summary of noaa's 2010 hurricane field program (ifex)

16
mary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IF Robert Rogers – 2010 HFP Field Program Director 1

Upload: kent

Post on 18-Jan-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX) Robert Rogers – 2010 HFP Field Program Director. Intensity Forecasting Experiment (IFEX; Rogers et al., BAMS, 2006). IFEX intended to improve prediction of TC intensity change by: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

Robert Rogers – 2010 HFP Field Program Director

1

Page 2: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

Intensity Forecasting Experiment (IFEX; Rogers et al., BAMS, 2006)

IFEX intended to improve prediction of TC intensity change by: 1)collecting observations that span TC life cycle in a variety of environments for model initialization and evaluation2)developing and refining measurement technologies that provide improved real-time monitoring of TC intensity, structure, and environment3)improving understanding of physical processes important in intensity change for a TC at all stages of its life cycle

These goals provide the linkage between observations, modeling, and theory that form the foundation of the Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project (HFIP) 2

Page 3: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

Focus areas for 2010IFEX goal 1: Collecting observations for model initialization/evaluation

• Tail Doppler radar• Synoptic surveillance with Global Hawk• HWRFx/HFIP real-time runs

• Coyote low-level UAS• Doppler Wind Lidar• Ocean winds/AWRAP• Global Hawk high-level UAS

IFEX goal 2: Developing and refining measurement technologies

3

• Genesis• Rapid Intensity Change• TC-Ocean interaction• Saharan Air Layer• Landfall and Inland Decay• TC/AEW Arc Cloud• Hurricane PBL Entrainment Flux• Aerosol/Cloud Droplet measurement

IFEX goal 3: Improving understanding

Page 4: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

• Summary: NOAA aircraft flew ~420 h (28 P-3 and 19 G-IV

missions) in 9 tropical systems, and 3 Gulf ocean survey missions

Deployed ~1000 GPS dropsondes; ~200 ocean probes (AXBT/CP/CTD)

Performed 79 Doppler analyses & SO data sets Performed 125 H*Wind analyses Performed 380 HWRFx simulations in 11 storms

and 9 invests 17 HEDAS analyses & HWRFx runs for Hurricanes

Earl, Karl, and Tomas 2 coordinated P-3/Global Hawk missions – 1 each

in Earl & Karlo ONR DWL installation delayedo G-IV TDR acceptance tests delayed

• TD 2 & 5, TS Alex, Bonnie, Matthew, Richard, Hurricanes Earl, Karl and Tomas plus 3 Gulf pre-storm ocean survey missions (+10 ocean survey missions in support of DWH spill - unprecedented upper ocean data set over Gulf of Mexico for coupled modeling)

For details see: http://noaahrd.wordpress.com/category/ifex-discussion

Intensity Forecast experiment (IFEX 2010)

Courtesy wunderground.com

4

Focus will be on two “featured” datasets: Earl and Karl

Page 5: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

Geographic coverage of Earl P-3 flights

5

Page 6: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

P-3 missions

G-IV missions

P-3 and G-IV coverage during intensity evolution of Earl

6

Date/Time (dd/hhhh)

Page 7: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

0

21:44Z Aug 28

23:03Z Aug 28

09:39Z Aug 29

11:58Z Aug 29

21:00Z Aug 29

22:13Z Aug 29

00:44Z Aug 30

11:17Z Aug 30

13:40Z Aug 30

21:23Z Aug 30

22:31Z Aug 30

23:33Z Aug 30

Evolution of axisymmetric tangential wind (shaded, m/s) during RI phase of Earl

0123456789

1011121314

0123456789

1011121314

0123456789

1011121314

0123456789

1011121314

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200

20

25

30

35

40

45

20

25

30

35

40

45

20

25

30

35

40

45

20

25

30

35

40

45

radius (km) radius (km) radius (km) 7m/s

Page 8: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

Evolution of wind speed (shaded, m/s) from 1-9 km altitude during steady-state phase of Earl0114Z Sept 2 2343Z Sept 2

9 km 9 km

5 km 5 km

1 km 1 km

x

x

x x

x

x

8

Page 9: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

1

2

34

56 7

8

12

11

109

1

23 4

5

67

8

910

11

12

Hodographs of inner-core winds (m/s) from 0.5-12 km altitude for Earl

9

Page 10: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

Summary for Earl flights• historic dataset collected in Hurricane Earl• nearly complete lifecycle, sampled at 12-h intervals for inner core by P-3’s, 24-h intervals for environment by G-IV• significant RI episode sampled by Doppler radar prior to, during, and after• steady-state period as a major hurricane sampled, including vortex interaction with increasing upper-level SW shear• weakening stages sampled, including period leading up to ET

First thoughts on questions to address• how does vortex evolve during RI? Symmetric and asymmetric evolution? Kinematic and thermodynamic evolution?• what’s relative role of convective-, vortex-, and environmental-scale processes in RI?• how does mature hurricane respond to increasing vertical shear (tilt, wind field asymmetries)?• what is structural change during weakening and prior to ET?• and many more…..

10

Page 11: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

Geographic coverage of Karl P-3 and G-IV flights

11

Page 12: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

P-3 and G-IV coverage during intensity evolution of Hurricane Karl (2010)

P-3 missionsG-IV missions

12

Page 13: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

1 km

23:56Z Sept. 12

1 km

12:00Z Sept. 13

1 km

01:04Z Sept. 13

6 km

23:56Z Sept. 12

6 km

12:00Z Sept. 13

6 km

01:04Z Sept. 13

Doppler and dropsonde composites during pre-genesis stage of Karl

1 km 13

Page 14: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

Summary for Karl flights• good coverage during pre-genesis stage of Karl, in particular with dropsonde data and combined with other agencies’ aircraft (G-V, DC-8)• radar coverage limited during genesis stage • observations showed a disorganized circulation gradually becoming better organized during the 36 h system was sampled by P-3• significant RI episode sampled by Doppler radar after emerging from Yucatan, but only one flight

First thoughts on questions to address• how did the circulation of the incipient depression evolve during multiple days prior to designation as a T.D. (T.S.)? Was circulation maximized in midlevels first or at low levels?• what was thermodynamic environment within the slowly-developing core and environment? How did that change over time? • how can observations from P-3 be combined with observations from DC-8 and Global Hawk, both during genesis and RI stages, to provide depiction of vortex and environmental evolution?• how can this data best be used to initialize and evaluate numerical model performance?• and many more….. 14

Page 15: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

• NSF PREDICT (PRE-Depression Investigation of Cloud systems in the Tropics, 8/15-9/30)• G-V – based in St. Croix• Mike Montgomery, Chris Davis, Andy Heymsfield,

Lance Bosart leads• Excellent dropsonde coverage in pre-genesis stage

of Karl

Interactions with other experiments

15

• NASA GRIP (Genesis and Rapid Intensification Processes, 8/15-9/30)• DC-8 -- based in Ft. Lauderdale, GH -- based in

Dryden, CA• Scott Braun, Ed Zipser, Gerry Heymsfield aircraft

leads• GH flew missions over Hurricanes Earl and Karl,

good coverage of RI stage of Karl

Page 16: Summary of NOAA's 2010 Hurricane Field Program (IFEX)

2011 IFEX coming soon…

• Shirley Murillo - Hurricane Field Program Director

• Continue addressing IFEX/HFIP goals

• Sustain our partnerships with EMC and NESDIS

• Strengthen our interactions with NHC

• Encourage greater awareness in broader TC community

16