STATISTICS AND

QUESTIONNAIRE

RESULTS

STATISTICS

TOTAL PARTICIPANTS

185

STATISTICS

PARTICIPANTS BY COUNTRY

* other - no HCP & one speaker only.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

7068

25

1512 12 11 10 10

8

4 42 2 1 1

CTDAY WEBSITE

USERS

1,243

PAGES VIEWS

4,892

Average session

duration

2:08 min.

CTDAY WEBSITE

CTDAY WEBSITE

USERS BY AGE

CTDAY WEBSITE

USERS BY GENDER

CTDAY WEBSITE

USERS BY COUNTRY

ENP WEBSITE VISITS

2477 Webcast views

ENP WEBSITE VISITS

Update in immunology risk assessment

to avoid rejectionCarmen Lefaucheur (Paris, France)

828

Which T cells are important for the

humoral response (TfH)?Estela Paz-Artal (Madrid, Spain)

524

Oncology and transplantation:

immunotherapy and

immunosuppression managementUmberto Maggiore (Parma, Italy)

372

A new approach of assessing

complement activation in kidney

transplant recipients with donor-specific

antibodiesAnna Buxeda (Barcelona, Spain)

210

The kidney does not function any more.

Transplantectomy?Luuk Hilbrands (Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

208

QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS:

AGE

0,00%

5,00%

10,00%

15,00%

20,00%

25,00%

<30 between 30 and 40

between 40 and 50

between 50 and 60

>60

QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS:

COUNTRY

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS:

MAIN INTEREST

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS:

GENERAL

0,00%

10,00%

20,00%

30,00%

40,00%

50,00%

60,00%

70,00%

80,00%

Was the information about the

programme, materials and

location sufficient?

Was the course structured in a

logic way?

Was the course easy to follow?

Do you feel you have gained

new skills and knowledge?

Were the topics presented relevant to your work?

Did the amount of course

material fit in the duration of

this course?

Are the course materials easy

to read?

Do you think the venue was

suitable?

1 Unsatisfactory

2 Poor

3 Satisfactory

4 Good

5 Excellent

QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS:

COURSE PRESENTATIONS

0,00%

10,00%

20,00%

30,00%

40,00%

50,00%

60,00%

Were the concepts and techniques explained

clearly?

Were individual questions discussed to your

satisfaction?

How would you rate the quality of the presentations?

Has your knowledge in the field increased after this

course?

1 Unsatisfactory

2 Poor

3 Satisfactory

4 Good

5 Excellent