state of michigan: request for proposal · ghfaa proposal, page 2 part 1: technical proposal . i...

SSttaattee ooff MMiicchhiiggaann:: RReeqquueesstt ffoorr PPrrooppoossaall

22001133 IInnddeeffiinniittee--SSccooppee,, IInnddeeffiinniittee--DDeelliivveerryy GGeenneerraall PPrrooffeessssiioonnaall DDeessiiggnn SSeerrvviicceess

((AArrcchhiitteeccttuurree,, EEnnggiinneeeerriinngg,, LLaannddssccaappee AArrcchhiitteeccttuurree)) VVaarriioouuss LLooccaattiioonnss,, MMiicchhiiggaann

DDuuee DDaattee:: MMaayy 1166,, 22001133

TTiimmee DDuuee:: 22::0000ppmm LLooccaall TTiimmee

ORIGINAL

Submitted by:

G.H.Forbes Associates Architects, PC 225 S. Main Street; Suite 200 Royal Oak, Michigan 48067

248.542.7866 www.ghfaa.com

SSuubbmmiitttteedd ttoo::

MMiicchhiiggaann DDeeppaarrttmmeenntt ooff TTeecchhnnoollooggyy,, MMaannaaggeemmeenntt aanndd BBuuddggeett FFaacciilliittiieess aanndd BBuussiinneessss SSeerrvviicceess AAddmmiinniissttrraattiioonn DDeessiiggnn aanndd CCoonnssttrruuccttiioonn DDiivviissiioonn SStteevveenn TT.. MMaassoonn BBuuiillddiinngg 553300 WWeesstt AAlllleeggaann SSttrreeeett,, 22nndd FFlloooorr LLaannssiinngg,, MMII 4488990099

2013 Indefinite-Scope Indefinite-Delivery Department of Technology, Management and Budget GHFAA Proposal, page 1

Table of Contents

PART 1 - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: ............................................................................................................. ….2

I - 1 Understanding of Project Tasks ..............................................................................................................2 I - 2 Personnel.................................................................................................................................................4 I - 3 Management Summary and Work Plan/Schedule ..................................................................................6 I - 4 Questionnaire for Professional Services .............................................................................................. 10

PART 2 - COST PROPOSAL:………………………………………………………………………………………… 11

II-1A - Position, Classification & Employee Billable Rate Information………………………………………….11 Appendices

Appendix A – Questionnaire for Professional Services Appendix B – Key Personnel Resumes Appendix C – Project Examples

Appendix D – Quality Control Documents • Sample Meeting Report Template

• Sample Field Report Template

• Mechanical Field Survey Checklist

• Michigan Building Code Construction Documents Checklist


PART 1: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

I – 1 Understanding of Project and Tasks

The State of Michigan Department of Technology Management and Budget (MDTMB) requests the services of a Professional Service Contractor (PSC) to design and provide construction services for various locations throughout the State of Michigan. I-1A. Experience with Governmental or Institutional Design and Construction: GHFAA has been providing professional architectural services for over forty years. We provide innovative and technical renovations for clients including the General Services Administration (GSA) and the Department of Technology, Management and Budget (DTMB). We are experienced in achieving design and technical requirements of various agencies including the Department of Military and Veteran Affairs (DMVA), Federal Bureau of Investigations, United States Coast Guard, United States Marshals Service, Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and the Internal Revenue Service. Many of these agencies have requirements for SIPR rooms, vaults, supply storage and offices similar to requirements of DTMB’s client agencies. We recently completed the renovation of the Reserve Forces Services Center North Building 31. This was a phased project with the DTMB and the DMVA to renovate a three story concrete structure with brick veneer. GHFAA coordinated the phases and worked with the State to achieve the desired renovation within budget limitations. During the project we received positive feedback from both DTMB and DMVA regarding follow-through on meeting and field reports, project coordination and communication. We are confident that we can again meet the needs of the DTMB and their clients in a smooth and timely manner. In addition to the renovation project mentioned above, we have several active projects with the DTMB. We have completed the design for the Detroit Light Guard Armory Modifications Phase 3 and expect to start construction this spring. Design for Phase 4 of the Detroit Light Guard Armory Renovation is underway. Design of the Washtenaw Parking Improvements project is nearly complete and construction is anticipated late this summer. We are also designing the Washtenaw Armory Renovation to address the interior, lobby and exterior roof and masonry renovation. We are familiar with the phases of work including the Study, Program Analysis, Schematic Design, Preliminary Design, Final Design and Construction Administration, both field and office. We understand how critical construction cost estimating is to assess and maintain budget throughout a project. We are familiar with the process of submitting drawings for review by the State Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA). GHFAA has enjoyed three consecutive Indefinite Deliverables, Indefinite Quantities (IDIQ) Contracts with the General Administration Services (GSA). Each of these contracts is for one year with an option to be renewed for an additional four years. Our IDIQ contract began in 1995 and based upon successful performance, we have been awarded the IDIQ contract into 2012. GHFAA is currently under consideration for another IDIQ contract. GHFAA has completed more than one-hundred twenty (120) projects for the GSA over the past 15 years and has earned exceptional ratings from project managers throughout GSA. We have provided the full gamut of services for these GSA projects including feasibility studies, design intent documents, design review, procurement support, site investigations, project development studies, building evaluation reports, conceptual designs, renderings, construction drawings, specifications, record drawings, proposal evaluations, cost estimating, shop drawings and construction management and inspection. Our projects also have addressed historic preservation, multiple phases, sustainable design practices and GSA’s Workplace 20/20 which rethinks office space to maximize resources and facilitate modern work practices. The GSA work varies widely from high-end design such as a Judge’s Chambers to more engineering-centric projects like an electrical switchgear replacement and we treat each project with the utmost importance. Our


successful history with GSA IDIQ contracts makes us well suited to offer superior service to the State of Michigan through the ISID contract. We understand that the State of Michigan is dedicated to conserving energy. Often, projects do not attempt to achieve a certification in Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) yet the principles are still applicable. Our project team has LEED Accredited Professionals for Architectural, Mechanical and Electrical disciplines and routinely incorporate water conservation, energy efficiency and finishes that promote indoor air quality in our designs. Most of our work tends to be alterations and renovations of existing facilities, many of which are historic. We work with the Property Managers and consider maintenance needs during design. We work with GSA’s Historic Preservation branch to ensure that the character of the facility is preserved. We work with clients including the Courts, Marshals and Department of Homeland Security to provide programming, schematic design and design development that reflects both the local agencies needs as well as the design guide standards that are specific to that agency. We also produce timely and thorough construction documents. We routinely perform construction management and inspection services and serve as the inspector for code enforcement when projects occur on federal property. I-1B. Why GHFAA is the best value to the State of Michigan: GHFAA is the best value to the State of Michigan due to past experience, understanding of the agency clients, dedication to responsive service and collaborative efforts. Our experience with renovations is perhaps the most important component of our qualifications. Over the last 15 years, approximately 75% of our projects have been renovation projects; all with varying degrees of complexity. The renovations have included all aspects of interior and exterior construction and all disciplines including architectural, mechanical, electrical, civil, structural, environmental, acoustical and fire protection. Our typical project size is similar to the project size mentioned in the RFP; our professional fee is less than $35,000 in approximately 40% of our projects. We understand the importance of prompt and thorough service on projects of all size. We view our field survey as an essential component of a successful project and do not skimp on the hours spent in the building to thoroughly document existing conditions and to coordinate the renovation work. We have developed internal checklists to help ensure that all aspects of the existing conditions are investigated. These checklists help to make sure we leave no stone unturned and help us to identify for the owner where potential risks or hidden costs may be. We have found that this approach to field investigation creates a great foundation for our construction documents and thereby reduces the number and cost of change orders that occur during construction. We’ve also developed an understanding of good renovation products such as patching materials. Through our experience and dedication, we have created the foresight to understand potential problems before they arise during construction. We understand that projects will require close collaboration and frequent communication. Our design team includes architects and engineers that have successfully collaborated for 19 years. Even though our engineers are not in the same office, we communicate throughout the day, every day. Our team offices have a wealth of experience working together on projects. Also, our team’s knowledge and enforcement of the building codes is critical. On our multitude of Federal projects, we have been acting as their construction inspectors for the past fifteen years. This will be a critical asset in State projects where local inspectors do not have jurisdiction and State inspectors are often overburdened. Our office is located in southeast Michigan. Most project sites in the State are within 2 hours of driving time, which allows for us to make day trips during the design and construction phases. This means that our time


can be spent directly interfacing with the State and managing the construction instead of traveling to and from the site. Our inexpensive billing rate also allows us to maximize our interface time without creating an exorbitant total fee. Lastly, we believe that having a good working relationship with the general contractor is critical to a smooth and successful project. Our team believes in fostering an environment of mutual respect with the contractor which has paid dividends as evidenced by several design-build projects.

I – 2A. Key Personnel

I – 2 Personnel

The resumes of each member of GHFAA’s project team that are expected to participate on projects under this Contract are included as Attachment B. Emphasis has been placed on resumes for those personnel and specialists who will have major project responsibilities.

Project Manager/Principal Architect (key employee) Scott Goodsell, AIA –Point of Contact

Architect (key employee) Theresa Scherwitz, LEED AP

Principal Engineer (key employee) Scott Garrison

Electrical Engineer (key employee) Eric Graettinger, PE, LEED AP

Mechanical Engineer (key employee) David Conrad, PE


I – 2B. Organization Chart An Organization Chart (Figure 1) illustrates the proposed project leadership and reporting responsibilities with the lines of communication of our proposed project team. The individuals identified are key to the successful completion of these project types. Roles for a typically assigned project are noted in italics.

Figure 1 — GHFAA Organization Chart

DTMB Irene Henry

GHFAA Manager Scott Goodsell Project Oversight, Consultant Coordination, Project Management, Management of Staff, Contract Negotiations, Cost Estimating

Architect Theresa Scherwitz Design, LEED Design and Documentation, Code Research and Interpretation, Consultant Coordination, Project Management, Managing CAD technicians, Coordination of Consultant’s Drawings, Cost Estimating, Field Inspections Professional Staff Les Key Project Management, Cost Estimating, Field Inspections Draftsperson Grant Jeffries CAD technician, Unit estimates, Coordination of Consultant’s Drawings

Administrative Staff Carol Rorick Billing, Accounting, Shipping, Processing Deliverables

Consulting Electrical Engineer Eric Graettinger Project Management Managing CAD technicians Cost Estimating Field Inspections Consulting Mechanical Engineer David Conrad Project Management Managing CAD technicians Cost Estimating Field Inspections

CLIENT AGENCY

Consulting Engineer Manager Scott Garrison Project Oversight, Consultant coordination, Project Management, Management of Staff, Contract Negotiations, Cost Estimating


I – 3 Management Summary and Work Plan/Schedule

I-3A. Work Plan and Methodology The work plan outlined below reflects a typical project plan based upon our previous related experience. For each project, we would develop a schedule through discussions with the MDTMB. PHASE 100 – STUDY Task 101 – Coordination: Project Kickoff MeetingGHFAA will meet with the Department of Technology, Management and Budget (DTMB) as well as the client agency to receive background information including design guides and existing drawings. GHFAA will facilitate the meeting, and record and publish meeting minutes within 3 days of the meeting.

1 Day

Task 102 – Research: Document Existing ConditionsGHFAA and the project team will visit the site to document existing conditions. We will inquire with the State for relevant building drawings as well as survey results regarding asbestos containing materials (ACM) and lead based paint (LBP).

1-3 Weeks

Task 103 – Analysis: Generate ReportGHFAA will generate a report of the findings in Task 102. The report is anticipated to include architectural and engineering sketches, summary of spaces, physical features and systems. This report will be critical in laying the groundwork for the Design Charette.

2-3 Weeks

Government Review: 1 Week PHASE 200 – PROGRAM ANALYSIS Task 201 – Coordination: Design CharetteGHFAA will facilitate a Design Charette with the entire project team to identify program. This Charette will be critical to define the scope requirements of each phase of the renovation.

1 Day

Task 203 –Development: OptionsGHFAA will develop three options in response to the program elements identified in the Design Charette in Task 201.

2-3 Weeks

PHASE 300 – SCHEMATIC DESIGN Task 301 – Coordination: 10% DesignGHFAA will present the three options developed under Task 203 to the State for consideration. GHFAA will facilitate the meeting, and record and publish meeting minutes within 3 days of the meeting.

1 Day

1 Week Task 307 – Architectural/Engineering: Survey & DesignGHFAA will research and field survey the existing conditions to verify scope of renovation.

1-2 Week

Task 308 – Drafting:GHFAA will prepare CAD based drawings.

2-3 Weeks

Task 309 – Project Cost:GHFAA will provide a budgetary construction cost estimate.

Concurrent

PHASE 400 – PRELIMINARY DESIGN


Task 401 – Present 35% Review Documents:GHFAA will present 35% Review Documents, which will include the following deliverables:

1 Day

• Architectural Plans, Elevations, Sections and Schedules in CAD based drawings • Architectural Specifications • Calculations/Supporting Design Data

Architectural Design Narrative Life Safety Code Analysis Mechanical Design Narrative Design References including codes, design guides and publications Electrical Design Narrative

• Budgetary Cost Estimate

Government Review: 1 Week

Task 402 – Specifications:GHFAA will prepare a preliminary design outline draft specification in C.S.I format.

1 Week

Task 407 – Architectural / Engineering:GHFAA will coordinate design. PBA will calculate loads and prepare the preliminary design for mechanical/heating, ventilating, and air conditioning as well as plumbing systems. PBA will determine electric service requirements and develop and outline basic equipment and distribution systems for lighting, power, fire, data and communications. Prepare preliminary design electrical drawings. Comments from 35% submittal will be incorporated and engineering drawings will be coordinated with architectural. All comments will be responded to in narrative form.

2-3 Weeks

Task 408 – Drafting:CAD based drawings will be prepared.

Concurrent

Task 409 – Project Cost:The budget construction cost estimate will be developed and itemized by specification section.

Concurrent

Task 410 – Preliminary Design Review:GHFAA will submit the 65% Review Documents.

Concurrent

The Drawing Components of the 65% Review Documents will include:

• Architectural Plans, Sections, Elevations and Schedules • Fire Alarm • Plumbing • HVAC • Lighting (building interior) • Power and Data

The 65% Documents will include: • Project Specifications • CAD based drawings showing the above mentioned aspects • Calculations/Supporting Design Data

Architectural Design Narrative Life Safety Code Analysis Mechanical Design Narrative Design References including codes, design guides and publications Cooling and Heating Load Calculations Electrical Design Narrative Illumination calculations / Photometrics Product Information / Equipment Manufacturers’ data


• Itemized Cost Estimate • Finish boards

Government Review: 1 Week PHASE 500 – FINAL DESIGN Task 501 – Present 95% Review Documents:Comments from 65% submittal will be incorporated and engineering drawings will be coordinated with architectural. All comments will be responded to in narrative form.

3-4 Weeks

GHFAA will submit the 95% Review Documents. The Drawing Components of the 95% Review Documents will include:

• Architectural Plans, Sections, Elevations and Schedules • Fire Alarm • Plumbing • HVAC • Lighting (building interior) • Power and Data

The 95% Documents will include: • Project Specifications • CAD based drawings showing the above mentioned aspects • Calculations/Supporting Design Data not already submitted under 65% Documents • Itemized Cost Estimate • Finish boards

Government Review: 1 Week

Task 502 – Specifications:

1 Week

GHFAA will develop specifications to define type and quality of materials, products, and workmanship. Task 507 – Architectural / Engineering:

2-3 Weeks

GHFAA will refine the Preliminary Design to address DTMB's review comments and to bring forth sufficient detail for complete Construction Documents. All comments will be responded to in narrative form. Task 508 – Drafting:CAD based drawings will be prepared.

Concurrent

Task 509 – Project Cost:The budget construction cost estimate will be developed.

Concurrent

Task 515 – Final Design Bidding Document ReviewGHFAA will submit the Final Design 100%, which will include:

: 1 Day

• Architectural Plans, Sections, Elevations and Schedules • Fire Alarm • Plumbing • HVAC • Lighting (building interior) • Power and Data • Security


Components of the Submittal: • Project Specifications • CAD based drawings showing the above mentioned aspects • Final Calculations/Supporting Design Data • Itemized Cost Estimate

Task 516 – Construction Bidding and Contracting ProceduresGHFAA will assist the State in the construction bidding and contracting process for construction. GHFAA will conduct a Pre-Bid meeting for each phase and issue any necessary addenda. GHFAA will review and evaluate construction bids. GHFAA will recommend bidder for Construction Contract Award.

: 1 Week

PHASE 600 – CONSTRUCTION SERVICE OFFICE Task 601 – Coordination:GHFAA will facilitate project coordination throughout the construction.

Concurrent

Task 602 – Shop Drawing/Submittals/Requests for Information:GHFAA will review shop drawings for accuracy and adherence to the design documents. GHFAA will respond to Requests for Information (RFI) in a timely manner.

Duration of Construction

Task 603 – Payment Procedures:GHFAA anticipates reviewing monthly payment requests. The review will be coordinated with construction inspections and evaluate percentage of work completed to percentage of work billed.


Task 604 –Construction Schedule Progress:GHFAA will review construction progress and report on any delays to schedule. GHFAA will review and negotiate the Contractor’s quotations for Bulletin Work. GHFAA will provide written recommendations to the State in a timely manner.


Task 607 –Punch List Procedures:GHFAA will create a Punchlist that details errors and omissions to be corrected for each construction contract. Errors and omissions will reference the corresponding specifications section or relevant construction drawing.

1 Week

Task 609 –As-Built Documents:GHFAA will provide final as-built documents to reflect the final renovation.

2-4 Weeks

Task 610 –Close-Out Procedures:GHFAA will review Contractor’s As-Built drawings, O&M manuals and warranties.

2-4 Weeks

PHASE 700 – CONSTRUCTION SERVICE FIELD Task 701 – Coordination:GHFAA will facilitate project coordination throughout the construction.

Concurrent

Task 702 – Pre-Construction Meeting:GHFAA will attend the Pre-Construction Meeting where they will present the project scope and address any questions.

1 Day

Task 703 – Construction Inspections:GHFAA will conduct weekly inspections during the construction. GHFAA will note the work completed, upcoming work, field questions and project schedule in a published report.

Weekly for the Duration of Construction

Task 705 – Construction Progress Meeting: Bi-Weekly for the Duration of Construction


GHFAA will attend bi-weekly progress meetings. GHFAA will facilitate the meeting, take notes and publish reports within three days of the meetings. Task 706 – Final Project Inspection: PunchlistGHFAA will conduct a final walk-through to produce a Punchlist in item 607 above. GHFAA will revisit the project to inspect the completion of the punchlist items.

2 Weeks

I-3B. Constructability Review and Quality Control Plan GHFAA has continued to improve methods for project management over the past forty-four years. The Office has developed templates for meeting reports and field reports which can be found in Appendix D of this proposal. GHFAA values consistent and accurate documentation of design decisions, field conditions and construction progress. Our office consists of an open studio format instead of individual offices. We find this promotes collaboration, mentoring and quality control. The President and Project Managers are intermixed with CAD Technicians making them accessible for questions and support. All documents are reviewed by senior staff prior to publication. Regular updates are held for coordination, problem solving and proactive management. In our office, the lead architect and project managers carefully review the documents before they leave our office. They also review shop drawings for conformance to design; this process is not left to young interns as in many offices. Shop drawings are not just taken at face value but are carefully reviewed for coordination with other components. We also utilize a number of checklists to ensure that all relevant information is included on the documents and examined during the design. Earlier we described checklists that we use during the initial field survey and we have attached an example of a mechanical checklist to this proposal. We also utilize a Michigan Building Code 2009 construction documents checklist which describes the minimum submittal requirements as defined by the code. Finally, we have a number of internal instructions for personnel to follow such as very specific printing standards with a sequence of proper steps.

I – 4 Questionnaire

Please refer to Appendix A for the completed Professional Questionnaire.

APPENDIX A Professional Questionnaire

Questionnaire for Professional Services

Department of Technology, Management and Budget 2013 Indefinite-Scope Indefinite-Delivery – Request for Qualifications

Architecture, Engineering, and Landscape Architecture Services Various Locations, Michigan

INSTRUCTIONS: Firms shall complete the following information in the form provided. A separate sheet may be used if additional space is needed; please key the continuation paragraphs to the questionnaire. Answer questions completely and concisely to streamline the review process. ARTICLE 1: BUSINESS ORGANIZATION 1. Full Name: G.H. Forbes Associates Architect, P.C.

Address: 225 South Main Street, Suite 200, Royal Oak, MI 48067 Telephone and Fax: T: (248)542-7866, F: (248)542-7909 Website: _www.ghfaa.com_____________________________ E-Mail: [email protected]________ Professional(s) federal I.D. number(s): 381985798 If applicable, state the branch office(s), partnering organization or other subordinate element(s) that will perform, or assist in performing, the work: NA

2. Check the appropriate status:

Individual firm Association Partnership Corporation, or Combination – Explain:

If you operate as a corporation, include the state in which you are incorporated and the date of incorporation: Michigan, 8/24/1972

Include a brief history of the Professional’s firm: GHFAA has been providing professional architectural services for over forty years. We provide innovative solutions for private clients as well as government clients. The firm began with innovative designs for branch banking and projects with the State of Michigan Department of Mental Health, State Police and Department of Corrections and Department of Social Services. Later, in 1995, the General Services Administration awarded GHFAA a contract that has led to unprecedented renewals and extensions due to attention to customer’s needs and prompt, accurate response. Recently, in 2009 GHFAA worked with the DTMB and DMVA to renovate the Lansing Reserve Forces. Currently, GHFAA is working with DTMB and DMVA to renovate the Detroit Light Guard Armory and the Washtenaw Armory.

Provide an organization chart depicting all personnel and their roles/responsibilities.

Provide an organization chart depicting key personnel and their roles for a typical assigned project. Include generic supporting staff positions.

REFER TO FIGURE 1 – GHFAA Organization Chart on Page 5.

ARTICLE 2: PROJECT TYPES AND SERVICES OFFERED Identify the project types and professional services for which your firm is exceptionally qualified and experienced. Provide attachments illustrating a minimum of three examples, with references, of successful projects performed in the last five years for each item checked. Identification of specialties will not exclude selected firms from project types, but will assist the DCD Project Directors in matching firms with projects.

ADA facility assessment and remodeling Boilers and steam systems Bridges – pedestrian and vehicular Building and structure additions Building envelope investigation, repair, upgrade Correctional facilities Door and window replacement Fire and security alarm systems Fish passage structures General architectural and/or engineering design HVAC equipment replacement, upgrade, selection HVAC controls replacement, upgrade, selection Interior remodeling and renovation Laboratory facilities Landscape architecture Land Planning Locks and dams Maintenance and facility preservation Marine work - boat launch facilities, docks, harbors Parking and paving Roof repair, restoration and/or replacement design Site surveying Stormwater management and drainage plans Structural investigation and assessment Toilet and/or shower room remodeling or design Trail design and development Wastewater systems Water supply systems Water diking systems, water control structures

ARTICLE 3: PROJECT LOCATION Identify the regions where your firm can most efficiently provide services. Assignments may vary from the regions checked, depending on the specialties and services required.

Western Upper Peninsula (west of Marquette) Eastern Upper Peninsula (east of Marquette) Northern Lower Peninsula (north of Grayling)

Saginaw Bay area (east of 127, north of I-69 and M 57, south of Grayling) Western Lower Peninsula (west of 127, north of Muskegon, south of Grayling) Central Lower Peninsula (east of Battle Creek, west of Chelsea, south of M 46 and M 57) Southwestern Lower Peninsula (west of Battle Creek, south of Muskegon) Southeastern Lower Peninsula (east of Chelsea, south of I-69)

ARTICLE 4: CONTRACT UNDERSTANDING: The following items should be addressed on the assumption that your firm is awarded an Indefinite-Scope, Indefinite-Delivery contract. (See attached sample contract). 4.1 Is it understood that your firm is required to respond to small projects (less than $25,000) as well as large

projects? Yes No

4.2 Is it understood that there is no guarantee of any work under this contract?

Yes No 4.3 Is it understood that your firm will be required to execute the attached standard State of Michigan

contract language for professional services? Yes No

4.4 Is it clearly understood that professional liability insurance is required at the time of execution of the ISID

contract? (See Article 5 of the attached Sample Contract.) Yes No

4.5 Is it understood that your firm must comply with State of Michigan law as it applies to your services?

Yes No 4.6 It is understood that your firm must obtain a State of Michigan, Department of Civil Rights Certificate of

Awardability (see RFP for information regarding the Certificate of Awardability)? If your firm currently has a Certificate of Awardability, provide its expiration date. 7/11/15 Yes No

ARTICLE 5: CAPACITY AND QUALITY 5.1 Briefly describe your firm’s methods and procedures for quality control for your deliverables and services.

GHFAA has continued to improve methods of project management over the past forty years. The Office has developed templates for meeting reports and field reports, examples are included in Appendix D. GHFAA values consistent and accurate documentation of design decisions, field conditions and construction progress. Our office consists of an open studio format instead of individual offices. We find this promotes collaboration, mentoring and quality control. Senior staff review all documents prior to publication and shop drawings for conformance to design and coordination with other components. Regular updates are held for coordination, problem solving and proactive management. We also utilize a number of checklists to ensure that all relevant information is included on the documents and examined during desing. Checklists are used during field survey as well as document production.

5.2 Has your firm been involved in claims or suits associated with professional services errors and/or

omissions? Yes No

If yes, explain:

5.3 Will there be a key person who is assigned to a project for its duration?

Yes No 5.4 Please present your understanding of the relationship between your firm, the DTMB Design and

Construction Division, and the State Agency for whom a project will be completed. GHFAA will report to the project manager at the DTMB. The State Agency for whom a project will be completed is the client. Our contract is with the DTMB. We will meet and coordinate with the State Agency as directed by the DTMB.

5.5 Describe your approach if a bidder proposes a substitution of a specified material during bidding.

Information will be requested of the bidder and the substitution will be reviewed for an equal level of performance, cost, quality, durability, maintanence, aesthetics, availability, origin and warranty to the specified material. If the substitution is found to be equal, GHFAA would recommend that the DTMB accept the substitution via addendum.

5.6 Describe your approach if a constractor proposes a substitution of a specified material or detail with shop

drawing submittals or in construction. GHFAA would require the General Contractor to submit an explanation in writing and assuming it has merit, evaluate the proposed for an equal level of performance, cost, quality, durability, maintenance, aesthetics, availability, origin and warranty to be specified. The substitution will also be reviewed for coordination with other components. If the proposed material or detail is found to be equal, GHFAA would approve the substitution with DTMB’s acceptance, noting any coordination items necessary.

5.7 How will your firm provide consistent and continuous communication pertaining to project activities and

project status to the State of Michigan during the progress of projects? GHFAA will issue meeting minutes within three business days of meetings and teleconferences. With each submittal of construction documents, GHFAA will issue written responses to review comments as well as questions to successfully complete the next design phase. During construction, GHFAA will typically visit the construction site weekly and provide a written field report with photographs. As a policy, we do not have voice mail within the office; if you call the office, you’ll get a live voice on the other end of the line. We feel this is important because while every project has a consistent key person, more than one person is assigned to the project so questions or concerns can be answered immediately. We also provide cell phone numbers to the Project Manager’s and General Contractor so that contance can be made at any time including weekends and after hours. Our project management staff is armed with smart phones and laptops so they’re never out of touch even when they are away from the office.

5.8 Does your company have an FTP or similar site for quick posting and distribution of information, drawings,

field inspection reports, and other communications? Yes No

5.9 Describe your method of estimating construction costs and demonstrate the validity of that method.

First, GHFAA calls manufacturers for current pricing. Second, we use real bid figures from past projects and experience in cost estimating. We take into account the market conditions and bid method. We use an Excel workbook that calculates material and labor cost per quantity and each item is categorized by the CSI specification system. We also maintain a current edition of the R.S.Means construction cost

estimating book although we tend to use it as more of a cross reference than a relaiable estimating tool. GHFAA routinely produces detailed cost estimates for bother private and public sector work. We have received positive feedback from GSA that our construction cost estimates are often within 5% accuracy. Recently our estimate for DTMB and DMVA Detroit Light Guard Phase 3 was within 4% of the award.

5.10 Describe your approach to minimizing construction cost over-runs.

GHFAA will provide budgetary construction costs durign the schematic design phase and continue to update cost estimates throughout the design to identify budget over-runs as early as possible. If a project is at risk for being over budget, GHFAA will notify the State immediately and advise and work with the State to identify how best to bring the project back to budget and still achieve the goals. Some strategies that may be considered include value engineering, descoping and deductive alternates. Our thorough field work as described under item I-1B of the Technical proposal helps to reduce over-run costs and can at the very least help to identify unknown factors leading into construction.

5.11 What percentage of construction cost should be devoted to construction administration (office and field)?

Construction Administration should constitute approximately 3% of the construction cost. Of the A/E fees, the amount for Construction Administration would be 20-25%.

5.12 What portion of the assigned work will be performed with your staff and what portion will be provided by

sub-consultants? GHFAA 70%+/-, Sub-consultants-30%+/-

5.13 On a typical project, what would be your response time, from the time receive a project assignment to

starting investigation and design work? A typical project might be one involving several disciplines and in the neighborhood of a $25,000 fee.) 2 to 3 business Days

5.14 How do you assess whether a construction bidder is responsive and responsible?

GHFAA will review the bid package for completeness, call references and inquire about past performances. GHFAA will interview the bidder and review any evaluations available. GHFAA will review the State’s Non-Compliance Reports, the Federal System for Award Management exclusion list, MIOSHA violations, and outstanding Prevailing Wage violations. In addition, GHFAA will compare the Contractor’s bid breakdown with our cost estimate for components that seem disproportionately low or high. We will discuss our findings and recommendations with the State.

5.15 Describe your firm’s understanding of Sustainable Design and LEED Certification.

Sustainable Design is a broad term that means to design in such a way as to conserve energy and resources and to produce healthier more productive environments in which we live and work. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Certification is a rating system of the U.S. Green Building Council that incorporates a point system to determine the environmental impact of a project. There are multiple rating systems depending upon the project type. For example, a small renovation project may use the Commercial Interiors rating system rather than the New Construction rating system. Each system requires compliance with prerequisites and awards points in five major categories as well as innovation in design. A minimum number of points is required for the project to be certified with more points earning silver, gold and finally the highest platinum rating. Many organizations are choosing to document sustainable effort by using the LEED checklists without incurring the cost of certification. GHFAA employs LEED accredited professionals and routinely incorporates sustainable strategies into our designs.

5.16 Describe your experience with similar open-ended contracts. GHFAA has enjoyed multiple Indefinite Services Contract with the General Services Administration with the Federal Government. Our responsiveness and performance has resulted in an unprecedented number of contract renewals. We are currently the only firm that is being renewed with the GSA for this region, other firms are new to the contract. Several project managers have told us that they recommended us for a contract renewal because we are thorough, responsive and provide a high quality service. We are accustomed to varying numbers of projects and workload. We are confident we can provide the same superior service to the State of Michigan.

5.17 Describe your methodology for obtaining information about the existence and condition of an existing,

facility’s components and systems. GHFAA and our Engineers are active early in the design process to perform thorough field investigations. We also interview the facilities manager and long time building occupants to learn about existing conditions and any issues. We are accustomed to poring through old drawings and seeking out relevant information. GHFAA will document any issues and bring these to the DTMB for consideration. GHFAA has developed checklists to guide field investigations as well as the production of documents.

5.18 Describe your approach to securing permits/approvals for the following: campgrounds, critical dunes,

coastal zone management, projects adjacent to Michigan lakes and rivers. The DEQ, Water Resource Division (WRD) regulates activities in designated areas. In general, our approach to securing permits/approvals for campgrounds, critical dunes, coastal zone management and projects adjacent to Michigan lakes and rivers is to determine if critical areas are present and what types of permits are required. We would develop a plan that eliminates or reduces the disturbance to critical areas as much as possible. After the critical area determination is made, a conceptual project plan with possible alternatives is developed. Then, a pre-application meeting with the MDEQ’s Land and Water Management Division (WMD) staff and other permitting agencies will be scheduled. During the pre-application meeting a plan will be agreed upon. Plans and permit applications will then be finalized and submitted to the appropriate agencies for final review and approval. Additionally, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) also regulates activities at the Federal Level. To simplify the permit process a DEQ/USACE – Joint Permit Application with the DEQ and USACE can be used for a variety of regulated activities.

5.19 Describe your approach to a construction contractor’s request for additional compensation for a change in

the project scope. GHFAA will review the issue to determine if they agree that there was a change in the project scope. GHFAA will discuss this with DTMB and if it is agreed by all parties that there is a change in project scope, GHFAA will work with DTMB to write a Bulletin documenting the change. GHFAA will perform an independent estimate of cost for the work and compare this to the Contractor’s pricing. GHFAA will negotiate the cost to obtain a fair and reasonable amount. GHFAA will make a recommendation to the DTMB to accept the pricing once it is determined to be fair and reasonable. If a reasonable price cannot be obtained or the funding is not available, GHFAA will work with the project team to develop alternatives to achieving the project goals without incurring additional costs.

APPENDIX B

Key Personnel Resumes

SCOTT W. GOODSELL, ARCHITECT G.H. Forbes Associates Architects, P.C. ___________________________________________________________________________

.

•

New Parks/Forestry Conversion - Detroit Material Testing Lab Facility Condition Analysis - Sterling Heights

layout of a system, preparation

Mr. Goodsell has more than 17 years of combined professional

experience as an architect working in Michigan and Ohio. He is the

President of GHFAA and as such is the firm’s primary point of contact.

Mr. Goodsell is responsible for project planning, program &

design, coordination of consulting disciplines, field observation,

management of contract document production, in-house

task distribution and quality control. He has been involved in more than 80 remodeling projects

for the General Services Administration and other

government entities and his responsibilities have included management of professional

activities, on-site investigations, technical evaluations of existing

buildings systems, supervision of working drawings & specifications, and coordination & monitoring the

construction administration activities. He has also overseen the

construction of several new stand alone buildings including site

improvements and has partnered for design/build projects.

• State of Michigan, Lansing, MI Reserve Forces Service Center Building Alterations - Lansing Washtenaw Armory Renovations - Ypsilanti Light Guard Armory Renovations - Detroit

• General Services Administration, Region 5 (Midwest)

Levin Fitness Center – Detroit USDC 5th Floor Renovation – Detroit New Passenger Elevators – Ann Arbor, Lansing Jury Room – Kalamazoo Fire Alarm Replacements – Ann Arbor, Flint, Kalamazoo, Lansing National Labor and Relations Board Office Renovation – Grand Rapids Parking Lot Improvements – Battle Creek Initial Space Build Out – Sault Sainte Marie TSA Office Renovation – Traverse City Judge’s Chambers – Flint, Lansing, Grand Rapids, Ann Arbor Courtroom Renovation – Grand Rapids General Services Administration Office Renovation – Grand Rapids Masonry Repairs – Battle Creek (5 Phases over 13 years) Switchgear Replacement – Ann Arbor, Lansing Chiller Replacement – Grand Rapids

• Veterans Administration, MI

Medical Clinic, Library and Media Center – Detroit Auditorium Renovation – Saginaw

• United States Coast Guard, MI & OH

Roof Replacement – Detroit, Cleveland

• Michigan Memorial Funeral Home, Flat Rock, MI Funeral Home Addition

• Michigan Memorial Park Cemetery, Flat Rock, MI Maintenance Facility Lighthouse Columbarium

PROJECT ROLE: Point Of Contact, Architect EDUCATION: University of Michigan – Bachelor of Science in Architecture, Master of Architecture PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: American Institute of Architects; AIA-Detroit Building Codes and Regulations Committee; Southeast Michigan Building Officials and Inspectors Association PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Architect – MI, OH

VISIT US @ www.ghfaa.com

Project Experience

THERESA SCHERWITZ, LEED AP, NCARB / ARCHITECT G. H. Forbes Associates Architects, P.C.

.

•

New Parks/Forestry Conversion - Detroit Material Testing Lab Facility Condition Analysis - Sterling Heights

layout of a system, preparation of specifications and shop drawing submittals, and field supervision of a project. Dave

Theresa Scherwitz has project management experience with all

aspects of the design and construction. Her

responsibilities include facilitating client meetings,

managing consultants and CAD technicians, project planning,

program and design, overseeing the production of Construction

Documents, cost estimating and managing construction. She has

served as the project manager and primary field inspector on

numerous projects for the General Services Administration

and the State of Michigan. She is the primary designer for LEED

related work.

• State of Michigan, Lansing, MI Reserve Forces Service Center – Lansing Michigan Washtenaw Armory Renovation – Ypsilanti Michigan Light Guard Armory Renovation – Detroit Michigan

• General Services Administration

DHS ERO/OPLA Renovation – Detroit Michigan USDC Workplace 20/20 – Bay City Michigan Jury Room – Kalamazoo Michigan USDC 5th Floor Renovation – Detroit Michigan USCOA Judge’s Chambers – Ann Arbor Michigan DHS Fitness Center – Detroit Michigan Levin Sidewalk replacement – Detroit Michigan Levin USDC Office Space Planning– Detroit Michigan 2nd Floor Tenant Office Space – Ann Arbor Michigan 3rd Floor Tenant Office Space– Ann Arbor Michigan

• Michigan Memorial Park

Lighthouse Columbarium– Flat Rock Michigan • United States Bankruptcy Court

Office Space Planning – Detroit Michigan

PROJECT ROLE: Lead Architect EDUCATION: Master of Architecture, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Bachelor of Science, Natural Resources & Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor PROFESSIONALREGISTRATIONS: Licensed Architect State of Michigan # 1301059775 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional National Council of Architectural Registration Boards Southeast Michigan Building Officials and Inspectors Association

VISIT US @ www.ghfaa.com

Project Experience

VISIT US @ www.peterbassoassociates.com

• City of Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI

New Police and Courts Building

• Macomb County, Clinton Township, MI

New 41-B District Court

• Detroit Wayne County Joint Building

Authority, Detroit, MI

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center Master Plan • Detroit Wayne County Joint Building

Authority, Detroit, MI

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center Electrical Site Analysis • Detroit Wayne County Port Authority

Detroit, MI

New Public Dock & Terminal Building

• City of Adrian, Adrian, MI

New Parks/Forestry Maintenance & Trans portation Facility

• City of Saline, Saline, MI

New DPW Facility

• Bedrock Real Estate Services, Detroit, MI

First National Building Infrastructure Upgrades and Various Tenant Improvements

• Washtenaw Community College

Ann Arbor, MI

Occupational Education Building Addition

• GM Renaissance Center, Detroit, MI

Renaissance Fitness Center

• YMCA of the Blue Water Area

Port Huron, MI

New YMCA with Fitness Area

• Grand Blanc Township, Grand Blanc, MI

New Police Station

• Oakland County International Airport

Waterford Township, MI

New Terminal & Airport Offi ces

Scott A. Garrison / PrincipalYour Partner in Engineering the Right Building Environment

PROJECT ROLE: Principal-in-ChargeEDUCATION: Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology, Wayne State UniversityPROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America; American Solar Energy Society, National fi re Protection Association; 7x24 Exchange of Southeast MichiganHONORS: Member of Tau Alpha Pi National Honor Society

Scott Garrison is a Principal with Peter Basso Associates.

He will lead the project team to ensure the client’s project

goals are met and the client’s expectations are exceeded. He

works closely with the project team throughout each phase

of a project and actively participates in the technical production of the electrical

and communication systems. Scott’s project responsibilities

range from setting initial design criteria, to

producing technical drawings and specifi cations

and overseeing construction activities.

Scott’s engineering and project experience is

diverse. Scott has worked on systems ranging from

large campus medium voltage distribution systems

and telecommunications structured cabling to photovoltaic electric

generation.

Project Experience


• State of Michigan, Lansing, MI

Hall of Justice Data Center Cooling Addition - Lansing

Center for Forensic Psychiatry Maintenance Projects - Saline

Washtenaw Armory Renovations - Ypsilanti

Detroit Detention Center Mound Correctional Facility Conversion - Detroit

Material Testing Lab Facility Condition Analysis - Sterling Heights

• City of Warren, Warren, MI

New City Hall and Library

• City of Warren, Warren, MI

Park Pavilion

• 16th District Court, Livonia, MI

New Courthouse Building

• City of Adrian, Adrian, MI

New Parks/Forestry Maintenance &

Transportation Facility


New DPW Facility


New Washtenaw County 14th District Courthouse

• Grand Blanc Township, Grand Blanc, MI

New Police Station

• Washtenaw County, Ann Arbor, MI

Meri Lou Murray Recreation Center Renovation

David A. Conrad, PE / Senior AssociateYour Partner in Engineering the Right Building Environment

PROJECT ROLE: Lead Mechanical Engineer

EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science in Architectural Engineering,

Kansas State University

PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and

Air Conditioning Engineers; Engineering Society of Detroit

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer - MI

David Conrad is a Senior

Associate with Peter Basso

Associates. His responsibilities

include mechanical design

of HVAC piping and control

systems for a variety of project

types. He participates in all

phases of a project, from

establishing design criteria

and verifying existing ! eld

conditions, to performing

heating and cooling load

calculations, design and layout

of a system, preparation

of speci! cations and shop

drawing submittals, and ! eld

supervision of a project.

Dave has experience in

building heating and cooling

load analyses, ductwork

layout and sizing, HVAC piping

layout and sizing, piping

hydraulic analyses, and ! eld

investigation. His project

experience includes new

construction and renovation

of various types of facilities,

and he is skilled in the use of

a variety of computer-analysis

and CAD software packages.

Project Experience


• State of Michigan, Lansing, MI

Center for Forensic Psychiatry Maintenance Projects - Saline

Hall of Justice Data Center Cooling Addition - Lansing

Washtenaw Armory Renovations - Ypsilanti

Huron Valley Women’s Correctional Facility IP Security Station - Ypsilanti

Ryan Correctional Facility Dialysis Machine Relocation - Detroit

Genesee Valley Regulation Center Mechanical/Electrical Study - Flint

• Detroit Wayne County Joint Building Authority, Detroit, MI

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center Master Plan

• Detroit Wayne County Joint Building Authority, Detroit, MI

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center Electrical Site Analysis

• City of Charlevoix, Charlevoix, MI

East Park Site Improvements

• City of Southgate, Southgate, MI

New Southgate Community Center

• City of Northville, Northville, MI

Town Square Improvements

• United States Postal Service, MI

Multiple Locations - New O! ces and Renovations

• Macomb County, Mt. Clements, MI

New 41-B District Courthouse


New DPW Facility

Eric M. Graettinger, PE, LEED AP BD+C / Senior AssociateYour Partner in Engineering the Right Building Environment

PROJECT ROLE: Lead Electrical Engineer

EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering,

University of Detroit Mercy

ACCREDITATIONS: USGBC LEED Accredited Professional LEED AP BD+C

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer - MI, AZ, NE, NV

PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: Illuminating Engineering Society of North

America - President of Detroit Section

Eric Graettinger is a Senior

Associate with over 15

years’ electrical engineering

experience. Eric is responsible

for the technical production

of a project, including system

design and layout, product

research, documentation and

drawing review submittals,

and " eld investigations. He

also monitors the budget

and schedule throughout the

course of a project.

Eric’s project experience

includes both new

construction and renovation

of retail, commercial,

institutional, government,

corporate and prototype

facilities. He has been

involved in the design of

specialty indoor and outdoor

lighting systems; medium-

and low-voltage power

distribution systems; " re

alarm systems; emergency

power distribution systems;

power system evaluations;

studies for existing primary

and secondary distribution

systems; and facility condition

studies.

Project Experience

APPENDIX C

Project Examples

PROJECT TYPES AND SERVICES OFFERED:

Below is an index of the example projects by type. We have added an Environmental category since we have found that renovation projects often include the proper handling of hazardous materials including asbestos abatement and lead mitigation.

ADA facility assessment and remodeling

ERO/OPLA Expansion……………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 3 Levin Fitness Center……………………………….……………………………………….……… Page 5 USDC 5th Floor Renovation……………………………….……………………………………… Page 8 Detroit Light Guard Armory Renovation……………………………….………………………….……Page 4 Washtenaw Armory Renovation……………………………….………………………….…… Page 6 New Passenger Elevator…………………………………….……………………………………. Page 12 Reserve Forces Service Center – Building Alterations………………………………………… Page 25 USDC Office Space 20/20………………………………………………………………….…… Page 23 Kalamazoo Jury Room……………………………….……………………………………….……… Page 24

Building and structure additions

New Passenger Elevator …………………………………….……………………………………. Page 12 Funeral Home Addition …………………………………….……………………………………… Page 13 Lighthouse Columbarium…………………………………….……………………………………. Page 14

Building envelope investigation, repair, upgrade

Masonry Repairs and Roof Replacement……………………………………………………… Page 9 Detroit Coast Guard …………………………………….……………………………………… Page 15 Reserve Forces Service Center – Building Alterations………………………………………… Page 25 Washtenaw Armory Renovations………………………………………………………………… Page 6

Fire and security alarm systems

Kalamazoo Fire Alarm……………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 2 ERO/OPLA Expansion…………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 3 Lansing Fire Alarm……………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 20 Flint Fire Alarm…………………………….………………………………………………….…… Page 22 Detroit Light Guard Armory Renovation……………………………….………………………….……Page 4 Washtenaw Armory Renovation………………………………………………………………… Page 6

General Architectural and / or Engineering Design

National Labor and Relations Board Office Renovation……………………………….………… Page 1 ERO/OPLA Expansion……………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 3 Levin Fitness Center……………………………….……………………………………….……… Page 5 Sault St. Marie Office Space……………………………………………………………..………… Page 7 USDC 5th Floor Renovation……………………………….……………………………………… Page 8 USCA Judge’s Chambers …………………………………………………………………………. Page 10 New Passenger Elevator …………………………………….……………………………………. Page 12

Reserve Forces Service Center – Building Alterations………………………………………… Page 25 USDC Office Space 20/20………………………………………………………………….…… Page 23 Kalamazoo Jury Room……………………………….……………………………………….……… Page 24

HVAC equipment replacement, upgrade, selection

ERO/OPLA Expansion……………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 3 Levin Fitness Center……………………………….……………………………………….……… Page 5 USCA Judge’s Chambers …………………………………………………………………………. Page 10 Reserve Forces Service Center – Building Alterations………………………………………… Page 25 Detroit Light Guard Armory Renovation……………………………….………………………….……Page 4 Washtenaw Armory Renovation………………………………………………………………… Page 6 Kalamazoo Jury Room……………………………….……………………………………….……… Page 24

HVAC controls replacement, upgrade, selection

ERO/OPLA Expansion……………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 3 Detroit Light Guard Armory Renovation……………………………….………………………….……Page 4 Washtenaw Armory Renovation………………………………………………………………… Page 6 USCA Judge’s Chambers …………………………………………………………………………. Page 10 Levin BAS …………………………………………………….……………………………………. Page 11 Reserve Forces Service Center – Building Alterations………………………………………… Page 25

Interior remodeling and renovation

National Labor and Relations Board Office Renovation……………………………….………… Page 1 ERO/OPLA Expansion……………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 3 Washtenaw Armory Renovation………………………………………………………………… Page 6 Detroit Light Guard Armory Renovation……………………………….………………………….……Page 4 Levin Fitness Center……………………………….……………………………………….……… Page 5 Sault St. Marie Office Space……………………………………………………………..………… Page 7 USDC 5th Floor Renovation……………………………….……………………………………… Page 8 USCA Judge’s Chambers …………………………………………………………………………. Page 10 Levin BAS …………………………………………………….……………………………………. Page 11 New Passenger Elevator …………………………………….……………………………………. Page 12 Funeral Home Addition …………………………………….……………………………………… Page 13 Reserve Forces Service Center – Building Alterations………………………………………… Page 25 USDC Office Space 20/20………………………………………………………………….…… Page 23 Kalamazoo Jury Room……………………………….……………………………………….……… Page 24

Maintenance and facility preservation

Kalamazoo Fire Alarm……………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 2 ERO/OPLA Expansion……………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 3 USDC 5th Floor Renovation……………………………….……………………………………… Page 8 Masonry Repairs and Roof Replacement……………………………………………………… Page 9 Levin BAS …………………………………………………….……………………………………. Page 11 Lansing Fire Alarm……………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 20 USDC Office Space 20/20………………………………………………………………….…… Page 23 Kalamazoo Jury Room……………………………….……………………………………….……… Page 24

Parking and Paving

Washtenaw Armory Parking Lot Improvements……………………………………………………… Page 6 Parking Lot Addition…………………………………….……………………………………… Page 16 Manchester Gate…………………………………….………………………………………… Page 17 Ann Arbor Secure Parking Lot…………………………………….…………………………… Page 18

Roof repair, restoration and or replacement design

Washtenaw Armory Renovation………………………………………………………………….. Page 6 Masonry Repairs and Roof Replacement……………………………………………………… Page 9 Funeral Home Addition …………………………………….……………………………………… Page 13 Detroit Coast Guard…………………………………….……………………………………… Page 15 Cleveland Coast Guard…………………………………….……………………………………… Page 19

Toilet and / or shower room remodeling or design

ERO/OPLA Expansion……………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 3 Detroit Light Guard Armory Renovation……………………………….………………………… Page 4 Washtenaw Armory Renovation…………….……………………………………….…… Page 6 Levin Fitness Center……………………………….……………………………………….……… Page 5 Reserve Forces Service Center – Building Alterations………………………………………… Page 25 USDC Office Space 20/20………………………………………………………………….…… Page 23

Environmental – asbestos abatement/lead mitigation/hazardous materials

National Labor and Relations Board Office Renovation……………………………….………… Page 1 ERO/OPLA Expansion……………………………….……………………………………….…… Page 3 Detroit Light Guard Armory Renovations………………………………………………………… Page 4 Levin Fitness Center……………………………….……………………………………….……… Page 5 Masonry Repairs and Roof Replacement……………………………………………………… Page 9 Reserve Forces Service Center – Building Alterations………………………………………… Page 25 USDC Office Space 20/20………………………………………………………………….…… Page 23 Kalamazoo Jury Room……………………………….……………………………………….……… Page 24

EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT

EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER

1

TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD OFFICE RENOVATION Grand Rapids, Michigan

YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

2008 CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable)

2009

PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION

PROJECT OWNER General Services Administration

POINT OF CONTACT NAME Seth LaRoque

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER (313) 317-9622

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Appendix C -Page 1

The renovation of a portion of the second floor of the Gerald R. Ford U.S. Courthouse & Federal Building to accommodate new offices for the National Labor Relations Board. The remediation work includes the removal of asbestos fireproofing and vinyl asbestos floor tile. The project includes the construction of ten private offices and a hearing room with support spaces such as a kitchenette, reception area and a conference room.

PROJECT TYPES General Architectural and Engineering Design Interior remodeling and renovation Environmental - asbestos abatement / lead mitigation

Cost of Construction: $360,000 Size: 4,600 sq.ft.

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey and construction documents with NTH Consultants and EAM Engineers for the renovation of a vacant area of the second floor of the Ford Federal Building. The work included identifying and designing the processes of the safe, legal abatement of asbestos fireproofing and vinyl asbestos floor tile. Work included demolition; hazardous material remediation; partitions; plastic laminate cabinetry and hardwood desks; doors and hardware; fireproofing; painting; flooring; ceiling systems; receptacles; data outlets; lighting; fire alarm modifications; fire sprinkler modifications; plumbing; ductwork and HVAC controls. New construction materials with recycled content were used and demolished materials were diverted from landfills where possible. Duties for professional services include design/analysis, drawings, specifications, detailed cost estimates Construction Administration Services G.H.Forbes Associates with NTH Consultants and EAM Engineers provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code enforcement. Duties for professional services for the project included air monitoring, reporting and inspections for asbestos abatement, consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection



2


FIRE PROTECTION IMPROVEMENTS Kalamazoo Federal Building - Kalamazoo, Michigan



2009



POINT OF CONTACT NAME Irena Rogachevsky

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER (312)-353-0876


Appendix C -Page 2

The Kalamazoo Federal Building is a two-story, 80,000 sq.ft. office building and courthouse. The intent of the project was to provide a new addressable fire detection and alarm system, a new fire sprinkler system to protect the basement level, select ceiling & lighting replacement and a new emergency inverter battery system. The project also involved asbestos abatement. The work included identifying and designing the processes of the safe, legal removal of friable asbestos above the ceiling.

PROJECT TYPES Fire and security alarm systems Maintenance and facility preservation

Cost of Construction: $625,000

Design Services G.H. Forbes Associates provided field survey and construction documents with NTH Consultants, AON Fire Protection Engineering (formerly Schirmer Engineering) and EAM Engineers. G.H. Forbes worked with the GSA Historic Preservation Branch to review the installation of new, visible fire alarm devices and determine the best locations to minimize their impact on the historic nature of the building yet provide the proper level of safety for the occupants. Duties for professional services include design/analysis, drawings, specifications, detailed cost estimates Construction Administration Services G.H.Forbes Associates with NTH Consultants, AON Fire Protection Engineering and EAM Engineers provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code enforcement. Duties for professional services for the project included air monitoring, reporting and inspections for asbestos abatement, consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection.



3


ERO OPLA Expansion Rosa Parks Federal Building - Detroit, Michigan


2010 - 2011 CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable) 2012

PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION PROJECT OWNER

General Services Administration

POINT OF CONTACT NAME William Green

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER

(312)353-0694 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Appendix C -Page 3

This project included the expansion and construction of office space and detention facilities throughout the Rosa Parks Federal Building. The building consists of two main components: the Historic Building and the Annex Building. The Historic Building has 3 stories, an attic and a basement. The Annex Building has 2 stories and a basement.

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey, design and construction documents for the renovation of the Annex Building and Historic Building of the Rosa Parks Federal Building. New work included steel stud and gypsum board acoustically rated walls; plastic laminate cabinetry; doors and hardware; painting; carpet; anti-static floor tile; ceiling systems; providing a complete turn-key security system; receptacles; data outlets; lighting; fire alarm modifications; fire sprinkler modifications; plumbing; replacing the air handler unit in both buildings, ductwork and HVAC controls. The renovation includes 2 phases. Phase 1 work included the complete renovation of the first and second floors of the Annex Building and the replacement of the air handler unit in the basement of the Annex. Phase 2 work included the complete renovation of the basement, first, second and third floors of the Historic Building and the replacement of the air handler unit in the attic. A stair tower for a fire escape was also added. Careful coordination of design with the GSA Historic Preservation Branch was required for the corridors of the Historic Building.

Construction Administration Services G..H. Forbes Associates provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code Enforcement Duties for professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection.

PROJECT RELEVANCE Renovation of existing facilities. Historic Preservation. Team experience. Project included design/analysis, drawings, specifications, detailed cost estimates and construction monitoring and inspections.

Cost of Construction: $5,556,500 Size: 49,000 sq.ft.



4


Armory Modifications Dept. of Military and Veterans Affairs -Detroit, Michigan

YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2013-2014

CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable) 2013-2014


PROJECT OWNER

Department of Military & Veterans Affairs

POINT OF CONTACT NAME Brian Bushnell



Appendix C -Page 4

The existing building was constructed in 1956 and serves as a training facility with food preparation, equipment storage, light maintenance and administration. The facility requires a renovation to satisfy the current use and design guide standards including size of supply rooms, personal equipment storage and vaults. As is common with buildings of this age, there are hazardous materials including asbestos and lead. The building will continue to be occupied during the renovation. The project encompassed multiple phases with multiple Contractors to remodel the basement, first and second floor of the building, including restroom upgrades for ADA compliance, new poured and modular vaults, mechanical and electrical improvements, demolition and remediation of hazardous materials. The 62,000 square foot basement includes various storage areas, a vehicle area, lockers and mechanical space. The design incorporates the use of the original exhaust fans and much of the existing ductwork to serve the basement. Carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide detectors control the exhaust. Fire alarm devices will be added throughout the basement. Various types of concrete repair will be employed to restore the floor in the vehicle bays. An existing generator will be rebuilt and installed in an existing modified out-building. The first floor renovation includes a mail room, restroom renovations, offices, vaults and supply areas. The existing kitchen on the second floor will be converted to a secret internet protocol router (SIPR) room.

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey, life cycle cost analysis, construction documents including plans, specifications and cost estimating. Construction Administration Services G.H.Forbes Associates will provide field inspection for the project which is scheduled to begin May, 2013. Professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection.

Size: 70,000 sq.ft. Cost of Construction: Basement: $1,666,000 First and Second Floor: $1,000,000

PROJECT RELEVANCE Renovation of existing facilities. Experience with the State of Michigan. Experience with Army National Guard Design Guides and Security Standards. Project included secure vaults, ADA facility assessment and remodeling, HVAC Equipment replacement, upgrade, selection, HVAC controls replacement, upgrade, selection, replacement of electrical panels, new lighting, lighting controls, generator rehabilitation and fire alarm.



5


FITNESS CENTER Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse - Detroit, Michigan


2006-2007 CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable)

2008



POINT OF CONTACT NAME Marty Findeisen



Appendix C -Page 5

This project involved the removal of an incinerator containing hazardous materials and the renovation of a portion of the basement level of the historic Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse to accommodate a new fitness center, men's and women's locker rooms with showers and an HVAC system.

PROJECT TYPES ADA facility assessment and remodeling General Architectural and Engineering HVAC equipment replacement, upgrade, selection Interior remodeling and renovation Toilet and shower room remodeling Environmental-asbestos abatement / lead mitigation

Cost of Construction: $750,000 Size: 4,600 sq.ft

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey and construction documents with NTH Consultants and EAM Engineers. The work included identifying and designing the processes of the safe, legal removal of an existing incinerator contaminated with lead and lined with asbestos and the remediation of lead-based paint. New work included steel stud and gypsum board acoustically rated walls to deck; specialty finishes related to fitness facilities; doors and hardware; specialty acoustical treatments; showers; lockers; benches; counters; sinks; toilets; toilet partitions; toilet room accessories; receptacles; data outlets; lighting; fire alarm modifications; fire sprinkler modifications; an independent HVAC system; ductwork and HVAC controls. The work also included the renovation of the historic basement corridors that are commonly used by the Judge's utilizing the underground parking garage. Construction Administration Services G.H.Forbes Associates with NTH Consultants and EAM Engineers provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code enforcement. Duties for professional services for the project included air monitoring, reporting and inspections for asbestos abatement, consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection.



6


Armory Modifications and Parking Lot Improvements Dept. of Military and Veterans Affairs -Ypsilanti, Michigan

YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2013-2014



PROJECT OWNER





Appendix C -Page 6

The existing building was constructed in 1991 and serves as a training facility with food preparation, equipment storage, light maintenance and administration. The facility requires a renovation to satisfy the current use and design guide standards including size of supply rooms, personal equipment storage and vaults. The building will continue to be occupied during the renovation. The project encompassed multiple phases with multiple Contractors to remodel the interior and exterior of the armory and the parking lot. The interior renovation includes restroom upgrades for ADA compliance, new vaults, offices, supply areas, conversion of a rifle range to personal equipment storage locker room, new HVAC, modifications to existing HVAC, new direct digital controls throughout the armory, lighting, occupancy sensors, power, data, fire alarm and fire suppression modifications. The exterior improvements include investigation and remediation of cracking brick corners, new expansion joints, remediation for improper flashing details in original design and replacement of the roof on the armory, garage and vehicle storage. The parking lot will be moved to achieve the design guide force protection standards. An existing underground diesel fuel tank will be removed and a new above ground diesel fuel tank will be installed. New fencing, gates and parking barriers will be installed. Hydrants will be replaced. New exterior dark lighting (sensors) will be used to save energy and achieve security.

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates is providing field survey, construction documents including plans, specifications and cost estimating. Construction Administration Services G.H.Forbes Associates will provide field inspection for the project which is scheduled to begin September, 2013. Professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection.

Size: 37,000 sq.ft. Cost of Construction: Armory: $1,200,000 Parking Improvements: $1,000,000

PROJECT RELEVANCE Renovation of existing facilities. Experience with the State of Michigan. Experience with Army National Guard Design Guides and Security Standards. Project included secure vaults, ADA facility assessment and remodeling, HVAC Equipment replacement, upgrade, selection, HVAC controls replacement, upgrade, selection, new lighting, lighting controls, and fire alarm and fire suppression modifications.



7


First Floor Office Buildout U.S. Land Port of Entry - Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan



2011



POINT OF CONTACT NAME Dana Pionke

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER (312)353-1490


Appendix C -Page 7

The renovation of an unoccupied portion of the first floor of the US Land Port of Entry border station. The project included the construction of new offices and training facilities, catwalks above and furniture layout design

PROJECT TYPES General Architectural and Engineering Design Interior remodeling and renovation

Cost of Construction: $675,000 Size: 3,085 sq.ft

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey, design and construction documents with EAM Engineers for the renovation of a vacant area of the US Land Port of Entry Border Station. New work included steel stud and gypsum board acoustically rated walls; plastic laminate cabinetry; doors and hardware; painting; carpet; anti-static floor tile; resilient tile; ceiling systems; receptacles; data outlets; lighting; fire alarm modifications; security system devices; fire sprinkler modifications; plumbing; ductwork and HVAC controls. Duties for professional services include design/analysis, drawings, specifications and detailed cost estimates. Construction Administration Services G.H. Forbes Associates with EAM Engineers provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code Enforcement. Duties for professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection



8


USDC 5th Floor Renovation Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse - Detroit, Michigan

YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2009

CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable) 2011


PROJECT OWNER


POINT OF CONTACT NAME Ransom Gillespie



Appendix C -Page 8

Design Services G.H. Forbes Associates provided design intent documents, field survey, design, construction documents and construction services assisted by EAM Engineers and NTH Consultants. The design work commenced with a broad study with preliminary planning, 3D renderings and the design of the furniture for the project, which included meeting with the U.S. Courts at the Merchandise Mart in Chicago. A separate bid package by G.H. Forbes was provided for all the systems furniture in the project. New work included steel stud and gypsum board acoustically rated walls; glass wall assemblies; plastic laminate cabinetry; hardwood panels; doors and hardware; painting; flooring; signage; ceiling systems; receptacles; data outlets; lighting; fire alarm modifications; fire sprinkler modifications; plumbing; ductwork; independent air conditioning units; and HVAC controls. New construction materials with recycled content were used and demolished materials were diverted from landfills where possible. G.H. Forbes worked with the GSA Historic Preservation Branch to determine the extent to which the doors in the historic corridor could be altered. This successful project has generated discussion as being a model for future projects with the U.S. Courts.


PROJECT RELEVANCE Renovation of existing facilities. Historic Preservation. Studies. Furniture. Construction of training facilities. Team experience. Experience with the Courts. Project included design/analysis, drawings, specifications, detailed cost estimates and construction monitoring and inspections.

Construction Administration Services G.H. Forbes Associates with EAM Engineers provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code Enforcement. Duties for professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection



9


Masonry Repairs and Roof Replacements Battle Creek, Michigan

YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2001, 2006 & 2010 *

CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable) 2004 & 2008 *


PROJECT OWNER


POINT OF CONTACT NAME Steven Yamasaki



Phase 3 - Building 1 Phase 3 - Structural Repairs Phase 4 - Building 2B Phase 5 - Building 5 (Construction Pending)

Appendix C -Page 9

* YEAR COMPLETED - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 2001- Phases 1&2; 2006 - Phase 3; 2006 - Phase 4; 2010 - Phase 5 * YEAR COMPLETED - CONSTRUCTION: 2004 - Phases 1&2; 2008 - Phase 3; 2008 - Phase 4 Design Services These projects were for the restoration of various buildings throughout the campus of the Dole Hart Inouye Federal Center. G.H. Forbes Associates along with Architecture + Design Inc., the firm's historic preservation consultant, has provided studies, field surveys and construction documents for exterior masonry and roof repairs for numerous historic buildings over the course of the past 10 years. The professional services have included two studies over the course of these projects to help prioritize repairs as well as establish budgets for the project. The repair work has included: tuckpointing of brick masonry; replacement of exterior insulating finish systems with new brick masonry; limestone restoration and repair; repair of concrete skim coating; repair of concrete structural support beams; and lead-based paint remediation. Roof replacements are included on Phases 3 and 5. Phases 1 through 4 are complete. Phase 5 design was completed in 2010. G.H. Forbes, under a separate work order, also completed the design for the replacement of the windows for Building 5 in 2010; construction for that project is pending. G.H. Forbes worked closely with the GSA Historic Preservation Branch especially on Building 5 to develop repairs and specify materials that satisfy the criteria set forth by the State of Michigan's Historic Preservation Office. Duties for professional services include study, design/analysis, drawings, specifications, detailed cost estimates.

Construction Administration Services G.H.Forbes Associates with NTH Consultants (environmental engineering) provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code enforcement. Duties for professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection.

PROJECT TYPES: Building envelope investigation, repair, upgrade Maintenance and facility preservation Roof repair, restoration and or replacement design Environmental - asbestos abatement/lead mitigation

Phases 1 & 2 Size: All of Building #2; Building #1 Portico Cost: $2,300,000 Phase 3 Size: All of Building #1 and Building #1A Cost: $1,400,000 Phase 4 Size: All of Buildings 2A, 2B and 2C Cost: $ 900,000 Phase 5 Size: All of Building 5, Courtyard, Cost: $1,400,000 Building 20 and Walkway

EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT


10


USCA Judge's Chambers Charles Chamberlain U.S.Courthouse & Federal Building - Lansing, Michigan



2007



. POINT OF CONTACT NAME William Green



Appendix C -Page 10

The renovation of a portion of the second floor of the Charles Chamberlain U.S. Courthouse & Federal Building to accommodate new chambers for U.S.Court of Appeals Judge and his staff. The project included: a private office and toilet room for the Judge, a library, a reception area, a work room/galley, storage and four clerk's offices. The design of the office was developed through meetings, sketches and renderings to meet the Judge's aesthetic preferences. All aspects of the chambers were meticulously designed, down to the finials on the door hinges.

PROJECT TYPES General Architectural and Engineering Design HVAC equipment replacement, upgrade, selection HVAC controls replacement, upgrade, selection Interior remodeling and renovation


Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey, design and construction documents with EAM Engineers for the renovation of a vacant area of the second floor of the Ford Federal Building. New work included steel stud and gypsum board acoustically rated walls; painted millwork including wainscot, chair rail, base, crown molding, door trims; painted wood bookshelves and display cases; plastic laminate cabinetry; doors and hardware; painting; carpet; ceiling systems; receptacles; data outlets; specialty lighting including real alabaster pendant fixtures; fire alarm modifications; plumbing; a new independent air handler unit; ductwork and HVAC controls.

Construction Administration Services G.H.Forbes Associates with EAM Engineers provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code enforcement. Duties for professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection. A millwork expert was also engaged to assist in reviewing shop drawings and inspecting the material fabrication.



11


Building Automation System Upgrades - ARRA Theodore Levin U.S.Courthouse - Detroit, Michigan



2011



POINT OF CONTACT NAME Benjamin Warren



Appendix C -Page 11

The primary intent of the project was to replace the front end Building Automation System (BAS), the associated primary controllers, and the secondary controllers. The existing BAS was outdated and Bacnet protocol installed with the new system. The replacement of the BAS will improve the energy efficiency of the building by allowing more precise control of the heating and cooling systems and allowing temperature setbacks to be implemented based on space occupancy. The new BAS also provides energy consumption and trending information to allow the staff to identify where energy is be used so conservation measures can be implemented. The installation of occupancy sensors in selected courtrooms was included to provide a daytime setback temperature in the range of 77ºF should be considered so that a temperature of 72ºF can be reached in a relatively short period of time once the occupancy sensor is activated. Several other aspects of the building were also reviewed and the A/E advised GSA of the potential benefits and costs. Some of the items that were reviewed but not implemented were controls for the hundreds of fan coil units that exist in the building because of cost and improvements to the lighting systems in the main lobby. Relative to the lighting, a more energy efficient lamp that could be used was identified but because of the emergence of new LED lamps the A/E recommended that the GSA postpone the new lamping to utilize this upcoming product.

PROJECT TYPES HVAC controls replacement, upgrade, selection Interior remodeling and renovation Maintenance and facility preservation

Cost of Construction: $850,000 Size: Entire Building / N/A

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey, design and construction documents with EAM Engineers for the implementation of the new BAS system. One of the first steps was to reconcile the project scope with the available budget. The documents were created such that options for work could be added to or removed from the scope with relative ease if the funding for the project changed or new issues arose during construction. Since the project was being bid as Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc), the A/E was cognizant of setting up the bidding documents to be flexible but thorough enough to receive fair pricing at the time of bid and as changes occurred after the award to the CMc. Because the project was funded by the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA), the A/E worked on a tight schedule to complete the documents and filed the necessary paperwork for ARRA reporting.

Construction Administration Services G.H.Forbes Associates with EAM Engineers worked with the selected general contractor and GSA to examine the scope and the proposed BAS. The A/E also provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code enforcement. Duties for professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection.



12


New Passenger Elevator Charles Chamberlain Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse - Lansing, Michigan



Pending



POINT OF CONTACT NAME Gregory Fudala



Appendix C -Page 12

The addition of an elevator in the Lansing Federal Building. The elevator is to reach the basement, first and second floors of the building. The project includes the construction of a new elevator shaft, an elevator machine room, and renovation to the new elevator lobby.

PROJECT TYPES: ADA facility assessment and remodeling Building and structure additions General Architectural and Engineering Design Interior remodeling and renovation

Cost of Construction: $900,000 Size: Not Applicable

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey, design and construction documents with EAM Engineers for the addition of a passenger elevator in the Lansing Federal Building. New work includes structural elements to accommodate new elevator shaft; steel stud and gypsum board acoustically rated walls; CMU walls, doors and hardware; painting; stone walls to match existing; ceiling systems; receptacles; data outlets; lighting; fire sprinkler modifications, fire alarm modifications; plumbing; a new sump pump; ductwork and HVAC controls. Duties for professional services include design/analysis, drawings, specifications and detailed cost estimates. Construction documents for the project are complete. Construction is pending.



13


Funeral Home Addition Michigan Memorial, Flat Rock Michigan



2013


PROJECT OWNER Daniel Dwyer

POINT OF CONTACT NAME Daniel Dwyer



Appendix C -Page 13

The addition of utility space to an existing funeral home to add a garage, storage, viewing area and a cremation room.

PROJECT TYPES: Building and structure additions Interior remodeling and renovation Roof design

Cost of Construction: $650,000 Size: 2,800 sq. ft.

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey, design and construction documents with EAM Engineers for the utility addition to a funeral home. New work includes structural elements to accommodate a single story addition; poured footings and foundation walls; concrete floors, steel beams and trusses; doors and hardware; painting; brick exterior to match existing; receptacles; lighting; fire sprinklers; plumbing; ductwork and HVAC controls. Duties for professional services include design/analysis, drawings, specifications, detailed cost estimates. Construction documents for the project are underway. Construction was completed in 2013. .



14


Lighthouse Columbarium Michigan Memorial, Flat Rock Michigan



2008


PROJECT OWNER Kelly Dwyer

POINT OF CONTACT NAME Kelly Dwyer



Appendix C -Page 14

Situated on the beautiful Huron River in southeast Michigan, the Michigan Memorial Park Lighthouse offers a unique final resting place in a natural setting. Designed and constructed in conjunction with Cold Spring Granite, the Lighthouse theme was an obvious choice based its proximity to the river and as an homage to the many lighthouses dotting the extensive coastline of Michigan. With 365 available niches, the Lighthouse and its cantilevered platform and its railing reminiscent of nautical deck offers unique views of the river and its lush banks. It's concealed far from any public road, creating a peaceful and serene environment. The Lighthouse is constructed above a 1930's pump room that feeds a pond at the gates of the cemetery and conceals a door that allows the cemetery to service the pump equipment. Should the cemetery decide to eliminate the function of the pump room in the future, the interior of the lighthouse can be converted into a private columbarium

PROJECT TYPES: Building and structure additions


Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey, design and construction documents for niche walls to store cremated remains and a new elevated deck to surround a columbarium. Construction Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field inspection for the project. Duties for the professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection. .


EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER 15


Roof Repair and Tuckpointing Coast Guard, Detroit Michigan

YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2006, 2008

CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable) 2006, 2008


PROJECT OWNER U.S. Coast Guard

POINT OF CONTACT NAME Lt Kent Hammack



Appendix C -Page 15

The Coast Guard Base is located on the waterfront in downtown Detroit. The brick clad structure with multiple roof levels suffered water leakage through masonry joints and windows. A roof replacement project and masonry tuckpointing project was executed as two Design-Build Projects with the general contractor as the lead. The roof is comprised of five areas and was replaced with a modified bitumen roof system. Brick masonry repairs included resealant, repointing, surface grouting, cleaning mortar blockage from weep holes, removal and replacement of improperly installed flashing.

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates with NTH Consultants provided an analysis of the existing roof conditions and created construction documents for a new roof system including associated flashing and other accessories. The detailing and specifications were tailored to the specific site conditions. G.H. Forbes Associates provided a report documenting the nature and extent of the brick masonry deterioration and recommendations for needed repairs. Construction Services G.H.Forbes Associates with NTH Consultants provided field inspection for the project. Duties for professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspections. Masonry Repair Cost of Construction: $100,000 Roof Replacement Cost of Construction: $530,000 Size: 21,500 sq. ft.

PROJECT TYPES: Building envelope investigation, repair, upgrade Roof repair, restoration and/or replacement design



16


Parking Lot Addition Griffin Funeral Home, Livonia Michigan




PROJECT OWNER LJ Griffin Funeral Home

POINT OF CONTACT NAME David Griffin



Appendix C -Page 16

The LJ Griffin Funeral Home purchased an adjacent property to expand and improve the existing exterior facilities. The existing parking lot was improved with re-striping, lighting and landscaping. The new parking lot was designed to accommodate a hearse and limousine turning radius. The new layout maximized efficiency while incorporating landscaping and lighting and required setbacks.

Design Services G.H. Forbes Associates provided field survey, schematic and construction documents for the parking lot addition and improvements. New work included new asphalt pavement and curbs, landscaping, accessible parking with access aisles, lighting and signage.

Cost of Construction: $100,000 Size: 14,000sq. ft.

PROJECT TYPES: Parking and paving



17


Manchester Security Gate and Guard Station Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center, Battle Creek Michigan


CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable) Pending



POINT OF CONTACT NAME David Kamrowski


24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Appendix C -Page 17

The project renovated the existing entrance to the Federal Building to improve functionality, safety and security. The project included a new guard booth with HVAC. The entrance lanes were widened and a vehicle rejection exit lane was added as well as two vehicle security gates. The work included interior and exterior lighting, power, telephone, data and security to the booth.

Design Services G.H. Forbes Associates provided field survey and construction documents for a new guard station and canopy and vehicle entrance. New work included repaving, new curbs, bollards, fence, signage and crosswalks. Duties for professional services include design/analysis, drawings, specifications and detailed cost estimates

Cost of Construction: $575,000 Size: 9,000sq. ft.




18


Secure Parking Lot Federal Building, Ann Arbor Michigan


CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable) 2010, 2011



POINT OF CONTACT NAME Erlindo Derupe


(312) 353-1314 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Appendix C -Page 18

The project including the design, cost estimate, calculations and specifications required for a secure fence around a portion of a parking lot including secure turnstile with card reader, new vehicle entrance gate, pedestrian gates, ramp and landing.

Design Services G.H. Forbes Associates provided field survey and construction documents for a new guard station and canopy and vehicle entrance. New work included repaving, new curbs, bollards, fence, signage and crosswalks. Construction Administration Services G.H. Forbes Associates provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal Property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code Enforcement. Duties for professional services for the project included construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection.





19


United States Coast Guard Roof Replacement Cleveland, Ohio



2008 PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION

PROJECT OWNER United States Coast Guard

POINT OF CONTACT NAME Lt. Kent D. Hammack,[email protected])



Appendix C -Page 19

This project was executed as a Design-Build project with the general contractor as the lead. This single story USCG building is constructed of a variety of materials and its roof structures are constructed of steel joists with metal deck; wood rafters with steel beams; or metal sheathing systems with steel rafters. The building consists of three distinct roofing systems: asphalt shingled roof, metal corrugated deck with spray polyurethane foam roof, and an EPDM rubber roof. In certain locations, especially under the sections of the asphalt shingle roof and the EPDM rubber roof, the plywood substrate had rotted or was not installed properly. The ages of the various building additions and roofs varied. There are both low-slope and steep-slope roof sections. There are a number of locations where unconventional framing methods were used, resulting in odd angles and conditions that make it difficult for material changes and flashing installation. Also the ceiling plenum / roof attic was generally not ventilated. It is not used as return air plenum as the return system is all ducted. The lack of ventilation in the roof system is only a concern for the steep sloped roof areas. The location of the facility relative to Lake Erie presents harsh weather conditions. The roof is exposed to heavy snow, hard rain, strong winds and hail. These conditions suggest that the material needs to be exceptionally durable and resistant to wind uplift. It also suggests that, should weather damage occur, the repairs are able to be made expeditiously and inexpensively. Systems that would require disassembly of large sections such as with a standing seam metal roof would not be appropriate for this particular roof. There were also aesthetic considerations to be made for the installation of new roofing materials. The colors of the low-sloped roof system and the steep-sloped roof system should be complimentary or match to the greatest degree possible. This will help to create a uniform appearance. Visual recognition of the roof system is prominent as the facility sits in a relatively low location when compared to the street approaches from downtown Cleveland. Another aesthetic consideration is to create harmonic material transitions. In several areas, the line between wall and roof is blurred. The transition of materials and the functionality of flashings need to be carefully considered. Finally, because of the various roof lines and materials, there will be many differing flashing details. Our design will attempt to bring uniformity to the degree possible to the flashing system. Given the design criteria, we determined that a combination of modified bitumen roofing and shingled roof from a single manufacturer was the best solution. A multitude of construction details were required to capture the numerous different field conditions. We corrected the lack of attic ventilation and improved the insulation to meet the current energy code.

PROJECT TYPES Roof Replacement


Construction Adminstration Services G.H.Forbes Associates with NTH Consultants provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code enforcement. Duties for professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection.

BEFORE AFTER BEFORE AFTER

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates with NTH Consultants provided an analysis of the existing roof conditions and created construction documents for a new roof system including associated flashing and other accessories. The detailing and specifications were tailored to the specific site conditions

Appendix C -Page 20



20


FIRE PROTECTION IMPROVEMENTS Federal Building - Lansing, Michigan



Pending



POINT OF CONTACT NAME Ben Warren

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER (312)- 317-9626


The Lansing Federal Building is a two-story, office building, U.S. Courthouse and U. S. Post Office. The intent of the project was to provide a new addressable fire alarm system to protect the basement, first, mezzanine and second levels. The building is an historic structure that posed some acoustic challenges.


Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey and construction documents with AON Fire Protection Engineering (formerly Schirmer Engineering) and EAM Engineers. G.H. Forbes worked with the GSA Historic Preservation Branch to review the installation of new, visible fire alarm devices and determine the best locations to minimize their impact on the historic nature of the building yet provide the proper level of safety for the occupants.


PROJECT TYPES: Fire and security alarm systems Maintenance and facility preservation



21


Reserve Forces Service Center - Building Alterations Dept. of Military and Veterans Affairs - Lansing, Michigan

YEAR COMPLETED

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2009-2010



PROJECT OWNER





Appendix C -Page 21

The existing building dates back to the 1920's and was in need of many improvements to meet current codes. The project encompassed multiple phases with multiple Contractors to remodel the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th floors of an existing four story office building, including restroom upgrades for ADA compliance, mechanical and electrical improvements, demolition and hazardous materials. The penthouse was turned into a mechanical room to accommodate a new air handling unit. New mechanical shafts were added. The existing building included sprinklers only in the basement. This project added a fire pump, stand pipe and sprinklers throughout the building. A LEED Checklist was used to guide the design of the renovation which included increased lighting and temperature controls, daylight harvesting, FSC certified wood and low emitting materials. The exterior of the building was also renovated. Water damage had caused many areas of the brick exterior to pull away from the building. These areas were rebuilt and remaining areas anchored and tuck pointed. Structural supports were also added to the existing roof. Energy improvements included insulating the roof cavity and perimeter walls.

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey and construction documents. New work included steel stud and gypsum board walls to deck; doors and hardware; sinks; toilets; toilet partitions; toilet room accessories; receptacles; data outlets; lighting; fire alarm modifications; fire sprinkler modifications; a new HVAC system; ductwork and HVAC controls. The work also included the exterior renovation of the building including rebuilding the brick veneer, anchoring the brick, installing weep holes, flashing and control joints. Duties of professional services include design/analysis, drawings, specifications and detailed cost estimates. Construction Administration Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field inspection for the project. Professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection.

Size: 39,000 sq.ft. Cost of Construction: Phase 1 of Interior Renovation $1,000,000 Phase 2 of Interior Renovation $1,000,000 Exterior Renovation $600,000

PROJECT RELEVANCE Renovation of existing facilities. Experience with the State of Michigan. Project included ADA facility assessment and remodeling, building envelope investigation, repair, upgrade, HVAC Equipment replacement, upgrade, selection, HVAC controls replacement, upgrade, selection, new lighting, lighting controls, daylight harvesting. Interior remodeling and renovation included low emitting materials and FSC wood.



22


FIRE PROTECTION IMPROVEMENTS Federal Building - Flint, Michigan

YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2007




POINT OF CONTACT NAME Erlindo Derupe

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER 312-353-1314


Appendix C -Page 22

The Flint Federal Building is a three-story federal office building and U.S. Courthouse. The intent of the project was to provide a new addressable fire detection and alarm system and to replace the ceiling, diffusers and lighting in select areas. Some asbestos abatement work was required.

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided field survey and construction documents with AON Fire Protection Engineering (formerly Schirmer Engineering) and EAM Engineers. Duties for professional design services included design development, construction documents, cost estimation and construction administration.


PROJECT TYPES: Fire and security alarm systems



23


USDC Office Space 20/20 Federal Building - Bay City, Michigan


2010 CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable) 2011-2012



POINT OF CONTACT NAME Paul Machalek

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER 312-353-4916


Appendix C -Page 23

The expansion and construction of office space, toilet rooms, a computer room, fitness room and break rooms on the second and third floors of the Federal Building. The building accommodates the U.S. Post Office on the first floor and the U.S. District Court including Clerk of Courts, Probation and Pre Trial Services, a Magistrate Chambers and Courtroom and a Judge's Chambers and Courtroom.

PROJECT TYPES ADA facility assessment and remodeling General architectural and engineering design Interior remodeling and renovation Maintenance and facility preservation Toilet and shower room design Environmental - Asbestos abatement / lead paint mitigation.

Cost of Construction: $1,100,000 Size: 10,000 sq.ft.

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided schematic design, field survey, design and construction documents with NTH Consultants and EAM Engineers for the renovation of the Second and Third Floors of the Federal Building. The work has included identifying and designing processes of the safe, legal removal of asbestos lined floor tile. New work has included steel stud and gypsum board acoustically rated walls; plastic laminate and solid surface cabinetry; doors and hardware; painting; carpet; anti-static floor tile; ceiling systems; receptacles; data outlets; lighting; fire alarm modifications; fire sprinkler modifications; plumbing; ductwork and HVAC controls. The renovation includes 3 phases. Phase 1 work includes the Clerk's Office and Break Room and the Computer Room. Phase 2 work includes the Probation Offices and toilet room. Phase 3 work includes PreTrial Services Offices and toilet room, the staff break room, Fitness Room, Shower Room and Locker Area, and the Public toilet room. Professional design services included design development, construction documents, cost estimate and project specifications. Construction Administration Services G.H. Forbes Associates with NTH Consultants and EAM Engineers provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code Enforcement. Duties for professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection.



24


Building Automation System Upgrades - ARRA Theodore Levin U.S.Courthouse - Detroit, Michigan



2011-2012



POINT OF CONTACT NAME Paul Machalek



Appendix C -Page 24

The expansion and construction of office space, break room, jury room, and toilet rooms on the first floors of the Federal Building. The building is a two-story, 80,000 sq. ft. office building and courthouse. The Lobby, Public Corridors and some other interior spaces are considered historic. G.H. Forbes Associates worked with GSA Historic Preservation to design the renovation including modifications to the Lobby.

PROJECT TYPES ADA facility assessment and remodeling General architectural and engineering design HVAC equipment replacement, upgrade, selection Interior remodeling and renovation Maintenance and facility preservation Environmental - Asbestos abatement / lead paint mitigation.


Construction Administration Services G.H. Forbes Associates with NTH Consultants and EAM Engineers provided field inspection for the project. Because the project occurred on Federal property, Forbes acted as the Inspector for Code Enforcement. Duties for professional services for the project included consultant coordination, construction administration, shop drawing review, responding to contractor requests for information and field inspection.

Design Services G.H.Forbes Associates provided schematic design, field survey, design and construction documents with NTH Consultants and EAM Engineers for the renovation of the First Floor of the Federal Building. The work has included identifying and designing processes of the safe, legal removal of asbestos lined floor tile. New work has included steel stud and gypsum board acoustically rated walls; plastic laminate cabinetry and solid surface counters; doors and hardware; painting; carpet; ceiling systems; receptacles; data outlets; lighting; fire alarm modifications; fire sprinkler modifications; plumbing; ductwork and HVAC controls. The constant-volume HVAC system was upgraded to a variable air volume HVAC system for energy conservation and increased user control. Professional design services included design development, construction documents, cost estimate and project specifications.

APPENDIX D

Quality Control Documents

1

G.H. FORBES ASSOCIATES 225 Main Street / Suite 200 Royal Oak, Michigan 48067 248 542-7866 / Fax 542-7909 ��

Architecture/Planning

MEETING #

Construction Progress Meeting

Project: Date: Time: Attendees: Via Teleconference:

The purpose of this meeting was to review the progress of construction.

1. The group reviewed the three-week look ahead and the schedule.

2. Submittals were discussed.

3. RFIs were discussed.

4. The group reviewed the change order status.

5. New Issues were discussed.

6. The next meeting is scheduled for. . .

If there is any misunderstanding, please notify the office of the architect within 5 days. GHFAA Initials Date

G.H. FORBES ASSOCIATES 225 South Main Street, Suite 200 Royal Oak, Michigan 48067 248 542‐7866 / Fax 248 542‐7909

CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT #Project Name:

Project Location:

Project Number:

Contract Number:

General Contractor:

Date & Time of Inspection:

CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT #

Company: Schedule:

Date & Time of Inspection:

Contractor's Superintendent and other Participants:

Inspected By:

Materials/Equipment on site:

Minority:

Female:

As‐Built Documents: Weather:Clean Project? (Rate A‐F):

EEO Compliance: Labor Interviews:

1. Number and Trade(s) of Construction Workers on Site:

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

FF.

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

2. Activities on Site During Inspection:

3. Work Completed Since Last Inspection & Project Status:

A.

B.

C.D.E.

4 Aspects of Construction Inspected:4. Aspects of Construction Inspected:

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

5. Discrepancies ‐Problems ‐ Delays

A.

BB

C.

6. Are there any Safety Issues?

A.

7. Are there any outstanding RFI's?

A.

8 Are there any outstanding Change Orders?8. Are there any outstanding Change Orders?

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

9 Tests Witnessed:9. Tests Witnessed:

A.

10. New Issues?

A.

B.

C.

D.

11. Further action(s) required by the Contractor, A/E, GSA,Tenant:

A.

B.

C.

D.

12. Scheduled Work for the next 2 weeks:

AA.

B.

Photo 1:

13. Site Photos:

Photo 1:

End of Report

of 4

Mechanical Engineering Field Survey and Design Check List

General (Pre-Design Items)

o Review Work Order, codes, standards, etc.

o Site verification.

o Information required from Owner prior to pre-design meeting. (Building profile, existing

MEP,

o Etc.)

o Pre-design meeting.

Plumbing

o Verify all storm, sanitary, domestic cold water and fire protection piping locations.

o Coordinate so that no piping is routed over electrical panels.

o Hose bibbs/wall hydrants required?

o Invert elevations for storm and sanitary systems.

o Are isometric domestic and sanitary risers required?

o Check incoming water pressures.

o Expansion compensation required on hot water and hot water return?

o Is there drain tile on project? Is a sump required?

o Elevator sumps?

o Total cubic feet per hour of gas listed at meter.

o Is gas riser diagram on drawings with dimensions and CFH’s at all equipment connections.

o Verify inlet/discharge pressure.

o Emergency generator – natural gas, gas or diesel?

o Provide gas solenoid for connection into F.P. systems in kitchens.

o Floor or wall mounted water closets?

o Drains at water storage tanks.

o Floor drain or sink provided for coil condensate drain?

o Coordinate locations of EWC’s and disposals with electrical.

o Is wall space (thickness) provided for EWC cooler?

o Is remote cooler required?

o Backflow preventers shown?

o At meter.

o At HVAC equipment.

o At food service equipment.

of 4

o Aquastats, recirc pumps and ASME expansion tanks shown for water heaters.

Piping

o Expansion loops, anchors, pipe guides shown?

o Heating hot water.

o Domestic hot water and recirculation.

o All mechanical devices controlled?

o Pumps?

o Boilers?

o General notes:

o Heating piping?

o Insulation?

o Fin-tube radiation, if applicable?

o Check pressures required for gas fired equipment.

o Moisture traps for compressed air.

o Air removal devices shown?

Fire Protection

o Fire protection notes shown? Location of water bell, strobe and basic panel?

o Is correct Hazard Group listed?

o Are standpipes required?

o Check residual and static pressures.

o Dry-pipe system required?

o Siamese connection located on plan?

o Are all items coordinated with electrical? Smoke detectors, tampers, flow switches, etc.

HVAC

o Local all thermostats.

o Are smoke/fire dampers shown? Combination dampers? Power requirements?

o Diffusers coordination with reflected ceiling plan and lighting plan. Verify all ceiling types.

o Ductwork coordination with structural plans and lighting.

o Static calculations for ductwork.

o How are mechanical devices controlled? Who provides control/starter/switches?

o Exhaust fans.

o HVAC units.

o Unit heaters.

o Minimum distances for exhaust and intakes coordinated.

of 4

o Louvers, intakes, relief duct roof opening, etc., coordinated with Architectural plans (size

and location).

o Smoke detectors provided? If so,

o At unit?

o In ductwork?

o Provide Air Balance Schedule for all kitchens.

o Filter efficiencies, pre-filters, final filters.

o Intake hoods interlocked with exhaust.

o CO2 sensors?

o Wall types checked? (Smoke, Fire, Acoustic)

o Ventilation for Mechanical Rooms:

o Summer ventilation.

o Ventilation for refrigerants.

o Outside air requirements to be met.

o CFM per Person

o Kitchens

o Toilet Rooms

o Lockers

o Garages

o Mechanical Rooms

o Hood/Lavatories

o Negative/Positive Requirements

o CFM per Square Foot

o Electrical/Computer Rooms:

o Cooling

o Ventilation

o If self-contained ceiling units, duct condenser air out of plenum.

o Humidification required?

o Differential pressure switches shown for any filter banks.

o Weights, locations and penetration sizes given to Architect for roof mounted equipment?

o Does plenum need heat?

o All HVAC equipment coordinated with specifications and electrical.

o Ductwork coordinated with specifications.

o Building Air Balance completed?

o What type of relief air system is indicated?

of 4

Controls

o Control panels shown (correct size?) and coordinated with electrical?

o Transformer locations for VAV boxes/dampers?

o 2-way or 3-way control valve at coils? Check type. No plug type allowed.

o All sequences listed in specifications.

o Check manufacturers specified.

o Are all pieces of equipment listed with sequences?

o Is there a full building management system (BMS)?

o If so, points list, graphics packages and personnel training.

o Who is providing unit control devices?

o Factory mounted or field mounted?

o In shop drawings, call for a minimum of the following:

o Sequence of operations (in all modes, i.e., occupied, unoccupied, morning warm-up,

night purge, VAV, etc.)

o Points list summaries.

o Wiring diagrams.

o Full system capability description.

General

o Voltages coordinated with electrical.

o Drawing titles and sheet titles match.

o Issued for dates and designations correct and coordinate with electrical and architectural.

o All equipment scheduled and called out on drawings.

o Provide required sections, i.e., mechanical room, corridors, etc.

o Are all backgrounds up to date?

o Is graphic scale correct?

o Elevators:

o Sumps.

o Sprinklers and shut off valves?

o Are all general notes on plans? Coordinate with specifications and eliminate redundancy.

o Has all electrical coordination been done? (Compare all schedules, floor plans, equipment

locations, roof plans, control devices, etc.)

o As part of submittal drawings, verify all questions to Owner are bubbled.

of 5

1

1

1

2

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Provided dwg/spec

Not Applicable 11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

2009 Michigan Building Code

Show proposed finish grades, grade floor elevations, street elevations.

Identify the total number of accessible parking spaces provided, including van accessible spaces.(1106.1; 1106.5)

List codes applicable to project (107.2.1) The MBC or the MBC Section 34, or the Michigan Rehab Code may be used for existing buildings .

Indicate the location of all new and existing utilities, including the entrance points into the building and the FDClocation

Identify all structures to be demolished

Fax number of the registered design professional

DATE SUBMITTED

PROJECT NAME

PROJECT ADDRESS

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST

Including Building Permit Application ChecklistThis checklist is a convenient reference to the 2009 Michigan Building Code. The checklist summarizes the minimum data required by the MBC to be onconstruction documents for the examination and approval of a building permit application for non-residential and multi-family projects. Depending on thetype and complexity of the project, additional information not indicated on this checklist may be required by the MBC or the Building Official [105.3(7),;107.1] Applicants are encouraged to indicate if the required data is applicable to the project, or not applicable, and attach a copy of the completedchecklist to the construction documents.

Please contact the local building department for requirements regarding phased construction or tenent finishes. Thank you for taking time to completethis checklist. Having the necessary information at the beginning of the plan review process will help expedite the issuance of a building permit.

for the

Address of individual to receive review comments

Telephone number of the registered design professional

JOB NUMBER/TRACKING NUMBER

CHECKLIST PREPARED BY

Michigan license number of registered design professional

REPRESENTING

Name, Michigan license number, address, telephone number, and fax number of the registered design professional in responsiblecharge (unless waived by the Building Official) (107.3.4)

Name of individual to receive review comments

Name of the registered design professional

INFORMATION REQUIRED ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 105.3(4)

Owner's name and mailing address

Indicate the project name and address on the plans if available. (105.3.(2); 107.2.1)

Show property lines; identify building distances from property lines and from other buildings on-site.

Address of registered design professional

The Michigan licensed Registered Design Professional must provide original signature, seal and date on all sheets of the drawingsand specification manual or on the index sheet of the drawings and specification manual only when the index sheet covers all thesheets that makeup the drawing set and specifcation manual (107.1; 107.3.4)

List of all proposed deferred submittal documents (107.3.4.2)

Telephone number of individual to receive review comments

Show flood plain elevations and boundaries.

SITE PLANS (107.2.5)

Identify all existing & proposed construction

Identify the total number of parking spaces provided.

3

of 5

35

Provided dwg/spec

Not Applicable 36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

Provide dimensions and details for all interior accessible routes within the building.Include the maneuvering clearance required at all doors. (1104)

Construction space venting

INFORMATION REQUIRED ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 105.3(4) (CONT.)

Show location of portable fire extinguishers. (906.1)

Provide flame spread and smoke development documentation for all foam plastics and details on the foam plasticinsulation thermal barriers (107.2.1; 2603.1)

Show exterior wall details (107.2.1; 107.2.4; 1401.1)

All base, sill, jamb and head flashings

Means of water drainage

End conditions

Control joints

Intersection at roof, eaves or parapets

Details around openings

Provide stairway details with all guard and handrail details (1009)

Provide dimensions and details for all use group requirements. Including features andfacilities required to be accessible (1107) (1108) (1109)

Show type and thickness of all glazing materials and safety glazing where required (2401.1)

Provide plumbing fixture and accessory details (1109)

Indicate heights, clearances and turning radii along all accessible routes (1104)

Roof overflow drains [P] 1503.4

Corners

Provide complete dimensions, running slope and cross slope of all accessible parking spaces and accessible routesfrom the accessible parking to the accessible entrances. (107.2.1; 1104.1)

Show site grading (slope away) of the ground immediately adjacent to the foundation of the building

Indicate Use Group. Indicate mixed use option if applicable (302.1)

Provide door hardware, door and window details including type, size, material, and hourly rating required. (107.2.1;1008.1)

Provide complete dimensions for all rooms and spaces including stairs, aisles, passageways, corridors, areasaround counters, fixtures, all circulation and egress paths, and maneuvering clearance at all doors (107.2.1; 1003.1)(1101.2).

Provide signage details, including location, wording, size and mounting height. (1110)

Provide details showing the proposed assembly of all walls, floors roofs, and stairs (107.2.1; 107.2.3; 107.2.4)

Show location and provide details of all fire and smoke rated assemblies and protection of penetrations includingpermanent markings and identifications. Provide U.L. design number or other approval rating. (107.2.1; 701.1;703.6; 712.1; 713.1)

BUILDING PLANS

Provide Key Plan if needed to identify the location of the proposed work (107.2.1)

Indicate total area of building, number of stories, and provide height and area calculations including open perimeter& fire suppression increases. (501.1)

Indicate Type of Construction (602.1)

Indicate the use of all rooms and spaces. Indicate number of occupants on every floor, room and space. Showmethod used to determine the occupant load and means of egress requirements. (107.2.1; 107.2.3; 1004.1)

Indicate if a full or limited area Fire Suppression system & Fire Alarm system will be installed

Provide details of room finishes including type of materials with flame spread and smoke development ratingsindicated for all materials. (801.1) (803) (107.2.1) (2603.1) Documentation for the flame spread and smokedevelopment of all materials must be provided at field inspection.

Provide accessibility details (107.2.1; 1101.2)

Show location of all exit signs and means of egress lighting (1006.1; 1011.1)

Show masonry sizes, grades,reinforcement, anchorages, loads and compressive strengths; provide masonryfireplace details and clearances. 2101.3(1) thru 2101.3.3 (9); 2101.3.1)

Water-resistive membrane

Show location and hourly rating of all fire doors, fire dampers and fire windows (715.1) (716.1)

Intersection with dissimilar materials

of 5

76

Provided dwg/spec

Not Applicable 77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

Floor Live Load (1603.1.1)

Show design of water supply and distribution including sizes, depths and materials (P601.1)

Show foundation dimensions and details (107.2.1; 1603.1; 1801.2)

Show all underground plumbing and building riser diagram (P106.3.1)

Roof Live Load (1603.1.2)

Indicate design loads (1603.1)

STRUCTURAL PLANS (107.2.1; 1603.1)

Show lighting system design, circuits, switches, materials, equipment listing, light fixtures and installation instructions(2701.1 NEC 110.2, 110.3)

Single line diagram including available fault current and bus bracing

Indicate protection of conductors (NEC 240.3)

Electrical layout (Michigan Part 8 - 80.21)

Wattage Schedule (Michigan Part 8-80.21)

Service Location and Riser Diagram (Michigan Part 8-80.21)

Indicate wiring methods, conduits and materials (NEC 300)

Load Calculations (Michigan Part 8-80.21)

PLUMBING PLANS (P106.3.1)

Indicate wiring and materials in ducts, plenums and equipment

Show ground fault protection (NEC 230.95)

Verify working space in front of equipment (NEC 110.26, 110.32, 110.34)

Show power system design, circuits, materials, equipment listing and installation instructions (2701.1 NEC 110.2,110.3)

Indicate grounding of electrical system (NEC 250)

Show design of emergency electrical system (NEC 700)

Indicate means of disconnect and number and location (NEC 230.70, 240.13)

Show service conductors, conductor sizes, ratings and insulation (NEC 230)

Indicate interrupting rating (NEC 110.9, 110.10, 230.205)

Earthquake Design Data (1603.1.5.1 thru 1603.1.5.10)

Indicate load bearing value of soils (1603.1.6; 1801.2; 1803.6 (5))

Guard & Handrail (1607.7)

Indicate ratings of materials installed in wet locations (NEC 358)

Ground snow load (1603.1.2)

Indicate the location, size and cross section of all structural members with dimensions, column centers and offsets (1603.1)

Short circuit calculations for circuit breaker installation

Indicate any special Loads (1603.1.8)

List all Design/Construction Standards and material specifications (107.2.1)

Identify lateral resistive system(s) including lateral bracing and transfer and collection systems (1604.4; 1604.9)

ELECTRICAL PLANS (106.1.1)

Roof Snow Load (1603.1.3)

Wind Design Data (1603.1.4)

Show hazardous locations and materials used

Show egress emergency lighting (1001.1, 1006.1, 1011.1)

Show exit signs and lighting and power supply (1001.1, 1011.1)


Light fixture schedule

of 5

120

Provided dwg/spec

Not Applicable 121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

Provide heating and cooling load calculations (M106.3.1; 312.1)

Show compliance with International Energy Conservation Code (M301.2)

Provide calculations for combustion air and exhaust air (M701.2)

Show equipment locations, service clearances and service access (M306.1)

Provide hood sizing: show top, side and front views ( M507.4, 507.5, 507.11, 507.12)

Show fire/smoke damper locations and details including rating (607.1)

Show provisions for ventilation air, natural or mechanical (M401.2; 401.4)

HVAC systems

Show ductwork layout including gauges, hangers and sizing (M603.1)

Provide velocity, cfm and location of ventilation equipment (507.13)

Provide documentation for Special Inspector (M513.3)

Show protection of penetrations through all rated assemblies (M302.2)

Show locations for inlets, outlets and heights for exhaust equipment and hoods (M502)

Exhaust and ventilation systems (M501.1, M401.1)

Provide piping layout, load calculations and meter location (IFGC 402)

Show duct insulation details including R-factor and Perm. rating (M604.1)

Show location of vents for all fuel fired appliances (M804)

Commercial kitchen hoods Type 1 and Type 2 (M507.1)

Provide duct layout, grease door location and method of attachment (M506.3)

Show hazardous exhaust systems (M510.1)

Show method of smoke control (M513)

Provide fire protection for Type 1 hoods (M509)

Provide make-up air and equipment control diagram (M508.1)

Provide exhaust equipment specifications, cfm and static pressure (M106.3.1)

Show energy loads, equipment locations and equipment specifications including cfm andsystem static (M301.4; 303.1; 304.1)

Provide system operating pressure and pressure regulator detail (IFGC 402, 416)

Determine design class as hazardous or non-hazardous. Provide MCDS data sheets tosupport hazardous level indicated (M510.1)

Fuel piping systems

Show hot water return circulation (if required) (P607.2; 607.2.3)

Indicate control of thermal expansion (P607.3)

Indicate hot water heater relief valve discharge (P504)

Show plumbing fixture layout (P401.1, P106.3.1)

Provide water use calculations (P106.3.1)

Show locations, equipment sizes and hookups for all boilers and water heaters (M1001.2)

Provide details of water system design (P601.1)

Show locations of smoke duct detectors in both return and supply ducts (M606.1)

MECHANICAL PLANS (M106.3.1)

Provide occupancy calculations for plumbing fixtures provided (Table P403.1)

Show provisions for combustion air supply and venting (M701.2)

Show design of storm water management system including sizes, depths, slopes, materials and cleanouts (P1101.2)

Indicate water temperature control devices (P607.1)

Show design and location of sanitary drains and vent systems including sizes, depths, slopes, materials andcleanouts (P701.1)

Show all backflow prevention devices and type of device (P106.3.1, 601.1, 608)


Hydronic Systems

Show details for any hazardous waste system (P702.5)

Provide calculations for rainfall rates and water retention amounts(P1101.7,1105,1106,1107)

Show complete process piping diagram (M1201.1; 1201.2)

of 5

170

Provided dwg/spec

Not Applicable 171

#REF!

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

Provided Not Applicable

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

Last update 4-15-11


BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST

Provide ratings for all hoods (M507.1)

Provide refrigerant piping diagram (1107.1)

Refrigeration (1101.1)

Provide refrigerant classification (M1103.1)

Provide occupancy classification (M1103.2)

Provide quantity of maximum allowable refrigerant (M1103.1)

Provide details for refrigeration system enclosure requirements (M1105)

Provide pressure tests for all non-factory or field erected equipment and appliances(M1108)

Provide classification for refrigeration system (M1103.3)

Soils Report - Prepared by a State Licensed Registered Design Professional. The reports must have the State LicensedRegistered Design Professional's original signature, seal and date. (1802.1)Energy Calculations and details to show compliance to the Michigan Uniform Energy Code Part 10a rules R408.31087 toR408.31099. (1301.1.1)

Please contact the local jurisdiction to determine what additional information may be required, the number of sets of documents to be submitted and/or the requirements for phased construction or tenant finish permits.

Contact information provided: Name, Address, Business phone , Cell phone, Fax number and Email address

Building Permit Application filled out completely and signed by the Applicant (105.1; 105.3)

Construction Documents and Specification Manual, if used - Signed, sealed and dated by a State Licensed Registered DesignProfessional (107.1).

Provide Type 2 hoods for dishwashers (M507.2).2

Provide complete appliance lineup under Type 1 hoods (M507.13)

NOTE: The review of premanufactured housing requires a copy of the building systems approval report, a copy of the original plans and a site plan.

Structural Calculations - For all structural members and foundations. Include the deflection limits and all load calculations. All calculations must have the State Licensed Registered Design Professional's original signature, seal and date. (107.1)

Hazardous Materials - If hazardous materials are to be stored, dispensed, or used for manufacturing or processing; describe the type, use, quantity, location, and method of storage of all materials. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) must be submitted. The construction drawings shall address the requirements of the MBC for High hazard use if quantities above the exempt amounts are proposed. Hazardous materials will also be reviewed by the Fire Department. (107.2.1; 307)

Valuation: State the valuation of the proposed work. (105.3, 5)

Describe the business use and its intended operation (105.3. 3)

Statement of Special Inspections - Include a complete list of materials and work requiring special inspections, the inspections tobe performed and their frequencies. Provide a list of agencies and firms you propose to conduct each of the inspections and thequalifications, credentials and experience for each of the individuals (1704.1; 1704.1.1)