students working collaboratively

18
Students working Students working Collaboratively Collaboratively

Upload: richard-zahra

Post on 29-Jun-2015

515 views

Category:

Education


4 download

DESCRIPTION

What makes collaborative work effective regarding students' learning?

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Students working collaboratively

Students working Students working CollaborativelyCollaboratively

Page 2: Students working collaboratively

Why small group Why small group collaboration?collaboration?

Research shows that it has Research shows that it has positive effects on learningpositive effects on learning

As long as there are:As long as there are:

– Shared goalsShared goals– Individual accountabilityIndividual accountability

22

Page 3: Students working collaboratively

Why small group Why small group collaboration?collaboration?

Transmission teaching styles Transmission teaching styles have reduced:have reduced:– QualityQuality– Quantity of student discussionQuantity of student discussion

Sometimes, groupwork might not Sometimes, groupwork might not profit student learning (depending profit student learning (depending on the type of talk in the groups). on the type of talk in the groups).

33

Page 4: Students working collaboratively

This unit will help you to:This unit will help you to:

List characteristics of discussions List characteristics of discussions that benefit learningthat benefit learning

Recognise teacher concernsRecognise teacher concerns Understand techniques for Understand techniques for

promoting effective discussionpromoting effective discussion Understand the teacher’s role in Understand the teacher’s role in

discussion managementdiscussion management Plan discussion based lessonsPlan discussion based lessons

44

Page 5: Students working collaboratively

A. Experiencing a A. Experiencing a discussiondiscussion

Read problem 4 on handout 1 Read problem 4 on handout 1 individually and write down your individually and write down your own response for itown response for it

Work as a group, compare your Work as a group, compare your responses and try to refine your responses and try to refine your answers until you feel you have answers until you feel you have reached a consensusreached a consensus

55

Page 6: Students working collaboratively

Some points for reflectionSome points for reflection

Did you find it helpful to have a chance to think about the question yourself before it was discussed in your group?

How far did you really think together, or did you tend to follow independent lines of thought?

66

Page 7: Students working collaboratively

Some points for reflectionSome points for reflection

Did someone 'take over'? Was someone a 'passenger'?

Did you listen to, share ideas with and consider the alternative views of everyone in the group?

77

Page 8: Students working collaboratively

Some points for reflectionSome points for reflection

Did you build on each others' ideas to construct chains of coherent reasoning?

Did you feel able to share your ideas

without fear of embarrassment of being wrong? Did anyone feel uncomfortable or threatened? If so, why?

88

Page 9: Students working collaboratively

Some points for reflectionSome points for reflection

Did your discussion stay 'on task' or were you 'wandering'?

99

Page 10: Students working collaboratively

Some points for reflectionSome points for reflection

What are the implications of this idea for your classroom?

1010

Page 11: Students working collaboratively

Some points for reflectionSome points for reflection

Most of the problems do not have one ‘definitive’ answer.

Students must think for themselves first.– Quick thinking and confident students are

more likely to dominate discussion.

1111

Page 12: Students working collaboratively

Types of student talk Types of student talk

Working Working in in a groupa group

VSVS

Working Working as as a groupa group

What’s the difference?What’s the difference?

1212

Page 13: Students working collaboratively

Types of student talk Types of student talk (Mercer 1995,2000)(Mercer 1995,2000)

Disputational talkDisputational talk – This consists – This consists of disagreement and individualised of disagreement and individualised decision making. It is characterised decision making. It is characterised by short exchanges consisting of by short exchanges consisting of assertions and counter-assertions. assertions and counter-assertions.

NOT BENEFICIALNOT BENEFICIAL

1313

Page 14: Students working collaboratively

Types of student talk Types of student talk (Mercer 1995,2000)(Mercer 1995,2000)

Cumulative talkCumulative talk – speakers build – speakers build positively and uncritically on what positively and uncritically on what each other has said. This is typically each other has said. This is typically characterised by repetitions, characterised by repetitions, confirmations and elaborations. confirmations and elaborations.

NOT BENEFICIALNOT BENEFICIAL

1414

Page 15: Students working collaboratively

Types of student talk Types of student talk (Mercer 1995,2000)(Mercer 1995,2000)

Exploratory talkExploratory talk – Speakers work – Speakers work on and elaborate each other’s on and elaborate each other’s reasoning in a collaborative reasoning in a collaborative atmosphere. Enables reasoning to atmosphere. Enables reasoning to become audible and knowledge become audible and knowledge becomes publicly accountable. becomes publicly accountable. Characterised by critical and Characterised by critical and constructive exchanges. constructive exchanges. Challenges are justified and Challenges are justified and alternative ideas are offered. alternative ideas are offered.

1515

Page 16: Students working collaboratively

B. Analysing a DiscussionB. Analysing a Discussion

1616

Page 17: Students working collaboratively

C. Recognising teacher C. Recognising teacher concernsconcerns

1717

Page 18: Students working collaboratively

D. Ground RulesD. Ground Rules

1818