supplier quality requirements (sqr) - l3 technologies · pdf filesupplier quality requirements...

Communication Systems - West

Supplier Quality

Requirements (SQR)

Approved by: Director, Supply Chain Management Manager Supplier Quality Director, Hardware Quality

Supplier Quality Requirements

DATE: 2/3/2015 Revision: 05 Document Number: SQR-001

of 32

TABLE of CONTENTS

SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Overview 3 1.2 Definition of key acronyms 4

SECTION 2 – MINIMUM SUPPLIER REQUIREMENTS 5 2.1 Quality Management System (QMS) Requirements 5 2.2 Nonconforming Material Control 6 2.3 Product Release 8 2.4 Records 9 2.5 Shipping Documentation Requirements 9 2.6 Nondestructive Test (NDT) Procedure/Technique Submittal Requirements 13 2.7 Corrective and Preventive Action 13 2.8 Key Characteristics 14 2.9 Foreign Object Debris/Damage (FOD) 14 2.10 Supplier Sub-tier Control 14 2.11 Incorporation of Commercial Product 14 2.12 Sampling 14 2.13 Material/Process Requirements 15 2.14 Workmanship and Specification Requirements 15 2.15 Lead Free Mitigation 16 2.16 Electro-Static Discharge Control 18 2.17 Calibration System, Measuring and Test Equipment 18 2.18 Packaging, Preservation, and Storage 19 2.19 Counterfeit Parts Avoidance and Substitution Control Plan 19 2.20 Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) 21 2.21 Traceability Requirements 21

SECTION 3 – COMMODITY SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 22 3.1 Supplier First Article Inspection (FAI) Requirements 23 3.2 Part Marking Requirements 25 3.3 Special Process Requirements 26 3.4 Tooling Requirements 27 3.6 Castings & Forgings 27 3.7 Kits 28 3.8 Software Control 28

SECTION 4 – GENERAL INFORMATION 29 Specifications and Standards 31 L-3 CSW Forms 31 Revision Record 32

Table 1: Quality Management System Requirements ................................................................ 6 Table 2: Standard Quality Requirements Matrix by SQR Commodity Designator .....................22 Table 3: SQR Commodity Designator Definitions .....................................................................29



of 32

SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION To assure L-3 Communications, Communication Systems West (CSW) and its suppliers remain competitive in the global marketplace, we must produce, deliver, and continually improve safe, reliable products that meet or exceed customer, statutory, and regulatory requirements. In order to meet these objectives we are instituting the following Supplier Quality Requirements (SQR). Terms and Definitions: Communication Systems-West is hereinafter referred to as “CSW” and the supplier is hereinafter referred to as the “Supplier.” The words “shall” and “must” express mandatory requirements. The word “should” expresses a recommendation or advice on implementing such a requirement. CSW encourages such recommendations or best practices to be followed. The word “may” expresses a permissible practice or action. The word “will” expresses a provision or intention in connection with a requirement.

This SQR document is the Suppliers’ guide to understanding CSW quality requirements and expectations. This document forms a part of the CSW purchase order, unless otherwise specified herein. It contains general information and specific CSW quality requirements that must be met by our suppliers. Where there is a conflict between the SQR and the purchase order, contract, engineering drawings, specifications, and/or Statement of Work, the documents previously mentioned shall have precedence over this SQR. 1.1 Overview This SQR has four major sections:

Section 1 - This section identifies key information and requirements applicable on all CSW purchase orders or change orders. Section 2 - This section includes minimum quality requirements required for all deliverable products and services procured by CSW unless otherwise specified in the drawing, contract, or Statement of Work. Section 3 - This section includes commodity-unique quality requirements that may be applicable to the Supplier’s deliverable product. Supplier is guided to these requirements using the commodity-based matrix shown in Table 2. Section 4 - This section provides useful general information and tables referenced in this document that are associated with the purchase order and related quality subjects.

This document is applicable to all CSW purchase orders for the procurement, production, overhaul, and modification of contract deliverables including tooling, ground support equipment, and repairs.



of 32

Tables 1 and 2 contain matrices that are the key to determining the applicability of CSW Quality requirements and will be used by the supplier as part of their Quality planning function to ensure compliance with the CSW requirements. This information is a road map to the requirements for production and delivery of product. Please consult your Buyer if you have difficulty in locating this key information. Questions regarding this document should be directed to your CSW Buyer.

1.2 Definition of key acronyms

COTS: Commercial (Available) Off the Shelf.

Means any item or supply (including construction material) other than real property that is of a type customarily used by the general public or by non-governmental entities for purposes other than governmental purposes. The item has been sold, leased, or licensed to the general public; or has been offered for sale, lease, or license to the general public. Quality Management System (QMS): business system consisting of all the parts and components of an organization dealing with the quality of processes and products. The managing structure, responsibilities, procedures, processes, and resources to effectively achieve the quality and overall objectives of an organization, in order to satisfy customer needs and expectations.

NADCAP: National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program

FRACAS: Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System 1.3 Web Access CSW has established a web page on the Internet to provide suppliers a quick on-line link to this SQR document. The document is available at www.l-3com.com/csw/docs/general/. CSW Contract Terms and Conditions information associated with the purchase order requirements is available at www.l-3com.com/csw/docs/general/. CSW’s Workmanship Standards can be found at www2.l-3com.com/csw/docs/wsm.

http://www.l-3com.com/csw/docs/general/


http://www2.l-3com.com/csw/docs/wsm



of 32

SECTION 2 – MINIMUM SUPPLIER REQUIREMENTS 2.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS The requirements in this section apply to all procurements. CSW and its customers expect our suppliers to deliver material that is fully compliant with all contracted requirements including those of the Purchase Order (PO). If the supplier has difficulty with quality or technical issues encountered during the manufacturing process, or with the contractual requirements of the PO, a Change or Information Request (CIR), CSW Form SLC-9012 can be initiated by the supplier to request assistance. CIRs are not to be used to disposition, or request disposition, of nonconforming material. Note: CIR Forms can be obtained from your Buyer. 2.1 Quality Management System (QMS) Requirements Supplier shall implement and maintain a QMS which complies with the applicable QMS standard or specification listed in Table 1. Any deviations to this must be approved by Supplier Quality, to include a mitigation plan. If the Supplier is registered to the referenced standard or specification listed in Table 1, the Supplier shall notify their assigned CSW Supplier Quality Engineer or Buyer of said registration, which can be verified in the IAQG OASIS database. Any changes to the registration such as a change of the certification/registration body, update, withdrawal, or disapproval must be forwarded to the CSW Supplier Quality Engineer and/or Buyer immediately for update to CSW’s Approved Supplier database. Initial and subsequent periodic review of supplier’s QMS may be performed at the option of CSW. Objective evidence of Supplier’s compliance, either by submittal of requested evidence or evidence of a third party accreditation, may be acceptable for the purpose of re-survey, but will not preclude the use of on-site evaluations or other review methods if necessary. A change in supplier name, ownership, or facility location will subject the supplier’s Quality System to reevaluation by CSW. The supplier shall notify their buyer of any of these aforementioned changes in writing within 30 days prior to the change occurring. The Buyer will instruct the supplier to submit a Change or Information Request (CIR) form SLC-9012. The supplier shall provide notice to their CSW Buyer of any major changes in key personnel, organizational structure or manufacturing processes affecting quality and/or any major findings uncovered during their registrar’s periodic audits within seven business days. Corrective and preventive actions taken in response to those major findings shall also be provided to your Supplier Quality Engineer or Buyer.



of 32

Table 1: Quality Management System Requirements

QMS Level Acceptable QMS Product/Service

Level 1 AS9100 Registration Manufacturer with Design Authority (Not COTS)

Level 2 AS9100 Compliant, Registration Preferred Build to Print

Value Added Distributor

Level 3

AS9003 or ISO 9001:2008 or AS9100

Compliant, Registration Preferred Inspection and Test Services

AS9120 Compliant, Registration Preferred Pass Thru Distributor

Level 4 As specified by contract or Purchase Order Services

Level5 As specified by contract or Purchase Order Catalog Items

2.2 Nonconforming Material Control The Seller shall maintain a documented system for controlling nonconforming material. Nonconforming material must be identified, documented, evaluated, segregated (where practical), and dispositioned to prevent its unintended release or use. a) Disposition Authority of CSW/Customer Designed Items The supplier’s disposition authority of nonconforming product/material is limited to: rework to specification, return to supplier, and scrap. These terms are defined as follows:

1. Rework to Specifications- Restore material to specification compliance in accordance with required process(es) and addressed by governing process specification(s). Parts subject to subsequent processing not authorized by specification shall be submitted to CSW’s Material Review Board (MRB) for disposition. Specific rework instructions shall be provided with rework dispositions.

2. Return To Supplier - Return of product found to be discrepant for subsequent rework or replacement.

3. Scrap - Permanent removal from production and destruction of product found to be unfit for use. Scrapped product shall be controlled until destroyed. When CSW’s Material Review Board has dispositioned material as “Scrap,” the material shall be physically rendered unusable within three business days of supplier’s receiving notification of such, unless an alternate disposition is requested. Supplier may not scrap CSW supplied product or material without authorization from the CSW Buyer.

4. All other dispositions of nonconforming material shall be submitted to the CSW MRB using the Supplier Non-Conformance Request (SNR), CSW form SLC-3892. Note:



of 32

Form can be obtained from your Buyer or your Supplier Quality Engineer. Any MRB performed on this form may require the supplier to reimburse CSW for the costs associated with processing the SNR.

b) MRB Dispositions for Supplier Designed Hardware Suppliers of product that retain design authority to a Source/Specification Control Drawing (SCD) or Critical Item Development Specification (CIDS) and are ISO9001 or AS9100 certified may use dispositions of use-as-is or repair provided:

1. The MRB process has been approved by L-3 CSW, and 2. The nonconformance does not affect form, fit, function, weight, interchangeability,

maintainability, reliability, unique key characteristics, safety, or customer specified requirements. These non conformances shall be submitted to the CSW MRB.

These above requirements apply to those suppliers that produce products of proprietary design, and products to military and industry standards. Copies of all MRB dispositions shall be included in the supplier’s document package. CSW reserves the right to perform an audit of the supplier’s MRB process even though they may have design authority to a Source/Specification Control Drawing (SCD) or Critical Item Development Specification (CIDS). c) Suppliers do not have MRB authority for CSW or any of its customers’ designed items unless specifically authorized in writing by CSW Product Assurance, as provided through the CSW Buyer.* d) Notification/Disclosures The supplier’s system shall provide for timely reporting of nonconformities that may affect already delivered product. Notification to the Buyer and Supplier Quality Engineer shall be submitted on company letterhead and include: 1) a clear description of the discrepancy, 2) identification of all suspect parts (to include CSW part numbers, purchase order numbers and item numbers, serial numbers, manufacturing dates, quantities, etc.), 3) material affected by the deficiency, 4) date(s) delivered, 5) any information relating to the Root Cause/Corrective Action steps initiated to address the defective condition, and 6) preventive measures taken to preclude recurrence of the process failure. Modifications of a disclosure (additions or deletions of data) requiring subsequent issuances shall be revision controlled to provide definitive sequencing (i.e., Rev 'A,' 'B,' etc.). For suppliers with Design Authority, a technical assessment and recommended disposition shall be provided. e) Marking Requirements for Rejections If the supplier is allowed to ship nonconforming material, then the supplier shall tag the discrepant material with the Supplier Nonconformance Report (SNR) document number. This is only allowed through written direction by the CSW Buyer.



of 32

2.3 Product Release CSW, its customer, and/or their authorized inspection agency or regulatory authorities shall have the right to send representatives to the Supplier’s facilities on a non-interference basis to determine purchase order compliance. Compliance may be determined by monitoring, witnessing, and/or performing such activities as inspections, test witness, or other system, process, and/or product evaluations and verifications as necessary to determine product acceptability to contractual requirements. The type, necessity, and degree of demonstration of conformance will be at the sole discretion of CSW, taking into consideration such factors as product complexity, the environment where the product is used, the ability to determine product quality after receipt, and past supplier performance. Without additional charges, the supplier and/or their subcontractor shall make their facility and applicable records available for these activities and provide all reasonable support for the safety and convenience of these representatives during their stay at the supplier’s and/or their subcontractor’s plants and facilities. Supplier shall make every effort, when possible, to provide CSW’s Field Representative with Internet access by the use of direct telephone line, ISDN, DSL, or high speed via supplier’s network. CSW inspection requirements are stated in the purchase order. CSW Inspection Types: a) Receiving Inspection at Buyer’s Facility Deliverable product(s) are subject to CSW inspection upon receipt at CSW’s facility. b) Government Source Inspection Deliverable products are subject to Government oversight during the performance of the purchase order prior to shipment. c) Government Surveillance The U.S. Government reserves the right to perform surveillance of a supplier’s quality and/or manufacturing operation during the performance of the Purchase Order. d) CSW Source Inspection Deliverable product(s) are subject to CSW source inspection. Unless otherwise specified in the contract, the supplier shall notify their CSW Buyer and Supplier Quality at least ten business days in advance of scheduled “in process” or “final” source inspection date. Source inspection can be imposed by Supplier Quality if deemed necessary. All shipping documentation and documentation provided to show evidence of conformity to purchase order and SQR requirements shall be made available at the time of source inspection. Note: Verifications accomplished by CSW or its customer shall neither be used as evidence of effective control of quality by the supplier nor shall they preclude subsequent rejection by CSW or its customer.



of 32

2.4 Records Seller shall retain all required records as objective evidence of conformance to Purchase Order requirements, including Seller’s records and certifications of the inspection and test performed in the course of procurement, manufacturing, testing, processing, inspecting, preserving, packaging and shipping product(s) on the purchase order. Seller shall make records available to Buyer upon request within three business days and at no additional cost. a) Control The supplier shall maintain a documented procedure for record creation, change (handwritten or other), completion, and control of records in accordance with the applicable QMS standard (i.e. AS9100). Note: Electronic records have the same requirements, control, and retention as paper records. They must also be capable of maintaining data integrity for the retention period. b) Retention Unless otherwise stated in the PO, records shall be retained for a period of not less than six (6) years, or in accordance with FAR 4.7, whichever is longer. The supplier must impose this requirement on their sub-tier suppliers. Records shall include, but not be limited to:

Component assembly and test procedures and plans

Assembly/manufacturing records/travelers

Evidence of inspection to assure adherence to applicable drawings or specifications and revisions

First Article Inspection report

Test reports

Periodic inspection and control of inspection media

Records to indicate control of special tooling and special test equipment

Test data records of all qualification and acceptance tests performed

Certification of personnel as required by specification and/or contract

Raw material and process certifications

Discrepancy/material review reports

“As built” bills of material for each component

Part and material procurement information to maintain traceability

2.5 Shipping Documentation Requirements a) Packing Slips Supplier shall provide a packing sheet or attachments for each separate shipment with the following minimum requirements:

1. Supplier’s company name and address. Note: The manufacturing/shipping address that has been surveyed and approved by CSW for the supplier code listed on the purchase order must be noted on the packing slip or certification.

2. Purchase order, part, and serial numbers. CSW and Supplier dispositioned nonconformance document number(s), as applicable.

3. Required parts traceability forms associated with Section 3.5.



of 32

4. Evidence of CSW and/or Government source inspection acceptance when applicable. (Form SLC-2525 Note: This form can be obtained from your Buyer or your Supplier Quality Engineer.)

5. Certificate of Conformance Suppliers will provide a Certificate of Conformance (C of C) assuring that all work conforms to the requirements of the purchase order. The C of C may be a separate document or included on the packing sheet. The supplier’s Quality Representative or authorized delegate must sign and/or stamp this document (an electronic signature is acceptable). The C of C will accompany each shipment on the PO and where applicable, certify the following:

Part and Serial Number as applicable

Material content

Mechanical properties

Physical properties

Chemical properties/characteristics

Electrical properties

Finish

Special processes

NDT inspections

Welding

Test and Inspection

b) CSW Acceptance of Manufacturing Lots If CSW source inspection is required, CSW and/or Supplier may arrange the source inspection of completed manufacturing lots in lieu of source inspection prior to each partial shipment. When this option is selected, the CSW Supplier Quality Engineer, through the Buyer, will issue the supplier a letter certifying source inspection acceptance of the accepted lot. This letter is the only document that will confirm CSW acceptance when utilized. The original letter shall be maintained by the supplier and a photocopy submitted with each partial shipment of the CSW accepted lot. Any changes in drawing revision, build configuration, damage to the part, or quality rejection after acceptance by CSW will require re-accomplishment of the source inspection. Delivered quantities shall not exceed the purchase order quantity. Supplier shall record the letter number on their packing sheet for cross-reference purposes. Note: Parts processed through CSW MRB, or requiring Government source inspection, are excluded from paragraph 2.5b. c) Suppliers of Age-Sensitive Materials Supplier shall provide purchase order number, part number, original manufacturing/cure date, lot number(s), and the shelf life expiration date (if indefinite or unlimited, so state). The supplier shall physically identify the shelf life expiration date on the deliverable product or the unit packaging according to the applicable standard.



of 32

In addition, forward any special storage/handling instructions. Supplier is responsible to determine if acceptance test report submittal is required in accordance with applicable material specification. Elastomeric material with “No Shelf Life” requirement or “Unlimited Shelf Life” shall be marked as such. Note: Age sensitive material must have a minimum of 75% of its useful shelf life when received at CSW. d) Hazardous Chemicals The Supplier shall provide the appropriate Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) with each shipment of Hazardous Chemicals. Immediately following an MSDS update, the Supplier will provide an updated MSDS to the Buyer and to CSW’s Safety and Health Department. The shelf life of the hazardous chemical must also be identified. e) Microelectronics Suppliers of microelectronics shall clearly mark the outside of the shipping container with the following note: “Microelectronics Materials. Do Not Open. Send Directly to CSW Supplier Quality for Hybrid Lab Processing.” f) Rework/Repair/Replacement/Modified Items Supplier’s Certification of Conformance shall indicate the action taken on the item(s) returned to supplier for rework, replacement, repair or modification, including work performed by Supplier at CSW’s facility.

1. The item(s) have been reworked, repaired, replaced, or modified (as applicable), in accordance with respective nonconformance documents or Purchase Order.

2. The supplier shall certify whether the item meets the configuration requirements of the

applicable engineering documents, and the qualification status of the item. Any nonconformance to these issues may require a deviation/waiver.

3. All applicable nonconformance document numbers or other references to ensure

traceability must be included.

4. Supplier shall provide a detailed copy of the associated work order and final inspection results with the return of the items. For repairs, the supplier shall also provide a detailed failure report stating root cause and what steps were accomplished to correct the failure with the returned item.

Note: Discrepant material shall not be shipped to CSW without prior approval from the CSW Material Review Board (MRB).



of 32

g) Qualification Certification When CSW’s drawing, procurement specification, statement of work and/or purchase order requires deliverable items to be “qualified,” suppliers shall certify that materials, parts, assemblies and/or related contract “data items” have been approved and all components of a deliverable item have been inspected and/or tested to applicable Acceptance Test Procedures (ATP) and/or specification/control drawings (both CSW and Supplier originated). In addition to section “a” above, certification shall indicate revision level of engineering drawings, specifications, and applicable design/specification changes as stated in the purchase order. Only authorized CSW Engineering written consent, provided through the CSW Buyer shall allow end items to be delivered prior to completion of qualification testing. Authorization for delivery does not constitute CSW final acceptance. (Reference Change or Information Request (CIR), Form SLC-9012 – see paragraph 2.0.) Note: Form can be obtained from your Buyer or your Supplier Quality Engineer. h) Material/Process Certifications Metallic raw material suppliers/distributors (ref: SQR Commodity Designator “A”) shall include a copy of the original mill certification and any required secondary independent test laboratory certification(s) with the shipment of deliverable material. In addition, material must meet any other contractual requirements as stated in the Purchase Order. i) Distributors of Standard Parts/Hardware The Supplier shall supply with each shipment catalog pages, specifications, and/or data sheets which clearly define and identify the item, manufacturer, dimensional and/or electrical characteristics, etc. The Distributor (a Seller other than the Manufacturer) shall certify that the articles delivered under this Purchase Order conform to the applicable requirements of Buyer’s or Manufacturer’s specifications for the article ordered. The Distributor certification of conformance shall include the following information:

1. The original manufacturer a. Seller shall identify source if different than original manufacturer.

2. Part number 3. Applicable traceability information (date lot code, etc.) 4. Results of testing or special inspection, as required. 5. Dated signature of authorized Seller Representative 6. Items identified by Buyer number shall have complete information as to the original manufacturer and original manufacturer's part number

j) Rubber Products Rubber products shall be identified by cure date as required by the drawing and/or applicable specifications supplied with or referenced in the purchase order. Age sensitive products shall meet the requirements for age sensitive materials contained in Section 2.5, c. k) Product Calibration



of 32

For items requiring calibration, a certification document verifying that the parts on this purchase order have been calibrated shall accompany each shipment. Supplier shall maintain a copy of this document in accordance with the Records retention requirements, and the copy shall be made available to CSW upon request. 2.6 Nondestructive Test (NDT) Procedure/Technique Submittal Requirements Submittal to and approval of NDT general procedures and part-specific techniques by CSW Standards Engineering is required prior to performing NDT. After initial approval, any changes to subject documents must be resubmitted to CSW for approval. Suppliers using outside sources for NDT shall ensure that the selected NDT sub-tier has CSW approval for the NDT procedure/technique used. On-site validation of procedures/techniques to verify specification compliance may be performed at the discretion of CSW. 2.7 Corrective and Preventive Action a) General Supplier shall maintain a documented system for determining root causes of documented defects and obtaining corrective action and preventive action both internally and from its suppliers. The supplier is accountable for effectiveness of corrective and preventive actions taken. Buyer requests for corrective and preventive action will be issued to the supplier’s representative in the form of, but not limited to,

Supplier Corrective Action Request (SCAR),

Failure analysis reporting when required by engineering specification, or

Contract data items requirements. b) Corrective Action Response Extensions CSW may grant the supplier an extension for their corrective action response on a case-by-case basis. Suppliers may formally request a time extension at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the assigned corrective action closure date. Requests must be in writing with adequate justification documenting the status of the investigation, revised corrective action completion date and a listing of previous actions taken toward implementation of effective preventative action, as applicable. c) Verification of Corrective Action (VCA) CSW retains the right to conduct corrective action verification at the supplier and supplier’s sub-tier supplier’s facility to assess effectiveness of implemented corrective action. Note: Material currently undergoing corrective action investigation processing up to and including verification of corrective action shall not be shipped without the written authorization of CSW Supplier Quality.



of 32

2.8 Key Characteristics When CSW drawing, specification, and/or purchase order includes “key characteristic” requirements, the supplier shall employ a Process Variability Reduction/Statistical Process Control (VR/SPC) program compliant with AS9103, Variation Management of Key Characteristics. VR/SPC related records shall be retained at supplier’s facility and provided to CSW’s representative, upon request, for compliance review. 2.9 Foreign Object Debris/Damage (FOD) To preclude introduction of foreign objects into any deliverable item, Supplier shall practice good housekeeping, and maintain and comply with a documented Foreign Object Debris/Damage (FOD) prevention program. This program shall follow NAS 412 as a guide. Supplier shall employ appropriate housekeeping practices to assure timely and complete removal of all residue/debris generated during manufacturing operations or tasks. 2.10 Supplier Sub-tier Control Supplier is responsible for ensuring the following:

All items procured from its subcontractors conform to all requirements of the CSW purchase order

All applicable provisions of this document are flowed to its subcontractors including copies of the latest process specification revision(s).

Specifying on their purchase order for special processes “CSW” as your customer and the latest process specification revision(s).

Sub-tier supplier quality systems shall be compliant to the requirements of Table 1. Special process and service suppliers must be compliant with the applicable quality system specified in Table 1, Level 3. Supplier shall evaluate any sub-tier supplier who cannot comply with the requirements of this document and notify CSW in writing. On a case-by-case basis, a written mitigation plan may be developed outlining what measures the sub-tier supplier is taking to meet these requirements. This mitigation plan must be submitted to and accepted by the supplier, and available to CSW for review. Non-compliance to these requirements may exclude the sub-tier supplier from participation on specific programs. All sub-tier suppliers are also required to utilize AS9102 (or equivalent) for their First Article Inspection when required per Table 2, Standard Quality Requirements Matrix by SQR Commodity Designator. 2.11 Incorporation of Commercial Product When incorporating commercial product into a proposed system/assembly, the Supplier shall ensure technical, design and construction requirements are satisfied. 2.12 Sampling Supplier may use sampling plans provided the sampling plans are in accordance with applicable military or government standards. The supplier is responsible to verify the quality of all items delivered to CSW. When the supplier elects to use statistical methods for the acceptance of products or processes, such methods shall be in compliance with the requirements established



of 32

by ANSI/ASQC Z 1.4, ANSI/ASQ Z 1.9, Mil-Std-1916 or ARP9013 except that in all cases the sample sizes shall be AQL 1.0 or higher (i.e., AQL .65, .40, etc.) and the criteria for lot acceptance as zero (i.e., C=0). A copy of Supplier’s statistical process control plan shall be furnished to CSW upon request. 2.13 Material/Process Requirements Supplier shall maintain a copy of all supplier-procured raw material certifications, which must be readily retrievable and shall include material specification, dimension description, alloy and condition. The supplier shall maintain the original mill certification and any secondary independent test laboratory certification(s) if any additional process was done after original mill certification for procured metallic material that shall include physical properties, chemical analysis and lot number(s). In addition, material must meet any other contractual requirements as stated in the purchase order. Supplier shall maintain copies of certifications for all subcontracted special processes per the requirements in Section 2.4, Records. Supplier shall also flow down a requirement for their sub-tiers to obtain and maintain raw material and process certifications. No submittal is required unless specifically required per purchase order or other requirement herein. Supplier’s material/special process and sub-tier supplier/processor certifications and test results shall be made available upon request. When the supplier shows evidence that CSW provided consigned material for use by the supplier, a material certification is not required. Metallic raw material suppliers/distributors shall periodically validate selected physical and/or chemical properties documented on mill certification test reports (other than hardness and conductivity) in accordance with internally established requirements for all metallic raw materials. Such validation will be documented and retained for record purposes and will be provided to the buyer when requested. 2.14 Workmanship and Specification Requirements 2.14.1 Workmanship and Specifications Manual The CSW Workmanship and Specifications Manual is applicable to all CSW procurements unless otherwise specified in the Purchase Order, Drawing, or Subcontractor Statement of Work. The only exception to this requirement are Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) parts purchased on a CSW Vendor Item Control drawing, or other parts with a CSW approved Assertion of Commerciality form (SLC-9018). The Manual may be identified as the Workmanship and Specifications Manual, WSM-01, WSM, or S01. It invokes CSW Workmanship Standards (WS-XXX), Internal Specifications (IS-XXX), and Specification 60083155 (Torque and Retention Requirements for Threaded Hardware), establishing design, manufacturing, and acceptance requirements. The manual may be accessed at www.l-3com.com/csw/docs/wsm

http://www.l-3com.com/csw/docs/wsm



of 32

2.14.2 Circuit Card Assemblies The supplier’s circuit card assembly (CCA) design and workmanship shall be in compliance with the most recent IPC-2220 series for printed circuit board design and IPC-A-610 Class 3 acceptability specifications. Manufacturing methods shall be in accordance with the current revision of J-STD-001 Class 3. Rigid and flex circuit card assemblies shall meet the requirements of the specified standards as applicable to specific board type. Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs), including rigid, rigid flex, flex and high density boards shall meet performance requirements specified in the current revisions of the IPC-6010 series as well as the acceptability requirements for IPC-600 class 3. Exceptions to Class 3 specifications must be approved in writing and the following minimum requirements must be maintained for critical features within the PCB design:

1. Minimum annular ring for supported hole: a. External layers .002 preferred, tangency allowed. b. Internal layers .001 preferred, tangency allowed.

2. Solder mask per IPC-SM-840 Class 3.

3. Copper through hole plating thickness average of .001” with a minimum thickness of

.0008”.

4. Solderability shall be in accordance to Category 3, J-STD-003.

Suppliers must have inspectors certified to IPC-A-600 and the ability to validate PCB compliance including micro section evaluation. This process can also be accomplished by using a CSW approved third party test lab. 2.14.3 Cable and Harness Assemblies Suppliers of cables and harnesses’ design and workmanship criteria shall be in compliance with IPC-620 Class 3 acceptability requirements unless otherwise stated. 2.15 Lead Free Mitigation This section establishes CSW’s position on the use of lead (Pb)-free tin in our products. CSW has analyzed the European Union’s WEEE and RoHS directives as they relate to materials used in our products. Because of these directives, many companies are eliminating lead (Pb) from their products. The following summarizes what CSW generally considers acceptable and unacceptable:

• Pb-free tin finishes and solders are not acceptable (see Section 2.14.2). • CSW’s definition of Pb-free tin is any tin-based alloy that does not contain at least 3%

lead (Pb) by weight. • Bright tin finish is not to be used on products supplied to CSW. • The only tin finishes which may be approved by CSW are “matte” tin in accordance with

ASTM B545, “Standard Specification for Electrodeposited Coatings of Tin.” • CSW will continue to use Pb-based solders and avoid Pb-free tin finishes and solders in

accordance with USAF Airworthiness Advisory AA-05-01, “Lead-Free Solder.”



of 32

• This position statement does not modify any CSW technical requirements incorporated either directly or by reference in purchase orders awarded by CSW.

• When changes in product provided to CSW are planned that would incorporate unacceptable materials, suppliers are required to inform CSW in writing regarding:

o Specifics of the change including technical rationale o Implementation schedule o Transition plan.

2.15.1 Lead Finish The use of lead (Pb+) finish components is required unless otherwise authorized by the contract (SOW), drawing or parts list. The supplier is responsible to characterize their manufacturing build process with emphasis on the compatibility of reflow profile and CCA (components/pcb). Should components with leaded (Pb+) and lead free solder be mixed within a single CCA (mixed technology), characterization shall include cross section analysis to ensure complete mixing within the BGAs (ball grid arrays) and other solder joints and the proper formation of inter-metallics. 2.15.2 Lead Free The Supplier shall provide a Lead Free Control Plan (LFCP) in accordance with GEIA-STD-0005-1 and GEIA-STD-0005-2. The LFCP shall describe policy for managing the transition of components from leaded (Pb+) to lead-free termination finish. The LFCP shall contain or reference policies, procedures, work instructions, etc. that demonstrate proactive, quality management of the introduction of lead-free solder in our supply chain. The Supplier shall actively employ measures to mitigate the effects of the commercial industry migration to lead-free parts. CSW complies with Level 2B requirements of GEIA-STD-0005-2 (Standard for Mitigating the Effects of Tin Whiskers in Aerospace and High Performance Electronic Systems). Suppliers are expected to comply to GEIA-STD-0005-2 Level 2B or above (above meaning risk due to the introduction of lead-free products is further reduced, e.g., Level 3 implies lead-free solder is not allowed). Suppliers shall submit a copy of their LFCP for CSW review. 2.15.3 X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) All CCA components purchased for CSW products are recommended to undergo XRF (x-ray fluorescence) analysis to accurately determine component lead finish. In most cases, if the proper XRF equipment is utilized, XRF can provide composition and thickness determinations. XRF is mandatory for all BGAs and bottom termination components. Suppliers shall ensure that proper processing parameters and proper material controls take place to ensure reliability and a robust process. a) If Supplier is manufacturing using a mixed technology process, the Supplier shall verify the

correct thermal profile. Correct thermal profile means that the CCA is processed using the appropriate time, temperatures, ramp rates and dwell times during reflow to ensure the lead-free BGA solder is properly mixed (cross-section microscopy) with the leaded solder and upon completion of assembly, the components and CCA pass IPC-610, Class 3 requirements.



of 32

b) If the Supplier is manufacturing using a pure lead (Pb+) process and the component received is available using lead-free solder only, the BGA and/or component shall be re-balled or re-tinned respectively. If re-tinning takes place, it shall be per GEIA-STD-0006: “Requirements for Using Solder Dip to Replace the Finish on Electronic Piece Parts.” Reballing shall take place at a reputable industry recognized company that provides re-balling services.

c) Correspondingly, if only leaded component solders are available, and the Supplier is running

a purely lead-free process, the BGA or component must undergo reballing or re-tinning, respectively. If re-tinning takes place, it shall be per GEIA-STD-0006, “Requirements for Using Solder Dip to Replace the Finish on Electronic Piece Parts.” Reballing shall take place at a reputable industry recognized company that provides re-balling services.

2.15.4 Flux Type The use of a rosin based flux meeting the requirements of J-STD-004, ROL0 (approximate equivalent of Type R flux) or ROL1(approximate equivalent of Type RMA flux) is required on all CCAs listed in the SOW, along with the applicable wash process. Note: ROL1 flux contains a small amount of additional activator to enhance cleaning and deoxidation, leaving only a minimum amount of inert residue behind. A characteristic of ROL1 fluxes is that the remaining residue be noncorrosive, tack free, and exhibit a high degree of freedom from ionic contamination after cleaning. ‘No clean’ flux cannot be used due to the adverse impact on the radio frequency (RF) designs. ‘Water soluble’ flux is considered high risk because several hand installed components cannot be processed through an automated wash line. 2.16 Electro-Static Discharge Control Suppliers that handle ESD sensitive items shall have an Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) control program in effect to protect parts during manufacturing, inspection/test, packaging, shipping, rework, and/or failure analysis. The ESD control program shall conform to ANSI/ESD 20:20. Packaging shall conform to the requirements of MIL-PRF-81705 and must be marked with the MIL-STD-129N ESD caution label, “CAUTION - OBSERVE PRECAUTIONS FOR HANDLING ELECTROSTATIC SENSITIVE ITEMS” The packaging shall be marked to assure static awareness upon receipt at CSW. 2.17 Calibration System, Measuring and Test Equipment The supplier shall provide and maintain gages and other measuring and testing devices necessary to assure that product(s) conform to the technical requirements. In order to assure continued accuracy, these devices shall be calibrated at established intervals against certified standards traceable to national or international standards. If production tooling such as jigs, fixtures, templates, and patterns are used as a media of inspection, such devices shall also be proved for accuracy at established intervals. Calibration of inspection equipment shall be in accordance with a nationally or internationally recognized standard (i.e. ISO 17025, ANSI NCSL Z540 or ISO 10012) to the extent necessary to maintain required levels of accuracy and is subject to the buyer’s approval. When required,



of 32

the supplier’s measuring and test equipment shall be made available for use by the CSW representative to determine conformance of product(s) with purchase order requirements. In addition, if conditions warrant, supplier’s personnel shall be made available for operation of such devices and for verification of their accuracy and condition. (Control of tooling and M&TE furnished by the buyer shall be the responsibility of the seller.) 2.18 Packaging, Preservation, and Storage The Supplier shall control all preservation, packing, storage, shipping and handling to assure that all materials are adequately protected during all phases of contract performance. Packaging and packing shall be in accordance with best commercial practices unless special handling and shipping requirements are further delineated in Procurement documents. Methods used shall be sufficient for protection against damage from normal handling, shipping, and storage conditions. ESD precautions in accordance with paragraph 2.16 shall apply as applicable. Finished parts shall be adequately protected to prevent damage during handling and shipment. Parts shall be individually wrapped, bagged, or otherwise protected to prevent part-to-part contact/damage when packaged within a larger pack. The supplier shall be responsible to determine method of packaging to assure adequate protection during transit. 2.19 Counterfeit Parts Avoidance and Substitution Control Plan Counterfeiting often involves cases where parts or assemblies are offered that present a product substitution and quality risk to CSW and to our end customer. CSW takes counterfeit parts mitigation very seriously. As a result, all purchase orders contain the following counterfeit parts clause:

Subcontractors, Contract Manufacturers and Franchised Distributors - “Only new and authentic materials are to be used in products delivered to L-3 Communications. No counterfeit or suspect counterfeit parts are to be contained within the delivered product. Parts shall be purchased directly from the OCMs/OEMs, or through the OCM/OEMs Franchised Distributor. Documentation must be available that authenticates traceability to the applicable OCM/OEM. Independent Distributors (Brokers) shall not be used without written consent from L-3. If suspect/counterfeit parts are furnished under this purchase order and found in any of the goods delivered hereunder, such items will be impounded by Buyer. The Seller shall promptly replace such suspect/counterfeit parts with parts acceptable to the Buyer and Seller shall be liable for all costs relating to the removal and replacement of said parts. Buyer reserves all contractual rights and remedies to address grievances and detrimental impacts caused by suspect/counterfeit parts.”

Independent Distributors - “Independent Distributor's procedures shall meet the requirements of IDEA-STD-1010 & SAE AS5553 and have a Quality Management System certified to AS9120:2002. The original manufacturers Certificate of Conformance (C of C) and all traceability documentation shall be included with each shipment of parts. It shall include the manufacturer’s name, address, part number, date codes, lot codes, serializations, and / or any other batch identifications. Seller is to contact Buyer in the event that the original OEM/OCM C of C and traceability documentation is not available. Inspections and tests required are as noted on the Purchase Order. All inspecting and



of 32

testing shall be performed to the original manufacturer’s specifications and parameters. Recorded evidence of all testing performed shall be included with each shipment. If suspect/counterfeit parts are furnished under this purchase order and are found in any of the goods delivered hereunder, such items will be impounded by Buyer. The Seller shall promptly replace such suspect/counterfeit parts with parts acceptable to the Buyer and the Seller shall be liable for all costs relating to the removal and replacement of said parts as specified in the purchase order requirements or Distributor’s insurance policies. All occurrences of Suspect Counterfeit and/or Counterfeit parts for this Purchase Order will be immediately reported to the Buyer. Buyer reserves all contractual rights and remedies to address grievances and detrimental impacts caused by suspect/counterfeit parts.”

A counterfeit or suspect part is one that is a copy or substitute without legal right or authority to do so or one whose material, performance, or characteristics are knowingly or unknowingly misrepresented by the seller. Examples of counterfeit parts include, but are not limited to:

Parts which do not contain the proper internal construction (die, manufacturer, wire bonding, etc.) consistent with the ordered part.

Parts which have been used, refurbished or reclaimed, but represented as new product.

Parts which have different package style or surface plating/finish than the ordered parts.

Parts which have not successfully completed the Original Component Manufacturer (OCM)’s full production and test flow, but are represented as completed product.

Parts sold as up-screened parts, which have not successfully completed up-screening.

Parts sold with modified labeling or markings intended to misrepresent the part’s form, fit, function, or grade, except in cases where performance is better than specified.

It is the seller’s responsibility to ensure they do not deliver counterfeit or suspect product to CSW. Seller shall develop and use a counterfeit avoidance and substitution control plan. The plan should be based upon compliance to Aerospace Standard SAE AS5553. The plan shall address the following, at a minimum:

Policy and/or procedure for use of approved authorized suppliers and authorized distributors.

Policy and/or procedure for use and qualification of independent distributors.

Handling of, and buyer notification of, obsolete part(s).

Notification and approval of buyer when parts cannot be procured through the authorized supply chain and distribution channels.

Policy and/or procedure for obtaining objective evidence of traceability to OEM. 1. Obtaining certificate of conformance from the Original Equipment/Component

Manufacturer (OEM/OCM) 2. Implementing risk mitigation processes such as part inspections, x-rays,

destructive analysis and testing, incoming receiving inspection, or third-party test facilities.

Flow down policy must cascade to all organizations that provide parts, materials and assemblies for CSW. Seller and its suppliers that are purchasing parts, materials and



of 32

assemblies for CSW shall have a counterfeit avoidance control plan that documents their processes for risk mitigation, disposition and reporting of counterfeit parts.

The seller’s counterfeit avoidance plan shall be available for review by the buyer upon request. The seller shall be responsible for development, maintenance, monitoring, and execution of this plan. Seller’s counterfeit parts avoidance and substitution plan records are subject to buyer audit, upon request. Reference AS 5553 Counterfeit Electronic Parts.

2.20 Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) The supplier shall support CSW in conducting a closed loop Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System under the guidance of MIL-HDBK-2155, and the applicable Supplier Data Requirement document. Supplier shall support and identify root-cause corrective actions to resolve quality issues in their products. The supplier shall provide for visibility and traceability of all reported equipment failures from discovery to closeout. The supplier shall close out all failure analysis reports within 30 days of occurrence, or rationale shall be provided and approved by CSW for any extensions. Failed item analysis reports shall comply with DI-ESS-81315A. 2.21 Traceability Requirements Unless otherwise specified on the Purchase Order, the Seller shall provide the means of end item traceability. The Seller may use the original manufacture Lot/Date/Heat Code or their method for identifying the end item product as required for proper traceability for non-serialized items. Multiple Lot/Date/Heat coded material must be packaged separately and the shipping document shall list individual lot/date codes and quantity.

Seller shall be responsible for maintaining all traceability data of lot-date codes (i.e. date of manufacture, batch-lot numbers, serial numbers, or unique identifiers for a production run) of all EEE parts on file at their facility and incorporated into CSW hardware. Seller shall supply this data to Buyer upon request.

Suppliers of EEE components shall ensure they are packaged and identified separately for each lot/date code shipped to CSW. When mixed lot/date codes are authorized, the shipping document shall list individual lot/date codes and quantity. Multiple lot/date codes shall not be co-mingled. In addition, the individual part containers shall be marked with the quantity and lot/date code. Each tape and reel package shall consist of one lot/date code only. The supplier will obtain the written approval of CSW’s authorized purchasing representative prior to shipping goods that do not meet this single lot/date code requirement. In the event that the CSW purchasing representative provides said authorization to ship mixed lot/date codes, the supplier shall provide a copy of the written authorization with the shipping document. The supplier is not authorized to ship substitute parts (i.e., better-than parts). Electrostatic sensitive devices (ESDS), parts shall be stored, handled and packaged in static shielding containers in accordance with paragraph 2.16, to ensure against damage by static induced voltage. The packaging shall be marked to assure static awareness upon receipt at CSW.



of 32

SECTION 3 – COMMODITY SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 3.0 COMMODITY SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS The requirements in this Section apply as indicated in Table 2, Standard Quality Requirements Matrix by SQR Commodity Designator.

Table 2: Standard Quality Requirements Matrix by SQR Commodity Designator

SQR Commodity Designator and Description

Reference Table 3: SQR Commodity Designator Definitions

Applicable SQR Section ( √ Indicates Section is Applicable)

3.1

F

irst

Art

icle

In

sp

ectio

n (

FA

I)

3.2

P

art

Ma

rkin

g R

eq

uir

em

en

ts

3.3

S

pe

cia

l P

roce

ss

Req

.

3.4

T

oo

ling

Re

qu

ire

me

nts

3.5

E

EE

3.6

C

asting

s a

nd

Fo

rgin

gs

3.7

K

its

3.8

S

oft

ware

Co

ntr

ol

A Metallic and Non-Metallic Raw Materials - √ √ - - - - -

C Castings & Forgings √ √ √ √ - √ - -

D Kits - √ - - - - √ -

E Fabricated Parts √ √ √ √ - √ - -

F Mechanical and Electrical Standard Parts/Hardware - √ - - - - - -

G Electrical, Electronic and Electromechanical (EEE) Parts √ √ √ - √ - √ -

H Structural Assemblies √ √ √ √ - √ - -

I Functional Assemblies √ √ √ √ - √ - -

J Electronic Assemblies and Sub-Assemblies √ √ - - - - - √

L Non-Metallic and Composite Detail Parts √ √ √ √ - - - -

M Paints, Sealants and Chemicals - √ - - - - - -

N Major Components and Assemblies √ √ √ √ - √ - √

O Special Processing - - √ - - - - -

P Technical Services - - - - - - - -

Q Tooling - - - √ - - - -

R Repairs - - √ √ - - - -

S Software - - - - - - - √

U Commercial Items - - - - - - - -

V Research and Development (R&D)/Advanced Programs - - - - - - - -

W Custom/Modified Off the Shelf (Modification features only) √ √ √ √ - - - -



of 32

3.1 Supplier First Article Inspection (FAI) Requirements First Article Inspection (FAI) shall be performed prior to shipment to CSW and in accordance with the requirements of this SQR document, Section 3 and Table 2, unless otherwise specified contractually. FAI shall be provided on all first time buy parts, including modifications to standard catalogue or Commercial-Off-the-Shelf (COTS) items, for the modification(s) only. Unless contractually required, FAI does not apply to:

Development and prototype parts identified by CSW.

Unique single run production orders, not intended for ongoing production (e.g., out-of-production spares) identified by CSW.

Procured standard catalogue items, COTS, or deliverable software. CSW Engineering shall review completed FAI reports prior to FAI and product acceptance. If the FAI report is rejected the supplier will take action to bring the FAI into an acceptable condition and resubmit the FAI for CSW review and approval.

3.1.1 The Supplier shall use the CSW provided FAI forms for all First Article Inspection Reports. Reference Supplier Web under the CSW Supplier "Quality" Requirements. http://www2.l-3com.com/csw/docs/wsm/DefaultWSM.aspx As a minimum the supplier is required to complete all required fields on the CSW provided forms, whoever attachments are acceptable for objective evidence that all part number accountability , product accountability, and characteristic accountability have been met.

3.1.2 The Supplier shall consider the following activities during FAI planning and coordinate planning with CSW, unless otherwise specified contractually.

1. Determination of design characteristic inspection and sequencing for inspection of characteristics not measurable in the final product. 2. Extraction of digital product definition (DPD) design characteristics required for product realization that are not fully defined on 2D drawings, including tolerances for nominal dimensions. 3. Determination of objective evidence to be included in the FAIR for each design characteristic. 4. Determination that approved special process, laboratory, material, and customer required sources are identified, as applicable, and that the manufacturing planning, routing, and purchase document call out the correct specification and relevant sources. 5. Determination that key characteristic and critical item requirements are identified, as applicable. 6. Determination when part specific gauges and tooling are required. These gauges and tooling are identified, qualified and traceable, as appropriate. 7. Provide for customer FAI review, if required.

3.1.3 Digital Product Definition Requirements (DPD) When design requirements are in a DPD format and traditional 2D drawing information is not available for all applicable design requirements, DPD design characteristics required for product realization shall be extracted, verified, and included in the FAIR.

http://www2.l-3com.com/csw/docs/wsm/DefaultWSM.aspx

http://www2.l-3com.com/csw/docs/wsm/DefaultWSM.aspx



of 32

3.1.4 FAI Evaluation Activities The Supplier shall conduct the following activities during product realization, when applicable, in support of FAI to ensure conformance with design characteristics:

a. Review documentation for the manufacturing process (e.g., routing sheets, manufacturing or quality plans, manufacturing work instructions) to ensure all operations are complete as planned and call out the correct specification, material types, conditions, and approvals. b. Review supporting documentation in the FAI (e.g., inspection data, test data, Acceptance Test Procedures, special process approvals and certifications) for completeness. c. Verify that the raw material and special process certifications call out the correct specification, material types, conditions, and approvals. d. Verify that required customer approved sources are utilized. e. Verify that required designed tooling (e.g., part specific gauges) are used and appropriately documented. f. Verify that every design characteristic requirement is accounted for, uniquely identified, and has inspection results traceable to each unique identifier. g. Verify the design characteristics that are the output of the manufacturing process are measured, inspected, tested, or verified to determine conformance, including DPD characteristics as required per 3.1.2, (2). h. Verify part marking is legible, correct in content and size, and properly located per applicable specifications.

3.1.5 Partial or Re-accomplishment of First Article Inspection a. The FAI requirement, once invoked, shall continue to apply even after initial compliance. b. The FAI requirements may be satisfied by a partial FAI that addresses only the changes from a baseline part number provided all other characteristics were conforming on the previous FAI and are produced by the original production processes. c. When a partial FAI is performed, the organization shall, as a minimum, complete the affected fields in the FAI forms. d. When the organization performs a partial FAI, the organization shall record the “Baseline Part Number”, including the revision level and reason for the partial FAI on CSW Form 1 (see field 14). e. FAI requirements may be satisfied by a previously approved FAI performed on identical characteristics of similar parts produced by identical means. When FAI requirements (partial or full) are satisfied in this manner, identify the “Baseline Part Number” on CSW Form 1 f. The supplier shall perform a full FAI or a partial FAI for affected characteristics, when any of the following occurs:

1. A change in the design characteristics affecting fit, form, or function of the part. 2. A change in manufacturing source(s), process(es), inspection method(s), location of manufacture, tooling, or materials that can potentially affect fit, form, or function. 3. A change in numerical control program or translation to another media that can potentially affect fit, form, or function.



of 32

4. A natural or man-made event, which may adversely affect the manufacturing process. 5. A lapse in production for two years shall require an update for any characteristics that may be impacted by the inactivity. This lapse is from the completion of last production operation to the actual restart of production.

3.1.6 Record Results a. The supplier shall record the requirements and results in the units specified on the drawing, DPD, or specification, unless otherwise approved by the customer. b. Results from inspection of design characteristics shall be expressed in quantitative terms (i.e., variable data), when a design characteristic is expressed by numerical limits. Except that attribute data (e.g., pass/fail) may be used in lieu of variable data when:

1. No inspection technique resulting in variable data is feasible; or 2. Designed tooling or qualified tooling is consistently used as a check feature and a go/no-go feature has been established for the specific characteristic. When qualified tooling (e.g., radius gauges) are used as a go/no-go gauge, record the gauge value or range (e.g., minimum/maximum value), as applicable.

c. Attribute data shall be used, when the design characteristic does not specify numerical limits (e.g., break all sharp edges).

3.1.7.Upon completion of a successful first article inspection, the supplier shall continue to use the same process as was used in the first production; the supplier shall control all manufacturing, processing, testing and inspections as stated in the production of the first article. No changes/deviations, including the selection of supplier’s sub-tier suppliers/processors, are permitted without CSW’s prior knowledge and written authorization via a Change or Information Request (CIR) (form SLC-9012). This form needs to be submitted to the assigned buyer for processing. 3.2 Part Marking Requirements Supplier shall mark all deliverable products as required by the purchase order, engineering drawing and manufacturing planning. In addition, products with Commodity Designator C, E, H, I, J, L, N and W shall also be identified with the CAGE code or equivalent identifier traceable to the supplier. Unless otherwise stated in the engineering requirements, the supplier shall apply the date of manufacture, date code(s) or other control identifier number (see examples below) to all deliverable hardware. Information must be applied adjacent to the hardware’s identification markings and must be traceable to supplier’s build documentation. Hardware produced in lots, batches, groups, etc., shall have traceable control information applied. When size of hardware, or supplier’s automated stamping process, does not permit data application to individual hardware (such as standard parts), the information shall be similarly placed on bags, tags, or labels as applicable.



of 32

Examples of traceable information may include, but are not limited to:

Date of manufacture

Serial number

Lot number

Control number

Heat lot number

Final inspection date

Batch number

Casting number

Work order number 3.3 Special Process Requirements Suppliers who provide “Special Process” services or product to CSW that has been manufactured using “Special Process” (Special Processors) are required to have those special processes validated and approved by CSW Supplier Quality, unless otherwise specified by contractual flowdown from CSW. NADCAP accreditation for special processes is a preferred method for validation, and may be used in-lieu of CSW approval at CSW’s discretion. NADCAP accreditation may be imposed by contract as defined by the CSW Statement of Work or purchasing requirements documentation. A processor’s approval may be determined based on the CSW review and verification of current Nadcap accreditation, process verification reports for those processes, product/process audits and any delta audit as required by CSW unique process specification requirements. All costs associated with NADCAP accreditation are to be borne by the supplier (processor). CSW considers the following process categories as Special Processes:

Nondestructive testing

Heat treating

Material testing laboratories

Chemical processes

Non-conventional machining and surface enhancements

Welding

Composites

Powder coat paint Special Process verification and validation also applies to sub-tier suppliers with internal process capabilities. In order to assure compliance to requirements and meet our customer’s expectations CSW is implementing additional supplier/sub-tier supplier oversight. All special processes that are performed within the CSW supply chain, including any sub-tier suppliers require direct evaluation, validation, and approval by CSW Supplier Quality. NADCAP accreditation may be accepted in-lieu of CSW validation and approval at CSW’s discretion. A list of CSW approved special processors is available through Supplier Quality upon request.



of 32

If for any reason a supplier transfers special process workload (i.e. outsource, and sub-contract) CSW must be notified. Any special process that is transferred requires specific prior approval by CSW Supplier Quality and may be subject to further verification and validation. Note: Parts and/or assemblies processed to the required process specification revision level by an approved processor, but purchased and/or delivered after the process specification was revised or superseded, are acceptable. Age-sensitive material (shelf life items) is precluded from this noted exception. Cancelled or superseded military specifications that are called out on legacy CSW engineering drawings and drawings with CSW acquired design cognizance shall be certified to the latest or superseding specifications, provided there is a clear linkage via DODISS or IHS website. Suppliers are cautioned to verify the “Cancellation Notice” because certain cancelled military specifications have been reinstated in recent years. In addition, processing shall be continued to the last valid revision of the cancelled specification when the “Cancellation Notice” does not provide a clear direction for a superseding specification or as directed by CSW. Note: Suppliers with design authority may approve their own sub tier special process source(s) to their process specifications. This authority does not extend to other Primes’ process specifications, such as Northrop, Boeing or Lockheed Martin. Subcontracted processing of components of supplier design must be performed by supplier-approved facilities whose capabilities and performance are supported by objective evidence of control such as surveys and/or test results. A listing of all facilities being used must be available for review by CSW which reserves the right of disapproval of those facilities not considered satisfactory. The suppliers shall not substitute their own process specification for the CSW or customer required process specification without prior written approval from CSW. 3.4 Tooling Requirements Special tooling (supplier manufactured or CSW furnished) used as a media of inspection must be described in the supplier’s process at the applicable operation/sequence where the inspection occurs. Inspection media tooling must be controlled as part of the supplier’s “Periodic or Calibration” system prior to use in production. 3.6 Castings & Forgings a) Qualified Die: In accordance with applicable material specifications as called out on the engineering drawing and prior to initial production, CSW designed castings or forgings require a first piece inspection. The die or pattern must be qualified prior to actual production of deliverable product. Actual first piece inspection dimensions are to be recorded and submitted to CSW for validation. Shipment is to be withheld pending die or pattern dimensional approval from CSW. b) Identification: Castings and forgings shall be ink stamped with the lot number and the heat treat log number. Test specimens are required from each casting, forging, or heat treat lot.



of 32

3.7 Kits The supplier shall ensure kits shipped are in accordance with the purchase order requirements. The applicable SQR requirements invoked depend upon the ordered material within the kit. For example, a kit containing a fabricated part and a standard mechanical assembly will be compliant with all applicable section requirements for SQR Commodity Designator E (Fabricated part), SQR Commodity Designator F (Mechanical/Electrical Standard part) and Commodity Designator G (EEE Parts). 3.8 Software Control Supplier shall implement and maintain a Software Quality Assurance (SQA) program as a means of monitoring the software engineering processes, and establishing methods used to ensure software product quality. The SQA Program shall encompass the entire software development lifecycle, including processes such as requirements definition, software design, coding, source code control, code reviews, software configuration management, testing, release management, and product integration, as appropriate. For deliverable product identified as Commodity Designator “S” per Table 2, Supplier shall prepare and submit a SQA Plan in accordance with IEE 12207. The SQA Plan shall be submitted no later than 30 days after receipt of order.



of 32

SECTION 4 – GENERAL INFORMATION 4.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

Table 3: SQR Commodity Designator Definitions

SQR Commodity

Designator Description

A – Metallic and Non-Metallic Raw Materials

Associated with metallic (ferrous and non-ferrous) or non metallic materials that are controlled by a material specification, i.e., sheet, bar/plate/round stock, ingots, extrusions, tubing, bare wire, fiberglass, graphite, Kevlar, plastics, rubber sheets, etc. Materials may be provided by the original mill or manufacturer, or furnished by distributors.

B – Intentionally left blank.

C – Castings & Forgings “As cast” castings and forgings.

D – Kits Various types of material that may be contained within a plastic bag, box, or sealable enclosure specifically packaged together for the purpose of ease of assembly, modification, repair, and/or completion of any mechanical/structural or electrical/electronic assembly. Kitted parts may be any combination of standard electrical or mechanical hardware, fabricated, non-metallic, or composite details, hand tools, paints, chemicals, sealants, or tape.

E – Fabricated Parts Parts that are fabricated from sheet metal through metal forming/blanking/chemical milling operations, i.e. stampings, stretch form, brake form, routing, punch press, drop hammer, joggling, hand forming, hydro forming. Simple to complex metallic parts that are machined from plate/bar/round stock, extrusion, castings, or forgings. Including those that have minor assembly work such as installation of bushings or bearings or have been welded.

F – Mechanical & Electrical Standard Parts/Hardware

Fittings, couplings, springs, fasteners, o-rings, inserts, pins, decals, nameplates, cables, insulated wires, blank circuit boards, connectors, switches and miscellaneous small parts controlled by design standard drawings.

G – Electrical, Electronic, or Electromechanical (EEE) Parts

Electronic components (i.e., resistors, capacitors, diodes, transistor, integrated circuits , resistor arrays, logic gates, etc.). Electrical and electromechanical devices having manufacturer codes where date/lot, batch number, date of manufacture, serial number, etc. are provided for material traceability.

H - Structural Assemblies Simple/minor metallic or composite aircraft structures and sub-assemblies such as windshields/windows, doors, flaps, canopies, radomes, nacelles, etc.

I - Functional Assemblies Mechanical, hydraulic, electromechanical, fuel, oxygen, pyrotechnics, parachutes, life rafts, pneumatics, landing gears, actuators, valves, hydraulic pumps/motors, electrical motors, and aircraft assemblies that usually require acceptance/functional testing (ATP).

J - Electronic Assemblies and Sub-Assemblies

Electronic assemblies/sub-assemblies that usually require acceptance/functional testing (ATP), i.e., populated circuit boards, “black boxes,” flight control computers, recorders, radios, wiring harnesses, antennas, and waveguides, etc.

K – Intentionally left blank.

L - Non-Metallic & Composite Details/Parts

Parts that are fabricated from graphite, plastic, phenolic, rubber, Kevlar, i.e. seals, gaskets, blankets, etc. Fiberglass, honeycomb, laminate, and any other composite detail parts, such as skin panels, fairings, etc. These parts can be either fabricated to an engineering drawing or procured to a material specification.

M - Paints, Sealants, & Chemicals

Airborne paints, sealants, adhesives, chemicals and consumables (e.g. tape) procured to a material specification for use on contract deliverable items.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_circuit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_circuit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resistor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_gate



of 32

SQR Commodity Designator

Description

N - Major Components/ Assemblies

Supplier designed components, mechanical and avionic systems or subsystems typically Prime Mission Equipment (PME). Also included are high-value hardware items, hardware considered to be critical to flight performance and/or safety.

O - Special Processing Outside or in-house processing performed to a process specification in support of material/parts finish/testing requirements, i.e., anodize, paint, plating, welding, chemical milling, heat treat, non-destructive test (NDT), etc. that requires customer process approval.

P - Technical Services Services provided in support of assuring product compliance, i.e., calibration, testing, inspection, NDT technical support, etc.

Q –Tooling Usually associated with tooling purchased by CSW for use by CSW or the supplier in producing/validating parts/assemblies. Tools usually are fabricated in accordance with CSW/CSW customer tooling specifications

R – Repairs Related to the repair or overhaul of items originally procured with SQR Commodity Designator I, J, N, or W only, that have either been in service or are no longer in warranty. Typical items include Line Replaceable Units (LRU), assemblies and sub-assemblies that require testing.

S – Software Contract deliverable software.

T - Intentionally left blank.

U – Commercial Items (1) Any item, other than real property, that is of a type customarily used by the general public or by non-governmental entities for purposes other than governmental purposes, and

(a) has been sold, leased, or licensed to the general public, or (b) has been offered for sale, lease, or license to the general public; or

(2) Any item that evolved from an item described in paragraph (1) of this definition through advances in technology or performance and that is not yet available in the commercial marketplace, but will be available in the commercial marketplace in time to satisfy the delivery requirements under a Government solicitation. Note: This Designator is not for commercial items that include any program unique

parts or embedded software unique to CSW.

V – Research & Development (R&D)/Advanced Programs

Products that are procured for an experimental proof of concept. This does not include pre-production development phases such as Engineering Manufacturing and Development (EMD), System Design and Development (SDD), etc., and are not used for production contracts.

W – Custom/Modified Off The Shelf

Assemblies and sub-assemblies that consist of Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) catalog items that are uniquely configured/assembled for a particular program or application and are not sold to the general public in this configuration.



of 32

Specifications and Standards Number Title

AA-05-01 USAF Airworthiness Advisory, “Lead-Free Solder”

ANSI NCSL Z540 Requirements for the Calibration of Measuring and Test Equipment

ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes

ANSI/ASQ Z1.9 Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Variables for Percent Nonconforming

ANSI/ESD S20.20 Protection of Electrical and Electronic Parts, Assembles, and Equipment

AS 5553 Counterfeit electronic Parts; Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition

AS 9003 Inspection and Test Quality System

AS 9100 Quality Management Systems – Requirements for Aviation, Space and Defense Organizations

AS 9102 Aerospace first Article Inspection Requirements

AS 9120 Quality Management Systems – Requirements for Aviation, Space and Defense Distributors

ASA-100 Aviation Suppliers Association Quality System Standard

ASTM B545 Standard Specification for Electrodeposited Coatings of Tin

DI-RELI-80253 Failed Item Analysis Report

DI-SESS-81315A Data Item Description: Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Report (FRACAS)

GEIA-STD-0005-1 Performance Standard for Aerospace and High Performance Electronic Systems Containing Lead-free Solder

GEIA-STD-0005-2 Standard for Mitigating the Effects of Tim Whiskers in Aerospace and High Performance Electronic Systems

GEIA-STD-0006 Requirements for Using Solder Dip to Replace the Finish on Electronic Piece Parts

IPC/WHMA-A-620 Requirements and Acceptance for Cable and Wire Harness Assemblies

IPC-2220 Design Standards Series

IPC-A-600 Acceptability of Printed Boards Training and Certification Program

IPC-A-610 Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies

ISO 10012 Measurement management systems - Requirements for measurement processes and measuring equipment

ISO 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories

ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems – Requirements

J-STD-001 Requirements for Soldered electrical and Electronic Assemblies

J-STD-003 Solderability Tests for Printed Boards

J-STD-004 Requirements for Soldering Fluxes

MIL-STD-129 Military Marking for Shipment and Storage

MIL-STD-1686 Electrostatic Discharge Control Program for Protection of Electrical and Electronic Parts, Assemblies and Equipment

MIL-STD-1916 DOD Preferred Methods for Acceptance of Product

MIL-HDBK-2155 Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System

Nadcap AC7004 Word for Word equivalent of SAE AS 9003

SAE ARP 9013 Statistical Product Acceptance Requirements

SAE AS 9006 Deliverable Aerospace Software Supplement for AS9100A

SAE AS 9115 Quality Managements Systems - Requirements for Aviation, Space and Defense Organizations - Deliverable Software (supplement to 9100)

SAE AS 5553 Counterfeit Electronic Parts; Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition

L-3 CSW Forms

SLC-2525 Source Inspection Report (Hard Copy Only)

SLC-3892 Supplier Nonconforming Request

SLC-9012 Change or Information Request

SLC-9019 Supplier Corrective Action Request



of 32

Revision Record The latest issue of this document may be confirmed by viewing the Terms and Conditions at www.l-3com.com/csw/docs/general/.

Revision Date Primary Change Summary

New 07-28-2010 Initial Release

01 10-12-2011 Added clarification to several sections. Added Incorporation of Commercial Product to Section 2. Added Lead-Free finishes to section 2.15. Added record to section 2.17c. Added Counterfeit parts to section 2.20. Updated date for AS9100/ISO 9001 registration in section 2.1. Modified Table numbers and placements. Modified Specifications and Standards. Changes are indicated with blue text.

02 11/8/2011 Modified Section 3.3. Changes are indicated with blue text.

03 8/28/2012 Modified several sections throughout. Changes are indicated with blue text.

04 12/6/2012 Updated oversight and requirements for special processes. Changes are indicated with blue text.

05 2/3/2015 Modified and updated to coincide with SAP


supplier quality requirements (sqr) - l3 technologies · pdf filesupplier quality requirements...

Documents