status report on the performances of a magnetized ecc (“mecc”) detector
DESCRIPTION
Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector. Pasquale Migliozzi INFN – Napoli. L.S.Esposito,A.Longhin,M.Komatsu, A.Marotta G.De Lellis, P.M., M.Nakamura, P.Strolin. Outline. The OPERA experience Why a magnetized ECC detector? Detector overview and performances - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Status Report on the performances of a magnetized
ECC (“MECC”) detector
Pasquale MigliozziINFN – Napoli
L.S.Esposito,A.Longhin,M.Komatsu, A.Marotta G.De Lellis, P.M., M.Nakamura, P.Strolin
![Page 2: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
The OPERA experience Why a magnetized ECC detector? Detector overview and performances Preliminary evaluation of the impact on
→, e→, e→, →e channels and the corresponding CP ones
Outlook
![Page 3: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The OPERA experience
The detector is being constructed at the Gran Sasso Laboratory. Meanwhile several tests with charged
particles and neutrinos at FNAL are under way
An ECC brick is a self-consistent object. The whole detector is just an ensemble of bricks.
![Page 4: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Summary of the event reconstruction with OPERA
(see Nakamura and De Lellis talks at the previous ISS meetings)
High precision tracking (x<1mm <1mrad)
Kink decay topology Electron and /0 identification
Energy measurement Multiple Coulomb Scattering Track counting (calorimetric measurement)
Ionization (dE/dx measurement) separation e/0 separation
Topological and kinematical analysis event by event
![Page 5: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
A bit of nomenclature
An emulsion plate
Layer 1Plastic baseLayer 2
microtrack
Base track
![Page 6: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
brick simulation step by step
Angular and position smearing; Eff. parametrization; Pulse Height parametrization;
STEP 2
STEP 3 Linking up-down; Conversion to x.x.cp.root files
STEP 1 Event generated with
OpRoot/Geant3;
![Page 7: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The events were generated with OpRoot The smearing parameters are:
Sx=0.4 micron, Sy=0.25 micron, Sz=2.5 micron.
(these value were obtained with a tuning on the data) Eff. measured in the empty brick by using
cosmic muons Pulse Height parametrized by using the data
in the empty brick;
Electrons 6 GeV
![Page 8: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Slopes resolution(Tmicro-Tbase)
Tx-Tx1
=0.013
Ty-Ty2
=0.007Ty-Ty1
=0.008
Tx-Tx2
=0.014
Tx-Tx1
=0.014Tx-Tx2
=0.014
Ty-Ty2
=0.008Ty-Ty2
=0.008
MC data
![Page 9: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
eCHI2P vs PHThis is the results of the micro track slopes resolution simulation
(eCHI2P) and of the micro track pulse height parametrization (bt PH)
bg rejectedMC Data
![Page 10: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
MC vs data comparison
Selected tracks characteristics: The track starts in the 1st
plate; Number of segments [3,15] ; The track is in a box with a
surface of 1.8x1.8cm2; The first segment of the track
is in a cone around the beam direction with open angle defined by the beam width;
Yes
NO
![Page 11: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Base Track angle resolutionBin(i-1)=T(i)-T(1), i>1
MC Data
![Page 12: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Base Pulse and eCHI2P
MC PHMean=26.4RMS=3.0
data PHMean=26.3RMS=3.0
MC eCHI2PMean=1.2RMS=0.9
data eCHI2PMean=1.1RMS=1.0
![Page 13: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
about efficiencies…
Brick not exposed to the e beam
Reference brick eff.
Eff lead MC pionsEff no lead MC pions
![Page 14: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Number of segments followed without propagation (strongly related to micro track efficiencies)
Data
MC without Efficiencies micro track
rejection
Eff. As measured inEmpty brick
(only cosmics exposition)
MC+eff.
![Page 15: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
MC: no correlation between Micro tracks momentum and pulse height by construction
Pulse height vs plate number and
energy loss
Data
MC
![Page 16: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Pions 4 GeV
The events were generated with OpRoot
The smearing parameters are: Sx=0.25 micron, Sy=0.25 micron, Sz=2.5 micron.
these value are the same used for all the “official” productions
NO parameters optimization was made for this set of data.
![Page 17: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
TRIGGER
MC Tx=0.0055
MC Ty=0.0029
data Tx=0.0053
data Tx=0.0022
![Page 18: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Slopes resolution(Tmicro-Tbase)
Tx-Tx1
=0.01
Ty-Ty2
=0.01Ty-Ty1
=0.01
Tx-Tx2
=0.01
Tx-Tx1
=0.009Tx-Tx2
=0.01
Ty-Ty2
=0.009
Ty-Ty2
=0.009
MC data
![Page 19: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
eCHI2P vs PHThis is the results of the micro slopes resolution simulation (eCHI2P) and of the
micro pulse height parametrization (bt PH)
bg rejectedMC Data
![Page 20: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Base Track angle resolutionBin(i-1)=T(i)-T(1), i>1
MC Data
TxMean=11.5RMS=5.3
TxMean=11.7RMS=5.3
TxMean=11.2RMS=5.3
TyMean=11.4RMS=5.2
![Page 21: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Base Pulse and eCHI2P
MC PHMean=26.6RMS=2.9
data PHMean=26.6RMS=3.0
MC eCHI2PMean=0.7RMS=0.5
data eCHI2PMean=0.8RMS=0.8
![Page 22: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Number of segments followed without propagation (strongly related to micro track efficiencies)
Data
MC+eff.Assuming eff.=84.%
(84.% at theta<0.1mrad measured data)
![Page 23: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
An ideal detector exploiting a Neutrino Factory should:
Identify and measure the charge of the muon (“golden channel”) with high accuracy
Identify and measure the charge of the electron with high accuracy (“time reversal of the golden channel”)
Identify the decays (“silver channel”) Measure the complete kinematics of an
event in order to increase the signal/back ratio
![Page 24: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
“MECC” structure
Stainless steel or Lead Film Rohacell
DONUT/OPERA type target + Emulsion spectrometer + TT + Electron/pi discriminator
B
Assumption: accuracy of film by film alignment = 10 micron (conservative)
13 lead plates (~2.5 X0) + 4 spacers (2 cm gap) (NB in the future we plan to study stainless steel as well. May be it will be the baseline solution: lighter target)
The geometry of the MECC is being optimized
3 cm Electronic detectors/ECC
![Page 25: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Electron/pion discriminator à la NOMAD(“our dream”)
Having an electronic e/ discriminator would also allow for the golden channel search!
A detailed study is needed in order to optimize the discriminator
![Page 26: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
How many evts per brick?
Emulsions do not have time resolution How to disentangle events occurred at different time?
![Page 27: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Key points
The MECC needs a time stamp: TT mandatory CC/NC classification needs MECC-TT match
The event density depends on the TT resolution The OPERA-like approach (thick target, 10 X0, and
TT attached to the ECC) does not work With the present set-up it works given the lightness
of the target-spectrometer region The scanning is not driven by the electronic
detectors: the matching is done after event location
![Page 28: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Method for time stamp
TT is placed downstream from the target region (see previous slide)
TT segmentation varied between 1 and 5 cm 1 TT plane per projection Only digital information is used: 2 tracks
crossing one TT strip give 1 hit Optimization performed by using 10000 events
NC and CC for neutrinos with energy 15 and 40 GeV
![Page 29: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
#evts per brick as a function of TT segmentation
![Page 30: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Results
We assume for the time being 100 events per brick.
Possible improvements: a higher granularity TT
![Page 31: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Momentum measurement
Momentum and charge for mips Momentum and charge for electrons
![Page 32: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Methods
Different methods have been tried Slope measurement (used in the past talk) Sagitta measurement Parabolic fit (also used for Kalman initialization) Kalman reconstruction
All methods have been implemented in a single program in order to ease the comparison
NB for all methods, but the Kalman, the momentum is compared at the exit of the target region (beginning of the spectrometer)
![Page 33: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Momentum resolution
![Page 34: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
(1/p)(true –rec)/true
![Page 35: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Charge misidentification
![Page 36: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
A better alignment
![Page 37: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Electron studies (very preliminary)
Single electron with energies 1-5-10 GeV have been generated uniformly in the target region
reconstruction done on hits coming from the primary electron (preselection at true level)
Method: parabolic fit (Kalman for electrons requires some more work)
Given the non negligible energy loss in the target the electron energy at the exit is considered
![Page 38: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
True momentum at the target exit
![Page 39: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Estimate of showering electrons
![Page 40: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Momentum resolution vs zvertex
![Page 41: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
q-mis vs zvertex
Given the true-hit based reconstruction, the quoted charge misidentification can be seen as an lower limit. Anyhow it is a good starting point!
![Page 42: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
The silver channel
![Page 43: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
The old detector setup
• We considered a detector with 4 kton mass (lead)
• Only the muonic channel was considered (20% of the total decays)
• We considered only one event per brick
• Non-muonic decays discarded given the impossibility to measure the charge of the decay products
![Page 44: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
The detected number of silver events
Below 3° the silver channel contributes very little in disentangling the intrinsic degeneracy
What happens with the new setup based on the MECC technique?
![Page 45: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
How many silver events with MECC?
Let us assume a constant target mass: 4 kton We can collect about 100 events in a brick: x100 gain We can search for non muonic decays: x5 gain NB the background for non-muonic events has to be
carefully evaluated; rejection power due to the improved kinematical reconstruction wrt OPERA could be extremely useful
Overall gain: the silver statistics increases by a factor 500 significant contribution to the clone solution well below 3° (studies are in progress)
i.e. for L=3000km at 1° we expect more than 500 (100) silver events at δCP=90° (0°) rather than 1 or even less !
![Page 46: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
What about →e?
NB there are not yet detailed studies available
Just to give an idea (L=3000 km, θ13=5°, δCP=90°): anti-e with the wrong electron charge: ~104
e from oscillation: ~102
We have to search for a few% effect, but the S/B ratio may be improved by kinematical cuts
![Page 47: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Outlook
Study the performance of a stainless steel target Detailed study of the way how to magnetize the
detector Define a realistic baseline for the e/ discriminator: its
choice depends on the total target mass, the TT width (i.e. how many evts per brick), the costs, …
Finalize the electron analysis: the e/ separation and the charge reconstruction
Check the sensitivity to the “golden” (the muon threshold is at 3 GeV!)
A full simulation of neutrino events is mandatory in order to evaluate the oscillation sensitivity and provide the input for GLOBES
We plan to perform a first exposure of a MECC on a charged beam at CERN this year
![Page 48: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
![Page 49: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
The simulation program
ORFEOOpROOT
ROOT
GEANT3
OpGen(NEVGEN)
FEDRAOff-line reconstruction program
for emulsion data
Emulsion digitization is handled by this program
![Page 50: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
A realistic emulsion simulation (1/2)
1. The events are generated with Geant3/OpRoot with a 1 brick detector.
1. The output of this step is a root Ttree filled with generator level microtracks called TreeM (no smearing effects); - [ if a beamfile is used in the output file can be added a Ttree called TreeH with the beamfile informations]
2. The object microtrack is defined in the class Micro_Track (look at
http://web.na.infn.it/index.php?id=527);
2. The emulsion digitalization 1. accept as input a root Ttree file filled with microtracks as defined in the
class Micro_Tracks; 2. this step is decoupled from the event generation so, in principle, the
events could be produced also with the OpSim package or with other generators (Geant4, FLUKA) ;
3. At this step is performed the digitalization of the emulsions;4. The output of this step is a root Ttree filled with digitalized microtracks
called TreeMS (same structure of the TreeM);
![Page 51: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
A realistic emulsion simulation (2/2)
3. Analysis tools:1. A tool to perform the link up-down to take into account the linking
efficiency, this tool accept as input the TreeMS and produce as output a root Ttree (TreeMSE) filled with the digitalized microtracks that survive to the linking up-down;
2. A tool to convert the micro tracks Ttree (TreeM/TreeMS/TreeMSE) in x.x.cp.root files;
TAKE CARE: since at generator level there is no cut on the minimum energy of the microtrack , to make a realistic analysis it is fundamental to apply the link up-down algorithm that has low efficiency for very low energy base track (<5MeV)
4. Some tools to add background are included in the package (it is possible to merge real bg data or simulated bg with simulated events at cp-files level). Of course for people not using cp files it is also possible to merge simulated bg with simulated events by using standard root commands.
![Page 52: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
2 points simulation of a micro-track
10. GeV muons y2
x= x1 +x2 - y= y1 +y2 - z= z1 +z2
)tan()cos()tan()cos(
)tan()cos()tan()cos(
0
0
z
z
Sxzz
z
zz
ySy
Sxzz
z
zz
xSx
y1
z1
x2
z2
x1
z
0
00
2220
2220
)tan1(
)cos()sin(
)sin()cos(
LT
L
zLL
T
L
SS
SSS
SySxS
SySxS
By taking into account that dx and dy are statistical errors gaussian distributed and dz is a maximal error with a flat distribution, these assumptions automatically give the expected dependences on :
“Since the base-tracks are constructed by using the 2 points at base, the same results are obtained for free for base-tracks too”
![Page 53: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Transversal and longitudinal resolution
for simulated 10.GeV pions at =0.7 mrad
SlopLong1=0.037
SlopLong2=0.037
SlopTr1=0.008
SlopTr1=0.008
Smearing parameters are: Sx=0.25 micron, Sy=0.25 micron, Sz=2.5 micron.
![Page 54: Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56814dbe550346895dbb13d6/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
MC: no correlation betweenMicro tracks momentum and pulse height by construction
Pulse height vs plate number and
energy loss
Data
MC