strategy day 17 april 2018 - viable citiesmedia.viablecities.com/2018/04/viablecities... · d....
TRANSCRIPT
1
Strategy Day 17 April 2018Viable Cities – a Swedish innovation programme for smart and sustainable cities !
2
Agenda
WHEN WHAT WHO
09:30 – 10:00! Registration and coffee! All!
10:00 – 10:30! Introduction: Viable Cities – updates and highlights!Four Strategic Projects 2018 - introduction! Olga, project leaders!
10:30 – 11:00! The Innovation Radar: A tool for networked foresight and co-creation! Magnus, Sebastian!
11:00 – 12:00! Brainstorming/Brainwriting sessions: Feedback and ideas on !(1) assessment criteria, (2) viability indicators, (3) innovation profile ! Sebastian!
12:00 – 13:00! Lunch! All!
13:00 – 14:00! Discussing pre-lunch results! Sebastian, Åsa!
14:00 – 15:45!Parallel session track 1!Liquid Roadmap and !Knowledge Sharing Community!
Parallel session track 2!Entrepreneurship and Growth and Internationalization!
Olga, project leaders, Magnus, Sebastian!
15:45 – 16:00! Wrap up in plenary with project leaders for each strategic project!Reflections from the program office! Olga, project leaders!
3
Connecting the future to our citiesViable Cities – a Swedish innovation programme for smart and sustainable cities !
Olga Kordas: Updates and highlightsViable Cities Strategy Day, 17 April 2018, Stockholm !
4
Viable Cities Board
Allan Larsson!
Anna Ledin!
ElectriCITY, Stockholm!
City of Gothenburg!
Lena Neij!Lund University!
Catarina Naucler!Fortum Sweden!
Gunnar Björkman!City of Stockholm!
Johan Gammelgård!City of Umeå!
John Rune Nielsen!RISE!
Kerstin Åkerwall!City of Malmö!
KTH!Mikael Östling!
Mikael Anneroth!Ericsson AB!
Ulf Ceder!Scania CV AB!
5
Program management team
Jason Nielsen!RISE !!
!
Charlie Gullström !KTH !!
!!
Olena Tatarchenko!KTH!
!!
Olga Kordas!KTH!!!
Patrik Rydén!Lund University!!
Åsa Minoz!Minoza!!
6
Task force leadersAnnika Nordlund Umeå University
Kristina Mjörnell RISE
Mikael Nybacka KTH
Rekrytering pågår
Peter Kisch Lund
Fredrik Berglund Chalmers
Mikael Edelstam Miljöstrategi E&J AB
Kes McCormick Lund University
Claus Popp Larsen RISE
7
Activities
Knowledge and Innovation Actions!
Support and Coordination Activities!
Research, development & innovation!
Demonstration!
Roadmap & critical analysis!
Knowledge sharing & capacity building!
Policy, regulation & standards!
Entrepreneurship & growth!
Internationalisation!
8
Member days
Strategic activities
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
2017 2018
Focused calls
2018 2019
Broad calls
Strategic projects
Call #3 Call #1
Programme start 1/9
Strategy day 9/11 General Assembly+ strategy day 16-17/4
Call #2 - Demonstration
Viable Cities Outlook 6/12
Inspiration day + strategy day 6-7/9
Viable Cities: Activities 2018
9
”Save-the date”, 2018§ 23 May (10-10:45): Viable Cities workshop, Nordic Clean Energy Week/Mission Innovation; Malmö. !§ 1-8 July: Almedalen:!
§ 2 July 16:00, Seminar & mingle, Teaterskeppet!§ 5 July: Breakfast & reflections!
§ 6 September: Viable Cities Inspiration day – New projects and match-making, Gothenburg!§ 7 September: Strategy Dag, Gothenburg. !§ 13-15 November. Smart Cities World Expo, Barcelona:!
§ Nordic Pavilion, booth & mingle!§ Speeches & networking!
§ Information days for call #3: !§ 23 October: Stockholm !§ 7 November: Gothenburg!§ 8 November: Malmö!§ 9 November: Umeå!
§ 4 December: Viable Cities Outlook, Result Dag for strategic projects & mingle !!
10
Open call #1, 2017: Energy and climate transition through smart sustainable cities .
11
Research, Innovation, Demonstration§ Meet energy and climate challenges
in cities!§ Use digitalisation and citizens’
engagement !§ Cross-sectorial and transdisciplinary!§ Based on citizens’ needs and deliver
benefits for citizens!§ Facilitate gender equality and
diversity!§ Enable scalability, replicability and
interoperability!
12
Highlights
§ SWOT analysis on artificial intelligence and machine learning!§ A joint Nordic call: (NordForsk/Viable Cities), Jan 2019!§ Report from the meetings at European Commission and European
Parliament on Smart and Sustainable Cities (Viable Cities), 9-10 April 2018: !§ Cities are important actors!!§ Fragmentation/lack of coordination: One stop-shop for cities, Urbis !§ Report by M.Mazzucato” Mission-Oriented Research & Innovation in the
European Union” – Mission: 100 Carbon neutral cities by 2030!§ DG Research and Innovation on FP9: “we should learn from Viable Cities”!§ Europe-day, Viable Cities Europe, Dec 2018 (tbc)!
13
Viable Cities inspires:
M.Mazzucato ”Mission-Oriented Research & Innovation in the European Union”, EC ISBN 978-92-79-79832-0
§ Quadruple-helix partnership, including civil society!
§ Involvement of municipalities!§ Cross-sectoral co-creation!§ People-centred approach!§ Long-term!§ Holistic perspective, SDGs!§ Portfolio approach!§ Concrete examples (e.g.
Hammarby Sjöstad, lighthouse projects etc)!
§ Networked foresight!
14
Strategic projects, 2018
A. Roadmap & Follow up – critical analysis !1. Viable Cities Liquid Roadmap 2050 !2. Pre-study: Viable Cities Index !3. Pre-study: Viable Cities longitudinal follow-up framework !
B. Knowledge sharing and Capacity building!1. Viable Cities knowledge sharing community !2. Pre-study: Viable Cities strategy for inclusion, gender and! diversity !
C. Policy, regulations and standards!1. Pre-study: Viable Cities Standardisation strategy !
D. Entrepreneurship and growth!1. Viable Cities entrepreneurship and growth !2. Pre-study: A framework for scalability analysis !
E. Internationalisation!1. Viable Cities strategy for internationalisation !
!
Roadmap & critical analysis!
Knowledge sharing & capacity building!
Policy, regulation & standards!
Entrepreneurship & growth!
Internationalisation!
15
Internationalisation
Viable Cities strategic projects 2018
Liquid Roadmap
Knowledge sharing Entrepreneurship
16
Viable Cities strategic projects
InternationalisationLiquid Roadmap
Knowledge sharing EntrepreneurshipMikael !Edelstam!
17
”How can we know if we are an advanced civilisation if we don’t explore other
galaxies? Who knows what’s out there!” Star Trek
18
Activities in 2018!§ Analysis of internationalisation
activities/initiatives, opportunities, challenges and needs!
§ Analysis of potential approach for scanning/outlooks/intelligence!
§ Co-definition of top prorities!§ Pre-studies e.g. intelligence/scanning
function, globabl excellence network, international positioning and visibility !
Persons involved (project team)!§ Nine organisations comprise project
team to lead and drive the project!§ Budget!§ 1,7 MSEK!
§ Establish conditions for a stronger internationalisation of the Swedish innovation ecosystem within smart sustainable cities, based on a two-way process approach!
Internationalisation
19
Viable Cities strategic projects
InternationalisationLiquid Roadmap
Knowledge sharing Entrepreneurship
Jason !Nielsen!
20
Activities in 2018!§ Analysis of innovation ecosystems,
actors needs and role of Viable Cities and it’s members!
§ Pre-studies e.g. innovation cluster, match making function, entrepreneurial idea support function!
Persons involved (project team tbc)!§ Eight organisations comprise the
project team to lead and drive the project!
Budget!§ 1 MSEK!
§ Contribute to sustainable growth by strengthening the innovation ecosystem for smart sustainable cities, including; !§ Leveraging the network capital of
Viable Cities members!§ Developing linkages and
collaborations with important and complimentary programs, initiatives and support organisations!
Entrepreneurship and Growth
21
Entrepreneurship and growth
Ecosystem mapping example
22
Viable Cities strategic projects
InternationalisationLiquid Roadmap
Knowledge sharing Entrepreneurship
Charlie!Gullström!
23
Activities in 2018!§ Establish expert network !§ Map best practices
internationally!§ Visualize project portfolio !Persons involved!§ Nine development leaders!Budget!§ 1,5 MSEK!
§ will develop from 2018 to 2029!§ enable world leading
innovation capabilities of Swedish cities together with stakeholders for energy and climate transition !
§ interactive process of knowledge sharing for accelerating learning, leading change and working together!
§ creation of a vibrant arena for Viable Cites stakeholders!
Knowledge sharing
24
Viable Cities strategic projects
InternationalisationLiquid Roadmap
Knowledge sharing EntrepreneurshipOlga!
Kordas!
25
Viable Cities Liquid Roadmap 2050: Purpose1. Demonstrate how Sweden can lead
development for smart sustainable cities !2. Deliver and employ an interactive, flexible,
and dynamic co-creation tool clearly describing tangible outputs that realise the programme goals!
3. Steer strategy work inside Viable Cities and inspire strategy work among the Viable Cities Transition Arena participants!
26
Save-the-date
§ Workshop 1: May 14!
§ Workshop 2: June 1!
§ Workshops 3,4: Autumn 2018!
!
27
Viable Cities Innovation RadarA tool for networked foresight, portfolio management and co-creationMagnus Boman, Sebastian Knab !Stockholm, 17 April 2018 !!
28
Starting Point. Addressing the challenges of a partner-driven innovation program.
› Creating and maintaining a shared vision and future outlook.
› Leveraging distributed knowledge about future trends and developments.
UNDERSTANDING
› Harnessing complementary assets and capabilities.
› Fostering collaboration for systemic innovation.
ACTING
› Steering a diverse project portfolio and ensuring goal-orientation.
› Defining, monitoring and communicating strategic priorities and directions.
PLANNING
NETWORKED FORESIGHT
INNOVATION CO-CREATION
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
29
VIDEO https://gsmaradar.com/user/login
30
The Innovation Radar.A tool for networked foresight, portfolio management and co-creation
From Radar screen
to profile
ActWatchIgnore
Recommendation Fit with existing capabilitiesLimited
Moderate
High
Very High
RelevanceLimited
Moderate
High
Very high
Limited
Moderate
High
Very high
Strategic fit
Assessment along customized dimensions
RADAR SEGMENTS
TIME HORIZON
INNOVATION OPPORTUNITIES
31
Framework Development.Key elements
INNOVATION PROFILES
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
RADAR SCREEN
ONLINE PLATFORM & PROCESS
32
Framework Development.Key elements
INNOVATION PROFILES
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
RADAR SCREEN
ONLINE PLATFORM & PROCESS
33
Viable CitiesInnovation Radar Screen.
34
Framework Development.Key elements
INNOVATION PROFILES
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
RADAR SCREEN
ONLINE PLATFORM & PROCESS
35
Assessment Criteria.Combining attractiveness/addressability and external/internal enables portfolio management.
ADDRESSABILITY ATTRACTIVENESS EX
TERN
AL
INTE
RNA
L
DESIRABILITY Is the innovation
generally desirable? How much demand
would there be?
VIABILITY Does the innovation
fit with Viable Cities’ goals? How much does the innovation
contribute to the viability of cities?
CAPABILITY Does the innovation fit
with Viable Cities’ capabilities? Can the innovation be expected
to emerge from within Viable Cities?
FEASIBILITY Is the innovation
generally feasible? When can the innovation be expected to be available?
36
Attractiveness
Very high
High
Moderate
Filled Radar Screen.Display options Driverless ride sharing
(free floating)
Goods transfer hub
Connected BMS
Wireless electricity
Shared working spaces
Neighborhood shared goods
Free floating car sharing
Innovation type
Service
Product
Business model
Technology Limited
VR business meetings
Waste tracking
Solar roof tiles
Rainwater recycling
Power- window
Driverless ride sharing (fenced areas)
Inter-modal mobility service
Power sharing micro-grids
Topic cluster
Active cluster: Shared Economy
37
Framework Development.Key elements
INNOVATION PROFILES
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
RADAR SCREEN
ONLINE PLATFORM & PROCESS
What resources are required to realize this innovation?
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT TYPE PROJECT FORM THEME
CONTACT
Via
ble
Citi
es
fun
de
d
Via
ble
Citi
es
me
mb
ers
Exte
rna
l
Pre
stu
dy
Re
sea
rch
p
roje
ct
Inn
ova
tion
p
roje
ct
De
mo
nst
ratio
n
pro
jec
t
Test
be
ds
an
d
livin
g la
bs
Inn
ova
tion
&
Entr
ep
ren
eu
rs.
Fin
an
cin
g a
nd
Bu
sine
ss M
od
els
Go
vern
an
ce
Inte
llig
en
ce
, Se
cu
rity,
Eth
ics
OPPORTUNTIES THREATS
INDUSTRY
PUBLIC
ACADEMIA
CIVIL SOCIETY
OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENT
EXISTING PROJECTS
IMPACT
DESCRIPTION
ATTRACTIVENESS ADDRESSABILITY
DESIRABILITY
Limited Moderate High Very high
VIABILITY
Limited Very high
High Moderate
FEASIBILITY
Limited Moderate High Very high
CAPABILITY
Limited Very high
High Moderate
REQUIRED RESOURCES
EXTE
RNA
L I N
TERN
AL
TECHNOLOGIES
CAPABILITIES
TITLE
SUGGESTED BY
INNOVATION TYPE
CONTRIBUTION TO ENERGY AND CLIMATE TRANSITIONS How does the innovation contribute to Viable Cities’ vision to “inspire and take a leading role in energy and climate transitions”?
REALIZATION TIME
Describe the innovation in 20-30 words.
Technology Business model
Product Social
Process Service 0-5 y 10-15 y
5-10 y 15+ y
How desirable is the innovation? How much demand is there?
How feasible is the innovation? How soon could it be available?
To what extent does the innovation fit with Viable Cities’ goals?
To what extent does the innovation fit with Viable Cities’ capabilities?
Who is the contact person for this project?
Please list projects that contribute or relate to this innovation.
What resources are required to realize this innovation?
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT TYPE PROJECT FORM THEME
CONTACT
Via
ble
Citi
es
fun
de
d
Via
ble
Citi
es
me
mb
ers
Exte
rna
l
Pre
stu
dy
Re
sea
rch
p
roje
ct
Inn
ova
tion
p
roje
ct
De
mo
nst
ratio
n
pro
jec
t
Test
be
ds
an
d
livin
g la
bs
Inn
ova
tion
&
Entr
ep
ren
eu
rs.
Fin
an
cin
g a
nd
Bu
sine
ss M
od
els
Go
vern
an
ce
Inte
llig
en
ce
, Se
cu
rity,
Eth
ics
OPPORTUNTIES THREATS
INDUSTRY
PUBLIC
ACADEMIA
CIVIL SOCIETY
OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENT
EXISTING PROJECTS
IMPACT
DESCRIPTION
ATTRACTIVENESS ADDRESSABILITY
DESIRABILITY
Limited Moderate High Very high
VIABILITY
Limited Very high
High Moderate
FEASIBILITY
Limited Moderate High Very high
CAPABILITY
Limited Very high
High Moderate
REQUIRED RESOURCES
EXTE
RNA
L I N
TERN
AL
TECHNOLOGIES
CAPABILITIES
TITLE
SUGGESTED BY
INNOVATION TYPE
CONTRIBUTION TO ENERGY AND CLIMATE TRANSITIONS How does the innovation contribute to Viable Cities’ vision to “inspire and take a leading role in energy and climate transitions”?
REALIZATION TIME
Describe the innovation in 20-30 words.
Technology Business model
Product Social
Process Service 0-5 y 10-15 y
5-10 y 15+ y
How desirable is the innovation? How much demand is there?
How feasible is the innovation? How soon could it be available?
To what extent does the innovation fit with Viable Cities’ goals?
To what extent does the innovation fit with Viable Cities’ capabilities?
Who is the contact person for this project?
Please list projects that contribute or relate to this innovation.
DRIVERLESS CAR SHARING
F. van Doesum
Smart systems calculate the best routes between A and B, while also picking up people, reducing the energy utilisation. With electric drive technology, there is no emission.
• AI • Image/Object recognition • Route planning
• Information sharing
• Fleet Management • IT Infrastructure and
Management
In this business, driverless cars are used for transporting multiple people between location A to B.
• Digitalising the transportation industry
E-car sharing (HORIZON 2020)
Collective Travel (CIVITAS)
NAVYA (EIT Digital)
• Complements the public transportation
• To study and enhance the intelligence, functionality and impact of driverless and sharing.
• Reduced accidents and dangerous incidents.
• Lack of infrastructure to support digitalisation
• Reduces the role of public transportation
• Requires funds • Competing projects and
recurring projects in nature
• Lack of regulations to govern the development, implementation and use
X
X
X
X X X X X X
X X
What resources are required to realize this innovation?
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT TYPE PROJECT FORM THEME
CONTACT
Via
ble
Citi
es
fun
de
d
Via
ble
Citi
es
me
mb
ers
Exte
rna
l
Pre
stu
dy
Re
sea
rch
p
roje
ct
Inn
ova
tion
p
roje
ct
De
mo
nst
ratio
n
pro
jec
t
Test
be
ds
an
d
livin
g la
bs
Inn
ova
tion
&
Entr
ep
ren
eu
rs.
Fin
an
cin
g a
nd
Bu
sine
ss M
od
els
Go
vern
an
ce
Inte
llig
en
ce
, Se
cu
rity,
Eth
ics
OPPORTUNTIES THREATS
INDUSTRY
PUBLIC
ACADEMIA
CIVIL SOCIETY
OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENT
EXISTING PROJECTS
IMPACT
DESCRIPTION
ATTRACTIVENESS ADDRESSABILITY
DESIRABILITY
Limited Moderate High Very high
VIABILITY
Limited Very high
High Moderate
FEASIBILITY
Limited Moderate High Very high
CAPABILITY
Limited Very high
High Moderate
REQUIRED RESOURCES
EXTE
RNA
L I N
TERN
AL
TECHNOLOGIES
CAPABILITIES
TITLE
SUGGESTED BY
INNOVATION TYPE
CONTRIBUTION TO ENERGY AND CLIMATE TRANSITIONS How does the innovation contribute to Viable Cities’ vision to “inspire and take a leading role in energy and climate transitions”?
REALIZATION TIME
Describe the innovation in 20-30 words.
Technology Business model
Product Social
Process Service 0-5 y 10-15 y
5-10 y 15+ y
How desirable is the innovation? How much demand is there?
How feasible is the innovation? How soon could it be available?
To what extent does the innovation fit with Viable Cities’ goals?
To what extent does the innovation fit with Viable Cities’ capabilities?
Who is the contact person for this project?
Please list projects that contribute or relate to this innovation.
OBJECT RECOGNITION FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING
F. van Doesum
Reduce accidents and energy utilization during the drive based on the object/user/climate conditions.
• Smart computers • Capable CPU’s in cars • Sharing of information
between cars
• Patents on the technology
• Proven prototypes and application
This technology enables the computer to detect objects by using cameras around the car and through further processing can enable the CPU to make decision.
• Lot of applications across different industries
• Transporation, logistics, etc
Smart parking (Horizon 2020)
Dynamic Traffic Management Study (CIVITAS)
• Reduce accidents • share information between
cars
• Numerous existing research and development can be used
• Not many products exist in the market
• Industry lacks the necessary infrastructure
• Lack of infrastructure and regulations to control
• Lack of real applications beyond prototypes
• Lack of awareness
X
X
X
X X X
X X
41
Framework Development.Key elements
INNOVATION PROFILES
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Robotic waste collec tion syste ms aim to bring the efficiency of autonomous robots to the
waste collection process. These robots assist wi th safe and efficient waste collecti on services,
avoiding the need for huma ns to perform heavy lifting a nd potentially dangerous tasks.
Currently, robotic waste collection systems are in the early development stages, with only two
existing prototypes developed by universities: DustCart and the Robot-based Autonomous
Refuse (ROAR) handli ng system. We will within the next ten years see self-driving refuse
collection vehicles (RCVs) on the market, which can travel autonomously using systems
developed for commercial transporta tion and logis tics purposes (i.e. cars, busses, trucks, and
drones). However, it will take longer before we see an autonomous mechanical robot that is
able to perform the physical action of consiste ntly emptying waste containers using a loader.
Using technology from drones, we may see the development of remote-operated waste
collection vehicles.
Robotic Waste Collection Systems
Key benefits
Internal fit
§ Increased safety§ Operating efficiency§ First-mover/pioneer advantage§ Commercial synergies§ Synergies with robotic waste
separation
Opportunity assessment
TOTAL MARKET SIZE
Limited Moderate High Very high
DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL
Very highHighModerateLimited
TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY
Basicresearch
Appliedresearch
Productconcept
Marketready
MARKET READINESS
10+years
6-10years
3-6years
0-3years
FIT WITH OWN CAPABILITIES
Limited Moderate High Very high
STRATEGIC FIT
Limited Moderate High Very high
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
ADDRESSABILITY
Veryhigh
Veryhigh
LimitedLimited
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Act
STATUS
Interested
Rely on supplier
Project planned
Research project
Product development
Ready to market
Own activities
GOALS
STAKEHOLDERS
Key actors
Business model details
ADDRESSED CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Managing MSW can be a great challenge for authoritieswith approximately 85% of the total MSW managementbudget usually exhausted on waste collection andtransportation. As waste generation increases, thesecosts will only increase. More innovative wastecollection systems are required to make the processmore efficient, while maintaining safe operations.
VALUE PROPOSITION
§ Smart systems§ Optimized waste collection§ Ability to avoid obstacles§ Risk prevention§ Social benefits§ Ability to collect waste from narrow streets§ Environment monitoring capabilities§ Human interface capabilities
RADAR SCREEN
ONLINE PLATFORM & PROCESS
42
Viable Cities Innovation Radarwill be Online.
43
The Innovation Radar.A tool for networked foresight, portfolio management and co-creation
2035
2028
2022
2018
1
2
9
45
6
789
12
3
46
7
9
10
11
1213
1 2
3
4
5
76
8
958
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2122 1
2
34
51
2
2018
2022
2028
2035
The Viable Cities Innovation Radar…
... allows for systematic and collaborative scanning for future trends and innovation opportunities.
… is a co-creation platform for discussing, assessing and validating information with members and externals.
… supports developing the strategic innovation agenda, managing the project portfolio and guiding new calls.
... allows for identifying experts in specific innovation fields and initiating joint project proposals.
... serves as a repository for information and knowledge and as a project database.
44
Innovation Radar framework.Feedback and discussion
We are eager to receive your feedback and ideas on the Viable Cities Radar: › Assessment criteria
› Profile categories
› Process and engagement
› More…
… or via e-mail after the Strategy Day:
45
Thank you! Questions?
46
Workshop – split in two sessions
InternationalisationLiquid Roadmap
Knowledge sharing Entrepreneurship
BoraBora Lounge
47
Viable Cities strategic projects – wrap up
InternationalisationLiquid Roadmap
Knowledge sharing Entrepreneurship
Thank you for today!Time to mingle Enjoy!