study results wyoming firmed resource option this slide deck contains results from the 2012 teppc...

46
Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource Option studies. The generation results for the associated transmission expansion projects follow immediately after, along with flow information for the added transmission.

Upload: natalia-youell

Post on 01-Apr-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Study Results

Wyoming Firmed Resource Option

This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource Option studies. The generation results for the associated transmission expansion projects follow immediately after, along with flow information for the added transmission.

Page 2: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Gas FirmingModeling Goal

Allow incremental gas CT’s (located in WY) to dispatch based on economics. Using a nomogram, force their output down DC lines (with wind).

Implementation StepsStart with 2022 PC21 Wyoming Resource Option (+12,000 GWh)

1. Add 1,000 MW of incremental gas CC’s physically located in WY• Economic dispatch based on where DC line terminates • Standard “CC Recent” modeling

2. Remove CT’s no longer needed for PRM • PRM may have been supplemented by added CC’s• Remove CT’s from region where DC line terminates• Essentially assume DC line assures delivery

4. Use nomogram to force both wind and CC dispatch down DC line• DC Line Flow ≥ Added Wind + Added CTs

Page 3: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Add: 12,000 GWh to meet WECC RPS

Add transmission

Renewable Options Under High Load

Firmed Cases

Increase WECC-wide load 8%

1

2

4

For these regions

3 Add: firming resource

Gas

Hydro

Pumped storage

Page 4: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Increase WECC-wide load 8%1

2010 2022800,000

850,000

900,000

950,000

1,000,000

1,050,000

1,100,000

Western Interconnection Annual Energy (GWh)10-Year Study Comparison

Common Case LRS

An

nu

al E

ner

gy

(GW

h)

8%

8% increase to peak and energy

10%

10% decrease to energy

Higher Load = Additional RPS Energy

Page 5: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Calculate ratios of planned renewables in TEPPC 2022 Common Case • Do not include existing resources• Did not include DG• IRP and LRS data

Apply ratio to study build-out of 12,000 GWh• Concept: development trends are best representation of

what could be added to each state • More resources available than what is identified in WREZ• More granular information from CPUC/CAISO

Locate resources using WREZ peer-analysis tool

Extrapolation Method

Add 12,000 GWh to meet WECC RPS 2

Page 6: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

10-Year Study ResultsWyoming Firmed Resource Option Studies

EC26-1 TransWest ExpressEC26-2 Zephyr AEC26-3 Zephyr BEC26-4 Zephyr CEC26-5 Zephyr D

Zephyr A

Zephyr B

Zephyr

C

Tran

sWes

t Exp

ress

Zephyr D

Page 7: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Conventional Hydro

Pumped Storage

Steam - Coal

Steam - Other

Nuclear

Combined Cycle

Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration

IC

Negative Bus Load

Biomass RPS

Geothermal

Small Hydro RPS

Solar

Wind

(600,000) (400,000) (200,000) 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC21 Wyoming vs. 2022 EC26-1 TWE (w nomo)

GWh

Production cost decreased $21 M (.1%)

Dump energy increased 9.6 GWh (2.6%)

Emergency Energy decreased .4%

CO2 Emissions decreased .1%

AZ, NV, CA, CO

Page 8: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Conventional Hydro

Pumped Storage

Steam - Coal

Steam - Other

Nuclear

Combined Cycle

Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration

IC

Negative Bus Load

Biomass RPS

Geothermal

Small Hydro RPS

Solar

Wind

(10,000,000) (5,000,000) 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC1-5 High Load Case vs. 2022 EC26-1 TWE (w nomo)

GWh

Production cost decreased $426 M (2.4%)

Dump energy increased 54.1 GWh (16.2%)

Emergency Energy decreased .6%

CO2 Emissions decreased 1.3%

NV, CA, CO

Page 9: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Alberta

Arizon

a

British

Colu

mbia

Califo

rnia

Colora

do

Idah

o

Mex

ico

Mon

tana

Nevad

a

New M

exico

Orego

n

South

Dak

ota

Texas

Utah

Was

hingt

on

Wyo

ming

-6,000,000

-4,000,000

-2,000,000

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC1-5 High Load Case vs. 2022 EC26-1 TWE (w nomo)

Hydro+PS Steam - Boiler Combined Cycle Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration Renewable Other

GWh

What is different?LoadsTransmissionResources

Page 10: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Alberta

Arizon

a

British

Colu

mbia

Califo

rnia

Colora

do

Idah

o

Mex

ico

Mon

tana

Nevad

a

New M

exico

Orego

n

South

Dak

ota

Texas

Utah

Was

hingt

on

Wyo

ming

-2,500,000

-2,000,000

-1,500,000

-1,000,000

-500,000

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC21 Wyoming vs. 2022 EC26-1 TWE (w nomo)

Hydro+PS Steam - Boiler Combined Cycle Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration Renewable Other

GWh

What is different?LoadsTransmissionResources

Page 11: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

9 369 729 10891449180921692529288932493609396943294689504954095769612964896849720975697929828986490

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Full Year Flow ResultsTWE

CC Total

Wind Total

Interstate TWE

Interstate TWE

Page 12: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

9 315 621 927 12331539184521512457276330693375368139874293459949055211551758236129643567417047735376597965827185770

100

200

300

400

500

600

Incremental CC Dispatch - EC26-2 TWE

WY Combined Cycle 1 WY Combined Cycle 2 WY Combined Cycle 1 WY Combined Cycle 2

Page 13: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 1031091151211271331391451511571631691751811870

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

End of JulyTWE

CC Total

Wind Total

Interstate TWE

1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103 109 115 121 127 133 139 145 151 157 163 1690

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Middle of NovemberTWE

CC Total

Wind Total

Interstate TWE

Page 14: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

10-Year Study ResultsWyoming Firmed Resource Option Studies

EC26-1 TransWest ExpressEC26-2 Zephyr AEC26-3 Zephyr BEC26-4 Zephyr CEC26-5 Zephyr D

Zephyr A

Zephyr B

Zephyr

C

Tran

sWes

t Exp

ress

Zephyr D

Page 15: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Conventional Hydro

Pumped Storage

Steam - Coal

Steam - Other

Nuclear

Combined Cycle

Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration

IC

Negative Bus Load

Biomass RPS

Geothermal

Small Hydro RPS

Solar

Wind

(2,000,000)(1,500,000)(1,000,000) (500,000) 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC21 Wyoming vs. 2022 EC26-2 Zephyr A (w nomo)

GWh

Production cost decreased $160 M (.9%)

Dump energy increased 121GWh (33%)

Emergency Energy decreased .6%

CO2 Emissions decreased 0%

WY

Page 16: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Conventional Hydro

Pumped Storage

Steam - Coal

Steam - Other

Nuclear

Combined Cycle

Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration

IC

Negative Bus Load

Biomass RPS

Geothermal

Small Hydro RPS

Solar

Wind

(10,000,000) (5,000,000) 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC1-5 High Load Case vs. 2022 EC26-2 Zephyr A (w nomo)

GWh

Production cost decreased $244M (1.4%)

Dump energy increased 153 GWh (46.2%)

Emergency Energy increased .4%

CO2 Emissions decreased 1.4%

AZ, NV, CA, WA

WY

Page 17: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Alberta

Arizon

a

British

Colu

mbia

Califo

rnia

Colora

do

Idah

o

Mex

ico

Mon

tana

Nevad

a

New M

exico

Orego

n

South

Dak

ota

Texas

Utah

Was

hingt

on

Wyo

ming

-6,000,000

-4,000,000

-2,000,000

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC1-5 High Load Case vs. 2022 EC26-2 Zephyr A (w nomo)Hydro+PS Steam - Boiler Combined Cycle Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration Renewable Other

GWh

What is different?LoadsTransmissionResources

Page 18: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Alberta

Arizon

a

British

Colu

mbia

Califo

rnia

Colora

do

Idah

o

Mex

ico

Mon

tana

Nevad

a

New M

exico

Orego

n

South

Dak

ota

Texas

Utah

Was

hingt

on

Wyo

ming

-3,000,000

-2,000,000

-1,000,000

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC21 Wyoming vs. 2022 EC26-2 Zephyr A (w nomo)

Hydro+PS Steam - Boiler Combined Cycle Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration Renewable Other

GWh

What is different?LoadsTransmissionResources

Page 19: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

9 315 621 927 12331539184521512457276330693375368139874293459949055211551758236129643567417047735376597965827185770

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Full Year Flow ResultsZephyr A

Wind Total CC Total Interstate Zephyr A Interstate Zephyr A

Page 20: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

9 315 621 927 12331539184521512457276330693375368139874293459949055211551758236129643567417047735376597965827185770

100

200

300

400

500

600

Incremental CC Dispatch - EC26-2 Zephyr A

WY Combined Cycle 1 WY Combined Cycle 2 Duration 1 Duration 2

Page 21: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 1031091151211271331391451511571631691751811870

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

End of JulyZephyr A

CC Total

Wind Total

Interstate Zephyr A

1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103 109 115 121 127 133 139 145 151 157 163 1690

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Middle of NovemberZephyr A

CC Total

Wind Total

Interstate Zephyr A

Page 22: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

10-Year Study ResultsWyoming Firmed Resource Option Studies

EC26-1 TransWest ExpressEC26-2 Zephyr AEC26-3 Zephyr BEC26-4 Zephyr CEC26-5 Zephyr D

Zephyr A

Zephyr B

Zephyr

C

Tran

sWes

t Exp

ress

Zephyr D

Page 23: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Conventional Hydro

Pumped Storage

Steam - Coal

Steam - Other

Nuclear

Combined Cycle

Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration

IC

Negative Bus Load

Biomass RPS

Geothermal

Small Hydro RPS

Solar

Wind

(2,000,000)(1,500,000)(1,000,000) (500,000) 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC21 Wyoming vs. 2022 EC26-3 Zephyr B (w nomo)

GWh

Production cost decreased $150M (2.4%)

Dump energy increased 138 GWh (38%)

Emergency Energy increased .4%

CO2 Emissions decreased .1%

AZ, NV, CA

WY

Page 24: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Conventional Hydro

Pumped Storage

Steam - Coal

Steam - Other

Nuclear

Combined Cycle

Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration

IC

Negative Bus Load

Biomass RPS

Geothermal

Small Hydro RPS

Solar

Wind

(10,000,000) (5,000,000) 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC1-5 High Load Case vs. 2022 EC26-3 Zephyr B (w nomo)

GWh

Production cost decreased $254M (1.4%)

Dump energy increased 170 GWh (51%)

Emergency Energy decreased .1%

CO2 Emissions decreased 1.3%

AZ, NV, CA, WA

WY

Page 25: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Alberta

Arizon

a

British

Colu

mbia

Califo

rnia

Colora

do

Idah

o

Mex

ico

Mon

tana

Nevad

a

New M

exico

Orego

n

South

Dak

ota

Texas

Utah

Was

hingt

on

Wyo

ming

-10,000,000

-5,000,000

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC1-5 High Load Case vs. 2022 EC26-3 Zephyr B (w nomo)Hydro+PS Steam - Boiler Combined Cycle Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration Renewable Other

GWh

What is different?LoadsTransmissionResources

Page 26: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Alberta

Arizon

a

British

Colu

mbia

Califo

rnia

Colora

do

Idah

o

Mex

ico

Mon

tana

Nevad

a

New M

exico

Orego

n

South

Dak

ota

Texas

Utah

Was

hingt

on

Wyo

ming

-4,000,000

-3,000,000

-2,000,000

-1,000,000

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC21 Wyoming vs. 2022 EC26-3 Zephyr B (w nomo)

Hydro+PS Steam - Boiler Combined Cycle Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration Renewable Other

GWh

What is different?LoadsTransmissionResources

Page 27: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

9 315 621 927 12331539184521512457276330693375368139874293459949055211551758236129643567417047735376597965827185770

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Full Year Flow ResultsZephyr B

Wind Total CC Total Interstate Zephyr B Interstate Zephyr B

Page 28: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

9 315 621 927 12331539184521512457276330693375368139874293459949055211551758236129643567417047735376597965827185770

100

200

300

400

500

600

Incremental CC Dispatch - EC26-2 Zephyr B

WY Combined Cycle 1 WY Combined Cycle 2 WY Combined Cycle 1 WY Combined Cycle 2

Page 29: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 1031091151211271331391451511571631691751811870

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

End of JulyZephyr B

CC Total

Wind Total

Interstate Zephyr B

1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 1031091151211271331391451511571631690

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Middle of NovemberZephyr B

CC Total

Wind Total

Interstate Zephyr B

Page 30: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

10-Year Study ResultsWyoming Firmed Resource Option Studies

EC26-1 TransWest ExpressEC26-2 Zephyr AEC26-3 Zephyr BEC26-4 Zephyr CEC26-5 Zephyr D

Zephyr A

Zephyr B

Zephyr

C

Tran

sWes

t Exp

ress

Zephyr D

Page 31: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Conventional Hydro

Pumped Storage

Steam - Coal

Steam - Other

Nuclear

Combined Cycle

Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration

IC

Negative Bus Load

Biomass RPS

Geothermal

Small Hydro RPS

Solar

Wind

(1,500,000) (1,000,000) (500,000) 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC21 Wyoming vs. 2022 EC26-4 Zephyr C (w nomo)

GWh

Production cost decreased $118 M (.7%)

Dump energy increased 124 GWh (34%)

Emergency Energy decreased 0%

CO2 Emissions decreased 0%

AZ, NV, CA, WA

WY

Page 32: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Conventional Hydro

Pumped Storage

Steam - Coal

Steam - Other

Nuclear

Combined Cycle

Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration

IC

Negative Bus Load

Biomass RPS

Geothermal

Small Hydro RPS

Solar

Wind

(10,000,000) (5,000,000) 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC1-5 High Load Case vs. 2022 EC26-6 Zephyr C (w nomo)

GWh

Production cost decreased $286M (1.6%)

Dump energy increased 156 GWh (47%)

Emergency Energy decreased .2%

CO2 Emissions decreased 1.3%

AZ, NV, CA, WA

WY

Page 33: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Alberta

Arizon

a

British

Colu

mbia

Califo

rnia

Colora

do

Idah

o

Mex

ico

Mon

tana

Nevad

a

New M

exico

Orego

n

South

Dak

ota

Texas

Utah

Was

hingt

on

Wyo

ming

-10,000,000

-5,000,000

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC1-5 High Load Case vs. 2022 EC26-6 Zephyr C (w nomo)Hydro+PS Steam - Boiler Combined Cycle Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration Renewable Other

GWh

What is different?LoadsTransmissionResources

Page 34: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Alberta

Arizon

a

British

Colu

mbia

Califo

rnia

Colora

do

Idah

o

Mex

ico

Mon

tana

Nevad

a

New M

exico

Orego

n

South

Dak

ota

Texas

Utah

Was

hingt

on

Wyo

ming

-3,000,000

-2,000,000

-1,000,000

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC21 Wyoming vs. 2022 EC26-4 Zephyr C (w nomo)

Hydro+PS Steam - Boiler Combined Cycle Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration Renewable Other

GWh

What is different?LoadsTransmissionResources

Page 35: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

9 315 621 927 12331539184521512457276330693375368139874293459949055211551758236129643567417047735376597965827185770

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Full Year Flow ResultsZephyr C

Wind Total CC Total Interstate Zephyr C Interstate Zephyr C

Page 36: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

9 315 621 927 12331539184521512457276330693375368139874293459949055211551758236129643567417047735376597965827185770

100

200

300

400

500

600

Incremental CC Dispatch - EC26-2 Zephyr B

WY Combined Cycle 1 WY Combined Cycle 2 WY Combined Cycle 1 WY Combined Cycle 2

Page 37: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 1031091151211271331391451511571631691751811870

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

End of JulyZephyr C

CC Total

Wind Total

Interstate Zephyr C

1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 1031091151211271331391451511571631690

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Middle of NovemberZephyr C

CC Total

Wind Total

Interstate Zephyr C

Page 38: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

10-Year Study ResultsWyoming Firmed Resource Option Studies

EC26-1 TransWest ExpressEC26-2 Zephyr AEC26-3 Zephyr BEC26-4 Zephyr CEC26-5 Zephyr D

Zephyr A

Zephyr B

Zephyr

C

Tran

sWes

t Exp

ress

Zephyr D

Page 39: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Conventional Hydro

Pumped Storage

Steam - Coal

Steam - Other

Nuclear

Combined Cycle

Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration

IC

Negative Bus Load

Biomass RPS

Geothermal

Small Hydro RPS

Solar

Wind

(20,000,000) (15,000,000) (10,000,000) (5,000,000) 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC21 Wyoming vs. 2022 EC26-5 Zephyr D (w nomo)

GWh

Production cost decreased $472M (2.7%)

Dump energy increased 78 GWh (21%)

Emergency Energy increased .9%

CO2 Emissions decreased 1.6%

WY

Page 40: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Conventional Hydro

Pumped Storage

Steam - Coal

Steam - Other

Nuclear

Combined Cycle

Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration

IC

Negative Bus Load

Biomass RPS

Geothermal

Small Hydro RPS

Solar

Wind

(20,000,000) (15,000,000) (10,000,000) (5,000,000) 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC1-5 High Load Case vs. 2022 EC26-5 Zephyr D (w nomo)

GWh

Production cost decreased $68M (.3%)

Dump energy increased 110GWh (33%)

Emergency Energy increased .7%

CO2 Emissions decreased 3%

WY

Page 41: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Alberta

Arizon

a

British

Colu

mbia

Califo

rnia

Colora

do

Idah

o

Mex

ico

Mon

tana

Nevad

a

New M

exico

Orego

n

South

Dak

ota

Texas

Utah

Was

hingt

on

Wyo

ming

-20,000,000

-15,000,000

-10,000,000

-5,000,000

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC1-5 High Load Case vs. 2022 EC26-5 Zephyr D (w nomo)Hydro+PS Steam - Boiler Combined Cycle Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration Renewable Other

GWh

What is different?LoadsTransmissionResources

Page 42: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Alberta

Arizon

a

British

Colu

mbia

Califo

rnia

Colora

do

Idah

o

Mex

ico

Mon

tana

Nevad

a

New M

exico

Orego

n

South

Dak

ota

Texas

Utah

Was

hingt

on

Wyo

ming

-20,000,000

-15,000,000

-10,000,000

-5,000,000

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

Annual Energy Difference: 2022 PC21 Wyoming vs. 2022 EC26-5 Zephyr D (w nomo)

Hydro+PS Steam - Boiler Combined Cycle Combustion Turbine

Cogeneration Renewable Other

GWh

What is different?LoadsTransmissionResources

Page 43: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

9 315 621 927 12331539184521512457276330693375368139874293459949055211551758236129643567417047735376597965827185770

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Full Year Flow ResultsZephyr D

Wind Total CC Total Interstate Zephyr D Interstate Zephyr D

Page 44: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

9 315 621 927 12331539184521512457276330693375368139874293459949055211551758236129643567417047735376597965827185770

100

200

300

400

500

600

Incremental CC Dispatch - EC26-2 Zephyr D

WY Combined Cycle 1 WY Combined Cycle 2 WY Combined Cycle 1 WY Combined Cycle 2

Page 45: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 1031091151211271331391451511571631691751811870

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

End of JulyZephyr D

CC Total

Wind Total

Interstate Zephyr D

1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103 109 115 121 127 133 139 145 151 157 163 1690

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Middle of NovemberZephyr D

CC Total

Wind Total

Interstate Zephyr D

Page 46: Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource

Questions or thoughts on this study?