states and uts to respond by 10.3.2015 supreme court case wp (c) no.330 of 2001 - abhishek kadyan

Upload: naresh-kadyan

Post on 01-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    1/32

    'M. PRASAD

    SECRETARY

    MOST U RG ENT

    S UPREM E COU RT M AnER

    Governmentof India

    Ministryof UrbanDevelopment

    NirmanShawan,NewDelhi-110011

    D.O. No. N-11025/62/2015-LSG-1

    February 27, 2015

    Dear

    I would like to draw your attention to Hon'ble Supreme Court's order dated

    6.2.2015 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 330 of 2001 (Common Cause vs Union of India)

    regarding functioning of slaughter houses in the country vis-a-vis enforcement of

    standards laid down by the Bureau of Indian Standards regarding the disposal of

    animal wastes and slurry and regarding ante-mortem and post-mortem inspection of

    meat animals. Copy of the order is enclosed for your perusal.

    2. The Hon'ble Supreme Court hasdirected that action should be taken as under:-

    i.

    State Governments shall set up State Committees for overseeing the

    functioning of the slaughter houses (Vide its order dated 23.8.2012). Copy

    of order is enclosed.

    ii. The Chairman of each State Committee will be the Secretary in the

    Department of Urban Development in the State Government.

    iii. For monitoring the meetings of the activities of the State Committees,

    Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Govt. of India will be the nodal

    officer. He will coordinate with the State Committees and obtain

    information from them as required from time to time.

    iv. In the first instance, the Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Govt. of

    India (Nodal Officer) will ascertain and state on affidavit whether all the

    States have set up the Committee, in terms of the order passed by the

    Supreme Court on 23.8.2012 and whether they are functioning, in terms of

    para 4 of the Order of the Supreme Court dated 27.8.2013. Copy of order is

    enclosed.

    v. The Nodal Officer will also inform the Supreme Court whether the

    Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules, 2000 are being

    implemented and enforced and whether the broad framework prepared by

    the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India for the State

    Committees for slaughter houses is being followed.

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    2/32

    \

     /

    I

    I

    J

     

    3. The' case is coming up for hearing o 27 3 2 15 I, therefore, request you to

    , provlde the updated status In respect of your State / UT

     

    terms of the points

    indica~ed at para 2 (iv)   . {v) above at the earliest and preferably by 10.3.2015 so that

    the Hon'ble Supreme Courtcould be informed.

    The matter may please be acCorded Priority.

    Yours sincerely,

    6/~ ~

    / .  M. Prasat{L_--

    Encl.: As above

    AllChief Secretaries / Administrators of States/UTs As per list enclosed

    _

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    3/32

    Chief Secretaries of States   Administrators of Union Territories

    (as on 27.2.2015)

    Shri I.Y.R. Krishna Rao

    Chief Secretary,

    Government of Andhra Pradesh,

    Secretariat Building,

    Hyderabad-500 001.

    Tele:-040-23455340

    Fax:-040-23453700

    Andhra Pradesh

    040-23452620

    040-23455340

    040-23453700

    Shri Anjani Kumar Singh

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Bihar

    Old Secretariat

    Patna-800 015

    Bihar

    Tele:-0612-2223804,2215804

    Fax:-0612-2222085, 2215085

    Shri Ramesh Negi

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Arunachal Pradesh

    Secretariat

    Itanagar-791111

    Arunachal Pradesh

    Tele:-0360-2212595

    Fax:- 0360-2215719, 2212475

    Shri Vivek Kumar Dhand

    Chief Secretary,

    Government of Chhattisgarh,

    OKS Bhavan, Room No. 207

    Mantralaya,

    Raipur-492 001

    Chhattisgarh

    Tele:-0771-2221207

    Fax:-0771-2221206

    Shri Jitesh Khosla

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Assam

    Block-C 3

    rd

    Floor

    Secretariat, Dispur

    Guwahati-781006

    Assam

    Tele:-0361-2261120

    Fax:-0361-2260900

    Shri K.K.Sharma

    Chief Secretary,

    Government of Goa,

    Secretariat,

    Porvoriam, Goa-403001

    Tele:-0832-2419402

    Fax:-0832-2415201

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    4/32

    S hri O J Pan d ian

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Gujarat

    Block No.1, 3rd floor

    New SachivalayaComplex

    Gandhinagar-382010

    Gujarat

    Tele:-079-23220372

    Fax:-079-23250305

    S hri R ajiv G auba

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Jharkhand

    Secretariat

    Ranchi, 834001

    Jharkhand

    Off:0651-2400240, 0651-2400250

    0651-2403255

    Shri O epinder S ingh O hesi

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Haryana

    Haryana Civil Secretariat

    Chandigarh-160 001

    Tele:-0172-2740118

    Fax:-0172-2740317

    S hri K au sh ik M ukh erjee

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Karnataka

    Vidhana Soudha

    Bangalore-560001

    Karnataka

    Tele:-080-22252442

    Fax:-080-22258913

    S h ri P M itra

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Himachal Pradesh

    Secretariat

    Shimla-171001

    Himachal Pradesh

    Tele:-0177-2621022

    Fax:-0177-2621813

    S hri J iji T ho m so n

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Kerala

    Secretariat

    Thiruvanthapuram.

    Kerala

    Tele:-0471-2333147,2327376

    Fax:-0471-2327176

    Shri M oham m ad Iqbal Khandey

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Jammu

     

    Kashmir

    Civil Secretariat

    Srinagar-190001

    Jammu and Kashmir

    Tele:-0194-2455353

    Fax:-0194-2452356 (Srinagar)

    0191-2546773

    0191-2544338(Jammu)

    Shri Anthony J C O esa

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Madhya Pradesh

    Vallabh Bhavan

    Bhopal-462003

    Madhya Pradesh

    Tele:-0755-2441848, 2441521

    Fax:-0755-2441751

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    5/32

    S hri S wadheen S K shatriya

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Maharashtra

    Room No.518, 5

    th

    Floor

    Main Building Mantralaya

    Mumbai-400032

    Maharashtra

    Tele:-022-22025042

    Fax:-022-22028594

    S h ri C J P o nra j

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Nagaland

    Secretariat

    Kohima-797001

    Nagaland

    Tele:-0370-2270082

    Fax:-0370-2270057, 2222137

    S h ri P C L aw m k un ga

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Manipur

    Room No.171 South Block

    Secretariat

    Imphal-795001

    Manipur

    Tele:-0385-221144

    Fax:-0385-2452629

    Shri G okul Chandra Pati

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Orissa

    General Admn. Dept.

    Orrisa Secretariat

    Bhubaneshwar-751001

    Orissa

    Tele:-0674-2534300

    Fax:-0674-2536660

    Shri P B W arjri

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Meghalaya

    Main Secretariat Building

    Shilong-793001

    Meghalaya

    Tele:-0364-221144, 2224801

    Fax:-0364-2452629, 2225978

    S hri S arve sh K au sh al

    Chief Secretary,

    Government of Punjab,

    Punjab Civil Secretariat,

    Chandigarh-160001

    Punjab

    Tele:-0172-2740156

    Fax:-0172-2742488

    Shri La lma ls awma

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Mizoram

    Civil Secretariat, Block-C

    Aizwal-796001

    Mizoram

    Tele:-0389-2322411

    Fax:-0389-2322745,2323467

    S h ri C S R a ja n

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Rajasthan

    Secretariat

    Jaipur-302005

    Rajasthan

    Tele:-0141-2227254

    Fax:-0141-2227114

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    6/32

    Shri Rinchen Ongmu

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Sikkim

    Tashiling Secretariat

    Gangtok -737101

    Sikkim

    Tele:-03592-202315,222315

    Fax:-03592-204323, 224323

    Shri Alok Ranjan

    Chief Secretary,

    Government of Uttar Pradesh,

    Lal Bahadur Shastri Bhavan,

    UPSecretariat,

    Lucknow-226001.

    Uttar Pradesh

    Tele:-0522-2221599

    Fax:-0522-2239283

    Shri K.Gnanadesikan

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Tamil Nadu

    Secretariat

    Chennai-600009

    Tamil Nadu

    Tele:-044-25671555

    Fax:-044-25672304

    Dr. Rajiv Sharma

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Telangana,

    Secretariat Building,

    Hyderabad-500 001.

    Shri G. Kameswara Rao

    Chief Secretary

    Government of Tripura

    Civil Secretariat

    Agartala-799001

    Tripura

    Tele:-0381-2323200

    Fax:-0381-2324013

    Shri Sanjay Mitra

    Chief Secretary

    Government of West Bengal

    Writers' Building

    Kolkata -700001

    West Bengal

    Tele:-033-22145858

    Fax:-033-22144328

    ShriN. RaviShanker

    Chief Secretary,

    Government of Uttarkhand,

    Uttarakhand Secretariat,

    4BShubhash Road,

    Dehradun -248001.

    Uttrakhand

    Tele:-0135-2712100, 2712094

    Fax:-0135-2712500, 2712113

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    7/32

    U Ts

    Shri Anand Prakash

    Chief Secretary

    U.T.of Andaman   Nicobar Islands

    Secretariat

    Port Blair, Andaman -744101

    Andaman and Nicobar (UT)

    Tele:-03192-233110

    Fax:-03192-232656

    Shri Chetan B Sanghi

    Chief Secretary,

    Puducherry Administration,

    Puducherry -605001.

    Puducherry (UT)

    0413-2334145

    0413-2335512

    0413-2337575

    Shri Vijay Kumar D ev

    Advisor to Administrator

    U.T.of Chandigarh

    Secretariat, Sector 9

    Chandigarh -160001

    Tele:-0172-27401542740118

    Fax:-0172-27401652740317

    Chandigarh (UT)

    S hri A shish K un dra

    (Administrator)

    U .T. of Dadra   Nagar Haveli

    Secretariat

    Silvasa-396230.

    Dadra   Nagar Haveli

    Tele:-0260-2230700 2642777

    Fax:-0260-2230775 2230997

    Shri

    D.M.

    Spolia

    Chief Secretary

    Govt of NCTof Delhi,

    Players Building, 'A' Wing,

    I.PEstate

    New Delhi

    Tel: 011-23392100, 23392101

    Fax:011-23392102

    S hri H R ajesh P ra sa d

    Admin istrator

    U.T. of Lakshadweep

    Secretariat

    Kavaratti-682555

    Lakshadweep (UT)

    Tele:-04896-262255

    Fax:-004896-262184

    S hri A sh ish K und ra

    (Administrator)

    U.T.of Daman

     

    Diu

    Secretariat

    Daman

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    8/32

    1

      5   5 4 3

    I TEMNO. 43

    CObRT NO. 8

    SECTI ON PI L

    SUP REM E C 0 U R T 0 FI N D I A

    RECORD OF PROCEEDI NGS

    W i t Pet i t i on( Ci vi l ) - No.309/ 2003

    LAXM ~ARAI N MOOI

    Pet i t i oner ( s}

    VERSUS·

    UNI ON OF NDI A   ORS. ·

    Respondent ( s)

     ; - 

    )

    ( W th appl n. ( st f or p~: f ~si on t o f i l e r ej oi nder af f i davi t ,

    di r ect i ons, perms si on t o ~   e addi t i onal af f i davi t , per m ssi on t o

    f i l e addi t i onal document s , per i ni ssi onto f i l e submssi on and of f i ce

    report)

    w. P. ( C) No. 44/ 2004

    ( Wt h appl n. '( s ) f or di r ect i ons and exempt i on f r omf i l i ng o. T. and

    may - r ef er t o r emar ks)

    W P. ( C) ~o. 688/ 2007

    ( Wt h appl n. (5) .f or st ay)

    SLP( C) No. 14121/ 2009

    ( Ref und of cost and· Of f i ce : Report )

    Dat e: 06/ 02/ 2015 These mat t ers were cal l ed on f or hear i ng t oday.

    CORAM :

    HON' BLE MR. J USTi CE MADAN B. LOKUR

    HON' BLE

    MR.

    J USTI CE UDAY UMESH LALI T

    For Pet i t i oner ( S)

    Mr . Pr anab Kumar Mul i i ck, AOR

    Mr s. Soma Mul l i ck, Adv.

    Mr . Sebat K' l i r O. areur i a, Adv.

    Mr . Raj Panj wani , Sr . Adv.

    Ms. Pur ni ma Bhat , AOR

    Mr . C. D. Si ngh, AOR

    Mr . B. D. Sharma, AOR

    i n WP 688/ 07

    Ms. , Sakshi Kakkar , Adv.

    g . ~

    J ,. _

     _

    .  f'.~ ~

    fj

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    9/32

    i n SLP 14121/ 09

    For Respondent ( ~) .

    uor

    CPCB

    2

    Mr . Nar ot t am Vyas, Adv.

    Mr . S. C. Varma, Adv.

    Mr . K. Radhakr i shnan, Sr . Adv.

    Ms. Suni ta Sharma, ~dv.

    Ms. Ki r an Bhar dwaj , Adv.

    Mr . M Khai r at i , Adv.

    Mr . D. S. M~hr a, AOR

    t;

    I

    Mr . L. C. Agr awal a, AOR

    Ms. C. K. t ' i Suchar i t a AOR

    . . - . .~~~

    Mr . Vi j ay anj wani , AOR

    Ms. Madhur panj wani , Adv.

    Mr . V. K. Ver ma, AOR

    Mr . Ni khi l Nayyar , AOR

    Mr . Ambuj _ Agr awal , Adv.

    Mr . Dhananj ay Bai j al , Adv.

    Ms; Akanksha, Adv.

    Mr . T. M Si ngh, Adv.

    Mr . Ranj an Mukher j ee, AOR

    Mr . B. V. Bal aram Das, AOR

    Mr . Yash Pal Dhi ngr a, AOR

    Mr . Kul di p Si ngh, AOR

    Mr . Praveen Swar up, AOR

    Ms. Sushma Verma, Ad .

    Mr . Suvesh Kumar , Adv.

    Mr . Lokendr a Kumar , Adv.

    Mr . Sanj i v Sen, Sr . Adv.

    Mr . Dev J. Roy, Adv.

    Mr . Praveen Swar up, Adv.

    Mr . Mohi t Kumar Shah, AOR

    Ms. G. I ndi r a, AOR

    Mr . Pahl ad Si ngh Sharma, AOR

    Mr . Ashok K. Sr i vastava, AOR

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    10/32

    3

    Ms. Praveena Gau~am AOR

    Mr . Puni t Dut t Tyagi , AOR

    Mr . Tara Chandra Sharma, AOR

    Ms. Kam ni J ai swal , AOR·

    Mr ~Abhi j a~ P. Medh, AOR

    Mr . Sanj aYf : : R.Hegde, AOR

    Mr .

    Muke~ , ' l r ?K.i r i , AOR

    j~: -

    Shi bi i hi sh M sr a, AOR

    ~

    ;

    Mr .

    Mr ; Ar un K. Si nha, AOR

    Mr . B. S. Bant hi a; AOR

    ~ .

    Mr . Khwai r akpam Nobi n Si ngh, AOR

    Mr . T. V. Rat nam AOR

    Ms. Sum t a Hazar i ka, AOR

    Mr; Mohanprasad Mehar i a; AOR

    Mr . Aruneshwar Gupt a, AOR

    Mr . Suni l Fer nandes, AOR

    Mr . K. R. Sasi pr abhu, AOR

    Mr . Raj esh Sr i vast ava, AOR

    Mr . T. V. George, AOR

    Mr . Anuvrat Sharma, AOR

    Mr . Naresh K. Sharma, . AOR

    Mr . Aj ay Pal , AOR

    Mrs. Mani k Karc: m a' Wal a, AOR

    Mr . Abhi j i t sengupt a, AOR

    Ms. C. K. suchar i t a, AOR

    Mr . pr adeep M sr a, AOR

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    11/32

    For St at es of

    Andhra Pradesh

    Ar unachal Pradesh

    Assam

    -r

    Bi har

    Chhat t i sgar h

    Goa

    Guj ar at

    Haryana

    H. P.

    J K

    4

    Mr . Sur~ Si ngh, Adv.

    Mr . Sam r Al i Khan, AOR

    Mr . S. K. Verma, AOR

    Ms. A. . Subhashi ni , ~dv.

    , ,1

    Mr . Gunt ur . .r abhakar , Adv.

    Ms. Prernaf S~ngh, Adv.

    Mr . Ani l . S}l J : i vast av,AOR

    Mr . Ri t u

    ./~,~j'~

    Adv.

    J~  ~t

    Mr . Navni t  Kumar , Adv.

    Mr . Ri ku Sarma  Adv.

    f or  is Corpor at e Law Gr oup

    Mr . Gopal Si ngh  AOR

    Mr . Mani sh Kumar , Adv.

    Ms. Rashm ~hr i vast ava, Adv.

    Mr . Apoor v Kur up, Adv.

    Mr . Ani r uddha P. Mayee, Adv.

    Mr . V. C. Shukl a, Adv.

    Mr . Pawan Shr ee Agr awal , Adv.

    Mr . A. Sel vi n Raj a, Adv.

    Ms. Char udat t a Mahi ndr akar , Adv.

    Mr . Si ddhar t h Bhat nagar ; Adv.

    Mr . Si dhar t h Mohan, Adv.

    Mr . Rahul Arya, Adv.

    Mr . T. Mahi pal , AOR

    Ms. Hemant i ka Wahi , AOR

    Ms. J esal Wahi , Adv.

    Ms. Preet i Bhardwaj , Adv.

    Ms. Gi ss Ant ony, Adv.

    Mr . Ar un Bhar dwaj , AAG

    Mr . Par veen Kumar , Adv.

    Ms. B. Var dhan, · Adv.

    Mr . Kamal Mohan Gupt a, AOR

    Mr . Sur yanar yana Si ngh, AAG

    Ms. Pr agat i Neekhr a, AOR

    Mr . G. M. Kawasa, Adv.

    Mr . A. Suresh, Adv.

    Mr . Ashok Mat hur , AOR

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    12/32

    . : [ har khand

    Karnat aka

    Ker al a

    Madhya Pr adesh

    Maharasht r a

    Mani p' Ur

    M zoram

    Nagal and

    Raj ast han

    Si kki m

    Tam l Nadu

    Tel angana

    Tr i pur a

    ut t ar Pradesh

    5

    Mr . Gopal Pr asad, AOR

    Mr . J ayesh GauraV, Adv.

    Mr . V. N. Raghupathy, AOR

    Mr . Lagnesh M shr a' , Adv.

    Mr . Par i kshi t . Angadi , Adv.

    Ms. Bi na M~dhavan, AOR

    Mr. Sunnayt ,~houdhar y, Adv.

    Mr . M shr a , ~f 1urabh,AOR

    Ms.

    .~.~;-r

    .~;;:

    Ani r ¥~a P. Mayea, Adv.

    Asha ~~pal an Nai r , Adv.

     

    .

    Mr . Sapam Bi swaj i t Mei t ei , Adv.

    Mr . Ashok K. ~ ngh, AOR

    Mr . Z. H. I saac, ; Hai di ng, Adv.

    ' Mr . Pragyan Sharma, Adv;

    Mr . Heshu Kayi na, Adv.

    Mr . P. V. Yogeswar an, AOR

    - Mr s. K. Enatol i Sema, Adv;

    Mr . Am t Kumar Si ngh, Adv.

    Mr . Bai aj i Sr i ni vasan, AOR

    Mr . S. S . ' Shci nl sher y,AAG

    Mr . Am t Sharma, Adv.

    Mr . Sandeep Si ngh, Adv.

    Mr . A. Mar i ar put ham AAG

    Ms. Ar una Mathur , Adv.

    Mr . Yusuf Khan, Adv.

    Mr . K. Vi j ay Kumar , Adv.

    f or

    M s

    ' Ar putham Ar una   Co.

    Mr . M l ' ogesh Kanr i a, AOR

    Ms. J . J anani , Ad .

    Mr . A. Sant ha Kumar an, Adv.

    Mr . P. Venkat Reddy, Adv.

    Mr . Sumanth Nookal a, Adv.

    f or

     is

    Venkat Pal wai Law Associ at es

    Mr . Gopal Si ngh, - AOR

    Mr . Ri t ur aj Bi swas, Adv.

    Ms. Rashm Shr i vast ava, Adv.

    Mr . Gaurav Bhat i a, AAG

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    13/32

    6

    Mr . I r shad Ahmad, AAG

    Mr . M :R . Shams had , AOR

    Mr . Raj at Si ngh, Adv.

    Mr . Adi t ya Samaddar , Adv.

    Mr . Shashank Si ngh, Adv.

    A&N I s l ands

    Mr . Ashu t osh Kr . Sharma, Adv.

    Mr . J . K. Bhat i a, Adv.

    Mr . Ani p S~~hthey, AOR

    Mr . Mohi t R~ul , Adv.

    Mr . SaakaCl , r  ardana, Adv ~

    .-  ~:. ~

    .

      ~t

    Mr . K. V . .: / ' Tagdi shvar an,Adv.

    Mr s. G. ~ ra, Adv.

    Ut t arakhand

    West Bengal

    Chandi gar h

    Mr . Gopal Si ngh, AOR

    Ms. Vi m a Si nh~, Adv.

    Puducher r y

    Mr . V. G. Pragasam . AOR

    Mr .

    S.J.

    Ar i st ot l e, Adv.

    Mr . Pr abu Ramasubr amani an, ' Adv.

    UPON hear i ng t he counsel t he Cour t made t he f ol l owi ng

    O. R D E

    R

    W P. CC) .No. 330/ 2001 ( Common Cause V. · Uni on of I ndi a)

    We haVe hear c\ l ear ned counsel f or t he par t i es.

    The pr ayer i n W P. ( C) No. 330 of 2001 [ Common Cause v.

    Uni on of I ndi a] i s f pr enf ' or cement of st andards l ai d down

    by t he Bur eau of I ndi an st andar ds i n I S 8895: 1978

    .r egardi ng the' di sposal of ~ni mal wast ~ and sl ur r y and I S

    1982: 1971

    r egar di ng

    ant e-mort em

    and

    post - mort em

    i nspect i on of meat ani mal s.

    The Secr et ar y i n t he M ni st r y of Cons~er Af f ai r s,

    Food and Publ i c Di st r i but i on, Gover nment of I ndi . a shoul d

    i nf orm Mr . K. Radhakr i shnan, Sr . Advocat e appear i ng f or

    Uni on of I ndi a, wi t hi n t hr ee weeks as t o whet her t he

    st andar ds t hat have been l ai d down r equi r e any r evi ew or

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    14/32

    7

    update and/or modification due to the passage of time.

    By an order dated

    23.08. 2012

    this Court had directed

    setting up of state Committees for overseeing the

    functioning of the' slaughter houses.

    The Chairman of

    ~~_.., , •. ~II

    each state committee is \ the Secretary in the Department

    . . .. . . . . .

     .

    --

    .

    ~ ~ ,

    -

    of Urban Development in tthe State Government.

    in

    the

    Ministry

    D.~velppmen,

    Government of Iridia,. who.

    w~11

    coordina.te ·w.i·ththe- state

    Co. .itte~s. and obtain ·information from them as reqaired

    In the first instance, the Secretary

    in the Ministry of UrbanDevelopment,Governmentof India

    (the Nodai officer) ill ascertain and state on affidavit

    whether all th.. states have set up the conunittee in termS

    of the ,.o,' 'derpassed by this court on 2~.08.2012 and

    whether they are .functioning in termSof paragraph 4 of

    the order dated 27.08.2013.

    The.Nodal Officer will also inform us whether the

    prevention of Cruelty. to Animills (Slaughter House)Rules,

    2000 are being implementedand enforced and whether the

    broad frameworkprepared by the Ministry of Envi orunent

    and Forests, Governmentef India for the state Co_ittees

    for slaughter ,houses

    i.~

    being followed.

    The needful be

    done#w.ihin four weeks.

    List this matter on

    27th

    March,

    2015.

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    15/32

    8

    W.P. (C) No. 44/2004 (People for Ethical Treatment of

    Animals v. Union of India

     

    Ora.)

    Tag with W.P; (C) 'No.330/2001.

    Writ Petition (Civil)· No..309/2003 (Laxmi Narain Modi v.

    Union of India   Ors.) .

    .~

    ~.

    The petitioner is s¥d to have passed away.

    .  .  

    ~

    Since the issues r.-4,j.sed·n the petition are similar

      '_ ' '.'~~~;,.

    .

    to the earlier petitH.b, .viz., W.P.(C) No.330 of 2001

    [ConunonCause v.. Union of India], we dispose of this writ

    ..

    _

    petition.

    However,· we grant liberty to the learned counsel

    appearing in this petition to make·their submissions in

    the petition filed by CommonCause.

    Pending. applications, if any, are also disposed of.

    Wri.t Petition (Civil) .No.688/2007 (Sushil Kumarv. State

    of

    c.

    P.

     

    Ors.)

    This petition pertains to the· slaughter house in

    Meerut, Uttar pradesh.

    Weare not inclined to· entertain t.his petition. The

    petition is accordingly dismissed.

    However~

    we grant liberty to the petitioner

    to

    ... 1 t  to th·e slaughter, house in

    agi tate the assuea re a l.ng. .

    Meerut before an appropriate forum.

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    16/32

    9

    SLP C l No.14121 of 2009 (Hansraj, Bhardwaj v. Union of

    India 6 Anr;)

    We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned

    judgment. The special leiave petition is dismissed' .

    f.

     > .. :

      f

     ~ ~ k

    :jf~~.

      '

    . ,~ (

    (JASWI~~R)

    COuRT MASTER

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    17/32

    ITEM NO.4

    COURT NO.12

    SECTION PIL

    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

    WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 309 OF 2003

    LAXMI NARAIN MODI

    Petitioner(s)

    VERSUS

    UNION OF INDIA ORS.

    Respondent(s)

    (With appln(s) for directions, permission to file rejoinder affidavit,

    permission to file additional documents, permission to file additional

    affidavit, permission to file submissions and office report)

    WITH W.P(C) NO. 330 of 2001

    (With appln(s) for directions)

    W.P(C) NO. 44 of 2004

    (With appln(s) for directions, exemption from filing O.T.)

    W.P(C) NO. 688 of 2007

    (With appln(s) for stay)

    Date: 23/08/2012 These matters were called on for hearing today.

    CORAM:

    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN

    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA

    For Petitioner(s)

    Mr. Pranab Kumar Mullick,Adv.

    Ms. Purnima Bhat, Adv.

    Mr. C.D. Singh, Adv.

    UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

    ORDER

    These writ petitions have been preferred in public interest seeking

    various directions to the State Governments as well as to the Union of

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    18/32

    India, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Animal Welfare Board of

    India and other statutory authorities to effectively implement the

    provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Establishment and

    Registration of Societies for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) Rules, 2000

    and also the provisions of Environment Protection Act, 1986, Schedule

    I, Entry 50 and also Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules,

    2000 etc. Further, direction is also sought to ensure that the animals meant

    for slaughter are not transported in violation of Transport of Animals Rule,

    1978 and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Transport on Foot) Rules,

    2000. Further, prayers have also been made to ensure that the

    recognized slaughter houses are in conformity with the provisions of

    the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules, 2000 and

    also for other consequential reliefs. A detailed affidavit has been

    filed by the Central Pollution Control Board (for short CPCB) as

    early as in October, 2003 wherein they have categorically stated as

    follows:

    The CPCB is of the view that the slaughter houses generate

    substantial quantities of effluents and solid wastes. These slaughter

    houses causes nuisance by way of foul smell due to improper handling. It

    is, therefore, necessary that these units should install pollution control

    devices so that they can comply with the prescribed standards. Further, it

    was stated that the existing slaughter houses need to modernize their

    operations with greater emphasis of utilization of waste to reduce

    environmental problems and to maintain hygienic conditions. It is also

    pointed out that most of the slaughter houses in the country are very old

    and operate without basic amenities such as proper flooring, water supply,

    ventilation etc., and there is no need to upgrade old slaughter houses on

    modern lines. Therefore, the CPBC submitted that all the slaughter houses

    in the country should comply with the prescribed standards. The

    local municipal agencies and concerned police should ensure that no

    illegal slaughtering takes place and also the units conform to the standards

    set by the State Pollution Control Boards and Pollution Control

    Committees.

    This Court has passed various orders alerting the State

    Governments to properly implement the various provisions referred to

    hereinbefore but still no effective steps have been taken by various States

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    19/32

    either to constitute Committees or to see that the slaughter houses are

    functioning in accordance with the rules framed. The matters have again

    come up for hearing today.

    Learned senior counsel appearing for the Ministry of

    Environment and Forest (MoEF) brought to our knowledge a

    decision taken by the MoEF under the Chairmanship of Secretary,

    Ministry of Environment and Forest on 26.04.2012. In the

    meeting, the CPCB has presented its status of 15 States whereas

    the Ministry of Labour gave a status of 20 States and the action

    plan was also discussed.

    After examining the matter in depth by the Committee, they found

    the necessity of constituting State Committee for slaughter houses to

    fulfill the mandatory requirements under the various legislations dealing

    with the functioning of the slaughter houses in the country. The

    decision of dated 26.04.2012 is extracted hereunder for easy reference:-

     1. CPCB will write to all States informing about its guidelines

    for slaughter houses. [Action: CPCB)

    2. CPCB will also initiate action against all slaughter houses

    which are not meeting the norms and implement the

    abattoir rules through SPCB. It was discussed that SPCB

    even has powers to close slaughter houses under these rules.

    [Action: CPCB)

    J.States to be requested to constitute State Committee for

    SlaughterHousesas follows:

    i) Secretary of the Departmentof Urban envelopment of

    .,

    the State-Chairman.

    ii) Rep.Departmentof Health.

    iii) Rep.Departmentof Animal Husbandry.

    iv) Rep.Departmentof Labour.

    v) Food Safety Commissioner representing Central Food

    Safety andStandardAuthorityof India.

    vi) Rep.StatePollutionControl Board.

    vii) Rep.StateAnimalWelfareBoard.

    viii) Rep.of State Police

    ix) 2 prominentpersonsnominatedby state government.

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    20/32

    x) Such other officers and experts as the members may

    choose to co-opt.

    4. Functions of the State Committee for Slaughter Houses so

    constituted may be as following:

    i) to identify and prepare a list of all the Slaughter

    Houses (S.H.s) located within the local self Govt.

    (Municipal Corporations, Panchayats etc.)

    ii) to call for reports from the District Magistrate or the Dy.

    Commissioner and District Food Safety Inspector as

    the case may be on the condition/functioning of the

    S.H.s and also on the compliance of the relevant

    applicable laws.

    iii) to recommend modernization of old slaughter houses

    (S.H.s) and to relocate S.H.s which are located within or

    in close proximity of a residential area.

    iv) to recommend appropriate measures for dealing with

    solid waste, water/air pollution and for preventing

    cruelty to the animals meant for slaughter.

    v) to carry out surprise random inspections of S.H.s

    regularlyand to issue directions for compliance of the

    recommendationsthat maybe made by it.

    vi) to send bi-annual reports on the state S.H.s to the

    Central Committee and to refer issues that may

    require Central Committee recommendations or

    Central Govt. assistance.

    vii) to accord final approval for licensing of S.H.S to

    LocalSelf Govt.

    viii) to identify on an ongoing basis, the unlicensed

    slaughter houses in the region, and other

    unlicensed,unlawfulestablishmentswhere animals are

    being slaughtered,on howsoever a small scale, and

    take the help of the District Magistrateand other law

    enforcement agencies to crackdownon the same.

    viii) To checkfor child labour.

    [Action:AWD)

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    21/32

    Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners also pointed out the

    necessity of including the Secretary, Local Self Government as well as

    the Secretary, Panchayat Raj also as Committee Members for effective

    implementation of the various legislations.

    Further, it was also pointed out that even though the decision

    was taken by the MoEF on 26.04.2012 the same was forwarded to

    various State Governments only on 2.7.2012 and so far no effective steps

    have been taken by the State Governments to constitute the Committee

    and to take further follow up action. The functions to be discharged by

    such Committees have also been dealt with in the meeting held on

    26.04.2012 for proper implementation. The early constitution of the

    committees is, therefore, highly necessary for proper and speedy

    implementation of the rules under the various enactments.

    In such circumstances, we are inclined to give direction to all the

    State Governments and the Union Territories to constitute the State

    Committees for slaughters houses, as decided in the meeting held on

    26.04.2012, including the Secretary, Local Self Government as well as

    Secretary, Panchayat Raj as Members of the Committee over and

    above the Members already mentioned.

    Since the matter is pending in this Court for a number of years,

    we are inclined to give directions to the State Governments and the

    Union Territories to constitute the Committees within a period of one

    month and report compliance.

    Further, we also direct CPCB to write to all the State

    Governments informing about the guidelines for slaughter houses as well

    as to initiate action against all slaughter houses which are not meeting the

    norms and implement the abattoir rules through State Pollution Control

    Board (SPCB).

    The CPCB will initiate steps within a period of two weeks from

    today. The CPCB is also directed to submit its report within a period of

    one month.

    List the matters after six weeks on a non-miscellaneous day.

    I(NARENDRA PRASAD)I

    I(RENUKA SADANA)I

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    22/32

    REPORTABLE

    I N THE SUPREME COURT OF I NDI A

    CI VI L ORI GI NAL J URI SDI CTI ON

    WRI T PETI TI ON ( C) No. 309 of 2003

    Laxm Narai n Modi

    . . . . Pet i t i oner

    Versus

    Uni on of I ndi a and ot her s

    . . . . Respondent s

    o

    R D E R

    K. S. Radhakr i shnan, J .

    1. We have passed a det ai l ed or der on 9. 7. 2013 expr essi ng t he

    appr ehensi on as t o whet her t he Comm t t ees const i t ut ed, f ol l ow ng our

    ear l i er or der dat ed 23. 8. 2012, ar e ef f ect i vel y f unct i oni ng and whet her

    proper s t eps are bei ng t aken f or pr oper i mpl ement at i on of t he pr ovi si ons of

    t he var i ous l egi sl at i ons whi ch have been passed, w t h r egar d t o t he

    tr ansport at i on of ani mal s , mai nt ai ni ng of sl aught er houses, ef f l uent and

    sol i d wast e di sposal et c.

    2. Vi de our or der dat ed 9. 7. 2013, we had di r ect ed al l t he St at e

    Gover nment s/ Uni on Ter r i t or i es t o f i l e t hei r act i on t aken r epor t s w t hi n one

    month. Few of t he St at es have f i l ed t he act i on t aken r epor t s det ai l i ng t he

    f unct i oni ng of t he Commt tees const i t uted. We al so di r ect ed t he MoEF t o

    f i nal i ze t he gui del i nes f or t he ef f ect i ve and pr oper f unct i oni ng of t he

    State Commt tees f or over s eei ng t he f unct i oni ng of t he sl aught er houses.

    I n obedi ence t o our di r ect i on, t he MoEF, on 27. 8. 2013, f i l ed a compl i ance

    repor t encl os i ng the broad f ramework t o be f ol l owed by the State Commt tees

    f or ef f ect i ve superv i si on of t he sl aught er houses and al so w t h r egar d t o

    the t r anspor ta t i on of ani mal s, l oadi ng and unl oadi ng, ef f l uent di sposal ,

    sol i d wast e di sposal and al so w t h r egar d t o t he per i odi cal i nspect i on of

    s l aughter houses by the respect i ve St at e Ani mal Wel f ar e Boards.

    3. We r ei t er at e t he i mpor t ance of pr oper i mpl ement at i on of t he

    provi si ons of t he Pr event i on of Cruel t y t o Ani mal s ( Establ i shment and

    Regi s t rat i on of Soci et i es f or Pr event i on of Cr uel t y t o Ani mal s ) Rul es,

    2000, t he Envi r onment Protecti on Act , 1986, t he Sol i d Wast es ( Management

    and Handl i ng) Rul es, 2000 and t he Pr event i on of Cr uel t y t o Ani mal s

    ( Sl aught er House) Rul es , 2000. Over and above, i t i s al so of ext r eme

    i mpor t ance that al l t he Stat e Gover nment s, t he St at e Ani mal Wel f ar e Boards,

    Pol l ut i on Contr ol Boar d et c. shoul d scr upul ousl y f ol l ow t he gui del i nes

    i ssued by t he MoEF, i n obedi ence t o t he di rect i on gi ven by t hi s Cour t on

    10. 10. 2012. The gui del i nes ar e ext r acted herei nbel ow f or easy r ef er ence:

     GUI DELI NES FOR TRANSPORTATI ON OF ANI MALS AND SLAUGHTER HOUSES

    RESPONSI BI LI TI ES OF ANI MAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT

    Any l i ves tock whi ch are pr ocur ed f r om t he mar ket are t o be cer t i f i ed by a

    Vet er i nary Surgeon f or i ssui ng a f i t ness cer t i f i cat e i n t he f orm speci f i ed

    by t he Cent r al Gover nment f or t he pur pose of t r anspor ta t i on.

    The l oadi ng and unl oadi ng of t he ani mal s i n t he mar ket pl ace and bef or e

    transportat i on shal l be super vi sed by t he concerned of f i ci al s of t he Ani mal

    Husbandr y Depar tment t o ensur e t hat t he ani mal s ar e not subj ect ed t o

    unnecessary pai n or suf f er i ng.

    I n addi t i on t o t he above heal t h cer t i f i cat e a cer t i f i cat e has t o be

    i ssued as per t he Rul e 96 of t he Tr anspor t of Ani mal s ( Amendment ) Rul es,

    2001 by the Of f i cer of t he Ani mal Husbandry Depar tment not bel ow t he r ank

    of As si s t ant Di r ect or / Deputy Di rect or / Chi ef veter i nar y Of f i cer .

    The Ani mal Husbandry aut hor i t y shal l ensur e t hat al l ani mal s ar e pr ovi ded

    w th shade, shel t er , f ood and wat er as necessary and t hey ar e t et her ed

    secur el y i n a way whi ch does not cause unnecessar y di scom or t t o ani mal s.

    The Ani mal Husbandr y Depar tment shal l ensur e t hat t he si ck, l ame, i nj ur ed

    and pregnant ani mal s ar e not t r anspor ted f or Sl aught er .

    They shoul d al so ensure that t he ani mal s ar e never l i f t ed or

    head, hor ns, ear s, f eet , t ai l or any other par t of t he Body

    cause unnecessary suf f er i ng.

    dragged by

    whi ch m ght

    http://courtnic nic  inls upremecourtltemp/3 092003 3 27820 13p  txt

    Page 1 of 11

    24 02 2015

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    23/32

    DOCUMENTATI ON BY DI FFERENT AUTHORI TI ES

    I t shoul d be ensur ed t hat each consi gnment shal l bear a

    bol d r ed l et t er s t he name, addr ess and t el ephone number

    consi gnor and consi gnee, t he number and t ypes of cat t l e

    and quant i t y of r at i ons and f ood pr ovi ded.

    l abel show ng i n

    ( i f any) of t he

    bei ng t r anspor t ed

    The consi gnor shal l be i nf ormed about t he t r ai n or vehi cl e i n whi ch t he

    consi gnment of cat t l e i s bei ng sent and i t s ar ri val t i me i n advance.

    The consi gnment of cat t l e shal l be booked by t he next t r ai n or vehi cl e

    and shal l not be det ai ned af t er t he consi gnment i s accept ed f or booki ng.

    GUI DELI NES TO BE FOLLOWED BY THE AUTHORI TI ES FOR TRANSPORTATI ON OF

    DI FFERENT ANI MALS (CATTLE, SHEEP AND GOAT, PI G) THROUGH RAI L OR RAOD.

    The aver age space pr ovi ded per cat tl e i n Rai l way wagon or vehi cl e shal l

    not be l ess t han t ~ O squar e met r es.

    Sui tabl e r ope and pl at f orms shoul d be used f or l oadi ng cat t l e f r om

    vehi cl es.

    I n case of r ai l way wagon t he dr opped door of t he wagon may be used as a

    r amp when l oadi ng or unl oadi ng i s done t o t he pl at f or m

    Cat t l e shal l be l oaded af t er t hey ar e pr oper l y f ed and gi ven wat er .

    Wat er i ng ar rangement s on r out e shal l be made and suf f i ci ent quant i t i es of

    wat er shal l be car r i ed f or emer gency.

    Suf f i ci ent f eed and f odder w t h adequat e r eser ve shal l be car r i ed t o l ast

    dur i ng t he j our ney.

    Adequat e vent i l at i on shal l be ensur ed.

    Emer gency / f i r st - ai d equi pment i s car r i ed.

    Vehi cl e shoul d have sui tabl e r amps and pl at f orms f or l oadi ng and

    unl oadi ng.

    Ther e shoul d be suf f i ci ent beddi ng on t he f l oor of t he vehi cl e.

    Vehi cl e br east bar s shoul d be pr oper l y pl aced.

    Vehi cl es ar e mai nt ai ned so as not t o cause i nj ur y, pai n or suf f er i ng.

    Vehi cl e i s cl ear l y i dent i f i ed as an ani mal car ri er .

    Ther e i s a per manent i ndi c at i on of t he maxi mum ani mal / vehi c l e l oad.

    The l at est amended space al l owance f or t ranspor ti ng t he cat t l e by r ai l or

    vehi cl e i s gi ven i n t he Tabl e I & I I gi ven bel ow:

    I Cat t l e wei ghi ng upt o 200 Kg.

    I Cat t l e wei gh- i ng 200- 300 Kg.

    I Cat t l e wei ghi ng 300- 400 Kg.

    I Cat t l e wei ghi ng above 400 Kg.

    11 Squar e Met er ( Sq. Mt r . )

    11. 20 Squar e Met er I

    11. 40 Square Meter I

    12. 0 Square Meter - I

    http:/ /courtnic nic inlsupremecourtl temp/3092003 32 7820 13p txt

    Page 2 of 11

    24 02 2015

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    24/32

    Page 3 o f 11

    TABLE - I I

    Space requi rement for Cat t l e whi l e bei ng t r anspor t ed i n commonl y s i zed

    r oad vehi cl es

    I Number of Cat t l e

    I Vehi cl e Si zel Fl oor Ar eal Cat t l e I Cat t l e I Cat t l e I Cat t l e I

    I Lengt h x l of Vehi cl el wei ghi ng I wei ghi ng I wei ghi ng Iwei ghi ng I

    I Wdth Squarel i n Square l upto 200 kg1200-300 Kg 1300- 400 Kg l above 4rOO Kgl

    I Met er I Met er ( Sq. I ( 1 Sq. m cl ( 1. 20 Sq. I ( 1. 40 Sq. I ( 2. 0 Sq.

    rnt

    r ; ]

    I I m r . ) I Space per I m r space I m r . Space I Space per I

    I I I cat t l e) [per cat t l e) [pe r cat t l e) I cat t l e) I

    16. 9 x 2. 4 116. 56 116 114 112 18 I

    15. 6 x 2. 3 112. 88 112 110 18 16 I

    14. 16

    x

    1.9 17. 904 18 16 16 14 I

    12. 9

    x

    1. 89 15. 481 15 14 14 12 I

    GUI DELI NES FOR TRANSPORT OF SHEEP AND GOATS BY RAI L OR ROAD I NVOLVI NG

    J OURNEYS OF MORE THAN SI X HOURS

    Sheep and goat s shal l be t ra~spor ted separ at el y; but i f l ot s ar e

    smal l speci al par t i t i on shal l be pr ovi ded to separate them

    Rams and mal e young s tock shal l not be m xed w t h f emal e st ock i n t he

    same compart ment .

    Suf f i ci ent f ood and f odder shal l be car r i ed t o l ast dur i ng t he j our ney

    and water i ng f aci l i t y shal l be pr ovi ded at r egul ar i nt er val s.

    Materi al f or paddi ng, such as st r aw, shal l be pl aced on t he f l oor t o

    avoi d i nj ur y i f an ani mal l i es down, and t hi s shal l be not l ess t han 5 cm

    t hi ck.

    PRECAUTI ONS TO BE TAKEN WHI LE TRANSPORTI NG SHEEP AND GOATS

    The ani mal s shal l not be f et t er ed unl ess t her e i s a r i sk of t hei r

    j umpi ng out and t hei r l egs shal l not be t i ed down.

    Adequate vent i l at i on shal l be pr ovi ded i n every wagon. Upper door

    si de of wagon shal l be kept open and pr oper l y f i xed and t he upper

    t he wagon shal l have w r e gauge cl osel y wel ded mesh ar r angement s t o

    bur ni ng ci nder s f r om the engi nes ent er i ng t he wagon and l eadi ng

    breakout .

    of one

    door of

    prevent

    t o f i r e

    The space r equi r ed f or a goat shal l be t he same as t hat f or a wool l ed

    sheep and the approxi mate space requi red for a sheep i n a goods vehi cl e or

    a r ai l way wagon i s prescr i bed i n the Rul es.

    Goods vehi cl es of capaci t y of 5 or 4; t ons, whi ch ar e gener al l y used f or

    t r anspor t i ng ani mal s, s hal l car r y not more than f or t y sheep or goat s.

    I n t he case of l ar ge goods vehi cl es and

    pr ovi ded at ever y t wo or t hr ee met er s acr oss

    crowdi ng and tr appi ng of sheep and goats .

    wagons , par t i t i ons shal l

    t he w dt h t o pr event

    be

    t he

    I n t he case of ewes, goat s or l ambs or ki ds under si x weeks of age,

    separate panel s shal l be provi ded.

    Note: t he l at est space al l owance requi red f or t r anspor t at i on of sheep and

    goat s i s gi ven bel ow:

    I Wool ed

    I 0. 17

    10. 19

    Shorn

    0. 16

    0. 18

    Met er l

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I Appr oxi mate wei ght of ani mal s i n

    IKi l ogr am

    I

    I Not more than 20

    I Mor e t han 20 but not mor e t han 25

    I Space requi red i n Squar e

    http://courtnic  ni c  inlsupremecourtltemp/309200332782013p txt

    24  0 2   2015

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    25/32

    Page 4 of 11

    I Mor e t han 25 but not mor e t han 30

    I Mor e t han 30 but not mor e t han 40

    I More than 40

    10. 23

    10. 27

    10. 32

    0. 22

    0. 25

    0. 29

    GUI DELI NES FOR TRANSPORT OF PI GS BY RAI L OR ROAD PI GS I NCLUDES PI GLETS,

    HOGS, HOGLETS AND ANI MALS OF PI GS FAM LY I NVOLVI NG J OURNEY MORE THAN SI X

    HOURS

    MANDATORY REQUI REMENTS

    A val i d heal t h cer t i f i cat e by a vet er i nar y doct or t o t he ef f ect t hat t he

    pi gs ar e i n a f i t condi t i on t o t ravel by r ai l or r oad and ar e not suf f er i ng

    f r om i nf ect i ous or cont agi ous or par asi t i c di sease shal l accompany each

    consi gnment i n t he t ranspor t of pi gs by r ai l or r oad.

    I n addi t i on t o t he above heal t h cer t i f i cat e a cer t i f i cat e has t o be

    i ssued as per t he Rul e 96 of t he Tr anspor t of Ani mal s ( Amendment ) Rul es,

    2001 by t he of f i cer of t he Ani mal Husbandr y Depar tment not bel ow t he r ank

    of Assi s tant Di rector / Deput y Di r ector ; Chi ef Veter i nary Of f i cer .

    I n t he absence of a cer t i f i cat e under sub- r ul e ( 1) , t he car r i er shal l

    ref use to accept the cons i gnment for t r anspor t .

    The cer t i f i cat e under sub r ul e ( 1) shal l be i n a f orm speci f i ed i n

    Schedul e-K.

    GUI DELI NES FOR CONSI GNOR AND CONSI NEE

    Each consi gnment shal l bear a l abel show ng i n bol d r ed l et t er s t he name,

    addr ess and t el ephone number ( i f any) of t he consi gnor and consi gnee, t he

    number and t ype of pi gs bei ng t r anspor t ed and quant i t y of r at i ons and f ood

    provi ded to them

    The cons i gnee shal l be i nf or med i n advance about t he t r ai n or vehi cl e i n

    whi ch t he consi gnment of pi gs i s bei ng sent and i t s ar r i val t i me.

    The consi gnment of pi gs shal l be booked by t he next t r ai n or vehi cl e and

    shal l not be detai ned af t er the cons i gnment i s accepted f or booki ng.

    Fi r s t - ai d equi pment shal l accompany the pi gs.

    Sui t abl e r amps shal l be pr ovi ded f or l oadi ng and unl oadi ng the pi gs .

    I n t he case of a r ai l way wagon, when the l oadi ng or unl oadi ng i s done on

    t he pl at f orm the dropped door of t he wagon shal l be used as a r amp.

    NECESSARY PRECAUTI ONS TO BE FOLLOWED

    Whi l e t r anspor t i ng gr oup of pi gs by r ai l or r oad, mal e young st ock shal l

    not be m xed w t h f emal e st ock i n t he same compart ment .

    Whi l e t ranspor t i ng pi gs by r ai l or r oad, suf f i ci ent f ood and f odder shal l

    be car r i ed t o l ast dur i ng t he j our ney and wat er i ng f aci l i t y shal l be

    provi ded at r egul ar i nterval s.

    Whi l e t r anspor t i ng pi gs by r ai l or r oad, mat er i al s f or paddi ng, such as

    st r aw, shal l be pl aced on t he f l oor t o avoi d i nj ur y i f an ani mal l i es down,

    and t hi s shal l be not l ess t han 5 cmt hi ck.

    Whi l e t r anspor t i ng pi gs by r ai l or r oad, t he ani mal s shal l not be

    f et t er ed unl ess t her e i s a r i sk of t hei r j umpi ng out and t hei r l egs shal l

    http://courtnic n ic inl supremecourt/ temp/3 092003 3 2 782013 p  txt

    24 02  2015

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    26/32

    not be t i ed down.

    SPACE RE QUI RE ME NT DURI NG RAI L TRAVEL - I N TRANSPORT OF PI GS BY RAI L

    No r ai l way wagon s hal l accommodat e mor e t han t he number of pi gs as

    s pec i f i ed i n t he Tabl e bel ow:

    I Br o ad gauge I Met e r gauge I Nar r ow gauge

    I ( 1)

    I ( 2)

    I ( 3)

    I Area

    of wagonl Ar ea

    of wago nl Ar e a

    of Wagonl A r ea of

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I Wagon

    I

    I Less

    th an 121. 1

    Squar e I Les s t han

    112. 5 Squar e

    I

    121. 1

    Square

    I Met r e and

    112. 5 Squar e

    I Met r e and

    I

    I Me t r e

    Iabove

    I Met r e I above

    I No t

    a l l owed

    I Number of

    I Number of

    I Number of

    I Number o f

    I

    I P i gs 35

    I P i gs

    50

    I P i gs 25

    I P i gs 30

    I

    Adequat e vent i l at i o n s hal l be pr ov i ded i n ever y wagon and

    of one s i de of wagon s hal l be kept open and pr oper l y f i xed

    door of t he wagon s hal l have wi r e gauge c l os el y wel ded mes h

    pr event bur ni ng c i nder s f r om t he engi nes ent er i ng t he wagon

    f i r e br eakout .

    t he upper door

    and t he upper

    ar r angement s t o

    and l ea di ng t o

    SPACE RE QUI RE ME NT DURI NG R OAD TRAVE L - I N TRANSPORAT OF PI GS BY ROAD

    Goods vehi c l es of capac i t y of 5 or 4. 5 t ons , whi c h ar e gener al l y us ed

    f or t r ans por t at i o n of ani mal s , s hal l car r y not mor e t han t went y pi gs .

    I n t he cas e of l ar ge goods vehi c l es and cont ai ner s, par t i t i on s hal l be

    p rov i ded at ever y t wo or t hr ee met r es ac r os s t he wi dt h t o pr event t he

    c r owdi ng and t r a ppi ng of p i gs .

    I n t he cas e

    of

    pi gs

    under

    s i x

    weeks

    of

    age,

    sepa ra t e

    panel s

    s h al l

    be

    p ro v i d ed.

    Not e:

    The

    l at es t updat e

    on number

    of pi gs

    wh i ch

    can

    be

    t r a n s p o r t e d

    t h rough r ai l i s gi v en bel ow:

    I B r o ad Gauge

    ( 1)

    I Ar ea of Wagon

    I VPU hav i ng F l oor Ar ea

    63. 55

    Squar e Met e r

    I Number o f

    P i g s

    104

    ( 0. 61

    Squar e Met er per

    P i g )  

    ( 2) The l a t e s t updat e on number of pi g s wh i ch can be t r a n s p o r t e d

    t hr ough vehi c l e

    i s

    g i v en

    bel ow:

     

    Is. No.

    I

    I

     

    11.

    12.

    13 .

    I Maxi mum numbe r of Pi g s per m t t ed f or Road Vehi c l es

    I Ve hi c l e IVehi c l e IVehi c l e IVehi c l e I

    I havi ng s i z el hav i ng s i z el havi ng s i z el hav i ng s i z e I

    15 . 6m x 15. 15 m x 13. 03mx 12. 9m x 2. 0 m I

    12. 35m 12. 18 m 12. 18 m I I

    143 137 122 119 I

    131 126 115 113 I

    121 118 110 19 I

    I Ty pe o f

    IAni mal

    I

     

    I Weane r

    IYoung

    I Adul t

    Not e: - For t he pur pos e of P i gs of al l br eeds , ages and s ex, t he f ol l owi ng

    Space al l owances shal l app l y:

    Weane r - pi gl et whi ch has j us t been s epar at e f r om t he mot her f or t he

    pur pos e of i ndependent r e ar i ng and c ommonl y i n t he wei ght r ange of 12 kg

    15 kg.

    http://courtnic nic inlsupremecourtltemp/3092003 3 27 820 1 3p txt

    Page 5 of 11

    24 02 2015

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    27/32

    Young - Mal e or f emal e pi g bet ween 0. 3 t o 0. 6 months of age and commonl y

    i n t he wei ght r ange of 15 Kg - 50 Kg.

    Adul t - A mal e or f emal e pi g above 06 months of age and havi ng wei gh more

    t han 50 Kg.

    SPECI FI CATI N TO BE FOLLOWED FOR UNLOADI NG AND TI LL THE ANI MALS ARE

    SUBJ ECT TO SLAUGHTER

    The r ecept i on ar ea of sl aught er house shal l have proper r amps f or di r ect

    unl oadi ng of ani mal s f r om vehi c l es or r ai l way wagons and t he sai d r ecept i on

    ar ea shal l have adequat e f aci l i t y suf f i ci ent f or f eedi ng and wat er i ng of

    ani mal s.

    The unl oadi ng of ani mal s shoul d be super vi sed by t he ani mal husbandr y

    aut hor i t i es.

    Separ at e i sol at i on pens shal l be provi ded i n sl aught er house w t h

    wat er i ng and f eedi ng ar r angement s f or ani mal s suspect ed t o be suf f er i ng

    f rom contagi ous and i nf ect i ous di seases, and f r act i ous ani mal s, i n or der t o

    segr egat e t hem f rom t he

    Ant e- mor t em and pen ar ea on sl aught er house shal l be paved r emai ni ng

    ani mal s.

    Adequate hol di ng ar ea shal l be pr ovi ded i n sl aught er house accor di ng t o

    t he cl ass of ani mal s t o be sl aught ered and t he sai d hol di ng ar ea shal l have

    wat er and f eedi ng f aci l i t i es.

    The r est i ng gr ounds i n sl aught er house shal l have over head pr ot ect i ve

    shel t er sw t h i mper vi ous materi al such as concr et e non- s l i pper y herr i ng- bone

    t ype sui t abl e t o st and wear and t ear by hooves, or br i ck, and pi t ched t o

    sui t abl e dr ai nage f aci l i t i es and t he curbs of sai d i mper vi ous mat er i al 150

    t o 300 mm hi gh shal l be pr ovi ded ar ound t he borders of l i vestock pen area,

    except at t he ent r ances and such pen shal l pr ef er abl y be covered.

    Ever y ani mal af t er i t has been subj ect ed t o vet er i nar y i nspect i on shal l

    be passed on t o a l ai r age f or r est i ng f or 24 hour s bef or e sl aught er .

    The l ai r age of t he sl aught er house shal l be adequat e i n si ze suf f i ci ent

    f or t he number of ani mal s t o be l ai red.

    The space pr ovi ded i n t he pens of such l ai r age shal l be not l ess t han 2. 8

    sq. m . per l ar ge ani mal and 1. 6 sq. m . per smal l ani mal .

    The ani mal s shal l be kept i n such l ai r age separ at el y dependi ng upon t hei r

    t ype and cl ass and such l ai r age shal l be so const r uct ed as t o pr ot ect t he

    ani mal s f r om heat , col d and r ai n.

    The l ai r age shal l have adequat e f aci l i t i es f or wat er i ng and post - mortem

    i nspect i on.

    Feedi ng and wat er i ng ar rangement s i n t he Ani mal Hol di ng ar ea shoul d be

    made avai l abl e.

    Whet her ante and post mor t em examnat i on by a qual i f i ed vet er i nar i an i s

    bei ng car r i ed out .

    Ani mal s not t o be sl aught er ed except i n r ecogni zed or l i censed houses.

    No per son shal l sl aught er any ani mal w t hi n a muni ci pal ar ea except i n a

    sl aught er house r ecogni zed or l i censed by t he concerned author i t y empower ed

    http :/ /courtn ic n ic inl supremecourtl temp/3 092003 32782013 p tx t

    Page 6 of 11

    24 02 2015

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    28/32

    Page 7 of 11

    under t he l aw f or t he t i me bei ng i n f or ce t o do so.

    NO ani mal whi ch i s pr egnant , or has an of f s pr i ng l ess t han t hr ee months

    ol d, or i s under t he age of t hr ee mont hs or has not been cer t i f i ed by a

    vet er i nar y doct or t hat i t i s i n a f i t cci ndi t i onto be s l aughtered, shal l be

    sl aught ered.

    The sl aught er house shal l have a r ecept i on ar ea of adequat e si ze

    suf f i ci ent f or l i ves t ock subj ect t o veter i nary i nspect i on.

    The vet er i nar y doct or shal l exam ne t hor oughl y not mor e t han 12 ani mal s

    i n an hour and not mor e t han 96 ani mal s i n a day.

    METHOD OF SLAUGHTER OF ANI MAL AND PROCEDURE

    No ani mal shal l be sl aught er ed i n a sl aught er house i n si ght of ot her

    ani mal s.

    No ani mal shal l be admni stered any chemcal , dr ug or hormone bef or e

    sl aught er except dr ug f or i t s t r eat ment f or any speci f i c di sease or

    ai l ment .

    The sl aught er hal l s i n a sl aught er house shal l

    sect i ons of adequat e di mensi ons suf f i ci ent f or

    i ndi vi dual ani mal s t o ensur e t hat t he ani mal s t o be

    not w t hi n t he sl i ght of ot her ani mal s.

    provi de separate

    sl aught er of

    sl aught er ed i s

    Knocki ng sect i on i n sl aught er house may be so pl anned as t o sui t t he

    ani mal and par t i cul ar l y t he r i t ual sl aught er , i f any and such

    knocki ng sect i on and dr y l andi ng ar ea associ at ed w t h i t shal l be so

    bui l t t hat escape f r om t hi s sect i on can be easi l y car r i ed out by an

    oper at or w t hout al l ow ng t he ani mal t o pass t he escape bar r i er .

    BROAD FRAMEWORK UNDER ENVI RONMENT ( PROTECTI ON) ACT 1986 AND RULES FRAMED

    THEREUNDER:

    Ef f l uent Di sposal :

    The af f l uent di s posal st andar ds not i f i ed under t he

    (Protect i on) Rul es, 1986 ar e:

    Envi r onment

    ICategory

    IParameters

    IConcent r ati on

    l i n not t o I

    l exceed, mg/ l I

    I I

    1100 I

    1100 I

    110 I

    1500 I

    I I

    130 I

    150 I

    110 I

    I Sl aught er House

    I Above 70 TLWK/day

    I

    I

    170 TLWK/ day and bel ow

    l B. Meat Processi ng

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I BOD (3 days at 27: C)

    I Suspended Sol i ds

    10i l and Grease

    I BOD (3 days at 27:C)

     

    I BOD  3 days at 27: C)

    I Suspended Sol i d

    10i l and Grease

    Not e: ( i ) TLWK - Tonnes of Li ve Wei ght Ki l l ed: ( i i ) I n case of di sposal

    i nt o muni ci pal sewer wher e sewage i s t r eat ed, t he i ndust r i es shal l

    i nst al l scr een and oi l & grease separat i on uni t s: ( i i i ) The i ndust r i es

    havi ng sl aught er house al ong w t h meat pr ocessi ng uni t s w l l be

    consi dered i n meat processi ng category as fa r as s tandards are concerned.

    The Pol l ut i on Cont r ol Board may speci f y more s t r i ngent s tandards f r omt he

    above dependi ng upon the qual i t y requi rement of reci pi ent sys tem

    Sol i d waste di sposal :

    http://courtnic nic  inlsupremecourtltemp/3 092003 3 2 782013 p  txt

    24 0 2  2015

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    29/32

    Page 8 o f 11

    As per t he Muni ci pal Sol i d Waste ( Management and Handl i ng) Rul es, 2000,

    the was tes f roms l aughter house, meat and f i sh mar ket s, f r ui t s and

    vegetabl es markets , whi ch are bi odegradabl e i n nature, shal l be managed

    to make use of such was tes .

    I NSPECTI ON OF SLAUGHTER HOUSE: ( 1) The Ani mal s Wel f are Board of I ndi a or

    a Stat e Ani mal s Wel f are Board or any per son who i s qual i f i ed veter i nar i an

    i s aut hor i zed by Ani mal Wel f ar e Boar d of I ndi a may at l east once i n ever y

    si x mont hs per i od, i nspect any sl aught er house w t hout not i ce t o i t s

    owner or t he person i n- charge of i t at any t i me dur i ng t he wor ki ng hours

    t o ensur e t hat t he pr ovi si ons of t hese r ul es ar e bei ng compl i ed w t h.

    (2) The person or the Ani mal Wel f are Organi zat i on author i zed under sub

    r ul e ( 1) shal l af t er i nspect i on send i t s r epor t t o Ani mal Wel f ar e Boar d

    of I ndi a as wel l as t o t he muni ci pal or l ocal aut hor i t y f or appr opr i at e

    act i on i ncl udi ng i ni t i at i on of l egal pr oceedi ngs, i f any, i n t he event of

    vi ol at i on of any pr ovi si ons of t hese r ul es.  

    ~ We di r ect al l t he St at e Gover nment s/ UTs and t he Comm tt ees

    consti t ut ed t o ef f ect i vel y f ol l ow the above-ment i oned gui del i nes. For

    gi vi ng f ur t her di r ecti ons, i ni t i al l y we ar e i ncl i ned t o di r ect t he St at es

    of Taml Nadu, Kar nat aka, Keral a, Del hi , Mahar asht r a and Ut t ar Pr adesh t o

    i mpl ement t he pr ovi si ons of t he Act ment i oned ear l i er as wel l as t he

    gui del i nes i ssued by t he MoEF, and f i l e an act i on t aken r epor t w t hi n t hr ee

    mont hs. Pos t af t er t hr ee mont hs al ong w t h t he Act i on Taken Repor ts.

    Communi cat e t he or der t o t he Chi ef Secr et ar i es of t he above- ment i oned

    St ates.

      J 

    ( K. s. RADHAKRI SHNAN)

    .......................................

    . ,J.

    ( PI NAKI CHANDRA GHOSE)

    New Del hi ,

    August 27, 2013

    SUP REM E

    COURT NO. 8

    C 0 U R T

    REVI SED

    SECTI ON PI L

    I TEMNO. 301

    o

    F

    I N D I A

    RECORD OF PROCEEDI NGS

    WRI T PETI TI ON (CI VI L) NO( s) . 309 OF 2003

    LAXM NARAI N MODI

    Pet i t i oner( s)

    VERSUS

    UNI ON OF I NDI A & ORS.

    Respondent ( s)

    (W t h appl n( s) f or permssi on t o f i l e r ej oi nder af f i davi t , di r ecti ons,

    perm ssi on t o f i l e addl . af f i davi t , documents and submss i ons w th

    of f i ce repor t )

    WTH WP(C) NO. 330 of 2001

    ( W t h appl n. f or di r ecti ons)

    W P( C) NO. 688 of 2007

    (W th appl n. f or st ay)

    WP(C) NO.

     

    of 2004

    (W th appl n. f or exempt i on f r om f i l i ng O. T. and di rect i ons)

    SLP(C) NO. 14121 of 2009

    (W t h appl n. f or di r ect i ons, r ef und of cost s and of f i ce r epor t )

    Date : 27/ 08/ 2013 These Pet i t i ons wer e cal l ed on f or hear i ng t oday.

    CORAM

    HON' BLE MR. J USTI CE K. S. RADHAKRI SHNAN

    HON' BLE

    MR

    J USTI CE PI NAKI CHANDRA GHOSE

    Counsel f or t he par t i es

    Mr 

    Pranab Kumar  Mul l i ck, Adv.

    Ms. Soma Mu11i ck, Adv.

    http://courtnic nic inlsupremecourtltemp/3 092003 3 2 782013 p  txt

    24 0 2  2015

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    30/32

    Mr . Ra j

    Panj wa ni ,

    Sr . Adv.

    Ms .

    Pur n i ma

    Bhat

    Kak,

    Adv.

    Mr .

    Vi j ay

    Panj wan i ,

    Adv .

    Mr .

    R ak es h Kha nna,

    ASG

    Mr .

    Adi t ya Si ngh,

    Adv.

    Ms . Ki r a n

    Bha rdwa j ,

    Adv.

    f or Mr .

    S. N. Ter dal , Adv.

    Mr .

    D. S. Chadha,

    Adv .

    Mr .

    P r a dh uman Go hi l ,

    Adv.

    Mr .

    Vi k as h S i n gh,

    Adv.

    2

    Ms .

    Bi na Madhavan,

    Adv.

    Mr . Ani p Sa cht he y, Adv.

    Mr . Sa ak aar Sa r dana , Adv .

    Mr . M. Yoges h Kanna, Adv.

    Mr . A. Sant h a Kumar an, Adv.

    Ms . Sas i Kal a, Adv.

    Mr . Ani r u ddha P . May ee, Adv .

    Mr . Char u da t t a Mahi n dr a ka r , Adv.

    Mr . Mi s hr a Saur a bh, Adv.

    Ms . As ha G. Nai r , Adv.

    Mr . Chet a n Chawl a, Adv.

    Mr . Sur y a na r a ya na Si ngh, Adv.

    f o r Ms . P r agat i Neek hr a , Adv.

    Ms . Ar u na Mat hu r ,

    Adv.

    Mr . Yus uf Khan, Adv.

    Ms . Ni s hi Shar ma, Adv.

    f or

    Mis

    Ar put ham Ar una

     

    Co.

    Mr . Gopal P r a s ad, Adv .

    Mr . J ayes h Gaur a v, Adv.

    Ms .

    Vi bha

    Dat t a Mak hi j a, Adv.

    Mr . M. P. Si ngh, Adv.

    Mr . Sun i l Fer nandes , Adv.

    Ms . I n s ha Mi r , Adv.

    Ms . As t ha Shar ma, Adv.

    Mr . Mandeep Vi na ya k, Adv .

    Ms . Anj al i Shar ma, Adv.

    Ms . P r a ve ena Ga ut am Adv .

    DAH, Goa Mr . Bhavani s hankar V. Gadni s , Adv.

    Ms . Suni t a B. Rao, Adv. ( NP)

    Mr . B. D. Shar ma, Adv.

    Mr . N. Vyas , Adv.

    Ms . Deep Shi k ha Bhar a t i , Adv .

    Mr . Ved P. Ar ya, Adv.

    Mr . S. C. Ver ma, Adv.

    3

    Mr . Sanc har Anand, AAG

    Mr . Kr i s hna Sar ma, Adv.

    Mr . Ri k u Shar ma, Adv.

    Mr . Mo ha n P r a s ad Gupt a , Adv .

    Ms . Suni t a Shar ma

    Mr . M. Khai r a t i , Adv.

    Mr . Vi kas Mal hot r a, Adv.

    http:/ /courtnic nic inl supremecourtltemp/3 092003 3 2 7820 13p  txt

    Page 9 of 11

      2/

    3/

    24 02  2015

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    31/32

    Har yana

    Mr . Manj i t Si ngh, AAG

    Mr . V. G. Pr agas am Adv.

    Mr . S. J . Ar i st ot l e, Adv.

    Mr . Pr abu Ramas ubr amani an, Adv.

    Mr . I r s had Ahmed, AAG

    Mr . Sam r Al i Khan, Adv.

    Mr . Ranj an Mukher j e e, Adv.

    Mr . S. C. Ghos h, Adv.

    Mr . S. Bhowm c k, Adv.

    Mr . R. P. Yadav, Adv.

    Ar unachal Pr ades h Mr . Ani l Shr i vas t av, Adv.

    Mr . Ri t ur aj Bi s was , Adv.

    Tr i pur a Mr . Ri t ur aj Bi swas , Adv.

    f or Mr . Gopal Si ngh, Adv.

    Bi har Mr . Chandan Kumar , Adv.

    f or Mr . Gopal Si ngh, Adv.

    Mr . K. Enat ol i Ser na, Adv.

    Mr . Am t Kr . Si ngh, Adv.

    Mr . Pr agyan pr adi p Shar ma, Adv.

    Mr . Hes hu Kay i n a, Adv.

    Mani pur Mr . Sapam Bi swaj i t Mei t ei , Adv.

    Mr . Kh. Nobi n Si ngh, Adv.

    Mr . Mukes h Ver ma, Adv.

    f or Mr . Yas h Pal Di ngr a, Adv.

    Mr . B. S. Bant hi a , Adv. ( NP)

    4

    Mr . V. K. Ver ma, Adv.

    Mr . Ni khi l Nayyar , Adv.

    Mr . R. Ayyam Per u mal , Adv.

    Mr . Pr adeep Mi s r a, Adv.

    Mr . P . V. Yoges war a n, Adv.

    Mr . B. S. Bant h i a, Adv.

    Mr . Dhar am Bi r Raj Vohr a, Adv.

    Mr . Abhi j i t Sengupt a , Adv.

    Mr . Kul di p Si ngh, Adv. ( NP)

    Mr . V. N. Raghupat h y, Adv.

    Mr . P . V. Di n es h, Adv. ( NP)

    Mr . As hok K. Sr i vas t ava, Adv.

    Mr . C. D. Si ngh, Adv.

    Mr . Anuv r at Shar ma, Adv .

    Mr . Puni t Dut t Tyagi , Adv.

    Mr . Tar a Chandr a Shar ma, Adv. ( NPl

    Ms . Kam ni J ai s wal , Adv.

    Mr . Sanj ay R. Hegde, Adv.

    Mr . Mukes h K. Gi r i , Adv.

    Mr . Shi bas hi s h Mi s r a, Adv.

    http:/ /c ourtn ic n ic i n/ supremecourtl temp/ 3 092003 327820 13p t xt

    ... 4/

    Page 1 of 11

    24 02 2015

  • 8/9/2019 STATES AND UTs TO RESPOND BY 10.3.2015 SUPREME COURT CASE WP (C) No.330 of 2001 - Abhishek Kadyan

    32/32

    Mr . Ar un K. Si nha, Adv.

    Ms . Hemant i ka Wahi , Adv.

    Mr . T. V. Rat nam Adv.

    Ms . Sum t a Haz ar i k a, Adv.

    5

    Mr . Mohan P r as ad Mehar i a, Adv .

    Mr . Ar u nes hwar Gupt a , Adv .

    Mr . K. R. Sas i p r abhu, Adv.

    Mr . Nar es h K. Shar ma, Adv.

    Mr . Aj ay pal , Adv.

    Mr s . Mani k Kar anj awal a, Adv. ( NP)

    Ms . C. K. Suchar i t a , Adv.

    UPON hear i ng c ouns el t he Cour t made t he f o l l owi ng

    o

    R D E R

    . .. 5/-

    Mr . Rakes h Khanna, l e ar ned ASG appear i ng f or t he MoEF ,

    s ubm t s t hat he wi l l f i l e a r epor t r egar di ng t he s t at us of t he

    s l aught e r hous es i n Ghaz i p ur , Del hi .

    We di r ec t t he Comm s si oner of t he Eas t Del h i Muni c i pal

    Cor por at i on t o f i l e a St at us Repor t , wi t hi n f our weeks , i ndi c at i ng

    t he s t eps t aken by t hem t o compl y wi t h t he var i ous di r ec t i ons

    i s sued by t he MoEF under t he headi n g Br oad Fr amewor k f or t he

    St at e Comm t t ees f o r Sl aught er Hous es i n c ompl i ance wi t h t hi s

    Cour t s or der dat e d Oc t o ber 10, 2012.

    Mr . P . K. Mul l i c k, c ouns el f o r t he pet i t i oner , and Mr . Vi j ay

    Panj wani , c ouns el appear i ng f or t he Cent r al Pol l ut i o n Cont r ol

    Boar d, s ubm t t ed t hat t hey woul d l i ke t o per s onal l y vi s i t Ghaz i pur

    and s ubm t a r epor t t o t hi s Cour t . We r ecor d our appr ec i a t i o n f or

    t hei r k i nd ges t ur e and ar e per m t t ed t o do s o.

    The St at e Gover nment s , whi c h ar e yet t o f i l e t he St at us

    Repor t i ndi c at i ng t hei r c ompl i ance wi t h t he di r ec t i ons i s sued by

    t he MOEF , as ment i oned above, ar e al l owed t hr ee weeks t i me t o

    f i l e t he s ame.

    6

    Put up on Oc t ober 01, 2013 at 3. 30 p. m

    . .. 6/-

    I ( N. S. K. Kame s h)

    I I Cour t Mas t er

    I I ( R enuk a Sadana)

    I Co ur t Ma s t e r

    ( s epar at e s i gned r epor t abl e or der i s pl ac ed on t he f i l e)

    Page 11 of 11