status of edinburgh wdc global survey data
DESCRIPTION
Status of Edinburgh WDC Global Survey Data. T J G Shanahan and S Macmillan. June 2009 MagNetE Workshop Helsinki, Finland. 2009 MagNetE Workshop – Helsinki, Finland. What We Do With Survey Data. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
© NERC All rights reserved
Status of Edinburgh WDC Global Survey Data
T J G Shanahan and S Macmillan
June 2009 MagNetE WorkshopHelsinki, Finland
© NERC All rights reserved
What We Do With Survey Data
• Letters/Emails sent every year to organisations operating observatories requesting repeat/survey data
• Data received in wide variety of formats and reformatted into common format (Project Magnet)
• Data compared with previous data and IGRF for gross errors/anomalies
• Checked data is published on Edinburgh WDC website: http://geomag.nmh.ac.uk/gifs/surveydata.html
(unfortunately misses out countries do not operate magnetic observatories)
2009 MagNetE Workshop – Helsinki, Finland
© NERC All rights reserved
Rate of Submission to WDC2009 MagNetE Workshop – Helsinki, Finland
One-off Survey Repeat Survey
World
Europe
Receipt of data can vary greatly year on yearSome repeat occupation periods > 15 yrs
2009 Total Records: 21,167 (21,038)2009 Total Records: 126,380 (126,376)
World
Europe
© NERC All rights reserved
World Survey and Repeat Data Origins (1900 onwards)
2009 MagNetE Workshop – Helsinki, Finland
Repeat Survey LocationsOne-off Survey Locations
© NERC All rights reserved
European Survey and Repeat Data (1900 onwards)
One-off Survey Data Repeat Station Data
2009 MagNetE Workshop – Helsinki, Finland
© NERC All rights reserved
Data Residuals (F)2009 MagNetE Workshop – Helsinki, Finland
FIGRF – FSTATION (All World Data)
• Repeat data include the crustal field• Submitted data compared against IGRF
RMS residual: 405 nT
FIGRF – FSTATION (All Europe Data)
RMS residual: 204 nT
© NERC All rights reserved
The Dominant Crustal Source?
• Remnant magnetisation – static with time
• Induced magnetisation – changes with main field
• Is continental crust dominated by induced or remnant magnetisation? (Koenigsberger ratio)
• Repeat station vector data could provide information on the source of the crustal field by solving for the susceptibility
• Does correlation of total field anomalies with main field strength imply dominant effect of induced field?
2009 MagNetE Workshop – Helsinki, Finland
© NERC All rights reserved
Evidence of Induced Field?
Using data since 1900
Using data since 1960
All Repeat Station and One-off Data Since 1900
2009 MagNetE Workshop – Helsinki, Finland
Full analysis requires vector (repeat) data to determine the mean magnetisation susceptibility matrix
© NERC All rights reserved
Submitting Data to WDC
• All data welcomed!
• Data currently received in many ‘formats’
• WDC data stored in PMF but closely resembles MagNetE format (via Gerald Duma’s RS-Enter software) so this format is particularly welcome
• Will soon make the component scatter fields used in MagNetE format available on WDC
• Send to WDC at: [email protected] or myself: [email protected]
2009 MagNetE Workshop – Helsinki, Finland
© NERC All rights reserved
Good and Bad Things About WDC Global Survey Dataset
• Data held in one place in homogeneous format
• Global coverage
• > 100 years time span
• Available on-line
• Actively maintained
• Some (earlier) observations entered twice: for date of occupation and for date of reduction
• Information on method of reduction (sometimes) minimal and not reliable
• Manual intervention often required
2009 MagNetE Workshop – Helsinki, Finland