states and uts to respond by 10.3.2015 supreme court case wp (c) no.330 of 2001 - abhishek kadyan
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
1/32
'M. PRASAD
SECRETARY
MOST U RG ENT
S UPREM E COU RT M AnER
Governmentof India
Ministryof UrbanDevelopment
NirmanShawan,NewDelhi-110011
D.O. No. N-11025/62/2015-LSG-1
February 27, 2015
Dear
I would like to draw your attention to Hon'ble Supreme Court's order dated
6.2.2015 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 330 of 2001 (Common Cause vs Union of India)
regarding functioning of slaughter houses in the country vis-a-vis enforcement of
standards laid down by the Bureau of Indian Standards regarding the disposal of
animal wastes and slurry and regarding ante-mortem and post-mortem inspection of
meat animals. Copy of the order is enclosed for your perusal.
2. The Hon'ble Supreme Court hasdirected that action should be taken as under:-
i.
State Governments shall set up State Committees for overseeing the
functioning of the slaughter houses (Vide its order dated 23.8.2012). Copy
of order is enclosed.
ii. The Chairman of each State Committee will be the Secretary in the
Department of Urban Development in the State Government.
iii. For monitoring the meetings of the activities of the State Committees,
Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Govt. of India will be the nodal
officer. He will coordinate with the State Committees and obtain
information from them as required from time to time.
iv. In the first instance, the Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Govt. of
India (Nodal Officer) will ascertain and state on affidavit whether all the
States have set up the Committee, in terms of the order passed by the
Supreme Court on 23.8.2012 and whether they are functioning, in terms of
para 4 of the Order of the Supreme Court dated 27.8.2013. Copy of order is
enclosed.
v. The Nodal Officer will also inform the Supreme Court whether the
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules, 2000 are being
implemented and enforced and whether the broad framework prepared by
the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India for the State
Committees for slaughter houses is being followed.
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
2/32
\
/
I
I
J
3. The' case is coming up for hearing o 27 3 2 15 I, therefore, request you to
, provlde the updated status In respect of your State / UT
terms of the points
indica~ed at para 2 (iv) . {v) above at the earliest and preferably by 10.3.2015 so that
the Hon'ble Supreme Courtcould be informed.
The matter may please be acCorded Priority.
Yours sincerely,
6/~ ~
/ . M. Prasat{L_--
Encl.: As above
AllChief Secretaries / Administrators of States/UTs As per list enclosed
_
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
3/32
Chief Secretaries of States Administrators of Union Territories
(as on 27.2.2015)
Shri I.Y.R. Krishna Rao
Chief Secretary,
Government of Andhra Pradesh,
Secretariat Building,
Hyderabad-500 001.
Tele:-040-23455340
Fax:-040-23453700
Andhra Pradesh
040-23452620
040-23455340
040-23453700
Shri Anjani Kumar Singh
Chief Secretary
Government of Bihar
Old Secretariat
Patna-800 015
Bihar
Tele:-0612-2223804,2215804
Fax:-0612-2222085, 2215085
Shri Ramesh Negi
Chief Secretary
Government of Arunachal Pradesh
Secretariat
Itanagar-791111
Arunachal Pradesh
Tele:-0360-2212595
Fax:- 0360-2215719, 2212475
Shri Vivek Kumar Dhand
Chief Secretary,
Government of Chhattisgarh,
OKS Bhavan, Room No. 207
Mantralaya,
Raipur-492 001
Chhattisgarh
Tele:-0771-2221207
Fax:-0771-2221206
Shri Jitesh Khosla
Chief Secretary
Government of Assam
Block-C 3
rd
Floor
Secretariat, Dispur
Guwahati-781006
Assam
Tele:-0361-2261120
Fax:-0361-2260900
Shri K.K.Sharma
Chief Secretary,
Government of Goa,
Secretariat,
Porvoriam, Goa-403001
Tele:-0832-2419402
Fax:-0832-2415201
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
4/32
S hri O J Pan d ian
Chief Secretary
Government of Gujarat
Block No.1, 3rd floor
New SachivalayaComplex
Gandhinagar-382010
Gujarat
Tele:-079-23220372
Fax:-079-23250305
S hri R ajiv G auba
Chief Secretary
Government of Jharkhand
Secretariat
Ranchi, 834001
Jharkhand
Off:0651-2400240, 0651-2400250
0651-2403255
Shri O epinder S ingh O hesi
Chief Secretary
Government of Haryana
Haryana Civil Secretariat
Chandigarh-160 001
Tele:-0172-2740118
Fax:-0172-2740317
S hri K au sh ik M ukh erjee
Chief Secretary
Government of Karnataka
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore-560001
Karnataka
Tele:-080-22252442
Fax:-080-22258913
S h ri P M itra
Chief Secretary
Government of Himachal Pradesh
Secretariat
Shimla-171001
Himachal Pradesh
Tele:-0177-2621022
Fax:-0177-2621813
S hri J iji T ho m so n
Chief Secretary
Government of Kerala
Secretariat
Thiruvanthapuram.
Kerala
Tele:-0471-2333147,2327376
Fax:-0471-2327176
Shri M oham m ad Iqbal Khandey
Chief Secretary
Government of Jammu
Kashmir
Civil Secretariat
Srinagar-190001
Jammu and Kashmir
Tele:-0194-2455353
Fax:-0194-2452356 (Srinagar)
0191-2546773
0191-2544338(Jammu)
Shri Anthony J C O esa
Chief Secretary
Government of Madhya Pradesh
Vallabh Bhavan
Bhopal-462003
Madhya Pradesh
Tele:-0755-2441848, 2441521
Fax:-0755-2441751
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
5/32
S hri S wadheen S K shatriya
Chief Secretary
Government of Maharashtra
Room No.518, 5
th
Floor
Main Building Mantralaya
Mumbai-400032
Maharashtra
Tele:-022-22025042
Fax:-022-22028594
S h ri C J P o nra j
Chief Secretary
Government of Nagaland
Secretariat
Kohima-797001
Nagaland
Tele:-0370-2270082
Fax:-0370-2270057, 2222137
S h ri P C L aw m k un ga
Chief Secretary
Government of Manipur
Room No.171 South Block
Secretariat
Imphal-795001
Manipur
Tele:-0385-221144
Fax:-0385-2452629
Shri G okul Chandra Pati
Chief Secretary
Government of Orissa
General Admn. Dept.
Orrisa Secretariat
Bhubaneshwar-751001
Orissa
Tele:-0674-2534300
Fax:-0674-2536660
Shri P B W arjri
Chief Secretary
Government of Meghalaya
Main Secretariat Building
Shilong-793001
Meghalaya
Tele:-0364-221144, 2224801
Fax:-0364-2452629, 2225978
S hri S arve sh K au sh al
Chief Secretary,
Government of Punjab,
Punjab Civil Secretariat,
Chandigarh-160001
Punjab
Tele:-0172-2740156
Fax:-0172-2742488
Shri La lma ls awma
Chief Secretary
Government of Mizoram
Civil Secretariat, Block-C
Aizwal-796001
Mizoram
Tele:-0389-2322411
Fax:-0389-2322745,2323467
S h ri C S R a ja n
Chief Secretary
Government of Rajasthan
Secretariat
Jaipur-302005
Rajasthan
Tele:-0141-2227254
Fax:-0141-2227114
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
6/32
Shri Rinchen Ongmu
Chief Secretary
Government of Sikkim
Tashiling Secretariat
Gangtok -737101
Sikkim
Tele:-03592-202315,222315
Fax:-03592-204323, 224323
Shri Alok Ranjan
Chief Secretary,
Government of Uttar Pradesh,
Lal Bahadur Shastri Bhavan,
UPSecretariat,
Lucknow-226001.
Uttar Pradesh
Tele:-0522-2221599
Fax:-0522-2239283
Shri K.Gnanadesikan
Chief Secretary
Government of Tamil Nadu
Secretariat
Chennai-600009
Tamil Nadu
Tele:-044-25671555
Fax:-044-25672304
Dr. Rajiv Sharma
Chief Secretary
Government of Telangana,
Secretariat Building,
Hyderabad-500 001.
Shri G. Kameswara Rao
Chief Secretary
Government of Tripura
Civil Secretariat
Agartala-799001
Tripura
Tele:-0381-2323200
Fax:-0381-2324013
Shri Sanjay Mitra
Chief Secretary
Government of West Bengal
Writers' Building
Kolkata -700001
West Bengal
Tele:-033-22145858
Fax:-033-22144328
ShriN. RaviShanker
Chief Secretary,
Government of Uttarkhand,
Uttarakhand Secretariat,
4BShubhash Road,
Dehradun -248001.
Uttrakhand
Tele:-0135-2712100, 2712094
Fax:-0135-2712500, 2712113
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
7/32
U Ts
Shri Anand Prakash
Chief Secretary
U.T.of Andaman Nicobar Islands
Secretariat
Port Blair, Andaman -744101
Andaman and Nicobar (UT)
Tele:-03192-233110
Fax:-03192-232656
Shri Chetan B Sanghi
Chief Secretary,
Puducherry Administration,
Puducherry -605001.
Puducherry (UT)
0413-2334145
0413-2335512
0413-2337575
Shri Vijay Kumar D ev
Advisor to Administrator
U.T.of Chandigarh
Secretariat, Sector 9
Chandigarh -160001
Tele:-0172-27401542740118
Fax:-0172-27401652740317
Chandigarh (UT)
S hri A shish K un dra
(Administrator)
U .T. of Dadra Nagar Haveli
Secretariat
Silvasa-396230.
Dadra Nagar Haveli
Tele:-0260-2230700 2642777
Fax:-0260-2230775 2230997
Shri
D.M.
Spolia
Chief Secretary
Govt of NCTof Delhi,
Players Building, 'A' Wing,
I.PEstate
New Delhi
Tel: 011-23392100, 23392101
Fax:011-23392102
S hri H R ajesh P ra sa d
Admin istrator
U.T. of Lakshadweep
Secretariat
Kavaratti-682555
Lakshadweep (UT)
Tele:-04896-262255
Fax:-004896-262184
S hri A sh ish K und ra
(Administrator)
U.T.of Daman
Diu
Secretariat
Daman
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
8/32
1
5 5 4 3
I TEMNO. 43
CObRT NO. 8
SECTI ON PI L
SUP REM E C 0 U R T 0 FI N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDI NGS
W i t Pet i t i on( Ci vi l ) - No.309/ 2003
LAXM ~ARAI N MOOI
Pet i t i oner ( s}
VERSUS·
UNI ON OF NDI A ORS. ·
Respondent ( s)
; -
)
( W th appl n. ( st f or p~: f ~si on t o f i l e r ej oi nder af f i davi t ,
di r ect i ons, perms si on t o ~ e addi t i onal af f i davi t , per m ssi on t o
f i l e addi t i onal document s , per i ni ssi onto f i l e submssi on and of f i ce
report)
w. P. ( C) No. 44/ 2004
( Wt h appl n. '( s ) f or di r ect i ons and exempt i on f r omf i l i ng o. T. and
may - r ef er t o r emar ks)
W P. ( C) ~o. 688/ 2007
( Wt h appl n. (5) .f or st ay)
SLP( C) No. 14121/ 2009
( Ref und of cost and· Of f i ce : Report )
Dat e: 06/ 02/ 2015 These mat t ers were cal l ed on f or hear i ng t oday.
CORAM :
HON' BLE MR. J USTi CE MADAN B. LOKUR
HON' BLE
MR.
J USTI CE UDAY UMESH LALI T
For Pet i t i oner ( S)
Mr . Pr anab Kumar Mul i i ck, AOR
Mr s. Soma Mul l i ck, Adv.
Mr . Sebat K' l i r O. areur i a, Adv.
Mr . Raj Panj wani , Sr . Adv.
Ms. Pur ni ma Bhat , AOR
Mr . C. D. Si ngh, AOR
Mr . B. D. Sharma, AOR
i n WP 688/ 07
Ms. , Sakshi Kakkar , Adv.
g . ~
J ,. _
_
. f'.~ ~
fj
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
9/32
i n SLP 14121/ 09
For Respondent ( ~) .
uor
CPCB
2
Mr . Nar ot t am Vyas, Adv.
Mr . S. C. Varma, Adv.
Mr . K. Radhakr i shnan, Sr . Adv.
Ms. Suni ta Sharma, ~dv.
Ms. Ki r an Bhar dwaj , Adv.
Mr . M Khai r at i , Adv.
Mr . D. S. M~hr a, AOR
t;
I
Mr . L. C. Agr awal a, AOR
Ms. C. K. t ' i Suchar i t a AOR
. . - . .~~~
Mr . Vi j ay anj wani , AOR
Ms. Madhur panj wani , Adv.
Mr . V. K. Ver ma, AOR
Mr . Ni khi l Nayyar , AOR
Mr . Ambuj _ Agr awal , Adv.
Mr . Dhananj ay Bai j al , Adv.
Ms; Akanksha, Adv.
Mr . T. M Si ngh, Adv.
Mr . Ranj an Mukher j ee, AOR
Mr . B. V. Bal aram Das, AOR
Mr . Yash Pal Dhi ngr a, AOR
Mr . Kul di p Si ngh, AOR
Mr . Praveen Swar up, AOR
Ms. Sushma Verma, Ad .
Mr . Suvesh Kumar , Adv.
Mr . Lokendr a Kumar , Adv.
Mr . Sanj i v Sen, Sr . Adv.
Mr . Dev J. Roy, Adv.
Mr . Praveen Swar up, Adv.
Mr . Mohi t Kumar Shah, AOR
Ms. G. I ndi r a, AOR
Mr . Pahl ad Si ngh Sharma, AOR
Mr . Ashok K. Sr i vastava, AOR
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
10/32
3
Ms. Praveena Gau~am AOR
Mr . Puni t Dut t Tyagi , AOR
Mr . Tara Chandra Sharma, AOR
Ms. Kam ni J ai swal , AOR·
Mr ~Abhi j a~ P. Medh, AOR
Mr . Sanj aYf : : R.Hegde, AOR
Mr .
Muke~ , ' l r ?K.i r i , AOR
j~: -
Shi bi i hi sh M sr a, AOR
~
;
Mr .
Mr ; Ar un K. Si nha, AOR
Mr . B. S. Bant hi a; AOR
~ .
Mr . Khwai r akpam Nobi n Si ngh, AOR
Mr . T. V. Rat nam AOR
Ms. Sum t a Hazar i ka, AOR
Mr; Mohanprasad Mehar i a; AOR
Mr . Aruneshwar Gupt a, AOR
Mr . Suni l Fer nandes, AOR
Mr . K. R. Sasi pr abhu, AOR
Mr . Raj esh Sr i vast ava, AOR
Mr . T. V. George, AOR
Mr . Anuvrat Sharma, AOR
Mr . Naresh K. Sharma, . AOR
Mr . Aj ay Pal , AOR
Mrs. Mani k Karc: m a' Wal a, AOR
Mr . Abhi j i t sengupt a, AOR
Ms. C. K. suchar i t a, AOR
Mr . pr adeep M sr a, AOR
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
11/32
For St at es of
Andhra Pradesh
Ar unachal Pradesh
Assam
-r
Bi har
Chhat t i sgar h
Goa
Guj ar at
Haryana
H. P.
J K
4
Mr . Sur~ Si ngh, Adv.
Mr . Sam r Al i Khan, AOR
Mr . S. K. Verma, AOR
Ms. A. . Subhashi ni , ~dv.
, ,1
Mr . Gunt ur . .r abhakar , Adv.
Ms. Prernaf S~ngh, Adv.
Mr . Ani l . S}l J : i vast av,AOR
Mr . Ri t u
./~,~j'~
Adv.
J~ ~t
Mr . Navni t Kumar , Adv.
Mr . Ri ku Sarma Adv.
f or is Corpor at e Law Gr oup
Mr . Gopal Si ngh AOR
Mr . Mani sh Kumar , Adv.
Ms. Rashm ~hr i vast ava, Adv.
Mr . Apoor v Kur up, Adv.
Mr . Ani r uddha P. Mayee, Adv.
Mr . V. C. Shukl a, Adv.
Mr . Pawan Shr ee Agr awal , Adv.
Mr . A. Sel vi n Raj a, Adv.
Ms. Char udat t a Mahi ndr akar , Adv.
Mr . Si ddhar t h Bhat nagar ; Adv.
Mr . Si dhar t h Mohan, Adv.
Mr . Rahul Arya, Adv.
Mr . T. Mahi pal , AOR
Ms. Hemant i ka Wahi , AOR
Ms. J esal Wahi , Adv.
Ms. Preet i Bhardwaj , Adv.
Ms. Gi ss Ant ony, Adv.
Mr . Ar un Bhar dwaj , AAG
Mr . Par veen Kumar , Adv.
Ms. B. Var dhan, · Adv.
Mr . Kamal Mohan Gupt a, AOR
Mr . Sur yanar yana Si ngh, AAG
Ms. Pr agat i Neekhr a, AOR
Mr . G. M. Kawasa, Adv.
Mr . A. Suresh, Adv.
Mr . Ashok Mat hur , AOR
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
12/32
. : [ har khand
Karnat aka
Ker al a
Madhya Pr adesh
Maharasht r a
Mani p' Ur
M zoram
Nagal and
Raj ast han
Si kki m
Tam l Nadu
Tel angana
Tr i pur a
ut t ar Pradesh
5
Mr . Gopal Pr asad, AOR
Mr . J ayesh GauraV, Adv.
Mr . V. N. Raghupathy, AOR
Mr . Lagnesh M shr a' , Adv.
Mr . Par i kshi t . Angadi , Adv.
Ms. Bi na M~dhavan, AOR
Mr. Sunnayt ,~houdhar y, Adv.
Mr . M shr a , ~f 1urabh,AOR
Ms.
.~.~;-r
.~;;:
Ani r ¥~a P. Mayea, Adv.
Asha ~~pal an Nai r , Adv.
.
Mr . Sapam Bi swaj i t Mei t ei , Adv.
Mr . Ashok K. ~ ngh, AOR
Mr . Z. H. I saac, ; Hai di ng, Adv.
' Mr . Pragyan Sharma, Adv;
Mr . Heshu Kayi na, Adv.
Mr . P. V. Yogeswar an, AOR
- Mr s. K. Enatol i Sema, Adv;
Mr . Am t Kumar Si ngh, Adv.
Mr . Bai aj i Sr i ni vasan, AOR
Mr . S. S . ' Shci nl sher y,AAG
Mr . Am t Sharma, Adv.
Mr . Sandeep Si ngh, Adv.
Mr . A. Mar i ar put ham AAG
Ms. Ar una Mathur , Adv.
Mr . Yusuf Khan, Adv.
Mr . K. Vi j ay Kumar , Adv.
f or
M s
' Ar putham Ar una Co.
Mr . M l ' ogesh Kanr i a, AOR
Ms. J . J anani , Ad .
Mr . A. Sant ha Kumar an, Adv.
Mr . P. Venkat Reddy, Adv.
Mr . Sumanth Nookal a, Adv.
f or
is
Venkat Pal wai Law Associ at es
Mr . Gopal Si ngh, - AOR
Mr . Ri t ur aj Bi swas, Adv.
Ms. Rashm Shr i vast ava, Adv.
Mr . Gaurav Bhat i a, AAG
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
13/32
6
Mr . I r shad Ahmad, AAG
Mr . M :R . Shams had , AOR
Mr . Raj at Si ngh, Adv.
Mr . Adi t ya Samaddar , Adv.
Mr . Shashank Si ngh, Adv.
A&N I s l ands
Mr . Ashu t osh Kr . Sharma, Adv.
Mr . J . K. Bhat i a, Adv.
Mr . Ani p S~~hthey, AOR
Mr . Mohi t R~ul , Adv.
Mr . SaakaCl , r ardana, Adv ~
.- ~:. ~
.
~t
Mr . K. V . .: / ' Tagdi shvar an,Adv.
Mr s. G. ~ ra, Adv.
Ut t arakhand
West Bengal
Chandi gar h
Mr . Gopal Si ngh, AOR
Ms. Vi m a Si nh~, Adv.
Puducher r y
Mr . V. G. Pragasam . AOR
Mr .
S.J.
Ar i st ot l e, Adv.
Mr . Pr abu Ramasubr amani an, ' Adv.
UPON hear i ng t he counsel t he Cour t made t he f ol l owi ng
O. R D E
R
W P. CC) .No. 330/ 2001 ( Common Cause V. · Uni on of I ndi a)
We haVe hear c\ l ear ned counsel f or t he par t i es.
The pr ayer i n W P. ( C) No. 330 of 2001 [ Common Cause v.
Uni on of I ndi a] i s f pr enf ' or cement of st andards l ai d down
by t he Bur eau of I ndi an st andar ds i n I S 8895: 1978
.r egardi ng the' di sposal of ~ni mal wast ~ and sl ur r y and I S
1982: 1971
r egar di ng
ant e-mort em
and
post - mort em
i nspect i on of meat ani mal s.
The Secr et ar y i n t he M ni st r y of Cons~er Af f ai r s,
Food and Publ i c Di st r i but i on, Gover nment of I ndi . a shoul d
i nf orm Mr . K. Radhakr i shnan, Sr . Advocat e appear i ng f or
Uni on of I ndi a, wi t hi n t hr ee weeks as t o whet her t he
st andar ds t hat have been l ai d down r equi r e any r evi ew or
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
14/32
7
update and/or modification due to the passage of time.
By an order dated
23.08. 2012
this Court had directed
setting up of state Committees for overseeing the
functioning of the' slaughter houses.
The Chairman of
~~_.., , •. ~II
each state committee is \ the Secretary in the Department
. . .. . . . . .
.
--
.
~ ~ ,
-
of Urban Development in tthe State Government.
in
the
Ministry
D.~velppmen,
Government of Iridia,. who.
w~11
coordina.te ·w.i·ththe- state
Co. .itte~s. and obtain ·information from them as reqaired
In the first instance, the Secretary
in the Ministry of UrbanDevelopment,Governmentof India
(the Nodai officer) ill ascertain and state on affidavit
whether all th.. states have set up the conunittee in termS
of the ,.o,' 'derpassed by this court on 2~.08.2012 and
whether they are .functioning in termSof paragraph 4 of
the order dated 27.08.2013.
The.Nodal Officer will also inform us whether the
prevention of Cruelty. to Animills (Slaughter House)Rules,
2000 are being implementedand enforced and whether the
broad frameworkprepared by the Ministry of Envi orunent
and Forests, Governmentef India for the state Co_ittees
for slaughter ,houses
i.~
being followed.
The needful be
done#w.ihin four weeks.
List this matter on
27th
March,
2015.
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
15/32
8
W.P. (C) No. 44/2004 (People for Ethical Treatment of
Animals v. Union of India
Ora.)
Tag with W.P; (C) 'No.330/2001.
Writ Petition (Civil)· No..309/2003 (Laxmi Narain Modi v.
Union of India Ors.) .
.~
~.
The petitioner is s¥d to have passed away.
. .
~
Since the issues r.-4,j.sed·n the petition are similar
'_ ' '.'~~~;,.
.
to the earlier petitH.b, .viz., W.P.(C) No.330 of 2001
[ConunonCause v.. Union of India], we dispose of this writ
..
_
petition.
However,· we grant liberty to the learned counsel
appearing in this petition to make·their submissions in
the petition filed by CommonCause.
Pending. applications, if any, are also disposed of.
Wri.t Petition (Civil) .No.688/2007 (Sushil Kumarv. State
of
c.
P.
Ors.)
This petition pertains to the· slaughter house in
Meerut, Uttar pradesh.
Weare not inclined to· entertain t.his petition. The
petition is accordingly dismissed.
However~
we grant liberty to the petitioner
to
... 1 t to th·e slaughter, house in
agi tate the assuea re a l.ng. .
Meerut before an appropriate forum.
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
16/32
9
SLP C l No.14121 of 2009 (Hansraj, Bhardwaj v. Union of
India 6 Anr;)
We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned
judgment. The special leiave petition is dismissed' .
f.
> .. :
f
~ ~ k
:jf~~.
'
. ,~ (
(JASWI~~R)
COuRT MASTER
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
17/32
ITEM NO.4
COURT NO.12
SECTION PIL
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 309 OF 2003
LAXMI NARAIN MODI
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA ORS.
Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for directions, permission to file rejoinder affidavit,
permission to file additional documents, permission to file additional
affidavit, permission to file submissions and office report)
WITH W.P(C) NO. 330 of 2001
(With appln(s) for directions)
W.P(C) NO. 44 of 2004
(With appln(s) for directions, exemption from filing O.T.)
W.P(C) NO. 688 of 2007
(With appln(s) for stay)
Date: 23/08/2012 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv.
Ms. Purnima Bhat, Adv.
Mr. C.D. Singh, Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
These writ petitions have been preferred in public interest seeking
various directions to the State Governments as well as to the Union of
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
18/32
India, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Animal Welfare Board of
India and other statutory authorities to effectively implement the
provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Establishment and
Registration of Societies for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) Rules, 2000
and also the provisions of Environment Protection Act, 1986, Schedule
I, Entry 50 and also Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules,
2000 etc. Further, direction is also sought to ensure that the animals meant
for slaughter are not transported in violation of Transport of Animals Rule,
1978 and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Transport on Foot) Rules,
2000. Further, prayers have also been made to ensure that the
recognized slaughter houses are in conformity with the provisions of
the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules, 2000 and
also for other consequential reliefs. A detailed affidavit has been
filed by the Central Pollution Control Board (for short CPCB) as
early as in October, 2003 wherein they have categorically stated as
follows:
The CPCB is of the view that the slaughter houses generate
substantial quantities of effluents and solid wastes. These slaughter
houses causes nuisance by way of foul smell due to improper handling. It
is, therefore, necessary that these units should install pollution control
devices so that they can comply with the prescribed standards. Further, it
was stated that the existing slaughter houses need to modernize their
operations with greater emphasis of utilization of waste to reduce
environmental problems and to maintain hygienic conditions. It is also
pointed out that most of the slaughter houses in the country are very old
and operate without basic amenities such as proper flooring, water supply,
ventilation etc., and there is no need to upgrade old slaughter houses on
modern lines. Therefore, the CPBC submitted that all the slaughter houses
in the country should comply with the prescribed standards. The
local municipal agencies and concerned police should ensure that no
illegal slaughtering takes place and also the units conform to the standards
set by the State Pollution Control Boards and Pollution Control
Committees.
This Court has passed various orders alerting the State
Governments to properly implement the various provisions referred to
hereinbefore but still no effective steps have been taken by various States
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
19/32
either to constitute Committees or to see that the slaughter houses are
functioning in accordance with the rules framed. The matters have again
come up for hearing today.
Learned senior counsel appearing for the Ministry of
Environment and Forest (MoEF) brought to our knowledge a
decision taken by the MoEF under the Chairmanship of Secretary,
Ministry of Environment and Forest on 26.04.2012. In the
meeting, the CPCB has presented its status of 15 States whereas
the Ministry of Labour gave a status of 20 States and the action
plan was also discussed.
After examining the matter in depth by the Committee, they found
the necessity of constituting State Committee for slaughter houses to
fulfill the mandatory requirements under the various legislations dealing
with the functioning of the slaughter houses in the country. The
decision of dated 26.04.2012 is extracted hereunder for easy reference:-
1. CPCB will write to all States informing about its guidelines
for slaughter houses. [Action: CPCB)
2. CPCB will also initiate action against all slaughter houses
which are not meeting the norms and implement the
abattoir rules through SPCB. It was discussed that SPCB
even has powers to close slaughter houses under these rules.
[Action: CPCB)
J.States to be requested to constitute State Committee for
SlaughterHousesas follows:
i) Secretary of the Departmentof Urban envelopment of
.,
the State-Chairman.
ii) Rep.Departmentof Health.
iii) Rep.Departmentof Animal Husbandry.
iv) Rep.Departmentof Labour.
v) Food Safety Commissioner representing Central Food
Safety andStandardAuthorityof India.
vi) Rep.StatePollutionControl Board.
vii) Rep.StateAnimalWelfareBoard.
viii) Rep.of State Police
ix) 2 prominentpersonsnominatedby state government.
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
20/32
x) Such other officers and experts as the members may
choose to co-opt.
4. Functions of the State Committee for Slaughter Houses so
constituted may be as following:
i) to identify and prepare a list of all the Slaughter
Houses (S.H.s) located within the local self Govt.
(Municipal Corporations, Panchayats etc.)
ii) to call for reports from the District Magistrate or the Dy.
Commissioner and District Food Safety Inspector as
the case may be on the condition/functioning of the
S.H.s and also on the compliance of the relevant
applicable laws.
iii) to recommend modernization of old slaughter houses
(S.H.s) and to relocate S.H.s which are located within or
in close proximity of a residential area.
iv) to recommend appropriate measures for dealing with
solid waste, water/air pollution and for preventing
cruelty to the animals meant for slaughter.
v) to carry out surprise random inspections of S.H.s
regularlyand to issue directions for compliance of the
recommendationsthat maybe made by it.
vi) to send bi-annual reports on the state S.H.s to the
Central Committee and to refer issues that may
require Central Committee recommendations or
Central Govt. assistance.
vii) to accord final approval for licensing of S.H.S to
LocalSelf Govt.
viii) to identify on an ongoing basis, the unlicensed
slaughter houses in the region, and other
unlicensed,unlawfulestablishmentswhere animals are
being slaughtered,on howsoever a small scale, and
take the help of the District Magistrateand other law
enforcement agencies to crackdownon the same.
viii) To checkfor child labour.
[Action:AWD)
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
21/32
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners also pointed out the
necessity of including the Secretary, Local Self Government as well as
the Secretary, Panchayat Raj also as Committee Members for effective
implementation of the various legislations.
Further, it was also pointed out that even though the decision
was taken by the MoEF on 26.04.2012 the same was forwarded to
various State Governments only on 2.7.2012 and so far no effective steps
have been taken by the State Governments to constitute the Committee
and to take further follow up action. The functions to be discharged by
such Committees have also been dealt with in the meeting held on
26.04.2012 for proper implementation. The early constitution of the
committees is, therefore, highly necessary for proper and speedy
implementation of the rules under the various enactments.
In such circumstances, we are inclined to give direction to all the
State Governments and the Union Territories to constitute the State
Committees for slaughters houses, as decided in the meeting held on
26.04.2012, including the Secretary, Local Self Government as well as
Secretary, Panchayat Raj as Members of the Committee over and
above the Members already mentioned.
Since the matter is pending in this Court for a number of years,
we are inclined to give directions to the State Governments and the
Union Territories to constitute the Committees within a period of one
month and report compliance.
Further, we also direct CPCB to write to all the State
Governments informing about the guidelines for slaughter houses as well
as to initiate action against all slaughter houses which are not meeting the
norms and implement the abattoir rules through State Pollution Control
Board (SPCB).
The CPCB will initiate steps within a period of two weeks from
today. The CPCB is also directed to submit its report within a period of
one month.
List the matters after six weeks on a non-miscellaneous day.
I(NARENDRA PRASAD)I
I(RENUKA SADANA)I
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
22/32
REPORTABLE
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF I NDI A
CI VI L ORI GI NAL J URI SDI CTI ON
WRI T PETI TI ON ( C) No. 309 of 2003
Laxm Narai n Modi
. . . . Pet i t i oner
Versus
Uni on of I ndi a and ot her s
. . . . Respondent s
o
R D E R
K. S. Radhakr i shnan, J .
1. We have passed a det ai l ed or der on 9. 7. 2013 expr essi ng t he
appr ehensi on as t o whet her t he Comm t t ees const i t ut ed, f ol l ow ng our
ear l i er or der dat ed 23. 8. 2012, ar e ef f ect i vel y f unct i oni ng and whet her
proper s t eps are bei ng t aken f or pr oper i mpl ement at i on of t he pr ovi si ons of
t he var i ous l egi sl at i ons whi ch have been passed, w t h r egar d t o t he
tr ansport at i on of ani mal s , mai nt ai ni ng of sl aught er houses, ef f l uent and
sol i d wast e di sposal et c.
2. Vi de our or der dat ed 9. 7. 2013, we had di r ect ed al l t he St at e
Gover nment s/ Uni on Ter r i t or i es t o f i l e t hei r act i on t aken r epor t s w t hi n one
month. Few of t he St at es have f i l ed t he act i on t aken r epor t s det ai l i ng t he
f unct i oni ng of t he Commt tees const i t uted. We al so di r ect ed t he MoEF t o
f i nal i ze t he gui del i nes f or t he ef f ect i ve and pr oper f unct i oni ng of t he
State Commt tees f or over s eei ng t he f unct i oni ng of t he sl aught er houses.
I n obedi ence t o our di r ect i on, t he MoEF, on 27. 8. 2013, f i l ed a compl i ance
repor t encl os i ng the broad f ramework t o be f ol l owed by the State Commt tees
f or ef f ect i ve superv i si on of t he sl aught er houses and al so w t h r egar d t o
the t r anspor ta t i on of ani mal s, l oadi ng and unl oadi ng, ef f l uent di sposal ,
sol i d wast e di sposal and al so w t h r egar d t o t he per i odi cal i nspect i on of
s l aughter houses by the respect i ve St at e Ani mal Wel f ar e Boards.
3. We r ei t er at e t he i mpor t ance of pr oper i mpl ement at i on of t he
provi si ons of t he Pr event i on of Cruel t y t o Ani mal s ( Establ i shment and
Regi s t rat i on of Soci et i es f or Pr event i on of Cr uel t y t o Ani mal s ) Rul es,
2000, t he Envi r onment Protecti on Act , 1986, t he Sol i d Wast es ( Management
and Handl i ng) Rul es, 2000 and t he Pr event i on of Cr uel t y t o Ani mal s
( Sl aught er House) Rul es , 2000. Over and above, i t i s al so of ext r eme
i mpor t ance that al l t he Stat e Gover nment s, t he St at e Ani mal Wel f ar e Boards,
Pol l ut i on Contr ol Boar d et c. shoul d scr upul ousl y f ol l ow t he gui del i nes
i ssued by t he MoEF, i n obedi ence t o t he di rect i on gi ven by t hi s Cour t on
10. 10. 2012. The gui del i nes ar e ext r acted herei nbel ow f or easy r ef er ence:
GUI DELI NES FOR TRANSPORTATI ON OF ANI MALS AND SLAUGHTER HOUSES
RESPONSI BI LI TI ES OF ANI MAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT
Any l i ves tock whi ch are pr ocur ed f r om t he mar ket are t o be cer t i f i ed by a
Vet er i nary Surgeon f or i ssui ng a f i t ness cer t i f i cat e i n t he f orm speci f i ed
by t he Cent r al Gover nment f or t he pur pose of t r anspor ta t i on.
The l oadi ng and unl oadi ng of t he ani mal s i n t he mar ket pl ace and bef or e
transportat i on shal l be super vi sed by t he concerned of f i ci al s of t he Ani mal
Husbandr y Depar tment t o ensur e t hat t he ani mal s ar e not subj ect ed t o
unnecessary pai n or suf f er i ng.
I n addi t i on t o t he above heal t h cer t i f i cat e a cer t i f i cat e has t o be
i ssued as per t he Rul e 96 of t he Tr anspor t of Ani mal s ( Amendment ) Rul es,
2001 by the Of f i cer of t he Ani mal Husbandry Depar tment not bel ow t he r ank
of As si s t ant Di r ect or / Deputy Di rect or / Chi ef veter i nar y Of f i cer .
The Ani mal Husbandry aut hor i t y shal l ensur e t hat al l ani mal s ar e pr ovi ded
w th shade, shel t er , f ood and wat er as necessary and t hey ar e t et her ed
secur el y i n a way whi ch does not cause unnecessar y di scom or t t o ani mal s.
The Ani mal Husbandr y Depar tment shal l ensur e t hat t he si ck, l ame, i nj ur ed
and pregnant ani mal s ar e not t r anspor ted f or Sl aught er .
They shoul d al so ensure that t he ani mal s ar e never l i f t ed or
head, hor ns, ear s, f eet , t ai l or any other par t of t he Body
cause unnecessary suf f er i ng.
dragged by
whi ch m ght
http://courtnic nic inls upremecourtltemp/3 092003 3 27820 13p txt
Page 1 of 11
24 02 2015
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
23/32
DOCUMENTATI ON BY DI FFERENT AUTHORI TI ES
I t shoul d be ensur ed t hat each consi gnment shal l bear a
bol d r ed l et t er s t he name, addr ess and t el ephone number
consi gnor and consi gnee, t he number and t ypes of cat t l e
and quant i t y of r at i ons and f ood pr ovi ded.
l abel show ng i n
( i f any) of t he
bei ng t r anspor t ed
The consi gnor shal l be i nf ormed about t he t r ai n or vehi cl e i n whi ch t he
consi gnment of cat t l e i s bei ng sent and i t s ar ri val t i me i n advance.
The consi gnment of cat t l e shal l be booked by t he next t r ai n or vehi cl e
and shal l not be det ai ned af t er t he consi gnment i s accept ed f or booki ng.
GUI DELI NES TO BE FOLLOWED BY THE AUTHORI TI ES FOR TRANSPORTATI ON OF
DI FFERENT ANI MALS (CATTLE, SHEEP AND GOAT, PI G) THROUGH RAI L OR RAOD.
The aver age space pr ovi ded per cat tl e i n Rai l way wagon or vehi cl e shal l
not be l ess t han t ~ O squar e met r es.
Sui tabl e r ope and pl at f orms shoul d be used f or l oadi ng cat t l e f r om
vehi cl es.
I n case of r ai l way wagon t he dr opped door of t he wagon may be used as a
r amp when l oadi ng or unl oadi ng i s done t o t he pl at f or m
Cat t l e shal l be l oaded af t er t hey ar e pr oper l y f ed and gi ven wat er .
Wat er i ng ar rangement s on r out e shal l be made and suf f i ci ent quant i t i es of
wat er shal l be car r i ed f or emer gency.
Suf f i ci ent f eed and f odder w t h adequat e r eser ve shal l be car r i ed t o l ast
dur i ng t he j our ney.
Adequat e vent i l at i on shal l be ensur ed.
Emer gency / f i r st - ai d equi pment i s car r i ed.
Vehi cl e shoul d have sui tabl e r amps and pl at f orms f or l oadi ng and
unl oadi ng.
Ther e shoul d be suf f i ci ent beddi ng on t he f l oor of t he vehi cl e.
Vehi cl e br east bar s shoul d be pr oper l y pl aced.
Vehi cl es ar e mai nt ai ned so as not t o cause i nj ur y, pai n or suf f er i ng.
Vehi cl e i s cl ear l y i dent i f i ed as an ani mal car ri er .
Ther e i s a per manent i ndi c at i on of t he maxi mum ani mal / vehi c l e l oad.
The l at est amended space al l owance f or t ranspor ti ng t he cat t l e by r ai l or
vehi cl e i s gi ven i n t he Tabl e I & I I gi ven bel ow:
I Cat t l e wei ghi ng upt o 200 Kg.
I Cat t l e wei gh- i ng 200- 300 Kg.
I Cat t l e wei ghi ng 300- 400 Kg.
I Cat t l e wei ghi ng above 400 Kg.
11 Squar e Met er ( Sq. Mt r . )
11. 20 Squar e Met er I
11. 40 Square Meter I
12. 0 Square Meter - I
http:/ /courtnic nic inlsupremecourtl temp/3092003 32 7820 13p txt
Page 2 of 11
24 02 2015
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
24/32
Page 3 o f 11
TABLE - I I
Space requi rement for Cat t l e whi l e bei ng t r anspor t ed i n commonl y s i zed
r oad vehi cl es
I Number of Cat t l e
I Vehi cl e Si zel Fl oor Ar eal Cat t l e I Cat t l e I Cat t l e I Cat t l e I
I Lengt h x l of Vehi cl el wei ghi ng I wei ghi ng I wei ghi ng Iwei ghi ng I
I Wdth Squarel i n Square l upto 200 kg1200-300 Kg 1300- 400 Kg l above 4rOO Kgl
I Met er I Met er ( Sq. I ( 1 Sq. m cl ( 1. 20 Sq. I ( 1. 40 Sq. I ( 2. 0 Sq.
rnt
r ; ]
I I m r . ) I Space per I m r space I m r . Space I Space per I
I I I cat t l e) [per cat t l e) [pe r cat t l e) I cat t l e) I
16. 9 x 2. 4 116. 56 116 114 112 18 I
15. 6 x 2. 3 112. 88 112 110 18 16 I
14. 16
x
1.9 17. 904 18 16 16 14 I
12. 9
x
1. 89 15. 481 15 14 14 12 I
GUI DELI NES FOR TRANSPORT OF SHEEP AND GOATS BY RAI L OR ROAD I NVOLVI NG
J OURNEYS OF MORE THAN SI X HOURS
Sheep and goat s shal l be t ra~spor ted separ at el y; but i f l ot s ar e
smal l speci al par t i t i on shal l be pr ovi ded to separate them
Rams and mal e young s tock shal l not be m xed w t h f emal e st ock i n t he
same compart ment .
Suf f i ci ent f ood and f odder shal l be car r i ed t o l ast dur i ng t he j our ney
and water i ng f aci l i t y shal l be pr ovi ded at r egul ar i nt er val s.
Materi al f or paddi ng, such as st r aw, shal l be pl aced on t he f l oor t o
avoi d i nj ur y i f an ani mal l i es down, and t hi s shal l be not l ess t han 5 cm
t hi ck.
PRECAUTI ONS TO BE TAKEN WHI LE TRANSPORTI NG SHEEP AND GOATS
The ani mal s shal l not be f et t er ed unl ess t her e i s a r i sk of t hei r
j umpi ng out and t hei r l egs shal l not be t i ed down.
Adequate vent i l at i on shal l be pr ovi ded i n every wagon. Upper door
si de of wagon shal l be kept open and pr oper l y f i xed and t he upper
t he wagon shal l have w r e gauge cl osel y wel ded mesh ar r angement s t o
bur ni ng ci nder s f r om the engi nes ent er i ng t he wagon and l eadi ng
breakout .
of one
door of
prevent
t o f i r e
The space r equi r ed f or a goat shal l be t he same as t hat f or a wool l ed
sheep and the approxi mate space requi red for a sheep i n a goods vehi cl e or
a r ai l way wagon i s prescr i bed i n the Rul es.
Goods vehi cl es of capaci t y of 5 or 4; t ons, whi ch ar e gener al l y used f or
t r anspor t i ng ani mal s, s hal l car r y not more than f or t y sheep or goat s.
I n t he case of l ar ge goods vehi cl es and
pr ovi ded at ever y t wo or t hr ee met er s acr oss
crowdi ng and tr appi ng of sheep and goats .
wagons , par t i t i ons shal l
t he w dt h t o pr event
be
t he
I n t he case of ewes, goat s or l ambs or ki ds under si x weeks of age,
separate panel s shal l be provi ded.
Note: t he l at est space al l owance requi red f or t r anspor t at i on of sheep and
goat s i s gi ven bel ow:
I Wool ed
I 0. 17
10. 19
Shorn
0. 16
0. 18
Met er l
I
I
I
I
I Appr oxi mate wei ght of ani mal s i n
IKi l ogr am
I
I Not more than 20
I Mor e t han 20 but not mor e t han 25
I Space requi red i n Squar e
http://courtnic ni c inlsupremecourtltemp/309200332782013p txt
24 0 2 2015
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
25/32
Page 4 of 11
I Mor e t han 25 but not mor e t han 30
I Mor e t han 30 but not mor e t han 40
I More than 40
10. 23
10. 27
10. 32
0. 22
0. 25
0. 29
GUI DELI NES FOR TRANSPORT OF PI GS BY RAI L OR ROAD PI GS I NCLUDES PI GLETS,
HOGS, HOGLETS AND ANI MALS OF PI GS FAM LY I NVOLVI NG J OURNEY MORE THAN SI X
HOURS
MANDATORY REQUI REMENTS
A val i d heal t h cer t i f i cat e by a vet er i nar y doct or t o t he ef f ect t hat t he
pi gs ar e i n a f i t condi t i on t o t ravel by r ai l or r oad and ar e not suf f er i ng
f r om i nf ect i ous or cont agi ous or par asi t i c di sease shal l accompany each
consi gnment i n t he t ranspor t of pi gs by r ai l or r oad.
I n addi t i on t o t he above heal t h cer t i f i cat e a cer t i f i cat e has t o be
i ssued as per t he Rul e 96 of t he Tr anspor t of Ani mal s ( Amendment ) Rul es,
2001 by t he of f i cer of t he Ani mal Husbandr y Depar tment not bel ow t he r ank
of Assi s tant Di rector / Deput y Di r ector ; Chi ef Veter i nary Of f i cer .
I n t he absence of a cer t i f i cat e under sub- r ul e ( 1) , t he car r i er shal l
ref use to accept the cons i gnment for t r anspor t .
The cer t i f i cat e under sub r ul e ( 1) shal l be i n a f orm speci f i ed i n
Schedul e-K.
GUI DELI NES FOR CONSI GNOR AND CONSI NEE
Each consi gnment shal l bear a l abel show ng i n bol d r ed l et t er s t he name,
addr ess and t el ephone number ( i f any) of t he consi gnor and consi gnee, t he
number and t ype of pi gs bei ng t r anspor t ed and quant i t y of r at i ons and f ood
provi ded to them
The cons i gnee shal l be i nf or med i n advance about t he t r ai n or vehi cl e i n
whi ch t he consi gnment of pi gs i s bei ng sent and i t s ar r i val t i me.
The consi gnment of pi gs shal l be booked by t he next t r ai n or vehi cl e and
shal l not be detai ned af t er the cons i gnment i s accepted f or booki ng.
Fi r s t - ai d equi pment shal l accompany the pi gs.
Sui t abl e r amps shal l be pr ovi ded f or l oadi ng and unl oadi ng the pi gs .
I n t he case of a r ai l way wagon, when the l oadi ng or unl oadi ng i s done on
t he pl at f orm the dropped door of t he wagon shal l be used as a r amp.
NECESSARY PRECAUTI ONS TO BE FOLLOWED
Whi l e t r anspor t i ng gr oup of pi gs by r ai l or r oad, mal e young st ock shal l
not be m xed w t h f emal e st ock i n t he same compart ment .
Whi l e t ranspor t i ng pi gs by r ai l or r oad, suf f i ci ent f ood and f odder shal l
be car r i ed t o l ast dur i ng t he j our ney and wat er i ng f aci l i t y shal l be
provi ded at r egul ar i nterval s.
Whi l e t r anspor t i ng pi gs by r ai l or r oad, mat er i al s f or paddi ng, such as
st r aw, shal l be pl aced on t he f l oor t o avoi d i nj ur y i f an ani mal l i es down,
and t hi s shal l be not l ess t han 5 cmt hi ck.
Whi l e t r anspor t i ng pi gs by r ai l or r oad, t he ani mal s shal l not be
f et t er ed unl ess t her e i s a r i sk of t hei r j umpi ng out and t hei r l egs shal l
http://courtnic n ic inl supremecourt/ temp/3 092003 3 2 782013 p txt
24 02 2015
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
26/32
not be t i ed down.
SPACE RE QUI RE ME NT DURI NG RAI L TRAVEL - I N TRANSPORT OF PI GS BY RAI L
No r ai l way wagon s hal l accommodat e mor e t han t he number of pi gs as
s pec i f i ed i n t he Tabl e bel ow:
I Br o ad gauge I Met e r gauge I Nar r ow gauge
I ( 1)
I ( 2)
I ( 3)
I Area
of wagonl Ar ea
of wago nl Ar e a
of Wagonl A r ea of
I
I
I
I
I Wagon
I
I Less
th an 121. 1
Squar e I Les s t han
112. 5 Squar e
I
121. 1
Square
I Met r e and
112. 5 Squar e
I Met r e and
I
I Me t r e
Iabove
I Met r e I above
I No t
a l l owed
I Number of
I Number of
I Number of
I Number o f
I
I P i gs 35
I P i gs
50
I P i gs 25
I P i gs 30
I
Adequat e vent i l at i o n s hal l be pr ov i ded i n ever y wagon and
of one s i de of wagon s hal l be kept open and pr oper l y f i xed
door of t he wagon s hal l have wi r e gauge c l os el y wel ded mes h
pr event bur ni ng c i nder s f r om t he engi nes ent er i ng t he wagon
f i r e br eakout .
t he upper door
and t he upper
ar r angement s t o
and l ea di ng t o
SPACE RE QUI RE ME NT DURI NG R OAD TRAVE L - I N TRANSPORAT OF PI GS BY ROAD
Goods vehi c l es of capac i t y of 5 or 4. 5 t ons , whi c h ar e gener al l y us ed
f or t r ans por t at i o n of ani mal s , s hal l car r y not mor e t han t went y pi gs .
I n t he cas e of l ar ge goods vehi c l es and cont ai ner s, par t i t i on s hal l be
p rov i ded at ever y t wo or t hr ee met r es ac r os s t he wi dt h t o pr event t he
c r owdi ng and t r a ppi ng of p i gs .
I n t he cas e
of
pi gs
under
s i x
weeks
of
age,
sepa ra t e
panel s
s h al l
be
p ro v i d ed.
Not e:
The
l at es t updat e
on number
of pi gs
wh i ch
can
be
t r a n s p o r t e d
t h rough r ai l i s gi v en bel ow:
I B r o ad Gauge
( 1)
I Ar ea of Wagon
I VPU hav i ng F l oor Ar ea
63. 55
Squar e Met e r
I Number o f
P i g s
104
( 0. 61
Squar e Met er per
P i g )
( 2) The l a t e s t updat e on number of pi g s wh i ch can be t r a n s p o r t e d
t hr ough vehi c l e
i s
g i v en
bel ow:
Is. No.
I
I
11.
12.
13 .
I Maxi mum numbe r of Pi g s per m t t ed f or Road Vehi c l es
I Ve hi c l e IVehi c l e IVehi c l e IVehi c l e I
I havi ng s i z el hav i ng s i z el havi ng s i z el hav i ng s i z e I
15 . 6m x 15. 15 m x 13. 03mx 12. 9m x 2. 0 m I
12. 35m 12. 18 m 12. 18 m I I
143 137 122 119 I
131 126 115 113 I
121 118 110 19 I
I Ty pe o f
IAni mal
I
I Weane r
IYoung
I Adul t
Not e: - For t he pur pos e of P i gs of al l br eeds , ages and s ex, t he f ol l owi ng
Space al l owances shal l app l y:
Weane r - pi gl et whi ch has j us t been s epar at e f r om t he mot her f or t he
pur pos e of i ndependent r e ar i ng and c ommonl y i n t he wei ght r ange of 12 kg
15 kg.
http://courtnic nic inlsupremecourtltemp/3092003 3 27 820 1 3p txt
Page 5 of 11
24 02 2015
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
27/32
Young - Mal e or f emal e pi g bet ween 0. 3 t o 0. 6 months of age and commonl y
i n t he wei ght r ange of 15 Kg - 50 Kg.
Adul t - A mal e or f emal e pi g above 06 months of age and havi ng wei gh more
t han 50 Kg.
SPECI FI CATI N TO BE FOLLOWED FOR UNLOADI NG AND TI LL THE ANI MALS ARE
SUBJ ECT TO SLAUGHTER
The r ecept i on ar ea of sl aught er house shal l have proper r amps f or di r ect
unl oadi ng of ani mal s f r om vehi c l es or r ai l way wagons and t he sai d r ecept i on
ar ea shal l have adequat e f aci l i t y suf f i ci ent f or f eedi ng and wat er i ng of
ani mal s.
The unl oadi ng of ani mal s shoul d be super vi sed by t he ani mal husbandr y
aut hor i t i es.
Separ at e i sol at i on pens shal l be provi ded i n sl aught er house w t h
wat er i ng and f eedi ng ar r angement s f or ani mal s suspect ed t o be suf f er i ng
f rom contagi ous and i nf ect i ous di seases, and f r act i ous ani mal s, i n or der t o
segr egat e t hem f rom t he
Ant e- mor t em and pen ar ea on sl aught er house shal l be paved r emai ni ng
ani mal s.
Adequate hol di ng ar ea shal l be pr ovi ded i n sl aught er house accor di ng t o
t he cl ass of ani mal s t o be sl aught ered and t he sai d hol di ng ar ea shal l have
wat er and f eedi ng f aci l i t i es.
The r est i ng gr ounds i n sl aught er house shal l have over head pr ot ect i ve
shel t er sw t h i mper vi ous materi al such as concr et e non- s l i pper y herr i ng- bone
t ype sui t abl e t o st and wear and t ear by hooves, or br i ck, and pi t ched t o
sui t abl e dr ai nage f aci l i t i es and t he curbs of sai d i mper vi ous mat er i al 150
t o 300 mm hi gh shal l be pr ovi ded ar ound t he borders of l i vestock pen area,
except at t he ent r ances and such pen shal l pr ef er abl y be covered.
Ever y ani mal af t er i t has been subj ect ed t o vet er i nar y i nspect i on shal l
be passed on t o a l ai r age f or r est i ng f or 24 hour s bef or e sl aught er .
The l ai r age of t he sl aught er house shal l be adequat e i n si ze suf f i ci ent
f or t he number of ani mal s t o be l ai red.
The space pr ovi ded i n t he pens of such l ai r age shal l be not l ess t han 2. 8
sq. m . per l ar ge ani mal and 1. 6 sq. m . per smal l ani mal .
The ani mal s shal l be kept i n such l ai r age separ at el y dependi ng upon t hei r
t ype and cl ass and such l ai r age shal l be so const r uct ed as t o pr ot ect t he
ani mal s f r om heat , col d and r ai n.
The l ai r age shal l have adequat e f aci l i t i es f or wat er i ng and post - mortem
i nspect i on.
Feedi ng and wat er i ng ar rangement s i n t he Ani mal Hol di ng ar ea shoul d be
made avai l abl e.
Whet her ante and post mor t em examnat i on by a qual i f i ed vet er i nar i an i s
bei ng car r i ed out .
Ani mal s not t o be sl aught er ed except i n r ecogni zed or l i censed houses.
No per son shal l sl aught er any ani mal w t hi n a muni ci pal ar ea except i n a
sl aught er house r ecogni zed or l i censed by t he concerned author i t y empower ed
http :/ /courtn ic n ic inl supremecourtl temp/3 092003 32782013 p tx t
Page 6 of 11
24 02 2015
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
28/32
Page 7 of 11
under t he l aw f or t he t i me bei ng i n f or ce t o do so.
NO ani mal whi ch i s pr egnant , or has an of f s pr i ng l ess t han t hr ee months
ol d, or i s under t he age of t hr ee mont hs or has not been cer t i f i ed by a
vet er i nar y doct or t hat i t i s i n a f i t cci ndi t i onto be s l aughtered, shal l be
sl aught ered.
The sl aught er house shal l have a r ecept i on ar ea of adequat e si ze
suf f i ci ent f or l i ves t ock subj ect t o veter i nary i nspect i on.
The vet er i nar y doct or shal l exam ne t hor oughl y not mor e t han 12 ani mal s
i n an hour and not mor e t han 96 ani mal s i n a day.
METHOD OF SLAUGHTER OF ANI MAL AND PROCEDURE
No ani mal shal l be sl aught er ed i n a sl aught er house i n si ght of ot her
ani mal s.
No ani mal shal l be admni stered any chemcal , dr ug or hormone bef or e
sl aught er except dr ug f or i t s t r eat ment f or any speci f i c di sease or
ai l ment .
The sl aught er hal l s i n a sl aught er house shal l
sect i ons of adequat e di mensi ons suf f i ci ent f or
i ndi vi dual ani mal s t o ensur e t hat t he ani mal s t o be
not w t hi n t he sl i ght of ot her ani mal s.
provi de separate
sl aught er of
sl aught er ed i s
Knocki ng sect i on i n sl aught er house may be so pl anned as t o sui t t he
ani mal and par t i cul ar l y t he r i t ual sl aught er , i f any and such
knocki ng sect i on and dr y l andi ng ar ea associ at ed w t h i t shal l be so
bui l t t hat escape f r om t hi s sect i on can be easi l y car r i ed out by an
oper at or w t hout al l ow ng t he ani mal t o pass t he escape bar r i er .
BROAD FRAMEWORK UNDER ENVI RONMENT ( PROTECTI ON) ACT 1986 AND RULES FRAMED
THEREUNDER:
Ef f l uent Di sposal :
The af f l uent di s posal st andar ds not i f i ed under t he
(Protect i on) Rul es, 1986 ar e:
Envi r onment
ICategory
IParameters
IConcent r ati on
l i n not t o I
l exceed, mg/ l I
I I
1100 I
1100 I
110 I
1500 I
I I
130 I
150 I
110 I
I Sl aught er House
I Above 70 TLWK/day
I
I
170 TLWK/ day and bel ow
l B. Meat Processi ng
I
I
I
I
I
I
I BOD (3 days at 27: C)
I Suspended Sol i ds
10i l and Grease
I BOD (3 days at 27:C)
I BOD 3 days at 27: C)
I Suspended Sol i d
10i l and Grease
Not e: ( i ) TLWK - Tonnes of Li ve Wei ght Ki l l ed: ( i i ) I n case of di sposal
i nt o muni ci pal sewer wher e sewage i s t r eat ed, t he i ndust r i es shal l
i nst al l scr een and oi l & grease separat i on uni t s: ( i i i ) The i ndust r i es
havi ng sl aught er house al ong w t h meat pr ocessi ng uni t s w l l be
consi dered i n meat processi ng category as fa r as s tandards are concerned.
The Pol l ut i on Cont r ol Board may speci f y more s t r i ngent s tandards f r omt he
above dependi ng upon the qual i t y requi rement of reci pi ent sys tem
Sol i d waste di sposal :
http://courtnic nic inlsupremecourtltemp/3 092003 3 2 782013 p txt
24 0 2 2015
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
29/32
Page 8 o f 11
As per t he Muni ci pal Sol i d Waste ( Management and Handl i ng) Rul es, 2000,
the was tes f roms l aughter house, meat and f i sh mar ket s, f r ui t s and
vegetabl es markets , whi ch are bi odegradabl e i n nature, shal l be managed
to make use of such was tes .
I NSPECTI ON OF SLAUGHTER HOUSE: ( 1) The Ani mal s Wel f are Board of I ndi a or
a Stat e Ani mal s Wel f are Board or any per son who i s qual i f i ed veter i nar i an
i s aut hor i zed by Ani mal Wel f ar e Boar d of I ndi a may at l east once i n ever y
si x mont hs per i od, i nspect any sl aught er house w t hout not i ce t o i t s
owner or t he person i n- charge of i t at any t i me dur i ng t he wor ki ng hours
t o ensur e t hat t he pr ovi si ons of t hese r ul es ar e bei ng compl i ed w t h.
(2) The person or the Ani mal Wel f are Organi zat i on author i zed under sub
r ul e ( 1) shal l af t er i nspect i on send i t s r epor t t o Ani mal Wel f ar e Boar d
of I ndi a as wel l as t o t he muni ci pal or l ocal aut hor i t y f or appr opr i at e
act i on i ncl udi ng i ni t i at i on of l egal pr oceedi ngs, i f any, i n t he event of
vi ol at i on of any pr ovi si ons of t hese r ul es.
~ We di r ect al l t he St at e Gover nment s/ UTs and t he Comm tt ees
consti t ut ed t o ef f ect i vel y f ol l ow the above-ment i oned gui del i nes. For
gi vi ng f ur t her di r ecti ons, i ni t i al l y we ar e i ncl i ned t o di r ect t he St at es
of Taml Nadu, Kar nat aka, Keral a, Del hi , Mahar asht r a and Ut t ar Pr adesh t o
i mpl ement t he pr ovi si ons of t he Act ment i oned ear l i er as wel l as t he
gui del i nes i ssued by t he MoEF, and f i l e an act i on t aken r epor t w t hi n t hr ee
mont hs. Pos t af t er t hr ee mont hs al ong w t h t he Act i on Taken Repor ts.
Communi cat e t he or der t o t he Chi ef Secr et ar i es of t he above- ment i oned
St ates.
J
( K. s. RADHAKRI SHNAN)
.......................................
. ,J.
( PI NAKI CHANDRA GHOSE)
New Del hi ,
August 27, 2013
SUP REM E
COURT NO. 8
C 0 U R T
REVI SED
SECTI ON PI L
I TEMNO. 301
o
F
I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDI NGS
WRI T PETI TI ON (CI VI L) NO( s) . 309 OF 2003
LAXM NARAI N MODI
Pet i t i oner( s)
VERSUS
UNI ON OF I NDI A & ORS.
Respondent ( s)
(W t h appl n( s) f or permssi on t o f i l e r ej oi nder af f i davi t , di r ecti ons,
perm ssi on t o f i l e addl . af f i davi t , documents and submss i ons w th
of f i ce repor t )
WTH WP(C) NO. 330 of 2001
( W t h appl n. f or di r ecti ons)
W P( C) NO. 688 of 2007
(W th appl n. f or st ay)
WP(C) NO.
of 2004
(W th appl n. f or exempt i on f r om f i l i ng O. T. and di rect i ons)
SLP(C) NO. 14121 of 2009
(W t h appl n. f or di r ect i ons, r ef und of cost s and of f i ce r epor t )
Date : 27/ 08/ 2013 These Pet i t i ons wer e cal l ed on f or hear i ng t oday.
CORAM
HON' BLE MR. J USTI CE K. S. RADHAKRI SHNAN
HON' BLE
MR
J USTI CE PI NAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
Counsel f or t he par t i es
Mr
Pranab Kumar Mul l i ck, Adv.
Ms. Soma Mu11i ck, Adv.
http://courtnic nic inlsupremecourtltemp/3 092003 3 2 782013 p txt
24 0 2 2015
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
30/32
Mr . Ra j
Panj wa ni ,
Sr . Adv.
Ms .
Pur n i ma
Bhat
Kak,
Adv.
Mr .
Vi j ay
Panj wan i ,
Adv .
Mr .
R ak es h Kha nna,
ASG
Mr .
Adi t ya Si ngh,
Adv.
Ms . Ki r a n
Bha rdwa j ,
Adv.
f or Mr .
S. N. Ter dal , Adv.
Mr .
D. S. Chadha,
Adv .
Mr .
P r a dh uman Go hi l ,
Adv.
Mr .
Vi k as h S i n gh,
Adv.
2
Ms .
Bi na Madhavan,
Adv.
Mr . Ani p Sa cht he y, Adv.
Mr . Sa ak aar Sa r dana , Adv .
Mr . M. Yoges h Kanna, Adv.
Mr . A. Sant h a Kumar an, Adv.
Ms . Sas i Kal a, Adv.
Mr . Ani r u ddha P . May ee, Adv .
Mr . Char u da t t a Mahi n dr a ka r , Adv.
Mr . Mi s hr a Saur a bh, Adv.
Ms . As ha G. Nai r , Adv.
Mr . Chet a n Chawl a, Adv.
Mr . Sur y a na r a ya na Si ngh, Adv.
f o r Ms . P r agat i Neek hr a , Adv.
Ms . Ar u na Mat hu r ,
Adv.
Mr . Yus uf Khan, Adv.
Ms . Ni s hi Shar ma, Adv.
f or
Mis
Ar put ham Ar una
Co.
Mr . Gopal P r a s ad, Adv .
Mr . J ayes h Gaur a v, Adv.
Ms .
Vi bha
Dat t a Mak hi j a, Adv.
Mr . M. P. Si ngh, Adv.
Mr . Sun i l Fer nandes , Adv.
Ms . I n s ha Mi r , Adv.
Ms . As t ha Shar ma, Adv.
Mr . Mandeep Vi na ya k, Adv .
Ms . Anj al i Shar ma, Adv.
Ms . P r a ve ena Ga ut am Adv .
DAH, Goa Mr . Bhavani s hankar V. Gadni s , Adv.
Ms . Suni t a B. Rao, Adv. ( NP)
Mr . B. D. Shar ma, Adv.
Mr . N. Vyas , Adv.
Ms . Deep Shi k ha Bhar a t i , Adv .
Mr . Ved P. Ar ya, Adv.
Mr . S. C. Ver ma, Adv.
3
Mr . Sanc har Anand, AAG
Mr . Kr i s hna Sar ma, Adv.
Mr . Ri k u Shar ma, Adv.
Mr . Mo ha n P r a s ad Gupt a , Adv .
Ms . Suni t a Shar ma
Mr . M. Khai r a t i , Adv.
Mr . Vi kas Mal hot r a, Adv.
http:/ /courtnic nic inl supremecourtltemp/3 092003 3 2 7820 13p txt
Page 9 of 11
2/
3/
24 02 2015
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
31/32
Har yana
Mr . Manj i t Si ngh, AAG
Mr . V. G. Pr agas am Adv.
Mr . S. J . Ar i st ot l e, Adv.
Mr . Pr abu Ramas ubr amani an, Adv.
Mr . I r s had Ahmed, AAG
Mr . Sam r Al i Khan, Adv.
Mr . Ranj an Mukher j e e, Adv.
Mr . S. C. Ghos h, Adv.
Mr . S. Bhowm c k, Adv.
Mr . R. P. Yadav, Adv.
Ar unachal Pr ades h Mr . Ani l Shr i vas t av, Adv.
Mr . Ri t ur aj Bi s was , Adv.
Tr i pur a Mr . Ri t ur aj Bi swas , Adv.
f or Mr . Gopal Si ngh, Adv.
Bi har Mr . Chandan Kumar , Adv.
f or Mr . Gopal Si ngh, Adv.
Mr . K. Enat ol i Ser na, Adv.
Mr . Am t Kr . Si ngh, Adv.
Mr . Pr agyan pr adi p Shar ma, Adv.
Mr . Hes hu Kay i n a, Adv.
Mani pur Mr . Sapam Bi swaj i t Mei t ei , Adv.
Mr . Kh. Nobi n Si ngh, Adv.
Mr . Mukes h Ver ma, Adv.
f or Mr . Yas h Pal Di ngr a, Adv.
Mr . B. S. Bant hi a , Adv. ( NP)
4
Mr . V. K. Ver ma, Adv.
Mr . Ni khi l Nayyar , Adv.
Mr . R. Ayyam Per u mal , Adv.
Mr . Pr adeep Mi s r a, Adv.
Mr . P . V. Yoges war a n, Adv.
Mr . B. S. Bant h i a, Adv.
Mr . Dhar am Bi r Raj Vohr a, Adv.
Mr . Abhi j i t Sengupt a , Adv.
Mr . Kul di p Si ngh, Adv. ( NP)
Mr . V. N. Raghupat h y, Adv.
Mr . P . V. Di n es h, Adv. ( NP)
Mr . As hok K. Sr i vas t ava, Adv.
Mr . C. D. Si ngh, Adv.
Mr . Anuv r at Shar ma, Adv .
Mr . Puni t Dut t Tyagi , Adv.
Mr . Tar a Chandr a Shar ma, Adv. ( NPl
Ms . Kam ni J ai s wal , Adv.
Mr . Sanj ay R. Hegde, Adv.
Mr . Mukes h K. Gi r i , Adv.
Mr . Shi bas hi s h Mi s r a, Adv.
http:/ /c ourtn ic n ic i n/ supremecourtl temp/ 3 092003 327820 13p t xt
... 4/
Page 1 of 11
24 02 2015
-
8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan
32/32
Mr . Ar un K. Si nha, Adv.
Ms . Hemant i ka Wahi , Adv.
Mr . T. V. Rat nam Adv.
Ms . Sum t a Haz ar i k a, Adv.
5
Mr . Mohan P r as ad Mehar i a, Adv .
Mr . Ar u nes hwar Gupt a , Adv .
Mr . K. R. Sas i p r abhu, Adv.
Mr . Nar es h K. Shar ma, Adv.
Mr . Aj ay pal , Adv.
Mr s . Mani k Kar anj awal a, Adv. ( NP)
Ms . C. K. Suchar i t a , Adv.
UPON hear i ng c ouns el t he Cour t made t he f o l l owi ng
o
R D E R
. .. 5/-
Mr . Rakes h Khanna, l e ar ned ASG appear i ng f or t he MoEF ,
s ubm t s t hat he wi l l f i l e a r epor t r egar di ng t he s t at us of t he
s l aught e r hous es i n Ghaz i p ur , Del hi .
We di r ec t t he Comm s si oner of t he Eas t Del h i Muni c i pal
Cor por at i on t o f i l e a St at us Repor t , wi t hi n f our weeks , i ndi c at i ng
t he s t eps t aken by t hem t o compl y wi t h t he var i ous di r ec t i ons
i s sued by t he MoEF under t he headi n g Br oad Fr amewor k f or t he
St at e Comm t t ees f o r Sl aught er Hous es i n c ompl i ance wi t h t hi s
Cour t s or der dat e d Oc t o ber 10, 2012.
Mr . P . K. Mul l i c k, c ouns el f o r t he pet i t i oner , and Mr . Vi j ay
Panj wani , c ouns el appear i ng f or t he Cent r al Pol l ut i o n Cont r ol
Boar d, s ubm t t ed t hat t hey woul d l i ke t o per s onal l y vi s i t Ghaz i pur
and s ubm t a r epor t t o t hi s Cour t . We r ecor d our appr ec i a t i o n f or
t hei r k i nd ges t ur e and ar e per m t t ed t o do s o.
The St at e Gover nment s , whi c h ar e yet t o f i l e t he St at us
Repor t i ndi c at i ng t hei r c ompl i ance wi t h t he di r ec t i ons i s sued by
t he MOEF , as ment i oned above, ar e al l owed t hr ee weeks t i me t o
f i l e t he s ame.
6
Put up on Oc t ober 01, 2013 at 3. 30 p. m
. .. 6/-
I ( N. S. K. Kame s h)
I I Cour t Mas t er
I I ( R enuk a Sadana)
I Co ur t Ma s t e r
( s epar at e s i gned r epor t abl e or der i s pl ac ed on t he f i l e)
Page 11 of 11