summary of ia assessment criteria

2
SUMMARY OF IA ASSESSMENT PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT 0-2 This criterion assesses the extent to which the student engages with the exploration and makes it their own. Personal engagement may be recognized in different attributes and skills. These could include addressing personal interests or evidencing independent thinking, creativity or initiative in the designing, implementation or presentation of the investigation. EXPLORATION 0-6 This criterion assesses the extent to which the student establishes the scientific context for the work, states a clear and focused research question and uses concepts and techniques appropriate to Diploma level. Where appropriate, this criterion also assesses awareness of safety, environmental, and ethical considerations. The relevance of research can hardly be overestimated and references should be properly quoted in clear endorsement of IB ethical guidelines. ANALYSIS 0-6 This criterion assesses the extent to which the student's report provides evidence that the student has selected, recorded, processed and interpreted the data in ways that are relevant to the research question and can support a conclusion. This analysis should be carried at the expected IB level making use of critical thinking, and acquired knowledge and skills. EVALUATION 0-6 This criterion assesses the extent to which the student’s report includes evaluation of the investigation and the results with regard to the research question and the accepted scientific context. While errors, when relevant,

Upload: john-osborne

Post on 04-Sep-2015

8 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

A brief summary of the way in which practical work is assessed in the new curriculum

TRANSCRIPT

SUMMARY OF IA ASSESSMENT

PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT 0-2This criterion assesses the extent to which the student engages with the exploration and makes it their own. Personal engagement may be recognized in different attributes and skills. These could include addressing personal interests or evidencing independent thinking, creativity or initiative in the designing, implementation or presentation of the investigation.

EXPLORATION 0-6This criterion assesses the extent to which the student establishes the scientific context for the work, states a clear and focused research question and uses concepts and techniques appropriate to Diploma level. Where appropriate, this criterion also assesses awareness of safety, environmental, and ethical considerations. The relevance of research can hardly be overestimated and references should be properly quoted in clear endorsement of IB ethical guidelines.

ANALYSIS 0-6This criterion assesses the extent to which the student's report provides evidence that the student has selected, recorded, processed and interpreted the data in ways that are relevant to the research question and can support a conclusion. This analysis should be carried at the expected IB level making use of critical thinking, and acquired knowledge and skills.

EVALUATION 0-6This criterion assesses the extent to which the students report includes evaluation of the investigation and the results with regard to the research question and the accepted scientific context. While errors, when relevant, should be considered the evaluation has a more ambitious target which should involve chemical analysis.

COMMUNICATION 0-4This criterion assesses whether the investigation is presented and reported in a way that supports effective communication of the focus, process and outcomes.

TOTAL MARKS: 24