summer 15 special academic edition
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/24/2019 Summer 15 Special Academic Edition
1/6
A newsletter of events and
circumstances concerning
The Montauk Project
(continued on page 2)
MONTAUKPULSEA C H R O N I C L E O F T I M E
THE
DR. DAVID ANDERSONS TECHNOLOGY EXPLAINED
LIGHT CONES AND CLOSED TIMELIKE CURVES
Copyright 2015
by Peter Moon and Dr. David Anderson
The following article is intended for academic and edu-
cational use worldwide and may be broadly distributedas long as the authors are acknowledged and credited.
The purpose of this special edition of theMontauk Pulsenewsletter (see back page for explanation and context of
this publication) is to give a simplistic overview of the
mechanics of time control technology and to demonstrate
that the proposition of time travel does not violate the basic
laws of physics and mathematics; and further, that these
laws support the idea.
As this is written, time control technology has been
developed with varying degrees of success by different
governments on the planet, and it, along with censorship oftechnology in general, is a prime defensive and offensive
imperative with regard to the survival of nations. It is in
the interest of the general public to learn and understand
the undeniable plausibility and potential of this technology
in order to advocate full disclosure and minimize abuse of
this technology.
What is written here is based upon decades of research
and breakthroughs by Dr. David Anderson who has pat-
ented a time reactor that literally manipulates time itself.
In order to understand how time travel or move-
ment through space-time occurs, imagine yourself in ascience ction story (the holodeck in Star Trek: The Next
Generationbeing one example) where time has stopped
and everything is literally frozen in time. In this sce-
nario, however, is a character who is witnessing it but is
not similarly frozen. In other words, he can move around
and stick his tongue out at the various characters or do
whatever he wants to do. While it is self-evident that this
scenario can be referenced on a graph with various grid
lines and axes (used as the plural of axishere), it is too
unwieldy to render this three-dimensionally; so, for the
sake of simplicity, we will use a 2-D grid to explain how
time control works. Thexaxis above represents time and
theyaxis represents space.* In the frozen scenario above,
all people and objects are virtually still (or moving in-
nitely slow) in regards to space (theyaxis) and time (thex
axis). When time is unfrozen, everything moves along the
verticalxtime axis. As space-time are inextricably woven
together, there is a natural harmony between these two
expressions of experience. Each, however, is a different
aspect that can operate with different ratios of movement
to each other, just like slowing lm down for slow-motion. Dr. Andersons time reactor technology is based upon
either accelerating or decelerating time in a self-contained
eld by stimulating a chemical reagent (which I have
identied as a noble gas) within a eld of lasers contain-
ing extensive sensors and inducing a low-grade rotating
electromagnetic eld.** This self-contained eld is similar
to the electromagnetic bottle effect utilized in the Phila-
delphia Experiment, but it is being done by different and
safer means.
It is a principle of time control that when you either
accelerate or decelerate an object or person (with a time
reactor), this virtual bottle or bubble is no longer mov-
ing in synchronization with reference to the vertical time
line depicted above. For graphing purposes, the bubble
can be referred to as a particle that is moving away from
or veering off from thexaxis. No matter what dimensions
x(time)
y(space)
** The prospect of how time acceleration or deceleration can beachieved was discussed in the Winter 2010 and Summer 2013 issuesof the Pulseas well as the appendix of Transylvanian Moonrise.
*Rendering 3-D circumstances with a 2-D grid is no different than whata surveyor or architect do when they create a blueprint for a house.
S P E C I A L A C A D E M I C E D I T I O N
SPECIAL EDITION
SUMMER 2015
-
7/24/2019 Summer 15 Special Academic Edition
2/6
In the above diagram, the distance from the center of
the cross (point o) to point a is arbitrarily designated as
one second of time along the time axis. The distance from
point c to point b is identical. As we are not seeking to
expand our paradigm beyond the speed of light, we designate
the distance from the center of the cross point o to point
c (the same distance as point a to point b) as one light
second. As this is referring to the space axis, this is the same
as saying 300,000 kilometers (the distance light will travel in
one second based upon the speed of light). Our diagram now
features a square. Point b represents the time and space itwould taken for a unit of light to move in one second from
the center of the cross or axes. If we draw a line from b
to the center, we have the hypotenuse of a right triangle and
this automatically tells us that the angle of the line is 45
This line represents the actual speed of light. See below.
2
(continued from page 1)Light Cones...
(continued on page 3
(including multiple dimen-
sions) it traverses, it is re-
ferred to as the worldline in
modern physics. See right.
If we reference the
veering off of the time axisback to the frozen time sce-
nario, the character subject
to time manipulation will
be in a virtual bubble or containment eld that is no longer
moving in synch with the now unfrozen characters moving
along thexaxis in regular time. Additionally, this character
in the bubble is literally moving AWAY from the time axis in
a geometric sense, but it is important to emphasize that the
only reason he can veer off the time axis is because space-
time is being bent; and more specically, the space-time that
he is occupying. This is representative of the Doppler Effect
(or Doppler shift) which refers to the change in frequency of
a wave (or other periodic event) for an observer moving rela-
tive to its source. It is important to highlight the statement
there is a difference in frequency with regard to an object/
person in a time acceleration bubble. Just as a train appears
to be louder when it comes closer to an observer, so is there
an observable difference when something veers off of the
time line. Eventually, this results in an observable invisibility
of the person/object in the bubble. This is also what would
happen to a character in the previous sci- scenario subject
to time acceleration. He would be invisible.
The Doppler Effect in the above scenario is created bythe time reactor which is facilitating a curvature or literal
bending of space-time. The curvature of the time-warp
eld or time bubble is the focal point of the boundary layer
between elds. [NOTE: It was the lack of control of such
a boundary layer which compromised the sailors involved
in the Philadelphia Experiment].
In summary, an object subject to time acceleration will
veer off of the time line to the point where it will disap-
pear. There is, however, another factor involved and that
is the prospect that you can also cause something to veer
off by reason of time deceleration. This can cause the tra-
jectory of the object to wiggle back and forth to and fromthe time (x) axis (see right).
The act(s) of going back and
forth with either acceleration
or deceleration is changing
the relationship between the
worldline experience of the
object; and, in particular, its
continuing relationship to the
time axis.
x(time)
y(space)
We will now take all of this one step further by introduc
ing the concept of a light cone. If you look up the standard
physics denition of a light cone, you are likely to become
very confused if only because what is presented is not pre
sented in a simple fashion. They do not do a good job o
explaining it to laymen, and if they were not confused about i
themselves, they would already have brought this technology
into the world. To make this as simple as possible, and togive you a more subjective understanding of how time and
time control work, let us revisit our space-time axis again.
x(time)
y(space)one second
one light-second
a b
c
x(time)
y(space)
b
hypotenuse at
45 angle
x(time)
y(space)
worldline
We have not chosen to entertain scenarios that exceed the
speed of light. Therefore, if we are positioned at the center
of the axes or cross, we cannot veer off the time axis more
than 45 on either side. This is the basis for conceiving of
what is called a light cone. See the following diagram.
o
-
7/24/2019 Summer 15 Special Academic Edition
3/6
3
Note that if you place yourself at the original center
point of where the axes (axesis the plural of axis) stand or
stood, you have a light cone in front of you (representing
the future) and another behind you (representing the past).
To be more accurate, this two-dimensional format can be
extrapolated into three dimensions where what appear as
light vectors in the 2-D illustration above would manifest
as funnels or cones of light in 3-D. If we start at the center
and move upward (as far as the diagrams are concerned), we
can never move more than 45 away from the vertical time
axis providing we do not exceed the speed of light. Under
such conditions, this means that all worldlines (experience
of particles) can never leave the bounds of the light cone.
Keep in mind, however, that this is a purely mathematical
framework and what we know as the past or history is simply
a reverse direction. It also means, however, that movement
into the past cannot exceed the speed of light. See below.
(continued from page 2)Light Cones... In the scenario where surpassing light speed is not allowed, one cannot move out of the 45 restriction within the
realm of the light cone(s). There is, however, at least one
principle which makes this a moot point and enables time
travel to occur at sub-light speed. This has to do with the
scientic principle that space-time is curved. You migh
have heard of Einsteins precept that if you travelled long
enough in a straight line that you would eventually returnto the point of origin. This is no different than the concep
of an ourobourus, a snake eating its tail. This curvature of
space-time, however, has other implications. If you look a
the previous diagrams and visualize a particle veering off the
time axis, it will never be able to cross the 45 angle. BUT
if you can tip the light cone itself from its original path (this
is in addition to any trajectory it might be experiencing as a
result of independent time acceleration/deceleration) through
gravitational*(or some other) force exerted upon it, this wil
manifest as a series of light cones. If the light cones are tilted
sufciently and on a continuing basis, it is readily observable
that their path can return to a point in the past.
(continued on page 4)
light cones
in 2-D
format
In the above diagram, the very center is designated as
Here-Now. The inside of the upper cone is designated as
the future of Here-Now which includes all possible futures
within the speed of light reference frame. The bottom cone
includes the entirety of the past of Here-Now.
It is very important to grasp the idea that every point in
space-time is represented as having its own light cone and
that includes different potentialities every step of the way.
We are breaking down reality in this way to what might be
conceived of as digital space wherein virtually every spot
in space is like a pixel on a video screen and each with its
own set of light cones.
t(time axis)
y(space axis)
Here-Now
all potentialfuture events
all potentialpast events
t(time axis)
y(space axis)
*The prospect that gravity can actually bend space-time was a part ofEinsteins General Theory of Relativity that was actually demonstratedto be true and is accepted as a scientic fact.
This circular path of light cones, by the way, are what
is known as a Closed Timelike Curve, a conceptual theory
introduced by Kurt Gdel in the 1940s. This is somewha
of a catch word that people bandy about and do not truly
understand. While it is a wormhole-like pathway to the
past at sub-light speed, the model above, as it stands, does
not really allow for time travel to the past that is prior to the
original formation of the curved space-time. This objective
-
7/24/2019 Summer 15 Special Academic Edition
4/6
4
Light Cones... (continued from page 3)however, can be achieved by bending the time axis exces-
sively so that the worldline of the light cones is emulating
an ouroboros to the point where the snake is moving to
a point that is beneath the space axis or, more specically,
where the space axis once was. If you look at the illustra-
tion below which begins with the original space-time axis,I have turned it 45 and then did this repeatedly (for a total
of ve times inclusive) in order to demonstrate that bending
space-time in such a manner allows for the worldline (rep-
resented by the continuous outer line below) to turn back to
a point that is earlier than the point below designated as the
original space-time axis. This is travelling into the past
t
y
t(tim
eaxis)
y(spaceaxis)
45t
(timeaxis)
y(spaceaxis)
45
t
(time
axis)
y(space)
t
(timeaxis)
y(spaceaxis)
t (timea
xis)
y(sp
acea
xis)
original space-time axis
worldline (continuous)
and to a past that is previous to the original point where the
path of our light cones began. Depending upon the manner
in which these bends of space-time have been engineered,
it could take one to the ancient past.
In the scenario laid out above, we have an object (within
a eld) that is subjected to time acceleration (represented by
the continuous worldline) that is additionally or simultane-ously being subjected to a continuous series of events where
time is being bent. This can described as a Closed Timelike
Curve within or subjected to another Closed Timelike Curve;
and it is by this procedure that one can travel to a point prior
to when your time machine was created. This is bending
time within time that is already being bent.
What I have laid out above is pure theory; and while
it is a sound theory, it is meaningless unless it can actually
be engineered into reality. The rst clue that conventional
physics (outside of secret projects such as the Philadelphia
Experiment) had that this might be possible was in 1974
when Dr. Frank Tipler offered a theoretical system by which
light cones could be tipped. His theory included the prospec
that a piece of matter ten times the mass of the sun could be
compressed into a long and thin super-dense cylinder and
rotated at a speed at least half light speed. The distortion
in space-time would create gravity through the principle ofcentrifugal force and thereby tip the light clones. This mode
was admired by physicists as it does not violate science. I
also creates closed timelike curves and allows for all sorts
of travel between points in the past and the future. While
Tiplers model holds up to scientic theory, it is neither
pragmatic nor feasible. David has taken an approach tha
does not require the impractical logistical requirements of
Tiplers model.
While it is a given that gravity is indeed a scientically
recognized means of bending space-time, I have taken notice
that the word gravitydoes not appear in either the patent
or description of the Anderson Time ReactorTM. David has
always stated that gravity is a label we put on something we
do not understand. More relevant is the fact that gravity
is curved space-time in action. In other words, the very
act of curving space-time is a senior or causation factor with
regard to gravity. Just as gravity is created by a whirling
cylinder of centrifugal force, so can such a force be created
by curving space-time. As the literal fabric of space-time
is being grabbed or twisted, not unlike a loose sock being
scooped up by the rotating brush of a vacuum cleaner, this
process is referred to as inertial frame dragging (which
also has more complicated explanations attached to it). Bycoupling two different areas of slightly twisted space-time, it
accesses or creates extremely high energy. The discovery of
this phenomena was a remarkable breakthrough and David
has coined a name for this energy: space-time motive force
If one has any doubts about the veracity of this, they can
watch his videos on youTube entitled:
Harvesting Space-Time Motive Force, Part I
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-OPgr7eXF0) and
Harvesting Space-Time Motive Force, Part II
(www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OwkV_BSrsw).
This was a remarkable breakthrough of Davids tha
has been unheralded and under appreciated by the world
(although this might be to his own advantage up to this
point). A properly constructed time reactor could supply the
entire world with all the energy it needs (the videos explain
this). The entire process would also be very inexpensive in
comparison to other solutions. Even more spectacular than
this relatively cheap means of energy, however, is the fact
(continued on page 5)
-
7/24/2019 Summer 15 Special Academic Edition
5/6
5
Light Cones......(continued from page 4)that this process of coupling two different areas of twisted
space-time facilitates the creation of dense elds of Closed
Timelike Curves (CTCs). Gravity, as applied in Tiplers
original model, is not necessary. It is the force or space-time
motive force that gets the job done.
All of this gives you a very clear abstract backgroundtheory of how his time reactor works. You can read his
website for a more advanced description, but the purpose
here is to reduce these concepts to the lowest common de-
nominator so that anyone with an understanding of the most
rudimentary knowledge of geometry can understand the
theory. While what he has written should be readily and eas-
ily understood by physicists, some of them have had a hostile
or incredulous response, even stating that if this were all
true, they could do it themselves. This is a rather immature
response to say the least. This sort of engineering requires
considerable access to resources most physicists will never
know. David understood this basic abstract over a quarterof a century ago and has been working on the development
of it ever since in the private sector.
David has reviewed my work herein in preparation for
a podcast he will do with me that will be offered for free
on iTunes and at www.digitalmontauk.com . He was very
pleased and stated that no one has ever before had the pa-
tience to explain light cones and closed timelike curves so
simply and that this article should nd its way into introduc-
tory physics texts in universities. This particular article has
been modied from my subscribers version of theMontauk
Pulsein order to make it more academic-oriented. He also
plans to send me further work along this line.
Recently, I have enjoyed the most lengthy and candid
conversations I have ever had with David. Even so, he has
to hold back as there is a lot he is guarded about talking
about and this includes any adventures into time by himself
or others. He is open to the idea of me visiting one of the
most advanced time control laboratories in the world but
when that might occur is still open to fate and also depends
upon both of our schedules.
I spent a long time studying for and preparing this article,
and I hope that it has broken open as many doors for you
as it has for me. My original understanding of time camethrough the tutelage of Preston Nichols. In The Montauk
Project, he stated that the data regarding the electromag-
netic bottle effect used in the Philadelphia Experiment was
classied, and he could not talk about it. What he did state
in that book, however, was that time was bent with a very
strong electromagnetic pulse. That is a different approach
but would still t into the theories mentioned previously. It
is very clear to me that the technology used at Montauk and
during the Philadelphia Experiment was a much cruder and
more risk-oriented endeavor than what David is doing.
Preston also stated that the researchers who studied the
Philadelphia Experiment determined that the sailors lost
their time references and lost their minds when they were
subjected to the electromagnetic bottle and that the solution
was to pump in a fake or virtual reality into the bottle so that
time travellers would not go crazy. This prospect, whethe
true or not, was the justication used for the mind-controtechnology that was developed. Thus far, we have heard
no indication that those subject to Davids technology have
had any need for a fake reality to be pumped into the self-
contained eld. The way he has approached the subject does
not seem to necessitate any need for mind control, but he does
state that we cannot separate time from human consciousness
and that observation of past times will affect reality. Security
is also an issue in these matters and that includes enforced
censorship and all that might come with it.
A sensitive point with all of these endeavors has been
the so-called boundary layer between one self-contained
eld and another. When it is unstable, dangerous radiationor radiation-like phenomena occurs that will literally scorch
or destroy whatever is in the boundary and not within the
bounds of the contained eld. Davids team has spent a lo
of time working on stabilizing the boundary issues, and it is
this prospect which suggests that there has been successful
adventures into the past and future.
As I studied all of this, it became evident to me that when
one is able to accelerate a self-contained eld, it will move
into the past. Further, that the greater the acceleration, the
further into the past the object will travel to. When we are
dealing with the aforementioned principles demonstrated inthe illustrations, the proverbial sky is the limit. Conversely
the greater the deceleration, the further into the future the
object will travel to. David conrmed to me that this is true
He also told me that the geophysical location of the time
reactor is a very important factor and that there is an area
in Transylvania which has evidence of what amounts to a
huge discharge of space-time motive force (the result of a
tapping of curved space-time). It is the largest evidence of
such a discharge on the planet and is located in Cioclovina
Cave. This, of course, suggests that this area which i
in the vicinity of the Golden Thrones as described in Radu
Cinamars The Secret Parchment is an area that was oris used for time travel. David and I found it a remarkable
oddity/synchronicity that I was in this very cave last Augus
14th. Several kilometers long, it is connected to at least seven
other caves and has the highest concentration of bat guano in
the world which has amalgamated with other minerals and
created a high concentration of exotic elements related to
the curving of space-time. All of this gives a much deepe
meaning to the experiences described in my book The White
Bat. I suggest you read it if you have not. n
-
7/24/2019 Summer 15 Special Academic Edition
6/6
The last few months have beensome of the most exciting ever at
Sky Books, and on June 13th, I
conducted an interview with Dr.
David Anderson on the subjects
included in this newsletter. It hasnow been released in the form of a
podcast which is available for free
on iTunes and also at www.digi-
talmontauk.com. It is Peter Moon
Podcast #8, and there are now,
as of this writing, a total of eight
podcasts from Peter Moon which
can be found at the same website.
If you are interested in the
work of Dr. David Anderson, you
are encouraged to visit his web-
site: www.andersoninstitute.com.
We will continue to give updates
on new developments from his
quarter in future editions of the
Montauk Pulse. There is also a
blog at www.digitalmontauk.com
which you are welcome to par-
ticipate in. If you have questions
or want further info, you can also
write to me at the following email
address: [email protected].
In the meantime, I am justputting the nishing touches on a
Spanish version of The Montauk
Project: Experiments in Time.
THE MONTAUK PULSE
Editor: PETER MOON
Writer: Peter Moon
by Preston Nichols & Peter MoonALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
No part of this publication may be pho-tocopied or used without permission
from the publisher.
For a subscription to the Pulse(4 issues annually) send $15.00 plus
$4.00 S/H (outside U.S. add $9.00 S/H).
PUBLISHED BY SKY BOOKSPO BOX 7 69, WESTBURY, NY 11590
From the Editor
The Montauk Pulse
Peter Moon
MONTAUKANDSPACE-TIMEWhat you are reading is a specialedition of a quarterly newsletter that
is based upon an event known as the
Montauk Project which was a series of
experiments that took place at MontaukPoint at a semi-abandoned military
facility known as Camp Hero which
featured a SAGE (Semi-Automatic
Ground Environment) radar installation
once used as the rst line of defense
by the U.S. military. While the precise
events of what happened at Camp Hero
during the 1970s and early 1980s is
classied and unknown, several people
came forward with stories of bizarre
experiments that have been described as
the most secretive and amazing research
project in recorded history.
This began with the classified
Philadelphia Experiment of 1943 where
invisibility experiments were conducted
aboard the USS Eldridgethat resulted in
full scale teleportation of the ship and
crew but had disastrous effects on the
mental and physical states of the indi-
viduals involved. A massive research
project began to study the human psyche
and how it interfaced with distortions inthe space-time continuum. This includ-
ed computer integration with the human
mind and radio frequency technology as
well as amplifying human emotions and
transmitting the frequencies of such so
as to affect the moods of populations.
Some of the most ambitious aspects
of the Montauk Project sought to tap
the powers of creation itself. The most
colorful of these endeavors included the
manipulation of time.
Most of what we know about the
Montauk Project comes from the ex-
periences and investigations of Preston
Nichols, a scientist who was involved in
the experiments. By the very nature of
what was done and the effort to cover
it up, it has been hard to verify many of
the various claims. There is, however,
enough circumstance and documenta-
tion to declare that the Montauk Project
did exist in some for or another. It has
earned the status of an urban legend that
will not go away.
Peter Moon served as the ghost
writer and publisher of these stories ina book entitled The Montauk Project:
Experiments in Time. His efforts to
verify the Montauk Project has resulted
in a series of many books which he has
published with Sky Books. He has is-
sued a quarterly newsletter since 1993,
The Montauk Pulse, which has contin-
ued to investigate this subject and the
many additional threads it has led to.
Dr. David Anderson met Peter in
1999 when he was living on Long Is-
land and was researching time control
under the auspices of The Time Travel
Research Center. The two have been
friends ever since and David arranged
for Peter to visit Romania in 2008 where
Peter has investigated and published
accounts of other space-time projects.
This includes The Transylvania Series
which tell the story of a Romanian
intelligence ofcers experience with
various projects. Peters most recent
book, The White Bat, is a summary ofthese adventures and includes his own
adventures in Transylvania.
Most of Peters adventures center
around his experiences with synchron-
icity, a phenomena he began to encoun-
ter as soon as he investigated various
threads of the Montauk Project.
In recent times, Peter has taken a
particular interest in breaking down the
work of Dr. Anderson in order to put it
into simple times so that humanity can
better understand the benets and pre-dicaments of time travel technology. If
Mankind is better educated, it can take
full advantage of these circumstances
and also defend itself against the hazards.
If you are interested in subscrib-
ing to the Montauk Pulse, see the
information and address to the right.
Also visit www.skybooksusa andwww.
digitalmontauk.com n