streamlining technology-driven orchestration in formal learning spaces
TRANSCRIPT
Streamlining Technology-drivenOrchestration in Formal Learning
SpacesLighton Phiri1 · Christoph Meinel2 · Hussein Suleman1
1Department of Computer Science, University of Cape Town, South Africa2Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Germany
MotivationEducators can be more effective whensupported with orchestration—themanagement of learning activities.
Orchestration is FlawedTechnology-driven orchestration ischallenging [1] and, arguably, ad hoc.It is multi-faceted and not standardised.
Proposed Solution
Streamline orchestration by facilitatingorganisation of learning activities.Organisation could lead to effectiveness.
Streamlined Orchestration WorkflowStreamlining orchestration takes the form of a softwareorchestration workbench which facilitates the integration andcentralised access to tools and services required to orchestratelearning activities.
Orchestration workflow procedure involves four steps.
Step 1: Activities
– Define activitieshierarchical structures formodules and sessions.
Step 2: Resources
– Organised learningresources (e.g. PDFs,videos and URLs).
Step 3: Sequencing
– Create sequence chain todefine orchestration orderof activities.
Step 4: Orchestration
– Playback saved sequencechain during learningsession.
Pre-session management is performed in steps 1–3 andsession management is performed in step 4.
Study 1: Orchestrating a Flipped Class
Flipped class case study conducted using prototpye Workbenchto assess evaluate approach in authentic educational setting [4].
Organisation
Timer Feature
Activity Listing
100 50 0 50 100Percentage
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Figure 1. Learners’ Experience Survey Results
Noticeable neutral flow of activities and potential positive effecton learners’ learning experience.
Study 2: Peer-led Guided Orchestration
Controlled study involving 24 Tutors, for first year ComputerScience courses, aimed at measuring orchestration load.
Frustration
Effort
Performance
Temporal Demand
Mental Demand
Physical Demand
0 20 40 60 80 100
Mean Raw Rating
NA
SA
-TL
XS
ubsc
ales
Figure 2. Sequencing Workload Ratings
NASA-TLX used to mea-sure orchestration load.
– High values imply highworkload.
– Width of bars reflectsimportance of weight.
– Height of barsrepresents magnitude ofrating.
Results suggest minimal workload requirement during scripting.
Study 3: Ad Hoc vs. Organised Orchestration
Controlled study conducted with 61 educators in order tocompare ad hoc orchestration and organised orchestration [3].
– Workbench prototype UI simulated organised orchestration.
– PortableApps simulated ad hoc orchestration.
SuperfluousSuperfluous
TooTooSelf-Self-
OrientedOrientedSelf-Self-
OrientedOriented
TooTooTask-Task-
OrientedOriented
NeutralNeutral Task-Task-OrientedOriented
DesiredDesired
Pragmatic Quality (PQ)
Hed
onic
Qua
lity
(HQ
)
PortableApps Workbench
Figure 3. Portfolio Presentation
6.74
5.57
PortableApps
Workbench
0 2 4 6 8 10
Mean Task Time (Min)
Tec
hniq
ue
Figure 4. Time on Tasks
-3
-1
1
3
PQ HQ-I HQ-S ATT
Dimensions
Mea
nS
core
PortableApps Workbench
Figure 5. Dimension Means
AttrakDiff 2 used an measure-ment instrument.Organised orchestration is:
– Desirable and 21% faster.
– Correlated with improveduser experience.
Organised orchestration more effective than ad hoc.
Study 4: Reusable Orchestration OERs
Practical usage scenario assessed through implementation ofreusable virtual orchestration appliances (rVOA) [2].
– rVOA player: Flexible offline UI workflow component.
– rVOA repository: Scalable online repository platform.
Feasibility of integrating orchestration packages with OERs.
Acknowledgements
This work is funded, in part, by the Hasso Plattner Institute.
Bibliography
[1] Dillenbourg, P. Design for Classroom Orchestration.Computers & Education. 69:485–492, November 2013.
[2] Parker, N. and Valentyn, M. Reusable Virtual OrchestrationAppliances. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/qNOF7V
[3] Phiri, L., Meinel, C., and Suleman, H. Ad hoc vs. OrganisedOrchestration. In 8th IEEE International Conference onTechnology for Education. December 2016.
[4] Phiri, L., Meinel, C., and Suleman, H. StreamlinedOrchestration. Computers & Education. 95:231–238, April2016.