strengthening cp structures advocacy and partnerships; experiences from war child agenda why have...

6
Strengthening CP structures Advocacy and partnerships; experiences from War Child AGENDA Why have partnerships? Community Based CP vs. International Partnerships CP and advocacy Case example; PSS to Syrian refugees Conclusions & recommendations

Upload: millicent-newton

Post on 14-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Strengthening CP structures Advocacy and partnerships; experiences from War Child AGENDA Why have partnerships? Community Based CP vs. International Partnerships

Strengthening CP structures

Advocacy and partnerships; experiences from War Child

AGENDA

• Why have partnerships?• Community Based CP vs.

International Partnerships• CP and advocacy• Case example; PSS to Syrian

refugees• Conclusions & recommendations

Page 2: Strengthening CP structures Advocacy and partnerships; experiences from War Child AGENDA Why have partnerships? Community Based CP vs. International Partnerships

Why have partnerships?

NGO development

strategy

Policy development• Lobby• Public education

Policy development• Lobby• Public education

• Political reforms• Public sector

reforms

• Institutional strengthening

• Community capacity

• wellbeing

• Good governance

• Civil society strengthened

Adapted from McQuaid, R.W. (2000) .Theory of partnerships

Partnerships; networking

Page 3: Strengthening CP structures Advocacy and partnerships; experiences from War Child AGENDA Why have partnerships? Community Based CP vs. International Partnerships

• Definition of CP = protection against physical abuse, emotional abuse, neglect & exploitation.CBCP vs. International Partnerships

In many cases there is not even National Government support, so how can international advocacy help?• Awareness of the issue• Funding• UN CRC; EU CAAC guidelines protection

• Definition of CP = protection against physical abuse, emotional abuse, neglect & exploitation.

• In all cases: CP = prevention and response (laws, info services, qualified staff & funding)

• Community Based = community owned, facilitated – not implemented by WCH, work with existing structures, action plans (including livelihoods)

Page 4: Strengthening CP structures Advocacy and partnerships; experiences from War Child AGENDA Why have partnerships? Community Based CP vs. International Partnerships

Syrian refugees in Lebanon (system building at different levels):

- start with child and direct circle around the child – awareness and capacity building, child participation

- Strengthen what already exits, not put in place something new – need to know what is there and how it works

- alignment indigenous/traditional/informal with formal system - advocating for taking responsibility

- Intensive intervention for 2 years – exit planned from entry

-> reduction school drop outs (also Lebanese kids)!

CP and advocacy

Page 5: Strengthening CP structures Advocacy and partnerships; experiences from War Child AGENDA Why have partnerships? Community Based CP vs. International Partnerships

Psychosocial support to Syrian refugees

Cartoon made by Syrian Refugee Children, used in the Netherlands for advocacy purposes to other partner organisations

Page 6: Strengthening CP structures Advocacy and partnerships; experiences from War Child AGENDA Why have partnerships? Community Based CP vs. International Partnerships

Conclusions and recommendations

CB approach to CP: include children

Long term investment :1. life is not back to normal after emergency is ‘over’

2. Chronic / cyclic recurring emergencies

CB CP needs advocacy at all levels for it to work

Stimulate ownership – but how? Many questions, few answers?

Community based approach makes a difference in particular because prevention is embedded