strategic plan draft prepared february 2013. agreements (for a 5-year timeframe) “yes” elements:...
TRANSCRIPT
STRATEGIC PLAN DRAFT
Prepared February 2013
Agreements (for a 5-year timeframe)
“YES” Elements: • Site stability, access and usage • Strengthen the Core
• Includes (but not limited to) programs, infrastructure & governance, $, staff, etc.
• Includes role clarity for Board, committees and staff• Must include clear goals and metrics
• “Mosaic in a Bag” (brand, operations, etc.)• Concurrent with strengthening the Core (may include
a Pilot)• Until this is created, develop a low-impact, revenue-
positive way to respond to requests (e.g, Consulting for “mosaic-inspired” programs)
• Financial stability, growth & plan • Includes (but not limited to) MCP, additional profit-
generating programs, Development Director, staff compensation, and other elements (Music? Govt. $?)
“NO” Elements: • Pursuit of Site
ownership• Expansion to other
sites until the Core is strong
• Additional programs or services without clear cost/benefit analysis
• Proactively pursue an Intentional Community
Mosaic Strategy: 5-year Plan
5-year Plan Primary focus on ages 9-11
Add emphasis on younger children
Add emphasis on Middle School
Add emphasis on Youth/High School
Add emphasis on adults (as clients, MCP)
Add emphasis on college students (MCP)
Add more schools and sessions in Bay Area
Add programs outside of schools
Provide curriculum &/or support to others
Virtual/Online support
Focus on existing schools
Fewer students/ sessions
More in-school programming
Add teacher-focused programming
Add family programming
Integrate disabled students
Support student-led work
Alumni programming
Summer programs
Focus on existing offerings
Fewer, more-focused offerings
Bay Area own site
Bay Area long-term lease(s)
Expand/replicate Bay Area model
Pro-active “franchise” model
“Seed” or support multiple sites w/ light control
Opportunistic partnering
No expansion
Become a primary funding source
Build internal business unit (MCP-specific consultants, etc.)
Spin-out as its own entity
Status Quo
Exit
Engage policy-makers, partner as-needed
Establish expertise in teaching others (eg, Prof. Dev.)
Be a resource for other groups and partners (thought leadership)
Minimal positioning efforts
Different Ages
BroadenReach
DeepenOfferings
GeographicExpansion
MCPExternal
PositioningALTERNATIVES
Programs and Services
Mosaic Strategy: 5-year Plan
Values (high is GOOD) Low Mod. High
Breadth X
Depth X
Adults (awareness and $) X
Professional/personal balance X
Idealism/pragmatism balance X
Risks (high is BAD) Low Mod. High
Organizational response X
Access to staff X
Demand for services X
Financial execution X
Bay Area site X
PROS:
• Increasing our impact• Makes us more fundable• Gives us organizational maturity• Staff retention and satisfaction• Builds on what we already do well
CONS:
• May disappoint some who want rapid growth or intentional community
• Currently unstable funding – need to tackle this first and it is difficult
• Challenging to find the right people• Organizational resistance to and inexperience with
research and data
Description:
Growth based on stability. Prioritize strengthening the Core Mosaic model structurally and financially, including a stable, long-term home and development of replicable programs and services. Commit to testing and learning from replication models within the Bay Area for further expansion to other sites and broader reach. We aspire to reach at least 5x the number of current participants per year in 10 years through Mosaic-branded programs (i.e., what we can control.)Implications:
• We need to prioritize and resource efforts to create and implement a robust financial plan, find a stable site, to strengthen the Core, and define a path for developing expansion efforts. We need additional role clarity for Board, committees and staff, and will collect and analyze data to support stabilization and expansion.
• We will NOT grow without first stabilizing what we already have. We will not pursue site ownership or development of an intentional community in this time frame. We will not create any new programs or services without clear cost/benefit analysis.
Defining a “winning” strategy• Advances Mosaic’s Vision and Mission • Meets our Guidance criteria• Addresses each Focus question• Comes out “high” on some or most of our Value criteria• Comes out “low” on some or most of our Risk criteria• What else?
Next Steps & Ownership
Key “YES” Elements: • Site stability, access and usage [Mark, Michele, Lara]• Strengthen the Core [Shivani, Antoine, Serian, Eden, Brian, Michele]
• Including programs, infrastructure & governance, $, staff, etc.• Includes role clarity for Board, committees and staff• Must include clear goals and metrics
• “Mosaic in a Bag” (brand, operations, etc.) – concurrent with strengthening the Core (may include a Pilot) [Serian + other resources]
• Develop a low-impact, revenue-positive way to respond to expansion requests (e.g, Consulting for “mosaic-inspired” programs) [Lara]
• Financial stability, growth & plan [Finance Committee]• Including MCP, additional profit-generating programs, Development
Director, staff compensation and other elements (Music? Govt. $?)
2013 Board Goals• Site Stability: Establish a plan for pursuing a long term lease in the
Bay Area with accompanying milestones. (Stable Home Committee)
• Strengthening the Core:• Create goals and metrics for Mosaic board and leadership review to measure
Mosaic core strength . (Shivani, Antoine, Serian, Eden, Brian, Michele)• Support staff in the development of a three year workforce plan. (HR Committee)• Complete a 2012 audit review, and lay the groundwork for a full audit of 2013.
(Audit Committee)
• Long Term Financial Stability• Create financial projections incorporating workforce plan and growth to
determine needs for financial stability. (Finance Committee)• Create a development plan with clear growth milestones for next 3 years that
supports the financial needs forecasted above. (Development Committee)
• Expansion• Develop a low-impact, revenue-positive way to respond to expansion requests.
(Lara, Erica, Mark, Shivani)