status of us iter controls effort of us iter controls effort bill devan ... installation supervision...

25
Status of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan [email protected] EPICS Collaboration Meeting Spring 2012

Upload: ngodien

Post on 17-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

Status ofUS ITER ControlsEffortBill [email protected]

EPICS Collaboration MeetingSpring 2012

Page 2: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

ITER is a Global CollaborationMission: to demonstrate the scientific and technological feasibility of fusion energy

Partnership: a unique collaboration of nations jointly responsible for construction, operation, and decommissioning an experimental fusion facility

Cost Sharing:

Caveat: This talk focuses on the US ITER scope

Page 3: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

ITER is a very large project:• Will be the world’s largest Tokamak

Plasma volume = 840 m3; goal: Q = 10

Device is 30 m tall; almost a 10 story building.

• The ITER Collaboration is composed of 34 countries, representing ~50% of world population

• Total construction cost estimated at 13B€ ($17B) [source: ITER web site]

• Controls system very large, too: Est. no. computers: 1,000

Est. no. signals (wires): 100,000

Est. no. PVs: 1,000,000

• First Plasma in 2020• Deuterium-Tritium operations begin 2027

Page 4: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

ITER Site – Cadarache, France

Page 5: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

ITER Tokamak Complex

ITER Tokamak ComplexFebruary 2012

Page 6: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

ITER Controls Responsibilities• In general, each collaborator (“domestic agency”) is responsible for

providing the I&C for their systems

Controls include all H/W & S/W required for system to run stand-alone (includes PLCs, fast controllers, EPICS DCS functionality, equipment protection systems, and safety systems)

“Inter-system” integration done by ITER Organization

• Project activities typically divided up so:

U.S. system “procurement authorizations” written to include design of I&C system, S/W development, H/W procurement/fab, FAT, and shipping

I&C systems begin delivery in 2015

Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities negotiated for each procurement authorization

• Collaborators tend to fill a “primary contractor” role where:

ITER Organization handles EPICS tools development

Collaborators develop EPICS-based control applications

Page 7: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

ORNL7 Central Solenoid

Windings+JADA support

ORNL8% of Toroidal

Field Conductor+JADA support

ORNLPellet Injector

Disruption Mitigation

ORNLBlanket/Shield(Design only)

ORNLTokamak Cooling

Water System

PPPL75% Steady StateElectrical Network

PPPL14% of Port-based

Diagnostics

ORNLIon Cyclotron

Transmission Lines

ORNLElectron

Cyclotron Transmission Lines

PPPLIn-Vessel Coils

(prelim. design only)

ORNLRoughing Pumps,

Standard Components

SRNLTokamak Exhaust

Processing System

US In-Kind Hardware ContributionsCircled systems have US EPICS content

Page 8: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

8

US ITER Schedule• Project has not been base-lined by DOE yet• Here is the schedule being used for planning purposes:

Page 9: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

ITER CODAC Team has been actively promoting standardization

• Integration will be a big challenge for the IO CODAC team

• IO has developed Plant Control Design Handbook (PCDH): Comprehensive set of standards for all aspects of control system design

• IO supplying standard demonstration cubicles to collaborators

• Collaborators must use “CODAC Core System” software developed and supported by IO

• CODAC Core System is available to the EPICS community• Deployed on NSTX at PPPL in 2010.

Page 10: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

CODAC Architecture

Page 11: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

ITER Component Description

CODAC Core System • The ITER standard software tool suite• Developed and maintained by ITER Organization; collaborators 

must use it• CODAC Core System version 3.0 released in Feb. 2012• Currently uses EPICS base version 3.14.12.2• CSS‐based tools used for development and OPI functions

Mini‐CODAC • Used by Domestic Agencies for development and testing• Includes OPI functionality• Includes the development environment for developing IOC and 

OPI applications• A temporary entity; not used for operations

Plant System Host • EPICS IOC • Typically used as gateway for PLCs, fast controllers, & COTS 

hardware• Industrial PC, supplied by ITER Org. to Domestic Agencies• RHEL Linux O.S.

CODAC Plant System Components

Page 12: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

ITER Control Component

Description

Self‐Descriptive Database (SDD) Application

• Used for much of the Plant System EPICS development: PLC table for IOC communications IOC database for PLC communications A basic CSS BOY screen (list of PVs with status) CSS BEAST alarm configuration CSS BEAUTY archiver configuration

• Runs on Mini‐CODAC

Slow Controller • Siemens Simatic S7 PLC series

Fast Controller • Used for fast control applications (when >100 Hz response req’d)• Industrial PC serves as CPU• RHEL MRG real time linux O.S.• Includes embedded EPICS IOC for interface to CODAC• PXIe chassis houses I/O• National Instruments is the primary supplier of I/O modules

CODAC Plant System Components

Page 13: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

ITER Control Component

Description

Other COTS equipment?

• May be a need to use other COTS control equipment for some specialized applications

• Will need to be negotiated with IO

Plant Interlock System Controller

• Used for equipment protection• Architecture is dependent on time response required:

Either a high‐availability Siemens S7 PLC system Or a TBD fast controller architecture

Plant Safety System Controller or Logic Solver

• Used for personnel safety or nuclear safety instrumentedsystems

• Architecture is dependent on integrity requirements: Either a high‐availability Siemens S7 PLC system Or a TBD high‐integrity logic solver

CODAC Plant System Components

Page 14: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

US ITER Controls Organization• U.S. effort is also a collaboration

ORNL, PPPL, SRNL, other

• Project office located in Oak Ridge• U.S. system responsibility ends after equipment

delivery or commissioning at ITER No operating facility left in U.S. when it’s over

• Consequently much of the controls work will be subcontracted vs. hiring dedicated national lab employees

Subcontracted work to include PLC, EPICS, fast controller, equipment protection, and safety system applications

• I&C managed at “3rd level WBS” No centralized controls WBS

Page 15: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

US ITER Controls Progress• US CODAC Working Group formed

Interpret and support ITER CODAC standards among US participants

Includes representatives from each major system

Includes representatives from ORNL, PPPL, and SRNL

• Hired controls integration person at USIPO

• TCWS (including I&C) Preliminary Design Review held Action item resolution in progress

• ECH Transmission Line Preliminary Design Review held Action item resolution in progress

• Other systems still at conceptual or preliminary design stage

• Set-up of test stands using CODAC in progress

• Negotiations in progress with SNS to provide technical support

Page 16: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

US ITER Controls Next Steps

• Continue I&C design efforts Short-term, mainly TCWS and ECH/ICH transmission lines

CODAC Working Group to develop CODAC-support.

• Get through DOE CD-2 Review!• Complete set-up of test stands

For Pellet Injector, ECH/ICH transmission lines

• Set up demonstration cubicle Built by IO to support U.S.

Shipment in progress

• Search for qualified subcontractors for I&C design , software development , and control rack production to ITER Specs

Page 17: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

www.usiter.org

Page 18: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

Backup slides

Page 19: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

Earlier ITER-related Collaboration Meeting talks:

• “ITER tools and drivers”, Franck Di Maio, October 2011

• “Packaging of EPICS-based Control System Software”, Takashi Nakamoto, June 2011

• “ITER Update”, Franck Di Maio, October 2010

• “ITER CODAC”, Anders Wallander, June 2010

• “ITER Core System”, Franck Di Maio, June 2010

Page 20: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

US ITER Controls Scope

• Tokamak Cooling Water System

• Beam Diagnostics

• Vacuum Control System

• Tokamak Exhaust Processing

• ECH & ICH RF Transmission Lines

• Pellet Injectors & Disruption Mitigation

• Magnet cold testing support

Page 21: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

US ContributionTokamak Cooling Water System

~ 1000 MW capacity

~ 100,000 GPM flow

~ 580 psi

Scope: 100% of design, engineering, and procurement

Page 22: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

US Contribution DiagnosticsScope: 14% of ITER diagnostics

Port PlugsUpper Ports (U11, U14)Equatorial Ports (E3, E9)

DiagnosticsUpper IR/Visible CamerasLow Field Side ReflectometerMotional Stark Effect PolarimeterElectron Cyclotron Emission RadiometerToroidal Interferometer/PolarimeterCore Imaging X-ray SpectrometerResidual Gas Analyzer

Page 23: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

US Contribution Vacuum, Pumping and Fueling Systems

Scope: 100% of roughing pumps, vacuum auxiliary and pellet injection system

Page 24: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

US ContributionEC and IC Heating Transmission Lines

24 - Electron Cyclotron Transmission lines approximately 4 km total length• Up to 2 MW @ 170 Ghz per line transmitted 90% efficiency

via evacuated corrugated Al waveguide• Dummy Loads to handle 2 MW continuous power• Switches branch to 24 of 56 launcher feed points• Rotary polarizers control beam plane and circularity• Quasi-optical transmission mirrors for direction change• Manifolds for water cooling of all TL and Dummy Loads• Approximately 2700 assorted I/O points

8 - Ion Cyclotron Transmission lines approximately 1.5 km total length• Up to 6MW @ 40-55MHz ea. via 12” diameter Al/Cu Coax• Each line split into 2 lines to 2 antennas via RF Splitter• Dummy loads for 0.5 and 6 MW continuous power• Antenna output matching via two separate networks

each with multiple motion control requirements• Pressurized forced air and water cooling of TL• Mix of Low speed, motion and RF signal processing• Approximately 1900 assorted I/O points

90°miter90°

miter63.5mm

Page 25: Status of US ITER Controls Effort of US ITER Controls Effort Bill DeVan ... Installation supervision and final testing responsibilities ... • Antenna output matching via two separate

US ContributionTokamak Exhaust Processing

Scope: 100% of the final design, fabrication, assembly, testing, and shipment

Separates hydrogen isotopes from tokamak exhaust

Q2=H, D or T