student satisfaction of learning management syetems

30
Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Systems EVAN FONDREN Falculty Advisor: Dr. Mark Borzi Department of Communication Arts Valdosta State University Valdosta, GA Fall 2016 valdosta.edu

Upload: evan-fondren

Post on 14-Apr-2017

43 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Systems

EVAN FONDRENFalculty Advisor: Dr. Mark Borzi

Department of Communication Arts Valdosta State University

Valdosta, GA

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 2: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Introduction

01

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 3: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

An LMS is a self-contained webpage with embedded instructional tools that permit faculty to organize academic content and

engage students in their learning.

Gautreau, C. (2011)

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 4: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Learning Management Systems software provides learners with a comprehensive environment for

communicating with instructors, submitting assignments, reviewing course objectives,

downloading course material, participating in class discussions and viewing course progress.

Thomas, B. , & Eryilmaz, E. (2014)

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 5: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Basic LMS Features

Online assessment of students

Direct Messaging/Emailing

Electronic assignment submission

Student progress in a course

Online class discussions

Course content distribution

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 6: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Rational

LMS are still in their infancy

More Institutions are implementing LMS

Technology is rapidly evolving, and so are LMS

Distance learning is trending

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 7: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Background

02

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 8: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Technology Acceptance Model

Fred D. Davis, 1989

Used to determine user adoption of technology

Does the user find the technology easy to use?

Does the user find the technology useful?

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 9: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Technology Acceptance Model

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

External

Variables

Perceived

Usefulness

Behavioral

Intention to UseActual Use

Attitude

Towards

Perceived

Ease of Use

Page 10: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Technology Acceptance Model

Park; 2009

Mijatovic, Cudanov, Jednak, and Kadijevich; 2013

Yeou; 2016

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 11: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Research Question & Hypothesis

03

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 12: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Do students with more exposure to Learning

Management Systems have greater satisfaction

when using an LMS?

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

RQ1

Page 13: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

There is a significant difference in satisfaction towards

Learning Management Systems between students who

have more exposure to Learning Management Systems

and students who have less exposure.

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

H1

Page 14: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Methods

04

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 15: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Sampling

Target Population: College Students

Sampling Frame: Students who have used an LMS

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 16: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Instrumentation

Survey/Questionnaire

Qualtrics

Question Display Logic

Amount of Use Measured

4-Point Likert-Scales

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 17: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Instrumentation

Electronic Assignment Submission

Online Discussion Boards

Online Assessments

Course Content

Grades/Feedback

Direct Messaging

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 18: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Analysis

t-test for the significance of the correlation coefficient

Sum of Usage Totals

Sum of Likert Scales

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 19: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Data

05

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 20: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Fal l  2016 valdosta.edu

R

0.2892 0.0836 No

R2 Significant?

Usage and Satisfaction Correlation

Page 21: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Do students prefer submitting assignments through an LMS?

Do students prefer class discussion on an LMS?

Do students prefer taking assessments on an LMS?

Do students prefer to email their instructors with an LMS?

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

RQs

Page 22: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Fal l  2016 valdosta.edu

M

2.1 1.06 8.1E-13

0.64

7.08E-14

0.19

1.22

0.84

1.04

3.03

1.54

2.8

No

No

Yes

Yes

SD p Significant?Feature

Electronic Assignment Submission

Online Discussion Boards

Online Assessments

Direct Messaging

Page 23: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Discussion

06

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 24: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Conclusion

There is no significant difference in satisfaction towards

Learning Management Systems between students who

have more exposure to Learning Management Systems

and students who have less exposure.

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 25: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Conclusion Students prefer to submit assignments

electronically through an LMS.

Students prefer to have class discussions in a

classroom setting.

Students prefer to take assessments online

through an LMS.

Students prefer to not use the direct messaging

feature in an LMS.

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 26: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Limitations Small sample size

Instrumentation

Operationalization

Validity

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 27: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Future Research Focus Groups

Improve Instrumentation

Focus on one LMS software

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 28: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

References Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions

in distance learning classes. Computers & Education, 75, 112–126.

Gautreau, C. (2011). Motivational Factors Affecting the Integration of a

Learning Management System by Faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 8(1).

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User

Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Mijatovic, I., Cudanov, M., Jednak, S., & Kadijevich, D. M. (2013).

How the usage of learning management systems influences student

achievement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(5), 506–517.

Park, S. Y. (2009). An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in

Understanding University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning.

Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3)

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 29: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Acknowledgements Special thanks to Dr. Mark Borzi for providing

instruction and guidance during this research

study.

Many thanks to all the participants who took the

time to take the online survey for this study.

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu

Page 30: Student Satisfaction of Learning Management Syetems

Questions?

Fal l 2016 valdosta.edu