structural materials r&d for iter test blanket modules
DESCRIPTION
Structural Materials R&D for ITER Test Blanket Modules. R. J Kurtz 1 and S. J. Zinkle 2 1 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 2 Oak Ridge National Laboratory ITER-TBM Meeting August 10-12, 2005 Idaho Falls, ID. Vacuum Permeator 2000 Nb or Ta Tubes R i = 10 mm t w = 0.5 mm - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
U.S. Department of EnergyPacific Northwest National Laboratory
Structural Materials R&D for ITER Test Blanket Modules
R. J Kurtz1 and S. J. Zinkle2
1Pacific Northwest National Laboratory2Oak Ridge National Laboratory
ITER-TBM MeetingAugust 10-12, 2005Idaho Falls, ID
DCLL PbLi Flow Schematic
He inletHe outlet
PbLipump
Cryo-Vacuum pumpVacuum Permeator2000 Nb or Ta Tubes
Ri = 10 mmtw = 0.5 mmPop < 1 MPaPac ~ 8 MPa
BlanketConcentric pipes
Heat ExchangerNb or Ta Tubes
~20,000 m2
Ri = 10 mmtw = 1.0 mm
Pop = 8-10 MPaPac = ?
T2 outlet
Inter-cooler Pre-cooler Recuperator
Pressure boundary (90°C)
Generator
Turbo-compressorPower turbine
Closed Brayton Cycle
700°C PbLi
460°C PbLiPT2 in PbLi ~0.5 Pa (inlet)
PT2 in PbLi <0.03 Pa (outlet)
Possible Project Structure and Organization
Test Blanket Module (both HCSB and DCLL) R&D, fabrication, testing and qualification should be broken down into major subsystems (e.g.):• In-vessel TBM• Ex-vessel piping• Tritium extraction system• Heat exchanger system
This places the emphasis on identifying the elements needed to deliver major pieces of equipment.
Each subsystem then has an appropriate set of tasks designed to address the needs for that particular subsystem.
Structural Materials R&D Issues - I
In-Vessel TBM• Structural materials will need to be code qualified which places
stringent requirements on materials characterization and generation of an engineering database for design activities and licensing.
• Fabrication techniques must consider the possible need for thermo-mechanical treatments that will affect final microstructure and possibly impact in-service properties.
• Fabrication methods must also allow for possible pre-service and in-service nondestructive inspection.
• Given detailed design specifications TBM fabrication is an activity best accomplished by industry.
• High-temperature design rules need to be developed.
300
200
Built-in Cooling Channels
HIP and post HIP heat treatment conditions have been optimized. HIP at 1150 ºC + PHHT at 930 ºC + Tempering
As received 1040oCx2hHIPed
1150oCx0.5hHomogenized
Homogenizing+920oCx0.5h
Homogenizing+930oCx0.5h
Homogenizing+940oCx0.5h
100 m
Fabrication Technology of Blanket Modules
F82H as recievedGrain Size # G : 5Grain Size : 60m
1040 ºC x 2hr x 150MPa Grain Size #G : 2Grain Size : 170m
Akiba, TBWG-15, 2005
R.L. Klueh and D.R. Harries, High-Chromium Ferritic and Martensitic Steels for Nuclear Applications (2001) p. 73
As-welded
After post weld heat treatment
Effect of Heat Treatment on the Hardness Profile in a GTA Weld in a F/M Steel
Time-Temperature Transformation Curve for F82H Steel
R.L. Klueh and D.R. Harries, High-Chromium Ferritic and Martensitic Steels for Nuclear Applications (2001) p. 33
Effect of Hardening on Stress Corrosion Cracking
S.A. Shipilov, JOM (March 2005) p. 36
Extend rules to all joining techniques and typical junctions foreseen in TBM concepts.
Extend rules to composites and multi-layers structures and materials with low ductility and pronounced anisotropy.
Application to complex loading and loading histories with multiple potential failure modes, in the presence of: Multiaxial loading Stress and temperature gradients Interaction of thermal creep and fatigue with irradiation damage
(swelling and irradiation creep)
High-Temperature Design Rules
Analysis
Results
Assessment
Benefit
Structural Analysis Tool: Finite Element Analysis
Prospects andLimitations
Evaluate Loading HistoriesTemperature Fields
Stress and Strain Fields
Identify CriticalLoads
Input for Mock-Up Tests Design and Operation
Development and Improvementof Concepts
Define Loads for Verification Expts and
Analysis
Identify CriticalLocations
Close Coupling of Structural Analysis and Materials Development is Essential
Structural Materials R&D Issues - II In-Vessel TBM
• For ITER the choice of structural material is limited to F82H and Eurofer since the U.S. needs to take advantage of the large international database on these steels.
• Development of joining technology of Be to ferritic steel (structural materials issue?).
• Effects of radiation to ~3 dpa at 100-550°C on the deformation and fracture properties of structural materials.
• The upcoming U.S./Japan HFIR 15J/16J irradiation experiment provides a good approximation of the TBM irradiation conditions (300/400°C, 2.5-5 dpa). New heat of Eurofer to be included.
• The irradiation performance of specific manufacturing processes and joining techniques such as HIPped and diffusion bonded materials needs to be determined (presently not nuclear qualified).
• Creep-fatigue interaction due to the high number of short operational pulses in ITER is a concern.
Low Temperature Radiation Hardening of RAFM Steels
Robertson et al.
(a)
(b)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
F82H IEA Std.
Engineering Strain (%)
Irrad. at 573K
Tested at RT
Irrad. 773K
Tested at RT
Irrad. 773K
Tested at 773K
Irrad. at 573K
Tested at 573K
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
F82H IEA TIG
Engineering Strain (%)
Irrad. at 573K
Tested at RT
Irrad. at 573K
Tested at 573K
Irrad. at 773K
Tested at 773K
Irrad. at 773K
Tested at RT
Fig. 1 Stress-strain curves of F82H BM (a) and TIG (b) irradiated at 573K and 773K in tests at RT
F82H BM
F82H TIG
Slip plane: (110) and (011)
Slip direction: [111] and [111] Dislocation channels
Deformation band
N. Hashimoto et al., Fus.Sci.Tech. 44 (2003)490
B ≈ [111]g = 110
110
500nm100nm
110
Irradiated weld metal (lower radiation hardening) did notexhibit dislocation channeling after deformation
5 dpa
5 dpa
F82H base metal
F82H TIG weld
Deformation Microstructures in Neutron-Irradiated F82H Base and Weld Metal
y
eu
Irradiation Hardening and Ductility Loss
Odette, 2002
Temperature and Dose Dependence of Fracture Toughness for F82H and Eurofer
Sokolov, 2000
Andreani et al., JNM 2004
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100
Test Temperature [°C]
Energy [J]
MANET-I
F82H modEUROFER 97
OPTIFER V
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500
Test Temperature [°C]
Energy [J]
MANET-I
300°C/2.4 dpa
OPTIFER V
300°C/2.4 dpa
Effect of alloy composition Effect of irradiation
In contrast to conventional FM steels (MANET-I), RAFM steels show favourable toughness and embrittlement properties
R. Lindau et al., SOFT23, Fus. Eng. Des. (2005) in press
Effect of Alloying and Neutron Irradiation on the Charpy Impact Properties of F/M Steels
Structural Materials R&D Issues - III Ex-Vessel Piping
• Chemical compatibility of structural materials with PbLi to ~700°C.
• Aluminum bearing corrosion resistant alloys show promise of forming a protective alumina surface layer, lowering corrosion in PbLi. A critical need is to carry out tests in a PbLi loop with thermal gradients.
Tritium Extraction System• To achieve high performance from DCLL concept may require
use of refractory metals.• The acceptable inventory of gaseous impurities and the kinetics
of impurity pickup control mechanical behavior of these metals.• The partial pressure of oxygen must be <10-10 torr to limit
unacceptable oxygen ingress.• The compatibility of refractory metals with flowing, 700°C PbLi
has not been demonstrated.
Kinetics of Oxygen Pickup in Nb
The observed oxygen concentration can be significantly lower than thermal equilibrium values.• Protective scale formation (generally
does not occur in refractory metals at high temperature and low oxygen partial pressure).
• Application of protective coating (e.g., Pd).
• The oxygen impingement flux is directly proportional to the oxygen partial pressure.
The oxygen pressure limit can be derived from the impingement flux and a limiting oxygen concentration in Nb.
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6
Oxygen Partial Pressure, torr
1000 h
1 y
10 y
Assumes 3 mm wall thickness and oxygen ingress from one surface only
€
Γ=P
2πmkT( )1
2
T = 700°C
Maximum Estimated Interstitial Levels for Various Refractory Metals
Ghoniem, 1998~200~150~100Cr, Mo, W
Charlot and Westerman, 1974~300Mo-TZM
Charlot and Westerman, 1974<4000Nb-1Zr (Weld)
Charlot and Westerman, 1974~8000Nb-1Zr (Wrought)
Zinkle and Ghoniem, 2000~1500V
Ghoniem, 1998~10,000~4000~2000V, Nb, Ta
Charlot and Westerman, 1974<2100~3000~3000Nb
ReferenceCNOMaterial
Contaminant Levels, wppm
Structural Materials R&D Issues - IV
Heat Exchanger System• Refractory metals are also under consideration for the heat
exchanger system.• Impurity inventory in the He coolant largely controls the rate of
impurity pickup (other sources from adsorbed gases and in-leakage may be important). To avoid excessive impurity ingress the He coolant must be highly purified. The level of purification needed will be dictated by the mass of He relative to the mass of refractory metal tubing and component outgassing.
• Other factors such as fabricability, weldability, fracture toughness, cost and the potential for dissimilar metal corrosion (refractory to ferritic steel transition) needs be considered in evaluating the feasibility of using refractory metals in these applications.
Comments
Will the lower performance DCLL TBM envisaged for ITER be sufficiently attractive to justify the expense for the U.S. to independently pursue this approach?
The advantages of the lower performance DCLL option relative to other liquid breeder concepts being developed for ITER needs to be highlighted in the mission needs statement.
Considerable R&D on refractory metals is needed to determine if the high-performance DCLL concept is viable.
If the low-performance DCLL concept is sufficiently attractive then the most cost-effective approach for structural materials development is to make maximal use of ongoing work in the EU and Japan - provided the design and operating conditions are not too different.