supplemental subsurface investigation report

SUPPLEMENTAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT

Property:

TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01‐399 19740 Viking Avenue Northwest Poulsbo, Washington

Ecology Facility ID: 68211258

Report Date:

December 30, 2013

DRAFT – ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW

Prepared for:

TOC Holdings Co. 2737 West Commodore Way Seattle, Washington

P:\0440 TOC Holdings Co\01‐399 Poulsbo\Deliverables\2013\SSI\01‐399_2013SSIReport_DFCR.docx

Supplemental Subsurface Investigation Report

Prepared for:

TOC Holdings Co. 2737 West Commodore Way Seattle, Washington 98199

Property:

TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01‐399 19740 Viking Avenue Northwest Poulsbo, Washington 98370

Ecology Facility ID: 68211258

Project No.: 0440‐038

Prepared by:

DRAFT __________________ Elizabeth Forbes Staff Geologist

Reviewed by:

DRAFT ___________________ Ryan K. Bixby LG #1691 President

December 30, 2013

Draft – Issue for Client Review

SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1

2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND .................................................................... 1

3.0 PROPERTY GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY ...................................................................... 2

4.0 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND INTERIM REMEDIAL ACTIONS ......................................... 2

5.0 2013 SUPPLEMENTAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION .......................................................... 3

5.1 SOIL BORING PLACEMENT ............................................................................................ 4

5.2 DRILLING ....................................................................................................................... 4

5.3 SAMPLE COLLECTION ................................................................................................... 5

5.4 MANAGEMENT OF INVESTIGATIVE DERIVED WASTE ................................................... 5

5.5 ANALYTICAL RESULTS ................................................................................................... 5

6.0 DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................................... 6

7.0 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................... 6

8.0 LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 6

9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................... 7

FIGURES

1 Property Location Map

2 Exploration Location Plan

3 Historical Soil Analytical Results for Samples Exceeding MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels

4 2013 Confirmational Soil Analytical Results

TABLE

1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results

APPENDICES

A Boring Logs

B Laboratory Analytical Reports Friedman and Bruya, Inc. #306184

Friedman and Bruya, Inc. #306185 Friedman and Bruya, Inc. #306186

Supplemental Subsurface Investigation Report Draft – Issued for Client Review

SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. (SoundEarth, formerly Sound Environmental Strategies Corporation [SES]) has prepared this report for TOC Holdings Co. to document the results of the supplemental subsurface investigation (SSI) activities conducted by SoundEarth on June 10, 11, and 12, 2013, at the TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01‐399, located at 19740 Viking Avenue Northwest in Poulsbo, Washington (the Property). The Property location is shown on Figure 1. Property features are depicted on Figure 2.

According to Washington State Department of Ecology’s Guidelines for Property Cleanups Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program, dated July 2008, a “site” is defined by the nature and extent of contamination associated with one or more releases of hazardous substances prior to any cleanup of that contamination. Based on this definition of a site and that provided in Chapter 173‐340 of Section 200 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC 173‐340‐200), the TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01‐399 site (the Site) includes the full lateral and vertical extent of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination that resulted from the former operation of a retail gasoline service station on the Property. Based on the information gathered to date, the Site appears to include petroleum‐contaminated soil and groundwater beneath the central and southern portions of the Property, and beneath a portion of the adjacent Northwest Liberty Road right‐of‐way.

The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the current soil conditions beneath the Property in areas where petroleum‐contaminated soil (PCS) had been encountered following the excavations performed in 2005 and before the remediation system that operated on the Property between 2008 and 2012 was turned off (Figure 3, Table 1). The work summarized in this report was performed in accordance with the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Cleanup Regulation, as established in WAC 173‐340, revised November 2007.

2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND

The Property includes a single irregularly shaped tax parcel (Kitsap County parcel number 1526014‐017‐2001) that covers approximately 17,250 square feet (0.42 acres) of land. The Property is listed as 19740 Viking Avenue Northwest, Poulsbo, Washington, and is located approximately 1 mile northwest of downtown Poulsbo, Washington (Figure 1).

The Property is currently occupied by Silver City Tattoo and Helter Skelter Lounge, which operate out of the 1986‐vintage convenience store building. Additional improvements on the Property include an asphalt parking lot and perimeter landscaping (Figure 2).

According to historical records, a retail gasoline station was installed at the Property between 1970 and 1975 and consisted of three underground storage tanks (USTs) with capacities ranging from 6,000 to 12,000 gallons, two double fuel‐dispensing pump islands, and four single fuel‐dispensing pump islands. A mobile home used for the retail gasoline station was located on the Property until 1977, when a modular building was constructed in its place. In 1986, the modular building was demolished and replaced with the extant convenience store building. The operation of the Property as a retail gasoline station ceased in 2005, and the UST system was removed from the Property in April 2005. TOC Holdings Co. sold the Property in August 2007 to Silver City Viking Investment, Inc.

Draft‐ Issued for Client Review

SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013

3.0 PROPERTY GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY

According to the geologic map of the region (DNR 2005), the Property and vicinity are underlain by Quaternary glacial till (unit Qgt). The Property is located above the Poulsbo Aquifer, which is positioned within the geologic unit Qgt at depths between 20 and 42 feet below ground surface (bgs; Kitsap County 1997). Soil encountered during drilling activities conducted by SoundEarth indicated that the Property is underlain by glacial till consisting of very dense, fine‐ to coarse‐grained interbedded silty sand to sand to 45 feet bgs, the maximum depth explored during previous investigations. An approximately 3‐foot‐thick, hard, gray silt unit was encountered beneath the silty sand/sand unit in several soil borings. Fill material, consisting of medium dense, fine‐ to coarse‐grained silty sand with fine to coarse gravel, is present within the former excavation areas to an approximate depth of 26 feet bgs.

Groundwater has been encountered beneath the Site at depths ranging from approximately 24 to 35 feet below the top of the monitoring well casings. The groundwater flow direction has consistently been toward the east‐southeast with a gradient ranging from 0.044 to 0.12 feet per foot.

4.0 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND INTERIM REMEDIAL ACTIONS

Subsurface investigations conducted between 2005 and 2013 by SoundEarth confirmed that the operation of the former UST system resulted in adverse environmental impacts to soil and groundwater. Laboratory analytical data indicated that concentrations of gasoline‐range petroleum hydrocarbons (GRPH); benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX); and naphthalene exceeded their respective MTCA Method A cleanup levels (cleanup levels) in soil and groundwater beneath the Site. Elevated concentrations of total lead have also been detected in groundwater samples collected from the Site; however, the concentrations of total lead are not considered to be associated with a release of petroleum hydrocarbons and are likely a result of turbidity in the groundwater samples. Naphthalene was not detected at concentrations exceeding the applicable cleanup level in any of the groundwater samples collected over the course of four or more consecutive quarters between 2009 and 2010 and was subsequently removed from the groundwater sampling and analysis plan.

In April 2005, SoundEarth oversaw the removal of the three existing USTs, two pump islands, associated product lines, and PCS from the Property. Two discrete excavations were completed in the vicinity of the USTs and pump islands. Soil was excavated to a total depth of 12 feet bgs in the UST excavation and 26 feet bgs in the pump island excavation. Soil samples collected from the final limits of the UST excavation did not contain concentrations of GRPH or BTEX exceeding cleanup levels, confirming that the PCS in the vicinity of the USTs was successfully removed. Soil samples collected from the final limits of the pump island excavation contained concentrations of GRPH, BTEX constituents, and/or naphthalene exceeding their applicable MTCA Method A cleanup levels. PCS stockpiled from the UST excavation was disposed of off‐Site at a regulated treatment facility. The pump island excavation was backfilled with stockpiled soil from the excavation.

In an effort to mitigate the residual soil and groundwater contamination at the Property, a remediation system that incorporates soil vapor extraction (SVE), groundwater circulation, and air sparge technologies was installed at the Property in 2008. The SVE component of the remediation system consists of six vacuum extraction wells (MW09, MW11, MW13, MW14, MW21, and MW22) that apply a vacuum to the vadose zone to induce air flow and enhance recovery of volatile organic contaminants from the soil. The groundwater circulation and SVE components of the remediation system are installed in



four wells (MW11, MW14, MW21, and MW22) and air sparging is performed in two wells (AS01 and AS02) in an effort to remove volatile organic contaminants and increase the dissolved oxygen content of groundwater. Elevated concentrations of GRPH and benzene were detected in the vapors extracted from the subsurface following system startup, indicating that the remediation system was successfully removing concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons from the subsurface. Acknowledging the reduction in contaminant concentrations observed throughout the Site, the remediation system was turned off on August 14, 2012, to allow for compliance groundwater monitoring.

In May 2012, a limited in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) event was conducted at the Property in an effort to reduce residual soil and groundwater contamination observed in boring/monitoring well MW20. Approximately 275 gallons of hydrogen peroxide‐activated sodium persulfate solution were injected into monitoring well MW20. The results of subsequent compliance groundwater monitoring indicated that the ISCO event effectively reduced contaminant concentrations in monitoring well MW20.

The locations of soil borings, monitoring wells, and other Property features are shown on Figure 2. Soil analytical results are summarized in Figures 3 and in Table 1. For evaluation purposes, those concentrations of chemicals of concern (COCs) that exceed the current cleanup levels for soil are presented in bold red font in the figures and tables. A detailed summary of each previous investigation and interim action and their findings and conclusions, as well as the documentation of the field work including lab reports and boring logs, are presented in the Remedial Investigation Report (SES 2009).

5.0 2013 SUPPLEMENTAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

This section describes the pre‐field and subsequent field activities conducted by SoundEarth on June 10, 11, and 12, 2013, and on November 18 and 19, 2013, to meet the objective of the SSI. The scope of work included the following:

Reviewing existing Property soil data to develop a work plan that would include details regarding the boring locations and sample intervals.

Preparing a health and safety plan in accordance with MTCA and Part 1910.120 of Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations before initiating field activities.

Performing a utility locate at the proposed boring locations using a private utility location service and by contacting the One‐Call Center for public utility location.

Overseeing the advancement of ten soil borings (B21 through B28, B30, and B31) on the Property in areas where soil contamination was identified following the UST and pump island excavations in 2005 and before the remediation system was turned off in 2012. Boring B29, which was planned to be advanced in the vicinity of boring B17/MW20, could not be drilled due to the presence of overhead power lines; boring B29 was therefore eliminated as a boring location and later replaced with boring B31.

Overseeing the installation of two additional AS remediation wells (AS03 and AS04) to treat dissolved‐phase contamination and residual soil contamination in the vicinity of boring B23.

Describing subsurface soil conditions, screening soil collected from the borings for evidence of petroleum contamination, and submitting selected soil samples for laboratory analysis.

Preparing this report.



A detailed description of the investigation activities is provided in Sections 5.1 through 5.5 below.

5.1 SOIL BORING PLACEMENT

Each soil boring advanced during the 2013 SSI was situated near locations where PCS was historically encountered. Below is a list of the historical soil sample locations and the depths where PCS exceeding MTCA Method A cleanup levels was previously encountered at the Site, as well as the 2013 SSI borings used to characterize current soil conditions in their vicinities:

Boring B21 was advanced north of the former pump islands, in the vicinity of boring B01/MW04 and excavation soil sample PIE2‐2, where PCS was encountered at depths between 18 and 20 feet bgs.

Boring B22 was advanced below the former pump islands, in the vicinity of boring B11/MW15 and excavation soil sample PIE2‐3, where PCS was encountered at depths between 15 and 30 feet bgs.

Boring B23 was advanced in the vicinity of boring B05/MW09 and excavation soil samples PIE2‐1 and PIE2‐9, where PCS was encountered at depths between 10 and 35 feet bgs.

Boring B24 was advanced in the vicinity of boring B07/MW11 and excavation soil sample PIE2‐8, where PCS was encountered at depths between 15 and 17.5 feet bgs.

Boring B25 was advanced in the vicinity of excavation soil sample PIE2‐6, where PCS was encountered at a depth of 18 feet bgs.

Boring B26 was advanced in the vicinity of boring MW02, where PCS was encountered at a depth of 35 feet bgs.

Boring B27 was advanced in the vicinity of borings AS01 and B16/MW21, where PCS was encountered at depths between 28.5 and 40 feet bgs.

Boring B28 was advanced in the vicinity of boring B10/MW14, where PCS was encountered at a depth of 27.5 feet bgs.

B29, which was planned to be advanced in the vicinity of boring B17/MW20, could not be drilled due to the presence of overhead power lines.

Boring B30 was advanced in the vicinity of borings B08/MW12 and B06/MW10, where PCS was encountered at depths between 25 and 32 feet bgs.

Boring B31 was advanced in the vicinity of boring B17/MW20, where PCS was encountered at a depth of 20 feet bgs.

5.2 DRILLING

On June 10, 11, and 12, 2013, nine soil borings (B21 through B28, and B30) were advanced on the Property using a hollow‐stem auger drill rig. Cascade Drilling, L.P. of Woodinville, Washington, performed the drilling. Locations of the June 2013 SSI borings are shown on Figure 2. On November 18 and 19, 2013, three additional soil borings (B31, AS03, and AS04) were advanced on the Property using a hollow‐stem auger drill rig. Cascade Drilling, L.P. of Woodinville, Washington, performed the drilling. Locations of the November 2013 SSI borings are shown on Figure 2. Borings AS03 and AS04 were converted to 2‐inch diameter air sparge wells to depths of 37 and 39.5 feet bgs, respectively. Both air



sparge wells were completed with approximately 1 foot of 0.010‐inch screen and will be used to augment the existing remediation system on the Property.

Soil samples were collected from the soil borings at 5‐foot sample intervals to the maximum depth explored of 45.5 feet below bgs using a split‐spoon sampler advanced through the hollow‐stem auger and a 300‐pound hammer. Additional soil samples were collected at predetermined discrete depths based on previously collected soil data. Blow counts and sample recovery were recorded at each sample interval. The soil samples were described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Soil characteristics, including moisture content, relative density, texture, and color, were recorded on the boring logs, which are provided as Appendix A. The depths at which changes in soil texture were observed and where groundwater was first encountered are also included in the boring logs. The soil borings were backfilled with bentonite and capped with concrete upon completion of drilling.

5.3 SAMPLE COLLECTION

Soil samples were screened in the field for potential evidence of contamination using visual observations, notations of odor, and by conducting headspace analysis using a photoionization detector (PID) to detect the presence of volatile organic vapors. Headspace analysis was conducted by placing soil from each sample interval into a resealable plastic bag and allowing the sample to warm for a minimum of 30 seconds. The probe of the PID was then inserted into the bag, and the highest reading obtained over an approximately 30‐second interval was recorded. The USCS symbol, visual and olfactory notations for the samples, and PID readings were recorded on boring log forms, which are provided as Appendix A.

Selected soil samples were collected from each boring and were transferred directly into laboratory‐prepared sample containers. Soil samples to be analyzed for low‐level volatile organic compounds were collected in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 5035A. Sample containers were labeled with a unique sample identification and placed in an iced cooler. The soil samples were submitted to Friedman & Bruya, Inc. of Seattle, Washington, under standard chain‐of‐custody protocols for laboratory analysis. Selected soil samples were analyzed for GRPH by Northwest Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (NWTPH) Method NWTPH‐Gx, and BTEX by EPA Method 8021B. A soil sample collected from boring B21 at 18 feet bgs was also submitted for analysis of naphthalene by EPA Method 8260C.

5.4 MANAGEMENT OF INVESTIGATIVE DERIVED WASTE

Non‐dedicated field sampling equipment was cleaned and decontaminated between uses and prior to leaving the Property. Soil cuttings and decontamination wash water were contained on the Property in labeled 55‐gallon drums pending waste profiling and proper disposal.

5.5 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Analytical results for soil samples collected during the 2013 SSI are presented on Figure 4 and in Table 1. Laboratory analytical reports are included as Appendix B. A summary of the soil analytical results from the 2013 SSI is provided below:



Soil collected from boring B23, which was advanced within the former excavation area near the former pump islands, contained a concentration of GRPH exceeding the applicable MTCA cleanup level at a depth of approximately 26 feet bgs.

Concentrations of GRPH and BTEX were not detected at concentrations exceeding their respective laboratory reporting limits and/or cleanup levels in any of the other soil samples collected from soil borings B21 through B28, B30, or B31.

6.0 DISCUSSION

GRPH and BTEX were not detected at concentrations exceeding their respective cleanup levels in soil samples collected from borings B21, B22, B24 through B28, B30, or B31, which were advanced within and southeast of the former excavation area. Concentrations of GRPH and BTEX were greatly reduced in soil samples collected from the 2013 borings when compared with the historical samples located in the same areas. These data therefore suggest that the operation of a remedial system between 2008 and 2012 effectively treated soil in these areas.

The GRPH and BTEX concentrations detected in sample B23‐26 confirms that some residual contamination remains in the native soil along the northeast area of the former excavation, at a depth of approximately 26 feet. The boring log for B23 indicates that the PCS is located within the saturated zone. Water was encountered in borings during drilling activities between depths of approximately 20 to 30 feet bgs. PCS was not encountered in any of the samples collected from above the zone of saturation or within 15 feet of the ground surface.

7.0 CONCLUSION

SoundEarth operated a remediation system on the Property between 2008 and 2012 in an effort to treat residual soil and groundwater contamination beneath the Property. The system was shut down once vapor recovery rates reached asymptotic levels and the system no longer appeared to be removing petroleum hydrocarbons from the subsurface. The current investigation involved the collection of soil from areas of the Property where PCS was previously encountered to evaluate whether the operation of the remediation system resulted in the Site being compliant with MTCA Method A cleanup criteria.

The results of the supplemental subsurface investigation demonstrate that the operation of a remedial system effectively treated soil beneath all but one area of the Property. Residual impacts encountered in boring B23 at a depth of 26 feet bgs are situated within the saturated zone and well below 15 feet bgs, the standard point of compliance for soil cleanup levels based on human exposure via direct contact. Acknowledging these findings, the soil impacts previously encountered within the upper 15.5 feet of the Property have been successfully remediated and no additional investigation or remediation of soil beneath the Property is warranted. SoundEarth will conduct additional remediation efforts, as necessary, to address residual groundwater impacts beneath the Site, and will collect confirmational groundwater samples on a quarterly basis until a minimum of four quarter of compliant results are achieved.

8.0 LIMITATIONS

The services described in this report were performed consistent with generally accepted professional consulting principles and practices. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. These services were



performed consistent with our agreement with our client. This report is solely for the use and information of our client unless otherwise noted. Any reliance on this report by a third party is at such party’s sole risk.

Opinions and recommendations contained in this report apply to conditions existing when services were performed and are intended only for the client, purposes, locations, time frames, and project parameters indicated. We are not responsible for the impacts of any changes in environmental standards, practices, or regulations subsequent to performance of services. We do not warrant the accuracy of information supplied by others, or the use of segregated portions of this report.

9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Kitsap County. 1997. Kitsap County Initial Basin Assessment. Reviewed online at <http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/oftr9704.html>. Reviewed May 29.

Sound Environmental Strategies. (SES). 2009. Remedial Investigation Report, TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01‐399, 19740 Viking Avenue Northwest, Poulsbo, Washington. March 21.

SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. (SoundEarth). 2013. Groundwater Monitoring Report, Second Quarter 2013, TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01‐399, 19740 Viking Avenue Northwest, Poulsbo, Washington. April 17.

Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). 2008. Guidelines for Property Cleanups Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program. Publication 08-09-044. July.

Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR). 2005. Kitsap County, Washington Geologic Map Units (portion of the Geology of Washington State map). Open File Report 2005‐3. December. Reviewed online at <http://www.kitsapgov.com/dcd/gis/maps/ Standard_Maps/Environmental/Quartenary_Geology_Nov2007.pdf>.

Draft – Issued for Client Review


FIGURES



TABLE

Table 1

Summary of Soil Analytical Results

TOC Holdings Co. Facility 01‐399

19740 Viking Avenue Northwest

Poulsbo, Washington

Draft ‐ Issued for Client Review

GRPH(1) DRPH(2) ORPH(2) Benzene(3) Toluene(3) Ethylbenzene(3)Total

Xylenes(3) MTBE(4) EDB(4) EDC(4) Naphthalene(4)Total

Lead(5)

SP‐1 04/20/05 ‐‐ <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

SP‐2 04/20/05 ‐‐ <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

SP‐3 04/20/05 ‐‐ <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

Stockpile #2 SP‐4 04/20/05 ‐‐ 6 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 0.14 0.08 0.84 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

Stockpile #3 SP‐5 04/20/05 ‐‐ 510 110x ‐‐ 0.02 6.4 7.8 66 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

T‐1 04/20/05 12 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

T‐2 04/20/05 11 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

T‐3 04/20/05 11 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

T‐4 04/20/05 12 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

T‐5 04/20/05 11 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

T‐6 04/20/05 12 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

T‐7 04/20/05 11 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

PI‐1 04/20/05 5 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

PI‐2 04/20/05 5 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

PL‐1 04/20/05 5 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

PIE2‐1 04/22/05 18 130 <50 ‐‐ 0.18 2.0 1.2 8.9 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 2.3 2

PIE2‐2 04/22/05 18 4,600 430x ‐‐ 34 230 74 490 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 15 <2

PIE2‐3 04/22/05 15 150 140x ‐‐ 0.26 6.6 2.5 19 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 3.3 <2

PIE2‐4 04/22/05 18 <2 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 0.06 <0.02 0.07 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

PIE2‐5 04/22/05 15 16 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 0.14 0.14 0.95 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

PIE2‐6 04/22/05 18 2 <50 ‐‐ 0.08 0.22 0.05 0.23 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <2

PIE2‐7 04/22/05 15 <2 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

PIE2‐8 04/22/05 15 3,500 480x ‐‐ 14 50 79 420 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 7.4 <2

PIE2‐9 04/22/05 26 1,600 250x ‐‐ 5.7 110 36 190 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 2.4 <2

MW01 MW‐1‐30 11/08/05 30 <4.88 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0319 <0.0531 <0.0531 <0.106 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.00

MW‐2‐19 19 <5.89 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0346 <0.0577 <0.0577 <0.115 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.15

MW‐2‐35 35 <3.86 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.103 0.132 0.106 0.588 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.16

MW‐3‐30 30 <5.68 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0312 <0.0520 <0.0520 <0.104 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.18

MW‐3‐40 40 <5.49 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0619 <0.103 <0.103 <0.206 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.988

B‐1‐20 20 11.8 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.10 1.40 0.327 1.90 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.59

B‐1‐21 21 <5.90 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0337 <0.0562 <0.0562 <0.112 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.67

B‐1‐30.5 30.5 <4.93 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0349 <0.0582 <0.0582 <0.116 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.47

MW‐5‐15 15 <5.42 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0303 <0.0504 <0.0504 <0.101 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.95

MW‐5‐30 30 <4.84 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0316 <0.0527 <0.0527 <0.105 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.27

B02‐27 27 <4.51 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.27 <0.46 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.18

B02‐32 32 <4.39 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.33

B02‐40 40 <4.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.07 <0.07 <0.22 <0.36 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 0.935

B03‐25 25 <4.29 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.10 <0.10 <0.29 <0.49 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.15

B03‐33 33 <3.80 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.28 <0.47 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.21

B03‐40 40 <4.25 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.28 <0.47 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 0.980

B04‐25 25 <4.54 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.27 <0.45 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.55

B04‐35 35 <4.65 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 2.13

B04‐40 40 <3.81 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.07 <0.07 <0.21 <0.36 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.40

B05‐10 10 3,510 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.68 49 38 310 <4.3 <0.43 <0.43 ‐‐ 1.55

B05‐25 25 976 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.48 8.3 3.9 27 <0.44 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.08

B05‐35 35 13.9 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.07 0.47 0.17 1.0 <0.40 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.34

B06‐25 25 12.3 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.37 0.84 0.10 0.61 <0.46 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.22

B06‐32 32 1,110 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.0 5.7 16 92 <0.89 <0.09 <0.09 ‐‐ 1.40

B06‐40 40 <4.72 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.10 <0.10 <0.29 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.52

B‐07‐17.5 17.5 862 <10.7 <26.8 0.23 20 17 100 <0.46 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.15

B‐07‐28 28 <4.38 <11.8 <29.4 0.03 <0.09 <0.09 <0.26 <0.44 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.28

B‐07‐42.5 42.5 <4.05 <11.5 <28.8 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.24 <0.41 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 3.27

B‐08‐22.5 22.5 <3.88 <10.9 <27.3 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.23 <0.39 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.34

B‐08‐27 27 <4.34 <11.6 <28.9 0.08 <0.09 <0.09 <0.26 <0.43 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.19

B‐08‐36 36 <4.19 <11.9 <29.8 0.03 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.05

B‐09‐25 25 <4.49 <11.3 <28.3 <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.27 <0.45 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.35

B‐09‐35 35 <4.75 <12.0 <29.9 <0.02 <0.10 <0.10 <0.29 <0.48 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.00

B‐09‐40 40 <4.54 <12.4 <30.9 <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.27 <0.45 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 0.922

B‐10‐20 20 5.21 <11.2 <28.1 <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.26 <0.44 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.47

B‐10‐27.5 27.5 10.8 <11.8 <29.4 0.17 0.10 0.35 2.5 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.41

B‐10‐40 40 <4.15 <10.9 <27.2 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 2.43

30/100(7) 2,000 2,000 0.03 7 6 9 0.1 0.005 NE 5 250

Analytical Results (mg/kg)

B07/MW11

B08/MW12

B09/MW13

B10/MW14

Stockpile #1

Pump Islands/

Product Lines

Sample

Depth

(bgs)

Sample

Date

Sample

Identification

Sample

Location

B06/MW10

UST Excavation

11/07/05

MW02

MW03

B01/MW04

Pump Island

Excavation

MW05

B02/MW06

B03/MW07

11/07/05

11/07/05

03/13/06

11/08/05

09/25/06

09/25/06

03/13/06

MTCA Method A Cleanup Level for Soil(6)

03/13/06

03/14/06

03/14/06

B04/MW08

B05/MW09

09/26/06

09/26/06

P:\0440 TOC Holdings Co\01‐399 Poulsbo\Technical\Tables\2013\SSI\01‐399_2013SSI_SD_DFCR.xlsx 1 of 3

Table 1




Poulsbo, Washington




Lead(5)

Analytical Results (mg/kg)Sample

Depth

(bgs)

Sample

Date

Sample

Identification

Sample

Location

B‐11‐20 20 <3.98 <11.3 <28.3 0.14 0.16 <0.08 0.28 <0.40 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.41

B‐11‐30 30 528E <11.2 <28.1 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 0.949

B‐11‐37.5 37.5 <3.82 <10.5 <26.3 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.23 <0.38 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.92

B‐12‐25 25 <4.58 <11.9 <29.8 <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.27 <0.46 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.06

B‐12‐32.5 32.5 <4.24 <11.0 <27.5 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.22

B‐12‐40 40 <4.06 <12.0 <30.1 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.24 <0.41 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 0.922

B‐13‐25 25 <3.81 <10.9 <27.3 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.23 <0.38 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 0.988

B‐13‐30 30 <4.02 <12.1 <30.3 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.24 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 0.916

B‐13‐40 40 <3.84 <12.0 <30.1 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.23 <0.38 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.90

B‐14‐35 35 <4.26 <11.0 <27.5 <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.26 <0.43 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ ‐‐

B‐14‐40 40 <4.22 <11.4 <28.6 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.93

B‐14‐45 45 <3.72 <11.6 <29.0 <0.01 <0.07 <0.07 <0.22 <0.37 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.21

B15‐20 20 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B15‐25 25 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B15‐30 30 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B16‐30 30 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B16‐35 35 16 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.70 1.1 0.30 1.7 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B16‐40 40 5 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.17 0.23 0.06 0.37 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B17‐15 15 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B17‐20 20 930 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.4 2.5 3.1 17 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B17‐25 25 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B18‐20 20 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B18‐25 25 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B18‐30 30 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

SP01 SP‐20080826 08/26/08 ‐‐ <2 <50 <250 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B19‐23.5 23.5 <2 <11.0 <27.6 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B19‐28.5 28.5 120 <11.2 <28.0 <0.02 0.076 <0.28 1.2 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B20‐28.5 28.5 <2 19.8 <27.0 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B20‐33 33 <2 32.7 <26.5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B21‐10 10 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B21‐18 18 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.05 ‐‐

B21‐20 20 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B22‐10 10 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B22‐15 15 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B22‐20 20 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B22‐30 30 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B23‐10 10 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B23‐18 18 5.6 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.21 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B23‐26 26 5,000 ‐‐ ‐‐ <1 9.5 11 44 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B23‐35 35 3.1 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B24‐15 15 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B24‐17.5 17.5 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B25 B25‐18 06/10/13 18 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B26 B26‐35 06/10/13 35 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

30/100(7) 2,000 2,000 0.03 7 6 9 0.1 0.005 NE 5 250

B13/MW17

B14/MW18

09/27/06

B11/MW15

B12/MW16

B16/MW21

09/26/06

09/27/06

07/25/07

07/25/07

09/27/06

B15/MW22

07/26/07

B18/MW19

B17/MW20

07/26/07

B19/AS01 11/18/10


06/11/13B21

B20/AS02 11/18/10

B24 06/11/13

B22

B23

06/11/13

06/11/13


Table 1




Poulsbo, Washington




Lead(5)

Analytical Results (mg/kg)Sample

Depth

(bgs)

Sample

Date

Sample

Identification

Sample

Location

B27‐28.5 28.5 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B27‐35 35 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B27‐40 40 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B28 B‐28‐27.5 06/12/13 27.5 2.6 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B30‐25 25 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B30‐27 27 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B30‐32 32 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B31‐20 20 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

B31‐22.5 22.5 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐

30/100(7) 2,000 2,000 0.03 7 6 9 0.1 0.005 NE 5 250

NOTES:

Red denotes concentration exceeds MTCA Method A cleanup level. ‐‐ = not analyzed or not measured

< = not detected at a concentration exceeding laboratory reporting limits

bgs = below ground surface

Samples analyzed after September 2006 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. of Seattle, Washington. DRPH = diesel‐range petroleum hydrocarbons(1)Anayzed by Method NWTPH‐Gx. EDB = ethylene dibromide (1,2‐dibromoethane)(2)Anayzed by Method NWTPH‐Dx. EDC = ethylene dichloride (1,2‐dichloroethane)(3)Anayzed by EPA Method 8021, 8012B, or 8260B. EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(4)Analyzed by EPA Method 8260 or 8260C. GRPH = gasoline‐range petroleum hydrocarbons (5)Analyzed by EPA Method 6020. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram

MTBE = methyl tertiary‐butyl ether

MTCA = Washington State Model Toxics Control Act(7)30 mg/kg when benzene is present and 100 mg/kg when benzene is not present. NE = not established

Laboratory Notes: NWTPH = northwest total petroleum hydrocarbonEEstimated value. The reported value exceeds the calibration range of the analysis. ORPH = oil‐range petroleum hydrocarbonsxThe pattern of peaks present is not indicative of diesel. The result is due to overlap from the gasoline range. UST = underground storage tank

B30

06/10/13

06/10/13

(6)MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels, Table 740‐1 of Section 900 of Chapter 173‐340 of the

Washington Administrative Code, revised November 2007.

Samples analyzed in November 2005 through September 2006 by TestAmerica Laboratories,

Inc. (formerly North Creek Analytical) of Bothell, Washington.

B27


B31 11/18/13




APPENDIX A

BORING LOGS

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING

ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)

feet bgs

Water Depth After Completion:

Water Depth At Time of Drilling:

Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches

feet bgsWell Screened Interval:

Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:

Drilling Co./Driller:

Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

1 of 2

Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:

0

5

10

15

--

--

Poulsbo, Washington

21

6/11/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/11/2013

EBF

TOC Facility No. 01-399

0440-038

19740 Viking Avenue

B21

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

21.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM

SM

0.0

0.0

13

10

10

10

11

12

75

80Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND with graveland finer sand, brown-gray, no hydrocarbonodor (20-70-10).

Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND withgravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).

Asphalt.

B21-05

B21-10

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

2 of 2


15

20

25

30

--

--

Poulsbo, Washington

21

6/11/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/11/2013

EBF


0440-038

19740 Viking Avenue

B21

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

21.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM

SM

SM-ML

ML

32.5

13.9

4.6

50/6

50/6

50/6

300

200

200

Boring terminated at 21.5 feet below groundsurface and backfilled with bentonite.

Moist, water on sample, fine sandy SILT, brown-gray, faint hydrocarbon odor (65-35-0).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND to sandy SILT,hydrocarbon odor (40-60-0).

Moist, very dense, silty fine to medium SAND,brown-gray, hydrocarbon odor (20-80-0).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, gray-brown, hydrocarbon odor present(15-80-5).

B21-18

B21-20

B21-21

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

1 of 3


0

5

10

15

--

--

Poulsbo, Washington

30

6/11/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/11/2013

CMP/EBF


0440-038

19740 Viking Avenue NW

B22

18.5 feet south of SW building corner

66 feet west of SW building corner

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

38

300

D+M

HSA

--

Asphalt

SM

SM

0.0

0.0

12

15

20

14

18

19

75

100Moist, dense, silty fine SAND with trace gravel,brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).

Moist, dense, silty fine SAND with trace gravel,brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (15-80-5).

Asphalt.

B22-05

B22-10

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

2 of 3


15

20

25

30

--

--

Poulsbo, Washington

30

6/11/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/11/2013

CMP/EBF


0440-038


B22



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

38

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM

SM

SM-SP

0.0

0.0

0.0

50/6

50/6

50/6

150

125

150Moist, very dense, fine to coarse SAND, brown,no hydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND, gray-brown,no hydrocarbon odor (35-65-0).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND wtih tracegravel, brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).

B22-15

B22-20

--

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

3 of 3


30

35

40

45

--

--

Poulsbo, Washington

30

6/11/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/11/2013

CMP/EBF


0440-038


B22



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

38

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM

SM-ML

0.0

0.0

50/6

50/6

150

125

Boring terminated at 38 feet below groundsurface and backfilled with bentonite.

Wet, very dense, well consolidated, silty fineSAND to sandy SILT with gravel, gray, fainthydrocarbon odor (40-50-10). Sand-rich lenspresent.

Strong hydrocarbon odor in cuttings. PID: 83ppm.

Wet, very dense, silty fine SAND, brown, nohydrocarbon odor (25-75-0).

B22-30

B22-37.5

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

1 of 4


0

5

10

15

--

--

Poulsbo, Washington

26

6/11/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/11/13

EBF


0440-038


B23

10 feet south of SW building corner


--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

45.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

Asphalt

SM

SM

0.0

0.0

8

10

12

10

10

9

50

90Moist, medium dense, silty fine to medium SANDwith gravel, brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor(25-60-15).

Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND withgravel, brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-65-15).

Asphalt.

B23-05

B23-10

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

2 of 4


15

20

25

30

--

--

Poulsbo, Washington

26

6/11/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/11/13

EBF


0440-038


B23



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

45.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM

SM

SM-SP

32

945

58.1

50/5

50/6

50/6

32

200

200Moist to wet, very dense, fine SAND with somesilt, moderate hydrocarbon odor (10-90-0).

Moist to wet, very dense, silty fine SAND tosandy SILT, gray, strong hydrocarbon odor (40-60-0).

Moist, very dense, silty SAND with some gravel,brown, faint hydrocarbon odor. Large gravelstuck at bottom of sample.

B23-18

B23-25

B23-26

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

3 of 4


30

35

40

45

--

--

Poulsbo, Washington

26

6/11/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/11/13

EBF


0440-038


B23



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

45.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM-SP

SM-SP

69.7

9.3

50/6

50/6

300

300Wet, very dense, fine to medium SAND with silt,gray, faint hydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).

Wet, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with somesilt, brown-gray, possible faint hydrocarbon odor(10-90-0). Small lenses of silty sand present.

B23-35

B23-40

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

4 of 4


45

50

55

60

--

--

Poulsbo, Washington

26

6/11/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/11/13

EBF


0440-038


B23



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

45.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM-SP6.9 (slough)50/6 85


Wet, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with somesilt, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (10-90-0).

B23-45

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

1 of 2


0

5

10

15

--

--

Poulsbo, Washington

--

6/11/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/11/2013

EBF


0440-038


B24


50.25 feet west of SW building corner

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

28.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

Asphalt

SM

SM

0.0

0.0

7

10

14

50/6

75

50

Asphalt.

Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-75-5).

B24-05

--

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

2 of 2


15

20

25

30

--

--

Poulsbo, Washington

--

6/11/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/11/2013

EBF


0440-038


B24



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

28.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM

SM

SM

SM-ML

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.6

50/6

50/6

50/6

50/6

100

125

150

200

Moist, very dense, silty fine to coarse SAND withgravel, several large gravels present, brown, nohydrocarbon odor (20-65-15).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with gravel,brown-gray, some orange discoloration, nohydrocarbon odor (25-60-15).

Moist, very dense, well consolidated, silty fineSAND with some gravel, brown-gray, nohydrocarbon odor (35-55-10).

Moist, very dense, well consolidated, silty fineSAND to sandy SILT, gray, faint hydrocarbonodor (45-55-0).

Boring terminated at 28.5 feet below groundsurface and back filled with bentonite.

B24-15

B24-17.5

--

B24-28

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

1 of 3


0

5

10

15

--

Poulsbo, Washington

27.5

6/10/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/10/2013

EBF


0440-038


B25



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

35.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

Asphalt

SM

SM

0.0

0.0

8

8

8

50/6

65

125

Asphalt.

Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-75-5).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).

B25-10

--

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

2 of 3


15

20

25

30

--

Poulsbo, Washington

27.5

6/10/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/10/2013

EBF


0440-038


B25



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

35.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM

SM

SM

SM

0.0

0.0

0.0

3.3

32.0 (slough)

50/6

50/6

50/6

50/6

200

150

125

200

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with gravel,brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-65-15). Sandbecomes more coarse with depth.

Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with siltand gravel, brown, faint hydrocarbon odor (15-70-15).

Slough is gray, silty SAND, strong hydrocarbonodor.Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with siltand gravel, brown, faint hydrocarbon odor (15-70-15).

Wet, very dense, fine SAND with silt, gray,moderate hydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).

B25-18

B25-20

B25-25

B25-27.5

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

3 of 3


30

35

40

45

--

Poulsbo, Washington

27.5

6/10/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/10/2013

EBF


0440-038


B25



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

35.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM

SM-ML

32.5

0.0

50/6

50/6

150

300

Wet, very dense, fine SAND with silt, gray, fainthydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).

Moist, very dense, very well consolidated, siltyfine SAND to sandy SILT with trace gravel, gray,no hydrocarbon odor (45-50-5).


B25-30

B25-35

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

1 of 3


0

5

10

15

--

Poulsbo, Washington

30

6/10/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/10/2013

EBF


0440-038


B26



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

40.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

Asphalt

SM

SM

2.0

2.0

14

22

30

14

17

18

100

100

Asphalt.

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (30-60-10).

Moist, dense, silty fine SAND with some gravel,gray, no hydrocarbon odor (30-60-10).

--

--

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

2 of 3


15

20

25

30

--

Poulsbo, Washington

30

6/10/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/10/2013

EBF


0440-038


B26



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

40.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM

SM-SP

SM

SP

2.0

0.0

0.0

15

50/6

50/6

17

17

20

150

100

100

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (30-60-10).Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, gray-brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, gray-brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).

Moist, dense, fine to medium SAND with trace siltand gravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (5-90-5).

--

B26-19

--

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

3 of 3


30

35

40

45

--

Poulsbo, Washington

30

6/10/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/10/2013

EBF


0440-038


B26



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

40.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM

SP

SPSM-SP

0.0

0.0

0.0

50/6

21

50/6

50/6

125

150

--

Wet, very dense, silty fine SAND, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (20-80-0).

Moist to wet, very dense, fine to medium SANDwith trace silt, trace gravel, and some coarsesand, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (5-90-5).

Wet, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with tracesilt and gravel, no hydrocarbon odor (5-90-5).Increasing silt towards bottom of sample (15-85-0).


--

B26-35

B26-40

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

1 of 3


0

5

10

15

--

Poulsbo, Washington

33

6/10/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/10/2013

EBF


0440-038


B27



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

43.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

Asphalt

SM

SM

1.0

1.0

14

27

28

50/6

100

90

Asphalt.

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).Transition to coarser sand at 5.5 feet bgs.

Moist, very dense, silty, gravelly fine SAND, gray,no hydrocarbon odor (30-50-20).

--

--

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

2 of 3


15

20

25

30

--

Poulsbo, Washington

33

6/10/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/10/2013

EBF


0440-038


B27



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

43.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM

SP

SP-SM

MLSM

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50/6

50/6

50/6

50/6

125

100

200

200

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with gravel,gray, no hydrocarbon odor (35-50-15).

Moist, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with tracesilt and gravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (5-90-5).

Moist, very dense, fine SAND with some silt, grayno hydrocarbon odor (10-90-0).

Moist to wet, very dense, stiff, sandy SILT, gray,no hydrocarbon odor (75-25-0).Moist to wet, silty fine to coarse SAND, nohydrocarbon odor (35-65-0).

--

--

B27-23.5

B27-28.5

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

3 of 3


30

35

40

45

--

Poulsbo, Washington

33

6/10/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/10/2013

EBF


0440-038


B27



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

43.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

ML

SP

SP

SP

0.0

48.3

7.8

0.0

50/6

50/6

50/6

17

50/6

175

300

200

150

Moist, very hard, fine sandy SILT, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (80-20-0).

Wet, very dense, medium to coarse SAND withtrace silt, gray, moderate hydrocarbon odor (5-95-0).

Wet, very dense, medium to coarse SAND withtrace silt, gray, faint hydrocarbon odor (5-95-0).

Wet, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with tracegravel and silt, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (5-90-5).


B27-30

B27-35

B27-40

B27-42.5

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

1 of 3


0

5

10

15

--

Poulsbo, Washington

33

6/12/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/12/2013

EBF


0440-038


B28



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

23

300

D+M

HSA

--

Asphalt

SM

SM

0.0

0.0

3

3

5

8

9

13

75

90

Asphalt.

Moist, loose, silty fine SAND with trace gravel,brown, no hydrocarbon odor (25-70-5).

Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (25-70-5).

--

--

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

2 of 3


15

20

25

30

--

Poulsbo, Washington

33

6/12/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/12/2013

EBF


0440-038


B28



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

23

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM

SP-SM

SP

SM-ML

0.0

0.0

17.4

23

50/6

50/6

17

50/6

50/6

200

200

150

200

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (30-60-10).

Moist, very dense, silty, fine to medium SANDwith trace gravel, brown-gray, no hydrocarbonodor (15-80-5).

Moist, very dense, fine to coarse SAND withsome silt, brown-gray, possible fainthydrocarbon odor (10-90-0).

Moist to wet, very dense, silty fine SAND tosandy SILT, gray, moderate hydrocarbon odor(45-55-0).

--

B28-20

--

B28-27.5

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

3 of 3


30

35

40

45

--

Poulsbo, Washington

33

6/12/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/12/2013

EBF


0440-038


B28



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

23

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM-ML

SP-SM

SM

SM-ML

16.6

37.4

6.2

0.0

50/6

50/6

50/6

50/6

200

200

300

--

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND to sandy SILTwith trace gravel, gray, strong hydrocarbon odor(45-50-5).

Driller reports water between 30 and 35 feet bgs.

Wet, very dense, fine to medium SAND with somesilt, gray, moderate hydrocarbon odor (10-90-0).

Wet, very dense, fine to medium SAND with silt,brown-gray, faint hydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).

Moist, very dense, well consolidated, silty fineSAND to sandy SILT with some gravel, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (40-50-10).

Boring terminated at 43 feet below groundsurface and backfilled with bentonite.

--

--

B28-40

B28-42.5

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

1 of 3


0

5

10

15

--

Poulsbo, Washington

32

6/10/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/10/2013

EBF


0440-038


B30



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

40.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

Asphalt

SM

SM

0.0

1.0

17

27

21

50/6

100

25

Asphalt.

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-75-5).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).

--

--

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

2 of 3


15

20

25

30

--

Poulsbo, Washington

32

6/10/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/10/2013

EBF


0440-038


B30



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

40.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SM-SP

SM-ML

SM

SP

SMML

1.0

1.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50/6

50/6

50/6

50/6

50/6

100

120

175

200

175

Moist, very dense, fine to medium SANDcoarsening with depth with some silt and gravel,gray, no hydrocarbon odor (10-80-10).

Moist, very dense to very hard, silty fine SAND tosandy SILT with trace gravel, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (45-50-5).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).

Moist, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with tracesilt, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (5-95-0).

Moist, very dense, fine SAND with silt, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).In shoe: moist, very hard, sandy SILT, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (55-45-0).

--

--

B30-22.5

B30-25

B20-27

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

3 of 3


30

35

40

45

--

Poulsbo, Washington

32

6/10/2013

RKB

Asphalt

6/10/2013

EBF


0440-038


B30



--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Cascade / Dave

40.5

300

D+M

HSA

--

SP

SP

SP

14.6

3.3

0.0

50/6

50/6

50/6

300

300

300

Wet, very dense, medium to coarse SAND withtrace silt, gray, moderate hydrocarbon odor (5-95-0).

Wet, very dense, medium to coarse SAND withtrace silt, gray, faint hydrocarbon odor (5-95-0).

Wet, very dense, medium to coarse SAND withtrace silt and trace gravel, gray, no hydrocarbonodor (5-90-5).


B30-32

B30-36

B30-40

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING

Site Address:


feet bgs

Water DepthAfter Completion

Time of DrillingWater Depth At

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:


1 of 2Page:

0

5

10

15

--

B31

Poulsbo, Washington

19740 Viking AVenue NW

11/18/13

RKB

Asphalt

11/18/13

EBF

TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01-399

0440-038



--

--

--

--

----

Cascade/Curtis

25.5

140

Split-spoon

Limited-access HSA

--

--

--

Asphalt at surface

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, brown, faint hydrocarbon odor (15, 80, 5).

Moist, very dense, silty fine to medium SANDwith trace fine gravel, brown, no hydrocarbonodor (15, 80, 5).

4.5

1.7

100

125

2450/6

4150/6

SM

SM

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING

Site Address:


feet bgs



lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:


2 of 2Page:

15

20

25

30

--

B31

Poulsbo, Washington

19740 Viking AVenue NW

11/18/13

RKB

Asphalt

11/18/13

EBF


0440-038



--

--

--

--

----

Cascade/Curtis

25.5

140

Split-spoon

Limited-access HSA

--

--

--

Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with siltand trace gravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor(10, 85, 5).

Wet, very dense, silty fine SAND to sandy SILT,gray, hydrocarbon odor (45, 55, 0).

Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with siltand trace gravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor(10, 85, 5).

Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with silt,brown, no hydrocarbon odor (10, 90, 0).

End of boring at 25.5 feet bgs. Backfill withbentonite.

B31-15

B31-20

B31-22.5

B31-25

0.5

10.9

1.1

0.0

125

100

125

100

50/6

50/6

50/6

50/6

SP

SM-ML

SP

SP

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

1 of 3


0

5

10

15

--

Poulsbo, Washington

35

11/19/13

RKB

Asphalt

11/19/13

EBF

TOC 01-399

0440-038


AS03



37

36 to 37

0.010

2/12 Sand

Concrete

Buried

Bentonite and Grout

BIC 957

Cascade/Curtis

38.5

300

Split-spoon

HSA

2"/8.25

SM

SM

0.0

0.0

50/6

122024

200

75

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (15, 80, 5).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with gravel,brown, no hydrocarbon odor (15, 75, 10).

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

2 of 3


15

20

25

30

--

Poulsbo, Washington

35

11/19/13

RKB

Asphalt

11/19/13

EBF

TOC 01-399

0440-038


AS03



37

36 to 37

0.010

2/12 Sand

Concrete

Buried

Bentonite and Grout

BIC 957

Cascade/Curtis

38.5

300

Split-spoon

HSA

2"/8.25

SM

SP

SM-ML

SP

SP

0.0

0.0

0.0

2850/6

2750/6

3250/6

110

100

125

As previous

Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND withgravel and silt, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (5,85, 10).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND to sandy SILT,brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (50, 50, 0).

Moist, fine SAND with silt and trace gravel,brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (10, 85, 5).

Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with silt,brown, no hydrocarbon odor (5, 95, 0).

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING


feet bgs



Site Address:

lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:

Page:

3 of 3


30

35

40

45

--

Poulsbo, Washington

35

11/19/13

RKB

Asphalt

11/19/13

EBF

TOC 01-399

0440-038


AS03



37

36 to 37

0.010

2/12 Sand

Concrete

Buried

Bentonite and Grout

BIC 957

Cascade/Curtis

38.5

300

Split-spoon

HSA

2"/8.25

SM

SP

SP

ML

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50/6

1950/6

50/6

50/6

125

130

200

125

Moist, very dense, sandy SILT to silty SAND,gray, no hydrocarbon odor (45, 55, 0).

Wet, very dense, fine to medium SAND with silt,gray, no hydrocarbon odor (5, 95, 0).

Wet, as previous, increasing silt in shoe ofsampler (10, 90, 0).

Driller reports hard drilling at 37 feet bgs.

Moist, hard, consolidated, sandy SILT, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (60, 40, 0).

End of boring at 38.5 feet bgs. Install air spargewell.

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING

Site Address:


feet bgs



lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:


1 of 3Page:

0

5

10

15

--

AS04

Poulsbo, Washington


11/19/13

RKB

Asphalt

11/19/13

EBF


0440-038



39.5

38.5 to 39.5

0.010

2/12 Sand

BuriedBIC 958

Cascade/Curtis

40.5

300

Split-spoon

HSA

2/8.25"

Notes

Bentonite/Grout

Concrete

Moist, medium dense, silty gravelly fine SAND,brown, faint hydrocarbon odor (15, 75, 10).

Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20, 75, 5).

14.7

0.0

100

100

9910

101412

SM

SM

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING

Site Address:


feet bgs



lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:


2 of 3Page:

15

20

25

30

--

AS04

Poulsbo, Washington


11/19/13

RKB

Asphalt

11/19/13

EBF


0440-038



39.5

38.5 to 39.5

0.010

2/12 Sand

BuriedBIC 958

Cascade/Curtis

40.5

300

Split-spoon

HSA

2/8.25"

Notes

Bentonite/Grout

Concrete

Similar to previous, silty fine SAND with gravel,no hydrocarbon odor (20, 70, 10).

Moist, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with siltand trace gravel, brown faint hydrocarbon odor(10, 85, 5).

Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND to sandy SILT,blue gray, very strong hydrocarbon odor (45, 55,0).

Moist, fine to medium SAND with silt, brown,moderate hydrocarbon odor (10, 90, 0).

Moist to wet, silty fine SAND, blue gray, fainthydrocarbon odor (45, 55, 0).

Moist to wet, as previous, very stronghydrocarbon odor (45, 55, 0).

Moist to wet, silty fine SAND, blue-gray,hydrocarbon odor (35, 65, 0).

AS04-22.5

AS04-25.5

AS04-27.5

0.0

2.7

116

14.2

503

130

100

80

110

125

2450/6

50/6

2450/6

50/6

2250/6

SM

SW

SM-ML

SP

SM-ML

SM-ML

SM

Date Completed:

USCS

feet bgs%

Re

co

ve

ry

Blo

w C

ount

Project:

Project Number:

Logged by:

Date Started:

Surface Conditions:

Well Location N/S:

Well Location E/W:

Reviewed by:

Depth Well

DetailGra

phic

ClassSample

ID

Inte

rval

(fee

t bgs

)LOG

BORING

Site Address:


feet bgs



lbs

feet bgs

feet bgs

inches

inches


Screen Slot Size:

Filter Pack Used:

Surface Seal:

Annular Seal:

Monument Type:

Drilling Equipment:


Sampler Type:

Hammer Type/Weight:

Total Boring Depth:

Total Well Depth:

State Well ID No.:


3 of 3Page:

30

35

40

45

--

AS04

Poulsbo, Washington


11/19/13

RKB

Asphalt

11/19/13

EBF


0440-038



39.5

38.5 to 39.5

0.010

2/12 Sand

BuriedBIC 958

Cascade/Curtis

40.5

300

Split-spoon

HSA

2/8.25"

Notes

Bentonite/Grout

Concrete

Wet, very dense, silty fine SAND, gray,hydrocarbon odor (15, 85, 0).

Wet, medium dense, fine to medium SAND withsilt, gray, hydrocarbon odor (10, 90, 0).

Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with siltand trace gravel, gray, faint hydrocarbon odor(10, 85, 5).

Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND withgravel and silt, increasing gravel with depth,gray-brown, faint hydrocarbon odor (10, 80, 10).

Wet, very dense, fine to medium SAND with siltand gravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (15, 75,10).

Upper sample as previous. Bottom of samplevery dense, consolidated, sandy gravelly SILT tosilty SAND, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (40, 50,10).Moist, hard, fine sandy SILT with trace gravel,consolidated, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (60, 35,5).

End of boring at 40.5 feet bgs. Install air spargewell.

AS04-37

156

91.4

15.2

2.2

2.7

0.7

0.0

80

100

100

100

150

300

2050/6

121516

162324

153750/6

50/6

50/6

50/6

SM

SP

SP

SP

SP

SPSM-ML

ML



APPENDIX B

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS



Friedman and Bruya, Inc. #306184

FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS

James E. Bruya, Ph.D. 3012 16th Avenue West Yelena Aravkina, M.S. Seattle, WA 98119-2029 Michael Erdahl, B.S. (206) 285-8282 Kurt Johnson, B.S. [email protected] Eric Young, B.S. www.friedmanandbruya.com

June 18, 2013 Ryan Bixby, Project Manager SoundEarth Strategies 2811 Fairview Ave. East, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98102 Dear Mr. Bixby: Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on June 12, 2013 from the TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306184 project. There are 4 pages included in this report. Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for disposal in 30 days. If you would like us to return your samples or arrange for long term storage at our offices, please contact us as soon as possible. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you should have any questions. Sincerely, FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.

Michael Erdahl Project Manager Enclosures c: Audrey Hackett, Beau Johnson SOU0618R.DOC



1

CASE NARRATIVE This case narrative encompasses samples received on June 12, 2013 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the SoundEarth Strategies TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306184 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID’s listed below. Laboratory ID SoundEarth Strategies 306184-01 B28-20 306184-02 B28-27.5 306184-03 B28-40 306184-04 B28-42.5 All quality control requirements were acceptable.



2

Date of Report: 06/18/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306184 Date Extracted: 06/13/13 Date Analyzed: 06/13/13

RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,

XYLENES AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING METHODS 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx

Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)

Ethyl Total Gasoline Surrogate Sample ID Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Range (% Recovery) Laboratory ID (Limit 50-150) B28-27.5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 2.6 94 306184-02

Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 87 03-1097 MB



3

Date of Report: 06/18/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306184

QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,

XYLENES, AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING EPA METHOD 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx

Laboratory Code: 306186-02 (Duplicate) Analyte

Reporting

Units

Sample Result

(Wet Wt)

Duplicate Result

(Wet Wt)

RPD

(Limit 20) Benzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Toluene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) <0.06 <0.06 nm Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) <2 <2 nm Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Analyte

Reporting

Units

Spike Level

Percent Recovery

LCS

Acceptance

Criteria Benzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 90 66-121 Toluene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 89 72-128 Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 91 69-132 Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) 1.5 93 69-131 Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) 20 95 61-153



4

Data Qualifiers & Definitions a - The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.

A1 – More than one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probability.

b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix spike recoveries may not be meaningful.

ca - The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an estimate.

c - The presence of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.

d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits may be raised due to dilution.

ds - The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may not be meaningful.

dv - Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised accordingly.

fb - Analyte present in the blank and the sample.

fc – The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant.

hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity.

ht - Analysis performed outside the method or client-specified holding time requirement.

ip - Recovery fell outside of normal control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the quantitation of the analyte.

j – The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate.

J - The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration is an estimate.

jl - The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.

jr - The rpd result in laboratory control sample associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.

js - The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.

lc - The presence of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination.

L - The reported concentration was generated from a library search.

nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the RPD is not applicable.

pc – The sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should be considered an estimate.

pr – The sample was received with incorrect preservation. The value reported should be considered an estimate.

ve - Estimated concentration calculated for an analyte response above the valid instrument calibration range. A dilution is required to obtain an accurate quantification of the analyte.

vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte.

x - The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation.

u, o n o D --t

e *g

ao

Ed

ea

dl

f;

lu

lt

tr

ll

l-

la

lrn

l-

' 1

9to

to

t\

ts

F'

tdId

|e|q

l|

>l

fl

l<

lq

I ts

tdt

tE

tt

to

ft

l6

||

lt

tl

tt

l|

|l

tt

l

1l J l o IN lo t9 lq)

lo lo.

ll

l.O to lo I I I I I 'Tl o x +

a/, 3 '! F m o - z o 1t o G v, -l o 0 \ Dt

\ o.,

I

(t') ( G

v) )".

CO \ .\ t. 1

t-)

(p c

Y"

Y c{) : f, -lJ i1

6t 'iJ f,q'

\, ir"

v, o 3 p. o E

IIFi

I I

ftt i \'.,

ic0

Fg

Q5 fE

II{ \.'

\

r(.

"$ ra

, I

f.t a.

sgI

f r> Jr

t*l \a {

D F irnE

g

I Ir

i Ft'

i:\ iN i\

9o

lo rd o.

{ N I / I

A /.f,

o { ;)i urI

rl -9 N C)

a \\, $

el N

\t ,$ "l

v, 9r

It F6

o

/

r\A s r

= o x

Ilt

\t}

l ,(h

FI

NW

TP

H-D

x

z v, ltt v, v m o G m vl |lI I

\N

WT

PH

-Gx

\B

TE

X

by

80

21

B

VO

C's

by

82

60

SV

OC

's by

82

70

RC

RA

-8 Me

lqls

r-uE

Ts

I6

v,

I

tO

I

+'

n ol

\g

.) n

\"

-i\

zl'

rr

!v

t=

-Q

q

\6

UI = -(,

t- rn n (/,

(d'

o 0I \\r,

-\

m (/, z

=d

F8 9

E -

:o

O

){

Qo

3

=d

d*

I I

eo

7

X4

* s

gn S n

-J

cX

a(

,4

f r-

O

- *r

ol

o

cq

l d

2u

l F

>P

l = 6

+l

O

c

dl

*=

:,

1

o

\.,

Xl

-

=ii_

|u

l rn

<l "l

3

il i

tr e

#A t

H s g

5d

a

u B

t i

ri

g R

€ ic

R

5 S

G b

s!

N

€

5

$

x s

!''

=n o o o o o

n o c o x

n o f o J o o :

\[ \\l

N/

\ \ t\\ \

q o z c n m

Y \tr $ \

-11

n z I z rTl

3 s E o o o

Y K h t.r'$

o o = 'o z

o o F t\ \ \ w'

-n

\\

I

= rTl



1

CASE NARRATIVE This case narrative encompasses samples received on June 12, 2013 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the SoundEarth Strategies TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID’s listed below. Laboratory ID SoundEarth Strategies 306185-01 B21-05 306185-02 B21-10 306185-03 B21-18 306185-04 B21-20 306185-05 B21-21 306185-06 B23-05 306185-07 B23-10 306185-08 B23-18 306185-09 B23-25 306185-10 B23-26 306185-11 B23-35 306185-12 B23-40 306185-13 B23-45 306185-14 B22-05 306185-15 B22-10 306185-16 B22-15 306185-17 B22-20 306185-18 B22-30 306185-19 B22-37.5 306185-20 B24-05 306185-21 B24-15 306185-22 B24-17.5 306185-23 B24-28 All quality control requirements were acceptable.



2

Date of Report: 06/21/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185 Date Extracted: 06/13/13 and 06/18/13 Date Analyzed: 06/13/13 and 06/18/13




Ethyl Total Gasoline Surrogate Sample ID Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Range (% Recovery) Laboratory ID (Limit 50-132) B21-10 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 84 306185-02 B21-18 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 81 306185-03

B21-20 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 89 306185-04

B23-10 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 88 306185-07

B23-18 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.21 5.6 88 306185-08

B23-26 <1 9.5 11 44 5,000 108 306185-10 1/50

B23-35 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 3.1 88 306185-11

B22-10 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 79 306185-15

B22-15 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 88 306185-16

B22-20 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 88 306185-17



3

Date of Report: 06/21/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185 Date Extracted: 06/13/13 and 06/18/13 Date Analyzed: 06/13/13 and 06/18/13




Ethyl Total Gasoline Surrogate Sample ID Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Range (% Recovery) Laboratory ID (Limit 50-132) B22-30 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 91 306185-18

B24-15 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 85 306185-21

B24-17.5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 90 306185-22 Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 87 03-1097 MB

Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 82 03-1160 MB



4

Analysis For Volatile Compounds By EPA Method 8260C Client Sample ID: B21-18 Client: SoundEarth Strategies Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7 Date Extracted: 06/13/13 Lab ID: 306185-03 Date Analyzed: 06/13/13 Data File: 061334.D Matrix: Soil Instrument: GCMS4 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Operator: JS Lower Upper Surrogates: % Recovery: Limit: Limit: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 59 116 Toluene-d8 101 51 121 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99 32 146 Concentration Compounds: mg/kg (ppm) Naphthalene <0.05



5

Analysis For Volatile Compounds By EPA Method 8260C Client Sample ID: Method Blank Client: SoundEarth Strategies Date Received: NA Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7 Date Extracted: 06/13/13 Lab ID: 03-1108 mb Date Analyzed: 06/13/13 Data File: 061308.D Matrix: Soil Instrument: GCMS4 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Operator: JS Lower Upper Surrogates: % Recovery: Limit: Limit: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 105 59 116 Toluene-d8 101 51 121 4-Bromofluorobenzene 103 32 146 Concentration Compounds: mg/kg (ppm) Naphthalene <0.05



6



XYLENES, AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING METHOD 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx


Reporting

Units

Sample Result

(Wet Wt)

Duplicate Result

(Wet Wt)

RPD


Reporting

Units

Spike Level

Percent Recovery

LCS

Acceptance




7





Reporting

Units

Sample Result

(Wet Wt)

Duplicate Result

(Wet Wt)

RPD


Reporting

Units

Spike Level

Percent Recovery

LCS

Acceptance




8


QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR VOLATILES BY EPA METHOD 8260C

Laboratory Code: 306157-02 (Matrix Spike) Analyte

Reporting

Units

Spike Level

Sample Result

(Wet wt)

Percent Recovery

MS

Percent Recovery

MSD

Acceptance

Criteria

RPD

(Limit 20) Naphthalene mg/kg (ppm) 2.5 0.50 60 56 14-157 7 Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Analyte

Reporting

Units

Spike Level

Percent Recovery

LCS

Acceptance

Criteria Naphthalene mg/kg (ppm) 2.5 88 63-140



9



























ll

U' o a n o E -{ o

.?

4q

qo

od

',

aq

.d

li

; l

ul

I l-

Lt1

la

l-

19

lo

lo

I\

g

l='

ldl

dl

gH

ll

>l

fl

t<

ta

tt

ot

+I

l

-g

tt

to

ll

lo

ll

ls

tt

lt

tl

||

lt

tl

tr

l

J o + L lo l+ lG)

to lo.

ll t\o

to I I I I I 'Tl x

v, = .u F m o - z o -l o G v, -| o (' \ \]h iq,

Sr ! t\ I

\,\)

5r \J IrI) _r {

il) U uJ I NJ

- s

il) i9 luJ

il

ii,i'

iJl

it

"l.l

)./

J) ! U i

$) iU iuJ

i iI iU i(^il, U Lt

J! N

rx)

IP rlJ .I o

F iu iw it io ittti-,

.11

lN I il itr -

it-.i

iN i il

I lp ic

id iN it m

,I I i

il LJ a a

lUt)

iN li

iq ivi

i i

alr o 3 p. o c,

II

I6l Ut-

! 1 -1 ic-t

J

IFJ

FI

OJ fx

J' .J]

f.IJ Y

ii [i

)t

^l(

.fir

/ |

-

ti

.!$

iC

Lli

;i

ll

ii

i

UU n

si

l

l'\

v!

gH\)

sF

\s

\ T

:I

$fe i

vJ s\

ra 71

) tr3

',.)

tl.> $o i.l

D h t.

ifn

E5

Is s

vl .E

'P

O

do

o,

; p Ji

= I) o

G "l

li

r'!c

-ic

it>

i./

iOiu

l ic',J

I

Ul

-c J,i c

o -Ct

0

o J c\

O rO vl I

vl

o o{\ vrl o

6-

;3

Fo

o

I t-l--

+

lr

3 o x

Fn

Fi

NW

TP

H-D

x

z v, ln a^ - m o c m vr tl| I

Xx

XY

xX

tN

WT

PH

-Gx

xx\

xx

xrt

BT

EX

b

y 8

02

1B

VO

C's

by

82

60

SV

OC

's by

82

70

RC

RA

-E Me

lols

\Y

atH

L['.

t5 iuo

\t s

t r,il

n--

l o

,L

f-'

m\,

' o z m

Y, '

9W J

o = t- rn a a/r

(o f, d

FP

q

5H

--

O!

Qo

3J

=T

P-E

f,I

qo

;g €9

? = O-

+o

cx

nv

zF

>s

Ad-

' EY

Z-

GO

-= m

n C f o J (o o o c = N o o

I s

3 tr

e#

A-

2 H

E g

$i

n

N N

S i

"i

g $

€ g

€I

N s

F

S.d

o

rb

S

=?

S

e

-dt.

€

q

'

:n o o o o x

n o ='

c f o ct x

lo o a.

o a1 :

g l s f o o(t 6 z c n m

) \ Srr\ l.! c -{ I A -r

Jo a { ( I

n z z = m

U)

te ic o b o .) (D o o

\ f N p

d C '_t. Ir l { s- )

o o -o z

1",\ \

o m

(?

\-t N

)!1

rn

(^) o O)

oO q

i8

OU

l-i

tN

ll

@l

t-

ll-

la

lo'

lgE

' ld

ts tH

l>

lrI<

tv

,to

ta

lrn

g

Il

ot

to

ll

sl

tt

lt

tt

lt

l

+ ; + ID IJ T I lu1 lo t+ t6-

T J f o :t I IN lo t? t(,

IO\

l'.

l.O to lo I I I I I 'Tl x

u, 3 ! F ltt o - z o at o c v, { o I .t frr

q o\ I fv I \^s {s { ,T

6) IN iC

j il iU ia

'oi\

/ \

FJ

N f : it

i- i--ts

Ji4

iil lf

!

i\J

ir

i jl

!- iJi[) iU if

,

il io iul

:

!-t iw !

n

I

i{J iir iw i}l "l

i6)

ip iu il il.il

CI

bJ IA

I

i\./ !U ir iiJ io

I h:r

llJ it-r

ir t- [rrI iF iu $.

Ji

r'|- io i i

p t9.)

i\.)

it

;vl

vr o 3 ! o €

I rif

i)i*

;ti

i i'

-!.

itJ iV iUF

fO

J ilxN ca

a.l J

)i iw I

liH i

t ilt

I

Jv |\N C

i t* YJ

I I

CI

tr

vr

I Isf

lt Jo

lt top

\5 bs

P+

I>;1 {

r P rn6

g

Ii ic

,\ i- l: S w

9o

eo Fr

o

i.l

iJ'j

UJ

ir

'

il

i I

N t".

l

UJ

9,

1t

v tA, t

t UJ c

).,)

}J vi

!J U C,

Y J, I

! c9

-t

tt

oo

('

3 o x

Ul-

\^F

TN

WT

PH

-Dx

z vr m

'(:<

\x

x*

NW

TP

H-G

x

xx

xx,

tB

TE

X

by

80

21

8

VO

C's

by

82

60

SV

OC

's by

82

7O

RC

RA

-g Me

tols

vr v m o G |lt v, fn I

(

= 6z o o 0

n rn n 7 U1

ln

at

or

t

Lv

rn

nO

td z

o r)

(/J

9J -0

(

(./,

T rn n a./,

(o c o=

\

I I

m 3 (/',

z

T o

F:

*g

:r

{

6

g5

H-

:o

0

)

l3 s

=i.

p.

q f

,J

I s

roa

;<

'a

sgd

n-

JC

Ro

43

-_

+

n

Ol

o c

ql

d2

ul

ii

>

ql F

pq

l x 3

Xl

-

+ii

lq

l rn

<l

"l

NI

o

A 3

$ i

tr g

tA

E

E *

:$

2

5 5

:

$g

f;

N N

I

is"

a

H S

I6

sg

F

N ;

H8

o

fu s

=g

I

Dd

:n o o o r

n g f o 6'

J o o o xI I I I

d o g o o :s

\ )

tn

lo

lo

lc

iq

IJ

to

io

to

!.

<

N.-

S | \.. IA iv t\

il

ii

I i I

v, o z n m

v \ \'

IJ

) 'r ( C 1J n. .\ -r n )

T n z I z rn

a Se

EI

nt I o t) (E

F N ll

vt

a c ) i_ flr \ t

3 -It z

g D l" tl

\\ N \

fTl

I t)\

\ N \n= 3 m




August 1, 2013 Ryan Bixby, Project Manager SoundEarth Strategies 2811 Fairview Ave. East, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98102 Dear Mr. Bixby: Included are the additional results from the testing of material submitted on June 12, 2013 from the TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185 project. There is 1 page included in this report. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you should have any questions. Sincerely, FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.




1

CASE NARRATIVE This case narrative encompasses samples received on June 12, 2013 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the SoundEarth Strategies TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID’s listed below. Laboratory ID SoundEarth Strategies 306185-01 B21-05 306185-02 B21-10 306185-03 B21-18 306185-04 B21-20 306185-05 B21-21 306185-06 B23-05 306185-07 B23-10 306185-08 B23-18 306185-09 B23-25 306185-10 B23-26 306185-11 B23-35 306185-12 B23-40 306185-13 B23-45 306185-14 B22-05 306185-15 B22-10 306185-16 B22-15 306185-17 B22-20 306185-18 B22-30 306185-19 B22-37.5 306185-20 B24-05 306185-21 B24-15 306185-22 B24-17.5 306185-23 B24-28 Sample B23-26 was sent to Fremont for EPH and VPH analyses. Review of the enclosed report indicates that all quality assurance were acceptable.

July 29, 2013

Friedman & BruyaMichael Erdahl

Attention Michael Erdahl:

RE: 306185Lab ID: 1307084

3012 16th Ave. W.Seattle, WA 98119

3600 Fremont Ave. N.Seattle, WA 98103

T: (206) 352-3790F: (206) 352-7178

[email protected]

Fremont Analytical, Inc. received 1 sample(s) on 7/16/2013 for the analyses presented in the following report.

Michael Dee

This report consists of the following:

- Case Narrative - Analytical Results - Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports - Chain of Custody

All analyses were performed consistent with the Quality Assurance program of Fremont Analytical, Inc. Please contact the laboratory if you should have any questions about the results.

Thank you for using Fremont Analytical.

Sincerely,

Sr. Chemist / Principal

Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWEPHSample Moisture (Percent Moisture)Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWVPH

www.fremontanalytical.com

Page 1 of 13

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.fremontanalytical.com

07/29/2013Date:

Project: 306185CLIENT: Friedman & Bruya

Lab Order: 1307084

Work Order Sample Summary

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date/Time ReceivedDate/Time Collected

1307084-001 B23-26 06/11/2013 10:10 AM 07/16/2013 2:00 PM

Note: If no "Time Collected" is supplied, a default of 12:00AM is assigned

Page 2 of 13

Project: 306185CLIENT: Friedman & Bruya

7/29/2013

Case Narrative1307084

Date:WO#:

I. SAMPLE RECEIPT:Samples receipt information is recorded on the attached Sample Receipt Checklist.

II. GENERAL REPORTING COMMENTS:Results are reported on a wet weight basis unless dry-weight correction is denoted in the units field on the analytical report ("mg/kg-dry" or "ug/kg-dry").

Matrix Spike (MS) and MS Duplicate (MSD) samples are tested from an analytical batch of "like" matrix to check for possible matrix effect. The MS and MSD will provide site specific matrix data only for those samples which are spiked by the laboratory. The sample chosen for spike purposes may or may not have been a sample submitted in this sample delivery group. The validity of the analytical procedures for which data is reported in this analytical report is determined by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB). The LCS and the MB are processed with the samples and the MS/MSD to ensure method criteria are achieved throughout the entire analytical process.

III. ANALYSES AND EXCEPTIONS:Exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the analytical results page(s) or the quality control summary page(s) and/or noted below.

Page 3 of 13

Project: 306185

Client Sample ID: B23-26

Collection Date: 6/11/2013 10:10:00 AM

Matrix: Soil

Client: Friedman & Bruya

Lab ID: 1307084-001

Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFRL

Analytical Report

7/29/20131307084

Date Reported:WO#:

Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWEPH Analyst: BRBatch ID: 5005

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) DH 7/22/2013 11:09:00 AM56.0 mg/Kg-dry 10101Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) H 7/20/2013 7:05:00 AM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 176.8Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) H 7/20/2013 7:05:00 AM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 118.7Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) H 7/20/2013 7:05:00 AM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 1NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) H 7/20/2013 7:05:00 AM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 1NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) H 7/20/2013 12:56:00 PM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 140.2Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) DH 7/22/2013 1:20:00 PM56.0 mg/Kg-dry 10145Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) H 7/20/2013 12:56:00 PM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 159.7Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) H 7/20/2013 12:56:00 PM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 116.8Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) H 7/20/2013 12:56:00 PM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 1ND Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane H 7/20/2013 7:05:00 AM65-140 %REC 178.6 Surr: o-Terphenyl H 7/20/2013 12:56:00 PM65-140 %REC 184.1

Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWVPH Analyst: EMBatch ID: 5019

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C5-C6) H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 10.974Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C6-C8) H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 112.3Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) DH 7/23/2013 1:34:00 AM4.89 mg/Kg-dry 2020.2Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) DH 7/23/2013 1:34:00 AM4.89 mg/Kg-dry 2053.9Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 152.4Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) DH 7/23/2013 1:34:00 AM4.89 mg/Kg-dry 20134Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C13) DH 7/23/2013 1:34:00 AM4.89 mg/Kg-dry 2051.6Benzene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 1NDToluene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 10.613Ethylbenzene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 1NDm,p-Xylene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 10.342o-Xylene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 1NDNaphthalene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 1NDMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 1ND Surr: Bromofluorobenzene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM65-140 %REC 199.8 Surr: Trifluorotoluene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM65-140 %REC 169.2

Sample Moisture (Percent Moisture) Analyst: KASBatch ID: R9226

Percent Moisture 7/16/2013 4:11:18 PMwt% 114.0

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was requiredE Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceededJ Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit

RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits

Page 4 of 13

Project: 306185CLIENT: Friedman & BruyaWork Order: 1307084 QC SUMMARY REPORT

Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWEPH

7/29/2013Date:

Sample ID: 1307113-001BDUP

Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/20/2013

Prep Date: 7/18/2013

Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual

Units: mg/Kg-dry

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 9376

SeqNo: 188440

DUPSampType:

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 30 H7.31 104.6 25.181.3Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 30 EH7.31 645.3 23.4510Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 30 EH7.31 1,671 21.81,340Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 30 EH7.31 358.3 21.1290Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 30 H7.31 16.25 6.8415.2 Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 5.847 79.9 65 140 H04.67

Sample ID: 1307113-001BDUP




Units: mg/Kg-dry

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 9376

SeqNo: 188441

DUPSampType:

Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 30 RH7.31 0 0NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 30 RH7.31 46.95 43.430.2Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 30 REH7.31 326.1 36.2226Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 30 EH7.31 277.4 28.1209Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 30 H7.31 11.03 25.08.58 Surr: o-Terphenyl 5.847 78.1 65 140 H04.56

NOTES:R - High RPD indicates a possible matrix interference . The method is in control as indicated by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS and LCSD).

Sample ID: CCV-5005B




Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: CCV

RunNo: 9376

SeqNo: 188453

CCVSampType:

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 100.0 87.4 80 1205.00 087.4Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 50.00 86.0 80 1205.00 043.0Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 50.00 85.4 80 1205.00 042.7Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 50.00 80.5 80 1205.00 040.3

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit

R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits

Page 5 of 13



7/29/2013Date:





Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: CCV

RunNo: 9376

SeqNo: 188453

CCVSampType:

Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 40.00 93.7 80 12037.5





Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: CCV

RunNo: 9376

SeqNo: 188454

CCVSampType:

Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 50.00 98.0 80 1205.00 049.0Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 50.00 94.9 80 1205.00 047.4Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 50.00 96.0 80 1205.00 048.0 Surr: o-Terphenyl 40.00 91.1 80 12036.4

Sample ID: LCS-5005




Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: LCSS

RunNo: 9376

SeqNo: 188455

LCSSampType:

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 20.00 92.5 70 1305.00 018.5Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 10.00 78.5 70 1305.00 07.85Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 10.00 71.5 70 1305.00 07.15Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 10.00 76.6 70 1305.00 07.66Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 10.00 76.1 70 1305.00 07.61 Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 4.000 94.4 65 1403.78

Sample ID: LCS-5005




Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: LCSS

RunNo: 9376

SeqNo: 188456

LCSSampType:

Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 10.00 74.4 70 1305.00 07.44




Page 6 of 13



7/29/2013Date:

Sample ID: LCS-5005




Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: LCSS

RunNo: 9376

SeqNo: 188456

LCSSampType:

Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 10.00 73.4 70 1305.00 07.34Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 10.00 72.2 70 1305.00 07.22Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 10.00 74.4 70 1305.00 07.44Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 10.00 73.2 70 1305.00 07.32 Surr: o-Terphenyl 4.000 72.4 65 1402.90

Sample ID: LCSD-5005




Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: LCSS02

RunNo: 9376

SeqNo: 188457

LCSDSampType:

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 20.00 94.2 70 130 205.00 0 18.50 1.8018.8Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 10.00 78.3 70 130 205.00 0 7.849 0.2127.83Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 10.00 73.2 70 130 205.00 0 7.154 2.277.32Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 10.00 75.0 70 130 205.00 0 7.663 2.157.50Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 10.00 74.0 70 130 205.00 0 7.607 2.747.40 Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 4.000 95.3 65 140 03.81

Sample ID: LCSD-5005




Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: LCSS02

RunNo: 9376

SeqNo: 188458

LCSDSampType:

Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 10.00 72.1 70 130 205.00 0 7.439 3.147.21Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 10.00 71.0 70 130 205.00 0 7.341 3.407.10Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 10.00 73.6 70 130 205.00 0 7.215 2.007.36Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 10.00 81.9 70 130 205.00 0 7.442 9.628.19Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 10.00 81.8 70 130 205.00 0 7.320 11.18.18 Surr: o-Terphenyl 4.000 82.4 65 140 03.30




Page 7 of 13



7/29/2013Date:

Sample ID: MB-5005




Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: MBLKS

RunNo: 9376

SeqNo: 188460

MBLKSampType:

Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 5.00NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 5.00NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 5.00NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 5.00NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 5.00ND Surr: o-Terphenyl 4.000 68.2 65 1402.73

Sample ID: MB-5005




Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: MBLKS

RunNo: 9376

SeqNo: 188461

MBLKSampType:

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 5.00NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 5.00NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 5.00NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 5.00NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 5.00ND Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 4.000 85.2 65 1403.41




Page 8 of 13


Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWVPH

7/29/2013Date:

Sample ID: 1307113-001AMS




Units: mg/Kg-dry

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 9386

SeqNo: 188654

MSSampType:

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C5-C6) 84.84 90.0 70 130 H0.707 076.3Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C6-C8) 28.28 97.6 70 130 H0.707 4.09131.7Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 28.28 38.9 70 130 SH0.707 33.0444.0Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 28.28 34.2 70 130 SEH0.707 111.7121Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 113.1 80.5 70 130 H0.707 64.13155Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 28.28 67.1 70 130 SEH0.707 281.5300Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C13) 28.28 71.0 70 130 EH0.707 231.0251Benzene 28.28 87.5 70 130 H0.707 024.7Toluene 28.28 88.7 70 130 H0.707 025.1Ethylbenzene 28.28 90.0 70 130 H0.707 025.4m,p-Xylene 56.56 91.2 70 130 H0.707 051.6o-Xylene 28.28 88.7 70 130 H0.707 025.1Naphthalene 28.28 56.2 70 130 SH0.707 6.00921.9Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 28.28 87.2 70 130 H0.707 024.7 Surr: Bromofluorobenzene 3.535 104 65 140 H3.68 Surr: Trifluorotoluene 3.535 84.9 65 140 H3.00

NOTES:S - Outlying QC recoveries were associated with this sample. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.

Sample ID: 1307085-001ADUP




Units: mg/Kg-dry

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 9386

SeqNo: 188659

DUPSampType:

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C5-C6) 0 25 EH0.279 0 20.60 1.6520.9Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C6-C8) 0 25 EH0.279 0 84.38 1.2083.4Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 0 25 EH0.279 0 84.55 7.4291.1Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 0 25 EH0.279 0 50.59 9.9555.9Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 0 25 EH0.279 0 109.6 2.06112Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 0 25 EH0.279 0 133.5 4.12128




Page 9 of 13



7/29/2013Date:

Sample ID: 1307085-001ADUP




Units: mg/Kg-dry

RL

Client ID: BATCH

RunNo: 9386

SeqNo: 188659

DUPSampType:

Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C13) 0 25 EH0.279 0 17.69 3.0217.2Benzene 0 25 H0.279 0 0 0NDToluene 0 25 RH0.279 0 0.4252 27.70.562Ethylbenzene 0 25 H0.279 0 1.208 1.291.22m,p-Xylene 0 25 H0.279 0 2.337 0.2292.34o-Xylene 0 25 H0.279 0 0 0NDNaphthalene 0 25 H0.279 0 1.504 0.8061.49Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 0 25 H0.279 0 0 0ND Surr: Bromofluorobenzene 1.397 101 65 140 H01.41 Surr: Trifluorotoluene 1.397 67.9 65 140 H00.949

NOTES:R - High RPD indicates a possible matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the laboratory control sample (LCS).

Sample ID: LCS-5019




Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: LCSS

RunNo: 9386

SeqNo: 188663

LCSSampType:

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C5-C6) 60.00 82.2 70 1300.500 049.3Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C6-C8) 20.00 95.3 70 1300.500 019.1Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 20.00 87.3 70 1300.500 017.5Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 20.00 112 70 1300.500 022.4Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 80.00 87.5 70 1300.500 070.0Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 20.00 106 70 1300.500 021.1Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C13) 20.00 101 70 1300.500 020.1Benzene 20.00 89.4 70 1300.500 017.9Toluene 20.00 89.1 70 1300.500 017.8Ethylbenzene 20.00 89.3 70 1300.500 017.9m,p-Xylene 40.00 89.7 70 1300.500 035.9o-Xylene 20.00 90.1 70 1300.500 018.0




Page 10 of 13



7/29/2013Date:

Sample ID: LCS-5019




Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: LCSS

RunNo: 9386

SeqNo: 188663

LCSSampType:

Naphthalene 20.00 110 70 1300.500 022.0Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 20.00 96.1 70 1300.500 019.2 Surr: Bromofluorobenzene 2.500 107 65 1402.68 Surr: Trifluorotoluene 2.500 105 65 1402.63

Sample ID: MB-5019




Units: mg/Kg

RL

Client ID: MBLKS

RunNo: 9386

SeqNo: 188664

MBLKSampType:

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C5-C6) 00.500 0NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C6-C8) 00.500 0NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 00.500 0NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 00.500 0NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 00.500 0NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 00.500 0NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C13) 00.500 0NDBenzene 00.500 0NDToluene 00.500 0NDEthylbenzene 00.500 0NDm,p-Xylene 00.500 0NDo-Xylene 00.500 0NDNaphthalene 00.500 0NDMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 00.500 0ND Surr: Bromofluorobenzene 2.500 108 65 1402.70 Surr: Trifluorotoluene 2.500 109 65 1402.73




Page 11 of 13

Date Received: 7/16/2013 2:00:00 PM

Client Name: FB Work Order Number: 1307084

Sample Log-In Check List

Chelsea WardLogged by:

Item Information

How was the sample delivered? Courier

Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes No Not Present

Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes No NA

Are samples properly preserved? Yes No

Was preservative added to bottles? Yes No NA

Did all samples containers arrive in good condition(unbroken)? Yes No

Does paperwork match bottle labels? Yes No

Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody? Yes No

Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes No

Is the headspace in the VOA vials? Yes No NA

1.2.

6.

10.11.

12.13.14.

15.16.17. Were all holding times able to be met? Yes No

Chain of Custody

Log In

7. Were all coolers received at a temperature of >0°C to 10.0°C Yes No NA

8. Sample(s) in proper container(s)? Yes No

9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)? Yes No

Special Handling (if applicable)

18.

19.

Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order? Yes No NA

Person Notified: Date:

Regarding:

Via: eMail Phone Fax In Person

Additional remarks:

Client Instructions:

By Whom:

Coolers are present? Yes No NA3.Sample kept in fridge until pick-up.

Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No4.Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No Not Required5.

Item # Temp ºC ConditionSample 9.8 Good

Page 12 of 13

ll

8 J o d o g r F t4 r F k d >

o o d I F Ir t> t< p I

o 'g q p !l t L lo tcl IF

T g o :* b E l! o x :rF

vl = .U F m o - P - o 'tl o c 0 -| o I \ rt",

iq-

Fl ( t\e I

\^) e

*S g.

\ h f\\)

\

*-.

t o

f1

m o z 3e

g,

9,

r//

-$ J

, o 3 , E

fllLl

-l+F ft

T

ot

t 2

ii

6tr

a?

2 o ) 8a

d2

E}

=o

(D

c

x3 = rn

n c J o J o (o o o c J o o o ct :<

Fd

FF

O Itr

9o

3I

+

!E

.Ef;

- HE

s9

5

3 I

r r

sil

E E

E t ;

tH

B

N "'

ir

F $

$ * t

$|

H ,{

ilf

'

3.=

n o o o o o o x

v o f o c t o o o

F o o 9.

o o o

v o I 5. d o

-{ s4 o z { F m

v \ Ir

t\ t\ c ) 7 t B {

! ! z z I n

u ! F ! o c, o a) o =' I

}J $I ) v )) I ! z

E I y1

\ \ w

o m

o$ vl

= tt

(t o f o n o o o .o

o o 3 o o l t to lc D lo TN to H lil to n.

lo

o ; o I !J t ID lo to

'9 J o f o r* b B o x :t

I I

J tr

sil

g E

E t ;

iI

u N

I i

rE

[ $

€ $

sI

I s

F 6

F;

H **

er

'+

=

tfi Vr 3 ! F |lt o - P - o at o G v, o (, -? Fr'

q O.

w '.tS t. ,l(\

t N s t U

n s ! I F 4

p lu r lf lri

;l \t

L., .r I ) -it

ilJ iJ p w N a

JJ p u I ,r[, )

p [J u I )J a

I v U I I1

p v I

F ts i iv

l

6 o 3 ! d C'

I

I i5,

iN lsti I f-

o \J riF

IO

J 5E

N c0;

J1"A

J+

j 4

J.,N c

4c

JIsf

,t

\9 tsF

)\c

sI

tJtl

;1 {

r rn6

g

= wflr

v/ od

r s ui"^

JF c

^/ .ll 'i

-r)

trt 1

u N;i }J r/

i9J U!J =o,

p

fltot-

t.3 *

ul-

oF

iN

t{IP

H-D

x

z 6 m UI - 6 C n 2 t|l I

,((

)x

x,*

NT

{T?

H.G

X

xt

x(

It

BIE

Xb

y t0

2lt

VO

C'r

by

t26

0

SV

OC

'r W

lfl,

TO

tClA

.t

m.lo

lt

(E

- 3 O

I

n rfl 3 v 7l at

-1 d

oh

oa z

e*

ri

dp

-0 -0

(

(/,

! m n v1 c!.

(o J o -

\ \\

o an 3 u, z

! o :t

I(g

dF

siE

s19

a*3O

H€

3 s

gii

-'

g o f O{

oc

d.2

i\>

'-n

EO

oc x6 = tn

F

F c J o q o o o c = 9. N o o u

:k I I IN l-

o

n o o o ?'

o o .g

4 g l € t o o g

v o o o o o ct x

\ J

4 g f € d o o S tl

I

2 o z a m

v \ \'

C -) r t C .U ) .T T )

! 4, z z 3 rn

g B ! I rl 8 c

p b )

a G c ) -t Ir f

o o 3 ! z

g l lq\

\ \ t^,

I nt

Io n

\\ H

= 1r



1

CASE NARRATIVE This case narrative encompasses samples received on June 12, 2013 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the SoundEarth Strategies TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306186 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID’s listed below. Laboratory ID SoundEarth Strategies 306186 -01 B26-19 306186 -02 B26-35 306186 -03 B26-40 306186 -04 B30-22.5 306186 -05 B30-25 306186 -06 B30-27 306186 -07 B30-32 306186 -08 B30-36 306186 -09 B30-40 306186 -10 B27-23.5 306186 -11 B27-28.5 306186 -12 B27-30 306186 -13 B27-35 306186 -14 B27-40 306186 -15 B25-10 306186 -16 B25-18 306186 -17 B25-20 306186 -18 B25-25 306186 -19 B25-27.5 306186 -20 B25-30 306186 -21 B25-35 Sample B25-30 was not received in a 5035 sampling container. The data were flagged accordingly. All other quality control requirements were acceptable.



2






B30-25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 92 306186-05

B30-27 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 87 306186-06

B30-32 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 88 306186-07

B27-28.5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 89 306186-11

B27-35 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 85 306186-13

B27-40 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 90 306186-14

B25-18 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 98 306186-16

B25-20 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 87 306186-17 B25-30 pc <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 93 306186-20

B25-35 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 91 306186-21



3





Ethyl Total Gasoline Surrogate Sample ID Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Range (% Recovery) Laboratory ID (Limit 50-150) Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 87 03-1097 MB

Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 85 03-1159 MB

Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 89 03-1202 MB



4



XYLENES, AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING METHOD 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx


Reporting

Units

Sample Result

(Wet Wt)

Duplicate Result

(Wet Wt)

RPD


Reporting

Units

Spike Level

Percent Recovery

LCS

Acceptance




5





Reporting

Units

Sample Result

(Wet Wt)

Duplicate Result

(Wet Wt)

RPD


Reporting

Units

Spike Level

Percent Recovery

LCS

Acceptance




6





Reporting

Units

Sample Result

(Wet Wt)

Duplicate Result

(Wet Wt)

RPD


Reporting

Units

Spike Level

Percent Recovery

LCS

Acceptance




7



























gt*

t, 3 l ts I I I lv,

lo tl lm lg IT lv1

l+ lo t+ lo (o 16

'l- I I I I I I I I I I I

o N @ T v 3.

o { l< lo tm

O -vr

!D !l 'o

f f o I I IN l? t(, t? IG t8 I I I I I 'Tt o x

rn 3 ! F m o - P z o 'n o G 0 o c \ a.l

q s\ \ t" \ \, s $

il LJ t' I \./

0 U "tJ

I ,../$ }J + ! p qb

J.r

N +.J

I p w

"^l

rl

w I r cJ

F NI

!I i U.J

6'

tlrJ

n vJ t)

T N -r I }J rl

-li

F JJ i. )J f\

el

il \}J n I p N ,4

<\ N \\.\

\J b'

I F

-i N U u t \}J

0 L) bt

t o 3 g o c,

$l \ t'

i-

l I

Wl

r i

iLl

/ i

f, l

Vi I

-l l.J.J

('I ).)

c

F{

o5 HX

,.)''

i!

i

J]iw C

rH n

ili

\Pl

.Air

i I I

( \l

!v'

lr.

:v

:.)t U

p +lu J'

\ I

U U rl

J O,.J 4

-sF

gE

E.

-o

ils)

oa s

Q )OJ

,J fo

) rN

) n9 t C

i\o

$

s -s | 1.,

9o

PO

Fo

o

,N d"\, N rj

! C

N /f

'r-

/ I

: l'J

-: p a,u

it

/l I

r}n -c ../

lc

^i

{}

,n

v'

W

nr

n

J iU

.Jo

io 1

[- ;t ro o,

)\= o x

U)

Fi

NW

TP

H-D

x

z vr EI

3t,

- m o m v, fll E,

YY

i\ix

(.r

t.X

NW

IPH

-Gx

X.

\i

(B

TE

X

by

80

21

8

VO

C's

by

82

60

SV

OC

's by

82

70

RC

RA

-E M

elq

ls

I

\-

t- p isf

r

n m 3 v 7 (./,

nI

L-I

mc

iO (\z

o*

/{ \z

ut9

-s

= f, d q o d

a.-.

s* $m (/

)

z

-

=d

9s5

E

'{

9o

3=

dd

Hf,

I

ec

l

$ su

(t, o' O

ro

cA

Nv

zi

i>

'-

n:

oo

cg

z-

= rn

n c

n f o f v d o c + :t N o o

i*tI$

F s : t

$H

[dn o o a

.o o o

nl

ot Fi

ci

fl ol

oi

o;

-<

i q I I ! I

nl

oi

ol

a.i

<i

ol

<i

.'

t I I.

l4

(,

1 I

lt

Ir

it

ll

i

\i

\i i

n E f g.

J o o o :

\-\ h-\ \

(, o z c n m

Lry \ $

i.

-J

o C ') + 3 I # .] tr

T n z -{ z = m

\ f $

. l',

(-)

C iJ t(\ it'it

i$ i1 i< i<

-i)

3 T z

\ \0 -{ rn

rt N (tl

= rn

(t)

ra t-t

I K I l,\

-,

c)

t, o Ct \ 6\

fr

3o

ol

a

lr

tN

ll

@l

l-

lal-

' 19

t?'

t6to

tA

'l€

ti

FI

Jl<

tq

lo

lxt

to

l{

oI

lo'

ll

-t

lt

lt

ll

lt

lt

lt

lr

l

O ; + o- + I t\ T aJl o o + = o

T J ) o * l." to t$ t(,

lo to.

ll

l.O to to I T x

v, = T 7 tft o - P z o 'tt o c TA

-l o I \ cfl o \\ : \-,

p "r

8o

\)

i;\ s

si )Jl

4:

lt

,pl

.t\ |T

JU 4 I s ,

t

"l.J

f. Jl s .4

r'l N $ tl I \ 4

(l N \r]

Jl I \

-)./

N A \rl

I ts

N U 4 ! o

-N v tJ I |. p "1

N u *j I O

vr o 3 g o E'

JJ L" ,^

uil

! n

f \,, $i

F6

OJ gE

I.

U ul

JJ l\.

tl

\J

i.

,i

",

+l.

v i

!'

i

^l

nn

ir

l1,\

z./

i:

I,

i:

^n

j

ci

-i

s

UiJ

ll

J\

i

Bg

EE

I tr dr

5 P \N

5A

Ja

\t\L I (n

Eg

|-'

I I i

6- = ;

v, .tr,

3c

l

to

o

i i I I ti ,l

t:

i Ui

i"\j

i'.0

.t

l

/) }J;

l ot- ul

fi

(. CI

lr)

Lt/ fr

dl wI

v, 9=

€3

Fo

q

I:

)

iF-+

A il'-

;U ;-

3 o * x

l ti

ti

idp

t-iv

lF

AN

WT

PH

-Dx

z Vr

m vl v tn o tn ta m

Go

\t

xN

tlfT

PH

-Gx

co

Xt

XB

IEX

by

80

21

8

:l

VO

C's

by

82

60

SV

OC

's by

82

70

RC

RA

-8 Me

lols

I

r?

*l'F

= {*

I i*\

s ?

n r n T l.^j o

_\

(./l 3 -o t- rn n a/, d

rn (./, z

(/l O

-r

^-

rc

4Z

F>

<x

<\.

,,(

DC

AZ rt

l

n c f o :t o J N o x

pg

=9

--

O)

9o

3d

d#

I e

o;1

'9

0;

g

= : { J e o 6'

J

3

s i

s g

ilE

E E

i ;r

f U

N I

is

.$

g *

€ 5

€B

F

s

F b

.d;

H 'f

i';.

.o

3

'o =

_

n o o a,

o x

n 9. j' o g,

f o o o .</

'.t I t

ni

oi

oi

a.i

<i

oi

ni

o!

.<

i ir

lt

l

t-l

it

td

t,

lt

t

Ir

Jf

ll

tt

li

\t

i\

l\

i)

i I ! i

n g l g,

o : t--

i\_ $ {\

(, ^ z i n rn

l---r

! I

\i ,'

l

\jt

\l

\l

*i

! I i I I I i Ii

il

i) >,

A 5 f ) l. s p I 2 T f *)

1' 4. z -.1 z rn

I I | ),

/l-

P IF iN i\

! i i

LN a c fit H

l) T

T z S \ w

o m

! I I I

-f-

NJ \n

_- = rn

U)

1) n Fl

!'t I I c)




December 10, 2013 Ryan Bixby, Project Manager SoundEarth Strategies 2811 Fairview Ave. East, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98102 Dear Mr. Bixby: Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on November 20, 2013 from the TOC_01-399_20131120 WORFDB7, F&BI 311382 project. There are 4 pages included in this report. Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for disposal in 30 days. If you would like us to return your samples or arrange for long term storage at our offices, please contact us as soon as possible. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you should have any questions. Sincerely, FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.




1

CASE NARRATIVE This case narrative encompasses samples received on November 20, 2013 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the SoundEarth Strategies TOC_01-399_20131120 WORFDB7, F&BI 311382 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID’s listed below. Laboratory ID SoundEarth Strategies 311382 -01 B31-15 311382 -02 B31-20 311382 -03 B31-22.5 311382 -04 B31-25 311382 -05 AS04- 22.5 311382 -06 AS04- 25.5 311382 -07 AS04- 27.5 311382 -08 AS04- 37 All quality control requirements were acceptable.



2






B31-22.5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 110 311382-03

Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 108 03-2408 MB



3




Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Analyte

Reporting

Units

Spike Level

Percent Recovery

LCS

Percent Recovery

LCSD

Acceptance

Criteria

RPD

(Limit 20) Benzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 84 84 69-120 0 Toluene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 90 90 70-117 0 Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 96 95 65-123 1 Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) 1.5 94 93 66-120 1 Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) 20 100 100 71-131 0



4













ip - Recovery fell outside of normal control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix inter fered with the quantitation of the analyte.














o 3 - ) r I l(/', lo lf lo lm lo lf lr lq

, lo lo'

{o to l- I I I I I I I I I I

lo

J-

.n

YS

oJ

-

aa

o+

d'

,2

lo

'l

lE

Nl

Nl+

,T

l=

t(,

I t-

lS

|.

la

FF

FI

l"=

lrI

lsl9

d'

to

toX

,l

N

lr

n,+

'l

19

tt

t+

I

rl

I

18

'l

Ih

tl

to

tl

t?

t

I

l€

ll

tt

ll

'l

v, 3 T m o - u o at o c v, o I (\ tt

I s I

\^s

$ F

ul o 3 E o - Ff

OJ

gE gH 3o

**

ct

m a/,

F ln o c m a,/,

m 0

BT

EX

b

y 8

02

18

SV

OC

's by

82

70

aT

3t

1f,

.l-

q

ol

v\

,\

l

n m .P-.

.n . (-

/, I I I I I I I I

-r

ro

to

-1.

L

o'

i5,

z

U :q

\z

dl

v-S t-

l(

, - rn n (, 6 (o-'

l o

\,rd

l..''\

\\ ,r

\\\

I\

\l

'l

rl

Nl

r\

lr

\\

|

TN (./,

z

.s

I l:*

el=

Y-t

4l

oS

Xl

Qi

Vu

tl

:o

O

){.

Q o

3+

<-

-J

-

A

-

J\

Vf

.\

-o

h

=

\J

=

Ya

b

xx

=

x-Y

x

-'>

(/)

o' l O-

+

^2

,

F>

>n

a-

Y6

m

n c UI -

n c :r o J d o c J o N o r :

3

d i

F s

ilZ

:

: f.

i.

.,q

x

.N

N

=

_

i

2

E g

i $

dS

rs

N

E

E E

)

>tr

i 5

$ €

g€

F

5 s

F b

0;

I

5

=g

X

s-i

9

n o o o o fJ 5

ln

lo

t:

l!

lo

l-

t<

t"

ln

lo

lo

le

.t

<t

ol

o N N tl \tl

nl

o

t!

tl

-

Iil

lo

t-

\N \l

\ \

l'

l $lV1 z = - T|

R \ I \ \ N \

J LI JJ

I

: 2 3 rT

T ts\ rh \ r.

lo o = z

s SS \

o .< rn

$o f$. I

= = m

supplemental subsurface investigation report

Documents