supporting information · 16 table s1 comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Supporting Information
Expeditious and eco-friendly fabrication of highly uniform microflower superstructures
and their applications in highly durable methanol oxidation and high-performance
supercapacitors
Sivaprakasam Radhakrishnana, Hak-Yong Kimb,c, Byoung-Suhk Kimb,c*
a Electrodics and Electrocatalysis Division, CSIR-Central Electrochemical Research Institute,
Karaikudie-630003,Tamilnadu, Indiab Department of Organic Materials & Fiber Engineering, Chonbuk National University, 567
Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 54896, Republic of Korea.
c Department of BIN Convergence Technology, Chonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 54896, Republic of Korea.
*Corresponding Author: Byoung-Suhk Kim; E-mail: [email protected]
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Journal of Materials Chemistry A.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
![Page 2: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Fig. S1 Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and element composition for as-prepared
CuS MF superstructure
Element Wt% At%
Cu 66.18 49.69
S 33.82 50.31
![Page 3: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Fig. S2 XRD spectra of CuS product prepared in different sulfur sources
![Page 4: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Fig. S3 XRD spectra of CuS product prepared in different copper sources
![Page 5: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Fig. S4 FE-SEM image of CuS product prepared in triethylene glycol as solvent
![Page 6: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Fig. S5 FE-SEM image of CuS product prepared in water as solvent
![Page 7: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Fig. S6 Cyclic volammtery characterization of CuS modified GC electrode in 0.1 M NaOH
solution as electrolyte in the potential window between -0.1 to 0.7 V at a scan rate of 50 mV/s.
![Page 8: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Fig. S7 Cyclic voltammogram response of CuS modified GC electrode at different scan rate 10-200 mV/s in 0.1 M NaOH solution containing 0.25 M methanol.
![Page 9: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Fig. S8 The dependence of the transient current density values at CuS modified GC electrode on t-1/2 in 0.1 M NaOH containing various concentration of methanol.
![Page 10: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Fig. S9 Cyclic voltammograms curves for the CuS modified electrode in 0.1 M NaOH solution containing 0.5 M methanol at a scan rate of 50 mVs-1. Inset shows the zoomed main panel
![Page 11: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Fig. S10 The variation of the peak current with cycling number for the CuS modified electrode in 0.1 M NaOH solution containing 0.5 M methanol.
![Page 12: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Fig. S11 CV behavior of CuS modified nickel foam electrode at a scan rate of 5 mVs-1 in 2 M
NaOH solution.
![Page 13: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Fig. S12 CV behavior of CuS modified nickel foam and bare nickel foam electrode at a scan
rate of 50 mVs-1 in 2 M NaOH solution.
![Page 14: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Fig. S13 Peak current vs. square root of the scan rate.
![Page 15: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Fig. S14 Electrochemical impedance spctrum as Nyquist plot of CuS electrode
![Page 16: Supporting Information · 16 Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071116/5fff33f3fd8828617014a08e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Table S1 Comparison of the catalytic rate constant (k) of different modified electrodes for
electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol reported in literature
Electrode Modifier K/cm3 mol-1 s-1 Ref.
Carbon rod Ni-MnOx/C 3.26 × 103 [1]
Carbon steel plate Ni-Cu-P alloy 1.40 × 104 [2]
Carbon paste Ni(OH)2-NiCo2O4 1.16 × 102 [3]
Glassy carbon NiMn-salenA 7.56 × 103 [4]
Carbon paste Ni/ZIF-8 1.31× 104 [5]
Glassy carbon Poly(Ni-Curcumin) 2.04× 103 [6]
Glassy carbon CuS 7.44 × 105 This work
[1] R.M.A. Hameed, Appl. Surf. Sci. 357 (2015) 417-428.
[2] L-S. Yuan, Y-X. Zheng, M-L. Jia, S-J. Zhang, X-L. Wang, C. Peng, Electrochim. Acta 154
(2015) 54-62
[3] M.U.A. Prathap, B. Satpati, R. Srivastava, Electrochim. Acta 130 (2014) 368-380.
[4] W. wang, R. Li, R. Zhang, J. Ma, B. Wang, J. Electroanal. Chem. 742 (2015) 110-121.
[5] S-M. Abdolraouf, S. Ghasemi, G-R. Hamid, J. Power. Sources 303 (2016) 379-387.
[6] A. Ciszewski, G. Milczarek, B. Lewandowska, K. Krutowski, Electroanalysis 15 (2003) 518-
523.