study rationale
DESCRIPTION
Early palliative care improves quality of life, reduces aggressiveness of care at the end-of-life and prolongs survival in stage IV NSCLC patients: Results of a phase III randomized trial. Temel JS, Greer JA, Gallagher E, Admane S, Pirl WF, Jackson VA, Dahlin C, Muzikansky A, Jacobsen J, Lynch TJ. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Early palliative care improves quality of life, reduces aggressiveness of care at the end-
of-life and prolongs survival in stage IV NSCLC patients:
Results of a phase III randomized trial
Temel JS, Greer JA, Gallagher E, Admane S, Pirl WF, Jackson VA, Dahlin C, Muzikansky A, Jacobsen J, Lynch
TJ
Study Rationale
Current Care Model
Proposed Care Model
www.iom.edu
50 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC
Meet with palliative care at least monthly during 1st 6 months of
care
Temel, JCO (25)17, 2007
Integrated Oncology and Palliative Care in the Ambulatory Care Setting
150 patients
with newly diagnosed metastatic
NSCLC
Early palliative care integrated with standard oncology care
Standard oncology care
Baseline Data Collection
RANDOMIZED
Study Design
Meet with palliative care within 3 weeks of signing consent and at least monthly thereafter
Meet with palliative care only when requested by patient, family or oncology clinician.
Early Palliative Care Study Procedures
Palliative Care Guidelines
Illness understanding and education Inquire about illness and prognostic understanding Offer clarification regarding treatment goals
Symptom management Pain Pulmonary symptoms Fatigue and sleep disturbance Mood Gastrointestinal
Decision-making Assess mode of decision-making Assist with treatment decision-making
Coping with life-threatening illness Patient Family/family caregivers
www.nationalconsensusproject.org
Study Objectives
Primary Objective: Measure the difference in QOL between the
two study arms at 12 weeks.
Secondary Objectives: 1. Psychological distress at 12 weeks2. Quality of end-of-life care 3. Resource utilization at the end-of-life4. Documentation of resuscitation preference in
the medical record
Study Eligibility
1. Metastatic NSCLC diagnosed within the previous 8 weeks.
2. ECOG performance status 0-2.3. Ability to read and respond to
questions in English.4. Planning to receive oncology care at
the participating institution.
Study Measures
Quality of life FACT-Lung - Lower scores indicative of greater symptom
burden Lung Cancer Symptom (LCS): lung cancer specific symptoms Trial Outcome Index (TOI): LCS and functional and physical well-
being
Psychological Distress Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Score of > 8 of each subscale indicative of symptoms of depression or anxiety
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Evaluates symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) using
DSM-IV criteria.
Data Collection
Measures of health care utilization were collected from electronic medical records. Use of anti-cancer therapies Hospital and emergency room visits Dates of hospice referral Date and location of death Documentation of resuscitation preference
Sample Size Calculation
Sample size was calculated to detect a clinically meaningful change in QOL, defined as a medium effect size of 0.5 SD.
120 patients were required to have 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.5 SD in FACT-Lung TOI.
Due to rapid accrual, the study was amended to add an additional 30 patients.
Data were analyzed through 12/1/09.
Statistical Analysis
Differences between study arms in clinical outcomes were assessed with two-sided Fisher’s Exact tests for categorical variables and independent-samples t-tests for continuous variables.
For ITT analyses, baseline values were carried forward for missing patient-reported outcome data.
Survival time was calculated from the date of consent to date of death using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Differences in survival were tested with Log Rank and Cox Proportional Hazard Model.
Study Flow
Assessed for eligibility (N=283)
June 2006 – July 2009
Excluded (n=9)Not offered (n=60)Refused to participate (n=59)Study closed during eligibility (n=4)
Randomly assigned (N=151)
Palliative care (N=77) Standard care (N=74)
12 week QOL assessment:47 completed (64%)17 died (23%)10 did not complete (13%)
12 week QOL assessment:60 completed (78%)10 died (13%)7 not completed (9%)
Sample Demographics Standard Care N=74
Mean (SD) or N (%)
Early Palliative Care N=77
Mean (SD) or N (%)
p-value
Age Mean (SD) 64.9 (9.4) 65.0 (9.7) 0.94
Female 36 (49) 42 (55) 0.47
Race White African American Asian
70 (95)3 (4)1 (1)
77 (100)0 (0)0 (0)
0.06
Ethnicity Hispanic 1 (1) 1 (1) 1.00
Marital Status Married Single Divorced/Separated Widowed
45 (61)9 (12)12 (16)8 (10)
48 (62)9 (12)12 (16)8 (10)
1.00
Patient Demographics
Clinical Characteristics Standard Care N=74 N (%)
Early Palliative CareN=77N (%)
p-value
ECOG PS: 0 1 2
30 (41)35 (47)9 (12)
26 (34)46 (60)5 (6)
0.24
Brain Metastasis: Yes No
19 (26)55 (74)
24 (31)53 (69)
0.46
Initial Anticancer Therapy: Platinum-Based Regimen Single Agent Chemotherapy Oral EGFR-TKI Radiation Both Chemo and Radiation No Chemotherapy
35 (47)3 (4)6 (8)
26 (35)3 (4)1 (1)
35 (45)9 (12)6 (8)
27 (35)0 (0)0 (0)
0.82
Type of Initial Chemotherapy Regimen: Standard Therapy Clinical Trial
35 (75) 12 (25)
36 (72)14 (28)
0.78
Baseline Clinical Characteristics
Variable Standard CareM (SD) or N (%)
Early Palliative Care
M (SD) or N (%)
p-value
FACT-Lung 91.7 (16.7) 93.6 (16.5) 0.50
Trial Outcome Index (TOI) 55.3 (13.1) 56.2 (13.4) 0.67
HADS Symptoms
Depression 18 (25) 17 (22) 0.67
Anxiety 24 (33) 28 (36) 0.70
Major Depressive Disorder 12 (17) 9 (12) 0.40
Baseline Quality of Life and Psychological Distress
Palliative Care Visits by 12 Weeks
Palliative Care Visits Standard Care (N=74)N (%)
Early Palliative Care (N=77)N (%)
None 64 (87) 1 (1)*
1 7 (9) 0
2 3 (4) 8 (10)
3 0 18 (23)
4 0 26 (34)
> 5 0 24 (31)* Died within 2 weeks of enrollment
12-week Quality of Life Measures
Variable Standard CareN=47
M (SD)
Early Palliative CareN=60
M (SD)
Effect Size
(Cohen’s d)
p-value
FACT-Lung 91.5 (15.8) 98.0 (15.1) 0.42 .03
Lung Cancer Symptoms (LCS)
19.3 (4.2) 21.0 (3.9) 0.42 .04
Trial Outcome Index (TOI)
53.0 (11.5) 59.0 (11.6) 0.52 0.009
Effect of Early PC on 12-week Psychological Distress
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Depression Major DepressiveDisorder
Anxiety
Standard Care
Early Palliative Care
p=0.01
p=0.66
p=0.04
Change in QOL from Baseline to 12 Weeks
Mean change Early Palliative Care = + 2.3
Mean change Standard Care = - 2.3
p=0.04
Mean change Early Palliative Care = + 4.2
Mean change Standard Care = - 0.4
p=0.09
FACT-Lung FACT- Lung TOI
Quality of EOL Care and Resource Utilization
ASCO Quality Measures 1. No hospice2. Enrolled in hospice < 3 days before death 3. Chemotherapy within 14 days of death (DOD)
Measure Standard CareN (%) or Median
Early Palliative Care
N (%) or Median
p-value
Aggressive EOL Care No hospice Hospice < 3 days Chemo within 14 DOD
30 (54)22 (39)5 (15) 12 (24)
16 (33)15 (31)1 (3) 7 (18)
0.05
Hospital/ER Admissions within 30 DOD
31 (55) 19 (39) 0.12
Days on hospice 4 (0-269) 11 (0-117) 0.09
Documented Resuscitation Preference
11 (28) 18 (53) 0.05105 deaths at time of data analysis with data on chemotherapy within 14 DOD available on 90 patients
Standard care
Survival Analysis
Months
Overa
ll su
rviv
al
Median SurvivalEarly palliative care 11.6 moStandard care 8.9 mo
p=0.02Early palliative care
Controlling for age, gender and PS, adjusted HR=0.59 (0.40-0.88), p=0.01
Study Limitations
Single, tertiary-care site with a specialized group of clinicians.
Study population lacked racial/ethnic diversity. Randomized design but no blinding to study
arm. Small number of patients on standard care
arm seen by palliative care team. Survival was not a pre-specified study
endpoint. Lack of information on mediators of patient-
reported and medical outcomes.
Summary
Compared with standard oncology care, integrated palliative care led to: Improvements in QOL Lower rates of depression Less aggressive care at the end-of-life Greater documentation of resuscitation
preferences Higher survival rates
Discussion
Changes in QOL may be due to improved symptom management.
Decreased rates of depression may be related to improved symptom management and illness acceptance.
Prolonged survival possibly related to: Earlier recognition and management of medical
issues Improved QOL and mood Less chemotherapy at the end-of-life Longer hospice admissions
Acknowledgements
Funding Provided by: ASCO Foundation Golf Fights Cancer The Joanne Hill Monahan Fund
Supportive Care Research Group at Massachusetts General Hospital
William Pirl, MD, MPH Joseph Greer, Ph.D Inga Lennes MD Emily Gallagher, BS Sonal Admane, MBBS, MPH Elyse Park, Ph.D Areej El-Jawahri, MD
Center for Palliative Care at Massachusetts General Hospital
Andrew J. Billings MD Vicki Jackson MD Connie Dahlin ANP Craig Blinderman, MD Juliet Jacobsen, MD Amelia Cullinan, MD Sandy Nasrallah, MD
Thoracic Oncology at Massachusetts General Hospital
Panos Fidias, MD Alice Shaw, MD, Ph.D Rebecca Heist, MD Lecia Sequist, MD Jeff Engelman, MD, Ph.D David Barbie, MD, Ph.D. Inga Lennes, MD Elizabeth Lamont, MD Jeanne Vaughn, ANP Diane Doyle, ANP Patricia Ostler R.N Thoracic Oncology research nurses,
administrators and staff
Yale Cancer Center Thomas J. Lynch, MD