stockholders' derivative action

22

Upload: chris-harden

Post on 08-Jul-2015

334 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Business Law Power Point Presentation about ultra vires and derivative action. Daggett Industries wanted to go into a new line of business but would some of the stockholders object?

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Stockholders' derivative action
Page 2: Stockholders' derivative action

Cosmetic Skin Care Industry

2011 = $100,000,000,000 in profits

1% = $1,000,000,000 of profits

Page 3: Stockholders' derivative action

Objection by some shareholders

Derivative actionUltra Vires

Page 4: Stockholders' derivative action
Page 5: Stockholders' derivative action

Ultra vires is Latin for “beyond the powers of.”

Page 6: Stockholders' derivative action
Page 7: Stockholders' derivative action

Derivative actionUltra Vires

NCGS § 55-2-02(b)(2)(2001)

Page 8: Stockholders' derivative action

Deviation: a change from a customary or agreed upon course of action.

Page 9: Stockholders' derivative action

“In name only.”

NOMINAL

Page 10: Stockholders' derivative action

…unless where a stockholder alleges demand upon and refusal by the

corporation to institute the action to redress the wrong.

Baker v. Data Dynamics Inc.,561 F. Supp. 1161 (1983)

Page 11: Stockholders' derivative action

Norman v. Nash Johnson and Sons’ Farms, Inc., 537 S.E. 248, (2000)

Page 12: Stockholders' derivative action

The corporation The stockholder

WHO SUFFERED THE ALLEGED HARM?

Cabaniss v. Deutsche Bank Securities,

611 S.E. 2d 878 (2005)

Page 13: Stockholders' derivative action

Aubin v. Susi, 560 S.E. 2d 875 (2002); Outen v. Mical, 454 S.E. 2d 883 (1995)

Page 14: Stockholders' derivative action

…discontinuance, compromise, or settlement of action.

Alford v. Shaw, 358 S.E. 2d 323 (1987)

Page 15: Stockholders' derivative action

Brinson v. Mills Supply Co., 14 S.E. 2d 505 (1941)

Page 16: Stockholders' derivative action

Lee v. Wake County, 598 S.E. 2d 427 (2004)

Victor v. Chadwick Mfg. Co., 61 S.E. 653 (1908)

Page 17: Stockholders' derivative action
Page 18: Stockholders' derivative action

Snow Hill Banking & Trust Co. v. D.J. Odom Drug Co., 125 S.E. 394 (1924)

Kerr v. Hicks, 70 S.E. 486 (1911)

Page 19: Stockholders' derivative action

NO!

Page 20: Stockholders' derivative action

North Carolina Attorney General Roy A. Cooper

NCGS § 55-14-30

Page 21: Stockholders' derivative action

In conclusion…

Inform the stockholder to get the majority to amend the articles of incorporation to broaden Daggett Industries’ purpose.

NCGS 55-10-03

Page 22: Stockholders' derivative action