stuart gillespie, senior research staff international food policy research institute
TRANSCRIPT
The politics of reducing malnutrition: building commitment and accelerating
impact
Stuart GillespieInternational Food Policy Research Institute
Nairobi, 11 June 2015
Lancet Nutrition Series (2013) Paper 4:
Gillespie, Stuart; Haddad, Lawrence; Mannar, Venkatesh; Menon, Purnima; and Nisbett, Nicholas (2013) The politics of reducing malnutrition: Building commitment and accelerating progress. The Lancet 382 (9891): 552-569.
The Lancet framework
3
Shifts in the nutrition landscape
4
Rationale for Lancet paper
• Political discourse ramped up since 2008• Greater consensus on:– nature of problem of undernutrition and its causes– package of key nutrition-specific interventions– need for complementary nutrition-sensitive actions
• A third level of action – relating to the political, institutional and policy environment -- is key, but it has been neglected.
• Nutrition continues to lag behind economic growth
• How can enabling environments and processes be cultivated, sustained and ultimately translated into impact on the ground? 5
Reviews and analyses
• Policy process literature review– led to structure of paper
• SUN 6-country e-consultation• SUN country tabulation• Three country case studies
– Maharashtra, Peru, Malawi
• Nutrition Commitment Index• Nutrition leadership assessment
6
What does an enabling environment look like?
What does an enabling environment look like?
Three vital factors for creating momentum and converting it to impact:
7
Creating and sustainingmomentum for undernutrition
reduction
Converting momentum to impact on nutrition status
Framing, generating and communicating knowledge and evidence
• Framing and narratives • What works?• How well do nutrition interventions work
relative to other interventions?• Evidence/data on outcomes and benefits• Advocacy to increase priority (civil society)• Evidence on coverage and scale
• Implementation research (what works, why and how)
• Monitoring coverage• Programme evaluation (impact pathways)• Generating demand for evidence of impact• Learning during crisis
Political economy of actors, ideas and interests• Incentivising and delivering horizontal
coherence (multisectoral coordination)• Building up accountability to citizens• Civil society: galvanizing commitment• Enabling and incentivizing positive
contributions from the private sector
• Delivering horizontal and vertical coherence
• The role of civil society in delivery & impact
• The role of private sector
Capacity (individual, organizational, systemic) and financing• Leadership/championing• Systemic capacity to sustain commitment• Understanding financing and making the
case for additional resource mobilisation
• Prioritisation and sequencing of nutrition action
• Capacity for Implementation and scaling up
• New forms of resource mobilisation
1. Knowledge and evidence
• Undernutrition is multisectoral and open to multiple interpretations; each context requires its own enabling narrative or framing
• Multisectorality challenges nutrition programme implementation and evaluation
• Irreversibility early in life: high return to timely and reliable information on nutrition status and its determinants
• Societal benefits will not be captured within short term political cycles. Rigorous research needed on the longer term benefits of undernutrition prevention, so that politicians can be more confident of the value of the returns that will be realized long after they are out of power
Nutrition Narratives
• Nutrition for Growth
• Supercharging the Demographic Dividend
• Nourishing Minds
• Child Survival
• Hidden Hunger
• Zero Hunger
• Preventing NCDs in later life
Narratives need to be backed up with credible evidence
Narratives need to be backed up with credible evidence
10
2. Politics and governance
• Many actors and agencies, each with different and frequently competing agendas (esp. in decentralized systems of governance), need to work together to reduce undernutrition
• All but the most extreme manifestations of undernutrition are invisible, and thus open to neglect, so even well-meaning governments may underinvest in nutrition
• Nutrition trend and program impact data often out of date or virtually absent, allowing unsubstantiated political narratives to be sustained in an evidence vacuum
Policy coherence
12
Tools for improving commitment, accountability and responsiveness to
undernutrition reduction
Capacity and Resources
• Human and organizational capacity is more than nutrition know-how; soft-power skills needed to operate across boundaries and disciplines (e.g. leadership for alliance building and networking, communicating the case for collaboration, leveraging resources and being able to speak truth to those in power)
• Strategic and operation capacities of different actors at several levels are key
• Additional financial resources and much better budget data are required if undernutrition efforts are to be scaled up, with innovation required from governments and donors to maximize investment
Systemic capacity strengthening
15
enable….. require…..
ToolsSkills
Staff and InfrastructureStructures, Systems and Roles
Brough and Potter (2004)
e (2001)
e (2001)
e (2001)
• Why some countries address nutrition better than others is still an enigma
• Evidence on ‘what to do’ is relatively clear. What’s not clear is why it’s not done.
• Individuals have been recognised as essential in championing the policy changes necessary to address undernutrition
• But…how much do we know about the people who are, or could be, leaders in the field of nutrition?
Nutrition leadership: why and how?
TN’s leadership assessment: key questions
• What is motivating people to become leaders in nutrition, is there anything common in their background which may have led to them to champion nutrition?
• What enables leaders to operate effectively in the nutrition policy sphere; In particular, what are their analytical and political capabilities?
• What are the external challenges and barriers to their effective operation?
• What do leaders assess as knowledge gaps that are important to fill; how do they employ their existing knowledge?
• How can the international policy community better support and nurture emerging leaders?
MotivatorsPersonal experience
ExposureTraining
Data
Political & communication skills
Strategy/visionAlliance buildingUse of evidenceCommunication
Boundary crossing
KnowledgeTechnical / nutrition
specificProgramming/practice
Decision makers Influencers Clients
Find the framingAdvocacy/campaigns
Electoral pressurePersuade individuals
around them
Training:Mobilisation skills
Grassroots accountability and
advocacy skills
‘Leadership Training’
Workplace competency, performance &
rewards criteria Support networks/ alliances
Consensus buildingBring others in
Reward and exemplify other champions and
cases of successBring champions
together
Training and education – how to recognise
nutrition. Information on rights and responsibilities
and what are the politicians doing?
Clear narrativesClear evidence
Brief multisec trainingImmersions
Support think tanks, other knowledge brokers, media
Improve curricula
Clear narrativesClear evidence
Brief multisec trainingImmersions
Make nutrition visible at the community level – real time monitoring;
community accountability; support
for community mobilisers
Find the framingAdvocacy/campaigns
Electoral pressurePersuade individuals
around them
Nutrition Champions Nutrition Policy Entrepreneurs Nutrition Supporters
Nisbett, N., Wach, E., Haddad, L., El-Arifeen, S., Wach (2014) What are the factors enabling and constraining effective leaders in Nutrition? A four country Study. IDS Working Paper 447 IDS: Brighton
Can we build leadership competencies?
Hughes R, Shrimpton R, Recine E, Margetts B. A competency framework for global public health nutrition workforce development : A background paper.2011. World Public Health Nutrition Association.
Transforming Nutrition: Ideas, Policy and Outcomes
Can we recognise, incentivize and support nutrition champions?
Resources for Nutrition: Look everywhere but be guided by a plan, with checks
and balances
22
Table 3: Summary of key issues arising from country case studies
Building commitment Turning commitment into action and impact Evidence, data, perceptions
Clarify agriculture-nutrition links (that go beyond food pathways) Stakeholder consultations, cross-sectoral dialogue Learn a new language (incentives)/nutrition literacy Highlight mutual gain (“win-wins”) Support civil society advocacy Engage the media Raise awareness about nutrition at all levels
Ensure policy is implementable Generate and use actionable evidence Operational research and evaluations Highlight what works in programmes Embed relevant indicators in wider M&E systems NGO role in piloting and innovation Learn about scale up and integration
Policy, politics, governance
Horizontal (cross-sectoral) coherence Priority-setting and policy formulation processes Address production bias Identify mechanisms for communication and coordination Decision-making incentives (for change) Leadership/champions Pro-nutrition legislation Global and regional conferences and movements
Vertical coherence (national to community) Ensure incentives for implementation Clarify and ensure accountability at all levels Decide whether to integration or co-locate programmes and interventions Empower women through agriculture Engage private sector and other development partners, based on comparative advantage. Forums for sharing lessons on what works
Capacity and finance
Lateral leadership (across sectors) Policymaker rotation problematic Coordination capacity (e.g. multistakeholder platforms) Capacity to demand and use research evidence
Operational capacity / implementation coordination Pre and in-service training Under-used research capacity Leveraging private sector capacity Funding not necessarily the major problem North-South and South-South knowledge exchange
Enabling environments are needed to harmonize stakeholders and unleash the potential of both nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive actions.
Key features of enabling environments for nutrition:• Systems for generating and using evidence and data, collective
approach, political approach, strengthened accountability, strengthened capacity at all levels, more creativity around resource mobilisation with stronger checks and balances
Leadership at all levels is fundamentally important – for creating and sustaining momentum and for converting it to impact
Operational research on how to scale up (with quality and intensity) and a shift in emphasis to the “why?” and “how?” as well as the “what” of effectiveness
Political will and momentum can be created.
Undernutrition reduction can be accelerated through deliberate action
Key messages
25
Thank you