supplementary materials and methodsgenesdev.cshlp.org/.../gad.270611.115.dc1/suppmaterial.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Supplementary Materials and Methods
Crystal structure determination
Diffraction data were collected at rotating anode or synchrotron radiation sources and
processed with XDS (Kabsch 2010) and AIMLESS (Evans and Murshudov 2013). The
SPKRIA complex structure was solved by molecular replacement using PHASER
(McCoy et al. 2007) with coordinates of PDB entry 2EX4, and subsequently served as
starting model for crystal structures of the other peptides’ complexes. Programs COOT
(Emsley et al. 2010), REFMAC (Murshudov et al. 2011), MOLPROBITY (Chen et al.
2010) and the PARVATI server (Merritt 1999) were used for rebuilding, restrained
refinement, geometry validation and model anisotropy analysis, respectively. Geometry
restraints for methylated proline were calculated with PRODRG (Schuttelkopf and van
Aalten 2004). IOTBX software (Gildea et al. 2011), PDB_EXTRACT (Yang et al. 2004)
as well as CCP4 (Winn et al. 2011) and PHENIX (Adams et al. 2010) programs were
used to compile model statistics.
Mass spectrometry
MALDI-MS based methylation assay was carried out through Applied Biosystems
Voyager matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer to
monitor the methylation of peptides in the presence of NTMT1 without addition of SAM
(Richardson et al. 2015). The assay was set up as the ITC condition. At 2h, sample was
withdrawn from reaction mixtures and 1:1 quenched with 3µL of quenching solution
(50% MeCN/20mM ammonium phosphate/0.4%TFA). 1µL of each samples were spotted
with 1µL � -Cyano-3-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix solution, and analyzed by
Biosystems Voyager matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass
spectrometer. Obtained data was processed through Data Explore TM.
AdamsPD,AfoninePV,BunkocziG,ChenVB,DavisIW,EcholsN,HeaddJJ,HungLW,
KapralGJ,Grosse-KunstleveRWetal.2010.PHENIX:acomprehensive
Python-basedsystemformacromolecularstructuresolution.ActacrystallographicaSectionD,Biologicalcrystallography66:213-221.
ChenVB,ArendallWB,3rd,HeaddJJ,KeedyDA,ImmorminoRM,KapralGJ,Murray
LW,RichardsonJS,RichardsonDC.2010.MolProbity:all-atomstructure
validationformacromolecularcrystallography.ActacrystallographicaSectionD,Biologicalcrystallography66:12-21.
EmsleyP,LohkampB,ScottWG,CowtanK.2010.FeaturesanddevelopmentofCoot.
ActacrystallographicaSectionD,Biologicalcrystallography66:486-501.EvansPR,MurshudovGN.2013.Howgoodaremydataandwhatistheresolution?
ActacrystallographicaSectionD,Biologicalcrystallography69:1204-1214.GildeaRJ,BourhisLJ,DolomanovOV,Grosse-KunstleveRW,PuschmannH,Adams
PD,HowardJA.2011.iotbx.cif:acomprehensiveCIFtoolbox.Journalofappliedcrystallography44:1259-1263.
KabschW.2010.Xds.ActacrystallographicaSectionD,Biologicalcrystallography66:125-132.
McCoyAJ,Grosse-KunstleveRW,AdamsPD,WinnMD,StoroniLC,ReadRJ.2007.
Phasercrystallographicsoftware.Journalofappliedcrystallography40:658-674.
MerrittEA.1999.Expandingthemodel:anisotropicdisplacementparametersin
proteinstructurerefinement.ActacrystallographicaSectionD,Biologicalcrystallography55:1109-1117.
MurshudovGN,SkubakP,LebedevAA,PannuNS,SteinerRA,NichollsRA,WinnMD,
LongF,VaginAA.2011.REFMAC5fortherefinementofmacromolecular
crystalstructures.ActacrystallographicaSectionD,Biologicalcrystallography67:355-367.
RichardsonSL,MaoY,ZhangG,HanjraP,PetersonDL,HuangR.2015.Kinetic
mechanismofproteinN-terminalmethyltransferase1.TheJournalofbiologicalchemistry290:11601-11610.
SchuttelkopfAW,vanAaltenDM.2004.PRODRG:atoolforhigh-throughput
crystallographyofprotein-ligandcomplexes.ActacrystallographicaSectionD,Biologicalcrystallography60:1355-1363.
WinnMD,BallardCC,CowtanKD,DodsonEJ,EmsleyP,EvansPR,KeeganRM,
KrissinelEB,LeslieAG,McCoyAetal.2011.OverviewoftheCCP4suiteand
currentdevelopments.ActacrystallographicaSectionD,Biologicalcrystallography67:235-242.
YangH,GuranovicV,DuttaS,FengZ,BermanHM,WestbrookJD.2004.Automated
andaccuratedepositionofstructuressolvedbyX-raydiffractiontothe
ProteinDataBank.ActacrystallographicaSectionD,Biologicalcrystallography60:1833-1839.
Supplementary Table 1 Data collection and refinement statistics
PDB$code$ 5E1B$ 5E1M$ 5E1O$ 5E1D$ 5E2B$ 5E2A$peptide$sequence$
SPKRIA$ PPKRIA$ RPKRIA$ YPKRIA$ (P0M)PKRIA$ (LSE)SPKRIA$
Data$collection$and$reduction$
$ $ $ $ $ $
Radiation$source$ APS$BEAMLINE$19EID$
Rigaku$FREE$ APS$BEAMLINE$24EIDEE$
APS$BEAMLINE$24EIDEE$
Rigaku$FREE$ rigaku$frEe$
Radiation$wavelength$[A]$
0.9793$ 1.5418$ 0.9792$ 0.9792$ 1.5418$ 1.5418$
Space$group$ P$65$2$2$ P$65$2$2$ P$65$2$2$ P$65$2$2$ P$65$2$2$ P$65$2$2$Cell$dimensions$a,b,c$[A],alpha,beta,gamma$[deg]$
107.3,107.3,205.4,90.00,90.00,120.00$
107.4,107.4,205.6,90.00,90.00,120.00$
107.5,107.5,206.4,90.00,90.00,120.00$
107.1,107.1,206.0,90.00,90.00,120.00$
107.3,107.3,205.6,90.00,90.00,120.00$
107.2,107.2,205.6,90.00,90.00,120.00$
Resolution$limits$[A]$
47.54E1.60(1.63E1.60)$
29.68E1.75(1.78E1.75)$
84.83E2.00(2.05E2.00)$
29.61E1.45(1.47E1.45)$
29.65E1.80(1.84E1.80)$
29.62E1.75(1.78E1.75)$
Unique$HKLs$ 92380(4488)$ 71201(3848)$ 48256(3461)$ 122141(5867)$
64736(3713)$ 70896(3828)$
Completeness$[%]$
100.0(100.0)$ 100.0(99.9)$ 99.9(99.7)$ 99.3(98.3)$ 99.2(98.0)$ 100.0(99.9)$
Rsym$ 0.134(1.213)$ 0.108(0.942)$ 0.171(0.880)$ 0.095(1.249)$ 0.130(1.180)$ 0.125(1.139)$I/sigma$ 21.7(3.2)$ 27.0(4.3)$ 23.0(5.0)$ 25.1(3.1)$ 27.7(3.6)$ 27.6(3.5)$Redundancy$ 21.7(21.8)$ 20.6(20.4)$ 21.5(22.1)$ 21.7(22.0)$ 21.1(21.1)$ 20.8(19.8)$Model$refinement$
$ $ $ $ $ $
Refinement$resolution$[A]$
50.01E1.65$ 50.01E1.75$ 84.81E2.00$ 30.00E1.45$ 29.65E1.95$ 29.60E1.75$
Reflections$used/free$
80997/3324$ 68505/2625$ 46342/1857$ 117420/4677$
49282/2019$ 68176/2626$
Number$of$atoms/average$BEfactor$[A**2]$
4368/17.5$ 4308/19.2$ 4221/21.9$ 4372/17.3$ 4288/19.3$ 4297/18.1$
$$Protein$ 3691/16.4$ 3673/18.3$ 3638/21.1$ 3741/16.4$ 3672/18.6$ 3657/17.2$$$Peptide$ 111/21.9$ 105/23.1$ 96/32.6$ 109/19.5$ 116/22.2$ 104/21.3$$$Water$ 436/25.0$ 417/26.0$ 387/28.3$ 389/25.3$ 385/24.8$ 426/24.8$$$Others$ 130/18.3$ 113/18.2$ 100/19.0$ 133/17.6$ 115/18.9$ 110/17.9$R$work/free$ 0.151/0.176$ 0.161/0.188$ 0.151/0.189$ 0.154/0.169$ 0.152/0.188$ 0.157/0.184$RMSD$bonds$[A]/angles$[deg]$
0.018/1.8$ 0.017/1.8$ 0.019/1.8$ 0.017/1.8$ 0.017/1.8$ 0.016/1.8$
Molprobity$Ramachandran$favored/outliers$[%]$
98.76/0.00$ 98.74/0.00$ 98.51/0.00$ 98.58/0.00$ 98.74/0.00$ 98.75/0.21$
$
Fig.%S1%Detailed(interac,ons(between(the(N3terminal(four(residues(of(the(RCC1(pep,de((purple(s,cks)(and(NTMT1((orange(s,cks(or(arcs).(Hydrophobic(interac,ons(of(NTMT1(residues(are(represented(by(orange(arcs,(hydrogen(bond(partners(by(orange(s,cks.(
A
C
B
D
Fig.%S2%%The(substrate(pep,des(bind(in(a(conserved(mode(to(NTMT1.(A:(Superposi,on(of(different(substrates((S/P/Y/RPKRIA)(in( the( electrosta,c( poten,al( surface( of(NTMT1.( The( first( residue( is( shown( in( s,ck(mode( and( colored( in( yellow,( orange,(magenta(and(cyan,(respec,vely.(SAH(is(shown(as(green(s,cks.(B3D:(Close3up(view(of(substrate(binding((P/Y/RPKRIA()(in(the(ac,ve(site.(In(addi,on(to(common(interac,ons,(P1(forms(hydrophobic(interac,on(with(W20((B),(Y1(and(R1(form(hydrogen3bonds(with(D180((C,(D).(
A B
Fig.% S3% Crystal( structures( of( NTMT13SAH3me13SPKRIA( and( NTMT13SAH3me13PPKRIA.( A:( Overlay( of( the(ac,ve(sites(of(NTMT13SAH3SPKRIA(and(NTMT13SAH3me13SPKRIA(complexes.(B:(Overlay(of(the(ac,ve(sites(of( NTMT13SAH3PPKRIA( and( NTMT13SAH3me13PPKRIA( complexes.( As( the( backbone( atoms( of( SAH( and(NTMT1(are(barely(changed,(only(the(substrates(are(overlaid(for(clarity.((
Fig.%S4%%Kine,c(analysis(of(NTMT1(with(different(pep,des(
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5
-8.00
-4.00
0.00
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
-16.00
-12.00
-8.00
-4.00
0.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
-1.00
-0.80
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0-12.00
-9.00
-6.00
-3.00
0.00-0.40
-0.30
-0.20
-0.10
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
-12.00
-9.00
-6.00
-3.00
0.00
-2.00
-1.50
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
YPKRIA
Kd1=4.1µM
Kd2=0.1µM
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
-12.00
-9.00
-6.00
-3.00
0.00
-2.00
-1.50
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0-12.00
-9.00
-6.00
-3.00
0.00
-0.80
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.012.00
9.00
6.00
3.00
0.00
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
LPKRIA
Kd=48µM
DPKRIA NB
SIKRIA
NB
SEKRIA
NB
SPKRIA Kd1=14µM Kd2=0.8µM
SSKRIA
NB
WPKRIA
Kd=47µM
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
-9.00
-6.00
-3.00
0.00
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
SQKRIA
NB
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
RPKRIA
Kd1=3.7µM
Kd2=0.3µM 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
-30.00
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
-1.50
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
PPKRIA
Kd1=189nM Kd2=2.8nM
Fig.%S5%%ITC(,tra,on(curves(of(NTMT1(with(different(pep,des(
PPKRIA + NTMT1 PPKRIA [M+H]+
[M+Me+H]+
[M+Na]+
[M+2Me]+
[M+H]+
[M+Na]+
[M+H]+
[M+Me+H]+
[M+Na]+
[M+H]+
[M+Na]+
SPKRIA + NTMT1 SPKRIA
Fig.%S6A%%MALDI(spectra(of((S/P)PKRIA(in(the(presence(or(absence(of(NTMT1((
[M+H]+
[M+Me+H]+
[M+Na]+
[M+H]+
[M+Na]+
YPKRIA + NTMT1 YPKRIA
[M+H]+
[M+Me+H]+
[M+Na]+
[M+H]+
[M+Na]+
RPKRIA + NTMT1 RPKRIA
Fig.%S6B%%MALDI(spectra(of((Y/R)PKRIA(in(the(presence(or(absence(of(NTMT1((
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5-4.00
-2.00
0.00
-1.00
-0.80
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5-4.00
-2.00
0.00
-1.00
-0.80
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
-16.00
-12.00
-8.00
-4.00
0.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
NTMT1-WT
Kd1=14µM Kd2=0.8µM
NTMT1-D180A
NB
NTMT1-D180K
NB
Fig.%S7%%ITC(,tra,on(curves(of(NTMT1(and(its(mutants(with(hRCC1(pep,de((SPKRIA)(
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0-4.00
-2.00
0.00
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130
Time (min)
µcal
/sec
Molar Ratio
KC
al/M
ole
of In
ject
ant
NTMT1-D177A
Kd=32µM
A
C
B
Fig.% S8% % %A( conserved( cataly,c( mechanism( for( different(substrates( (A3C,( P/Y/RPK)( of( NTMT1.( The( cataly,c( site( is(illustrated( in( the( same( way( as( in( Fig( 3D.( In( the( crystal(structures,(some(instances(of(W1(and(W2(are(occupied(by(glycerol( or( other( co3solutes.( For( discussion( of( the(proposed( mechanism,( we( labeled( the( co3solute( sites( as(waters.((