supercritical carbon dioxide in microchannel … supercritical...supercritical carbon dioxide in...
TRANSCRIPT
Supercritical Carbon Dioxide in Microchannel Devices for Advanced Thermal Systems
Brian M. Fronk
School of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing EngineeringOregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
March 30th, 2017
Presented at Oklahoma State University
Outline
1. My Background
2. Supercritical CO2 Solar Thermal Receivers
3. Experimental Microchannel sCO2 Heat Transfer
2
My Background
3
Oregon State University
4
…is Oregon’s Land Grant university with the mission to educate the students of the state; it is a public
research university with eleven colleges and the state’s primary research engineering program.
The College of
Engineering, by
the numbers:
10%growth in enrollment
(annual average)graduate students
1,304
196faculty in five
engineering schools
7,120undergraduate students
$55.0Mresearch funding
in 2016
School of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (MIME)
5
By The Numbers
54 1,900+ 340+ 2x-3x
Research
Faculty
Undergraduate
Students in
4 Majors
Graduate
Students in
4 Majors
Growth in Total
Enrollment over
the past 10 years
Research Interests
6
System Scale
• Concentrated Solar Thermal
• Waste Heat Recovery/CCHP
• Solar Thermal Heating
• Building Energy Systems (HVAC&R)
• Thermal Management Devices
Phenomena Scale
• Multiphase Heat and Mass Transfer
• Supercritical Heat Transfer
Energy Efficiency
Renewable Conversion
EnergyStorage
Concentrated Solar Power (CSP)
7http://www.desertsun.com/story/tech/science/energy/2015/01/22/abengoa-big-plans-solar-towers-desert/22186683/
Next Gen Solar Thermal
8
• Current central receivers operate
at 30 – 100 W cm-2
• Receiver cost estimated
$100-$200/kWt
• Future receiver improvements:• Smaller and simpler design
• Increase thermal transfer efficiency
• Increase receiver exit temperature
• Decrease cost per kWt
• Leverage sCO2 Brayton Cycles
Conboy T, Wright S, Pasch J, Fleming D, Rochau G, Fuller R. Performance Characteristics of an Operating Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle. ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2012;134(11):111703-111703-12. doi:10.1115/1.4007199
Microchannel Receiver Concept
• Demonstrated 90% thermal efficiency at 2 x 2 cm scale
9L’Estrange T, Truong E, Rymal C, et al. High Flux Microscale Solar Thermal Receiver for Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycles. ASME 2015 13th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels:V001T03A009. doi:10.1115/ICNMM2015-48233.
Research Question
Can micropin devices be scaled to megawatt capacities?
10
Numbering Up Concept
11Zada K. R., Hyder M. B., Drost M. K., Fronk B. M. Numbering-Up of Microscale Devices for Megawatt-Scale Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Concentrating Solar Power Receivers. ASME. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;138(6):061007-061007-9. doi:10.1115/1.4034516
Unit-Cell Level
12
Thermal Model
[9]13
Thermal Model
16
23 sCOQ Q
2 2 2( )sCO sCO s W sCOQ h A T T
Thermal Network Model
18
Module Level
19
Multi-Unit Cell Module
Module Level
20
Flow Distribution Model
21
Module Level Results
22
Fluid Inlet Temperature 550°C
Incident flux 140 W cm-2
System Pressure 250 bar
Ambient Temperature 20°C
Wind Speed 2 m s-1
Module Level Results
23
Fluid Inlet Temperature 550°CFluid Outlet Temperature
720°C
System Pressure 250 barNumber of Unit Cells per
Module6
Mass flow rate Varying
Receiver Model
250 Modules = 250 MW thermal input
24Zada K. R., Hyder M. B., Drost M. K., Fronk B. M. Numbering-Up of Microscale Devices for Megawatt-Scale Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Concentrating Solar Power Receivers. ASME. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;138(6):061007-061007-9. doi:10.1115/1.4034516
Receiver Model Results
25Zada K. R., Hyder M. B., Drost M. K., Fronk B. M. Numbering-Up of Microscale Devices for Megawatt-Scale Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Concentrating Solar Power Receivers. ASME. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;138(6):061007-061007-9. doi:10.1115/1.4034516
Modular Receiver Concept
26
Conclusions
• Pathway to megawatt scale demonstrated
• Modular concept advantageous• Tailored receiver design
• Manufacturability
• Physical test article designs generated• Pin-level CFD (Dr. S. Apte – OSU)
• Manufacturing (Dr. B. Paul – OSU)
• Materials/Solid Mechanics (Dr. R. Maholtra – OSU)
• Reciever Structural Analysis (Dr. D. Borello - OSU)
27
Ongoing Work
28
Supercritical CO2
29
Tcritical (ᵒC/ᵒF) 31.0 / 87.9
Pcritical (kPa/PSI) 7377.3 / 1072
Applied Science, 2011, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gCTKteN5Y4
Supercritical CO2 Heat Transfer
30
How to Exploit?
• Supercritical Brayton
• HVAC&R (cooling)
• Thermal Management?
31Fronk B. M., Rattner A. S. High-Flux Thermal Management With Supercritical Fluids. ASME. J. Heat Transfer. 2016;138(12):124501-124501-4. doi:10.1115/1.4034053.
Convective Heat Transfer
32
Thermophysical Property Variation
• Buoyancy Effects
• Bulk Flow Acceleration
• Flow Profile Changes
Heat Transfer
Affected
Convective Heat Transfer
33
Stratification of low-density fluid
DH = 10.9 mm
Pidiparti et al., 2015
Pidaparti S, Jarahbashi D, Anderson M, Ranjan D. Unusual Heat Transfer Characteristics of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. 2015. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Volume 8A: Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering:V08AT10A040. doi:10.1115/IMECE2015-51225.
Research Objectives
1. Experimentally investigate heat transfer for single-wall applied heat flux in small diameter channels
2. Evaluate applicability of convective heat transfer correlations
3. Create a publically available database
4. Use data to verify DES models (Dr. A. Rattner PSU)
34
Experimental Facility
35
Experimental Facility
36
Test Section Design
37
Test Section
Heat Length (mm) 20
Development Length (-) 40D
Hydraulic Diameter (mm) 0.75
Number of Channels (-) 5
Aspect Ratio (-) 1:1
Measurement Technique
38
Measurement Technique
39
Test Section Fabrication
40
Dh (mm) 0.75
AR (-) 1:1
Type Channel
Dh (mm) 0.75
AR (-) 2:1
Type Channel
Dh (mm) 0.75
AR (-) N/A
Type Staggered Pin
Test Section Fabrication
41
Test Section Fabrication
42
Dh (mm) 0.75
AR (-) 1:1
Type Channel
Dh (mm) 0.75
AR (-) 2:1
Type Channel
Dh (mm) 0.75
AR (-) N/A
Type Staggered Pin
Test Section Fabrication
43
Reduced Pressure (-) 1.03 1.1
Mass Flux (kg m-2 s-1) 500 500 1000
Heat Flux (W cm-2) 20 40
Inlet Temperature (°C) 20 – 100 20 – 100
44
Experimental Matrix
Dh (mm) 0.75
AR (-) 1:1
Type Channel
Heat Transfer Results
45
Heat Transfer Results
46
Heat Transfer Results
47
Tpc ≈ 35.4°CTpc ≈ 32.4°C
Single-Phase Correlations
48
Dittus and Boelter, 1930
Wu and Little, 1984
Adams et al., 1998
Importance of Buoyancy?
50
Conclusions
1. Functioning supercritical facility (up to 18 Mpa & 200°C)
2. High heat transfer coefficients measured• Poor correlation predictive capability (under prediction)
• Geometry and boundary conditions
3. Buoyancy effects potentially play a role in heat transfer
51
Ongoing Work
52
1. Investigation of different geometry and orientation
2. 2nd Generation experiment • Lower uncertainty
• Higher heat fluxes
3. Develop new test article, local HTC
Acknowledgments
• TEST Lab Students
• SunShot Collaborators
• Dr. M. K. Drost (OSU)
• Dr. S. Apte (OSU)
• Dr. B. Paul (OSU)
• Dr. H. Wang (OSU)
• Dr. R. Maholtra (OSU)
• Dr. V. Narayanan (UC-Davis)
• Dr. O. Dogan (NETL)
• Dr. A. Rattner
53
Questions?
54