state wildlife action plans alternatively comprehensive wildlife conservation strategies (cwcs),...
TRANSCRIPT
Keeping the Common Species Funded: State Wildlife Action Plans and the DoD INRMP Template from
an Author’s Perspective
David McNaughton, PA Dept. of Military and Veterans Affairs
Ft. Indiantown Gap [email protected] 717-861-8408
Presented at DoD the Natural Resources Conservation Workshop, 12 March 2015
State Wildlife Action Plans• Alternatively Comprehensive
Wildlife Conservation Strategies (CWCS), State Comprehensive Wildlife Plans (SCWP), Etc.
• Created By The States To Support USFWS
• Defines Statewide Priorities For State Wildlife Grant Program– Much Like INRMP Defines
Conservation Priorities for Service Funding
– Priority Habitats as Well as Species
Responsibility• SWAPs Include State
Responsibilities– Percentage of Total Range
Nationwide Within State– Percentage of Total
Population Nationwide Within State
– Distribution of State Within Range (“Core” Populations)
– Includes Common Species, Edge of Range Rarities
INRMP Applicability
• Section 1.d. Responsibilities (2) External Stakeholders– Sets the Need and
Commitments for Cooperation
– Sets Timeline for State Agency Review(s)
• Section 1.e. Authority– Discuss State Code– State-Owned, Federally-
Leased Property May Have to Comply With State Version of ESA
INRMP Applicability (Cont’d)• 2.a.2. Regional Land Uses
– ACUB Opportunities and Priorities
– Chance to Discuss Cross-Boundary Priorities
• 2.c.3. and 2.c.4. Fauna and Flora Descriptions– Tie-in and Highlight State
Responsibility Species• 3.d. Beneficial Partnerships
and Collaborative Resource Planning
• 3.f. Encroachment Partnering
INRMP Applicability (Cont’d)
• 3.g. A Whole Section Just for State Comprehensive Wildlife Plans!– Include the Shared
Species Lists– Discuss Monitoring and
Annual Programs– Discuss the SWAP
Revision Cycle and Coordination with Annual and 5-Year Reviews
• 4.c. Law Enforcement, 4.d. Fish and Wildlife Management, 4.m. Outdoor Recreation– Common Topics for Partnering
and Benefits to States– Often the Most Approachable
Partnerships• 4.p. Training of NR Personnel
– Include State-Assisted Opportunities
– Include Window for State Agency Personnel in In-House Training
• 5.c. Use of Cooperative Agreements
INRMP Applicability (Cont’d)
T&E Discussions
• 2.c.1. General Biotic Environment, T&E AND Species of Concern
• 3.b. Natural Resources Consultation Requirements
• 4.a. T&E Program Elements• Appendices 7 and 8
Endangered Spp. and Critical Habitat– Include State Species If State
Lists and Code Are Applicable– Include State Rarities as
Species of Concern
Funding• National Guard Has STEPs
for State-Listed Species on State-Owned Installations
• Use INRMP Text for State Wildlife Grant Applications
• Use INRMP Meetings to Develop Relationships and Communicate Opportunities
• Seek State Partners In-Kind Assistance
• Use State Partners to Attract Volunteers