structure and phase transition phenomena in the vtc problem c. p. gomes, h. kautz, b. selman r....
Post on 21-Dec-2015
220 views
TRANSCRIPT
Structure and Phase Transition Phenomena
in the VTC Problem
C. P. Gomes, H. Kautz, B. Selman
R. Bejar, and I. Vetsikas
IISIIISI
Cornell UniversityCornell University
University of WashingtonUniversity of Washington
Outline
I - Structure vs. complexity - new results II - VTC Domain - The allocation problem
Definitions of fairness Boundary Cases Results on average case complexity
fixed probability model constant connectivity model
III - Conclusions and Future Work
Structure vs. Complexity New results
Quasigroup Completion Problem (QCP)
Quasigroup Completion Problem (QCP)
Given a matrix with a partial assignment of colors (32%colors in this case), can it be completed so that each color occurs exactly once in each row / column (latin square or quasigroup)?Example:
32% preassignment
Phase Transition
Almost all unsolvable area
Fraction of preassignmentFra
ctio
n o
f u
nso
lvab
le c
ases
Almost all solvable area
Complexity Graph
Phase transition from almost all solvableto almost all unsolvable
Co
mp
uta
tio
nal
Co
st
Quasigroup Patterns and Problems Hardness
Rectangular Pattern Aligned Pattern Balanced Pattern
Tractable Very hard
Hardness is also controlled by structure of constraints, not just percentage of holes
Bandwidth
Bandwidth: permute rows and columns of QCP to minimize the width of the narrowest diagonal band that covers all the holes.
Fact: can solve QCP in time exponential in bandwidth
swap
Random vs Balanced
BalancedRandom
After Permuting
Balanced bandwidth = 4
Random bandwidth = 2
Structure vs. Computational Cost
Balanced QCP
QCP
% of holes
Com
pu
tati
on
al
cost
Balancing makes the instances very hard - it increases bandwith!
Aligned/ Rectangular QCP
Structural FeaturesStructural Features
The understanding of the structural properties that characterize problem instances such as phase transitions, backbone, balance, and bandwith provides new insights into the practical complexity of many computational tasks.
Virtual Transportation Company
The Allocation Problem
Problem: How to allocate the jobs to the companies?
j1 j2 j3 j4 j5
c1 100
100
50 50 50
c2 95 90 30 25 30
c3 95 90 25 30 25
Definition of Fairness I
Min-max fairness:min maxi TotalCosti
9095c3
30253090c2
505050
253025
95
100100c1
j5j4j3j2j1
Definition of Fairness II
Lex min-max fairness:
9095c3
30253090c2
505050
253025
95
100100c1
j5j4j3j2j1 Ordered Cost Vectors:
r(S’)=<100,90,80>
r(S’’)=<100,95,80>
r(S’)<r(S’’)Very powerful notion - analogous to fairness notion used in load balancing for network design (Kleinberg et al 2000)
Allocation ProblemWorst-Case Complexity
min-max fairness version of problem: Equivalent to Minimum Multiprocessor
Scheduling Worst-case complexity: NP-Hard
Lex min-max fairness version: At least as hard as min-max fairness
Boundary Cases
Uniform bidding All companies declare the same cost for a
given job (same values in all cells of a given column)
NP-hard : equivalent to Bin Packing Uniform cost
A company declares the same cost for alljobs (identical jobs) Polynomial worst case complexity: O(NxM)
C3C2C1
J2J1 J3
J2J1 J3C3C2C1
Average-Case Complexity: Instance Distributions
Generating an instance: Two ways of selecting the companies for each
job: Fixed connectivity: For each job select exactly c
companies Constant-Probability: For each job each company is
selected with probability p
The costs for the selected companies are chosen from a uniform distribution
The cost for the non-selected companies is
Fixed Connectivity Model
companies/jobs
Branches% of Solutions
100%
50%
0%
75%
25%
1200
600
0
companies/jobs
c=2c=3c=4
75%100%
100%
50%
25%
0%
Complexity and Phase Transition with c=3
Phase Transition with different c
Constant-probability Model
-50
50
150
250
350
450
550
650
750
companies/jobs
Branches
% of Solutions
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
companies/jobs
p=0.16
p=0.17
p=0.18
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
Complexity and Phase Transition with p=0.18
Phase Transition with different p
Comparison of the complexity between the two models
Fixed connectivity model is harder
insights into the design of bidding models
Conclusions
Importance of understanding impact of structural features on computational cost
VTC Domain: Definitions of fairness Boundary cases
Structure of the cost matrix Average complexity
Critical parameter: #companies/#jobs --->
Future work
I - Further study structural issues (e.g., effect of balancing, backbone in the VTC domain)
II - Further explore Lex Min Max fairness - very powerful! Other notions of fairness.
III - Consider combinatorial bundles instead of independent jobs
IV - Game Theory issues - Strategies for the DOD to provide incentives for
companies to be truthful and to penalize high declared costs