summary of peer evaluation forms

21
Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms Team Two, Three, Five, Seven, Eight

Upload: neva

Post on 08-Jan-2016

51 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms. Team Two, Three, Five, Seven, Eight. Evaluations for Team Two. Complete Requirements: 33 Pass Original Idea: 2 Fail / 32 Pass Presentation Quality: 5 Pass / 16 OK / 9 Good / 2 Excellent Overall Organization: 1 Fail / 8 Pass / 10 OK / 11 Good. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Team Two, Three, Five, Seven, Eight

Page 2: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Evaluations for Team Two

Complete Requirements: 33 Pass

Original Idea: 2 Fail / 32 Pass

Presentation Quality:

5 Pass / 16 OK / 9 Good / 2 Excellent

Overall Organization:

1 Fail / 8 Pass / 10 OK / 11 Good

Page 3: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Feedback for Team 27 Positive / 7 Negative

1. Angela/4: Stating clearly but not enough2. Eleven/8 : There is a little surprise3. Niusuya/8: I think it is a education website. They are professional.

It is a study website4. Jano/8: The original idea is good but too traditional

The presentation is not so good ,some pages should written in English5. Tock/5:They have not given what we study. They assignment is very clearly6. Grace/3: It is not in English They have done lots of things7. Davi/7: It is a good idea, but the safe is very good8. Erons/3: They have good idea and success.

It is very clear, they have done a lot of things9. Tony/5: in function. I see learning language and where is it in web, the homepage is good, but the second page is not so good .10. Changzhu/7: It is ordinary in the market. The content is dull.11. Chengguo/7 : It is good, let’s know what he said. Every one enjoy it12. Chenxu/4 The idea is good.

Page 4: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Evaluations for Team Three

Complete Requirements: 6 Fail / 26 PassOriginal Idea: 2 Fail / 30 Pass Presentation Quality: 11 Pass / 11 OK / 10 Good / 3 ExcellentOverall Organization: 1 Fail / 14 Pass / 7 OK / 11 Good / 2 Excellent

Page 5: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Team 3 Comments13 Positive / 6 Negative

1.No flash can be seen here.2.No flash Demo3.No story.4.The idea is good!5.I like the team’s idea!6.it’s good & we know what is love!7. Everyone likes their works8. It faces all people.9. It’s very good!10. I like it!11. It tells us lots of loves.12. What is your definition of love?13.No demo.14.Every pic is so beautiful.15. The content is good16. Pretty work.17.Clear and useful topic18. Beautiful interface.19. It’ll be better if they tell more about the users

Page 6: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Evaluations for Team Five

Complete Requirements: 35 Pass

Original Idea: 34 Pass

Presentation Quality:

1 Fail / 11 Pass / 2 OK / 25 Good / 5 Excellent

Overall Organization:

1 Fail / 12 Pass / 2 OK / 23 Good /

5 Excellent

Page 7: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Team 5 Comments16 Positive / 6 Negative

1. Maybe they should improve their main idea2. Interface Design should be able to include more information about the subject in the project3. They have changed their idea. But it’s also good.4. The topic is from the Internet5. It’s attractive to boys more than girls6. Good idea. Good at Flash7. It’s Cool8. Wonderful9. I don’t know what’s the software used for?10. Logo is cool!11. Useful12. New Idea13. The interface is very good!14. This can attract me.15. So Clear16. Cool17. Beautiful18. Like a Foreign Adventure19. It’s very beautiful20. Cool21. Too complex22. Professional

Page 8: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Evaluations for Team Seven

Complete Requirements: 1 Fail / 34 Pass

Original Idea: 34 Pass

Presentation Quality:

5 Fail / 5 Pass / 13 OK / 11 Good

Overall Organization:

5 Fail / 15 OK / 16 Good

Page 9: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Feedback for Team Seven9 Positive / 10 Negative

1. No Flash Demo- No language used in the flash was mentioned here (erons)2. Project Tells them some useful knowledge (erons)3. The story is good (grace)4. Not clear (tock)5. Background is dull 6. Lacks of demo (sun and ben)7. Speak fluently (rona)8. Cleary presentation (angela)9. Every stage is showed clearly (jano)10. Let everyone know what is it about (long)11. We finished it together (long)12. Show how Caocong is smart - elevate the elephant smartly (eric)13. It’s interesting (rona)14. Clearly (angela)15. Most pages are clearly (jano)16. Not clear! (tock)17. Topic’s too simple (erons)18. Why not telling us some truth about your story?19. It’s better if u change your story.

Page 10: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Evaluations for Team Eight

Complete Requirements: 3 Fail / 27 Pass

Original Idea: 1 Fail / 30 Pass

Presentation Quality:

1 Fail / 13 Pass / 5 OK / 7 Good / 5 Excellent

Overall Organization:

1 Fail / 16 Pass / 5 OK / 8 Good / 5 Excellent

Page 11: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Team 8 Comments14 Positive / 6 Negative

1.The expression is not very good.2. No interface, no illustration, just design.3. Nothing4. Key thing: Water5. The idea is very novel6. It is very clear, and we all know what they have done.7. Creative.8. Boring.9. Good idea, young boys will like it.10. If the Flash is completed I think it will be very good.11. We know and think about it.12. Only text it’s dull13. She express well.14. Great15. Looks nice.16. Will like this Flash17. They finish the work very good.18. The Demo is interesting. Good.19. It’s very beautiful.20. Creative

Page 12: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Messages from Team Leaders on feedback to make the software

project EXCELLENT:Team Two Leader: 1) Translate Documents to English (design, project plan, requirements); 2) Do detailed design in English; 3) Software Project is in English.Team Three Leader: 1) Add more story; 2) Add more interactivity and games 3) Complete Flash Demo - Soon! 4) Study programming in Flash.Team Five Leader: 1) We should Improve our Idea; 2) Consider better design for girls; 3) Add more content to improve our software design; 4) Add credits; Team Seven Leader: 1) Format Flash Demo; 2) List Sources and credits; Team Eight Leader: 1) Improve Presentation; 2) Make clearer what is the key object of the game? 3) Improve Flash programming;

Page 13: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

ALL TEAM INCLUDE YOUR PPT PRESENTATIONS ON WIKI

Team

Two, Three, Five, Seven, Eight

Great Job!

Page 14: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Evaluations for Team OneComplete Requirements: 38 PassOriginal Idea: 0 Fail / 39 Pass Presentation Quality: 2 Fail / 13 Pass / 8 OK / 10 Good / 6 ExcellentOverall Organization: 0 Fail / 16 Pass / 5 OK / 10 Good / 8 Excellent

Page 15: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Feedback for Team 117 Positive / 13 Negative

1. Richard/7: no videos , some scene don’t work. Speak too fast, need more practice. just so so.2. Eric/5:Should make flash running smoothly.3. Kimi/1: Well prepared lecture. And projects is new and good topic. Need to complete the work. Good

beginning and good ending.4. Chenxu/4: The music sounds well, too loud music .5. Zhangqianhan/4: mixed music is too loud. Great! The technology is good.6. Yangxue/4: The music sounds well, but too loud .7. Angela/4: The background of the flash is too simple. Lack the feeling of wonderful.8. Chengguo/7: The idea is talk about our life. The flash’s voice is not good, they finish the work.9. Ducka/7: The idea is talk about our life. The flash’s voice is not good, they finish the work.10.Erons/3: Good idea! Dear! Should improve!11.Rose/3: it’s attractive. The music is wonderful.12.Changezhu/7:Your idea is not applicable to software bushiness.13.Ben/2: Good idea. But the system is simple. The video (about the life) is incomplete.14.Zhangli/3: He is self-confident .15.Jano/8: It is clear! music is beautiful.16.Niu shu ya/8: It’s a very new idea! I like the background very much. I like the creature.17.Eleven/8: Interesting. Comfortable, but it’s not beautiful.18.Rona/8: The little fish is interesting.19. Igam/5: This flash makes me very happy.20.Jack/1: I think it will be very good.

Page 16: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Evaluations for Team FourComplete Requirements: 4 Fail / 34 PassOriginal Idea: 3 Fail / 35 Pass Presentation Quality: 3 Fail / 16 Pass / 10 OK / 9 Good / 2 ExcellentOverall Organization: 2 Fail / 16 Pass / 10 OK / 9 Good / 4 Excellent

Page 17: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Feedback for Team Four14 Negative / 9 Positive

What’s missing:1. Robert/2: I don’t know information about the nine planets2. Richard/7: Missing information about 9 planets3. Eric/5: We cannot see your content clearly4. Grace/3: The background is not beautiful.5. Grace/3: The idea is good. I don’t know Which people can learn it?6. Niusuya/8: I think maybe it’s only on the Shenzhou6. It needs more content about planets.

Originality:1. Ben/2: Good idea. But detail should be better.2. ChangeZhu/7: Introduce more knowledge is welcome, but the project is not considerable for business3. Rose/3: Interesting4. Erons/3: Useful Science5. Tony/5: The button is hard to click6. Kimi/1: Very interesting, original.7. Chengguo/7: I like this idea. I want to know more and more8. Eleven/8: There are more relations between Flash and PPT

Presentation:1. Eerons/3: Clear presentation. Think more about users.2. Richard/7: Topic missing. I am very confused.3. Zhangli/3: She expresses clearly.4. Sherky/4: Attractive to many people, need more contact with users.5. Kimi/1: Good lecture. Hope to see the future content and contact with the user.

Page 18: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Evaluations for Team SixComplete Requirements: 4 Fail / 31 PassOriginal Idea: 4 Fail / 29 Pass Presentation Quality: 3 Fail / 10 Pass / 6 OK / 10 Good / 8 ExcellentOverall Organization: 1 Fail / 12 Pass / 4 OK / 9 Good /8 Excellent

Page 19: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Feedback for Team Six18 Positive / 18 Negative

1. (Eron/3): Good and prepared.2. (roket/2): Not completed all the requirement.3. (Ben/2): The game is not finished.4. (He ZhiMing/2): No game yet.5. (Rona/8): The music is not very good.6. (chengguo/7): I like panda and like the idea.7. (Eron/3): It is interesting and useful for children .8. (chang zhu/7): Ok, it is a good idea.9. (tock/5): It is just a pass.10. (grace/3): The story is so small. Not all the words are in English.11. (Ben /2): The voice of Panda doesn’t work.12. (zhangli/3): It is a good idea.13. (jano/8): Every page is beautiful.14. (Eron/3): Very clear. She speak fluently.15. (jack/1): The pictures are good.16.(igam/5): The demo is very good.

Page 20: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Feedback for Team Six

1. (eleven/8): Tough,structure of the stage is not good. (??)2. (niu su ya/8): I think is better have a game. Music is not good enough.3. (zhangli/3): The content is various, but the sound is not good match.4. (jano/8): The game sounds interesting.5. (rona/8): It’s very useful.6. (chenggguo/7): We see the flash about panda. The flash is good.7. (angela/4): They have a clear topic and state wholely.8. (yangxue/4): That’s a good idea. It’s very significant, but the content

is not good enough.9. (chenxv/4): The characters (words) are so small.10. (kimi/1): The text should be in English. Lovely. Did not see the game.11. (eric/5): The game should be reconsidered. The graphic is wonderful.12. (richard/7): Just so so; Lack of interaction with users.13. (sun/7): It’s full of dull.14. (liu yi hua/3): Good idea. Very nice.15. The background in the front page isn’t good for it is vague.

Page 21: Summary of Peer Evaluation Forms

Messages from Team Leaders on feedback to make the software

project EXCELLENT:

Team One Leader: 1) We should do better job in the Flash to make it more beautiful; 2) We should complete video about the team’s life, and show it to everyone; 3) Make the programming of Flash not so simple; 4) Maybe add more games and content.

Team Four Leader: 1) We should add information and animation about the 9 planets; 2) Add more contact with the user, more interactivity; 3) Design better buttons on the main interface.

Team Six Leader: 1) Add more sound effects and better music and voices of the Panda; 2) Improve the Game; 3) Translate all the text into English; 4) More interaction for the user.