studying host microbial interaction in larviculture: the way … bossier.pdfstudying host microbial...

29
Studying host microbial interaction in larviculture: the way forward Peter Bossier Laboratory of Aquaculture & Artemia Reference Center, Ghent University, Belgium UGent R&D Aquaculture Consortium meeting, June 2008

Upload: others

Post on 23-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Studying host microbial interaction in larviculture:

    the way forward

    Peter Bossier

    Laboratory of Aquaculture & Artemia Reference Center,Ghent University, Belgium

    UGent R&D Aquaculture Consortium meeting, June 2008

  • How to study host-microbial interactions?

    Known micro-

    organisms

    Host

    environment

    Hostsimplification

    complex gnotobiotic

    reality?

    MC

  • Gnotobiotic systems

    • Mammals• Zebrafish• Artemia• Brachionus• Seabass and Cod (under development)

  • Gnotobiotic Artemia: GART

    Instar I

    Instar II

    Decapsulated cysts

    Decapsulation

    Axenic conditions

    Hydrated cysts

    Non-axenic conditions

    20 nauplii counted for the

    Experiments

  • Processes

    • Quorum sensing• Polyhydroxybutyric acid• Yeast-bound glucan• Heat shock proteins

  • Quorum sensing

  • What is quorum sensing?

    AHL

    luxI

    luxR

    Target gene

    Biofilm formation,

    Bioluminescence,

    Toxin production

    AHL-mediated pathway in Gram-negative bacteria

    N O

    OH

    H OH O

  • Quorum sensing and quenchingin the

    Brachionus - Turbotfood chain

  • Objectives

    • Study the effect of AHL on turbot larval survival

    • Study the effect of an N-acyl homoserine lactone(AHL) degrading bacterial mixtures (EC5) in turbotlarviculture.

  • Experiment setup

    • Egg disinfection: 0.005% glutaraldehyde + 50 mg l-1 rifampicin

    • Temperature: 16°C

    • Light intensity: 14 lux

    • Mild aeration for cones, no aeration for beakers

  • Experiment outline

    Exp Treatment

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    1 Control AHL addition

    Rifampicin Rifampicin +AHLs

    2

    3

    Aim: To investigate the mode of action of AHL mixture (1 mg l-1)

  • Survival of turbot larvae at 5 dph (Exp 1)

    No AHLAHL

    No rifampicin

    Rifampicin0

    102030405060708090

    100

    Surv

    ival

    (%)

    • No negative effect of AHLs in the presence of antibiotic

    • Effect of AHL probably through the stimulation of the virulence of opportunistic bacteria

  • Experiment outline

    Exp Treatment

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    1 Control AHL addition

    Rifampicin Rifampicin +AHLs

    2 Control AHL addition

    EC5 (added to water)

    EC5 (added to water) + AHLs

    EC5 (added to water + via rotifers)

    EC5 (added to water + via rotifers) + AHLs

    3 Control AHL addition

    EC3 (added to water + via rotifers)

    EC3 (added to water + via rotifers) + AHLs

    EC5 (added to water + via rotifers)

    EC5 (added to water + via rotifers) + AHLs

    Aim: To compare the effect of EC3 and EC5

  • Survival of turbot larvae at 7 dph (Exp 3)

    No ECEC3

    EC5

    AHL

    No AHL0

    102030405060708090

    100

    Surv

    ival

    (%)

    EC5 can neutralize the negative effect of AHLs, while EC3 cannot

  • Quorum sensing in the Artemia - Macrobrachium

    food chain

  • Effect of AHL on Macrobrachium larviculture

    Survival rate on day 8

    77.7c77.1c77.3c

    61.5bc

    48.5ab

    37.3a

    31323334353637383

    AHL+EC5 EC5 AHL+LVS3 LVS3 AHL Control

    Treatment

    Sur

    viva

    l rat

    e (%

    )

  • Effect of AHL on Macrobrachium larviculture: LSI

    Larval Stage Index (day 8)

    5.0c5.2c

    5.1c

    4.6b4.6b4.4a

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    AHL+EC5 EC5 AHL+LVS3 LVS3 AHL Control

    Treatment

    LSI

  • Conclusions• QS determines virulence in vivo as demonstrated by using

    qs mutant

    • In Artemia disruption of AI2 is sufficient to abolish virulence

    • In Brachionus disruption of AI1 and AI2 is needed

    • In larviculture of turbot and macrobrachium AHL molecules have a strong negative effect on survival

    • Added QS molecules can be quenched by AHL degrading MC

    • Is AHL mediated virulence by prevalent opportunistic pathogenic bacteria a problem in larviculture?

  • Heat shock proteins

    as

    immunostimulants?

  • YS1

    pblDnaK(constructed using pBAD

    TOPO® vectors, InvitrogenTM, USA)

    L-arabinose(0.5 mg/ml for 1 h) -

    YS2

    pDnaK(constructed using pBAD

    TOPO® vectors, InvitrogenTM , USA)

    L-arabinose(0.5 mg/ml for 4 h) DnaK

    E. colistrains Plasmids Induction

    Hsps encodedby plasmids

    Construction of bacteria over-producing DnaK

    To test the ability of E. coli overproducing DnaK to protect Artemia larvae against Vibrio infection

  • DnaK

    DnaK expression of YS1 and YS2 on SDS-PAGE

  • YS1 YS2

    Correlation

  • 0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    YS1 CTR YS1 ID YS2 CTR YS2 ID

    Surv

    ival

    (%)

    Run 1 Run 2

    • Survival of Artemia larvae fed either induced or non-induced strainYS1 was low, results similar to those obtained with non-induced YS2

    Survival after Vibrio challenge

    • A significant 2 to 3-fold increase in survival occurred when larvae fedwith arabinose-induced YS2 were exposed to V. campbellii

  • DnaK

    • DnaK accumulation correlated with enhanced survival of Artemia

    • Clearly, protection against vibrio challenge is improved by DnaK,although the possibility that other Hsps have this capability is notdiscounted

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    YS1 CTR YS1 ID YS2 CTR YS2 ID

    Surv

    ival

    (%)

    Run 1 Run 2

    Correlation of enhanced resistance vs. DnaK accumulation in bacteria

  • 38°C for 30 min

  • A B

    • Feeding HS as opposed to non-HS bacteria significantly increasedsurvival upon exposure to V. campbellii

    • Protection occurred in all HS bacterial strains employed

    1. Survival after Vibrio challenge

  • • Western blot revealed that HS increased DnaK production bybacteria

    • Higher amounts of DnaK in HS bacteria correlated withenhanced ability to promote survival of Artemia larvae

    Hsp70

    • Quantification by ELISA demonstrated that DnaK increasedfrom 2.0 - 2.3 fold in heated bacteria

    2.1 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.3

    3. DnaK accumulation in bacteria

  • • Feeding gnotobiotic Artemia with E. coli over-producing differentprokaryotic Hsps (DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE) increased larval resistance to V.campbellii

    • Immunoprobing of western blots showed that enhanced resistance toV. campbellii correlated with DnaK production in E. coli

    • A definitive role for DnaK was demonstrated by feeding Artemialarvae with transformed bacteria over-producing only this protein(YS2), with survival augmented approximately 3-fold after pathogenicvibrio exposure

    • Exogenous Hsps possibly trigger the Artemia innate immuneresponse, producing anti-inflammatory substances which suppressinfection

  • GENERAL CONCLUSIONS

    • Gnotobiotic systems allow to test novel strategies for disease abatement in larviculture

    • Potential treatment that deserve to be tested in non-gnotobiotic environments are

    • Quorum sensing interference

    • polyhyroxybutyric acid

    •Yeast cell wall bound glucan

    •Heat shock proteins

    Slide Number 1How to study host-microbial interactions?Gnotobiotic systemsSlide Number 10ProcessesQuorum sensingSlide Number 13Quorum sensing and quenching�in the �Brachionus - Turbot �food chainSlide Number 39Slide Number 40Slide Number 41Slide Number 42Slide Number 43Slide Number 44Quorum sensing in the �Artemia - Macrobrachium �food chainEffect of AHL on Macrobrachium larvicultureEffect of AHL on Macrobrachium larviculture: LSIConclusionsSlide Number 55Slide Number 56Slide Number 57Slide Number 58Slide Number 59Slide Number 60Slide Number 61Slide Number 62Slide Number 64Slide Number 65Slide Number 75