study program to evaluate the prevention of ischemia with direct anti-xa inhibition: sepia-acs1 –...
TRANSCRIPT
SStudy program to tudy program to EEvaluate the valuate the PPrevention revention of of IIschemia with direct schemia with direct AAnti-Xa inhibition:nti-Xa inhibition:
SEPIA-ACS1 – TIMI 42SEPIA-ACS1 – TIMI 42A randomized, double-blind, triple-dummy, dose-ranging study to
evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of OTAMIXABAN in patients with NSTEACS and planned early invasive strategy
1
Marc S. Sabatine, MD, MPH
on behalf of the SEPIA-ACS1 TIMI 42 Investigators
M Sabatine has received honoraria and consulting fees from sanofi-aventis and honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb.
SEPIA-ACS1 TIMI 42 was supported by a research grant from sanofi-aventis
2
Extrinsic PathwayTissue factor, FVII
Thrombin(F IIa)
Fibrin FormationPlatelet Aggregation
Intrinsic PathwayFXII, FXI, FIX, FVIII, PL, Ca2+
Prothrombin(F II)
Factor V
OTAMIXABAN• Specific, Direct, IV, Factor Xa Inhib
– Proximal inhib of coag cascade
• Small molecule– Inhibits clot-bound factor Xa,
which is inaccessible tolarge molecule & indirect inhibitors
• Favorable PK/PD profile– Short-acting (half-life 30 min)– Wt-based bolus & infusion– No need for monitoring– No significant renal elimination
Common PathwayFactor X Factor Xa
Coagulation Cascade
Clinical Efficacy CompositeClinical Efficacy Composite
5.8
3.8
2.5
5.15.6
7.1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
OTAM0.035
OTAM0.065
OTAM0.120
OTAM0.160
OTAM0.200
UFH
Dea
th,
MI,
or
Urg
Rev
asc(
%)
Cohen M et al. Circulation 2007:115:26423
947 patients undergoing non-urgent PCIGreater reduction in thrombin generation w/ OTAM vs. UFH
mg/kg/hr
Study Design:Study Design:Phase II, Dose-RangingPhase II, Dose-Ranging
Mod-to-High Risk NSTE ACS (ST deviation or biomarker)w/ Planned Early Invasive Strategy
OTAM0.035
(n=125)
OTAM0.035
(n=125)
RAspirin +
Clopidogrel
Blinded bail-out eptifibatide if
rec. ischemia or thrombotic
complic. during PCI
OTAM / UFH until end of PCI (or longer if indic)
Eptifibatide until 18-24 h after end of PCI
1° EP: Death, MI, Urgent Revasc, Bail-out IIb/IIIa thru 7 d1° EP: Death, MI, Urgent Revasc, Bail-out IIb/IIIa thru 7 d
Coronary angiography PCI within 3 daysCoronary angiography PCI within 3 days
OTAM0.070
(n=676)
OTAM0.070
(n=676)
OTAM0.140
(n=658)
OTAM0.140
(n=658)
OTAM0.175
(n=671)
OTAM0.175
(n=671)
OTAM0.105
(n=662)
OTAM0.105
(n=662)
UFH + Eptifi.(n=449)
UFH + Eptifi.(n=449)
at or before randomization
Follow-up at Day 30, Day 90, Day 180Follow-up at Day 30, Day 90, Day 1804
double-blind
Major Exclusion CriteriaMajor Exclusion Criteria
• Treatment with anticoagulant during index presentation for >24 h prior to randomization
• Requirement for treatment with an oral anticoagulant
• Contraindications to eptifibatide:– bleeding w/in previous 30 days or known bleeding diathesis
– severe hypertension (SBP >200 mmHg or DBP >110 mmHg)
– major surgery or trauma in the past 6 wks
– history of stroke in the past 30 d or any history of hemorrhagic stroke
– creatinine clearance <30 ml/min or dependence on renal dialysis
• Platelet count <100,000/ul; INR 2
• Prior PCI within 30 days of randomization
• Cardiogenic shock5
Trial OrganizationTrial Organization
6
TIMI Study GroupBrigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical School
E Braunwald, MD (Chair)MS Sabatine, MD, MPH (PI)EM Antman, MD (Co-PI)CH McCabe (Director)S Crugnale (Project Manager)CF Contant (Director of Biostats)
Clinical Events Cmte SD Wiviott, MD (Chair)
Data Monitoring Cmte P Theroux, MD (Chair)JP BassandS Kelsey
SponsorSanofi-Aventis
A Moryusef, M Brynildsen, S Hitier, T Colineau, S Ribadeau-Dumas,P Taistra, C Mahdi
Steering CommitteeSteering Committee
7
Argentina JL Navaro Estrada Israel H Hod
Brazil JC Nicolau Italy G DeFerrari
Canada S Goodman Mexico F Petersen
Chile R Corbalan Netherlands F Verheugt
Croatia M Bergovec Poland W Ruzyllo
Czech Republic P Widimsky Portugal R Ferreira
Denmark P Clemmensen Russia M Ruda
Estonia J Voitk South Africa IO Ebrahim
Finland I Tierala South Korea M Jeong
France G Montalescot Southeast Asia R Zambahari
Germany C Bode Spain J Ruiz-Nodar
Greece D Alexopoulos Turkey Z Ongen
Hungary RG Kiss United States MS Sabatine
India BS Raju
Worldwide ParticipationWorldwide Participation
8
151
69
115
64
3
1128
8
391
5
15
35
43
157
19
220
88
17173
252
93
10
24
161 9871
91
25
129
125
19
102
112
65169
196 Sites36 countries
3241 Patients Randomized
Baseline CharacteristicsBaseline Characteristics
Variable ValueAge, yrs 61 ± 12
Male, % 69
Hypertension, % 70
Dyslipidemia, % 50
Current smoker, % 32
Diabetes mellitus, % 29
Prior MI, % 21
Creatinine clearance, ml/min 95 ± 36
ST segment deviation ≥ 0.1 mV, % 57
Elevated cardiac biomarker of necrosis, % 77
9No clinically relevant imbalances between treatment arms
MedicationsMedications
Treatment ValueStudy Med Duration, median (IQR) hr
OTAM / placebo & UFH / placebo 5 (4-19) hrs
Eptifibatide / placebo 21 (8-26) hrs
Aspirin, % 98
Clopidogrel, % 98
Dosed before angiography 95
Open label anticoag before study med*, % 65
UFH 34
LMWH 35
-blocker, % 83
Statin, % 8710*Patients could have received more than 1 type of anticoagulant prior to study med
Cardiac ProceduresCardiac Procedures
11
66
51
28
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3 or 4 Never
Co
ron
ary
An
gio
gra
ph
y (
%)
Hospital Day
99%
PCI(63%)
Med Rx(34%)
CABG(3.6%)
Coronary Treatment
Primary Efficacy EndpointPrimary Efficacy EndpointDeath, MI, Urg Revasc, or Bailout GP IIb/IIIaDeath, MI, Urg Revasc, or Bailout GP IIb/IIIa
7.2
3.8 3.64.3
6.2
4.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
OTAM0.035
OTAM0.070
OTAM0.105
OTAM0.140
OTAM0.175
UFH +eptifi
De
ath
, M
I, U
rg R
ev
, B
ail
ou
t th
ru 7
d (
%)
1.16(0.56-2.38)
0.74(0.45-1.21)
0.61(0.36-1.02)
0.58(0.34-0.996)
0.69(0.42-1.15)
P=0.34 for trend across OTAM Dose Arms
RR vs UFH(95% CI)
12
n=125 n=676 n=662 n=658 n=671 n=449
RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.38-0.94)P=0.02
mg/kg/hr
Primary Endpoint over 180 DaysPrimary Endpoint over 180 Days
13
Cum
ulat
ive
inci
denc
e
OTAM 0.035
OTAM 0.070OTAM 0.175
OTAM 0.140OTAM 0.105
UFH+Eptifi
Death or MIDeath or MI
4.8
2.6 2.7 2.8
4.9
2.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
OTAM0.035
OTAM0.070
OTAM0.105
OTAM0.140
OTAM0.175
UFH +eptifi
De
ath
or
MI
thru
7 d
(%
)
0.98(0.41-2.36)
0.57(0.31-1.05)
0.52(0.28-0.98)
0.56(0.30-1.03)
0.58(0.32-1.06)
RR vs UFH(95% CI)
14
n=125 n=676 n=662 n=658 n=671 n=449
RR 0.54 (95% CI 0.32-0.91)P=0.02
mg/kg/hr
Urgent RevascularizationUrgent Revascularization
0.8 0.80.3
0.6 0.70.3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
OTAM0.035
OTAM0.070
OTAM0.105
OTAM0.140
OTAM0.175
UFH +eptifi
Urg
en
t R
ev
as
cu
lari
zati
on
th
ru 7
d (
%)
15
n=125 n=676 n=662 n=658 n=671 n=449
mg/kg/hr
Bailout GP IIb/IIIa InhibitorBailout GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor
3.2
1.40.8
1.2 1.1
2.2
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
OTAM0.035
OTAM0.070
OTAM0.105
OTAM0.140
OTAM0.175
UFH +eptifi
Ba
ilo
ut
GP
IIb
/III
a t
hru
7 d
(%
)
16
n=125 n=676 n=662 n=658 n=671 n=449
mg/kg/hr
2.87(0.78-5.44)
1.99(0.73-5.44)
RR vs UFH(95% CI)
Thrombotic ComplicationsThrombotic Complications
6.2
2.93.5 3.2
2.4
5.0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
OTAM0.035
OTAM0.070
OTAM0.105
OTAM0.140
OTAM0.175
UFH +eptifi
Th
rom
bo
tic
Co
mp
lic
ati
on
(%
)
17
n=81 n=417 n=419 n=396 n=433 n=286
mg/kg/hr
2.52(0.82-7.74)
2.06(0.89-4.78)
RR vs UFH(95% CI)
PCI Subset, PCI Subset, n=2032 (63%)n=2032 (63%)
Defined as: abrupt or side branch closure, distal embolization or no/slow reflow, or new thrombus
Primary Safety EndpointPrimary Safety EndpointTIMI Major or Minor Bleed unrelated to CABGTIMI Major or Minor Bleed unrelated to CABG(defined as (defined as bleed with in Hgb of 3 g/dL or ICH)
1.6
3.13.4
5.4
2.7
1.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
OTAM0.035
OTAM0.070
OTAM0.105
OTAM0.140
OTAM0.175
UFH +eptifi
Pri
ma
ry S
afe
ty E
nd
po
int
thru
7 d
(%
)
0.61(0.14-2.70)
0.61(0.27-1.38)
1.15(0.57-2.32)
1.26(0.63-2.52)
2.02(1.07-3.85)
P=0.0001 for trendacross OTAM Dose Arms
RR vs UFH(95% CI)
18
n=122 n=669 n=651 n=651 n=664 n=448
mg/kg/hr
TIMI Minimal BleedingTIMI Minimal Bleeding (defined as any overt (defined as any overt bleed with in Hgb of <3 g/dL)
4.1
10.9 11.8
15.8
5.66.7
0
5
10
15
20
OTAM0.035
OTAM0.070
OTAM0.105
OTAM0.140
OTAM0.175
UFH +eptifi
TIM
I M
inim
al
Ble
ed
ing
th
ru 7
d (
%)
19
n=122 n=669 n=651 n=651 n=664 n=448
mg/kg/hr
RBC TransfusionRBC Transfusion
6.66.1
7.78.3
9.2
6.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
OTAM0.035
OTAM0.070
OTAM0.105
OTAM0.140
OTAM0.175
UFH +eptifi
Tra
ns
fus
ion
th
rou
gh
7 d
(%
)
20
n=122 n=669 n=651 n=651 n=664 n=448
mg/kg/hr
ConclusionsConclusions
We achieved our goal of defining the optimaldose range of otamixaban for future study
OTAM0.035
OTAM0.035
OTAM0.070
OTAM0.070
Inadequate anticoagulation
OTAM0.175
OTAM0.175
Excessive bleeding
OTAM0.140
OTAM0.140
OTAM0.105
OTAM0.105
Decreased risk of death or ischemic events,
with comparable risk of maj/min bleeding c/w UFH + eptifi
Otamixaban 0.105-0.140 mg/kg/h appears to be best range for further study as a replacement for UFH + GP IIb/IIIa
21
22
THE LANCET
Available at www.thelancet.com
Presentation slides available at www.timi.org