status on the development of methods for determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using mgbt: 6...

26
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Status on the Development of Methods for Determining Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in California

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Status on the Development of Methods for

Determining Magnitude and Frequency of

Floods in California

Page 2: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP)

AEP is probability that the discharge will

exceed a given discharge in any year.

AEP in percent is the reciprocal of the

recurrence interval times 100.

Example: For the 100-year flood, the AEP is

(1/100)*100 or 1% for any given year. There is a

1 in 100 chance each year that this discharge

will occur.

Page 3: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/106/

Page 4: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

History:

• 1967 Bulletin 15

• 1976 Bulletin 17

• 1977 Bulletin 17A

• 1982 Bulletin 17B

• 20?? Bulletin 17C

http://water.usgs.gov/osw/bulletin17b/bulletin_17B.html

Page 5: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Annual peak-flow data for a gaged station

Page 6: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert
Page 7: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert
Page 8: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert
Page 9: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert
Page 10: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5260/

Page 11: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Regional Skew for California

Page 12: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Expected Moments Algorithm (EMA)

Page 13: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Multiple Grubbs-Beck Test

Page 14: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Regional Regression Analysis

Page 15: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Regression equations for ungaged

sites outside of the desert

QAEP = aAbBcCd… ,

where

QAEP = flood discharge for specified AEP level

A,B,C = are the basin and climatological characteristics

a, b, c, d = the regression coefficients

Page 16: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Basin Characteristics Drainage Area

Basin Perimeter

Relief

Mean Elevation

Maximum Elevation

Minimum Elevation

Percent Lake Area

High Elevation Index

Elevation of Outlet

Relative Relief

Distance to Coast

Average Basin Slope

Percent Impervious Area

Percent Forested Area

Mean Annual Precipitation

Average Maximum January Temperature

Average Minimum January Temperature

Longitude of the Basin Centroid

Latitude of the Basin Centroid

Page 17: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Regression equations for regions outside

the desert take the form:

QAEP = a(DRNAREA)b (PRECIP)c

where:

QAEP is the annual exceedance probability

flow, in cubic feet per second

DRNAREA is drainage area, in square miles

ELEV is mean basin elevation, in feet

PRECIP is mean annual precipitation, in inches

a, b, and c are the regression coefficients

Page 18: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

For the Sierra-Nevada Region, the

regression equations take the form:

QAEP = a(DRNAREA)b(ELEV)c(PRECIP)d

where:

QAEP is the annual exceedance probability

flow, in cubic feet per second

DRNAREA is drainage area, in square miles

ELEV is mean basin elevation, in feet

PRECIP is mean annual precipitation, in inches

a, b, c, and d are the regression coefficients

Page 19: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Updating Flood Frequency Estimates

in the Desert Region of California

• Unique to the western United States:

numerous zero flows/ low outliers

short annual peak-flow records

highly variable peak-flow data

• Standard LP3 fitting method doesn’t

work with the desert peak-flow data

• As recommended in B17B, flood-

frequency estimates are improved by

weighting at-site skew with a more

robust regional skew estimate

Page 20: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Updating Flood Frequency Estimates

in the Desert Region of California

• Because of the problems of the at-site

peak flow data, the at-site standard

deviation and mean were also

weighted with regional estimates of

those parameters in the desert region

• In Gotvald and others (2012), in review,

regional standard deviation and mean

were developed for the desert region

of California

Page 21: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Updating Flood Frequency Estimates

in the Desert Region of California

Regional standard deviation:

0.91

Page 22: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Regional mean:

Updating Flood Frequency Estimates

in the Desert Region of California

Page 23: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Updating Flood Frequency Estimates

in the Desert Region of California

Length of historical period: 14

# of peaks: 14

# of zero flows: 0

# of low outliers using MGBT: 0

At-site standard deviation: 0.31

Page 24: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Updating Flood Frequency Estimates

in the Desert Region of California

Length of historical period: 14

# of peaks: 14

# of zero flows: 6

# of low outliers using MGBT: 6

At-site standard deviation: 1.81

Page 25: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Updating Flood Frequency Estimates

in the Desert Region of California

• The average standard errors of prediction for these regression

equations range from 214.2 percent for the Q50% to 856.2

percent for the Q0.2% annual exceedance probabilities

• The large standard errors indicate the difficulty in accurately

predicting flood flows in this region of extreme flow variability

• These standard errors of prediction are smaller than comparable

errors reported for the prediction equations for the southwestern

United States by Thomas and others, 1997

Regional Prediction Equations:

Page 26: Status on the Development of Methods for Determining ...€¦ · # of low outliers using MGBT: 6 At-site standard deviation: 1.81 . Updating Flood Frequency Estimates in the Desert

Anthony (Tony) Gotvald

Hydrologist

USGS

Atlanta, GA

(770) 903-9310

[email protected]

Questions ?

Nancy Barth

Hydrologist

USGS

Sacramento, CA

(916) 278-3171

[email protected]