studies on the pollen tube growth in six species of
TRANSCRIPT
460 Cytologia 23
Studies on the Pollen Tube Growth in Six Species of
Hibiscus and their Crosses in Vivo
P. Sanyal
Jute Agricultural Research Institute, Barrackpore, India
Received May 13, 1958
Introduction
Almost all the species of Hibiscus are known to produce fibre, but only two species, namely H. cannabinus L. ('Bimlipattam Jute', 'Mesta', 'Kenaf') and H. sabdariffa L. ('Roselle') are commercially exploited for fibre production. Hibiscus cannabinus is characterised by its short vegetative period
(3-4 months) with a superior quality of fibre, while H. sabdariffa is a long duration crop (7-8 months) with comparatively inferior quality of fibre, but is a heavy yielder. With the partition of India in 1947, the important jute
growing areas went over to Pakistan; consequently there had been a great shortage of raw jute in India for the requirement of the jute mills. As Hibiscus fibres can be easily mixed with jute in different proportions for spinning in jute mills, the shortage of jute was to some extent met by these fibres. Along with the increase in the cultivation of jute, there has also been an increase in the cultivation of Hibiscus fibres especially in areas where jute cannot be grown profitably. As a result the fibres from H. cannabinus and H. sabdariffa became very important in this country as substitutes for jute.
Attempts to hybridize cannabinus, 2n=36 with sabdariffa, 2n=72
(Deshpande 1938; Kist and Freiderich 1947 etc.) and also each of these two species with other species of Hibiscus (Toxopeus 1948) for inducing disease resistance and other economic characters were made in the past. All these workers reported the production of only non-viable seeds when cannabinus was crossed with sabdariffa and they considered that the outlook for hybridizing these two species was not promising. Toxopeus
(1948) in his preliminary attempts in crossing eight different species of Hibiscus, however, reported the successful hybridization of only between H. cannabinus and H. radiatus Willd, 2n=72 but he did not report any detailed study of this hybrid. After Toxopeus, no further investigation on the interspecific hybridization in Hibiscus have been reported so far.
With a view to induce disease resistance in H. cannabinus from other disease resistant species of Hibiscus and also to understand the affinities amongst them, six species of Hibiscus with chromosome numbers (as given by Darlington and Wylie 1955):-cannabinus, 2n=36; sabdariffa, 2n=72,
1958 Pollen Tube Growth in Hibiscus in vivo 461
radiatus, 2n=72; panduraeforrnis Burm, 2n=24; lunariifolius Willd , 2n=40 and vitifolius L., 2n=34+0-1B were crossed by the present author
(1957). The details of these crossing results and the cytogenetical study of the progenies of the successful hybrids are intended to be published else
where. The present paper only describes the results of the pollen tube
growth study in these crosses along with the parental species (controls) in vivo and also to investigate the basic cause of incompatibility , if any, due to pollen tube growth in some of these interspecific crosses .
Materials and methods
Selected flower buds with the stigma at the right stage of receptivity were emasculated and bagged. Controlled pollination were made between the six species of Hibiscus namely, cannabinus , sabdariffa, radiatus, lunariifolius, panduraeforrnis and vitifolius next day. Besides these, controlled self-pollination were also made in all these six species of Hibiscus . After pollination, the flowers were collected at different intervals of time (5, 10, 15, 30, 45 minutes, 1 hr., 1 hr. 15 mins., 1 hr. 30 mins ., 2 hrs., 2 hrs. 30 mins. and 3 hrs.); the ovary along with the style and stigma were dissected out from the rest of the flower and fixed in acetic alcohol (1:3). The dissected pistils were kept in acetic alcohol overnight , rinsed in absolute alcohol and stored in 70 percent alcohol.
For clearing and staining of pistils, slight modification were made between freshly preserved (10-15 days storing) and stored materials (beyond 15 days storing) in 70% alcohol. In the freshly stored materials, the styles were dissected from the ovary and transferred to lactophenol (lactic acid one part and phenol one part) after bringing them to water from 70% alcohol through discending alcohol grades. They were then boiled for 1 to 3 minutes till the styles became transparent. After cooling, a style was placed on a clean
glass slide. Subsequent staining of the individual style and stigma was done on the slide. The style was stained in 1% acid fuchsin in lactophenol (acid fuchsin-1gm., lactic acid-50cc and phenol-50cc). Stain was placed in sufficient quantity so as to cover the entire length of the style. The style was pressed by a scalpel and slightly warmed over the flame. The excess stain was drained off and the style was again warmed with fresh lactophenol. The excess stain was removed by the same process which continued for 2 to 3 times until most of the superfluous stain was removed from the tissue. The style was then mounted in fresh lactophenol and pressed slightly to expose the pollen tubes.
For the stored materials, the styles were brought down to water in the same way as stated above, from 70% alcohol. Before transferring them to lactophenol for boiling, the styles were placed in acidulated water (about 34 drops of conc. HCl in 10 cc of distilled water) for five minutes, then thoroughly washed, boiled in lactophenol and stained as above.
30*
462 P. Sanyal Cytologia 23
The length of the pistil in all the six species were measured on the
basis of 25 pistils for each species at their peak period of flowering. As stated earlier the pollen tube growth was, however, measured only upto the
base of the style excluding the portion of the ovary in each case.
Observation
Pistil length:The average length of the carpels separately for ovary, style, style-arm
and stigma and their total mean in each of the six species namely, can
nabinus, sabdariffa, radiatus, lunariifolius, panduraeformis and vitifolius
are given below in Table 1.
Table 1. Comparative length of pistil of six species of Hibiscus in millimetre
From table 1 it is observed that H. radiatus has got the maximum
length of pistil (27.94mm) and the minium is in H. sabdariffa (12.5mm).
It is also noted that due to the variations in the pistil length, the distance
travelled by the pollen tubes to reach the base of the style in vivo also
varied in different species. Thus in both self-pollination of H. radiatus and
its crosses with other species of Hibiscus, the pollen tubes travelled a maximum
distance of 23.04mm. Similarly a minimum distance of 7.9mm was travelled
by the pollen tubes in the case of H. sabdariffa.
Nature of pollen tube growth in the controlled selfings and cross coatings
In both selfings and crosses, actual measurement of the length of pollen
tubes (average) travelled in each case was recorded with the help of the
ocular micrometre. The average length of the pollen tubes were measured
on the basis of 15 pollen tubes in each case which could be easily traced.
These observations were calculated in/u and further converted in to millimetre
readings in Table 2 for convenience.
The data on the above pollen tube growth in both selfings as well as
the crosses where pollen germination was found to occur (Table 2) have also
been graphically represented in Fig. 1.
The nature of pollen tubes in both self and cross-matings by no means
were of uniform size. A variation in thickness was found to occur in the
pollen tubes; some appeared thread-like (4-5/u approximately) under •~90
1958 Pollen Tube Growth in Hibiscus in vivo 463
magnification, others as broad as 23.1/u . The pollen tubes were found to be full of starch
grains and stained deep blue with
iodine. In all the
selfed styles, in
general, it was noted that the
pollen grains germinate profusely and the number of pollen tubes
were more than
in the crosses
(Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5).
In addition to
the above crosses
(Table 2) where the pollen tube
growth was found to occur, similar records on the
Fig. 1. Graph showing the behaviour of pollen tube growth in
different self and cross matings of Hibiscus in vivo.
Abbreviations: H. C.=H. cannabinus; H. S.=H. sabdariffa; H.
R.=H. radiatus; H. P.=H. panduraeformis; H. L.=H. lunarii
folius; H. V.=H. vitifolius; R•~C=radiatus•~cannabinus; R•~S=
radiatus•~sabdarifa; S•~C=sabdarifa•~cannabinus; S•~R=sab
dariffa•~radiatus; C•~S=cannabinus•~sabdarifa; C•~R=can
nabinus•~radiatus.
Table 2. Actual length travelled in millimetre by the pollen tubes in both self and cross
matings at different intervals of pollination
464 P. Sanyal Cytologia 23
Figs. 2-5. 2, showing pollen tube growth in H. cannabinus (selfed) after 15 minutes of
pollination in vivo. •~90. 3, showing pollen tube growth in H. radiatus (selfed) after 45
minutes of pollination in vivo. •~90. 4, showing pollen tube growth (only two tubes shown
separately) in cannabinus•~sabdariffa cross after 30 minutes of pollination in vivo. •~90.
5, showing pollen tube growth in radiatus•~cannabinus cross after 30 minutes of pollination
in vivo. •~90.
pollen germination were kept in the remaining other crosses between different species of Hibiscus employed in the present investigation. These observations
were recorded till three hours after pollination at regular intervals but no pollen
tube germination was found to occur in the following interspecific cross:-
Cannabinus with lunariifolius, panduraeformis and vitifolius;Sabdariffa with lunariifolius, panduraeformis and vitifolius;Radiatus with lunariifolius, panduraeformis and vitifolius;Lunariifolius with cannabinus, sabdariffa and radiatus;Panduraeformis with cannabinus, sabdariffa and radiatus;Vitifolius with cannabinus, sabdariffa and radiatus;Lunariifolius with panduraeformis and vitifolius;
1958 Pollen Tube Growth in Hibiscus in vivo 465
Figs. 6-9. 6, showing pollen tube growth in radiates•~cannabinnus cross after 15 minutes
of pollination in vivo. •~90. 7, showing the germination of only 1 or 2 pollen grains in can
nabinus•~radiatus cross after 10 minutes of pollination in vivo. •~90. 8, showing pollen
tube growth in sabdariffa x radiatus cross after 15 minutes of pollination in vivo. •~90.
9, showing pollen tube growth in radiatus•~sabdarifffa cross after 45 minutes of pollination
in vivo. •~90.
Panduraeformis with lunariifolius and vitifolius;
Vitifolius with lunariifolius and panduraefornzis.
Position of the pollen tubes in relation to style length in selfings and crosses
at different intervals
From the above, it is indicated that the length of the pollen tube at different intervals in the self-matings show no germination after first five
minutes in all cases excepting in H. radiatus where germination takes place
after 10 minutes of pollination. In all cases it was found that within 30 to
45 minutes pollen tubes reach the base of the style.
In cross-matings the pollen tubes enter the stigma and stylar tissue after
466 P. Sanyal Cytologia 23
five minutes excepting the cannabinus•~radiatus cross where it enters after
10 minutes (Fig. 7) but a slight difference in the behaviour of the growing
pollen tubes is noted in the crosses. On the H. cannabinus style, the sab
dariffa pollen reaches the base of the style in 30 minutes while the radiatus
pollen reaches the full length in one hour. The cannabinus pollen or radiatus
pollen on sabdariffa style reaches the base of the style within 15 minutes
(Fig. 8) in both the cases showing that sabdariffa style is more favourable
for the pollen germination of both cannabinus and radiatus. The pollen of
cannabinus also grows favourably and reaches the stylar base within 15
minutes inside the style of H. radiatus thus showing that cannabinus pollen
is more receptive to growth in the styles of sabdariffa or radiatus. The
pollen of sabdariffa, however, showed delayed growth in the style of radiatus
(Fig. 9) where it reaches the base after 45 minutes as compared to in the
cannabinus style where it reaches within 30 minutes. It may, therefore, be
noted that pollen of sabdariffa is more favourably grown in cannabinus style
than in the radiatus style.
In case of crosses of lunariifolius, panduraeformis and vitifolius with
the above three species namely, cannabinus, sabdariffa and radiatus both
as male or female parent there is no germination of pollens on the styles.
Discussion and conclusion
From the behaviour of pollen tube study in the cross-matings between
six species of Hibiscus, it may be said in general that the three species, viz.,
cannabinus, sabdariffa and radiatus show reciprocal receptivity of pollen
germination and growth in the stigma and stylar tissue, thus indicating that
no stylar incompatibility is involved. On the other hand, the pollen tubes
fail to germinate and do not enter inside the stylar tissue when either the
remaining three species namely, lunariifolius, panduraeformis and vitifolius
are crossed amongst themselves or in their crosses with cannabinus, sab
dariffa and radiatus. The cause of the failure of pollen tube growth may
be difinitely attributed to the stylar incompatibility in the latter crosses.
In the light of the data of pollen tube growth from the above study
between H. cannabinus•~H. sabdariffa and their reciprocal crosses it may
be inferred that the cross incompatibility between these two fibre-yielding
species of Hibiscus is not due to any hindrance of free pollen germination
and growth in the stigma and style. A further investigation on the em
bryological study of these crosses was, therefore, undertaken by the present
author and its results have been sent for publication elsewhere.
Summary
Pollen tube growth in vivo of both selfings (controls) and crosses be
tween six species of Hibiscus namely, cannabinus, sabdariffa, radiatus,
lunariifolius, panduraeformis and vitifolius are reported here.
1958 Pollen Tube Growth in Hibiscus in vivo 467
From the behaviour of pollen tube study it is observed that the three
species, viz., cannabinus, sabdariffa and radiatus show reciprocal receptivity
of pollen germination and growth in the style indicating thereby that no
stylar incompatibility is involved in these crosses. In the crosses of other
three species, viz., lunariifolius, panduraeformis and vitifolius there is a
definite stylar incompatibility between the species themselves as well as their
crosses with other three species namely, cannabinus, sabdariffa and radiatus.
In the selfed styles no germination of pollen occurs after five minutes
of pollination excepting in H. radiatus where germination takes place after
10 minutes of pollination. All the pollen tubes, however, reach the base of
the style within 30 to 45 minutes after pollination.
In the crosses also the germination of pollen starts after five minutes
excepting in the cross cannabinus•~radiatus where it starts after 10 minutes
of pollination.
The rate of growth of pollen tubes in the self and crossmatings with
different species of Hibiscus is also found to be slightly different.
Acknowledgement
I wish to express my sincere thanks to Dr. B. C. Kundu, Director, Jute
Agricultural Research Institute under whose guidance the present investigation
was worked out for the D. Phil degree of the Calcutta University.
References
Darlington, C. D. and Wylie, A. P. 1955. Chromosome atlas of flowering plants, George Allen and Unwin Ltd. London.
Deshpande, R. B. 1938. Studies in Indian fibre plants. 5. Further studies on the inheritance of certain characters in Hibiscus sabdarijfa L. Indian. Jour. Agr. Sci. 8: 229-243.
*Kist , J. M. and Friederich, J. C. 1947. De culture van enkele bast en blavezellevende gewassen, Landbouwk Ti jdschr. 9: 337-345.
Sanyal, P. 1957. Study on the cytological, genetical and cultural aspects of fibre yielding Hibiscus. Dissertation for D. Phil., Calcutta University.
Toxopeus, H. J. 1948. Preliminary account of the results of some species crosses in Hibiscus. Genetica 24: 1: 90-92.
* Publications not seen in original.