supporting online material for - yadvinder malhi€¦ · web viewsupporting information for...
TRANSCRIPT
[Geophysical Research Letters]
Supporting Information for
Extensive twenty-first century woody encroachment in South America’s Savanna
Thais M. Rosan1, Luiz E. O. C. Aragão1, Imma Oliveras2, Oliver L. Phillips3, Yadvinder Malhi2, Emanuel Gloor3, Fabien H. Wagner1
1Tropical Ecosystems and Environmental Sciences Laboratory – TREES, Remote Sensing Division, National Institute for Space Research. São José dos
Campos, Brazil. 2Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment,
University of Oxford OX13QY, Oxford, UK.3Ecology and Global Change, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds
LS2 9JT, UK.
Contents of this file
Figures S1 to S4Table S1 to S3
Introduction
This Supporting Information contains Figure S1 which presents the study area of this work. Figure S2 and table S1provides the spatial variation p-value and slopes of EVImax trend (Figure 1, main text). Table S3 provides the EVImax change area for each biome. Figure S3 provides the spatial trends of land use and land cover described in the main text. Figure S4 and table S3 provide the burned area per year over the study area and for the pixels with woody encroachment.
1
12
1
2
3
45
67
89
10
1112
1314
15
16171819
20
21222324252627
282930313233
34
Figure S1. Spatial location of the study area and Cerrado vegetation mask. The study area comprises the Cerrado biome plus a buffer of 100 km in order to also analyze the transitional areas. The remaining vegetation mask was based on grid-cells that presented >80% of remaining natural areas in 2015 from MapBiomas classification.
2
56
3435363738
394041424344
45
78
Figure S2. Spatial distribution of the p-value and their respective slopes (mean slope ± SD slope) from the trend analysis. More than 68% of the pixels presented p<0.05. However, we used a confidence level of 90% to mask non-significant pixels based on previous studies (Anyamba & Tucker, 2005; Mitchard & Flintrop, 2013). The areas of each slope class is in Table S1.
3
910
4647484950515253
1112
Figure S3. Pixel-by-pixel trends of land cover classes through time (p<0.1) for the entire study area.
4
1314
54555657
1516
Figure S4. Annual burned area from MOD64A1 product of the total study area and for the fraction of the pixels with increase in EVImax (woody encroachment).
p-value (mean slope ± SD slope)
Area (km²) Mean change in EVImax units (±
SD EVImax units)p<0.01 (0.006±0.003) 50,204 0.09 (±0.045)
Positive slopes
p<0.05 (0.004±0.001) 72,489 0.06 (±0.015)
p<0.1 (0.003±0.001) 49,259 0.045 (±0.015)p<0.01 (-0.007±0.003) 19,316 -0.1 (±0.045)
Negative slopes
p<0.05 (-0.004±0.002) 26,247 -0.06 (±0.03)
p<0.1 (-0.003±0.001) 19,983 -0.045(±0.015)
5
1718
5859606162
1920
Table S1. P-value classes associated to slope and their respective area (km²) and changes in EVImax units in 15 years.
Biome EVImax decrease (km²)
EVImax increase (km²)
All the biome limit Cerrado 24,333 122,573Caatinga 35,803 4,019
Buffer zone area Pantanal 1,909 22,895(transition) Amazônia 2,626 35,570
Mata Atlântica 850 3,705Total 65,521 171,953
Table S2. Change in EVImax (km²) by each biome of our studied area.
Year Burned area for the pixels with
Woody encroachment
(km²)
Percentage
2001 13,186 82002 17,733 102003 9,915 62004 14,067 82005 17,042 102006 7,636 42007 28,945 172008 9,808 62009 5,275 32010 29,510 172011 10,449 62012 23,441 142013 9,507 62014 14,188 82015 16,181 9
6
2122
6364
65
66
67
68
6970
717273
2324
Table S3. Annual burned area (km²) and burned area percentage of the pixels with woody encroachment.
References
Anyamba, A., & Tucker, C. J. (2005). Analysis of Sahelian vegetation dynamics using NOAA-AVHRR NDVI data from 1981–2003. Journal of Arid Environments, 63(3), 596–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.007
Mitchard, E. T. a, & Flintrop, C. M. (2013). Woody encroachment and forest degradation in sub-Saharan Africa’s woodlands and savannas 1982-2006. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1625), 20120406. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0406
7
2526
74757677787980818283848586
2728