statewide mobility performance measures team meeting webinar june 17, 2013

38
Statewide Mobility Performance Measures Team Meeting Webinar June 17, 2013

Upload: tori-slay

Post on 14-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Statewide Mobility Performance Measures

Team Meeting

WebinarJune 17, 2013

Statewide Mobility Performance Measures Team Purpose

To provide guidance and support to FDOT and the state’s MPOs on mobility performance measures on reporting of internal and MAP-21 purposes

Agenda1:00p Welcome and Introductions McLeod

1:15p Status of MPM Program (update since last meeting)

McLeod

1:30p Travel Time Reliability Presentation McLeod

2:00p Break  

2:15p MPM Contract Vandervalk

2:30p Follow Up From Last Meeting  

2:45p Next Meeting  

3:00p Adjourn  

Welcome and Introductions

Status of MPM

Status of MPM Activities

Final MPM Program Plan

Continued support for MPM – Outreach• Management Presentations• Internal Central Office• D4/D6/Broward MPO/Miami MPO• Outside of State

Production of Source Book underway

Update of MPM table

MODE QUANTITY QUALI TY ACCESSI BI LI TY UTI LI ZATI ON

People Highway

Vehicle miles traveled

% travel meeting LOS criteria

% population within       30 min of jobs 

% miles severely congested % miles meeting LOS criteria

Travel time reliability

% travel severely congested Freeway miles traveled Travel time variability

Arterial miles traveled Delay Hours severely congested

Person miles traveled Average travel speed Vehicles per lane mile

Aviation Passengers Departure reliability

      Highway adequacy (LOS) 

Demand to capacity ratios % population within   30 min drive time 

Rail Passengers % population < X time or 

distance 

Seaport Passengers       Highway adequacy (LOS) 

Transit Ridership Average headway Passenger trips

Pedestrian  Level of Service (LOS)  % sidewalk coverage

Bicycle  Level of Service (LOS)  % bike lane/shoulder coverage

Freight

Highway

Combination truck miles traveled

Travel time reliability

% miles severely congested Travel time variability

Combination truck tonnage Combination truck delay

QUANTITY QUALITY UTILIZATION

People Vehicle miles traveled

% travel meeting LOS criteria

% miles severely congested Travel time reliability

Delay

Freight Combination truck miles traveled

Travel time reliability % miles severely congested

Combination truck delay

MPM Program Plan Goals

Develop and improve measures and reporting techniques

Report on mobility measures for MAP 21 and statewide reporting purposes

Provide guidance on mobility performance measures (MPMs) to State and MPO stakeholders

Stakeholders understand the measures and how they can be used in decision making

Monitoring the MPM Program

Stakeholders are asking for the dataReaction

Learning

Multimodal Performance Measures Source Book is widely used and cited AND Modal offices and districts include defined Mobility Performance Measures in their publications

Behavior

Monitoring the MPM Program

Output • Measures are used in evaluating

alternatives, programming/prioritizing projects within Florida

Outcome • The MPM program makes a

difference in improving mobility

Travel Time Reliability

•Delay•Travel time reliability•Other?

Quantity?Utilization?

Thoughts on MAP-21 Mobility Performance Measures

14

There are two general types of travel time reliability performance measures:

Percent of trips that “succeed”

Comparison of variability in travel

times

Travel Time Reliability#

Trip

s

Travel Time

Success Measure

# Tr

ips

Travel Time

Free flow time80th

percentile95th

percentile

Travel time reliabilityThe percent of trips that succeed …

# Tr

ips

Travel Time

Success Measure

Arrived on timeOn Time Arrival Approach

On-Time Reliability

• Percent of trips made in stable flow traveling conditions – at a threshold operating speed

Highly Reliable• 99+% of trips are made in uncongested traveling

conditions

Mostly Reliable• 95%+ of trips are made in stable flow traveling conditions

Unreliable• Trips made in stop and go traveling conditions

19

Travel Time Reliability for freeway facilities

• % trips with a travel time index < 1.33

• ~ trips under stable flow conditions

• ~ trips traveling at least 45 mph

SHRP2 Project L08 – Incorporating Travel Time Reliability into the HCM

Travel time variability• The variability of travel times that

occur on a facility or a trip over a period of time

4.5 9.5 14.5 19.5 24.5 29.50

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

Travel Time (in Minutes)

Number of Trips (in Thousands)

Simplified curve

Travel Time Index = Percentile travel time Free flow travel time

# Tr

ips

Travel Time

Free flow time80th

percentile95th

percentile

Planning Time Index

Buffer Index

Mean time

Travel Time Reliability Issues

• Peak Hour, Peak Period, Daily?When

• How far from A to B?Distance/Segmentation

• By Roadway, not Origin/DestinationFacility/Trip

• Freeway/ArterialNetwork/Facility Type

• Traffic Ops/PlanningReal Time vs Reporting

• Actual Data/Predictive AnalysisData vs Calibrated Model

23

TranStat’s Source Book

FDOT’s Current Travel Time Reliability Reporting

• On-time arrival• Planning time index

2005-2011

• 2011 On-time arrival

Travel Time Reliability Meanings

Thoughts?24

Break

MPM Contract

Cambridge Systematics Team

Kittelson and Associates

Teach America

Sprinkle Consulting

CDM Smith

GIS Software and Consulting

Reynolds, Smith, and Hills

Texas A&M Transportation Institute

1. Support/Develop Mobility Performance Measures Program

2. Report and Analyze Measures

3. Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility

4. Research and Reliability

5. Other/Future

Major Task Topics

Support Mobility Performance Measures Program

• Plan for MPM Program, organize resources, and develop tasks

• Brainstorm new ideas and coordinate with modes, districts, and subconsultants

• Assist with MAP-21• Training• Travel time reliability implementation efforts

• SHRP 2 L38 the pilot testing of SHRP 2 Reliability Analytical Products– Including review of 5 products,

testing, and recommendation for implementation

1. Support/Develop Mobility Performance Measures Program

Report and Analyze Measures

• Develop Source Book:– Review existing Source Book– Update calculation routines– Report new measures– Produce new General Interest Source Book– Implementation and Outreach Plan

2. Report and Analyze Measures

Report and Analyze Measures

• Acquire mobility performance measures’ data:– Assist in the coordination of multimodal

databases– Summarize mobility performance measure

data and provide documentation of the MPM Program

– Provide data analysis through converting data into useful information

2. Report and Analyze Measures

Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility

• HCM bike LOS model– Update methodology to calculate bike LOS in

the 2010 HCM• Bicycle and pedestrian LOS evaluation– Evaluate bike & Ped LOS on the SHS in

urbanized areas• Sidewalk and bike lane inventory– Account for all bike lanes and sidewalks for

the entire SHS

3. Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility

Research and Reliability

• FDOT Reliability Model testing• Travel time reliability LOS approach

development and testing• SHRP 2 reliability product implementation

scoping• Trip oriented mobility monitoring

framework development

33

4. Research and Reliability

Other/Future Topics

• Asset Management Plan• Bottlenecks• Managed Lanes• Predictive Model versus Real Data• Accessibility Measure• Economic/Benefit Cost of Reliability• Freight Reliability

5. Other/Future

Follow up from Last Meeting

Completed

• Developed 2 tables• Website for sharing material

Underway

• Definition of road network – MPO vs. FDOT reporting

• Repository of data to support PMs• SHRP Implementation in Hillsborough• Definition of district role in MAP 21

Not started

• D5 Case study on commuter assistance

Follow Up

Discussion/Roundtable

Next Meeting

MPM Activities

Meetings

Webinar 3-6 months from now• Possible Topics:• Travel time reliability

details• Calculation of measures• Other

Face to face meeting 6-9 months from now