strategies to achieve low carbon growth
TRANSCRIPT
Strategies to achieve low Carbon Strategies to achieve low Carbon growthgrowth
PradeepPradeep Kumar Kumar DadhichDadhich, , Ph.DPh.DSenior Fellow, TERI, New Delhi, IndiaSenior Fellow, TERI, New Delhi, India
Presented At the Seminar onPresented At the Seminar onClimate Change: Opportunities and Challenges for the Climate Change: Opportunities and Challenges for the
CorporateCorporateIndian Institute of Management, Indian Institute of Management, LucknowLucknow
2929--30 March 200830 March 2008Venue: IIM Venue: IIM LucknowLucknow
11
OutlineOutlineKey findings of AR4 (IPCC 4Key findings of AR4 (IPCC 4thth assessment assessment report)report)Overview of IndiaOverview of India’’s Energy Sectors Energy SectorGHG mitigation potential GHG mitigation potential –– Scenario Scenario AnalysisAnalysisCost implicationsCost implicationsCCS potentialCCS potentialBarriers to CCS Barriers to CCS ConclusionsConclusions
22
Observed climate changeObserved climate change
Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, evident from increasing air and ocean temperatures, melting of snow and ice, and rising sea level.
ObservationsObservations
Warmest 12 years:1998, 2005, 2003, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1999, 1990, 2000
Sea-level has risen 3.1mm/year since 1993, 1.8mm/year since 1961.
Widespread retreat of glaciers, snow cover, and Arctic sea ice
Sea-level has risen 3.1mm/year since 1993, 1.8mm/year since 1961.20th century rise faster than 19th century rise.
Attributing climate changeAttributing climate change
Do we understand the causes of the observed climate changes?
Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.
Attributing climate changeAttributing climate change
Observations
Simulationwith natural forcings only
Simulations with natural and anthropogenic forcings
Global Annual Average TemperaturesEffects of observed climate changesEffects of observed climate changes
• Many natural systems are being affected by regional climate changes, particularly temperature increases (snow and ice, ecosystems, water)
• Effects on managed and human systems are emerging, but difficult to distinguish due to adaptation and other drivers of change
• Anthropogenic warming has likely had a discernible influence on many physical and biological systems at the global scale – but difficulties remain with attributing local changes
Figure by S. Solomon
Projected climate changes
• Temperature• Precipitation• Storm tracks, weather patterns• Sea-level• Extremes
• Temperature• Precipitation• Storm tracks, weather patterns• Sea-level• Extremes
Projected climate changesWe have already determined the climate in which we will retireWe have already determined the climate in which we will retireWe can still choose the climate in which our grandchildren will We can still choose the climate in which our grandchildren will livelive
Long-term
Near-term
• Temperature• Precipitation• Storm tracks, weather patterns• Sea-level• Extremes
Projected climate changesWe are committed to further warming even if concentrations of grWe are committed to further warming even if concentrations of greenhouse gases could eenhouse gases could be held constant at year 2000 levelsbe held constant at year 2000 levels
Global Annual Average TemperaturesEffects of observed climate changesEffects of observed climate changes
• Many natural systems are being affected by regional climate changes, particularly temperature increases (snow and ice, ecosystems, water)
• Effects on managed and human systems are emerging, but difficult to distinguish due to adaptation and other drivers of change
• Anthropogenic warming has likely had a discernible influence on many physical and biological systems at the global scale – but difficulties remain with attributing local changes
Figure by S. Solomon
Projected climate changes
• Temperature• Precipitation• Storm tracks, weather patterns• Sea-level• Extremes
• Temperature• Precipitation• Storm tracks, weather patterns• Sea-level• Extremes
Projected climate changesWe have already determined the climate in which we will retireWe have already determined the climate in which we will retireWe can still choose the climate in which our grandchildren will We can still choose the climate in which our grandchildren will livelive
Long-term
Near-term
• Temperature• Precipitation• Storm tracks, weather patterns• Sea-level• Extremes
Projected climate changesWe are committed to further warming even if concentrations of grWe are committed to further warming even if concentrations of greenhouse gases could eenhouse gases could be held constant at year 2000 levelsbe held constant at year 2000 levels
Stabilisation of greenhouse gasesStabilisation of greenhouse gases
Stab level (ppm CO2-
eq)
Global mean temp. increase at equilibrium(ºC)
Year global CO2 needs to peak
Year global CO2 emissions back at 2000 level
Reduction in 2050 global CO2emissions compared to 2000
445 – 490 2.0 – 2.4 2000 - 2015 2000- 2030 -85 to -50
490 – 535 2.4 – 2.8 2000 - 2020 2000- 2040 -60 to -30
535 – 590 2.8 – 3.2 2010 - 2030 2020- 2060 -30 to +5
590 – 710 3.2 – 4.0 2020 - 2060 2050- 2100 +10 to +60
710 – 855 4.0 – 4.9 2050 - 2080 +25 to +85
855 – 1130 4.9 – 6.1 2060 - 2090 +90 to +140
Mitigation efforts over the next two to three decades will have a large impact on opportunity to achieve lower stabilization levels
Greenhouse gas Greenhouse gas emissions/mitigationemissions/mitigation
• What are recent trends and projections of greenhouse gas emissions?
• What is the global mitigation potential?• What is the macroeconomic cost
of mitigation?• What are the key mitigation
technologies?• International cooperation
Between 1970 and 2004 global greenhouse gas Between 1970 and 2004 global greenhouse gas emissions have increased by 70 %emissions have increased by 70 %
• CO2 is the largest contributor to the growth in GHG emissions
• With current policies and practices, global GHG emissions will continue to grow by 25-90% over the next few decades
Mitigation potentialMitigation potential
Mitigation potential:Emission reduction, relative to emission baselines, that is economically attractive at a given “price of carbon”
Market potential:Based on private costs and private rates of returnExpected to occur under forecast market conditionsIncluding policies and measures currently in place Barriers limit actual uptake
Economic potential:Takes into account social costs and benefits and social rates of return, Assumes that market efficiency is improved by policies and measures and all existing barriers are removed
Economic mitigation potential could offset the Economic mitigation potential could offset the projected growth of global emissions, or reduce projected growth of global emissions, or reduce
emissions below current levelsemissions below current levels
Top-down models are consistent with bottom-up models on the overall mitigation potential, but differ at the sectoral level.
Overview of the Indian Energy Overview of the Indian Energy SectorSector
Domestic coal availability Domestic coal availability
Fuels 2001 2036
Coking coal (million tonnes) 27 50
Non-coking coal (million tonnes) 299 550
Lignite (million tonnes) 25 50
2121
Natural gas availabilityNatural gas availability
2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 Domestic availability 84 123 125 125 125 LNG import 25 65 95 125 135 Transnational Pipelines Iran-Pakistan-India 0 30 90 90 90 Myanmar-India 0 0 30 30 30 Total imports 25 95 215 245 255 Total 109 218 340 370 380
Natural Gas availability (MMSCMD)
2222
EndEnd--Use ConsumptionUse Consumption
Industry sector contributes about 25 % of Industry sector contributes about 25 % of India's GDP for the year 2002India's GDP for the year 2002--0303
Industry sector is the largest consumer of Industry sector is the largest consumer of commercial energy in Indian economy commercial energy in Indian economy (40% share of commercial energy during (40% share of commercial energy during 20032003--04)04)
Seven energy intensive industries: Iron and Seven energy intensive industries: Iron and Steel, Cement, Steel, Cement, AluminiumAluminium, Fertilizer, Pulp , Fertilizer, Pulp and Paper, Fertilizers, Cotton textile, and Paper, Fertilizers, Cotton textile, ChlorChlor--alkali are analyzed in detailsalkali are analyzed in details
Accounts of more than 60% of Accounts of more than 60% of commercial energy consumption of commercial energy consumption of industry sector.industry sector.
Industry40%
Transport17%
Residential13%
Agriculture8%
Commercial9%
Non-energy uses13%
Sectoral Energy Consumption (2003-04)
2323
Major industries are already moving towards energy efficiency pathIron and steel: Average SEC of integrated steel plants is reduced from 9.29
Gcal/tsc in 1990-91 to 7.28 Gcal/tcs in 2004-05 (22% reduction)Cement: Specific heat consumption of clinker production is reduced from 1300-
1600 kcal/kg in 1950-60s to 665-800 kcal/kg of clinker at presentAverage SEC of ammonia production is reduced from 13.7 Gcal/tonne in 1985-86
to 9.30 Gcal/tonnes in 2002-03 (32% reduction)
Total Primary Commercial Energy Total Primary Commercial Energy RequirementRequirement
Energy use in BAU
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Year
(mto
e)
Solar +w ind
Nuclear
Hydro (large +small)Natural Gas
Oil
Coal
Total primary commercial energy increases 7.5 times 2001 to 2031(285 mtoe to 2123 mtoe) (CAGR: 6.9%)
Share of traditional fuels to total primary energy consumption decreases by 35% to 4% (in year 2001 to 2031)
Coal and Oil remains the dominant fuels
Share of Coal: 55% in 2031
Share of Oil: 36% in 2031
Share of hydro in total commercial supply is only 2% in 20312424
Energy Security: High Import Energy Security: High Import DependencyDependency
2525
75 222660
1688
285527
1046
2123
27%
42%
63%
80%
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2001 2011 2021 2031
Year
mto
e
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Import Consumption Import Dependency
Fuel Import in 2031Coal import: 1438 MT
~4 times of consumption in 2001
Import dependency: 78%
Oil import: 680 MTImport dependency: 93%
Gas import: 93 BCMImport dependency: 67%
Time trend of Import dependency
Maximum indigenous production levels for all fuels is achieved by the year 2016
SectoralSectoral Commercial Energy Commercial Energy ConsumptionConsumption
Sectorw ise Commercial Energy Consumption in BAU
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Year
(mto
e)
Industry Transport Residential Agriculture Commercial
Trends of Sectoral Shares in Final Energy Consumption (including non-commercial)
40% 44% 49% 53% 56% 58% 60%
9%14%
18%21%
23% 24% 25%45%37%
27%20% 16% 13% 11%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Year
( %)
Industry Transport Residential Agriculture Commercial
2626
Commercial energy consumption from the end-use side increases 7.5 times (in 2001-2031) (CAGR: 7%)
Share of residential sector in total final energy (including non-commercial energy) consumption decreases due to shift towards more efficient commercial fuels
The highest growth rate in oil consumption in the transport sector increases by 13.6 times (CAGR: 9%)
Shift towards more energy intensive modes of transportations both for passenger and freight movement
Electricity Generation CapacityElectricity Generation CapacityGeneration Capacity
74 100175
466
1431
118
137
2769
116
158
125
216
441
795
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2001 2011 2021 2031
Year
GW
Coal Natural Gas Hydro Nuclear
Renew able Diesel Total
Total installed capacity increases by 6.34 times (CGAR: 6.3%)
Coal based capacity will remain dominant (59% in 2031) followed by hydro (20%)
Decentralized capacity will contribute 19% of the total generation capacity by 2031
Total installed capacity in 2031: 795 GW (Draft Integrated Energy Policy: 778 GW, Ministry of Power: 962 GW)
2727
Scenarios AnalysisScenarios Analysis
2828
Economy-Wide Scenarios
Socio-Economic Technology-Deployment
BAU scenario - 8% GDP growth rate (BAU)
Low-growth scenario- 6.7% GDP growth rate (LG)
High-growth scenario-10% GDP growth rate (HG)
BAU scenario (BAU)
High-nuclear capacity (NUC)
Aggressive renewable energy (REN)
High-Efficiency scenario (EFF)
Hybrid scenario (8% GDP) (HYB)
High hybrid scenario (10% GDP) (HHYB)
2929
3030
Total Primary Commercial Energy Total Primary Commercial Energy RequirementRequirement
Increase in primary energy by 20317.5 times (BAU)5.3 times (Hybrid)11.8 times (High growth)8.2 times (High growth hybrid)
Energy consumption in hybrid scenario (8% GDP) is even less than that in low growth scenario (6.7% GDP)
Difference in commercial energy consumption
Between BAU and Hybrid in 2031 is double the total commercial energy consumption in 2001
Between High-growth and High-growth hybrid in 2031 is 3.6 times the total commercial energy consumption in 2001
Total Commercial Primary Energy Supply
2123
1503
3351
285 405 544760
1087
1576
2320
285
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036Year
(mto
e)
LG BAU REN NUC
EFF HYB HG HHYB
620
1031
Fuel wise Total Commercial Energy Fuel wise Total Commercial Energy SupplySupply
Commercial Energy supply in 2031
1176767
2008
1364
757
484
1152
709136
136
136
13140
41
40
41
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
BAU HYB HG HHYB
(mto
e)
Coal Oil Natural Gas Hydro Nuclear Solar, w ind and Biodiesel
Difference in commercial energy consumption by 2031 in hybrid scenario vis-à-vis BAU: 620 mtoe, high growth vis-à-vis
Difference in coal consumption 409 mtoe(1.4 times of total commercial energy consumption in 2001)
Difference in Oil consumption 273 mtoe(96% of total commercial energy consumption in 2001)
Difference in commercial energy consumption by 2031 in hybrid scenario vis-à-vis BAU: 1031 mtoe
Difference in coal consumption 645 mtoe (2.3 times of total commercial energy consumption in 2001)
Difference in Oil consumption 444 mtoe (1.6 times of total commercial energy consumption in 2001)3131
SectoralSectoral Coal ConsumptionCoal Consumption
Coal consumption in 2031
663296
1148
581
285
146
490
253
137
219
231
37091
106
139
160
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
BAU HYB HG HHYB
(mto
e)
Pow er Industry (Process heating ) Ore-reduction Industry (Captive)
Maximum share of power sector in coal consumption across all scenarios followed by the industrial sector for process heating and captive power generation
Coking coal consumption is the highest in the hybrid scenario due to increased iron making through the blast furnace route
3232
Power sector exhibits highest reduction potential, followed by process heating in industry
Difference in coal consumption in the power sector in 2031
Hybrid vis-à-vis BAU: 367 mtoe (55% reduction)
High growth hybrid vis-à-vis high growth scenario: 568 mtoe (49% reduction)
Energy IntensityEnergy Intensity
0.010
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.020
0.022
0.024
2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036Year
(kgo
e/R
s of
GD
P)
LG BAU REN NUC
EFF HYB HG HHYB
BAU: Decline in energy-intensity from 0.022 kgoe/Rs. of GDP in 2001 to 0.017 kgoe/Rs. of GDP by 2031
Decrease of 23%
Even in BAU scenario Indian economy is progressing along an energy-efficient path
Hybrid scenario : Decline in energy-intensity to 0.012 kgoe/Rs. of GDP in 2031 (extent of 29% vis-à-vis BAU in 2031)
High-growth hybrid scenario: Decline in energy-intensity to 0.011 kgoe/Rs. of GDP by 2031 (50% reduction from 2001)
Progression of economy along a declining energy-intensity path if energy-efficiency measures are pursued aggressively even with a high optimistic growth rate of 10% GDP
3333
Analysis of COAnalysis of CO22 EmissionsEmissions
3434
Cumulative COCumulative CO22 EmissionsEmissions
Cumulative CO2 emissions lower to the extent of 25% and 29% in the high efficiency and hybrid scenarios respectively vis-à-vis the BAU scenario
Cumulative CO2 emissions higher by only 8% in the high-growth hybrid scenario vis-a-vis BAU scenario
Cumulative CO2 Emissions Across Various Scenarios (2001-2036)
12.2
16.2 15.8 15.7
12.1 11.5
25.0
17.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
LG BAU REN NUC EFF HYB HG HHYB
Scenario
billio
n to
nnes
3535
CO2 Emissions by Fuels (BAU) CO2 Emissions by Fuels (BAU)
60% 57% 54% 55% 54% 59% 64% 67%
34% 37% 38% 38% 37% 34% 32% 30%
6% 7% 7% 7% 9% 6% 4% 3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036
Year
Per
cent
age
Gas
Oil
Coal
3636
CO2 Emissions by SectorsCO2 Emissions by Sectors
42% 39% 36% 36% 34% 38% 40%
38% 37% 39% 39% 41% 39% 39%
11% 16% 19% 20% 21% 20% 19%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Year
Perc
enta
ge
Power Industry TransportResidential Agriculture Commercial
3737
CO2 Emissions Reduction CO2 Emissions Reduction ScenariosScenarios-- Without CCSWithout CCS
3838
Sector wise CO2 emissions in 2011
641 621 615 621
594 485 436 374
314276 276 276
115115 115 109
16631497 1441 1379
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
BAU 30% 40% 50%Scenario
mill
ion
tonn
es
Sector wise CO2 emissions in 2021
1370 1328 1194 1174
1124689
597 401
686
495499
496
152
153153
150
3332
26652443
2221
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
BAU 30% 40% 50%Scenario
mill
ion
tonn
es
Sector wise CO2 emissions in 2031
2830 2557 2465 1971
2879
1473827
694
1377
874885
786
181
183183
183
7267
50874360
3634
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
BAU 30% 40% 50%Scenario
mill
ion
tonn
es
Industry Power Transport Others Total
Time Series CO2 emissions (cumulative) reduction targets of 30%, 40% and 50% from the BAU by 2031.
Maximum reduction occurs in the power sector by deployment of clean coal technologies. (70% reduction ~ 2185 million mt.)
Uptake of Power Generating Technologies Uptake of Power Generating Technologies at Various CO2 mitigation scenarios:at Various CO2 mitigation scenarios:
Without CCSWithout CCS
3939
Power Generating Technologies in 2011
8054 50 51
3
8 3 0
2326 34
20
00 0
0
6969 69
69
48 8
8
77 7
7
0
40
80
120
160
200
BAU 30% 40% 50%Scenario
GW
Power Generating Technologies in 2021
11255 42 27
5
13 90
114
3830
16
0
49 7396
116
116 116 118
4
11 12 12
21
40 40 40
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
BAU 30% 40% 50%Scenario
GW
Power Generating Technologies in 2031
327
55 43 28
10
146
22 5
157
86
229
0
49
237 298
158
158 160 160
4
15 15 17
21
70 70 70
0
150
300
450
600
750
BAU 30% 40% 50%
Scenario
GW
Conventional coal Clean coal Gas based H-frame Gas based
Hydro Renewables Nuclear
Power sector presents the greatest opportunity to implement CCS. With the increase of clean coal technology uptake from 10 GW in the BAU Scenario to 146 GW in the 30% reduction scenario.
GHG mitigation scenarios at various GHG mitigation scenarios at various CO2 Prices (without CCS)CO2 Prices (without CCS)
ScenarioScenario 20012001 20112011 20212021 20312031
BAUBAU 917917 16631663 33323332 72677267
$ 5/tonne$ 5/tonne 917917 14571457 24952495 50615061
$ 10/tonne$ 10/tonne 917917 14001400 24722472 49894989
$ 20/tonne$ 20/tonne 917917 13831383 24122412 49724972
Units of CO2 mitigated are in million tonnes4040
Carbon Capture Technologies
Hydrocarbon fuels
IPCC Special Report
1. Concept of Post Combustion CO2 Capture
4242
Concept of Flue Gas CO2 Recovery, Sequestration and EOR
Source: IPCC
Fertilizer Production in India
5. MHI’s Scope in a CCS Project
The CO2 Supply Chain
The supply chain for a complete CCS project is complexRequires integration of a number of industry segments A carbon price creates incentives to drive CCS project executionRegulatory framework is in the pipeline
Long term MonitoringProjects
CO2Injection EOR etc
CO2CompressionDehydration
Flue gaspre-treatment
CO2Capture
CO2CreditGeneration
CO2Transport
PowerPlant / Industrial Source Single Contractor
4343
Geological CO2 Storage PotentialGeological CO2 Storage Potential
Estimated COEstimated CO22 storage potential in storage potential in deep saline reservoirs (on and off shore) estimates ~ deep saline reservoirs (on and off shore) estimates ~ 360 GtCO360 GtCO22
Depleted oil and gas wells estimates ~ 7 GtCODepleted oil and gas wells estimates ~ 7 GtCO2 2
UnUn--mineablemineable coal seams 5 GtCOcoal seams 5 GtCO22
Volcanic rock 200 GtCOVolcanic rock 200 GtCO22
Source: Singh, A.K., Source: Singh, A.K., MendheMendhe, V., , V., GargGarg, A., 2006, , A., 2006, ““CO2 CO2 sequestration potential of geological formations in sequestration potential of geological formations in IndiaIndia””, 8, 8thth International conference on Greenhouse International conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGTGas Control Technologies, GHGT--8, 8, TrondheimTrondheim, , Norway, June 19Norway, June 19--22, 2006. 22, 2006.
4444
Current CCS Activities in India Current CCS Activities in India
India is a member of CSLF & IEA GHG R&D India is a member of CSLF & IEA GHG R&D ProgrammeProgrammeIt is participating in the Future Gen It is participating in the Future Gen ProgrammeProgrammeThe Government of India has plans to invest in CCS The Government of India has plans to invest in CCS related activities in the XI & XII Five Plan (report of the related activities in the XI & XII Five Plan (report of the working group on R&D for the energy sector)working group on R&D for the energy sector)Institute of Reservoir Studies is carrying out CO2 Institute of Reservoir Studies is carrying out CO2 capture and EOR field studies in Gujaratcapture and EOR field studies in GujaratNGRI is testing the feasibility of storing CO2 in basalt NGRI is testing the feasibility of storing CO2 in basalt formationsformations
4545
Cost Range of CCS componentsCost Range of CCS componentsCCS componentCCS component Cost rangeCost rangeCapture from power plantCapture from power plant 15 15 –– 75 US $/ 75 US $/ mtmt. CO2 net captured. CO2 net captured
Capture from gas processing or Capture from gas processing or NH3 productionNH3 production
5 5 –– 55 US $/ 55 US $/ mtmt. CO2 net captured. CO2 net captured
Capture from industrial sourcesCapture from industrial sources 25 25 –– 55 US $/ 55 US $/ mtmt. CO2 net captured. CO2 net captured
TransportationTransportation 1 1 –– 8 US $/mt.CO2(250 km transported)8 US $/mt.CO2(250 km transported)
Geological storage Geological storage 0.5 0.5 –– 8 US $/8 US $/mtmt. (injected) . (injected)
Ocean storage Ocean storage 5 5 –– 30 US $/30 US $/mtmt. (injected). (injected)
Mineral carbonationMineral carbonation 50 50 –– 100 US $/100 US $/mtmt. (net mitigated). (net mitigated)
Source: IEA-GHG R&D programme (Report 2007/9)4646
Thank youThank you
4747