successes stories (and challenges) in tobacco control from...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Successes stories (and challenges) in tobacco
control from Thailand
Prof.Dr. Prakit Vathesatogkit, MD. FRCP
Advisor International Network for Health
Promotion Foundation
19 – 21 August ,2014
Bengaluru, India
Thailand’s Tobacco Control: Key Events (Before FCTC)
� 1989: Total Ban on Tobacco Advertising
� 1992: Tobacco Product Control Act
: Nonsmoker’s Health Protection Acts
� 1993: Implementation of Tax for Health Policy
(regular tax increase)
� 2001: Health Promotion Fund to fund tobacco
control and health promotion
2
3
The Tobacco Product Control Act 1992
� Ban sale to minors and by vending machines
� Total ban of advertising, promotion and
sponsorship
� Ban of free sample cigarettes
� Ban of small packets of cigarettes
� Health warning provision
� Ingredient disclosure
4
Smoke Free areas (1992-2004)
� Health Facilities
� Education facilities
� Religious places
� Air-conditioned restaurants
� Private office buildings
� Internet shops
� All Public transport
� Public parks
� Airports
� Sport arenas
� Government buildings
Certain designated smoking areas
5
Excise tax, cigarette sales and tax revenue
Year Tax Sales Tax revenue(%) (million Pack) (million of Baht)
� 1989 35-55 1,843 14,664 Start tobacco control
� 1990 55 1,941 15,461� 1991 55 1,942 15,898� 1992 55 1,983 15,438� 1993 55 2,135 15,345 � 1994 60 2,328 20,002 start tax for health policy
� 1995 62 2,171 20,736� 1996 68 2,463 24,092� 1997 68 2,415 29,755� 1999 70 1,810 26,708� 2000 71.5 1,826 28,110� 2001 75 1,727 29,627 Start health promotion fund
� 2002 75 1,716 31,247 Start UHI
� 2003 75 1,904 33,582� 2004 75 2,110 36,326
Source: the Excise Department, Ministry of Finance .Thailand
ASH THAILAND
6
1992 1997
25%
33%
The Quest for
a
sustainable funding for tobacco control & health promotion
7
• Two tobacco control law• Tobacco tax for health policy
Have in placed :
• Need funding to implement tobacco control program
Reasons for Thailand to set up a health promotion fund in the late 90’s
1. Unable to secure adequate budget for tobacco control purposes (for education, campaign, research, law enforcement) through regular channel.
2. There are other emerging non
communicable diseases facing
the same problem as with tobacco
control: no funding
8
Health financing reform policy (1996)MoF and MoPH
Appointed 2 Working Groups to Study:
1. Universal Health Insurance Coverage,
- to provide health security
2. Setting up Health Promotion Fund
- to prevent diseases/decrease health care cost.
This was advocated as a package
99
Result:
Two Complementary Acts Enacted10
Health Promotion Foundation Act 200111
� establishing Thaihealth Promotion Fund
administer by an autonomous state agency,
� Requiring extra 2% of alcohol and tobacco
surcharged taxes to this fund
� The funding is used for tobacco and alcohol
control programs as well as other health
promotion activities
12
12
2002 = 50 million USD
2013 = 130 million USD
13
Impact of Tobacco control measures in Thailand (1989-2004)
1993
1992- Tobacco Product
control Act- Smoke-free law
2011
Tax = 55% tax revenue 15,898
million baht
Sale = 1,941 million pack
Tax = 70%
tax revenue 57,196 million
baht
Sale = 2,038 million pack
2003 ThaiHealth funding
2005- Graphic warning- Ban POS display- Ban CSR publicity
Population > 15 year = 38.3 million Population > 15 year = 53.9 million
Male = 59.3%Female = 4.9%
Male = 40.7%Female = 2.1%
No of smokers = million
%
%
%
% % %
Krongtip = 12 baht Krongtip = 58 baht
2005FCTC
Ratification
Ban smoking in all public places
Smoking prevalence
Smoking prevalence
1991: Tobacco Control
Office
2003- Mass media campaign- Ban smoking in restaurant
1991 1996 2001 2004 2007 2009 2011
Annual
death from
tobacco
50,710
6 tax increases
In 15 years
- Smoking
prevalence
decease
- No Smoker
= 0.9 million
Tax revenue 36,326
million baht
Sale = 2,110 million pack
Thailand’s early successes
� Push for policies & legislation, mainly through media advocacy & lobbying
� Work with limited budget (less than 300,000 USD annual)
� Lay down the “Best buy” intervention framework (tax increase / ad ban / smoke-free law & warning of danger)
� Established sustainable funding for tobacco control
14
15
Thaihealth’s funding led to many more players in tobacco control.
� Ministry of Health - policy development
� NGO - ASH , THPI - advocacy ,lobbying
- public awareness campaign
� Tobacco control Research center. Mahidol U.
� Health Professional Network
- smoke free health facility
- smoking cessation
� Teacher network - smoke free school
- smoking edu program
� National quitline
� Mass media campaign
� Community group
� Thai Health Promotion Foundation - funding to all party
On advertising / promotion / sponsorship : Thailand has ban
1. All form of advertising promotion and sponsorship including point of sale display of cigarette packet
2. Advertisement of CSR activities on TV and radio
3. Depiction of smoking on TV
4. Internet sale (administrative)
5. Implement movie rating system
16
Remaining FCTC(13) GAPs
1. Ban “CSR” publicity in print and other medias.
2. Ban CSR activities.
3. Cross border advertising
4. Legislation to ban internet sale,
5. Plain packaging legislation
6. Enforcement problems
17
18
1974
2004
1990
1992 19972009
50%
55%
On warning of danger :
19
-Toxic Chemical:
Carbon monoxide
Cyanide
-Cancer Causing
agents:
Formaldehyde
Tar
Nitrosamine
Labeling of toxic substances and cancer causing agent on side of packet 2007/2011
10 Rotating messages
MOH’s new regulation published in the Royal Gazette April 5, 2013
� Requiring 85% GHW on both principle
surfaces of cigarette packs
� Each carton must contain cigarette pack
with 10 different GHW
� Effective date October 2, 2013 (6 months)
20
Effective October 2, 2013
Thailand’s MOH new regulation
ASH Thailand21
BRANDBRAND BRANDBRAND BRANDBRANDBRANDBRAND BRANDBRAND
BRANDBRAND BRANDBRAND BRANDBRAND BRANDBRAND BRANDBRAND
BRANDBRAND
Each carton must contain cigarette pack with
10 different GHWASH Thailand
22
Tobacco industries filed lawsuit
against MOH
� JTI filed suit : June 20, 2013
� PMI filed suit: June 26,2013
� TTTA and two smokers filed suit: July 5, 2013
� BAT filed suit: August 1, 2013
Request for1. Court injunction (stay order)
2. Rule that the law is illegal
23
Request Court to rule that the regulation is unlawful
1. The reg. is unconstitutional/unlawful
2. It violate the Trademark Act
3. It violate TRIPS Agreement
4. It is disproportionate
5. It create excessive burden
6. Technically impossible (10 pictures
per carton)
24
� The Central Administrative Court
issued “stay order” August 2013
� MOH appeal to high court
� The High Administrative court lifted
the “stay order” June 2014
� MOH will enforce the regulation September 23,2014
25
26
REPUBLIC OF KOREAREPUBLIC OF KOREACHINACHINA
Effective September 23, 2014
ThailandThailand
27
Regulation No 19 MOPH. June 28, 2010
Ban smoking
� Health Facilities
� Education facilities
� Religious places
� restaurants
� Private office buildings
� Government buildings
� Zoo
� Hotel lobby
� Internet shop
� All Public transport
� Public park
� All sport arena
� Night club and bar Non air con restaurants
� Open-air Market places
International Airport : only place with “Smoking room”
28
1992-1997
Cigarette smoke is harmful to people
close to you
2005-2012
Cigarette smoke kill near-by people
1989 - 1992
Respect the right of other by not smoking
in public places
Generating public support / compliance on smoke free law
Lady : “You don’t know me,
but why you are hurting me? (with your cigarette smoke)
Anti-Smoking TV Spot : Smoke free park
30
83.9 %
21.2 %
43.8 %
88.9 %
Exposure to second-hand smoke Comparison of the key finding (%)
2009 2011
Indoor workplaces 27.2 30.5
Healthcare facilities 4.8 7.3
Public transportation 21.6 25.6
Gov. Building 13.6 14.7
31
GATS Thailand 2011
Relying on self enforcing is not enough
Excise tax(%), cigarette sales, excise tax revenue
Year Excise Sales Excise Tax revenueTax (%) (million Pack) (million of Baht)
� 1993 55 2,135 15,345
� 1994 60 2,328 20,002
� 1997 68 2,415 29,755
� 1998 70 1,951 28,691
� 2004 75 2,110 36,326
� 2006 79 1,793 35,646
� 2007 80 1,958 41,528
� 2011 85 2,038 57,196
� 2013 87 2,172 67,863
Total tax burden to retail price = 70%
Cigarette sale volume/ Excise tax revenue
Mill
ion
Bah
t
Million BahtMillion Pack
Mill
ion
Pac
k
1992 2002 2012
33
Construction cost of MRT (Subway)
= 120,000 million Baht
Additional revenue gained from tobacco tax = 261,824 million baht (1994 – 2006)
Construction cost of sky train = 50,000 million Baht
34
Combine = 170,000 million baht
35
Rooms for improvement
1. tobacco tax structure
2. harmonization of taxes on
different tobacco products
3. indexation to inflation
4. strengthen tax administration5. strengthen illicit trade control
Impact of Tobacco control measures in Thailand (1991-2011)
1993
1992- Tobacco Product
control Act- Smoke-free law
2009
Tax = 55% tax revenue 15,898
million baht
Sale = 1,941 million pack
Tax = 85% tax revenue 57,196
million baht
Sale = 2,038 million pack
2003 ThaiHealth funding
2005- Graphic warning- Ban POS display- Ban CSR publicity
Population > 15 year = 38.3 million Population > 15 year = 53.9 million
Male = 59.3%Female = 4.9%
Male = 40.7%Female = 2.1%
If the rate of smoking in 2011 remain at 30% as in 1991,The number of smoker should be 17.2 million not 11.5 million. Thus the number of smoker in 2011 is 5.7 million less than it
should be.
No of smokers = million
%
%
%
% % %
Krongtip = 12 baht Krongtip = 58 baht
2005FCTC
Ratification
Ban smoking in all public places
Smoking prevalence
Smoking prevalence
1991: Tobacco Control
Office
2003- Mass media campaign- Ban smoking in restaurant
1991 1996 2001 2004 2007 2009 2011
Annual
death from
tobacco
42,000
Annual
death
from
tobacco
45,136
Annual
death from
tobacco
50,710
9 tax increases
37
Thaihealth funding for major NCDs risks reduction program
Issue based Million (USD)
2013 2014
Tobacco 8.0 11.8
Alcohol 10.7 9.3
Traffic accident 7.0 8.1
Physical activity 6.6 8.0
Diet/ Nutrition 5.0 6.8
Mass Media 7.8 7.0
Total 45.1 51.0
Assessed Plan
Investment
(million
$USD)
Outcomes
(million
$USD)
Social Return on
Investment
($ USD) Per $1
USD Investment
of ThaiHealth
1. Road Traffic Accidents
(2001-2010)48.5 6,312.0 130.2
2. Tobacco-Consumption
Control(2001-2010)47.8 876.3 18.3
38
Social Return on Investments of ThaiHealth
FCTC Article 26Financial resources (2004)
39
1. The Parties recognize the important role
that financial resources play in achieving the
objective of this Convention.
2. Each party shall provide financial support in
respect of its national activities intended to
achieve the objective of the Convention.
Obstacle for FCTC implementation Report from 126 Parties (2012)
1. Tobacco industry interference
2. Lack of political will
3. Insufficient level of financial support
for tobacco control
4. Lack of intersectoral coordination
40
Health Promotion Fund in WPRO country
Funding source
1. Vic Health Australia 1987 General budget
2. Health way Australia 1990 General budget
3. Singapore Health Promotion Board 2001 General budget
4. Mysihat (Malaysia) 2006 General budget
5. Tonga 2007 General budget
6. Mongolia 2007 Tobacco/alcohol tax
7. Republic of Korea 2011 General budget
8. Vietnam Tobacco Control Fund 2013 Tobacco tax
9. Laos Tobacco Control Fund 2013 Tobacco tax
41
WPRO started the “Prolead” project 2004
Health Promotion Fund in other region
Funding source
1. SwissHealth 1994 Health insurance
2. AustrianHealth 1998 %VAT
1. Thaihealth 2001 Tobacco/alcohol tax
2. Indonesia 2014 Tobacco tax
3. Nepal 2014 Tobacco tax
42
EURO
SEARO
SEARO is starting the “Prolead” project (2014)
43
Total tax rates levied by Parties on cigarettes by WHO region (% of average retail prices)
WHO region
Total tax rates levied by Parties on cigarettes (%)
Mean
African 55.5
Americas 57.9
South – East Asia 30.5
European 68.9
Eastern Mediterranean 49.8
Western Pacific 57.6
Global 59.4
FCTC Global Progress Report 2012
44
Mean average prices per pack of 20 cigarettes (US$) for different reporting periods, by WHO region.
WHO region
Mean average prices per pack of 20 cigarettes (US$)
2012
African 1.94
Americas 3.20
South – East Asia 0.79
European 5.87
Eastern Mediterranean 1.47
Western Pacific 5.54
Global 3.81
FCTC Global Progress Report 2012
45
A REPORT BY BILL GATES TO G20 LEADERS | Cannes Summit, November 2011
Mobilizing Domestic Resources
The World Health Organization (WHO)
recommends tobacco excise taxes of at least
70 percent of the pack price.
46
Failure to convince Gov to support Smoking Cessation:
Cessation therapy
• was given low priority, cessation
medication not cover by health insurance
• the most expensive and labour
intensive intervention in tobacco control
Thailand emphasis on changing the
environment (population base) rather than
dealing with individual smoker
Global NCD reduction targetsby 2025
1. 25% reduction in NCDs mortality
2. 30% reduction in smoking prevalence
3. 10% reduction in alcohol use
4. 30% reduction in salt intake
Tobacco control is most cost effective in reducing NCDs
48
Ischemic heart disease = 34,384
Stroke = 50,829
Cancer = 80,711
COPD = 18,660
DM = 26,380
Total major NCDs = 210,963
Total death = 415,900
Death from NCDs = 50.7%
Death from NCDs before 60 yrs. old = 27%
= 56,960
Not possible to fight NCDs without sustainable funding Thailand NCDs Death (2009)
What Thailand has gained from FCTC implementation
49
1. Stabilization of number of smokers (about 12 million)
2. Decrease smoking prevalence ( 59.3 40.7%)
3. Protection of million of Thai from second hand smoke
4. Government received huge amount of revenue from regular tax increase policy
5. Establishment of Thailand Health Promotion Fund to support NCDs control
6. Enhanced Universal Health Insurance coverage and quality of care.
50
Challenges1. Tax- High prevalence of hand roll cigarette (50%)
- excise tax structure – trading down effect
2. Smoke free law
- Weak enforcement
3. Marketing control
- Selling of single stick cigarette
- Violation of ad-ban
4. Tobacco industry interference
- Opposing government initiative
- CSR activities
5. Inadequate cessation support
6. Problem of new tobacco products
The way forward51
� Tobacco tax reform
� Include cessation services in UHI benefit.
� Strengthening of law enforcement
� Create tobacco control committee in provinces
� Incorporate FCTC provisions into related laws
� Increase tobacco control funding
� Ratification of Protocal to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products
52