subject: re: [moderation #142693] arxiv: submit/1106261 ...subject: re: [moderation #142693] arxiv:...

Subject: Re: [moderation #142693] arXiv: submit/1106261 removed

Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 00:37:17 +0300

Message-ID:

CAM7EkxnZRxiboCdw39VraWwev+j8OCNZ2h2YpmqfrS+jo=mHoA@mail.gmail.com

In-Reply-To: rt-4.0.6-31039-1428942024-686.142693-6-0@CULibrary

References: <RT-Ticket-142693@CULibrary>

rt-4.0.6-26706-1428941986-1323.142693-6-0@CULibrary

rt-4.0.6-31039-1428942024-686.142693-6-0@CULibrary

From: Dimi Chakalov <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Cc: A Rod Gover <[email protected]>,

Adam Helfer <[email protected]>,

Adam Riess <[email protected]>,

Adán Cabello <[email protected]>,

Akihiro Kanamori <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

Alan Rendall <[email protected]>,

Alessandro Teta <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Alex <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Andersson N A <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Andreas <[email protected]>,

Andrei Khrennikov <[email protected]>,

Andrew Wiles <[email protected]>,

Angelo Loinger <[email protected]>,

Angelo Tartaglia <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Anthony Lasenby <[email protected]>,

Anthony Leggett <[email protected]>,

Anthony Zee <[email protected]>,

Antoine Suarez <[email protected]>,

Anton <[email protected]>,

Arati Prabhakar <[email protected]>,

Ariel Goobar <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Baron Rees of Ludlow <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Ben Whale <[email protected]>,

Benni R <[email protected]>,

Bernadette Seevinck-Teulings <[email protected]>,

Bernard J Carr <[email protected]>,

Bernard Schutz <[email protected]>,

Bernd Brügmann <[email protected]>,

Bernd Schmidt <[email protected]>,

Bianca Dittrich <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

Bob Coecke <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Brendan <[email protected]>,

Brian Greene <[email protected]>,

Brian P Dolan <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Brukner Caslav <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Carl H Brans <[email protected]>,

Carlo Rovelli <[email protected]>,

Carlos Kozameh <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

Carsten Gundlach <[email protected]>,

Catherine Meusburger <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Robert Geroch <[email protected]>,

Cecilia Flori <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Charis Anastopoulos <[email protected]>,

Charles Torre <[email protected]>,

Chris Isham <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

Claus Gerhardt <[email protected]>,

Claus Kiefer <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

Craig Callender <[email protected]>,

Craig Copi <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Dadiv <[email protected]>,

Daniel Favrat <[email protected]>,

Daniel Sudarsky <[email protected]>,

Daniel L Stein <[email protected]>,

David B Malament <[email protected]>,

David Brown <[email protected]>,

David J Miller <[email protected]>,

David Krakauer <[email protected]>,

David Spergel <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Deepto Chakrabarty <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Demetris <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Dieter R Brill <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Domenico Giulini <[email protected]>,

Dominik Schwarz <[email protected]>,

Don N Page <[email protected]>,

"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,

Dorje Brody <[email protected]>,

Ed Witten <[email protected]>,

Edmund Robertson <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Eric Gourgoulhon <[email protected]>,

Erik Curiel <[email protected]>,

Etera Livine <[email protected]>,

Ettore Minguzzi <[email protected]>,

Evangelos Melas <[email protected]>,

Ezra Newman <[email protected]>,

Delalondre Fabien Jonathan <[email protected]>,

Fabiola Gianotti <[email protected]>,

Federico Piazza <[email protected]>,

Felix Schuermann <[email protected]>,

Fermilab Talks <[email protected]>,

Fernando Quevedo <[email protected]>,

Fotini Markopoulou <[email protected]>,

Frank Tipler <[email protected]>,

frankwilczek <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

Gary Horowitz <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

George <[email protected]>,

George Efstathiou <[email protected]>,

George F Smoot III <[email protected]>,

George Svetlichny <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Georgi Dvali <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Gian Michele Graf <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

Giovanni Amelino-Camelia <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Giuseppe Vitiello <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Graham Nerlich <[email protected]>,

Greg Galloway <[email protected]>,

Gregory Moore <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Günter Scharf <[email protected]>,

Günther Hasinger <[email protected]>,

H Kitada <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Hans Ohanian <[email protected]>,

Hans Peter Nilles <[email protected]>,

Hans Ringström <[email protected]>,

Helmut Friedrich <[email protected]>,

arXiv Help <[email protected]>,

Helvi Witek <[email protected]>,

Henry Markram <[email protected]>,

Hernan Gonzalez <[email protected]>,

Howard Georgi <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Huw Price <[email protected]>,

Hyun Seok Yang <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Ignatios Antoniadis <[email protected]>,

IGUS Jim <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

iqoqi vienna <[email protected]>,

J Anthony Tyson <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

Jack Lee <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

Jose Aguayo <[email protected]>,

James Cummings <[email protected]>,

James Gillies <[email protected]>,

James M Nester <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Jan-Åke Larsson <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Jeffrey Winicour <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Jennifer Ouellette <[email protected]>,

Jeremiah P Ostriker <[email protected]>,

Jeremy <[email protected]>,

Jim Isenberg <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

Joe Silk <[email protected]>,

John Baez <[email protected]>,

John Barrow <[email protected]>,

John Ellis <[email protected]>,

John Friedman <[email protected]>,

John Klauder <[email protected]>,

John L Bell <[email protected]>,

John M Lee <[email protected]>,

John Norton <[email protected]>,

John Stachel <[email protected]>,

John Stewart <[email protected]>,

John W Barrett <[email protected]>,

John Cusbert <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

Jonathan Halliwell <[email protected]>,

Jörg Frauendiener <[email protected]>,

Jorge Pullin <[email protected]>,

Jose Geraldo Pereira <[email protected]>,

Joseph Katz <[email protected]>,

Josh Goldberg <[email protected]>,


Julian Barbour <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Karel Hrbacek <[email protected]>,

Karel V Kuchar <[email protected]>,

Kavita Rajanna <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Khodr Shamseddine <[email protected]>,

Kristie Lyn Miller <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

Larry Ford <[email protected]>,

Larry Horwitz <[email protected]>,

Lars Andersson <[email protected]>,

Lars Bergström <[email protected]>,

Laszlo Szabados <[email protected]>,

Lau Loi So <[email protected]>,

Lawrence M Krauss <[email protected]>,

Lee Smolin <[email protected]>,

Lev Vaidman <[email protected]>,

Louis Witten <[email protected]>,

Luc Blanchet <[email protected]>,

Luca Bombelli <[email protected]>,

Luciano Rezzolla <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Magdalena Zych <[email protected]>,

Manfred Requardt <[email protected]>,

Marc Kamionkowski <[email protected]>,

Marco Spaans <[email protected]>,

Mario Livio <[email protected]>,

Martin Barstow <[email protected]>,

Martin Berz <[email protected]>,

Martin Bureau <[email protected]>,

Martin Raussen <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

Matt Visser <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

Meinulf Goeckeler <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Michael Spivak <[email protected]>,

Michael Strauss <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Mike <[email protected]>,

Mike Edmunds <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Muhammad Sharif <[email protected]>,

Mu-Tao Wang <[email protected]>,

Naoya Kitajima <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Neil Turok <[email protected]>,

Niall Ó Murchadha <[email protected]>,

Nomura Yasunori <[email protected]>,

Norbert Straumann <[email protected]>,

Ntina Savvidou <[email protected]>,

Nina Fedoroff <[email protected]>,

Oliver Jennrich <[email protected]>,

Otfried Guehne <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Paddy <[email protected]>,

Pankaj S Joshi <[email protected]>,

Partha Ghose <[email protected]>,

Paul Busch <[email protected]>,

Paul Davies <[email protected]>,

Paul G Allen <[email protected]>,

Paul Steinhardt <[email protected]>,

Paul Tod <[email protected]>,

Perez <[email protected]>,

Peter Jenni <[email protected]>,

Peter Milonni <[email protected]>,

Peter Riggs <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Piotr T Chrusciel <[email protected]>,

PoNing Chen <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

Raymond Goldstein <[email protected]>,

Rafael Sorkin <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Ravindra Saraykar <[email protected]>,

Raymond Chiao Y <[email protected]>,

Razieh Pourhasan <[email protected]>,

Renato Renner <[email protected]>,

Renyue Cen <[email protected]>,

Richard M Schoen <[email protected]>,

Richard Price <[email protected]>,

Robert Beig <[email protected]>,

Robert Brandenberger <[email protected]>,

Robert E Wyatt <[email protected]>,

Robert M Wald <[email protected]>,

Robert P Crease <[email protected]>,

Robert P Kirshner <[email protected]>,

Rod Sutherland <[email protected]>,

Roger Blandford <[email protected]>,

Roger Colbeck <[email protected]>,

Roger Penrose <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Rogier Brussee <[email protected]>,

Ronald J Adler <[email protected]>,

Roy Maartens <[email protected]>,

Rupert Sheldrake <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

Sascha Husa <[email protected]>,

Saul Perlmutter <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Scott Aaronson <[email protected]>,

Sean Carroll <[email protected]>,

Sean Hayward <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Sebastian <[email protected]>,

Sergiu Klainerman <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Shing-Tung Yau <[email protected]>,

Simon White <[email protected]>,

Slava <[email protected]>,

Sorin Paraoanu <[email protected]>,

Stanislav Babak <[email protected]>,

Stanley Deser <[email protected]>,

Stefan Wolf <[email protected]>,


Stephen Barnett <[email protected]>,

Steve Adler <[email protected]>,

Steven <[email protected]>,

Steven Carlip <[email protected]>,

Steven Giddings <[email protected]>,

Susanne Reffert <[email protected]>,

Sy David Friedman <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

Tejinder Singh <[email protected]>,

Thomas Filk <[email protected]>,

Thomas SCHUCKER <[email protected]>,

Thomas Thiemann <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Tim Maudlin <[email protected]>,

Tim-Torben Paetz <[email protected]>,

Todd Eisworth <[email protected]>,

Tomás Jech <[email protected]>,

Tomoi Koide <[email protected]>,

Torsten Asselmeyer-Maluga <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

Wilhelmus A J Luxemburg <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Xiao Zhang <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Yakir Aharonov <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected]

On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:20:24 -0400,

Message-ID: <rt-4.0.6-31039-1428942024-686.142693-6-0@CULibrary>,

arXiv Moderation <[email protected]> wrote:

>

> Your submission has been removed upon a notice from our moderators, who

> determined it inappropriate for arXiv.

[snip]

> Our moderators are not referees and provide no comments with their decisions.

arXiv Moderation:

You executed communist censorship against my paper 'Relative Scale Spacetime'.

Here are the facts.

Fact #1: Your anonymous moderators "provide no comments with their

decisions". Ten years ago, in July 2005, when Matt Visser and Don

Marolf were moderators at arXiv.org, they deleted my paper 'Are

Gravitational Waves Directly Observable?' (physics/0507133, Sun, 17

Jul 2005 18:59:24 GMT, 196kb) without any explanation either.

This is communist censorship.

Fact #2: You kept my paper, entitled Relative Scale Spacetime, "on

hold" for five months, since November 13, 2014. On Thu, 13 Nov 2014

10:10:17 -0500, I was informed by arXiv Help <[email protected]> that my

paper "is currently on hold pending a decision on classification. The

"hold" status merely indicates that one or more of the moderators need

additional time to consider your article."

Fact #3: Today you "determined it inappropriate for arXiv", but cannot

show any argument whatsoever against the new interpretation of the

origin of gravity, suggested in 'Relative Scale Spacetime'.

Fact #4: You are not aware of the basic facts of the current, and

essentially incomplete, formulation of General Relativity [Ref. 1].

All mathematical facts were known by 1922:

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/horizon.pdf


Fact #5: You don't even dare to show your names.

Shame on you, "moderators". You are total disgrace for Cornell University.

D. Chakalov

----

[Ref. 1] Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, ed. by Paul A. Schilpp,

Tudor Publishing Company, New York, 1951, p. 75.

"The right side is a formal condensation of all things whose

comprehension in the sense of a field-theory is still problematic. Not

for a moment, of course, did I doubt that this formulation was merely

a makeshift in order to give the general principle of relativity a

preliminary closed expression. For it was essentially not anything

more than a theory of the gravitational field, which was somewhat

artificially isolated from a total field of as yet unknown structure."

People are not interested in quantum-gravitational potential reality: see the water droplets

in Wilson cloud chamber on p. 8 in horizon.pdf. People like “Yif magic”: a black metal ring is

“translocated” inside a glass cup. Wow. How amazing. Thrilling. Exhilarating. Want more?

More on the “translocation” (quantum tunneling) on pp. 7-8 in HBP.pdf.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-R_UjP9vzw

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Translocation.mp4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6gd3-ZYMoM



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling#The_tunnelling_problem

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/HBP.pdf

D. Chakalov

April 17, 2015

Last updated: April 22, 2015, 14:43 GMT

Subject: Re: No "dark energy": We need new math


Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:01:41 +0000

Message-ID:

CAM7Ekx=-iWu7N76yST3S_tY4abqt10fi9QJTOQ8m57Kjxb=wBQ@mail.gmail.com

In Response To: [email protected]

To: Brian D. Nord <[email protected]>

Cc: J Anthony Tyson <[email protected]>,

Mike <[email protected]>,

A Rod Gover <[email protected]>,

http://imgsrc.hubblesite.org/hu/db/images/hs-2001-09-g-full_jpg.jpg



Adán Cabello <[email protected]>,








































Frank <[email protected]>,














Hugh <[email protected]>,



[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],



























Lars Bergström <[email protected]>,














Michael Eichmair <[email protected]>,






















[email protected],












[email protected],



Wei-Tou Ni <[email protected]>,


[email protected]

Brian:

> We appreciate your interest in our work and the big question

> of dark energy.

My solution to the so-called "dark" manifestations of gravity is

alternative to all your efforts to understand the issue, ever since

1930s.

> Keep thinking and exploring the concepts!

Werner Heisenberg and Erwin Schrödinger have indicated the only

possible path toward the solution; all you need is to show some

interest in it.

Some prerequisites can be read at


Sincerely,

D. Chakalov

> On Jan 23, 2014, at 2:16 PM, Dimi Chakalov <[email protected]> wrote:

[snip]

See my note from January 16, 2015, 14:00 GMT, on p. 75 in

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/comments.pdf

Given the lack of any interest in the origin of quantum-gravitational potential reality, I have

decided to follow 'the two rules for success':

There are two, and only two, rules for success.

Rule #1: Never tell them everything you know.



D. Chakalov

April 14, 2015, 20:08 GMT

Subject: Malcolm A H MacCallum, arXiv:1504.03606v1, p. 34

Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:45:42 +0000

Message-ID:

CAM7Ekxn2Mnn73_qpCReuBHFAp=2BgUJfq9SrMeEHyYTYMDALHg@mail.gmail.com


To: Malcolm MacCallum <[email protected]>

Cc: [email protected],

Thomas Buchert <[email protected]>,

Ruth <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Michal Heller <[email protected]>,

Jan Kowalski <[email protected]>,

Olivier Blanchard <[email protected]>,


Hermann Nicolai <[email protected]>,

Norbert Straumann <[email protected]>,


Michael J Longo <[email protected]>,

Craig J Copi <[email protected]>,

Glenn D Starkman <[email protected]>,


Dragan Huterer <[email protected]>,

Amos Altshuler <[email protected]>,


Mark Burgin <[email protected]>,



Mario Novello <[email protected]>,

Alain Blanchard <[email protected]>,

Elemér Rosinger <[email protected]>,

Bahram Mashhoon <[email protected]>,

Thomas Metzinger <[email protected]>,

Philip Pearle <[email protected]>,

Hans Primas <[email protected]>,

Atamalek Ghorbanzadeh <[email protected]>,

Wolf Singer <[email protected]>,

Horst Stöcker <[email protected]>,

Karlheinz Langanke <[email protected]>,

Shan Yu <[email protected]>,

Kip <[email protected]>,

http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.03606

Sanjeev Dhurandhar <[email protected]>,


Karsten <[email protected]>,

David <[email protected]>,

Valerio <[email protected]>,

Stephen Merkowitz <[email protected]>,

Meredith Gibb <[email protected]>,

Karen Smale <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

Blacks in Government NASA Goddard <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Simon Barke <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

Matthew Pitkin <[email protected]>,

Stuart Reid <[email protected]>,

James Hough <[email protected]>,

[email protected],

Stefan Krückeberg <[email protected]>,

Cliff <[email protected]>,

Michael Rowan-Robinson <[email protected]>,

[email protected]

Malcolm dorogoi,

You are definitely Russian. See what you wrote (p. 34): "In the near future, the ground-

based laser interferometric detectors, with their recently improved sensitivity, will give

interesting results whether they make a detection or not. (Since the predicted emission of

expected sources should be detectable, not seeing anything would cause a reevaluation of

our theoretical understanding.)"

The reevaluation of your theoretical understanding should have begun in 1922:


You also wrote (ibid.): "There is still hope that the space-based interferometric detector

LISA will fly within some of the readers' lifetimes."

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/russian.html


When pigs fly.

D.C.

Subject: Re: NSF OIG has received your submission. Thank you.

Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:01:34 +0000


Message-ID:

CAM7EkxkjR9yP-SxWHjCujmMgFfLY9mECfxzYkzARwh=Kgf7UbQ@mail.gmail.com

To: OIG <[email protected]>,

Counsel to the Inspector General <[email protected]>,

A Rod Gover <[email protected]>,



Adan Cabello <[email protected]>,


[email protected],




[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],


Bernard Schutz <[email protected]>,

Bernd Brügmann <[email protected]>,


Beverly Berger <[email protected]>,


[email protected],




Bruce Goldstein <[email protected]>,









[email protected],



Clifford Will <[email protected]>,







[email protected],





Drew Keppel <[email protected]>,









Francesco Salemi <[email protected]>,

Frank <[email protected]>,

Gabriela Gonzalez <[email protected]>,






Gilberto <[email protected]>,



Hamish Johnston <[email protected]>,




Hans-Jürgen Schmidt <[email protected]>,

[email protected],



Hermann Nicolai <[email protected]>,


Hugh <[email protected]>,



[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected],


[email protected],



James Ira Thorpe <[email protected]>,


Jay Armas <[email protected]>,


Jeremiah P Ostriker <[email protected]>,

Jirí Bicák <[email protected]>,

Joan Centrella <[email protected]>,













[email protected],







juerg gasser <[email protected]>,


Karsten Danzmann <[email protected]>,

Kip Thorne <[email protected]>,








Heinrich Leutwyler <[email protected]>,








Marek Abramowicz <[email protected]>,


Mark Hannam <[email protected]>,


Michael Eichmair <[email protected]>,



Brian D Nord <[email protected]>,



[email protected],






Pedro Marronetti <[email protected]>,



Petr Hajicek <[email protected]>,


[email protected],







[email protected],

Roger Blandford <[email protected]>,





juerg schacher <[email protected]>,

[email protected],








[email protected],



Sean McWilliams <[email protected]>,


Thomas A Prince <[email protected]>,


[email protected],



Warren Johnson <[email protected]>,

Wei-Tou Ni <[email protected]>,

Uwe-Jens Wiese <[email protected]>,


[email protected]

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Regarding the so-called "gravitational-wave astronomy", check out the facts on p. 9 in


(April 17, 2015, 11:52 GMT)

LIGO is for the birds.

Three years ago, on 22 Apr 2012, NSF OIG received my objections (Ref. No. 6786, cf.

attached), but left you play with your fantasies.

We live under communist censorship:

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/censorship.pdf

Feel free to pass this email to anyone who believes in the opposite.

Sincerely,

D. Chakalov

On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:55:15 -0400,

Message-ID:


http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/censorship.pdf

<[email protected]>,

OIG <[email protected]> wrote:

>

> Re: NSF OIG has received your submission. Thank you.

----

A KISS Note

S. Krasnikov reminded us (comments.pdf, p. 3) that “the Universe according to relativity is

a "motionless", "unchanging" 4-dimensional object, and gravity is just its shape. But what

can be called the speed of a shape?” To answer this question, keep in mind that

gravitational waves (GWs) “travel” within themselves and with respect to themselves. We

don‟t know the actual “speed of a shape”. We assume that it matches the “speed” of light,

and none of them can single out some preferred frame. So far so good, but here comes the

so-called GW “astronomy”, using the linearized approximation of GR (horizon.pdf, p. 9) and

postulating some thaumaturgic “reference to the "background" or undisturbed geometry,

which is there before the wave arrives and after it passes” (B. Schutz, p. 317). To detect

the work exerted on the “GW detectors”, made with the “speed of a shape” and by the

“shape” itself, let me suggest a simple (KISS) Gedankenexperiment on the timing of GW

detection along one of LIGO‟s arms AB, with proper distance AB = 4 km: the duration tAB of

the passing “shape” of spacetime from point A to point B is finite, and since you know the

distance, you will be able to calculate the “speed of a shape” in Minkowski spacetime (“a

shadow without power”, Hermann Weyl). Go ahead, it‟s just a KISS Gedankenexperimet.

Notice that we have instantaneous “shapes” in every snapshot „here-and-how‟ from the

movie reel in Fig. 3, with physically unobservable Lorentzian aether placed in the “dark

strips” ]between[ the instants „here-and-now‟: the transience of time is not physical phenomenon. Namely, the “dark strips” of physically unobservable Lorentzian aether

correspond to squared hyperimaginary unit w2 = 0, which is why the resulting physical continuum of events „here-and-now‟ (local mode of spacetime) is perfect. Nothing in GR

can be used to detect the fundamental flow of 4-D events (Heraclitus) with respect to the unobservable Lorentzian aether: “no “mechanism” exists in GR, which is capable of

producing GW‟s. In other terms, if we displace a mass, its gravitational field and the related curvature of the interested manifold displace themselves along with the mass” (A. Loinger).


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_frame


http://www.directtextbook.com/isbn/9780521455060

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_length#Proper_distance_between_two_events_in_flat_space

http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2371768

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Plato.jpg

http://vixra.org/abs/1410.0194

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_frame#Preferred_frame_in_aether_theory


http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Derendiger_23.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heraclitus#Panta_rhei.2C_.22everything_flows.22


http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0506024v2

D. Chakalov

April 20, 2015

Latest update: April 30, 2015, 10:05 GMT

Subject: Re: NSF OIG has received your submission. Thank you.

In-Reply-To: [email protected]

References:

CAM7EkxkjR9yP-SxWHjCujmMgFfLY9mECfxzYkzARwh=Kgf7UbQ@mail.gmail.com

[email protected]

Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:53:38 +0300

Message-ID:

CAM7Ekx=Kq_5zd+0nGC6Ed2D1iAaPV_mVK2=XsrPqcvOLoCObqA@mail.gmail.com


To: Warren Johnson <[email protected]>

Cc: Counsel to the Inspector General <[email protected]>,

OIG <[email protected]>,

[snip]

Warren dorogoi,

You are totally Russian, too.

> I have read the crucial parts of Mr. Chakalov's fundamental complaint,

> which apparently is: the accepted theory of gravitational wave detection

> is completely wrong.

Yes, it is completely wrong:

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Jose.jpg

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Bondi_1990.jpg

> This is analogous to saying that the accepted theory of electromagnetic

> wave detection is completely wrong.

You are totally wrong: see above.

If you have read my fundamental complaint, why are you dead quiet about it?

See the facts on p. 9 in


http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/russian.html




Get real and stop wasting BILLIONS of dollars -- all taxpayers' money --

for your fantasies.


D. Chakalov

Explanatory Note

If the reader has basic knowledge in gravitational physics, there‟s nothing much to explain.

First, some history. Daniel Kennefick reminded us (p. 1) that in 1981 Kip Thorne had no

difficulty in "finding a taker for a wager that gravitational waves would be detected by the

end of the last century. The wager was made with the astronomer Jeremiah Ostriker, one of

the better-known critics of the large detectors then being proposed. Thorne was one of the

chief movers behind the largest of the new detector projects, the half-billion-dollar Laser

Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory, or LIGO. He lost the bet, of course." Ten

years ago, on Monday, 18 July 2005, the talibans at arXiv.org deleted my paper 'Are

Gravitational Waves Directly Observable?' (physics/0507133, Sun, 17 Jul 2005 18:59:24

GMT, 196kb) without any explanation (see above). Nine years ago (Wed, 01 Mar 2006

04:59:31 +0200), I suggested to Jorge Pullin to convert the dark, air-conditioned tunnels of

LIGO to wine cellars (it is important to keep the temperature at 13ºC - 15ºC). Surely the

linearized approximation of GR can be used to adjust the GPS system, but not to detect the

gravitational radiation online, as it “happens” in real time read by a clock. Why? Because

the phenomenon is fundamentally nonlinear (Hermann Bondi). It is a fact of Nature (J.G.

Pereira; N. Dadhich; M. Montesinos). Let me try to offer a very simple explanation, such

that every taliban can understand it.

Here is the idea of GW “astronomy”, straight from LIGO:

Details from Kip Thorne, Overview of Gravitational Wave Science, Caltech's Physics 237-

2002, Ph237Week1Slides.pdf. Notice his slide 5, in which we learn that “each polarization

has its own gravitational-wave field”, which must be safely separated by LIGO “scientific”

collaboration, or else the two gravitational-wave fields (B. Schutz, p. 312, Fig. 22.1) will

conflate and intermingle.

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/GW_dream.jpg


http://elmer.tapir.caltech.edu/ph237/week1/week1.html

http://archive.ncsa.illinois.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/LIGO.html#Catch

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0602119

http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html




http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Naresh_2010.jpg

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Montesinos.jpg



http://elmer.tapir.caltech.edu/ph237/week1/week1.html

http://elmer.tapir.caltech.edu/ph237/week1/Ph237Week1Slides.pdf

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/kip_slide_5.jpg


http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/schutz1.jpg

But since these details may be complicated to the talibans at arXiv.org, let me offer a

simple drawing based on the „before-after‟ explanation by Bernie Schutz above. I will use a

plastic bottle which is being “squeezed” by passing GWs, and invoke some magical

“reference to the "background" or undisturbed geometry, which is there before the wave

arrives and after it passes” (B. Schutz, p. 317; emphasis mine).

t1: No gravity waves t2: Gravity waves present t3: No gravity waves

Note: Following V. Faraoni (p. 4), “we consider a gravitational wave with a single

polarization traveling along the z-axis perpendicular to the interferometer‟s arms,

perfectly reflecting mirrors, and a single reflection of each laser beam.”

Contrary to Hermann Weyl (see above), LIGO “scientific” collaboration claims that GWs can

travel in Minkowski spacetime, which will act as a “background” – just as if they use a

thermometer to detect the fluctuations of the temperature, relative to the base states at t1

and t3. Only their GW “astronomy” cannot in principle handle “a GW of arbitrary amplitude”

(M. Maggiore, p. 32), so they “derived” the ultra-weak limit from strong GWs with pure

magic, enhanced with wishful thinking and total ignorance of gravitational physics.

NB: The linearized approximation of GR kills the very effect they wish to measure, from the

outset. It would be as if they wish to measure the quantum "waviness" of a trajectory of a

Frisbee, but since the effect will be terribly small, they decide to apply classical physics.

Replace „classical physics‟ with „linearized approximation of GR‟ and you will understand the

mythical “stress-energy tensor for gravitational waves” in MTW, p. 970, Eq. 35.71; see also

A. Buonanno, p. 17, Eq. 4.1 and M. Maggiore, p. 34, Eq. 1.130.

For the record: Twelve years ago, on Thursday, 20 February 2003, I asked Hans-Jürgen

Schmidt a very simple question (Thu, 20 Feb 2003 12:05:02 +0200):

“Isn't it true that the necessary condition for detecting gravitational waves is that the

distribution of energy-momentum of a physical system in the gravitational field must be

uniquely defined on a continual trajectory, not just in one instant of measurement?”

Of course, Hans-Jürgen Schmidt never replied. Point is, if the Advanced LIGO and Advanced

Virgo detect gravitational waves (C. Van Den Broeck, p. 6), they will prove that the

gravitational energy can indeed be “uniquely defined on a continual trajectory, not just in

one instant of measurement” (MTW, p. 467), and pigs will fly.



http://elmer.caltech.edu/ph237/week4/week4.html


http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Maggiore_p32.jpg

https://plus.maths.org/content/schrodingers-equation-what-does-it-mean


http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/MTW_p_970.jpg

http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.4682v1

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Buonanno.jpg


http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Maggiore_p34.jpg

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9404037v1

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9404037v1

http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04621v1


http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/MTW_page_467.jpg

Ever since Kip Thorne failed to detect the transport of energy by GWs “by the end of the last

century” (see D. Kennefick above), LIGO “scientific” collaboration does one and the same

thing: asks for more money – taxpayers‟ money – to pay for ever-increasing “sensitivity” of

their GW “detectors”, up to the horribly expensive Advanced LIGO. B. Schutz openly stated

(p. 4; emphasis mine) that “by 2020 at least 3-4 billion dollars will have been invested

by a dozen national and international scientific organizations in building gravitational wave

detectors on the ground and in space”. Yet they still have no theory. Only a long chain of

total failures, starting from Kip Thorne.

Here Robert Wald (p. 120; emphasis mine) comes to rescue his bewildered colleagues:

So let‟s assume that the plastic bottle above is being altered by passing GW with

dimensionless amplitude “2.3x10-26” (arXiv:0909.3583v4): how will the “shape” of

spacetime (see S. Krasnikov above) produce work to induce stresses in the plastic bottle?

At what length scale would LIGO “scientific” collaboration postulate the “coupling”?

Anyway. The correct theory of gravitational radiation was developed by Sir Hermann Bondi

in 1961, and published one year later; see his Paper VII. It was intentionally neglected by

all people obsessed with “gravitational-wave astronomy”. They decided to cheat and

suggested some kind of “mixed procedure” (Jose Pereira; see also MTW, p. 968). They

aren‟t stupid and can read English: see Ruben Aldrovandi et al., arXiv:0809.2911, p. 13.

They simply love money.

As Johann Makowsky put it (The Jerusalem Post, 19 April 1985), “Overfunded research is

like heroin: It makes one addicted, weakens the mind and furthers prostitution.”

D. Chakalov

April 19, 2015

Last update: May 20, 2015, 15:10 GMT


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LIGO#Future









http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/MTW_p_968.jpg


subject: re: [moderation #142693] arxiv: submit/1106261 ...subject: re: [moderation #142693] arxiv:...

Documents