stora enso cmd - presentation by chris de hollander, mill manager, langerbrugge mill
DESCRIPTION
Stora Enso's Capital Markets Day on 22 March 2012TRANSCRIPT
Stora Enso Langerbrugge
Chris De Hollander
Stora Enso Capital Markets Day, 22 March, 2012
Stora Enso Langerbrugge
•Film
•Man bijt hond.avi
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 2
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 3
Stora Enso Langerbrugge
Strategical development
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 4
1932 Start-up PM1
for the production of
Newsprint Wood from
Russia & the Ardennes
1977 Start-up of the first
deinking plant
Recycling capacity:
120 ton/day
1995 Extension of
the deinking plant
Recycling capacity:
410 ton/day
2001 Approval investment € 500 Mio:
- building of the News-line
- rebuild of PM3 to magazine paper
- building of power plant 1
2003 Start-up
of the News-line
and power plant 1
1937 Start-up PM2
for the production of
Newsprint
1957 Start-up
PM3 for the
production of
Newsprint
1997
Restructuring
1998 Merger of
Stora and Enso
2005
VLAR Paper majority
2010 Start-up
power plant 2
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 5
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 6
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 7
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 8
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 9
Collection collection center
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 10
De-inking rejects
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 11
De-inking rejects
De-inking
flotation cells
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 12
De-inking pulp
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 13
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 14
Paper making paper machine 4
Paper making
Press section
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 15
Dry section
Production Power Plant 1
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 16
• 55 MWth output
60-65 MWth input
• Incineration
– Own: sludge of
deinking and
water treatment
– External: waste
wood
• Energy production:
– 60% need for
steam
– 15% need for
electricity
Production Power Plant 2
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 17
• 125 MWth output
140 MWth input
• Diversity of fuels:
– Waste wood
– Bio fuel
• Energy production mid
2010: 2 power plants:
– 100% need for
steam
– 65% need for
electricity
Number of accidents with work delay
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 18
4 3
0 0
5
2 1
3
0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Y
TD
2012
Jan/1
2
Feb/1
2
Mar/
12
Apr/
12
May/1
2
Jun/1
2
Jul/12
Aug/1
2
Sep/1
2
Oct/12
Nov/1
2
Dec/1
2
previous years maximum target monthly cumul
Enjoy the mill tour!
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 19
• This is a
production site!
• Be careful
at all times!
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 20
It should be noted that certain statements herein which are not historical facts. including. without limitation
those regarding expectations for market growth and developments; expectations for growth and profitability;
and statements preceded by “believes”. “expects”. “anticipates”. “foresees”. or similar expressions. are forward-
looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Since these statements are based on current plans. estimates and projections. they involve risks and
uncertainties which may cause actual results to materially differ from those expressed in such forward-looking
statements. Such factors include. but are not limited to: (1) operating factors such as continued success of
manufacturing activities and the achievement of efficiencies therein. continued success of product
development. acceptance of new products or services by the Group’s targeted customers. success of the
existing and future collaboration arrangements. changes in business strategy or development plans or targets.
changes in the degree of protection created by the Group’s patents and other intellectual property rights. the
availability of capital on acceptable terms; (2) industry conditions. such as strength of product demand. intensity
of competition. prevailing and future global market prices for the Group’s products and the pricing pressures
thereto. price fluctuations in raw materials. financial condition of the customers and the competitors of the
Group. the potential introduction of competing products and technologies by competitors; and (3) general
economic conditions. such as rates of economic growth in the Group’s principal geographic markets or
fluctuations in exchange and interest rates.
March 22, 2012 Chris De Hollander 21