steel and sustainability sustainability your name your title date event location

59
Steel and Sustainability SUSTAINABILITY Your Name Your Title Date Event Location

Upload: elmer-simon

Post on 27-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Steel and Sustainability

SUSTAINABILITY

Your Name

Your Title

Date

Event

Location

Air Quality/ Personal Health

Water Quality/ Community Health

Resource Management/ Responsibility

Green/ Environmental

Protection

Sustainability/ Environmental Preservation

Stewardship/ Environmental Management

THE ENVIRONMENT

GLOBAL WARMING

GLOBAL WARMING

• At the very least, you can think of sustainability as an added feature… at the very most, you can think of it as a long-term strategy for a better-performing, more energy-efficient building.

• Efforts to reduce energy consumption or improve IAQ are akin to a better grade of countertop or more impressive fixtures.

GLOBAL WARMING Short- vs. Long-Term Thinking

Up-front costs are typically 2% to 5% more… but better equipment and materials can turn into reduced energy costs.

Balance: higher-efficiency windows can equal smaller HVAC systems.

There are expensive conventional buildings and expensive green buildings… and there are inexpensive conventional buildings and inexpensive green buildings.

GLOBAL WARMING Short- vs. Long-Term Thinking

“Even if you doubt the evidence, providing incentives for energy efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future—because the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy.”

GLOBAL WARMING

THE ENVIRONMENT

MARKETINGPUBLICATIONSREDESIGN

Non-Residential ConstructionTHE MARKET

2010: down 16% from 2009 and 64% from peak in 2006

$120-145 billion opportunity by 2015 (the construction market accounts for 13.4% of the $13.2 trillion U.S. GDP)

THE GREEN MARKET A Rise in Green

2005

2008

2010

2015 (estimated)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

U.S. Non-Residential Green Building Market

Per

cen

tag

e o

f T

ota

l U.S

. No

n-R

esid

enti

al

Bu

ildin

g M

arke

t

BUILDING IMPACT

Buildings Account For:• 65.2% of total U.S. electricity consumption

• 30% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions

• 136 million tons of construction and demolition waste in the U.S.

• 12% of U.S. potable water use

Domestic Energy Use

Buildings39%

Industry33%

Transportation28%

STRUCTURAL IMPACT Structural Impact

Environmental

SocialEconomic

Sustainable development: “Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."

SUSTAINABILITY

LEED

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design

LEED 2009

Energy & Atmosphere

31%

Water Efficiency9%

Sites24%

Regional Credits4%Innovation &

Design5%Indoor

Environmental14%

Materials & Resources

13%

LEED

100 possible credits plus 10 extra credits

LEED

• MR Credit 1.1: Building Reuse—Maintain Existing Walls, Floors and Roof

• MR Credit 2: Construction Waste Management

• MR Credit 3: Materials Reuse

• MR Credit 4: Recycled Content

• MR Credit 5: Regional Materials

• ID Credit 1: Innovation in Design

LEED Opportunities for Steel

LEED

…or minimize?

Divert…

LEED

1 credit if 50% of site waste is diverted from a landfill; 75% = 2 credits

Construction Waste Management

Project siteSteel mill X%

Fabricator

Per USGBC, the steel fabricator is the final point of assembly and is therefore the manufacturer in terms of LEED Local/Regional Materials credits (unless steel is

delivered directly from the mill to the site).

LEED

Percentage (based on cost) of the total materials package that is recovered and manufactured within 500 miles of the project site. 10% = 1 credit; 20% = 2 credits.

Regional Materials

LEED Regional Materials

LEED Regional Materials

Economic efficiency

Resource utilization

Material recovery rates

Material feedstock source

Manufacturing stages

Transportation methods

Equivalent utilization

Regional Materials – What’s Wrong?

Melt = 100 to 150 tons

Electricity, scrap, water

High demand for scrap

Collected within 400 miles

Multiple

Water, rail or truck

Project basis

1 ton of steel ≠ 1 ton of concrete ≠ 1 ton of wood

LEED

Defeating the purpose ≠ good

FROM FARM TO FORK

Transportation Options

Barge = 1 ton @ 675 miles/gallon Rail = 1 ton @ 450 miles/gallon Semi = 1 ton @ 150 miles/gallon

FROM FARM TO FORK

MARKETINGPUBLICATIONSREDESIGN

LEED Building Reuse

Building Reuse (reuse existing envelope, walls, roof and floor)

1 credit if > 55%; 2 credits if > 75%; 3 credits if > 95%

Summit Place, West Allis, Wisc.

MARKETINGPUBLICATIONSREDESIGN

LEED Material Reuse

Material Reuse (salvaged or refurbished from elsewhere)

1 credit if > 5%; 2 credits if > 10% (based on cost)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory – Research Support Facilities, Golden,

Colorado

Sum of post-consumer recycled content plus one-half of the pre-consumer content constitutes at least 10% (based on cost) of the total materials package = 1 credit; 20% = 2 credits.

LEED Recycled Content

Steel Recycled Content Value =(Value of Steel Product) (Post-Consumer % + ½ Pre-Consumer %)

Total materials value for a project =Material costs of CSI MasterFormat Divisions 3-10, 31 and 32

or 45% of the total cost of those divisions

LEED Steel Takes LEED with Recycled Content

EAF 72.6%BOF 28.9%*

* Unless EAF documented

Innovation in Design

Path 1: Exemplary Performance (3 possible points) 1 point (each) for exceeding MR 4 and MR 5 by an additional 10%

Path 2: Innovation in Design (5 possible points)Castellated beams

LEED

Extra Credit(s)?

Material Efficiency• Reward designs that make the most with the least• Eliminate finishes and expose structure (AESS!)

Design for Deconstruction• Easy disassembly and reuse of materials

• Catalogue and store pieces for reuse• No return to the mill

BEYOND LEED

Then (1980)

• 12 labor hours/ton

Now

• 0.5 labor hours/ton

• 47% reduction in carbon footprint (since 1990); on track for 10% more by 2012

• 40% higher strength (since 1990)

• 67% reduction in energy use (since 1980)

• EPA best performance recognition

STRUCTURAL STEEL Industry Improvement

Sustainable Material

High strength-to-weight ratio – material efficiency

Superior water resource management results in a 95% water recycling rate with no external

discharges (70 gallons/ton)

STRUCTURAL STEEL

Water is Important

1 ton of steel = 70 gallons

1 glass of beer = 20 gallons

1 lb. of steak = 1,857 gallons

STRUCTURAL STEEL

Sustainable Sites

Off-site fabrication, minimal on-site assembly of steel components

Negligible on-site waste generation

Minimal off-site waste generation

All waste is fully recyclable and marketable

Reduce partial loads of steel materials (saves on gas)

STRUCTURAL STEEL

MARKETINGPUBLICATIONSREDESIGN

Sustainable Fabrication

Solar panels and daylighting

Material tracking and documentation

More energy-efficient processes and machinery (reduce idle time of shot blaster)

Cut-length optimization (less scrap)

STRUCTURAL STEEL

STRUCTURAL STEEL AISC Member Fabricator Survey

Criteria• Global warming potential• Acidification potential• Eutrophication potential• Smog potential• Non-renewable energy primary demand

Collected Information• Steel received and fabricated• Scrap generated• Water usage• Electrical usage• Waste disposal• Fuel usage (natural gas, propane, diesel)• Welding/cutting supplies• Chemicals (paint, lubricants, cleaning agents)

STRUCTURAL STEEL

Fabricator impact on overall environmental impact: 18%-20%

Opportunities:

Electricity

“Waste” steel (20%)

AISC Member Fabricator Survey

STRUCTURAL STEEL NREL Case Study Findings

Fabrication Process

• Fabrication shop lighting upgrade would result in an annual 400,000 kg reduction in CO2 emissions and cost savings of over $55,000 dollars.

• Reducing average daily idle time of the main shot blaster would result in an annual 41,000 kg reduction in CO2 emissions.

STRUCTURAL STEEL

Fabrication Process

• Rail transport from fabrication to the jobsite could reduce CO2 emissions by 76%, when compared to truck transport.

• Optimize material cut lengths via expanded coordination between fabricator and designer to evaluate steel sizing options early in the design phase.

• Early review of structural dimensions and connections may identify opportunities for member sizing to better align with the standard manufactured sizes.

NREL Case Study Findings

74.3 KW Solar Electric System

Expected cost savings: • $4,638 in first year• $280,400 (with a 3% annual energy rate inflation) lifetime savings

Environmental savings:

• 2,000 tons of CO2

• 6,000 trees planted• 209,000 gallons of gasoline

AISC Member Fabricator Hamilton Construction

Springfield, Oregon

GREEN FAB SHOP

MARKETINGPUBLICATIONSREDESIGN

Sustainable Projects

No limitation on building life span

Easily deconstructed (bolting)

Minimal, if any, ongoing maintenance required

Allows for large glazed areas for natural lighting

More exposed steel = less materials to hide it (AESS)

STRUCTURAL STEEL

Recycling Aspects

Highest recycled content of any material = 93.3%

Highest recycling rate of any material = 98%

Significant potential for material reuse

Not down-cycled or just recycled, but multi-cycled with no loss of functionality

A true cradle-to-cradle material!

STRUCTURAL STEEL

EVOLUTION LEED and the Codes

ASHRAE 189.1

IGCC

BUILDING CODES

Sustainable Infrastructure Project Rating System

• clear of purpose?

• properly applied?

• consensus-based?

• balanced?

Is it…

Greenwash?

BUILDING CODES

At the state level:

More than 30 states now require public buildings to meet LEED criteria in some way

LEED, enforced

At the local level:

More than 40 states now contain municipalities with some sort of LEED mandates

CALGREEN, the nation’s first statewide green building code, went into effect January 1, 2011.

BUILDING CODES

2.40 tons CO2/ton

1.40 tons CO2/ton

.937 tons CO2/ton

.936 tons CO2/ton

.895 tons CO2/ton

.762 tons CO2/ton

.730 tons CO2/ton

.620 tons CO2/ton

LCA Carbon Footprint

Who’s “right?”

vs.

LCA Life-Cycle Analysis

LCA

Two Buildings

SteelMethodist Women’s Hospital Medical Office Building, Omaha• 151,910 sq. ft, five stories• Completion expected this year• 1,211.49 tons of steel and 5,813.77 cubic yards of concrete.

ConcreteUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center Durham Research Center, Omaha• 280,000 sq. ft, eight stories• Completed in 2006 • 1,940.75 tons of steel and 15,650.41cubic yards of concrete.

Life-Cycle Analysis

LCA

IncludedMaterial production, fabrication, construction, end-of-life deconstruction/landfill for the structural system

Not IncludedUse and maintenance, exterior shell, interior finishing

Functional UnitOne sq. ft of building space

Criteria• Global warming potential• Acidification potential• Eutrophication potential• Smog potential• Non-renewable energy primary demand

Data• GaBi LCI Database (Five Winds)• Site-specific production data representative of current construction techniques

Life-Cycle Analysis

LCA

1 sqft Concrete Bldg. 1 sqft Steel Bldg.

Global Warming Potential

Steel Fabrication 0.1070 0.944

Steel Parts 4.60 6.60

Fireproofing 0 0.0817

Concrete Curing Chemicals 1.00E-03 1.00E-03

Concrete 13.4 9.2

Machinery Diesel Use 0.223 0.252

Transportation Diesel Use 0.648 0.469

Construction Electricity 0.0195 0.0163

Construction Water 1.61E-04 2.60E-04

Landfill: Concrete 2.58 2.00

Landfill: Steel 1.35E-03 1.55E-03

0

5

10

15

20

25

kg C

O2

equi

vale

ntGlobal Warming Potential

Life-Cycle Analysis

LCA

• Global warming potential (kg CO2 equivalent) 9%

• Acidification potential (mol H+ equivalent – air pollutants into acids) 8%• Eutrophication potential (kg Nitrogen equivalent) 9%• Smog potential (kg Nitrous Oxide equivalent) 14%• Non-renewable energy primary demand (Mega-Joules) -1%

Steel Building

Life-Cycle Analysis

Material isn’t moot… but there is more to the picture.

A sustainable, collaborative design process is the key.

LCA

91% 81%

100%96%101%

134%

87%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

180%

200%

Concrete Steel - Average Fabricator

Steel - Worst Fabricator

Steel - Best Fabricator

Global Warming Potential [kg CO2-Equiv.]

Acidification Potential [mol H+ Equiv.]

Eutrophication Potential [kg N-Equiv.]

Smog Potential [kg NOx-Equiv.]

Non-Renewable Primary Energy Demand [MJ]

Life-Cycle Analysis

BIM, Steel and Early InvolvementDESIGN PROCESS

BIM, Steel and Early Involvement

Design-Bid-Build• $2.8 million• $19.44 per sq. ft• 910 tons of steel• $3078.82 per ton

Design-Build• $2.35 million• $16.28 per sq. ft• 772 tons of steel• $3037.57 per ton

Schedule savings: 17 weeksEstimated reduction of steel package carbon footprint: 25%

DESIGN PROCESS

St. Vincent Mercy Hospital, Toledo, Ohio (Ruby + Associates)

Art Iron, Inc. (Steel Fabricator)

OUTSIDE THE BOX Nasher Art Museum, Durham, N.C.

RENEWABLE

Recognize sustainable design and construction is a growing market and movement

What can I do?MOVING FORWARD

Avoid the “popular” issues – be analytical

Understand LEED

Support the development of a balanced, consensus based standard for all construction materials in

high-performance, green buildings

Maintain and provide accurate inventory data

Operate in a sustainable manner—turn off the lights!

Engage in collaborative design with the full project supply chain

THANK YOU!

There’s always a solution in steel.sustainable

^

Geoff Weisenberger

Director of Industry Sustainability

American Institute of Steel Construction

[email protected]

Steel Solutions Center

866.ASK.AISC

www.aisc.org/ssc

[email protected]

Steel and Sustainabilitywww.aisc.org/sustainability