliance

mm °C °CQuartz Fibre 47 180 20

Filter Size

Type of Absorbers - Metals

Run 1

Glass

Leak Test Results

HEAVY METALS QA CHECKLIST

Pre-sampling Leak Rate

Maximum Vacuum

Mean Sampling Rate


Acceptable Leak Rate

Run 1

105.6

Run 1

Metals

Isokinetic Variation Acceptable Isokineticity

Post-sampling Leak Rate

Filter Material

%

Filtration / Temp

Run 1 Yes

Maximum storage / transit

Temperature

Maximum Filtration

Temperature

3.3% Nitric Acid, 1.5% Hydrogen Peroxide

Absorption Solutions - Metals

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:21

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Parameter Total 3rd Absorber Absorption Required Pass / Failug ug Efficiency (%) %

Cadmium Run 1 0.62089 ND 100 90 N/A <30% ELVArsenic Run 1 0.62656 0.03 96 90 N/A <30% ELVAntimony Run 1 0.48020 0.07 86 90 N/A <30% ELVCopper Run 1 2.45932 0.32 87 90 N/A <30% ELVLead Run 1 14.92300 4.68 69 90 N/A <30% ELVNickel Run 1 2.14076 0.03 99 90 N/A <30% ELVTin Run 1 0.81437 0.09 89 90 N/A <30% ELVZinc Run 1 100.83560 ND 100 90 N/A <30% ELV


HEAVY METALS ABSORBTION EFFICIENCY

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:22

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Test Number Start Weight End Weight Total gain Concentration LOD Uncertainty

kg kg kg % % %

Run 1 3.6031 3.6149 0.0118 0.9 0.008 3.3

Test NumberSampling Duration

Total Volume Sampled

Sampling Rate Start Leak Rate End Leak RateAcceptable Leak Rate

mins l l/min l/min l/min l/min

Run 1 60 1590 27.8 0.02 0.02 0.56 Yes

Stack Diameter / Depth, D 0.79 m

Stack Width, W - m

Stack Area, A 0.49 m2

Average stack gas temperature 44 oC

Stack static pressure -2.7 kPa

Barometric Pressure 102.7 kPa

Component Molar Density Conc Dry Volume Dry Conc Conc Wet Volume Wet ConcMass kg/m3 Dry Fraction kg/m3 Wet Fraction kg/m3

M p % Vol r pi % Vol r pi

CO2 44 1.963059 0.030000 0.000300 0.000589 0.029723 0.000297 0.000583

O2 32 1.427679 20.950000 0.209500 0.299099 20.756243 0.207562 0.296333

N2 28 1.249219 79.020000 0.790200 0.987133 78.289181 0.782892 0.978004

H2O 18 0.803070 - - - 0.924853 0.009249 0.007427

Where: p = M / 22.41 pi = r x p

Determinand

Dry Density (STP), P STD

Wet Density (STP), P STW

Dry Density (Actual), P Actual

Average Wet Density (Actual), P ActualW

Where:

P STD = sum of component concentrations, kg/m3 (not including water vapour) P Actual = P STD x (Ts / Ps) x (Pa / Ta)

P STW = (P STD + pi of H2O) / (1 + (pi of H2O / 0.8036)) P ActualW = P STW x (Ts / Ps) x (Pa / Ta)

Result

kg/m3

Moisture Quality Assurance

11:54 - 12:5422 May 2017

Stack Gas Composition & Molecular Weights

Moisture Determination - Isokinetic

MOISTURE CALCULATIONS


1.2823

kg/m31.2868

kg/m3

1.0940

Sampling Time and Date

PRELIMINARY STACK SURVEY

Leak Tests Acceptable?

1.090

kg/m3

Units

Calculation of Stack Gas Densities

Stack Characteristics

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:22

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

TRAVERSE 1

Traverse Distance DP pt DP pt Temp Velocity O2 Angle

Point into mmH2O Pa oC m/s % of Swirl

duct (m)(average of 3

readings)(average of 3

readings)m³/s Vol o

- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -

Mean - - - - - - - -

Traverse Distance DP pt DP pt Temp Velocity O2 Angle

Point into mmH2O Pa oC m/s % of Swirl

duct (m)(average of 3

readings)(average of 3

readings)m³/s Vol o

1 0.02 5.0 49 44 9.3 4.6 - <152 0.06 6.0 59 44 10.2 5.0 - <153 0.12 7.0 69 44 11.0 5.4 - <154 0.18 6.0 59 44 10.2 5.0 - <155 0.27 6.0 59 44 10.2 5.0 - <156 0.52 8.0 78 44 11.8 5.8 - <157 0.61 6.0 59 44 10.2 5.0 - <158 0.67 7.0 69 44 11.0 5.4 - <159 0.73 4.0 39 44 8.3 4.1 - <15

10 0.77 4.0 39 44 8.3 4.1 - <15Mean - 5.9 58 44 10.0 4.9 - -

Start Value End Value Difference Start Value End Value DifferencePa Pa % Pa Pa %

Run 1 131 130 0.8 Pass 144 144 0.0 Pass

Time of Survey

PRELIMINARY STACK SURVEY QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECKLIST

Velocity Measurement Device: L-Type Pitot

Volumetric Flow Rate

(actual)


Post Traverse Leak Rate

Sampling Line A

Date of Survey

Volumetric Flow Rate

(actual)

To complete a compliant pitot leak check a pressure of over 80 mmH₂O (or 800 Pa) is applied and the pressure drop monitored over 5 mins. A drop of less than 5% must be observed.

Run Outcome

PRELIMINARY STACK SURVEY

Sampling Line B

09:4522 May 2017

Outcome

PITOT LEAK CHECKPre Traverse Leak Rate

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:22

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

EA Technical Guidance Note (Monitoring) M1 Units Requirement Compliant

Lowest Differential Pressure Pa >= 5 Pa Yes

Lowest Gas Velocity m/s - -

Highest Gas Velocity m/s - -

Ratio of Gas Velocities - < 3 : 1 Yes

Maximum angle of flow with regard to duct axis o < 15o Yes

No local negative flow - - Yes

Velocity at Traverse Point, V = Kpt x (1-e) * Ö(2 * DP pt / P ActualW)

Where:Kpt = Pitot tube calibration coefficient(1-e) = Compressibility correction factor, assumed at a constant 0.998

Average Stack Gas Velocity, Va 10.0 m/s

Duct gas flow conditions Actual Reference UnitsTemperature 44 0 oCTotal Pressure 100 101.3 kPaOxygen 21.0 21 %Moisture 0.92 0.92 %Pitot tube calibration coefficient, Kpt 0.98

Gas Volumetric Flowrate UnitsAverage Stack Gas Velocity (Va) m/sStack Area (A) m2

Gas Volumetric Flowrate (Actual), QActual m3/hr

Gas Volumetric Flowrate (STP, Wet), QSTP m3/hr

Gas Volumetric Flowrate (STP, Dry), QSTP,Dry m3/hr

Gas Volumetric Flowrate (REF), QRef m3/hr

Where:QActual = Va x A x 3600QSTP = Q (Actual) x (Ts / Ta) x (Pa / Ps) x 3600QSTP,Dry = Q (STP) / (100 - (100 / Ma)) x 3600QRef = Q (STP) x ((100 - Ma) / (100 - Ms)) x ((20.9 - O2a) / (20.9 - O2s))

Nomenclature:Ts = Absolute Temperature, Standard Conditions, 273 KPs = Absolute Pressure, Standard Conditions, 101.3 kPaTa = Absolute Temperature, Actual Conditions, KPa = Absolute Pressure, Actual Conditions, kPaMa = Water vapour, Actual Conditions, % VolMs = Water vapour, Reference Conditions, % VolO2a = Oxygen, Actual Conditions, % VolO2s = Oxygen, Reference Conditions, % Vol

8.3

1.4

PRELIMINARY STACK SURVEY (CONTINUED)

15065

15065

Calculation of Stack Gas Velocity, V

10.040.49

Result

Result

Calculation of Stack Gas Volumetric Flowrate, Q

17721

14926

Yes

11.8

39

<15


Sampling Plane Validation Criteria

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:22

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Value UnitsStack Depth 0.79 m Sampling Distance Distance into UnitsStack Width - m Point (% of Depth) StackArea 0.49 m2 - - - -

Sampling Distance Distance into SwirlPoint (% of Depth) Stack (m) o

1 6.7 0.05 < 152 25.0 0.20 < 153 75.0 0.59 < 154 93.3 0.74 < 15

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -

- - - -

- - - -- - - -- - - -

Isokinetic sampling point - - - -Isokinetic sampling points not used - - - -Non Isokinetic/Gases sampling point - - - -

- - - -


Isokinetic Sampling

Non-Isokinetic/Gases Sampling

SAMPLING LOCATION

STACK DIAGRAM

Sampling Line

1

2

3

4

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:22

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Run Sampled Volume

Sampled Gas Temp

Sampled Gas Pressure

Sampled Gas Humidity

Oxygen Content

Limit of Detection

Leak Uncollected Mass

m³ K kPa % by volume % by volume % by mass % mgMU required < 2% < 2% < 1% < 1% < 10% < 5% of ELV < 2% < 10% of ELVRun 1 0.001 2.0 0.50 1.0 N/A 0.1800 - -as a % 0.06 0.68 0.50 1.0 N/A 1.1323 0.07 0.004compliant? Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes

Run UncollectedMass

m³ mg - mg/m³ mgRun 1 1.45 3.7100 1.0 0.001 0.0002 -MU as mg/m3 0.03 0.1132 - 0.001 0.0001 0.12MU as % 1.31 4.8518 - 0.041 0.0054 -

0.23 mg/m³ 10.05 %(k is a coverage factor which gives a 95% confidence in the quoted figures)Developed for the STA by R Robinson, NPL

R1 - Uncertainty expressed at a 95% confidence level (where k = 2)

Leak Combined uncertainty

Volume (STP)

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET - TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER

Mass of particulate

O2 Correction


of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:22

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Run Sampled Volume

Sampled Gas Temp



Oxygen Content

Concentration in impinger

Leak

m³ K kPa % by volume % by volume mg %MU required <=2% <2.5 k <=1% <=1% <=5% <5% <=2%Run 1 0.001 2.0 0.50 1.0 0.1 0.000003 -as a % 0.06 0.7 0.80 1.0 - 3.00 0.15compliant? Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes

Run LabUncertainty

m³ - mg mg/m³ mgRun 1 0.9008 - 0.6209 0.000000 - -MU as mg 0.00001 - 0.0004 0.000000 0.00003 0.0004MU as % 1.4558 - 98.3177 0.0849 7.50000 -

0.001 mg/m³ 197.23 %

(k is a coverage factor which gives a 95% confidence in the quoted figures)Developed for the STA by R Robinson, NPL

Mass of Cadmium &

Thallium

Leak


MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET - CADMIUM


O2 Correction Combined uncertainty

Volume (STP)

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:22

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Run Sampled Volume

Sampled Gas Temp



Oxygen Content

Concentration in impinger

Leak

m³ K kPa % by volume % by volume mg %MU required <=2% <2.5 k <=1% <=1% <=5% <5% <=2%Run 1 0.001 2.0 0.50 1.0 0.10 0.0011 -as a % 0.06 0.73 0.80 1.0 - 3.00 0.15compliant? Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes

Run LabUncertainty

m³ - mg mg/m³ mgRun 1 0.9661 - 20.6298 0.0001 - -MU as mg/m3

0.0012 - 0.0090 0.0001 0.00585 0.0108MU as % 1.4791 - 11.5033 0.0849 7.50000 -

0.02 mg/m³ 27.62 %


Volume (STP)


O2 Correction Leak Combined uncertainty


Mass of Heavy Metals

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET - HEAVY METALS

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:22

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

Run Sampled Volume

Sampled Gas Temp



Oxygen Content

Leak

m³ K kPa % by volume % by volume %MU required < 2% < 2% < 1% < 1% < 10% < 2%Run 1 0.001 2.0 0.50 1.0 N/A -as a % 0.06 0.68 0.50 1.0 N/A 0.07compliant? Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes

Run UncollectedMass

m³ mg - mg/m³ mgRun 1 1.45 11800 1.0 3.08 57.7 -MU as % v/v 0.01 0.01 - 0.0004 0.005 0.02MU as % 1.31 0.85 - 0.04 0.49 -

0.03 % v/v 3.27 %


MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET - MOISTURE

Combined uncertainty

Leak



O2 CorrectionMass GainedVolume (STP)

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:22

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

10.0 m/s17721 m³/hr

Performance Characteristics & Source of Value Units Values Requirement CompliantUncertainty of Local Gas Velocity Determination

Uncertainty of pitot tube coefficient - 0.010

Uncertainty of mean local dynamic pressures - 0.35

Factor loading, function of the number of measurements. 3 readings 0.591 minimum 3 Yes

Range of measurment device pa 1000

Resolution pa 1.00

Calibration uncertainty pa 2.81<1% of Value or 20

Pa whichever is greater

Yes

Drift % range 0.10

Linearity % range 0.06 <2% of value Yes

Uncertainty of gas density determination

Uncertainty of molar mass determination kg/mol 0.00003Uncertainty of temperature measurement K 1.62 <1% of value Yes

Uncertainty of absolute pressure in the duct pa 510

Uncertainty associated with the estimate of density - 0.007

Uncertainty associated with the measurement of local velocity - 0.0001Uncertainty associated with the measurement of mean velocity - 0.0001

m/s0.110.21

%1.12.1

m³/hr452886

%2.55.0

Expanded Measurement Uncertainty of Velocity at a 95% Confidence IntervalExpressed as a % of the Measured ConcentrationExpanded uncertainty at a 95% Confidence Interval

Measurement Uncertainty Volumetric Flow RateCombined uncertainty

Note - The expanded uncertainty uses a coverage factor of k = 2.

Expanded uncertainty at a 95% Confidence Interval

Expanded Measurement Uncertainty of Volumetric Flow Rate at a 95% Confidence IntervalExpressed as a % of the Measured ConcentrationExpanded uncertainty at a 95% Confidence Interval

Measured Velocity at Actual Conditions Measured Volumetric Flow rate at Actual Conditions

Measurement Uncertainty - VelocityCombined uncertaintyExpanded uncertainty at a 95% Confidence Interval

Note - The expanded uncertainty uses a coverage factor of k = 2.


MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET - VELOCITY & VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:22

ESG

www.esg.co.uk

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/ESG_EnvSafetyCompliance_CustomerFeedback

END OF REPORT

Thank you for choosing Environmental Scientifics Group for your environmental monitoring needs. We hope our services have met your requirements and that you are fully satisfied with your experience of working with us, we really do value your custom and would welcome your feedback. We would appreciate it if you

could take a moment to complete a short online questionnaire so that we can improve our operations and address any areas that have not met with your expectations, by clicking on the following

of 32




For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-09-2017:03:16:22

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/ESG_EnvSafetyCompliance_CustomerFeedback

stack emissions monitoring report · arsenic mg/m³ 0.00040 0.00011 1 ... 1 yes bs en 15259 mean...

Documents