statistics of galaxy groups in ultradeep xmm surveys alexis finoguenov max-planck institut fuer...

16
Statistics of galaxy Statistics of galaxy groups in ultraDeep groups in ultraDeep XMM surveys XMM surveys Alexis Finoguenov Alexis Finoguenov Max-Planck Institut fuer extraterrestrische Max-Planck Institut fuer extraterrestrische Physik Physik University of Maryland, Baltimore County University of Maryland, Baltimore County & COSMOS, eCDFS, UDS/SXDF teams & COSMOS, eCDFS, UDS/SXDF teams

Post on 19-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Statistics of galaxy Statistics of galaxy groups in ultraDeep groups in ultraDeep

XMM surveys XMM surveys

Alexis FinoguenovAlexis Finoguenov

Max-Planck Institut fuer extraterrestrische PhysikMax-Planck Institut fuer extraterrestrische PhysikUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountyUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County

& COSMOS, eCDFS, UDS/SXDF teams& COSMOS, eCDFS, UDS/SXDF teams

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 2

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 3

COSMOS

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 4

Challenges due to XMM PSF Incomplete candidate list

Verified against Chandra clusters False detection

Proper threshold ratio for point vs extended source

AGN flux removal Profits from having Chandra coverage

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 5

CDF S+N original

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 6

CDF S+N restored

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 7

CDF S+N diffuse

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 8

CDFS: X-ray scaling relations

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 9

COSMOS: scaling using weak lensing

Credit: Alexie Leauthaud + COSMOS weak lensing team

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 10

Group statistics:Group statistics: COSMOSCOSMOS & & CDFSCDFS

Self-consistent evidence for no evolution in Lx function!Self-consistent evidence for no evolution in Lx function!

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 11

Survey strategies to detect evolution

fxrequired

areaLx

z evol

bias@peak

z off survey

1.e-15

>1 2.e43 >1 1.8 1.9UDS/DUXultraVISTA

1.e-14

>10 5.e43 >0.7 2.6 1.4 XMM-LSSXCS

1.e-13

>200 2.e44 >0.2 3.7 1.1 400d

1.e-12

>10k 1.e45 >0 5.8 0.8RASS

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 12

Strategy of high-z cluster detection

1

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 13

The UKIDSS Ultra-Deep Survey

0.77 sq degrees K=23, H=24, J=25(5, Vega, point source)

Year 1: K=21.8, J=23.0 (86 hours)

EDR: K=20.6, J=21.7 (12 hours)

0.88

deg

.

Almaini et al. 2006

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 14

U

D

S

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 15

z=1.408 cluster

Alexis Finoguenov Statistics of galaxy groups 16

Conclusions

Deep surveys are dominated by clusters with non-evolving luminosity function

X-ray spectroscopy, stacked weak lensing and clustering could all be used to yield the total mass

Deep X-ray surveys extended over an area >1 square degree access cosmological parameters at z=1.5