supplier evaluation and selection laura aiter cengiz Çokay güven gÜl
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Supplier Evaluation and Selection
Laura AITER
Cengiz ÇOKAY
Güven GÜL
![Page 2: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
Importance of Supplier Selection Supplier Selection Process Supplier Evaluation Criterias Supplier Evaluation Methods
– AHP– Other Methods
![Page 3: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Importance of Supplier Selection - 1
One of the most important processes performed in organizations today is the evaluation, selection and continuous measurement of suppliers.
Selecting a vendor is now as important a process as developing new products.
![Page 4: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Importance of Supplier Selection - 2
Supplier selection process is a multi-criteria problem, which includes both qualitative and quantitative factors.
Purchasing commands a significant position in most organizations sincepurchased parts, components, and supplies typically represent 40 to 60 percent of the sales of its end products.
Thus relatively small cost reductions gained in the acquisition of materials can have a greater impact on profits.
Suppliers have a large and direct impact on the cost, quality,technology, and time-to-market of new products.
![Page 5: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Importance of Supplier Selection - 3
Organization’s ability to produce a quality product at a reasonable cost and in a timely manner is heavily influenced by its suppliers’capabilities.
Supplier selection is one of the key issues of SCM because the cost of raw materials and component parts constitutes the main cost of a product Management.
A sound supplier selection decision today can reduce or prevent a host of problems tomorrow
![Page 6: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Supplier Selection Process
Steps in Supplier Selection Process
– Evaluating Needs and Defining Objectives– Gathering a Limited Pool of Vendors– Interviewing with Vendors– Selecting and Applying the Method
![Page 7: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Evaluating Needs and Defining Objectives
What need you are looking to satisfy?– Increase product quality
Which evaluation categories you will use? What are your business, technical and usability requirements? What are the must requirements?
– Max price, min performance, etc How will you score the requirements?
OUTCOME: list of requirements, objective and criterias toevaluate the vendors and the way to score different criterias
![Page 8: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Gathering a Limited Pool of Vendors
Evaluating all potential vendors takes much time
Basic screening and elimination due to lack of must requirements
OUTCOME: vendors pool
![Page 9: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Interviewing with Vendors
One by one interview with vendors Gap analysis between your requirements,
objectives and vendor properties Scoring each criteria
OUTCOME: criteria-score list for each vendor
![Page 10: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Selecting and Applying the Method
Select one among various methods– AHP, fuzzy logic method, etc
Calculate overall vendor score using selected method
Select the vendor with best score
![Page 11: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Supplier Evaluation Criterias
The evaluation criterias are fundamental to choose the best supplier. They are specific to each firm, because they vary according to the needs.
The criteria exposed in the following slides are the most common ones.*
Six categories of criteria selected
(*) We have analysed almost 30 texts in order to select the most common criterias
![Page 12: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Supplier Evaluation Criterias
The six classes for the suppliers’evaluation
measurement:
– FINANCIAL HEALTH– EXPERTISE– OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS– BUSINESS PROCESSES & PRACTICES– ENABLING BEHAVIORS OR CULTURAL FACTORS– RISK FACTORS
![Page 13: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Financial Health
In order to evaluate if a potential supplier is in good
financial position, a buyer can use indicators such as:– Sales– Profitability– Liquidity– ROI– Debt ratio– Transparency of finances
![Page 14: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Expertise
The purchasing department of the firm should choose its suppliers according to its capabilities:
– Network capabilities – Quality and production capabilities (dedicated
level?)– Technical level compared to sector average– Spread of technical creation– Investment in R&D
![Page 15: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Operational Performance
There are a large number of criteria in this category, such as:
– On-time delivery– Lead time– Responsiveness– Inventory management and control: reorder management,
forecasting capabilities…– Order acceptance, processing & fulfillement– Customer service– Preventive maintenance– Hours of operators training in Total Quality Control (TQC) or
JIT
![Page 16: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Business Processes and Practices
How does supplier provide a product or service at the
best value, on time and exactly as required from the
buyers?
Best practice and quality based information. This evaluation business can help get at the root causes of
supplier problems.
For example: is the quality standard of the products met by the production process (preventing defection) or by inspecting the quality of the products after production?
![Page 17: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Behaviors and Cultural factors
The evaluation criteria of such a category focus on the
long term sustainability of potential suppliers:
– What is the improvement culture of the supplier? Are his information capabilities always up-to-date?
– What is his intention of coordination?
![Page 18: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Risk Factors
A supplier’s risks are risks for the buyer. Indeed, if a supplier takes too much risk, it can have a great impact on his customer.
Risk factors can be uncovered in the previous criteria exposed, but also in criteria such as: trade relations, currency exchange, insurance, legislations.
![Page 19: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Criteria Selection
In reality, these mesures of supplier performance are difficult to obtain (financial publications, questionnaires, surveys, site visits).
Whichever criteria chosen, the assessment system must be optimal for good decision making.
Markov chain concept: the decision environment is dynamic, i.e. there must be interaction between the cooperation patterns and the supplier evaluation criteria.
![Page 20: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Analytic Hierarchy Process
For Complex Decisions raher than Correct Decision Mathematics and Human Psychology Government, Business, Industry, Healthcare, and Education. Decomposition of a problem into a hierarchy Evaluation of various elements comparing them to one another
in pairs A numerical weight or priority is derived for each element of the
hierarchy Thomas L. Saaty
![Page 21: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Ex. Complex Decision Situations
Deciding how best to reduce the impact of global climate change
Quantifying the overall quality of software systems (Microsoft Corporation)
Deciding where to locate offshore manufacturing plants(University of Cambridge)
Assessing risk in operating cross-country petroleum pipelines (American Society of Civil Engineers)
Deciding how best to manage U.S. Watersheds (U.S. Department of Agriculture)
Etc...
![Page 22: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
AHP Process
State the Objectives Define the Criteria Pick the Alternatives Establish Hierarchy Pairwise Comparison Synthesize Judgments Check Consistency Index Comparison between Criteria and Alternatives Calculate Final Rankings
![Page 23: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
AHP Process
Objective is to open an ice cream shop for young children and families. Establish Criteria
– Neighborhood– Visibility– Competition– Price
Identify Alternatives– Suburban Shopping Center– Main Business District– Suburban Mall Location
Example based on Decision By Objectives (How to convince others that you are
right)
By: Ernest Forman, DSc., George Washington University & Mary Ann Selly, Expert
Choice Inc.
![Page 24: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
AHP Process
Hierarchical Arrangement
![Page 25: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
AHP Process
Hierarchical Arrangement
![Page 26: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
AHP Process
Pairwise Comparison Matrix1- Equally preferred
2 - Equally to moderately preferred
3 - Moderately preferred
4 - Moderately to strongly preferred
5 - Strongly preferred
6 - Strongly to very strongly preferred
7 - Very Strongly preferred
9 - Extremely preferred
8 - Very Strongly to extremely preferred
![Page 27: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
AHP Process
– Synthesize Judgments– Check Consistency Index
![Page 28: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
AHP Process
Comparison between
Criteria and Alternatives
![Page 29: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
AHP Process
Recall Ranking for the Criteria Calculate Final Rankings
First choice: Shopping Center (59%)
Second choice: The Mall (32%)
Third choice: Main Street (9%)
![Page 30: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
AHP Major Benefits
Precise assessment of values through hierarchical structuring and pair-wise comparison.
Programmable on a computer. Value assessment, forecasting, alternative selection and
resource allocation. Widely accepted and applied by major business corporations
and government agencies world wide.
![Page 31: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
AHP Major Pitfalls
Human perception can distort pair-wise comparison. Hierarchy is one directional and it is difficult to
accommodate feedback. Values are highly aggregated and difficult to reflect
the degree of uncertainty.
![Page 32: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Other Analytic Vendor Selection Methods
![Page 33: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Pre-emptive Goal Programming
Wang, Huang, and Dismukes (2004) developed an integrated AHP and pre-emptive goal programming (PGP) methodology to take into account both qualitative and quantitative factors in supplier selection. While the AHP process matched product characteristics with supplier characteristics in order to qualitatively determine supply chain strategy, PGP mathematically determined the optimal order quantity from the chosen suppliers.
![Page 34: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Multi Objective Programming
Weber, Current,and Desai (2000) combined a multi-objective programming (MOP) and DEA method to provide buyers with a tool for negotiating with vendors that were not selected right away, as well as to evaluate potential suppliers.
![Page 35: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Linear Programming
Manufacturing supply chain design and evaluation GeWang · Samuel H. Huang · John P. Dismukes
Ghodsypour and O’Brien (1998) proposed an integration of an AHP and linear programming to consider both tangible and intangible factors in choosing the best suppliers and giving them optimal order quantities so that the total purchasing value is maximized.
![Page 36: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Fuzzy Set Theory
Morlacchi (1999) developed a model that combines the use of a fuzzy set with an AHP and implemented it in order to evaluate small suppliers in the engineering and machinery sectors.
![Page 37: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Questions
???
![Page 38: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Laura AITER Cengiz ÇOKAY Güven GÜL](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649d9c5503460f94a855ea/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Analytic Hierarchy Process
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a structured technique for helping people deal with complex decisions. Rather than prescribing a "correct" decision, the AHP helps people to determine one. Based on mathematics and human psychology, it was developed by Thomas L. Saaty in the 1970s and has been extensively studied and refined since then. The AHP provides a comprehensive and rational framework for structuring a problem, for representing and quantifying its elements, for relating those elements to overall goals, and for evaluating alternative solutions. It is used throughout the world in a wide variety of decision situations, in fields such as government, business, industry, healthcare, and education.
Several firms supply computer software to assist in applying the process. Users of the AHP first decompose their decision problem into a hierarchy of more easily comprehended
sub-problems, each of which can be analyzed independently. The elements of the hierarchy can relate to any aspect of the decision problem—tangible or intangible, carefully measured or roughly estimated, well- or poorly-understood—anything at all that applies to the decision at hand.
Once the hierarchy is built, the decision makers systematically evaluate its various elements, comparing them to one another in pairs. In making the comparisons, the decision makers can use concrete data about the elements, or they can use their judgments about the elements' relative meaning and importance. It is the essence of the AHP that human judgments, and not just the underlying information, can be used in performing the evaluations.
The AHP converts these evaluations to numerical values that can be processed and compared over the entire range of the problem. A numerical weight or priority is derived for each element of the hierarchy, allowing diverse and often incommensurable elements to be compared to one another in a rational and consistent way. This capability distinguishes the AHP from other decision making techniques.
In the final step of the process, numerical priorities are derived for each of the decision alternatives. Since these numbers represent the alternatives' relative ability to achieve the decision goal, they allow a straightforward consideration of the various courses of action.