superresolution technology for reduction of the far-field diffraction spot size in the laser...
TRANSCRIPT
Optics Communications 228 (2003) 271–278
www.elsevier.com/locate/optcom
Superresolution technology for reduction of thefar-field diffraction spot size in the laser
free-space communication system
Jia Jia *, Changhe Zhou, Liren Liu
Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 800-211, Shanghai 201800, PR China
Received 21 May 2003; received in revised form 29 August 2003; accepted 14 October 2003
Abstract
In the free-space laser communication there is sometimes a strong need for reduction of the diffraction spot size in
the far field. In this paper, instead of the usage of the larger size aperture lens in the free-space laser communication
system, we introduce diffractive superresolution technology to design and fabricate a cheap pure-phase plate for re-
alizing the smaller spot size than the usual Airy spot size, which can decrease the weight and size of the emitting lens.
We have calculated 2, 3, 4, 5 circulation zones for optimizing the highest energy compression (Strehl ratio) with the
constraint of the First zero ratio value G¼ 0.8. Numerical results show that the 2- or 3-circular zone pure-phase plate
can yield the highest Strehl ratio ðS � 0:59Þ with the constraint of G¼ 0.8, but the 4, 5 circular zone binary phase (0,pÞplates are calculated to yield the result of S � 0:57 with G¼ 0.8. We have fabricated 2- and 3-circular zone binary phase
plate with binary optics technology. Finally, we have established an experimental system for simulation of the free-
space laser communication to verify the advantage of the superresolution phase plate. Detailed experiments are pre-
sented.
� 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PACS: 42.30.Kq; 42.40.Jv; 42.79.Cj; 42.79.Sz; 42.82.Cr
Keywords: Fourier optics; Computer-generated holograms; Zone plates; Optical-communication systems; Lithography
1. Introduction
In the free-space laser communication applica-
tion, the intensity at the far field is the Fraunhofer
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86215991-1214; fax:
+86216991-8800.
E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Jia).
0030-4018/$ - see front matter � 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserv
doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2003.10.011
diffraction of the incident light, which is also the
Fourier transform of the intensity of the incident
light. The size of the diffraction spot in the receive
port in the free-space laser communication system
can also be calculated by the well-known Airy
pattern: x ¼ 1:22ðkL=DÞ [1,2], where D is the ap-
erture of the emitting lens and L is the distancebetween the emitting lens and the receiver and k is
the wavelength of the laser. In the specific array
ed.
272 J. Jia et al. / Optics Communications 228 (2003) 271–278
laser communication applications, as shown in
Fig. 1, there is need for a technology that can
decrease the size of the diffraction spot in the re-
ceiver port because in the free-space laser com-
munication a smaller diffraction spot in the receive
port makes the transmit data more secure. Thewavelength of the laser and the distance between
the emitting lens and the received are usually fixed.
So a larger aperture lens is often employed to
realize the small far-field spot. However, a larger-
sized lens is very expensive, and worse, a larger-
sized lens is usually not available due to the
fabrication technology.
Superresolution technology provides an attrac-tive approach to this application. Superresolution
technique is one of the methods that realize the
diffraction spot smaller than the Airy spot when a
superresolution pure-phase plate is employed. The
first significant study of superresolution was put
forward by Francia [3]. Much attention was de-
voted to the design of the superresolution phase
plate for its applications in enhanced resolutionconfocal system [4], increased storage in optical
disk system [5], etc. More sophisticated methods
based on continuous amplitude transmittance
function have also been developed [6]. Hybrid
Receiver 1
Receiver N
x
Laser 1
Laser 2
1
2
Distance L
Receiver 2
Laser N
Fig. 1. Illustration of an arrayed laser communication system
for the multi-channel increased transmitting capacity. Each
laser should generate its Frauhofer diffraction in the far field. 1,
2 means the intensity distribution in the laser 1, 2 diffraction
field. The signal channels should not disturb the nearby channel
for the diffraction effect of each channel. The receivers can be
put at an optimized closer distance when a superresolution
phase plate is used without resorting to a larger aperture laser
emitting lens.
amplitude-phase elements with two zones, as well
as elements for use in optical pick-up heads have
been studied [7]. Various superresolution com-
pression parameters such as Strehl ratio (S), First
zero (G), have been defined to describe the super-
resolution effect. The Strehl ratio is defined as theratio between the intensity of the superresolution
pattern and the intensity of the Airy pattern, both
calculated at the origin. The First zero is defined as
the ratio between the first zero position of the
superresolution pattern and the first zero position
of the airy pattern. For more details of superres-
olution technology and its applications, one can
see [6–9]. The widely used Full-width-half-maxi-mum (FWHM) is closely related with the first zero
position (G), and the central-lobe energy percent-
age, the ratio of the central lobe energy at the zero
order to the whole energy at all diffraction orders,
is closed related with the Strehl ratio (S). As the
diffraction efficiency is the most important pa-
rameter for practical applications, we will present
the superresolution scheme of the pure-phase platein this paper because of high diffraction efficiency.
As to the best of our knowledge, no one has
pointed out the possibility that superresolution
technology can be applied in the free-space laser
communication system. We introduce the super-
resolution technology into the free-space laser
communication system to compress the far-field
diffractive spot size. With this proposed technol-ogy, we typically place a filter at the exit pupil of
the system and thus the smaller diffraction spot
can be obtained with the same aperture lens. In
this paper, we prescribe the criterion of G6 0:8,while S should be as large as possible for practical
application. If G is too small, such as G6 0:6, themainlobe in the diffraction spot is too small to be
applied in practice. If G is too large such as G ffi 1,the too small reduction of the diffraction spot size
is not interesting for practical use.
In this paper, we have calculated the 2, 3, 4, 5
circular zones for optimizing the highest Strehl
ratio with the constraint of the First zero value
G ¼ 0:8, and have found the optimized radius and
phases of the phase plate. Finally, we have set up
an experimental system for simulation of theFourier transform in the laser long-distance com-
munication. The experimental results have verified
J. Jia et al. / Optics Communications 228 (2003) 271–278 273
the numerical results and confirm the effectiveness
of the superresolution phase plate.
2. Review of superresolution theory
In a traditional sense, the Airy resolution is
defined by the distance from the first zero position
of the main peak intensity spot. Superresolution
technology means that we can realize a smaller
diffraction spot than an Airy diffraction spot. A
pure-phase plate that is put before (or after ) the
diffraction-limited lens is involved to realize the
superresolution effect, as is shown in Fig. 2.According to the superresolution diffractive
theory [6] the normalized field measured at the
observation plane is given by:
uðm; lÞ ¼Z 1
0
P ðqÞ expð�jlq2=2ÞJ0ðmqÞqdq; ð1Þ
m ¼ kr sinðaÞ;
l ¼ 4kzðsinðaÞ=2Þ2;
k ¼ 2p=k; sinðaÞ ¼ NA;
where l, m are the axial and radial coordinates,
P ðqÞ is the pupil function (which is also called the
diffractive phase plate). From Eq. (1), we can get
uðm; 0Þ ¼Z 1
0
PðqÞJ0ðmtÞdt; ð2Þ
where l ¼ 0 in the focal plane
Collimated
laser beam (λ)
Superresolution
pure-phase plate
Fig. 2. The superresolution experimental system for simulation of th
munication system.
uð0; lÞ ¼Z 1
0
P ðqÞ expð�jlq2=2Þdq; ð3Þ
where m ¼ 0 in the axial plane.So in the focal plane, the radial amplitude dis-
tribution is the Hankel transform of the pupil
function, while the axis amplitude distribution isthe Fourier transform of the pupil function. In the
superresolution field, there are many methods to
design the pure-phase plate. Due to ease of fabri-
cation, we choose the circular binary phase-only
plate in this paper. The structure of the 3 zone
circular binary phase-only plate is shown in Fig. 3.
If we put the circular phase-only plate into the
optical system, the diffractive field can be describedas
wðnÞ ¼XNj¼1
expði/jÞ½a2j2J1ðajnÞ=ajn
� a2j�12J1ðaj�1nÞ=aj�1n�; ð4Þwhere aj and /j represent the radius and phase of
the jth zone, respectively. If the binary phases are
chosen to be only 0 and /, we can rewrite Eq. (4)
as
wðnÞ ¼ 2J1ðnÞ=n� ½1� expði/0Þ�ð�1ÞNþ1
�XN�1
j¼1
ð�1Þj � a2j2J1ðajnÞ=ajn: ð5Þ
In numerical simulations, we will apply Eq. (5) tocalculate the 2, 3, 4, 5 circular zones of the phase
plate. According to the compression criterion, we
will find the optimized parameters: the radius and
phase value of each zone.
focal plane
D
CCD
camera
e far-field diffraction in the long-distance free-space laser com-
0
0
a b
1.0
Φ
Fig. 3. The normalized structure of the 3 zone binary pure-
phase plate, a, b are the radii of the phase-transition circles
between the phase 0 and U.
274 J. Jia et al. / Optics Communications 228 (2003) 271–278
3. Optimization algorithms and numerical results
We have used the global searching algorithms in
our computer simulations. The global searching
algorithm is to find the optimized result in the
whole searching areas with changing each radius at
a minimum searching step. The advantage of this
algorithm is that it can find the optimized result,
but the searching time is quite long.Numerical results of the Strehl ratio (S) and
First zero ðS ¼ 0:8Þ and the central-lobe energy
percentage with the radius (a) and the phase are
given in Table 1. From Table 1, we know that the
largest Strehl ratio S ¼ 0:5911, which is the Strehl
ratio of the 2 zone phase plate. From numerical
results of the First zero and Strehl ratio with two
radius a and b of the 3 zone phase plate, we findthe best optimized result under the constraint
Table 1
Numerical result of the multi-zones superresolution phase plate with
Zone no. Search step Optimized numerical result
Normalized radius
2 0.01 a¼ 0.34
3 0.03 a¼ 0.09, b¼ 0.36
4 0.08 a¼ 0.16, b¼ 0.24,
c¼ 0.40
5 0.10 a¼ 0.1, b¼ 0.2, c¼ 0.4,
d ¼ 0.9
See Fig. 3 for the meaning of the normalized radius a, b.
of G ¼ 0:8 as: a ¼ 0:09; b ¼ 0:36;U ¼ 0:9p;G ¼0:7979; SMAX ¼ 0:5835. The central-lobe energy
percentage that is closely related with the Strehl
ratio is calculated and given in Table 1. The
maximum central-lobe energy percentage is 39% in
Table 1 while it is 84% for the Airy diffractiondistribution. The far-field intensity distribution of
this optimized numerical result is shown in Fig. 4.
From Fig. 4, we can see that the superresolution
technology can yield a smaller diffractive size in
the far field than that in the Airy spot.
We have also studied the effect of the multiple
phase modulation for the 3 zone plate with the
same optimized two radius a ¼ 0:09 and b ¼ 0:36.The inner zone phase is always assumed to be zero.
The optimized phases are as follows: /1 ¼ 0:00p;/2 ¼ 0:06p;/3 ¼ 0:86p, and the Strehl ratio
Smax ¼ 0:5905. Note that this optimized Strehl ra-
tio S ¼ 0:59 with the multiple phases is a little
higher than the optimized S ¼ 0:5835 with the bi-
nary phases. This result illustrates that the multi-
ple-phase modulation can indeed improve theperformance but at a much higher cost for fabri-
cation than the binary phase modulation.
The numerical simulation results of the 4 and 5
zone phase plates give the maximum S � 0:57 with
G ¼ 0:8. We realized from our numerical result
that the S could not be increased with the increase
of the zone numbers. Numerical comparison of the
2- and 3-zones plate in Table 1 is given in Fig. 4.From Fig. 4, we can see that FWHM (Superre-
solved) is smaller than the FWHM (Airy). If the
maximum intensity of the superresolved pattern is
normalized from 0.59 to 1, the FWHM keeps un-
changed because of the fixed first zero position.
the prescribed First zero (G ¼ 0:8)
U ðpÞ Strehl ratio Central lobe energy (%)
1.0 0.5911 38.83
0.9 0.5835 36.06
0.9 0.5645 35.06
0.9 0.5587 13.16
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.00
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9superresolved pattern(3-zones)superresolved pattern(2-zones)Airy pattern
Relative radial distance
1/2FWHM (Airy)
1/2FWHM (Superresolved)
No
rmal
ized
Inte
nsi
ty
Fig. 4. Theoretical far-field intensity distribution of the Airy (solid line) and the superresolution diffraction (dashed line) patterns with
the 2- and 3-zones plates in Table 1. The superresolution pattern generated by the 2- and 3-zones plates are quite close to each other.
The receiver 2 can be at the first zero position of the superresolution pattern that is 0.8 times closer to receiver 1 than the Airy pattern.
FWHM is the Full-width-half-maximum of the diffraction distribution. We can see that the FWHM (Superresolved) is smaller than the
FWHM (Airy).
J. Jia et al. / Optics Communications 228 (2003) 271–278 275
Thus, the FWHM of the superresolved distribu-
tion is indeed reduced compared with the FWHM
of the Airy distribution. From Fig. 4, we can also
see that there is little difference between 2- and 3-
zones plates. Fabrication of the three zone phase
plate can demonstrate the capability that we can
also fabricate the 2-zone phase plate. So we choose
the 3-zone binary phase plate for the experiment,which is given in the next section.
4. Fabrication and experimental results
VLSI techniques have been adopted in our ex-
periment to obtain the phase plate. The mask is
made with electro-beam writing method. We havefabricated two three-zone mask with the apertures
of 2 and 20 mm that are designed from Table 1 as
follows: a ¼ 91:3 lm, b ¼ 360 lm, r3 ¼ 1 mm; and
a ¼ 913 lm, b ¼ 3600 lm, r3 ¼ 10 mm, respec-
tively. The phase plate of the aperture size of 2 mm
can generate a larger central diffraction spot that is
more easily captured by the CCD camera than that
with the aperture size of 20 mm. Larger-sized
phase plates can also be fabricated in principle.
Then a thin layer of photoresist is spun onto a
glass substrate. We transfer the mask pattern into
photoresist through photolithographic technology.
In our experiment, the photoresist is Shipley
S1818. The contact copy error is within 0.5 lm.
We use the wet chemical etching (WCE) method
[10,11] to transfer the photoresist pattern into theglass substrate.
The glass substrate has a refractive index of
n ¼ 1:52. The expected etching depth correspond-
ing to 0.9p in Table 1 is 548 nm. We use the Taylor
Hobson step height standand to measure the sur-
face relief profile of the phase plate. The surface
relief profile of the superresolution phase plate is
shown in Fig. 5. The measure depth is 518 nm, thephase error is smaller than 5%.
We have set up an experimental system, as
shown in Fig. 2, to simulate the far-field diffraction
free-space laser communication. The He–Ne laser
with a wavelength of 633 nm is used as the light
source. A diffraction-limited lens with a focal
length f ¼ 550 mm is used to yield the Airy dif-
fraction pattern in its focal pattern that is captured
Fig. 5. The surface relief profile of the fabricated superresolution phase plate of the 3-zones plate in Table 1.
276 J. Jia et al. / Optics Communications 228 (2003) 271–278
by a CCD camera and shown in Fig. 6(a). When
the fabricated phase plate of Fig. 5 is inserted and
aligned with the aperture of the lens, a superreso-lution diffraction pattern is generated, which is
shown in Fig. 6(b). Comparison of the Airy pat-
tern and the superresolution pattern is done off-
line in the computer and shown in Fig. 7. From
Fig. 7, we can see that the experimental results are
in good agreement with the theoretical results, and
that the fabricated superresolution phase plate do
generate a smaller central spot ðG � 0:8Þ thanthe Airy spot. This result demonstrated the possi-
bility that a superresolution phase plate can be
incorporated in free-space laser communication
system for reduction of the far-field diffraction
spot size.
Fig. 6. The experimental image of the diffraction spot of Airy
pattern (a) and the superresolution pattern (b) with the 3-zones
plate of Fig. 5. We can see that the central spot of (b) is smaller
and especially the first ring of (b) is a little wider and brighter
than that of the well-known Airy pattern (a).
5. Conclusion
Reduction of the far-field diffraction size in thefree-space laser communication system is always
interesting. The wavelength, the distance, and the
aperture size of the emitting lens are usually con-
sidered to this end. The wavelength that is related
with the available laser and the distance between
the transmitter and the receiver are usually fixed,
so a larger sized lens has to be fabricated at a much
higher cost and sometimes unavailable due to thelimit of the fabrication technology. The superres-
olution technology can realize the smaller central
diffraction spot size in the far field than the usual
Airy spot size. So the superresolution technology is
very interesting in the free-space laser communi-
cation system. A superresolution phase plate is
much cheaper than the larger aperture lens, which
is the essential motivation of this work.We have calculated the 2, 3, 4, 5 circular zones
for optimizing the highest energy compression
(Strehl ratio) with the constraint of the First zero
value G ¼ 0:8. Numerical results show that the 2-
circular zone pure-phase plate can yield the highest
Strehl ratio (S ¼ 0.59) with the constraint of
G ¼ 0:8. The 3 zone phase plate with 0.9p phase
modulation yields the largest Strehl ratio S ¼ 0:58with the constraint of G ¼ 0:8. The 3-circular zonepure-phase plates with the respective phases of
U1U2U3 have also been calculated. At the same
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1experimenttheoryAiry pattern
Superresolution pattern
Fig. 7. Experimental comparison of the superresolution diffraction distribution with the Airy diffraction with the superresolution
phase plate of Fig. 6, which are represented by the dotted line (experiments) and the solid line (theory), respectively. Experimental
results verify that a smaller central spot (G�0.8) than the Airy spot has been achieved.
J. Jia et al. / Optics Communications 228 (2003) 271–278 277
time the 4, 5 circular zone binary phase (0,pÞ plateshave been calculated to yield the result of S ¼ 0:57with G ¼ 0:8. We realized from our numerical re-sults that it might be not necessary to calculate
more zone phase plate for a higher Strehl ratio.
The efficiency of the superresolution phase plate
may be enhanced by using a multi-phase modu-
lation, which is the future work.
It should be noted that using a stronger or a
weaker laser intensity should yield the same nor-
malized Airy diffraction pattern in the far field, thefirst zero position will not be changed. Air turbu-
lence, absorption and scattering are not considered
in this paper. The preassumed condition using a
superresolution phase plate is that the emitting lens
should be diffraction-limited. If the emitting lens is
not diffraction limited, it is not necessary to use the
superresolution phase plate proposed in this paper.
In summary, we have studied the superresolu-tion technology for generating the small diffraction
spot size in the far field. We have presented nu-
merical simulation results and we have also given
experimental results as a simulation of reduction
of the far-field diffraction size in the laser free-
space communication system. We have set up an
experimental system to detect such a smaller dif-
fraction spot size in the far field that is generated
by using the superresolution plate above. Two
phase plate with an aperture size of 2 and 20 mm
has been fabricated with the microlithingraphictechnology. We have obtained the experimental
image of the smaller diffraction spot using the su-
perresolution phase plate in this experimental
system. More larger-sized superresolution phase
plate can be fabricated in principle. But the smaller
diffraction spot resulting from the superresolution
technology always causes the energy loss in the
mainlobe. And the lossing energy is transferredinto the sidelobes. Careful avoidance of the in-
tensity in the sidelobes would not cause the serious
communication problem. So this technology can
be applied when the laser energy is not the main
concern in the communication. Experimental re-
sult has verified the possibility that by using a
superresolution phase plate matching the emitting
laser lens, a smaller central diffraction spot can beobtained in the far-field than Airy pattern.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge financial support
from the National Outstanding Youth Foundation
of China (60125512, 60177016).
278 J. Jia et al. / Optics Communications 228 (2003) 271–278
References
[1] M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, seventh ed.,
University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999.
[2] J.W. Goodman, Introduction to the Fourier Optics, second
ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996.
[3] G.T. di Francia, Nuovo Cimento Suppl. 9 (1952) 426.
[4] D.J. Brady, Opt. Lett. 24 (1999) 811.
[5] M. Bertero, J. Opt. So. Am. A 15 (1998) 2275.
[6] T.R.M. Sales, G.M. Morris, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 14 (1997)
1637.
[7] T.R.M. Sales, G.M. Morris, Opt. Lett. 22 (1997) 582.
[8] I.J. Cox, C.J.R. Sheppard, T. Wilson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72
(1982) 1287.
[9] H. Ando, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31 (1992) 557.
[10] C. Zhou, L. Liu, Appl. Opt. 34 (1995) 5961.
[11] P. Xi, C. Zhou, E. Dai, L. Liu, Opt. Lett. 27 (2002)
228.