standardcis195!5!11 (quality assessment system for completed road works)

STANDARDINDUSTRIPEMBINAAN(CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY STANDARD)

CIS 19:2011 QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR COMPLETED ROAD WORKS

Descriptors: quality of workmanship, road surface, slope & retaining structure, bridge & other

structures, traffic / road furniture, sampling, weightage

© Copyright

LEMBAGA PEMBANGUNAN INDUSTRI PEMBINAAN MALAYSIA Standard Writing Organisation

Lembaga Pembangunan Industri Pembinaan Malaysia CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MALAYSIA

Ibu Pejabat CIDB, Tingkat 7, Grand Seasons Avenue, No 72, Jalan Pahang, 53000 Kuala Lumpur. P.O Box. 12278, 50772 Kuala Lumpur, Tel : 603 – 26170200 Fax: 603 – 40437050 http://www.cidb.gov.my

CIDBM A L A Y S I A

CIDBM A L A Y S I A

QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR COMPLETED ROAD WORKS

CIDBM A L A Y S I A

© Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia 2011

All enquiries regarding this book should be forwarded to:

Chief ExecutiveConstruction Industry Development Board Malaysia7th. Floor, Grand Seasons AvenueNo 72, Jalan Pahang53000 Kuala LumpurMalaysia

Tel : 603 – 26170200 Fax : 603 – 40437050Website : www.cidb.gov.my

No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or any means,whether mechanical or electronic including photocopying and recording without the writtenconsent of CIDB.

Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Data Pengkatalogan-dalam-Penerbitan

CONTENTS

Page

Committee representation…………………………………………………… viForeword……………………………………………………………….……… vii

SECTION 1 : GENERAL

1.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………… 11.2 Normative references……………………………………………………….. 1

1.3 Definition……………………………………………………………………… 21.3.1 QLASSIC……………………………………………………………………... 21.3.2 Component…………………………………………………………………… 21.3.3 Newly Completed Roads..………………………………………………….. 21.3.4 Road Category………………………………………………………………. 21.3.5 Elements……………………………………………………………………… 31.3.6 QLASSIC Assessor…………………………………………………………. 31.3.7 Qualified Person…………………………………………………………….. 41.3.8 Approved Standard..………………………………………………………… 41.3.9 Tolerance…………………………………………………………………….. 4

1.4 Objective of Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works…………………………………………………….. 4

1.5 Use of Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works…………………………………………………….. 4

1.6 Scope of Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works…………………………………………………….. 5

1.7 Assessment Approach……………………………………………………… 5

SECTION 2 : QUALITY STANDARD

2.1 Components…………………………………………………………………. 6

2.2 Elements……………………………………………………………………… 7

2.3 Defect Groups..……………………………………………………………… 9

SECTION 3 : ASSESSMENT

3.1 Road Weightage…………………………………………………………….. 12

3.2 Sampling……………………………………………………………………… 12

iii

CONTENTS

Page

3.3 Weightage Guideline for Assessment……………………………….. 143.3.1 Road Surface…………………………………………………………… 143.3.2 Slope and Retaining Structure……………………………………….. 143.3.3 Drainage………………………………………………………………... 143.3.4 Bridge and Other Structure…………………………………………… 163.3.5 Traffic / Road Furniture……………………………………………….. 17

3.4 Assessment Scoring…………………………………………………… 24

Tables

Table 1 Road Category and Description………………………………………. 2

Table 2 Road Elements by Components..…………………………………….. 3

Table 3 Elements and its Examples……………………………………………. 7

Table 4 Defect Groups for Assessment……………………………………….. 9

Table 5 Road Weightage for All Components………………………………… 12

Table 6 Weightage for Road Surface Elements……………………………… 14

Table 7 Weightage for Drainage……………………………………………….. 15

Table 8 Weightage Guideline for Bridge & Other Structures..………………. 16

Table 9 Weightage for Traffic / Road Furniture Element…...………………... 17

Figures

Figure 1 Typical Road Cross Section........………………………...............….. 10

Figure 2 Typical Bridge Cross Section………................................................ 11

Figure 3 Examples of Road Surface Conditions.…………………………….... 18

Figure 4 Different Types of Road Surface Defects (Aesthetic)....................... 19

Figure 5 Examples of Slope & Retaining Structure Conditions……......…….. 20

Figure 6 Examples of Drainage Conditions…………...………………………... 21

Figure 7 Examples of Bridge & Other Structures Conditions…….........…….. 22

Figure 8 Examples of Traffic/Road Furniture………………….......…………... 23

iv

CONTENTS

Page

G QLASSIC Assessment Form Component 2: Slope and Retaining Structures……………………… G1

H QLASSIC Assessment Form Component 3: Drainage……………………………………………….. H1

I1QLASSIC Assessment Form Component 4: Above Ground Structures: Road/Pedestrian/ Motorcycle Bridge………………………………………………………. I1

I2 QLASSIC Assessment Form Component 4: Underpass/Vehicular Box Culvert and Tunnel…….. I2

J QLASSIC Assessment Form Component 5: Traffic / Roadside Furniture………………………….. J1

K Defect Group For Assessment Of Road Surface Works…………… K1

L Defect Group For Assessment Of Slope & Retaining Structures Works……………………………………………………………………. L1

M Defect Group For Assessment Of Drainage Works………………… M1

N Defect Group For Assessment Of Bridge & Other Structure Works N1

O Defect Group For Assessment Of Traffic & Roadside Furniture Works O1

64Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………….

v

Annexes

A Quality Standards for Road Surface Works………………………….. A1

B Quality Standards for Slope and Retaining Structure Works………. B1

C Quality Standards for Drainage Works……………………………….. C1

D Quality Standards for Bridge and Other Structure Works………….. D1

E Quality Standards for Traffic / Roadside Furniture Works………….. E1

F QLASSIC Assessment Form Component 1: Road Surface…………………………………………... F1

vi

Committee representation

This Construction Industry Standard (CIS) was managed and developed by the Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia with the assistance of the Technical Committee on Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works which comprises representatives from thefollowing organizations:-

Construction Industry Development Board, MalaysiaHighway Planning Unit, Ministry of Works, Malaysia Malaysia Highway Authority (LLM)The Institution of Engineers, MalaysiaThe Association of Consulting Engineers, MalaysiaPLUS Expressway Berhad

FOREWORD

This Malaysian Construction Industry Standard (CIS) hereby referred as CIS 19:2011 was developedas a quality assessment system for completed road works standard by the Technical Committeeon Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works with the assistance of Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB) which acted as a moderator and facilitator for the technical committee throughout the development process of this standard.

Compliance with this document does not in itself confer immunity from legal obligations.

vii

1

QUALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR COMPLETED ROAD WORKS

SECTION 1: GENERAL 1.1 Introduction Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works is an independent method to assess and evaluate the quality of workmanship of newly completed road works based on this standard. 1.2 Normative References The following normative reference is indispensable for the application of this construction industry standard. For dated reference, only the edition cited applies. For undated reference, the latest edition of the normative reference (including any amendments) applies. Specification for Roadworks (JKR/SPJ/2008-S4: Flexible Pavement), Published by JKR Malaysia. JKR/SPJ/1988 – Standard Specification for Road Works. LLM / PLUS Specifications. Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2D/85, Manual on Traffic Control Devices: Road Marking And Delineation, Public Work Department Malaysia. Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 2B/85, Manual on Traffic Control Device: Traffic Sign Application. Guidelines for Road Drainage Design, Published by REAM. Guideline for Malaysia Toll Expressway System – Design Standard, by Malaysia Highway Authority (LLM). Annual Bridge Inspection Manual – Quick Inspection Guideline, by JKR. A Guide for Bridge Inspection , Published by REAM. MS 881:Pt1: 1991 Specification for Precast Concrete, SIRIM. MS 1303:Pt1:1993 Specification for Thermoplastic Road Marking Materials, SIRIM. MS 164: 1991 Specification for Road Marking Paints, SIRIM. AS 4058: 1992 Precast Concrete Pipes (pressure and non-pressure).

Highway and Rail Transit Tunnel Inspection Manual, by U.S. Department of Transportation.

2

1.3 Definition For the purpose on this Construction Industry Standard the following definitions apply. 1.3.1 QLASSIC QLASSIC is the acronym for quality assessment system in construction. 1.3.2 Component A component refers to the physical part which can be found in a road construction project. For the purpose of this standard the following components are applicable:

i. Road Surface; ii. Slope and Retaining Structure; iii. Drainage; iv. Bridges and Other Structures; and v. Traffic / Road Furniture

1.3.3 Newly Completed Roads Newly completed roads are roads which are new, not opened to traffic and as deemed fit to be assessed by the Consultant. Ideally, this road has already been assessed in terms of its adherence to design specifications. The Consultant shall mean the Main Design and Supervision Consultant for the road project. Newly completed roads exclude additional and/or upgrading works carried out on to an already completed road. 1.3.4 Road Category For the purpose of this standard, the roads are divided into five (5) categories as defined below:

Table 1. Road Category and Description Road

Category Description JKR Standard

A Include inter-urban expressways and highways where tolls are collected. Normally these roads are under the jurisdiction of the Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia (LLM).

JKR R6/U6 and equivalent

B

Include national highways, primary state roads and roads within Federal Territories. These are inter-urban highways linking Federal Capitals, State Capitals, points of entry/exit (i.e. seaports and airports), primary roads forming the basic network linking State Capitals & major towns and roads within Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya. Normally these roads are under the jurisdiction of the Federal JKR, State JKR or Municipal Councils.

JKR R5/U5 and equivalent

C

Include Regional Development Scheme Roads and Secondary State Roads. These are roads forming the network within regional development areas and secondary roads within districts. These roads are under the jurisdiction of the Federal or State JKR.

Other than JKR R6/U6 or JKR R5/U5

3

D Include urban collector roads and urban local streets. These roads serve as collectors and distributors offering direct access to abutting land.

Urban Roads and Highways

E

Include minor Federal Roads and roads within the village and rural inhabited area. These roads are under the jurisdiction of the Federal JKR, local authorities and District Offices.

Rural and other Federal Roads

1.3.5 Elements Elements are the physical parts of a component as specified below:

Table 2. Road Elements by Components

Component Elements

1. Road Surface Carriageway Shoulder and Verge Median

2. Slope and Retaining Structure

Slope Retaining Structure Slope Drainage Above Ground Services Slope Furniture

3. Drainage

Drain Drain cover Sump Box/pipe culvert

4. Bridge & Other Structures

Above Ground Structures - Road Bridge and Pedestrian

/Motorcycle bridge Special Structures

- Underpass/Vehicular Box Culvert (VBC) & Tunnel

5. Traffic/Road Furniture

Markings Traffic Calming devices Traffic Sign Electrical devices Pedestrian facilities Kerb Traffic Barrier Delineators

1.3.6 QLASSIC Assessor The QLASSIC assessor must have attended the QLASSIC Assessors Certification Training certified by CIDB before carrying out the assessment.

Table 1. Road Category and Description (continued)

4

The QLASSIC assessor shall be continuously updated with the latest QLASSIC practices to ensure consistency and effective implementation of this standard. 1.3.7 Qualified Person A qualified person is defined as the Superintending Officer (S.O.) or as defined by the project contract. 1.3.8 Approved Standard Approved standard shall mean this CIS standard specified by the qualified person for the project. 1.3.9 Tolerance Tolerance shall mean acceptable deviations or permissible values that do not compromise the quality of workmanship. Where applicable, the tolerances are adopted from the normative references. 1.4 Objectives of Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works. Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works was designed and developed to enable the user to achieve all/any of the following objectives:

a) to benchmark the level of quality of the road construction industry in Malaysia; b) to have a standard quality assessment system for workmanship quality of

completed road works;

c) to assess the workmanship quality of a completed road works based on the approved standards;

d) to evaluate the performance of contractors based on the workmanship quality;

e) to encourage continual improvements for contractors; and

f) to compile data for statistical analysis.

1.5 Use of Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works The Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works is intended to complement the best engineering practices, contractual drawings and specifications in a project. It is not intended to be used independently as working specifications. The qualified person shall not use the Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works as a design standard and/or to decide if the road or parts of the road works are in accordance with the relevant Specifications and by-laws. It is still the responsibility of the qualified person to ensure that the quality of the Completed Road Works conform to approved standards, best practices, specifications and drawings. Where accessible and practical, all elements identified in this standard shall be assessed.

5

1.6 Scope of Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works The standard sets out the quality of workmanship for the various aspects of the construction elements for the general road works. The Quality Assessment System for Completed Road Works covers five main components: Road Surface, Slope & Retaining Structure, Drainage, Bridge & Other Structures and Traffic/Road Furniture. Assessments on the workmanship are carried out based on this standard and marks are awarded if the workmanship complies with the standards. These marks are then summed up to give a total score (%) for the road works. However, the assessment excludes works and tests carried out in pre construction and during construction works. The road is assessed primarily on workmanship standard achieved through site inspection and field non-destructive testing. 1.7 Assessment Approach Assessment of the quality of workmanship is carried out upon completion of the road project and preferably, before the road is opened to traffic. This is to ensure that any non-compliance to specific standards is purely based on quality of construction and not from wear and tear of the completed road. The assessor shall inspect and assess the identified samples against the standard and tolerance using the tools specified. Prior to conducting each assessment, the assessor determines the number of samples and locations to be assessed. The number of samples and locations are selected from drawings and plans. The selected samples shall be distributed as uniformly as possible throughout the project length. All locations shall be made available for sample determination. The assessment shall only be limited to this pre-determined sample size and location and is done on the work that is inspected for the first time. Rectification and correction carried out after the quality assessment will not be re-scored. The objective of this practice is to encourage contractors towards “doing things right the first time and every time”. The assessment shall be recorded using the site assessment forms as shown in Annex F to Annex K. An objective ‘yes’ (√) or ‘no’ (x) assessment approach is adopted to indicate compliance or non compliance of the assessed component and its respective elements. A ‘-‘ is given to indicate if the element is not available for assessment. The quality score is computed based on the number of ‘√’ over the total number of elements assessed.

6

SECTION 2: QUALITY STANDARD 2.1 Components The Quality Standards for Completed Road Works are divided into five main components:- 2.1.1 Road Surface The ultimate function of a road is to transport people and goods from one place to another efficiently with a desirable comfort and level of safety.

A road can only serve its function and achieve its designed life if the actual construction is properly done, all the paving materials are of the required standards and meet the required design specifications.

Because the road surface is in direct contact with road users, it is considered the most important component in assessing the quality of a completed road works. The road surface component is further divided into three elements namely carriageway, shoulder & verge and median.

The carriageway is the part of the road where most vehicles are travelling on. The shoulder & verge is the part of the road which is adjacent to the carriageway. Vehicle would not normally use this part of the road as the shoulder act as the emergency lane. Thus the road shoulder is given less importance than the road carriageway. The median is the center part which serves as separator between carriageways.

The elements are assessed in terms of its riding quality, safety and aesthetics as detailed in Annex A. 2.1.2 Slope and Retaining Structure The slope and retaining structure component considered in this standard is only applicable to the structure that is visible after construction.

The functional performance of the slope & retaining structure component has an influence on the safety as well as the comfort of the road user. This component is divided into five (5) main elements: slope (rigid, soft surface cover, rock), retaining structure, slope drainage (surface and subsurface), above ground services and slope furniture.

These elements are assessed in terms of its defect groups such as crack & damage, joint, fillers and gaps, functionality, finishing and installations as detailed in Annex B.

2.1.3 Drainage The functional performance of the drainage system of a completed road works is evaluated to ensure no flooding occurs which may affect the operations of the road.

For the purpose of this standard, this component is further divided into four (4) elements: drain (not included under the Slope and Retaining Structure component), drain cover, sump and pipe/box culverts.

These elements are assessed in terms of its crack & damage, joints & gaps, functionality and finishing as detailed in Annex C.

7

2.1.4 Bridges and Other Structure

The bridge and other structures should be constructed according to approved standards to ensure structural integrity. Repair and rectification works should be avoided as this tends to be very costly, not to mention the inconvenience to the road users. The bridges and other structures component are grouped into the different bridge/structure types: above ground structures (such as road bridges, pedestrian/motorcycle bridges) and special structures (such as underpass/vehicular box culverts and tunnels). Each of these bridges/structures is further assessed in terms of its respective elements as detailed in Annex D. For special structures such as tunnels, where practical and accessible, the assessment shall include all visible elements such as structural, mechanical, electrical, emergency response and fire protection system. Assessment of these elements shall be by visual inspection of its physical conditions and system operational.

2.1.5 Traffic / Road Furniture

The Traffic / Road Furniture ideally cover a wide range of physical fixtures and markings of a road. For the purpose of this standard and for practicality of implementation, this component has been streamlined to only cover elements that will have a direct impact to the traffic operations and flow of a completed road.

The elements covered in this standard are: pavement markings, traffic calming devices, traffic signs, electrical devices, pedestrian facilities, kerbs, traffic barriers and delineators.

These elements are assessed in term of crack & damage, functionality, visibility, finishings and installation as detailed in Annex E. 2.2 Elements For each of the components identified, the elements to be assessed are identified accordingly to facilitate practical assessment and scoring system. The elements and some examples of the type of elements are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. Elements and its Examples

Component Element Example of elements

Carriageway Asphaltic concrete

Shoulder & Verge Paved or unpaved Road Surface

Median Paved or unpaved

Slope Rigid, soft, rock surface

Retaining Structure Facing wall Slope & Retaining Structure Drainage Surface & Subsurface Drainage

8

Table 3. Elements and its Examples (continued)

Component Element Example of elements

Above ground service furniture Water pipes, telecommunication tower

Slope Furniture Handrail and fencing

Drain Roadside, median, shoulder drain

Drain Cover R.C. Slab, M.S Grating

Sump Concrete Sump, Brickwall sump Drainage

Pipe / Box Culverts Culvert Body (Steel & Concrete), Headwall & Wingwall, R.C., C.M.P. Culvert

Above ground structures (bridges)

Road bridge, Pedestrian / Motorcycle bridge

Bridge & Other Structures

Special structures Box culvert, tunnels

Markings Pavement markings, pedestrian Crossing, traffic Ghost Island

Traffic Calming devices Speed hump/table

Traffic Sign Warning, information signs

Electrical devices Traffic Signal, Pedestrian Push Button Signal, Variable Message Sign (VMS), street lighting

Pedestrian facilities Sidewalk, bus stop,

Kerb Roadside, median, traffic island kerb

Traffic Barrier Guardrail, concrete & noise barrier, crash cushion

Traffic / Road Furniture

Delineators Road studs, flexible pole

9

Table 4. Defect Groups for Assessment

Component Element Defect Groups

Road Surface Carriageway, Shoulder & Verge, Median

1. Riding Quality 2. Safety 3. Aesthetic

Slope & Retaining Structure

Slope, Retaining structure, Slope drainage, Above ground services, Slope furniture

1. Crack and damage 2. Joint, filler and gaps 3. Functionality 4. Finishing 5. Installation

Drainage Drain, Drain Cover, sump, pipe / box culvert

1. Crack and Damage 2. Joint and Gap 3. Functionality 4. Finishing

Bridge & Other Structures

Above Ground bridge (Road bridge, Pedestrian / Motorcycle bridge), Special Structures (Underpass / vehicular box culverts, Tunnel)

1. Crack and Damage 2. Joint and Gap 3. Functionality 4. Visibility 5. Finishing 6. Installation

Traffic / Road Furniture Markings, Traffic Calming devices, Traffic Sign, Electrical devices, Pedestrian facilities, Kerb, Traffic Barrier, Delineators

1. Crack and Damage 2. Functionality 3. Visibility 4. Finishing 5. Installation

2.3 Defect Groups

Defect groups represent the parameter to benchmark the quality of workmanship. The defect groups for all components are summarized in Table 4.

10

Fi

gure

1. T

ypic

al R

oad

Cro

ss S

ectio

n

11

Figu

re 2

. Typ

ical

Brid

ge C

ross

Sec

tion

12

SECTION 3: ASSESSMENT The assessment for the completed road work is carried out through a statistical and sampling approach. 3.1 Road Weightage

The road weightage for all components are allocated in accordance to the five road categories. The weightage system is aimed to provide an objective score corresponding to workmanship quality. This weightage is developed based on the drivers’ visual perception and the component’ ability to provide comfort, safety, and assistance (i.e. control) to the driver. It is deemed that each component will have different level of relevance for the different road categories, hence the different weightage as shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Road Weightage for All Components

Weightage by Road Categories (%) Components A B C D E

Road Surface 40 40 40 40 50 Slope & Retaining Structure 15 15 10 10 5

Drainage 10 10 20 20 20

Bridge & Other Structures 15 15 10 10 5

Traffic/Road Furniture 20 20 20 20 20 Total Road Weightage (%) 100 100 100 100 100

3.2 Sampling

As it may be impractical to assess the whole length of the road projects, a sampling approach is recommended. The sample size is developed from the Statistical formula1 of:

N n = 1 + N (ε)² where, n = Sample Size N = Total Length of Road in meters / Total Numbers of Elements ε = Margin of error, the risk/error the assessor is willing to accept,

generally this is ± 5% 1 Elementary Sampling Theory, by Yamane 1967

13

To determine an economical and practical sample size, a range of ε value was tested as follows:

Option Low Medium High

N (m) 1000 1000 1000

ε 10% 6.5% 2.5%

n 9% 19% 62%

From the above range, it is reasonable to adopt a minimum sample size of 20% or a minimum of one (1) complete sample. The maximum sample limit shall be determined by the assessor based on economic and practical considerations. As a further guideline, the assessor may adopt a minimum or a maximum sample size as follows:

• For roads less than 1 km in length, the whole section shall be assessed. • For roads where most elements are available, a minimum sample size of 20% is

sufficient • For roads with limited elements, the following practical sample size is

recommended:

Sample size

Mainline Road Category Intersection* (%) Min Max Length per

sample (km) A 50% 20% 5 km 1

B1 25%

B2 50% 20% 5 km 1

C1 25%

C2 50% 20% 5 km 1

D 25%

E 50% 20% 3 km 0.5

NOTE: * % of the total number of intersections on the project road. The sample shall be selected based on the road chainage and each sample shall, as much as possible, cover all the 5 components to be assessed.

14

3.3 Weightage Guideline for Assessment

3.3.1 Road Surface

The weightage for Road Surface Elements are allocated as per Table 6.

Table 6. Weightage for Road Surface Elements

Weightage % Road Surface Elements Total Breakdown

1. Carriageway 70

Riding Quality 50

Safety 15

Aesthetic 5

2. Shoulder and Verge 20

3. Median 10

Total 100 NOTE: The highest weightage is given to the carriageway element as traffic travels on the road carriageway. Therefore, it is imperative that the carriageway is of the highest quality for functionality and safety reasons. The road shoulder acts as the emergency lane and is given a lower weightage. The lowest is given to the median which do not carry any traffic.

3.3.2 Slope and Retaining Structure

A weightage for the Slope and Retaining Structure component is not applicable as each of the elements is equally relevant in determining the functionality of the slope. The Quality Score will be based on the number of compliance over the total number of elements assessed. 3.3.3 Drainage

The surface and underground drainage are equally relevant in its functionality and are given equal weightage. However, each drainage elements are weighted based on its functionality. For the purpose of the assessment, pipe/box culvert of less than 1.2m in diameter will only be visually inspected at the inlet and outlet of the culvert. Whereas pipe/box culvert of 1.2m or bigger in diameter shall be assessed on all the practical and accessible elements.

15

The weightage for the drainage elements are shown as per Table 7.

Table 7. Weightage for Drainage

Weightage % Drainage Elements Total Breakdown 1. Surface Drain 50

Drain 30

Drain Cover 5

Sump 15

2. Pipe/Box Culvert (Underground) 50 d<1.2m d>1.2m

Culvert Body - 40

Headwall and Wingwall 50 10

Total 100 NOTE: The highest weightage value is given to the drainage element that is most affected in terms of its functionality to carry off water should quality is compromised. The lowest weightage is allocated to drain cover as its function is for safety purposes

16

3.3.4 Bridge and Other Structure

The two (2) elements of this component (i.e. bridges and special structures) are equally weighted as each is equally important in its functionality. However, each of the bridge and other structural elements are weighted based on its functionality.

Table 8. Weightage Guideline for Bridge & Other Structures

Weightage % Bridge & Other Structures Elements Total Breakdown 50 Pier 6 Abutment 6

1. Bridge : Road / Pedestrian / Motorcycle Bridge Bearing Pad 5

Beam 6 Deck Slab 6 Surfacing 5 Expansion Joint 5 Parapet / Handrail 4 Drain Pipe 4 Staircase / ramp 2 Roof 1

50 Structure 9 Road Surface 2

2. Special Structure : Underpass / vehicular box culverts, Tunnel Drainage 2

Road Markings 2 Traffic Signs / VMS 5 Exhaust Fan / Ventilation 5 Fire Protection 5 Lighting 5 Plumbing 2 Fire Detection System 5 Communication System 2 Emergency Power System 2 Power Distribution System 2 Control Panel (control room) 2 TOTAL 100 NOTE: The highest weightage value is given to the structural element that is most affected in terms of its functionality should quality be compromised. Accessories of the bridge (i.e. roof, hand rail, road markings) are given lower weightage as its effect is less severe.

17

3.3.5 Traffic/Road Furniture

The weightage for Traffic/Road Furniture elements are shown in Table 9.

Table 9. Weightage for Traffic/Road Furniture Element

Weightage % Traffic/Road Furniture Elements Total Breakdown

Marking 15 Traffic Calming 10 Speed table 10 Traffic Sign 20 Electrical Devices 15 Traffic Signal 6 Pedestrian Signal 3 Variable Sign 3 Street Lighting 3 Pedestrian Facilities 10 Sidewalk 5 Bus stop 5 Kerb 10 Roadside / Median Kerb 5 Traffic Island 5 Traffic Barrier 10 Guardrail 5 Concrete / Noise Barrier 3 Crash Cushion 2 Delineator 10 Flexible Pole 6 Road Studs 4

TOTAL 100 NOTE: The higher weightage are allocated to the elements that controls traffic flow and gives vital information to traffic. Thus, the lower the effect to the road user, the lower the weightage.

Examples of “good” and “poor” quality of road works are provided in the following pages.

18

Figure 3. Examples of Road Surface Conditions:

Riding Quality:

Joint smoothness ensures good riding quality Poor riding quality caused by undulations

Safety:

Carriageway with sufficient crossfall and superelevation

Improper crossfall causing water to pool

Aesthetic:

Consistence surface colour Surface colour inconsistencies

19

Figure 4. Different Types of Road Surface Defects (Aesthetic):

Cracking Rutting

Shoving Bleeding

Patching Pothole

20

Crack and Damaged:

Proper turfing – soft surface cover Visible Cracks at Rigid Surface

Stabilisation:

Anchorage points firmly fixed Signs of distress

Above Ground Furniture:

Slope furniture securely fixed Poor furniture fixtures

Figure 5. Examples of Slope & Retaining Structure Conditions:

21

Crack & Damaged:

Good Condition of roadside drain Vertical crack at drain wall

Safety:

Grating cover painted and level to frame Poor workmanship of grating cover and sump

Functionality:

Clean culvert inlet/outlet Siltation at culvert inlet/outlet

Figure 6. Examples of Drainage Conditions:

22

Crack & Damaged:

Smooth finishing at parapet Sign of crack at parapet

Joints & Gaps:

Smooth transition at joint Cracked joint

Finishings:

Smooth finishing Sign of distress

Figure 7. Examples of Bridge & Other Structures Conditions:

23

Road kerbs cracked and damaged

Road markings not distinct

Wiring not covered

Crack & Damaged:

Road kerbs in good and clean conditions

Visibility:

Road markings distinct and clean

Finishings:

Proper coverings of electrical wiring

Figure 8. Examples of Traffic/Road Furniture:

24

3.4 Assessment Scoring The quality score of the completed road project is computed based on the number of compliance over the total number of elements assessed and is recorded in the Quality scoring form as shown in Figure 3. The total number of compliance and total number of item assessed as recorded in the site assessment form are summarised in the quality scoring form. The Quality Score for each component is calculated as follows:

Total Compliance Quality Score = Σn

Total Assessed X 100%

where, n = number of components In the event that each element of a component is weightaged, the Quality Score is calculated as follow:

Total Compliance Allocated Weightage Quality Score = Σn

Total Assessed X

Total Actual Weightage X 100%

where, n = number of components The actual weightage is recalculated to take into account items that are not applicable for the specific project. The quality score of each component are further weightage according to the respective road categories to derive the QLASSIC Score as follow:

QLASSIC Score = Σn Quality Score X Road Weightage

where, n = number of components

Figu

re 3

. Exa

mpl

e of

QLA

SSIC

Sco

re F

orm

25

QLA

SS

IC S

cori

ng F

orm

s

ANNEX A (Informative)

QUALITY STANDARDS FOR ROAD SURFACE WORKS

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment Tool

1. CARRIAGEWAY 1a General Requirements

i) Riding Qualtiy

a) Joint smoothness • Construction joints are smooth and flushed

with the pavement surface

As per construction

spec.

3 metre

straight-edge

b) Surface Regularity • Transverse irregularities do not exceed the

allowable limit: Road Category A Road Category B Road Category C Road Category D Road Category E

≤4mm ≤4mm ≤8mm ≤8mm ≤12mm

3 metre

straight-edge

• Roughness (measured in lane IRI) is not more than the specified value

≤2.0m/km

Walking

Profiler or equivalent

• Maximum permissible number of

longitudinal irregularities depth exceeding 4mm over a section length of 75m:

Road Category A Road Category B Road Category C Road Category D Road Category E

≤9 nos. ≤9 nos. ≤18 nos. ≤18 nos. ≤27 nos.

Rolling

Straight Edge

• Maximum permissible number of

longitudinal irregularities depth exceeding 7mm over a section length of 75m:

Road Category A Road Category B Road Category C Road Category D Road Category E

≤1 nos. ≤1 nos. ≤2 nos. ≤2 nos. ≤3 nos.

Rolling Straight Edge

- A 1-

QUALITY STANDARDS FOR ROAD SURFACE WORKS (continued)


1. CARRIAGEWAY (continued) 1a General Requirements (cont’d)

i) Riding Quality

b) Surface Regularity (cont’d) • For longitudinal direction, the maximum

surface irregularities depth must not exceed: Road Category A Road Category B Road Category C Road Category D Road Category E

≤10 mm ≤10 mm ≤15 mm ≤15 mm ≤15 mm

ii) Safety

a) Surface Texture • Surface has sufficient microtexture

As per

construction spec.

Portable Skid

resistance Tester or equivalant

• Surface has sufficient macrotexture

As per

construction spec.

Sand patch or equivalent

b) Gradient • The surface grades, crossfall, and

superelevation are functional with no waterponding

Visual / Inclinometer

iii) Aesthetics a) Surface Appearance, Defects, and Cleanliness

• No visible cracks Visual • No dragging marks

• No obstacles, wastes, loose materials

• Has consistent color

Visual

Visual

Visual

• The road surface has no improper patching Visual

• The road surface has no visible potholes Visual

• The road has no excessive rutting ≤5mm 3 metre straight-edge

• The road has no visible shovings

Visual

• No visible bleeding of the pavement

Visual

• For concrete pavement, no exposed reinforcements

Visual

- A 2-


1. CARRIAGEWAY (continued) 1a General Requirements (cont’d)

iii) Aesthetics b) Joints Appearance

• There are no visible cracking on construction joints

• Construction joints are not constructed on wheelpath

Visual

Visual

2. SHOULDERS AND VERGE 2a General Requirements

i) Safety a) Gradient

• The surface grades and crossfall do not cause waterponding or pose safety hazard

• Height of shoulder should not be higher

than road surface or too low

Not lower

than 50mm

Visual

Inclinometer / Visual / Steel measuring tape

ii) Aesthetics

a) Turfing & Edge Defects

• Appropriate turfing.

• No edge damage

Visual

Visual

b) Surface Appearance, Defects, and Cleanliness

• No visible cracks

Visual

• No dragging marks Visual

• No obstacles, wastes, loose materials Visual

• Has consistent color Visual

• No visible shovings Visual • No undesirable disposal of waste

construction material

Visual

- A 3-

QUALITY STANDARDS FOR ROAD SURFACE WORKS (continued)


3. MEDIAN3a General Requirements

a) Aesthetics a) Turfing & Edge Defects

• Appropriate turfing.

• No edge damage

Visual

Visual

b) Surface Appearance, Defects, and Cleanliness

• No undesirable disposal of waste construction material

Visual

NOTE: This standard is primarily for new roads of flexible pavements. For other types of pavements, specific requirements/standards in terms of surface regularity and surface texture shall be as per contractual agreement.

- A 4 -

ANNEX B (Informative)

QUALITY STANDARD FOR SLOPE & RETAINING STRUCTURE WORKS


1 SLOPES: ROCK, RIGID & SOFT SURFACE COVER 1a. General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible crack, damage and spalling Visual

ii) Joint, Filler and gaps

• No open joints

• No loose rock debris

• No missing or deteriorated joint filler and sealant

Visual

Visual

Visual

iii) Functionality • No eroded area/erosion scar

• No bare slope surface

Visual

Visual

iv) Finishing • No undesirable vegetation growth

• No dead, decaying or unstable trees

Visual

Visual

v) Installation • Contact with soil underneath Visual

1b. Rock Slope

i) Crack and Damage

• No severely corroded anchorage points

• No damaged wire mesh or rock netting

• No signs of cracking and any defects at rock bolt and concrete cover

Visual

Visual

Visual

ii) Installation • Anchorage points must remain intact and firmly fixed to the rock slope

Visual

2 RETAINING STRUCTURE 2a General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No crack, damage and spalling of concrete surface

Visual


• No missing, deteriorated joint filler and sealant

• Gaps between facing panels are free from any undesirable vegetation growth

Visual

Visual

-B 1-

QUALITY STANDARD FOR SLOPE & RETAINING STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)


2 RETAINING STRUCTURE (continued) 2a General Requirements (cont’d)

iii) Functionality • No sign of distress, settlement and tension crack, deformation, tilting and bulging of the retaining structure

Visual

iv) Finishing • Should not have visual exposure of groups of coarse aggregates resulting from grout leakage

• No undesirable vegetation growth

• No debris from defense measures

• No exposed rebar

• No dislocation of masonry blocks

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

3 SLOPE DRAINAGE 3a General Requirements

i) Functionality • Free flowing and no ponding of water

• No accumulated debris, undesirable vegetation and other obstructions in drainage channel

Visual

Visual

3b Surface Drain

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible crack, damage, and spalling Visual


• No missing or deteriorated joint filler and sealant

• No gaps between drainage and soil

Visual

Visual

3c Subsurface Drain

i) Crack and Damage

• No crack, damage and spalling of concrete surface

Visual

ii) Functionality • No traces of seepage

• No obstruction in weepholes and pipe ends

Visual

Visual

-B 2-

QUALITY STANDARD FOR SLOPE & RETAINING STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)


4 ABOVE GROUND SERVICES 4a Surface water carrying services

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage Visual

ii) Functionality • No leaks at exposed water carrying services Visual

iii) Installation • Pipes properly supported and bent without damage

Visual

4b Buried water services

i) Functionality • No signs of water leakage from services Visual and Leak Detection

Equipment 5 SLOPE FURNITURE

5a General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No stain mark

• No visible damage / defect

• No sign of corrosion

Visual

Visual

Visual

ii) Finishing • Level and in alignment Visual

iii) Installation • Secured and safe Visual

-B 3-

ANNEX C (Informative)

QUALITY STANDARD FOR DRAINAGE WORKS


1. DRAIN 1a. General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage e.g cracks, leaks

Visual (1.2m distance from structure)

ii) Joints and Gap • Consistent joint width and neat joint

• Consistent gap

Visual

Visual iii) Functionality • Clear and free from silt, debris and

vegetation growth • Flowing with no obstruction or

ponding water • No erosion or scour in earth

channel

Visual

Visual

Visual

2. DRAIN COVER 2a. General Requirements

i) Joints and Gap

• No gaps between drain covers • No gaps between side of drain

Visual Visual

ii) Finishing

• Covers to be leveled with frames • Grating cover to be properly

painted

Visual Visual

3. SUMP 3a. General Requirements

i) Functionality

• Clear and free from silt, debris and vegetation growth

• Invert level at drain inlet is higher than drain outlet

• Sitting below invert level of incoming drains or culverts

• Free flowing with no obstruction

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

ii) Finishing • Exposed brickwork to be finished with neat joint Visual

- C 1-

QUALITY STANDARD FOR DRAINAGE WORKS (continued)


4. CULVERT 4a General Requirement

i) Functionality ii) Finishing

• Clear and free from silt, debris and vegetation growth

• Recent high water mark at up stream not higher than culvert internal diameter

• No sign of erosion/siltation

• No visible water ponding (For dry culvert)

• Free flowing with consistent gradient (for waterway crossing)

• End of pipe to be normal to the headwall and centerline of the pipe

Visual (Use torchlight)

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual (use ping pong

ball)

Visual

4b Box / Pipe Culvert Body (Steel)

i) Crack and Damage

• No erosion or rusting of steel

• Steel member not fractured

• No permanent deformation

• No paint deterioration

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

ii) Joint and Gap • No loose or missing fastener at connection

Visual

- C 2-

QUALITY STANDARD FOR DRAINAGE WORKS (continued)


4c. Box / Pipe Culvert Body (Concrete)

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage e.g. large or deep cracks, leaks etc.

• Free from rust stain due to corrosion of reinforcement

Visual

Visual

ii) Joint and Gap • Assembled and jointed to line and level

Visual

4d. Headwall and Wingwall

i) Crack and Damage

• No crack through the full thickness of the wall

• No honey combing or open texture

• Free from rust stain due to corrosion of reinforcement

• No sign of erosion, undermining and settlement

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

- C 3-

ANNEX D (Informative)

QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS

Item Element Standards Tolerance Assessment

Tool I. ROAD/PEDESTRIAN/MOTORCYCLE BRIDGE A.

GENERAL REQUIREMENT

1)

Crack and Damage • No horizontal or vertical crack

at concrete structure • No crack or fracture at steel

member

Visual

Visual

B.

PIERS (pile cap& end, pier wall and column)

1)

2)

Crack and Damage • No rust stain/marine growth

at exposed surface • No tilt or settlement

Finishing

• No material deterioration or honey combing

• No concrete discoloration • Formwork joint not visible

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual Visual

C.

ABUTMENTS (Including headwall and wingwall)

1)

2)

3)

4)

Crack and Damage • No deteriorating concrete in

areas that exposed to roadway drainage

• Construction joints at backwalls not crack or move

Finishing

• No rust stain in the exposed concrete

• No stain or patching • No left over foreign material

on finish surface • Formwork joint not visible

Functionality • Drains and weep holes are

clear and functioning properly • No sign of erosion around the

abutment

Installation • Interlocking abutment (if any)

properly installed

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

-D 1-

QUALITY STANDARD FOR BRIDGE AND OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)


D.

BEARING PADS

1)

2)

3)

Crack and Damage • No splitting or tearing, either

vertically or horizontally

• No bulging on the sides of the pads caused by excessive compression

Finishing

• No debris/vegetation or ponding water

• No variable thickness other

than due to normal rotation of the bearing

Functionality

• No abnormal flattening due to overloading

• No displacement

< 3mm

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Steel measuring

tape E.

STEEL BEAM/GIRDER

1)

2)

3)

Crack and Damage • Steel members show neither

corrosion nor rusting Joints and Gap

• No loose or missing fastener Finishing

• No deformation of steel member

Visual

Visual

Visual

-D 2-



F.

CONCRETE BEAM/ GIRDER (Beam, Cross beam)

1)

Finishing • No spalling concrete,

especially at point of bearing

• Expose concrete surface free from rust stains due to corrosion of reinforcement

• Disintegrated concrete at

area exposed to roadway drainage

• Debris and standing water

not appear at the top of cross beams

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

G.

STEEL DECK SLAB

1) Crack and Damage • Steel members are not

corroded • No deformation of steel

members

• Slab free from water leaking Joints and Gap

• No loose or missing fastener at connection

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

-D 3-



H.

CONCRETE DECK SLAB

1)

2)

Crack and Damage

• No surface defect especially near the expansion joint

Finishing

• No map cracking of wearing surface which develop by reflection cracking of concrete deck

• Smooth riding transition from one pavement segment to the next

Visual

Visual

Visual

I.

SURFACING

1)

Finishing • Pavement in good condition

with no potholes or cracks • Proper crossfall • For pedestrian bridge, finish

materials are properly install • No loss of bond and

delamination • No wheel track rutting • No settlement/depression at

approach slab to abutment

Visual

Visual Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

J.

EXPANSION JOINT

1)

2)

Crack and Damage • No water leaking • No difference in level

• No abnormal spacing Finishing

• Securely fixed/using appropriate material

≤ 10mm

Visual

Steel

measuring tape

Visual

Visual

-D 4-



K.

DRAIN PIPES

1)

2)

3)

Crack and Damage • Pipes not damage

Functionality • Drain opening and outlet

provided and no clogging • Evenness of scupper drain • No entrapped water which

cause deterioration • No sand and debris at drain

opening • No sign of leaking

Installation • Proper drain direction • Hanger properly located and

spacing.

Visual

Visual

Visual Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual Visual

L.

PARAPET/HANDRAIL

1)

2)

3)

4)

Crack and Damage • No impact damage or

spalling at concrete Joints and Gap

• Concrete expansion joint to be neat

Installation • Handrail joint provided at

correct location • Bridge parapet consistently

align to road carriageway • Hand railing properly fixed • No loose or missing

fasteners at every joints of steel member

Finishing • Consistent painting for steel

railing • Neat concrete finishing at all

jointing

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

-D 5-



M.

RAMP/STAIRCASE (PEDESTRIAN/RAMP BRIDGE)

1)

2)

Finishing • Consistent friction between

ramp surface and motorbike tyre

• Staircase with consistent step height and landing width

• Ramp with safe gradient for motorbike

Installation

• Ramp/staircase aligned with pedestrian walkway

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

N.

ROOF (PEDESTRIAN/RAMP BRIDGE)

1)

2)

Crack and Damage • No crack or damage

Finishing

• Roof properly fixed with no loose jointing

Visual

Visual

-D 6-



II. UNDERPASS/VEHICULAR BOX CULVERT AND TUNNEL

A.

GENERAL REQUIREMENT

1)

2)

3)

Crack and Damage • No water leakage or water

penetration through concrete/steel surface

• No settlement occur in

transition area Joints and Gap

• No loose or missing connection bolt of fabricated concrete, steel and cast iron liners.

• Gasket between segmental

tunnel liners not dislodged from the joint.

Finishing

• Colour of wall to be bright and clean

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

B.

CONCRETE STRUCTURE

1)

Crack and Damage • No crack or scaling on

structure

Visual

C.

STEEL STRUCTURE

1)

Crack and Damage • Steel members are not

corrosion and crack

• No buckles and kinks

Visual

Visual

-D 7-



D. ROAD SURFACE

1)

Finishing • Pavement in good condition

with no pot-holes, cracks or wheel track rutting

• Proper crossfall

• No loss of bond and

delimitation

Visual

Visual

Visual

E. TRAFFIC SIGN

1)

2)

Crack & Damage • No visible damage (not bend,

broken or dented) Visibility

• Distinctly visible

Visual

Visual F. MARKINGS

1)

Visibility • Marking is distinct and clean • Recto reflective of road marking

Visual

Visual

G. DRAINAGE

1)

2)

Crack and Damage • No visible damage e.g.

cracks, leaks Functionality

• Capable of handling water flow

• Sump pumps are clear of debris to permit free flow through the drain

Visual

Visual

Visual

H. VENTILATION SYSTEM (Fan, airway, louver, motor operated and dampers)

1)

2)

Finishing • All equipment in good

condition Functionality

• Fan and associated motor –operated dampers are operational

• Airways (where accessible) are free of obstruction and debris

Visual

Visual

Visual

-D 8-



I. CONTROL PANEL

1) Functionality • Control panel indicators are

functioning

Visual

J. PLUMBING SYSTEM

Crack and Damage • Piping is free of leakage

Functionality

• Plumbing fixtures are properly install and function

Visual

Visual

K. FIRE PROTECTION (Fire extinguishers, hose connections, piping, pumping system, circulation pumps and hose reels)

1)

2)

3)

Installation • All equipments are properly

fixed.

Finishing • Fire protection storage tanks,

alarm and level switches in good condition

Functionality

• Fire control panel is functioning

Visual

Visual

Visual

L. POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

1)

2)

3)

Crack and Damage • No sign of damage and

overheating equipment • No damage or corrosion of

wiring system Installation

• Enclosure box covers and conduit are in place and secure

Functionality

• Motor controller properly operate

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

-D 9-



M. EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM

1)

Functionality • System is functioning when

the normal power fails

N. LIGHTING SYSTEM

1)

2)

3)

Crack and Damage • No visible damage of all

lightings • Bulb not burnt out

Installation

• Lighting is properly fixed and clean

Functionality

• Sufficient lighting provided • Lighting with different ranges

of nighttime and daytime illumination

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

Visual

O. FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM

1)

2)

Crack and damage • Drill switch in good condition

Functionality

• Annunciators and notification appliances are functioning

Visual

Visual

P. COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (SCADA, CCTV Cameras, telephone and radio)

1)

Functionality • Communication devices are

functioning • Traffic signals properly

operate

Visual

Visual

-D 10-

ANNEX E (Informative)

QUALITY STANDARD FOR TRAFFIC / ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS


1. PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1a General Requirements

i) Visibility • Marking is distinct and clean

• Recto reflective of road marking

White= 90mcd/lx.m², Yellow= 65mcd/lx.m²

Visual

Drive on road (night) and

Rectro reflective-meter

ii) Finishing • No other patches and spray and crack on the painting

• Markings is aligned to the edge line of the road

Visual

Visual

2. TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES 2a Speed Hump / Speed Table

i) Visibility • Painting is distinct and clean Visual

ii) Finishing • Interlocking pavers are properly interlocked with no missing pavers

Visual

3. TRAFFIC SIGN 3a General Requirement

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty)

Visual

ii) Functionality • Mounted facing the direction of the traffic that is being served

Visual

iii) Visibility • Sign face and painting is distinct, no paint peeling and no debris on the signs

• Sign face is not obstructed by any object

• Night time visibility

Visual

Visual

Visual (Flash with Torch light)

iv) Installation • Pole is sturdy, straight and secure Physical/Plumb Bob/Spirit level

-E 1-

QUALITY STANDARD FOR TRAFFIC / ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS (continued)


Tool3. TRAFFIC SIGN (continued)

v) Finishing • Proper joint and no visible gap of the sign face

• Paint of the sign pole is clean & no patches

Visual

Visual

4 ELECTRICAL DEVICES : TRAFFIC/PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL, STREET LIGHTING, MESSAGE SIGNS4a General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty) Visual

ii) Functionality • All light bulb / LED are lighted

• Push button facility is operational when pressed

• Lighting covers the traffic lane continuously i.e. no zebra effect/ blackspot

Visual

Visual

Visual

iii) Visibility • Distinct and clear

• Facing the traffic lane served

Visual

Visual

iv) Finishing • Paint is clean i.e. no bleeds or patches

• Reflective border is clear and not peeling

• Made good for the footing & its surrounding

Visual

Visual

Visual

v) Installation • Pole is sturdy and vertically straight

• Wire is hidden and wire casing is closed

• No displaced grass/landscape at foundation

• All components must securely installed

Physical/Visual/Plumb Bob/Spirit

level

Visual

Visual

Visual

5 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES

5a Sidewalk and railing

-E 2-

i) Crack and Damage


ii) Finishing • Surface is even and flat

• Paint is clean and distinct

• No overgrown grass

Visual

Visual

Visual



Tool 5 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES (continued) iii) Installation • Railing is sturdy

Physical/Visual

5b Bus Stop (includes seats and railings)

i) Crack and Damage

• No sign of leaking

• Fixtures are not damaged

Visual

Visual

ii) Finishing • No overgrown grass or trees • All components must properly painted

Visual Visual

iii) Installation • Fixtures are sturdy Physical/Visual

6 KERB : ROAD SIDE, MEDIAN, TRAFFIC ISLAND

6a General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage


ii) Finishing • No overgrown grass

• Paint is clean and distinct (no patches or bleeding )

• Joint is not too wide

25mm (desirable)

Visual

Visual

Steel ruler

iii) Installation • Kerbs are installed consistently align to the alignment

Visual

7 TRAFFIC BARRIER

7a Guardrail

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty)

Visual

ii) Visibility • Distinct and clean

• Reflective strips are clearly to be seen

Visual

Visual

iii) Finishing • No displaced grass/pavement at foundation / made good to the foundation

• Consistently aligned to the carriageway

Visual

Visual

-E 3-



7 TRAFFIC BARRIER (continued)

iv) Installation • Guardrail post is secure

• W-beam is securely bolted to the splice and post

• Guardrail joint is not against the traffic flow

Physical/Visual

Visual

Visual

7b Concrete & Noise Barrier

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, cracked or chipped)

Visual

ii) Visibility • Paints are distinct & clean, no debris and no patches

• Reflective strips / sheets are clean and not bend

Visual

Visual

iii) Finishing • No overgrown grass

• No discolouration

Visual

Visual

7c Crash Cushion

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, dented, cracked)

Visual

ii) Visibility • Reflective strips are clean Visual

iii) Finishing • No overgrown grass Visual

iv) Installation • Cartridge is inflated

• Crash cushion is facing on-coming traffic flow

Visual

Visual

8 DELINEATOR: ROAD STUDS, FLEXIBLE POLE 8a General Requirements

i) Crack and Damage

• No visible damage (broken, dented, cracked)

• Reflective sheet not peeling

Visual

Visual

ii) Visibility • Reflective and clearly seen

• Seen during night time

Visual

Visual (night time drive)

iii) Installation • Securely installed

• Consistently aligned to the road carriageway

Visual / Physical

Visual

-E 4-

ANNEX F

B D

QLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORMComponent 1: Road SurfaceProject Name: Assessor 1:Project ID: Assessor 2:Road Category: Date:Carriageway Type: Single/DualType of Surfacing :

Element Carriageway Shoulder and Verge Median

Sample Riding Quality Safety Aesthetics Safety Aesthetics Aesthetics

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Total Compliance

Total Assessment

*Tolerance Table General Category A & Category C & Category ERiding Quality

i) Joint Smoothness ≤ 3 mmii) Surface regularity

- Traverse irregularities ≤ 4 mm ≤ 8 mm ≤ 12 mm- Lane IRI ≤ 2.0m/km- Longitudinal irregularities (depth >4mm over 75m) ≤ 9 nos ≤ 18 nos ≤ 27 nos- Longitudinal irregularities (depth >7mm over 75m) ≤ 1 nos ≤ 2 nos ≤ 3 nos- Maximum surface irregularities ≤ 10 mm ≤ 15 mm ≤ 15 mm

Safetyi) Microtexture As per Construction Specificationsii) Macrotexture As per Construction Specifications

Aesthetici) Rutting ≤ 5 mm

Defect Group

- F1 -

QLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORMComponent 2: Slope and Retaining StructuresProject Name: Assessor 1:Project ID: Assessor 2:Road Category: Date:Carriageway Type: Single/Dual

Elements Slopes * RetainingStructure Slope Drainange Above Ground Service Slope Furniture

GeneralRequirements

RockSlope

GeneralRequirements

GeneralRequirements

SurfaceDrain

SubsurfaceDrain

Surface Water Carrying

BuriedWater

GeneralRequirements

Sample Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Join

t, Fi

ller &

Gap

s

Func

tiona

lity

Fini

shin

g

Inst

alla

tion

Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Inst

alla

tion

Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Join

t, Fi

ller &

Gap

s

Func

tiona

lity

Fini

shin

g

Func

tiona

lity

Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Join

t, Fi

ller &

Gap

s

Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Func

tiona

lity

Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Func

tiona

lity

Inst

alla

tion

Func

tiona

lity

Cra

ck &

Dam

ages

Fini

shin

g

Inst

alla

tion

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Sample ______ (km From ____ to ____)

Left

Right

Total Compliance

Total Assessment

NOTE:* = included rock slope, rigid and soft surface cover

DefectGroup

ANNEX G

- G1 -

QLASSIC ASSESSMENT FORM

Component 3: Drainage

Project Name: Assessor 1:

Project ID: Assessor 2:

Road Category: Date:

Carriageway Type: Single/Dual

SURFACE DRAIN CULVERTS (BOX/PIPE)

DRAIN DRAIN COVER SUMP CULVERT BODY (RC/STEEL) HEADWALL & WINGWALL

Sample Cra

ck &

Dam

age

Join

t & G

ap

Func

tiona

lity

Cra

ck &

Dam

age

Join

t & G

ap

Fini

shin

g

Cra

ck &

Dam

age

Fini

shin

g

Func

tiona

lity

Cra

ck &

Dam

age

Join

t & G

ap

Func

tiona

lity

Fini

shin

g

Cra

ck &

Dam

age

Fini

shin

g

Sample _______ (KM From ___ to ____)

Left

Median

Right

Sample ______ (KM From ____ to ____)

Left

Median

Right

Sample ______ (KM From ____ to ____)

Left

Median

Right

Sample ______ (KM From ____ to ____)

Left

Median

Right

Sample ______ (KM From ____ to ____)

Left

Median

Right

Sample ______ (KM From ____ to ____)

Left

Median

Right

Total of Compliance

Total of Assessed

DefectGroup

ANNEX H

- H1 -

AN

NEX

I1

QLA

SSIC

ASS

ESSM

ENT

FOR

MC

ompo

nent

4: A

bove

Gro

und

Stru

ctur

es :

Roa

d/Pe

dest

rian/

mot

orcy

cle

Brid

ge

Pro

ject

Nam

e:A

sses

sor 1

:

Pro

ject

ID:

Ass

esso

r 2:

Roa

d C

ateg

ory:

Dat

e:

Car

riage

way

Typ

e: S

ingl

e/D

ual

Crack & Damage

Finishing

Crack & Damage

Functionality

Finishing

installation

Crack & Damage

Functionality

Finishing

Crack & Damage

Joint & Gap

Finishing

Crack & Damage

Finishing

Crack & Damage

Joint & Gap

Crack & Damage

Finishing

Crack & Damage

Finishing

Crack & Damage

Finishing

Crack & Damage

Functionality

Installation

Crack & Damage

Joint & Gaps

Finishing

installation

Finishing

Installation

Crack & Damage

Finishing

Left

Rig

ht

Left

Rig

ht

Left

Rig

ht

Left

Rig

ht

Left

Rig

ht

Left

Rig

ht

NO

TE :

Sam

plin

g gu

ide

for G

irder

/bea

m, P

ier a

nd B

earin

g P

ad a

t eac

h br

idge

. Ran

dom

sam

ple

sele

cted

and

mar

ked

on A

s B

uilt

Dra

win

g be

fore

insp

ectio

n.

1. L

ess

than

50

num

bers

= 5

num

bers

sam

ple

2. 5

1 to

100

num

bers

= 1

0 nu

mbe

rs s

ampl

e

3. M

ore

than

100

num

bers

= 1

5 nu

mbe

rs s

ampl

es

Elem

ents

Abo

ve g

roun

d St

ruct

ures

Dra

in P

ipe/

Dra

in O

peni

ngPa

rape

t / H

andr

ail

Ram

p /

Stai

rcas

eR

oof

Surf

acin

gEx

pans

ion

Join

tPi

erA

butm

ents

Bea

ring

Pad

Stee

l Bea

m /

Gird

erC

oncr

ete

Bea

m /

Gird

erSt

eel D

eck

Slab

Con

cret

e D

eck

Slab

Sam

ple

____

_ (k

m _

____

_

Tota

l Com

plia

nce

Tota

l Ass

esse

d

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

____

(k

m _

____

_

Sam

ple

____

_ (k

m _

____

_

Sam

ple

____

_ (k

m _

____

_

Sam

ple

____

_ (k

m _

____

_

Sam

ple

____

_ (k

m _

____

_

Def

ect

Gro

up

- I1 -

AN

NEX

I2

QLA

SSIC

ASS

ESSM

ENT

FOR

MC

ompo

nent

4: U

nder

pass

/Veh

icul

ar B

ox C

ulve

rt a

nd T

unne

l

Pro

ject

Nam

e:A

sses

sor 1

:

Pro

ject

ID:

Ass

esso

r 2:

Roa

d C

ateg

ory:

Dat

e:

Car

riage

way

Typ

e: S

ingl

e/D

ual

Con

cret

eSt

ruct

ure

Stee

l Str

uctu

reR

oad

Surf

ace

y

cn

eg

re

mE

le

na

P

lo

rt

no

Cs

gn

ik

ra

MPo

wer

Sys

tem

Fire

Det

ectio

n Sy

stem

Com

mun

icat

ion

Syst

emCrack & Damage

Joint & Gap

Finishing

Crack & Damage

Crack & Damage

Finishing

Crack & Damage

Visibily

Visibily

Crack & Damage

Functionality

Functionality

Finishing

Functionality

Crack & Damage

Functionality

Functionality

Finishing

Installation

Functionality

Crack & Damage

Functionality

Installation

Crack & Damage

Functionality

Installation

Functionality

Functionality

Left

Rig

ht

Left

Rig

ht

Left

Rig

ht

Left

Rig

ht

Left

Rig

ht

Und

erpa

ss /

Vehi

cula

r Box

Cul

vert

s an

d Tu

nnel

Dra

inag

eVe

ntila

tion

Syst

emPl

umbi

ngSy

stem

Traf

fic S

igns

n

oi

tu

bi

rt

si

D

re

wo

Pn

oi

tc

et

or

P

er

iF

Syst

emLi

ghtin

g Sy

stem

Gen

eral

Req

uire

men

ts

Tota

l Ass

esse

d

Elem

ents

Sam

ple

Sam

ple

____

__

(km

Fro

m _

___

to _

___)

Sam

ple

____

__

(km

Fro

m _

___

to _

___)

Sam

ple

____

__

(km

Fro

m _

___

to _

___)

Tota

l Com

plia

nce

Sam

ple

____

__

(km

Fro

m _

___

to _

___)

Sam

ple

____

__

(km

Fro

m _

___

to _

___)

Def

ect

Gro

up

- I2 -

AN

NEX

J

QLA

SSIC

ASS

ESSM

ENT

FOR

M

Com

pone

nt 5

: Tra

ffic/

Roa

dsid

e Fu

rnitu

reP

roje

ct N

ame:

Ass

esso

r 1 :

Pro

ject

ID:

Ass

esso

r 2:

Roa

d C

ateg

ory:

Dat

e:C

arria

gew

ay T

ype:

Sin

gle/

Dua

l

Ele

men

tP

avem

ent

Mar

king

sTr

affic

Cal

min

g D

evic

esTr

affic

Sig

nE

lect

rical

Dev

ices

*P

edes

trian

Fac

ilitie

sK

erb*

*Tr

affic

Bar

rier

Del

inea

tor*

**

Gen

eral

Req

uire

men

tsS

peed

Hum

p /

Tabl

eG

ener

al R

equi

rem

ents

Gen

eral

Req

uire

men

tsS

idew

alk

& R

ailin

gB

us s

top

(Sea

ts &

raili

ng)

Gen

eral

Req

uire

men

tsG

uard

rail

Con

cret

e &

Noi

se B

arrie

rC

rash

Cus

hion

Gen

eral

Req

uire

men

ts

Sam

ple

Visibility

Finishing

Visibility

Finishing

Crack & Demage

Functionality

Visibility

Installation

Crack & Demage

Functionality

Visibility

Finishing

Installation

Crack & Demage

Finishing

Installation

Crack & Demage

Finishing

Installation

Crack & Demage

Finishing

Installation

Crack & Demage

Visibility

Finishing

Installation

Crack & Demage

Visibility

Finishing

Crack & Demage

Visibility

Finishing

Installation

Crack & Demage

Visibility

Installation

Sam

ple

___

(km

Fro

m

____

____

to

____

_)

Left

Med

ian

Rig

ht

Sam

ple

___

(km

Fro

m

____

____

to

____

_)

Left

Med

ian

Rig

ht

Sam

ple

___

(km

Fro

m

____

____

to

____

_)

Left

Med

ian

Rig

ht

Sam

ple

___

(km

Fro

m

____

____

to

____

_)

Left

Med

ian

Rig

ht

Sam

ple

___

(km

Fro

m

____

____

to

____

_)

Left

Med

ian

Rig

ht

Tota

l Com

plia

nce

Tota

l Ass

essm

ent

NO

TE:

* =

incl

ude

Traf

fic /

Ped

estri

an S

igna

l, S

treet

Lig

ht, M

essa

ge S

ign

** =

incl

ude

Roa

d si

de, M

edia

n an

d Tr

affic

isla

nd k

erbs

***

= in

clud

e R

oad

Stu

ds a

nd F

lexi

ble

Pol

e

Def

ect

Gro

up

- J1 -

ANNEX K (Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF ROAD SURFACE WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECTGROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE

• Joints are smooth and flushed

As per Construction Specifications

A 4mm B 4mm C 8mm D 8mm

• Maximum Transverse Regularity

E 12mm • International

Roughness Index≤ 2 m/km

>4mm >7mm >10mm >15mm A 9 nos. 1 nos. 0 0 B 9 nos. 1 nos. 0 0 C 18 nos. 2 nos. 2 nos. 0 D 18 nos. 2 nos. 2 nos. 0

Riding Quality

• Maximum number of longitudinal regularities exceeding allowable limit, over a traverse length of 75m

E 27 nos. 3 nos. 3 nos. 0 • Microtexture As per Construction Specifications • Macrotexture As per Construction Specifications

Safety

• Gradient Water drainable (No water ponding)

Carriageway

Aesthetics • No cracks/dragging marks/patching

• No loose material/potholes

• No excessive rutting • No shovings/ bleedings • No exposed

reinforcement (concrete)

• Joints not cracked/on wheelpath

≤5mm

- K 1 -

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF ROAD SURFACE WORKS (continued)

ELEMENTS DEFECTGROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE

Safety • No waterponding • Shoulder not too low

Not lower than 50mm

Shoulder and Verge

Aesthetics

• No cracks/dragging marks/patching

• No loose material/potholes

• No overgrown turfing • No damaged edge of

pavement • No shovings/ bleedings • No undesirable

construction waste

Median

Aesthetics • No overgrown turfing • No damaged edge of

pavement • No undesirable

construction waste

- K 2 -

ANNEX L (Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF SLOPE & RETAINING STRUCTURES WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE Crack & Damages • No visible crack, damages and spalling

• No corroded anchorage points (rock slope) • No damaged wire mesh/rock netting

Joints, filler & gaps • No open joints/loose debris • No missing/deteriorated fillers/sealant

Functionality • No eroded area/bare surface Finishing • No undesirable vegetation/dead /unstable

trees

Slope

Installation • Contact with soil underneath • Anchorage is intact & firmly fixed (rock slope)

Crack and Damage • No visible crack, damages and spalling Joint, fillers & gap • No missing/deteriorated fillers/sealant

• No undesirable vegetation at panel gaps Functionality • No signs of distress, settlement, deformation,

tilting, bulging

Retaining Structure

Finishing • No exposed aggregates/rebar • No undesirable vegetation • No dislocation of masonry blocks

Crack & Damage • Crack, damage and spalling Joint, fillers & gaps • No missing and deteriorated joint

fillers/sealant• No gaps between drainage & soil (surface

drain)

Slope Drainage

Functionality • No seepage • No obstruction in weepholes/pipe ends

Crack & Damage • No visible damage/ Functionality • No leaks

Above ground services

Installation • Pipes properly supported, not damaged Crack & Damage • No stain marks/visible damage/corrosion Finishing • Level and in alignment

Slope Furniture

Installation • Secured/sturdy

- L1 -

ANNEX M (Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR DRAINAGE WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE Crack and Damage

• No visible damages/cracks

Joint and Gap • Consistent joint width and neat • Consistent gap

Drain

Functionality • Clear and free from silt/debris/vegetation • Free flowing with no ponding water • No visible erosion or scouring in earth

channel Joint and Gap • No gaps between drain covers, side of drain Drain Cover

Finishing • Covers level with frame • Gratings painted properly

Functionality • Clear and free from silt/debris/vegetation • Free flowing with no ponding water • Inlet invert level is higher than outlet • Sitting below invert level of incoming drain

Sump

Finishing • Neat joints

Crack and Damage

• No erosion/rusting/deformation (steel culvert) • No honey combed/open texture

(headwall/wingwall)

Functionality • Clear and free from silt/debris/vegetation • Water mark level at up stream not higher

than culvert internal diameter • Free flowing with consistent gradient and no

ponding (dry culvert) Jointing and Gap • Assembled and jointed to line and level

(concrete culvert) • No loose or missing fastener (steel culvert)

Crack and Damage

• No visible damage/defect

Culvert

Finishing • End pipe normal to headwall and centre • Surface smooth and even • Free from rust stain

- M 1 -

ANNEX N (Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF BRIDGE & OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE Crack and Damage • No visible crack/defect/fracture

• No corrosion/ fracture/deformation of steel members

• No tilt/settlement (pier, expansion joint) • No deterioration of concrete (abutment) • No splitting/tearing/bulging (bearing pads) • No abnormal spacing (expansion joint) • No leakages (drain pipes)

Jointing and Gap • No cracked joints (abutment, joint) • No loose/missing fastener (steel

beam/girder, slab, roof)

Functionality • Drains/weepholes/outlets are clear • No abnormal flattening (bearing pads) • No debris / ponding water (beams, slab,

drain) • Evenness (scupper drain)

Finishing • No deterioration/honey comb (pier, beam) • No debris/vegetation/ponding (bearing pads) • No variable thickness other than normal

rotation (bearing pads) • No deformation of steel members (steel

beam/girder) • No spalling concrete • No rust stains • No pot holes (surface) • Proper crossfall (surface) • No rutting (surface) • Consistent painting • Consistent step height & landing width

(stairs) • Safe gradient (motorcycle ramp)

Above ground structure / bridge

Installation • Hanger properly located and spaced (drain pipes)

• Fixtures securely fixed (handrail) • Consistently aligned to road (parapet) • Ramp/staircase aligned to pedestrian

walkway

- N 1 -

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF BRIDGE & OTHER STRUCTURE WORKS (continued)

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE Crack and Damage • No water leakages

• No settlement • No crack/spalling • No corrosion/buckle/kinks • No visible damage/cracks • No overheating (equipments)

Jointing and Gap • No loose/missing connection bolt • No dislodged gasket

Underpass / Vehicle Box Culvert, Tunnel

Functionality • No ponding • Clear of debris/obstruction (drain, airways) • Equipments are operational (dampers, control

panel, fire control, communication) • Equipments are operational when power failure

(emergency power system) • No burnt bulbs • Consistent lighting (no blackspots/zebra

effects) Finishing • Clean wall

• No potholes/cracks/wheel track rutting (surface)

• Proper crossfall • No loss of bond/delamination (surface) • Equipments in good condition/clean

Visibility • Markings is distinct (pavement marking) • Recto reflective of road markings

Installation • Equipments are securely installed (lightings, electrical equipments)

• Box covers are in place & secured

- N 2 -

ANNEX O (Informative)

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC & ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE Visibility • Marking is clearly seen

• Night time visibility PavementMarkings

Finishing • No other patches / crack • Properly / uniformly align

Visibility • Marking is clearly seen Traffic CalmingDevice Aesthetic • No missing pavers

Crack & Damage • No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty) Functionality • Sign is facing on-coming traffic Visibility • Marking is clearly seen

• Night time visibility Installation • Sturdy & straight

Traffic Sign

Finishing • No visible gap & proper joint of the signage face • Paint of the signage pole is clean & no patches

Crack & Damage • No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty) Functionality • All bulb & LED is lighted

• Push button is functional when pressed • No blackspot and zebra effect

Visibility • Message/Symbol is clearly seen Finishing • Paint/reflective border is clean/not peeling

• Made good at foundation

Electrical Devices

Installation • Sturdy & straight • Wiring is hidden & covered • No displace turfing at foundation

Crack & Damage • No visible damage (broken, dented, rusty) • No leakage (bus stop)

Finishing • Surface is flat & even • Paint is clean • No overgrown grass

Pedestrian Facilities

Installation • Fixtures are sturdy Crack & Damage • No visible damage (crack, broken) Finishing • No overgrown grass

• Painting is clean • Kerb joints not too wide

Kerb

Installation • Consistently aligned to road

- O 1 -

DEFECT GROUP FOR ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC & ROADSIDE FURNITURE WORKS (continued)

ELEMENTS DEFECT GROUP DEFECT DESCRIPTION TOLERANCE Crack & Damage • No visible damage (crack, broken, dented) Visibility • Clearly seen (day & night) Finishing • No displaced grass at foundation

• No discolouration (concrete/noise barrier) • Consistently aligned to road

Traffic Barrier

Installation • Post is secure/securely bolted • Joint is not against traffic flow • Cartridge is inflated (crash cushion)

Crack & Damage • No visible damage (crack, broken) Visibility • Clearly seen (day & night)

Delineator

Installation • Securely installed • Consistently aligned to road

- O 2 -

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The committee which developed this Malaysian Construction Industry Standard consists of the following representatives:

Ir Sia Han See (Chairman : 2009 - 2010 April) Construction Industry Development Board Ir Mukhtar Che Ali (Chairman : 2010 May - Present) Construction Industry Development Board Mohammad Faizal Bin Abdul Hamid (Secretary) Construction Industry Development Board

Ir Shamsuddin Bin Sabri / Highway Planning Unit, Ministry of Abdul Aziz Bin Ahmad Works, Malaysia

Zahratul `Ula Binti Mohamad Ibrahim/ Mohd Faizan Ibrahim Malaysia Highway Authority

Ir Assoc Prof Adnan Bin Zulkiflie/ Ir Chin Kar Keong The Institution of Engineers Malaysia

Ir Anuar Bin Abdul Mohd Aris/ The Association of Consulting Engineers Ir Hamzah Bin Ismail Malaysia

Asmaniza Binti Asnan/ Johari Jivisol Abdullah PLUS Expressway Berhad

64

standardcis195!5!11 (quality assessment system for completed road works)

Documents