state corporate income apportionment key...
TRANSCRIPT
State Corporate Income
Apportionment Key Fundamentals Understanding Trends and State Approaches to Factor Weighting,
Service Revenue, Joyce vs. Finnigan and Other Apportionment Concepts
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
Please refer to the instructions emailed to the registrant for the dial-in information.
Attendees can still view the presentation slides online. If you have any questions, please
contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 2013
Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A
Richard Call, Attorney, Morrison & Foerster, New York
Kelly Brown, Director, State and Local Tax Group, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Boston
Marianne Evans, Senior Manager, KPMG, Washington, D.C.
For this program, attendees must listen to the audio over the telephone.
Tips for Optimal Quality
Sound Quality
Call in on the telephone by dialing 1-866-570-7602 and enter your PIN when
prompted.
If you have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. You may also
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address
the problem.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
Continuing Education Credits
Attendees must stay on the line throughout the program, including the Q & A
session, in order to qualify for full continuing education credits. Strafford is
required to monitor attendance.
Record verification codes presented throughout the seminar. If you have not
printed out the “Official Record of Attendance,” please print it now (see
“Handouts” tab in “Conference Materials” box on left-hand side of your computer
screen). To earn Continuing Education credits, you must write down the
verification codes in the corresponding spaces found on the Official Record of
Attendance form.
Please refer to the instructions emailed to the registrant for additional
information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service
at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Program Materials
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please
complete the following steps:
• Click on the + sign next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-
hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a
PDF of the slides and the Official Record of Attendance for today's program.
• Double-click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
State Corporate Income Apportionment Key Fundamentals Seminar
Kelly Brown, PricewaterhouseCoopers
May 15, 2013
Richard Call, Morrison & Foerster
Marianne Evans, KPMG
Today’s Program
Business Vs. Non-Business Income
[Richard Call]
Apportionment Formula Key Concepts
[Richard Call]
Sales Factor
[Kelly Brown and Marianne Evans]
Property Factor
[Richard Call]
Payroll Factor
[Marianne Evans]
Specific Industry Apportionment
[Kelly Brown]
Combined/Consolidated Return Issues
[Richard Call]
Latest Important Developments
[Kelly Brown]
Slide 8 – Slide 10
Slide 40 – Slide 44
Slide 45 – Slide 50
Slide 51
Slide 11– Slide 14
Slide 15 – Slide 26
Slide 27 – Slide 33
Slide 34 – Slide 39
Notice
ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY
THE SPEAKERS’ FIRMS TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY
OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT
MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR (ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR
RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.
You (and your employees, representatives, or agents) may disclose to any and all persons,
without limitation, the tax treatment or tax structure, or both, of any transaction
described in the associated materials we provide to you, including, but not limited to,
any tax opinions, memoranda, or other tax analyses contained in those materials.
The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are
subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be
determined through consultation with your tax adviser.
BUSINESS VS. NON-BUSINESS INCOME
Richard Call, Morrison & Foerster
9
Apportionable V. Non-Apportionable Income
• Constitutional framework
• Apportionment formula may only apply to “apportionable” income.
• The U.S. Constitution prohibits a state from apportioning income
that has no connection to the taxing state.
• Statutory framework
• Many states use a statutory term, “business income,” to
determine what income is apportioned to the state.
• Non-apportionable or non-business income can be specifically
allocated by statute.
10
What Is Apportionable Income?
• Constitutional framework
• To be apportionable, income must come from a “unitary” business.
• Indicators of a unitary business are flows of value, which have been
expressed as:
• Functional integrations
• Centralization of management
• Economies of scale
• Statutory framework
• Historically, “business income” was defined in UDITPA as “income arising
from transactions and activity in the regular course of the taxpayer’s trade or
business and includes income from tangible and intangible property if the
acquisition, management, and disposition of the property constitute integral
parts of the taxpayer’s regular trade or business operations.”
• Some states define “business income” as all income apportionable under the
Constitution.
APPORTIONMENT FORMULA KEY CONCEPTS
Richard Call, Morrison & Foerster
This is MoFo. 12
Apportionment
U.S. Supreme Court precedent has interpreted the Commerce Clause to require fair apportionment.
What is fair apportionment?
Do taxpayers have a right to apportion? If so, when?
Apportionment formula must reasonably reflect how income is generated.
This is MoFo. 13
What Factors Are Used?
This is MoFo. 14
Weighting Of Factors
SALES FACTOR
Kelly Brown, PricewaterhouseCoopers
Marianne Evans, KPMG
Notice
ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED
OR WRITTEN BY KPMG TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED,
BY A CLIENT OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE
PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING
PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR (ii)
PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER
PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.
You (and your employees, representatives, or agents) may disclose to any and all persons,
without limitation, the tax treatment or tax structure, or both, of any transaction described in
the associated materials we provide to you, including, but not limited to, any tax opinions,
memoranda, or other tax analyses contained in those materials.
The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are
subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined
through consultation with your tax adviser.
16
Sales Factor: What Is Included?
I. UDITPA refers to “total sales” but defines “sales” as “all gross
receipts of the taxpayer not allocated.”
II. The MTC regulations specify that “sales” includes “all gross
receipts derived by the taxpayer from transactions and
activity in the regular course of the trade or business.”
17
Sales Factor: What Is Excluded?
I. MTC regulations exclude:
A. Substantial amounts of gross receipts from the occasional
sale of fixed assets used in the taxpayer’s business
B. Insubstantial amounts that do not materially affect the
factors
C. Receipts on which the IPA cannot be localized
II. States have specific exclusions:
A. Receipts other than receipts from the principal business
activity
B. Receipts from sale of certain assets
C. Receipts from income not included in the tax base
18
Slide Intentionally Left Blank
Sales Factor: Gross Receipts Or Net Gain?
I. UDITPA and the MTC regulations refer to “gross receipts.”
II. However, the MTC regulations were amended in 2001 and now
provide that only the “overall net gain” from the sale,
exchange or other disposition of “liquid assets” in a taxpayer’s
“treasury function” are included.
A. Only a few states have adopted this modification to the
MTC regulations (e.g., HI, ID, UT).
B. Other states have similar rules that allow inclusion of only
net gains on sales of intangible property (e.g., IL).
20
Sales Factor: Sourcing Of Sales Of TPP
I. UDITPA
A. Sales of TPP are in this state if the property is delivered or
shipped to a purchaser, other than the U.S. government,
within this state.
II. MTC regulations
A. Does not matter if the property is ordered from another
location
B. Does not matter if purchaser subsequently transfers the
property to another state
C. Drop shipments: Sourced to where the ultimate recipient
of the property is situated (your customer’s customer)
21
Sales Factor Sourcing: Dock Pick-up Sales
I. “… delivered or shipped to a purchaser … within this state”
A. Does “within this state” modify “delivered or shipped” or
“purchaser”?
II. If the purchaser picks up goods at seller’s dock and then
transports them to another state for use, to which state are
the sales sourced?
A. Most state courts have held that such sales are sourced to
the state of ultimate destination.
22
Sales Factor: Throwback
I. UDITPA
A. Sales of TPP are in this state if the property is shipped from an
office, store, warehouse, factory or other place of storage in this
state, and the taxpayer is not taxable in the state of the
purchaser.
II. How do UDIPTA and/or the MTC regulations define “taxable in the
state of the purchaser”?
A. Being subject to a net income tax, franchise tax for the privilege
of doing business, or a corporate stock tax in another state
B. Another state having the right to impose a net income tax, even
if it does not actually impose such a tax
23
Sales Factor: Sourcing Of Non-TPP Sales
I. UDITPA
17
A. Sales, other than sales of TPP, are in this state if:
1. The income-producing activity (IPA) is performed in
this state, or
2. The IPA is performed both in and outside this state,
and a greater proportion of the IPA is performed in this
state than in any other state based on costs of
performance.
24
Sales Factor: Definitions
I. IPA - MTC Reg. IV.17.(2)
A. IPA “applies to each separate item of income and means
the transactions and activity directly engaged in by the
taxpayer in the regular course of its trade or business for
the ultimate purpose of obtaining gains or profits.”
II. Costs of performance - MTC Reg. IV.17.(3)
A. Direct costs determined in a manner consistent with
generally accepted accounting principles and in
accordance with accepted conditions or practices in the
trade or business of the taxpayer
25
Sales Factor: Market-Sourcing Issues
I. How do you determine where a service is received?
II. How do you define the benefit of a service?
III. How do you determine where the benefit is received?
IV. When do you “look through” to the ultimate customer or
ultimate marketplace?
V. What is a fixed or regular place of business?
26
PROPERTY FACTOR
Richard Call, Morrison & Foerster
This is MoFo. 28
Property Factor
Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (UDITPA)
Owned and leased real and tangible personal property are included
in the factor.
Owned property is valued at its original cost unless original cost is
not known; then, FMV at time of acquisition is used.
Leased property is valued at 8 times the annual rental amount.
The factor is determined by using an average of beginning- and end-
of-year values.
Storage fees – Multistate Tax Commission Reg. IV.11(b)(3)
“A taxpayer stores part of its inventory in a public warehouse. The
total charge for the year was $1,000 of which $700 was for the use of
storage space and $300 for inventory insurance, handling and
shipping charges, and C.O.D. collections. The annual rent is $700.”
This is MoFo. 29
Property Factor (Cont.)
Movable property
Multistate Tax Commission Reg. IV.10(d)
“The value of mobile or movable property such as construction
equipment, trucks or leased electronic equipment which are
located within and without this state during the tax period shall be
determined for purposes of the numerator of the factor on the
basis of total time within the state during the tax period.”
“An automobile assigned to a traveling employee shall be
included in the numerator of the factor of the state to which the
employee's compensation is assigned under the payroll factor or
in the numerator of the state in which the automobile is licensed.”
This is MoFo. 30
Property Factor (Cont.)
In-transit property
“Property in transit between locations of the taxpayer to which it
belongs shall be considered to be at the destination for purposes of
the property factor.” Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18,
25129(d)
Inventory in transit from one state to another is not included in the
denominator of the property factor. N.J. Admin. Code
18:7-8.4(c)(3)
Maryland required inclusion of the value of automobiles on the high
seas in the Maryland numerator, despite the fact that in-transit
inventory was not addressed in the property factor statute.
Mercedes Benz of N. Am., Inc. v. Comptroller of Treasury, Dkt. No.
2813, (Md. Tax Ct. Oct. 7, 1988)
This is MoFo. 31
Property Factor For Banks
Loans in property factor
Minnesota - Minn. Stat.
290.191, Subd. 11
Secured loans are attributable to Minnesota if the security is in
Minnesota.
Unsecured consumer loans or consumer loans secured by
intangibles are attributed to Minnesota if the loan was made to a
resident of Minnesota.
Unsecured commercial loan and installment obligations are
attributable to Minnesota if the proceeds of the loan are to be
applied in Minnesota.
Loans will generally include credit card receivables.
This is MoFo. 32
Property Factor For Banks (Cont.)
Loans in property factor (Cont.)
MTC
A loan is considered to be located within this state if it is properly
assigned to a regular place of business of the taxpayer within this state.
A loan is properly assigned to the regular place of business with which it
has a preponderance of substantive contacts.
To determine the state in which the preponderance of substantive contacts relating to a loan have occurred, the facts and circumstances regarding the loan at issue shall be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and consideration shall be given to such activities as:
Solicitation
Investigation
Negotiation
Approval
Administration
This is MoFo. 33
Property Factor
Meredith Corp. (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Is programming delivered via satellite TPP includable in the property
factor?
Policy change
When litigation commenced, programming delivered via videotape
was considered TPP by the department.
The department changed its policy via a TSB to exclude
programming delivered by videotape.
“This record establishes that programming on videotape had long been
considered by the Department as tangible property for purposes of the
property factor, and … there is no rational distinction for taxation
purposes between programming sent to a station on videotape and
programming sent via satellite.”
PAYROLL FACTOR
Marianne Evans, KPMG
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member fi rms affiliated with
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A.
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. Not for distribution to clients unless the technical and policy review requirements of Tax Services Manual section 23.7 are satisfied.
Notice
ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT
INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY KPMG TO BE USED, AND
CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY OTHER PERSON
OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING
PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR
(ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO
ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.
You (and your employees, representatives, or agents) may disclose to any and all persons,
without limitation, the tax treatment or tax structure, or both, of any transaction described in the
associated materials we provide to you, including, but not limited to, any tax opinions,
memoranda, or other tax analyses contained in those materials.
The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject
to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through
consultation with your tax adviser.
35
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member fi rms affiliated with
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A.
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. Not for distribution to clients unless the technical and policy review requirements of Tax Services Manual section 23.7 are satisfied.
Payroll Factor: What Is Included?
Total amount paid to employees for compensation
− Includes salaries, commissions, other taxable remuneration
− Per the taxpayer’s accounting method – accrual or cash
− Includes payroll capitalized as part of cost of asset, for book or tax
purposes
− May elect to use cash method if compensation reported under cash
method for unemployment tax purposes
Payroll related to production of non-business income is excluded
Payroll paid to an employee in an “no-nexus”/P.L. 86-272 state is
included in denominator
36
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member fi rms affiliated with
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A.
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. Not for distribution to clients unless the technical and policy review requirements of Tax Services Manual section 23.7 are satisfied.
Payroll Factor: What Is Included? (Cont.)
If the factor includes the total compensation paid to employees,
who qualifies as employees?
− Officers?
− Independent contractors?
− “Leased employees”?
− Others?
37
Slide Intentionally Left Blank
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member fi rms affiliated with
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A.
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. Not for distribution to clients unless the technical and policy review requirements of Tax Services Manual section 23.7 are satisfied.
Hierarchy Of Payroll Sourcing
A. The state in which the employee’s services are wholly or substantially
performed, if services performed outside of that state are incidental
(temporary or transitory) or rendered in connection with isolated
transactions
B. The state in which the employee’s base of operations is located, if
some part of the services are performed in that state
C. The state from which the employee is directed or controlled, if some
part of the services are performed in that state
D. The state in which the employee resides
39
SPECIFIC INDUSTRY APPORTIONMENT
Kelly Brown, PricewaterhouseCoopers
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 41
Special Industry Apportionment
• Three-factor formula works best for merchandising and manufacturing
businesses. States allow other formulas, by statute and by taxpayer
appeal.
• Construction: Include work in progress
• Athletes: Use duty-days
• Motion pictures: Use audience data
• Service providers: Use sales or payroll factors only
• Transportation: Use in-state miles, passenger-miles, train car-miles, ton-
miles, time in-port
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 42
Special Industry Apportionment (Cont.)
• Insurance companies: Use premium dollars written
• Mutual funds, banks: Use deposits, number of clients, number of cards
issued
• Communications: Use cable-miles, circulation, number of satellite
stations on the ground
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 43
Alternative Apportionment Method
• States may allow department to require, or taxpayer to request, use of an
alternative apportionment method.
• Usual goal is to prevent distortion or clearly reflect income in state.
Slide Intentionally Left Blank
COMBINED/CONSOLIDATED RETURN ISSUES
Richard Call, Morrison & Foerster
This is MoFo. 46
Combination
Combined report typically includes unitary members of the combined
group on either a worldwide or water’s edge basis.
Inter-company transactions within the group may be eliminated, for
apportionment purposes.
Joyce/Finnigan
Partnership factor flow-up
This is MoFo. 47
Combination (Cont.)
Appeal of Joyce (Cal. SBE 1966)
SBE held that a company’s receipts from sales of TPP, shipped to
California by a seller that was not taxable in California because of
P.L. 86-272 but was part of a unitary business conducted in California,
could not be included in the California sales factor numerator.
Joyce rule treats each combined group member as a separate entity, for
apportionment purposes. Unless an entity has stand-alone nexus, its sales
are not included in the sales factor numerator.
Effects – Combined group members may have to throw back sales not
subject to tax in other states in which other combined group members are
subject to tax.
This is MoFo. 48
Combination (Cont.)
Appeal of Finnigan (Cal. SBE 1990)
SBE overruled Joyce and held that when a combined group member
has sales to another state in which the combined group member is
not taxable, but in which other unitary combined group members are
taxable, the combined group member’s sales to that state are not
subject to throwback.
Finnigan rule treats all combined group members as one entity, for
apportionment purposes.
Effects – All combined group members’ sales that are sourced to
California are included in the numerator, regardless of whether the
individual combined group member is subject to tax in California.
This is MoFo. 49
Combination (Cont.)
Partnership factor flow-up
How does a state treat the apportionment factors of a partnership or
LLC when income from those entities is included in the tax base?
Are the factors of the partnership included in computing the tax?
California
Factors of the partnership flow up if the taxpayer and partnership
are engaged in a unitary business.
Factors of the partnership do not flow up if the partnership is in a
different line of business.
Slide Intentionally Left Blank
LATEST IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENTS
Kelly Brown, PricewaterhouseCoopers