state of the carbon cycle (nacp and gcp): have components and their uncertainties changed over...

49
State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP): Have components and their uncertainties changed over time? Anna M. Michalak With contributions from: Kevin Bowman, Ken Davis, Yuanyuan Fang, Debbie Huntzinger, Tony King, Andrew Richardson, Kevin Schaefer, Christopher Schwalm Source: Griffith et al. (20

Upload: arnon

Post on 26-Feb-2016

18 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Source: Griffith et al. (2013). State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP): Have components and their uncertainties changed over time?. Anna M. Michalak - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP): Have components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Anna M. MichalakWith contributions from: Kevin Bowman, Ken Davis, Yuanyuan Fang, Debbie Huntzinger, Tony King, Andrew Richardson, Kevin Schaefer, Christopher Schwalm

Source: Griffith et al. (2013)

Page 2: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

NOT MUCHAnna M. Michalak

Page 3: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

North American Carbon Sources and Sinks: Magnitude, Attribution and Uncertainty

Anthony KingDaniel Hayes Deborah HuntzingerTristram WestWilfred Post

4th NACP All Investigators MeetingFebruary 4, 2013

Albuquerque, New Mexico

Page 4: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Terrestrial sink (2000-2005): meta-synthesis of NACP regional interim synthesis

Slide from: Tony King (ORNL)

Page 5: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

NACP and RECCAP comparison

For reference:SOCCR (2007) estimate was -500 ± 250 Tg C yr-1

NCA (King et al 2012) synthesis estimate was -634 ± 165 Tg C yr-1

Slide from: Tony King (ORNL)

UNPUBLISHED RECCAP DATA REMOVED FROM PRESENTATION HERE

Page 6: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Inter-method comparison Slide from: Tony King (ORNL)

UNPUBLISHED RECCAP DATA REMOVED FROM PRESENTATION HERE

Page 7: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

The trouble with …

“Small” residuals

“Intermediate”scales

Boundary conditions

Page 8: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

The trouble with …

“Small” residuals

“Intermediate”scales

Boundary conditions

Page 9: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Net sink is small residual of photosynthesis and respiration

Huntzinger et al. (Ecol. Model. 2012)

e.g. Over NA:GPP: 12.2 to 32.9 PgC yr-1

NEP: -0.7 to 2.2 PgC yr-1

Page 10: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Net annual sink is small residual of large seasonal cycle

Huntzinger et al. (Ecol. Model. 2012)

e.g. Over NA:Monthly: up to 0.8 PgC mt-1

Annual: up to 2.2 PgC yr-1 ~ 0.2 PgC

mt-1

Page 11: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Net biospheric sink is small residual of total flux and fossil fuel emissions

King et al. (SOCCR report, 2007)

e.g. Over NA:FF: 1.85 PgC yr-1 Bio: ~ 0.5 PgC yr-1

Page 12: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

The trouble with …

“Small” residuals

“Intermediate”scales

Boundary conditions

Page 13: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Global constraint and local constraint, but…

Requires: Downscaling or upscaling in space and time

Page 14: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Annual mean prior flux (gC/m2/day)

Annual mean posterior flux (gC/m2/day) Post-prior (gC/m2/day)

Spatial attribution of CO2

Slide modified from: Kevin Bowman (JPL)

PRELIMINARY UNPUBLISHED RESULTS

Page 15: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

RECCAP-TransCom3 results

Updated inversions

Slide from: Tony King (ORNL)

UNPUBLISHED RECCAP DATA REMOVED FROM PRESENTATION HERE

UNPUBLISHED RECCAP DATA REMOVED FROM PRESENTATION HERE

Page 16: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Upscaling of eddy covariance data

Figures from: Martin Jung (MPI-BGC)

Page 17: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

The trouble with …

“Small” residuals

“Intermediate”scales

Boundary conditions

Page 18: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

e.g. 0.5ppm uncertainty on incoming [CO2]

Page 19: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Gourdji et al. (BG 2012)

Page 20: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

The trouble with …

“Small” residuals

“Intermediate”scales

Boundary conditions

Page 21: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Paths forward…

“Small” residuals

“Intermediate”scales

Boundary conditions

Page 22: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Combine multiple estimates…

“Small” residuals

“Intermediate”scales

Boundary conditions

e.g. Averaging, binning, prescribing simulation protocol, etc.

Page 23: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Inter-method comparison Slide from: Tony King (ORNL)

UNPUBLISHED RECCAP DATA REMOVED FROM PRESENTATION HERE

Page 24: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Seasonal spatial patternsGourdji et al. (BG 2012); Yadav and Michalak (GMD, in press)

Page 25: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

RECCAP-TRENDY Terrestrial biosphere model (TBM) results for North America

Slide from: Tony King (ORNL)

UNPUBLISHED RECCAP DATA REMOVED FROM PRESENTATION HERE

Page 26: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Paths forward…

“Small” residuals

“Intermediate”scales

Boundary conditions

Page 27: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Tackle bigger components…

Big signals

“Intermediate”scales

Boundary conditions

e.g. Component fluxes, phenology, seasons, etc.

Page 28: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Gross Primary Productivity Net Ecosystem Productivity

Huntzinger et al. (Ecol. Model. 2012)

Page 29: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

NACP Regional Interim Synthesis Activity

Long-Term Mean (2000-2005) Summer (June, July, August) Net Ecosystem Productivity

Huntzinger et al. (2012) Ecological Modeling

Slide from: Debbie Huntzinger (NAU)

Page 30: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Combining multiple estimates of big components

Big signals

“Intermediate”scales

Boundary conditions

Page 31: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

NACP Regional Interim

Synthesis vs. MsTMIP

Mean GPP for North America (2000-2005)

5 models (CLM, DLEM, LPJ, ORCHIDEE, VEGAS)

RangeInterquartile rangeMedian

Does strict protocol help to isolate sources if different in model output?

Slide from: Debbie Huntzinger (NAU)

PRELIMINARY UNPUBLISHED RESULTS

Page 32: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

MsTMIP modelsSteady-state results

10 models

• GPP varies by factor of 2 in tropics

• Soil carbon pool size in NHL ranges from 5 – 60 kg C m-2

• Total living biomass varies by factor of 3.5 in tropics

RangeInterquartile rangeMedian

Slide from: Debbie Huntzinger (NAU)

PRELIMINARY UNPUBLISHED RESULTS

Page 33: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Compare simulated GPP to other GPP products:

MODIS-GPP (Zhao and Running, 2010)MPI-BGC (Jung et al., 2011, Beer et al., 2010)

Slide modified from: Debbie Huntzinger (NAU)

PRELIMINARY UNPUBLISHED RESULTS

Page 34: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Group model estimates of GPP based on model’s treatment of photosynthesis, disturbance and other factors.

The entire modeling framework influences a model’s results

Huntzinger et al. (2012) Ecological Modeling

Binning / grouping of modelsSlide modified from: Debbie Huntzinger (NAU)

Page 35: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Paths forward…

“Small” residuals

“Intermediate”scales

Boundary conditions

Page 36: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Tackle different scales…

“Small” residuals

Non-continentalscales

Boundary conditions

e.g. Eddy covariance towers, regional intensives, etc.

Page 37: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Regional measurement campaigns

Midcontinent intensive, 2007-2009

INFLUX, 2010-201?

Gulf coast intensive, 2013-201?

N. American tower CO2 network circa 2008Slide from: Ken Davis (Penn State)

Page 38: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Schuh et al, in press, GCB

Atmospheric inversions and agricultural inventory agree!

Inversions and inventory have similar uncertainty bounds!

Slide from: Ken Davis (Penn State)

Page 39: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Tackle different scales for big components

Bigsignals

Non-continentalscales

Boundary conditions

Page 40: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Phenology (Richardson et al.)

• Early/late uptake means positive GPP bias• Models need better phenology

Slide from: Kevin Schaefer (NSIDC)

NACP Site Synthesis

Page 41: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

GPP Biases (Schaefer et al., 2012)G

PP B

ias

(mm

ol m

-2 s

-1)

Fall too lateSpring too early

Need Low Temperature

Shutoff

Need Improved LUE/Vcmax

Slide from: Kevin Schaefer (NSIDC)

Page 42: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Tackle specific features…

“Small” residuals

“Intermediate”scales

Patterns

e.g. Patterns, trends, anomalies, sensitivities…

Page 43: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Slide from: Yuanyuan Fang (Carnegie Inst. Sci.)

6

1

2

34

5

7

7654321

7654321

Fine scale inversion for selecting TBMs at biome scale from among NACP RIS models with sub-diurnal variability

Page 44: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Tackle features of big components

Bigsignals

“Intermediate”scales

Patterns

Page 45: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Anomaly = Drought – Baseline Mean

Reduced Carbon Uptake and Evaporation, Increased Heating

Carbon uptake decreased by 37% and 160% in forests and grasslandsincreased in woody savannas… respiration slowed more than productivity

Evaporation decreased by 25%, 5%, and 16% for ENF, GRA, and WSA temperatures increased by ~0.4 °C

Slide from: Christopher Schwalm

“Carbon and Water Impacts of the Turn of the Century Drought in Western

North America 2000-2004”

Page 46: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

*Anomaly = Drought Mean – Baseline Mean

Reduction in Carbon Uptake Offset 45% of Normal Sink

Term[Tg C y-1]

Source Drought Anomaly*

Baseline Flux

Percent Reduction

GPP MODIS -234 2424 10%

GPP Upscaled FLUXNET

-182 2148 8%

NEP Inversions -30-83

177188

17%44%

NEP Flux Tower Network

-298 623 48%

Slide from: Christopher Schwalm

Page 47: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Paths forward….

Bigsignals

Non-continentalscales

Patterns

Page 48: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Address first and look for convergence

Page 49: State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP):  Have  components and their uncertainties changed over time?

Acknowledgments: Cited intercomparison, synthesis, and collaborative observational efforts• NOAA ESRL Cooperative Air Sampling Network• FLUXNET / AmeriFlux• TransCom3• SOCCR• MCI• NACP Site Synthesis• NACP RCIS• TRENDY• RECCAP• NASA Carbon Monitoring System• National Climate Assessment• MsTMIP