statcom - final slides for lecture
TRANSCRIPT
STATCOMDr. Biswarup Das
Department of Electrical Engineering
IIT Roorkee
12-pulse inverter using delta/open and star/open connection of six-pulse units.
12-pulse waveforms created from two sets of six-pulse waveforms
True 48 pulse configuration
True 48 pulse STATCOM waveform
Diagram of quasi-48 pulse STATCOM
Voltage waveforms of two six-pulse converters (V1Y, V1Δ) and
four phase-shifted 12-pulse converters (Va1, Va2, Va3, Va4)
Quasi-48-pulse STATCOM waveforms.
Multi-pulse STATCOM
• For true 48 pulse, 8 zig-zag transformers
with tertiary winding are needed
• In quasi 48 pulse, ordinary transformers
are sufficient
• Transformer complexity and cost is more
in true 48 pulse than in quasi 48 pulse
• Indirect control of multi-pulse STATCOM
Multi-level inverters
• Diode clamped
• Flying capacitor
• Cascaded H-bridge
H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter
Basic Module Output voltage
Constraint: S1 ≠ S2; S3 ≠ S4
Types of H-bridge Multilevel Inverters
1. Cascade H-Bridge
2. Hybrid H-Bridge
3. Quasilinear
4. New Hybrid (Trinary)
Cascade H-Bridge multilevel Inverter
Level Number= 2S+1
Where,
S= Number of stages
All DC source
voltages are of
equal ratings
Cascade H-bridge Inverter
a) Circuit diagram b) waveform showing 9-level converter phase voltage
Cascade H-bridge Inverter
• For an M-level inverter (M-1)/2 Full Bridge
Inverters (FBI) are required
• The output phase voltage is synthesized by
the sum of all inverter outputs
3- stage Cascade H-bridge
Possible combinations for 3-stage Cascade
H-bridge Inverter
VDC
Vout
-3V -2 V -1 V 0 V 1 V 2 V 3 V
1 V
1 V
1 V
N
N
N
N N 0
N 0 N
0 N N
N N P 0 0 N
N P N 0 N 0
P N N N 0 0
0 0 N P N P 0
N P 0 0 P N 0
P N P N 0 0 0
P 0 0 N P P
0 P 0 P N P
0 0 P P P N
0 P P
P 0 P
P P 0
P
P
P
Cascade seven level 3 phase inverter
Waveform of cascade seven level inverter
Hybrid (binary) H-Bridge Multilevel
Inverter
Level Number
= 2s+1 – 1
(a) 3-stage BMVSI (b) output waveform
Possible combinations for 3-stage
Hybrid H-bridge Inverter
VDC
Vout
-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
1 V
2 V
4 V
N
N
N
0
N
N
P N
N 0
N N
0
0
N
P N N
0 N P
N 0 N
0 0
N P
0 N
N P P
0 N P
0 0 N
0
0
0
P N N
0 P N
0 0 P
0 0
P N
0 P
P N P
P 0 N
0 P P
4 5 6 7
0
0
P
P N
0 P
P P
0
P
P
P
P
P
Binary seven level 3 phase inverter
Waveforms of binary seven level inverter
Advantages
• Stage with higher DC link voltage has Lower number of commutations
Lower associated switching loss
• Higher DC link voltage consists of lower switch frequency component (IGCT)
• Lower DC link voltage consists of higher switching frequency components (IGBT)
Quasi-linear multilevel inverter
3 stage quasi-linear inverter: a) circuit diagram b) waveform
Possible combinations for 3-stage
Quasilinear inverter
VDC Vout
-9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1
1V
2V
6V
N
N
N
0
N
N
P N
N 0
N N
0
0
N
P N
0 P
N N
0
P
N
P N
P N
N 0
0
N
0
P N
N 0
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
0
0
P N
0 P
0 0
0
P
0
P N
P N
0 P
0
N
P
P N
N 0
P P
0
0
P
P N
0 P
P P
0
P
P
P
P
P
Terniary multilevel inverter
3-Stage New Hybrid Inverter
Possible combinations for 3-stage Terniary
Inverter
VDC
Vout
-13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1
1V
3V
9V
N
N
N
0
N
N
P
N
N
N
0
N
0
0
N
P
0
N
N
P
N
0
P
N
P
P
N
N
N
0
0
N
0
P
N
0
N
0
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
0
0
0
P
0
0
N
P
0
0
P
0
P
P
0
N
N
P
0
N
P
P
N
P
N
0
P
0
0
P
P
0
P
N
P
P
0
P
P
P
P
P
V K(max) V out (max)Level number
Cascade VDCS VDC 2S + 1
Hybrid 2 S - 1 VDC (2S-1) VDC 2S+1 - 1
Quasi-linear 2 * (3 S-2) VDC (3S – 1) VDC 2*3S-1 + 1
New Hybrid 3S-1 VDC ((3S-1)/2) VDC 3S
Reference
1. Y. S. Lai and F. S. Shyu, “Topology for
hybrid multilevel inverter”, IEE proc.-Electr.
Power Appl., Vol. 149, No. 6, November 2002.
Page(s): 449-458.
Cascaded multilevel inverter
Solution procedure
Chain-link converter based STATCOM
Basic circuit
Voltage waveform of a 3 link (7 level) chain converter
(2N+1) level output phase voltage waveform of a CLS with “N” links per phase.
References
1. J. D. Ainsworth et al., “Static VAr compensator
(STATCOM) based on single-phase chain circuit
converters”, IEE Proc. Generation,
Transmission, Distribution, Vol. 145. No. 4, July
I998, pp: 381-386.
2. Nikunj M. Shah, Vijay K. Sood and Venkat
Ramachandran, “EMTP Simulation of a Chain-
Link STATCOM”, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON
POWER DELIVERY,VOL. 23, NO. 4,OCTOBER
2008, pp: 2148-2159.
Basic indirect control scheme (Fig. HG_5.35)
Direct control scheme (Fig. HG_5.36)
Operating V-I characteristics of STATCOM (Fig. HG_5.37)
Loss Vs. output characteristics of a 48 pulse, 100 MVAR STATCOM
(Fig. HG_5.38)
Combined characteristics of a STATCOM-FC (Fig. HG_5.39)
Combined characteristics of a STATCOM-fixed reactor (Fig. HG_5.40)
Combined characteristics of a STATCOM-TSC-TCR SVC (Fig. HG_5.41)
Loss Vs. output characteristics of different static VAR generator systems
(Fig. HG_5.42)
General control scheme of a static VAR generator (Fig. HG_5.43)
Implementation of the slope in the V-I characteristics of a STATCOM
(Fig. HG_5.44)
V-I characteristics of a SVC and STATCOM (Fig. HG_5.45)
VAR reserve control
Diagrammatic representation of the concept of VAR reserve control (Fig. HG_5.56)
Equal area criterion to demonstrate improvement of transient stability with
shunt compensation (Fig. HG_5.5
Improvement of transient stability by STATCOM and SVC;
a) STATCOM and b) SVC (Fig. HG_5.62)
VS VR
P+jQ
jX
2 4 2 2 2( 2 ) 4 4
2
s s s
R
V QX V QXV P XV
Voltage stability limit of a radial line without any compensation
VS VR
P+jQ
jX
STATCOM
Voltage stability limit of a radial line with shunt compensation